

Currently released so far... 13368 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AEMR
AMGT
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
AJ
AF
AFIN
AS
AM
AFFAIRS
AA
ADM
ALOW
ACOA
ATRN
AID
AND
APER
ADANA
APEC
ADPM
ADCO
ABLD
AADP
AG
ARF
AMED
AY
AORG
ASEAN
ABUD
AROC
AE
AO
AL
APCS
AGAO
AINF
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ASUP
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASIG
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
AN
AIT
ANET
AGMT
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BA
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BK
BL
BH
BM
BTIO
BP
BO
BE
BILAT
BC
BX
BIDEN
BF
BBSR
BT
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CD
CV
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CM
CONS
CW
CN
CDC
CT
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTRY
CBE
CIVS
COPUOS
CARSON
CTR
COUNTER
COM
CR
CFED
CKGR
CHR
CVR
CLINTON
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CIC
CITT
CAFTA
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CAC
CL
CACS
CAPC
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EU
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ELTN
EIND
EZ
EI
ER
ET
EINT
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EXIM
ES
ECONOMY
ERNG
ELECTIONS
ENERG
EK
EPA
ENGR
ETRC
ENVI
EXTERNAL
ELN
EAIDS
ECA
EFTA
EINVEFIN
EUREM
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EFINECONCS
ECOSOC
ETC
ENVR
EAP
EINN
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
ESA
EAIG
EUR
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ENNP
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
GM
GG
GERARD
GT
GA
GR
GTIP
GLOBAL
GV
GH
GL
GOV
GOI
GF
GTMO
GANGS
GCC
GAERC
GE
GZ
GAZA
GY
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
IV
IMF
IBRD
INDO
IWC
IRAQI
ISRAELI
ITALY
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
ICAO
ITRA
IPR
INMARSAT
ID
ICRC
INTERNAL
IIP
IRS
ICTY
IQ
IO
ICJ
ILC
IEFIN
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
INRB
IAHRC
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IL
IACI
IDA
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ITF
INRA
INRO
IBET
INTELSAT
IDP
ICTR
IRC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KOMC
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KPAO
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KMDR
KTER
KSPR
KV
KTFN
KWMN
KFRD
KSTH
KS
KN
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KMOC
KCIP
KTDB
KBIO
KU
KSTC
KICC
KIRC
KSEO
KSAF
KR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KIRF
KOCI
KMPI
KCRCM
KNUC
KIDE
KPAONZ
KHLS
KPRP
KHDP
KNUP
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KNAR
KWAC
KJUST
KTBT
KBCT
KNPP
KO
KBTS
KSCI
KACT
KFSC
KENV
KAWK
KHSA
KPRV
KVIR
KCFE
KX
KVRP
KCOM
KAID
KPWR
KTLA
KMFO
KNNPMNUC
KNDP
KMRS
KERG
KPOA
KRCM
KCFC
KNEI
KCHG
KPLS
KREL
KFTFN
KTFM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KRAD
KBTR
KGIT
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KREC
KIFR
KSAC
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KFPC
KRIM
KDDG
KCGC
KPAI
KID
KMIG
KNSD
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
ML
MR
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MAS
MO
MTCR
MIL
MAPP
MG
MD
MAR
MZ
MU
MP
MA
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MW
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MARAD
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MEDIA
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MPS
MC
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NG
NL
NU
NPT
NS
NA
NATIONAL
NSF
NDP
NR
NSSP
NP
NIPP
NGO
NAS
NE
NZUS
NH
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NEW
NRR
NT
NASA
NAR
NK
NOVO
NATOPREL
NSC
NV
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
OPRC
ODC
OIIP
OPDC
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OEXC
OPAD
ODIP
OPCW
OIE
OFDP
OFFICIALS
OHUM
OSCI
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
OVP
ON
OCII
OES
OCS
OIC
PGOV
PREL
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PPA
PCI
PAS
PALESTINIAN
PROP
PTE
PA
PAIGH
PO
PROG
PJUS
POLITICAL
PMIL
PGOF
PDOV
PSI
PG
PRAM
PREO
PARMS
PAO
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PP
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PNAT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PEDRO
PF
PHUS
PTBS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PINL
PBT
PINF
PRL
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PROV
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RICE
RM
REGION
RO
ROOD
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RUPREL
REMON
REACTION
REPORT
RSO
SZ
SENV
SOCI
SNAR
SY
SO
SP
SU
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SCUL
SG
SW
SR
SYRIA
SPECIALIST
SEN
SC
SF
SL
SAARC
SNARIZ
SARS
STEINBERG
SCRS
SWE
SN
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SEVN
SHUM
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SNARN
SIPRS
TRGY
TBIO
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TP
TW
TZ
TF
TN
TC
TL
TV
TS
TT
TK
TD
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
TBID
THPY
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
USTR
UZ
USEU
UV
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
UY
USPS
UNHRC
USUN
UNESCO
UNCHR
UNHCR
USNC
UNEP
USOAS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNO
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
UNCHC
UNCSD
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
UNCND
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09PANAMA550, IN BARGAIN BASEMENT BID, SPANISH TO EXPAND PANAMA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PANAMA550.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09PANAMA550 | 2009-07-09 21:36 | 2011-04-11 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN | Embassy Panama |
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHZP #0550/01 1902136
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 092136Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY PANAMA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3575
INFO RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID PRIORITY 0338
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 0237
RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN PRIORITY 0022
RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAUSA/PANCANALCO WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L PANAMA 000550
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/07/2019
TAGS: ECON EINV ETRD MARR PM EWWT PREL
SUBJECT: IN BARGAIN BASEMENT BID, SPANISH TO EXPAND PANAMA
CANAL
REF: A. 2007 PANAMA 1899
¶B. 2008 PANAMA 320
¶C. 2008 PANAMA 732
¶D. 2008 PANAMA 820
¶E. 2008 PANAMA 851
¶F. 2009 PANAMA 195
¶G. 2009 PANAMA 519
¶H. 2009 STATE 69224
¶I. 2009 PANAMA 539
Classified By: Ambassador Stephenson for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (C) During a morning of high political theater, President
Martinelli, Panama's senior government officials, consortia
representatives, diplomatic corps, and the public (through
live TV and an internet broadcast) witnessed the presentation
of the technical scores and the opening of the financial bids
on July 8. After brief real-time calculations, the Panama
Canal Authority (ACP) announced that Sacyr's consortium won
the bid to build the third set of locks, centerpiece of the
$5.25 billion Panama Canal Expansion. Bechtel believes Sacyr
broke EU anti-competiveness laws in obtaining its surety
bonds and will protest if they find a smoking gun. The Sacyr
win signals expanding Spanish influence in Panama and a
potential loss of American export opportunities for the
project (although much of the sourcing has not yet been
determined).
----------
SACYR WINS
----------
¶2. (U) President Martinelli, Panama's senior government and
ACP officials, consortia representatives, diplomatic corps
members, and the public (through live TV and an internet
broadcast) witnessed the awarding of the locks contract, the
centerpiece of the $5.25 billion Panama Canal Expansion, to a
consortium led by Sacyr Vallehermoso S.A.. The other
consortia members are Impregilo S.P.A. (Italian), Jan de Nul
N.V. (Belgian), Constructora Urbana, S.A. (Panamanian and run
by the first cousin of the Panama Canal Administrator),
Montgomery Watson Harza (American), IV-Groep (Dutch), Tetra
Tech (American), and Heerema Fabrication Group (Dutch).
---------------------------------
PROCESS FOR DETERMINING SACYR WON
---------------------------------
¶3. (C) The ACP declared Sacyr to have the "best value"
proposal. Out of a possible 10,000 points, Sacyr obtained a
dominating 8089 points; Bechtel - 6770 points; and ACS - 6559
points. The total point tally was composed from technical
and financial scores. Sacyr had the highest technical score
with 4089 points (out of a possible 5500), ACS - 3974 points,
and Bechtel - 3790 points. The technical points ranking was
"shocking" to a representative of CH2MHill (an
American-firm), the Project Advisor for the expansion
program. Previously, sources rated Bechtel's and ACS's
technical plans to be about equal and both superior to
Sacyr's. See ref G. The pre-announcement conventional
wisdom on the technical plans was so prevalent that the
audience collectively gasped when the Sacyr high technical
score was announced. During a post-announcment meeting with
the Ambassador, the subdued Bechtel reps speculated that the
technical scoring committee was probably not comfortable with
Bechtel's "innovative" design, because it did not fit neatly
into the ACP's specifications. Bechtel reps dismissed
challenging the technical evaluation process, noting from
past experience that these technical evaluations can be
highly subjective.
¶4. (C) After the award ceremony started, ACP and consortia
officials retrieved the price envelopes from a nearby bank
vault. The audience watched via streaming video projected on
to giant screens, the OJ Simpson-esque drive to/from the bank
and the "signing out" of the deposit box with the envelopes.
The base price proposals were $3.1 billion for Sacyr, $4.2
billion for Bechtel, and $6.0 for ACS, which led to financial
point scores of 4000, 2980, and 2586, respectively. (The
provisional prices were $103 million, $94 million, and $0,
respectively.) The Sacyr base price elicited a cheer from
the audience; many Panamanians are pleased that the locks may
be built for less money than expected. Sacyr supporters
cheered, because their victory was almost assured with the
best technical score and lowest price.
¶5. (C) The spread on the bid prices is surprising. Sacyr was
expected to be the low ball bid (due to its precarious
financial situation and apparent financial backstop from the
Spanish government), but both Bechtel and ACS reps had hinted
to Embassy officials that their bids were just over $4
billion. See ref G. However, the base price proposals lined
up with the three bidding strategies outlined in ref D -
lowball, value, or punt. The fact that ACS's $6 billion bid
was almost double of Sacyr's was not expected and is
interpreted by some as a punt. Bechtel reps state a
consortium cannot even "pour the concrete" for $3.1 billion
and hinted even their $4.2 billion price was closer to a
lowball bid than a value bid. It is widely expected that
during construction, Sacyr will attempt to renegotiate the
price with the ACP.
¶6. (C) After the ACP declared Sacyr the "best value" winner,
the ACP opened the sealed envelope with the price ceiling (la
partida asignada) for the contract. Sacyr offered a base
price below the ACP's $3.5 billion ceiling; as a result,
further negotiation on price between the ACP and Sacyr is not
needed. See ref G.
-------------------------------
NEXT STEPS IN THE AWARD PROCESS
-------------------------------
¶7. (C) The ACP Price Verification Board will now verify that
the process complies with ACP requirements and the ACP
Contracting Officer will proceed to verify the contractor's
qualifications. Both these steps should be pro forma, and
the ACP expects to officially award the contract in a few
business days. Upon announcement of the award, the ACP will
notify all consortia members and allow the evaluation
documents to be examined by all consortia. The winning
consortium must renew its surety bonds within twenty-eight
days. The losing consortia have three days to protest, once
the five day notification period expires. The ACP
Procurement Division must then adjudicate a protest within
thirty days. Whether or not the losing consortia agree with
the ACP decision, the ACP will proceed to sign the contract
with Sacyr. Without defining "work," the ACP requires Sacyr
to begin work seven days after the contract signing.
----------------
BECHTEL PROTEST?
----------------
¶8. (C) Bechtel reps informed the Ambassador that at this time
they only plan to protest the award if they can prove that
Sacyr's $400 million performance and $50 million payment
bonds (that must now by renewed from Zurich) are
counter-guaranteed by a European government and undisclosed.
If the bonds are counter-guaranteed, then Bechtel reps
believe Sacyr and the backing European government(s)
(probably Spain) broke European Union anti-competitiveness
laws by not having this state aid declared. If true and if
the potential remedy is significant, Bechtel might pursue the
matter in court. However, counter-guaranteed surety bonds
are not against the ACP bid rules. See ref H for background
on this issue. However, we can not rule out some other type
of Spanish government guarantee was provided to Sacyr
(outside of the specific action of guaranteeing surety bonds)
that would enable Sacyr access to the credit necessary to
complete the project, preserve Spanish jobs, and prevent a
rumored shock to Spanish banking system that could ensue from
a collapse of Sacyr.
¶9. (C) Bechtel reps were not alarmed over past press leaks
from Impregilo of the Sacyr consortium forecasting Sacyr's
highest technical score and lowest price. They believe the
leaks likely did not reflect undue access to inside
information or skullduggery by the ACP. See ref G. Rather,
the Bechtel rep opined, it was far more likely that Impregilo
was engaging in puffery on the outcome in order to secure
vital new credit.
-------------------
PANAMANIAN REACTION
-------------------
¶10. (C) Overall, the ACP, President Martinelli, and the
Panamanian public are clearly ecstatic about receiving a
prima facie bargain basement price and that a Panamanian
company (CUSA) is part of the Sacyr consortium. However, we
understand there may be lingering doubts by some ACP Board
Members and members of the government that the Sacyr
consortium does not have financial ability to complete the
project. Bechtel reported they had been called to a surprise
meeting with VP/FM Juan Carlos Varela, who was clearly
concerned about the big price spread and suggested the
cabinet needed to ask ACP Administrator Aleman to provide an
explanation.
------------------------
CANAL EXPANSION OVERVIEW
------------------------
¶11. (C) The Panamanian people approved the overall Panama
Canal Expansion project on October 22, 2006 in a National
Referendum and the ACP broke ground on the first related
excavation project on September 3, 2007. The expansion
consists of three major components: construction of the
locks, widening and deepening of the navigational channels,
and deepening Lake Gatun. Of the various major contracts to
complete the expansion, there is now only one left - the
estimated $400 million PAC 4 excavation that includes the
building of a dam. The ACP hopes to complete the expansion
in 2014 for the 100th anniversary of the opening of the
Panama Canal. Whether the expansion is completed on-time and
on-budget may impact the 2014 Panamanian Presidential and
National Assembly elections.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶12. (C) U.S. ECONOMIC IMPACT: Bechtel was expected to
purchase $1.2 to $1.3 billion dollars worth of goods from
U.S. suppliers. Sacyr has not provided post with their
expected U.S. purchases; however, due to Sacyr's close
relationship with European suppliers, the amount of U.S.
exports could be substantially affected. American companies
Montgomery Watson Harza (MWH) and Tetra Tech are minor
partners in Sacyr's consortium; MWH and Tetra Tech have not
requested commercial advocacy.
¶13. (C) LONG TERM: For over a hundred years, the Panama Canal
remained at the core of the United States/Panamanian
relationship. Two-thirds of all ships transiting the canal
are traveling to/from a U.S. port and we retain a fundamental
interest in the successful completion of the expansion
project. However, the Sacyr win marks an increased tide of
Spanish influence in Panama and - for now - injects an
element of uncertainty in to the future of the canal
expansion. What is undisputed, is the pride of Panamanian
officials in moving this project forward under their
sovereignty. See ref I.
STEPHENSON