

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08OTTAWA1059, THE ROLE OF THE PROVINCIAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08OTTAWA1059.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08OTTAWA1059 | 2008-08-08 20:55 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO6814
PP RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHMT RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #1059/01 2212055
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 082055Z AUG 08
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8306
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 OTTAWA 001059
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PREL PGOV CA
SUBJECT: THE ROLE OF THE PROVINCIAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS
REF: OTTAWA 1032 (Federal HR Commission)
¶1. (U) Summary: Canadian provincial human rights commissions and
tribunals administer provincial human rights law, with varying
provisions, procedures, and jurisdictions. While the public has
traditionally viewed these commissions and tribunals as defenders of
human rights, they are coming under increasing criticism, especially
for their work related to hate speech and minority rights. Mission
Canada on July 28 held a DVC with reporting officers from Embassy
and constituent posts on the role and perceptions of the federal and
provincial human rights commissions and tribunals. Reftel discussed
the federal Canadian Human Rights Commission; this message includes
information from Mission Canada poloffs on the commissions and
tribunals in their respective consular districts. End summary.
Procedures and Jurisdictions Differ
-------------------------------------------
¶2. (U) Provincial human rights commissions and/or tribunals
administer provincial human rights laws, with varying provisions,
procedures, and jurisdictions. For example, both British Columbia
and Ontario practice direct-claims models in which complaints
proceed directly to tribunal, while commissions in all other
provinces and the territories provide some form of prior screening
and refer only a limited number of cases to formal adjudication.
Every province administers some type of dispute resolution
mechanism, and most also run human rights education and
discrimination prevention programs.
Atlantic Canada
---------------------
¶3. (U) The human rights commissions in the four Atlantic provinces
focus on complaints dealing with employment situations, physical
disabilities, gender issues, mental disabilities, and age. As
populations in Atlantic Canada are largely homogenous, with between
95 and 99 pct of Atlantic Canadians tracing their roots to the
British Isles and Europe, few cases of racial discrimination feature
in the case-load. The public in Atlantic Canada generally views the
commissions as important to upholding human rights. However, public
opinion towards the role of the commissions in minority rights
cases, especially regarding ethnic and religious rights, is growing
increasingly negative, causing a backlash against those groups that
bring such cases to the commissions. In one controversial case, the
Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission in 2007 ruled that a town
council's decision not to fly the gay pride flag over city hall, and
its policies regarding homosexual rights in general, were contrary
to Nova Scotia's Human Rights Act.
¶4. (SBU) According to Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission Director
and CEO Krista Daley (please protect), disability rights complaints
are the most common, half of which are employment-related cases
involving mental illness. Daley noted that, since the expansion of
the Commission's mandate to apply to aboriginal issues, the
Commission has also seen an increasing number of cases involving
aboriginals. She noted that this mandate change was especially
important for aboriginal women, who can now bring sexual harassment
cases before the Commission. Daley told the Halifax Consul General
that she was frustrated by the "patchwork" of human rights
commissions in each jurisdiction in Canada, all with different
mandates and operations structures. She noted that an individual
living in one province may have the right to bring a case before
his/her commission, but this person may not have the same right in a
different province. For example, British Columbia and Nova Scotia
commissions have jurisdiction over media, but other provincial
Qcommissions have jurisdiction over media, but other provincial
commissions do not. Daley also remarked that human rights
commissions across Canada are under siege in the media due to
misinformation and confusion about their respective mandates,
stemming largely from the Maclean's case, which involves allegations
that Maclean's magazine violated human rights by publishing
allegedly "anti-Islamic" articles and book excerpts written by
author Mark Steyn (reftel). She stated that the provincial
government is considering withdrawing the Nova Scotia Human Rights
Commission's mandate over media cases, and noted that she supported
the move.
Quebec
----------
¶5. (U) The Quebec Human Rights Commission (Commission des droits de
la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) upholds and promotes the
Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms of Quebec. According to Quebec
Human Rights Commission Public Liaison Officer Daniella Robichaud,
the majority of complaints the Commission receives are related to
employment or housing. The Commission resolves the bulk of
inquiries through mediation. The Commission's responsibilities
include: receiving inquires and complaints; conducting
investigations; educating the public about human rights; analyzing
laws, bills and regulations and, when they are contrary to the
Charter, making recommendations to the government; and conducting
OTTAWA 00001059 002 OF 004
and encouraging research and publication on human rights and
freedoms. The Commission also provides support for businesses and
organizations implementing affirmative action programs, a
requirement for companies with over $100,000 in contracts with the
provincial government. The Quebec Human Rights Commission has the
power to initiate investigations, including of the government
itself, without representing a specific complainant. In addition,
the Commission's legal department is required to review all
legislation passed by Quebec's National Assembly to ensure
provincial laws and regulations comply with the Charter of Human
Rights and Freedoms of Quebec. Uniquely, the Commission also has a
mandate to promote and uphold the rights of children under the Youth
Protection Act and the Youth Criminal Justice Act.
¶6. (U) In Quebec, the debate over "reasonable accommodation" since
2006 and the subsequent Bouchard-Taylor Commission's hearings have
largely subsumed dialogue over human rights and heightened ethnic
and religious sensitivities, resulting in a focus on preserving
"Quebecois values." The Commission has contributed to Quebec's
focus on human rights and freedoms by instituting one of the most
active outreach efforts, maintaining an education department that
seeks to engage the community to prevent future human rights
violations. Currently, the Commission is working with the municipal
police to reduce mistreatment of homeless youths in Montreal. It
has also worked with an NGO to publish a booklet for youths on the
rights of those detained or arrested by the police. This fall, the
Commission will establish a telephone hotline dedicated to receiving
complaints of human rights abuses related to reasonable
accommodation.
¶7. (U) In early 2008, the Quebec Human Rights Commission ruled on a
case dealing with the application of U.S. International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR). The Commission ruled that Bell Helicopters
was guilty of practicing discriminatory hiring practices. Bell
argued that its rejection of an internship application from a
Haitian-Canadian dual citizen was in compliance with ITAR
restrictions against hiring citizens of certain countries to work on
U.S. military contracts. Following the Commission's finding (but
before the case reached the tribunal stage) Bell settled with the
complainant. Until a tribunal judge rules decisively on the issues
involved in the case, companies remain at risk of human rights
commissions and tribunals accepting and hearing complaints related
to ITAR compliance.
Ontario
----------
¶8. (U) The Ontario Human Rights Commission received approximately
42,000 complaints in April 2006 through March 2007, of which 2,337
led to formal complaints. More than 56 pct of these complaints
focused on disability-related discrimination, and over 36 pct were
related to race. The Ontario Human Rights Code requires that
complaints be filed within one year of an incident of alleged
discrimination. As of June 2008, the Ontario Human Rights
Commission no longer processes discrimination complaints, which
instead proceed directly to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.
The change is designed to expedite the process and eliminate a case
backlog of between 2 and 4 years. The Ontario Commission has ruled
that it does not have jurisdiction over media-related cases. In the
Maclean's case, while it denounced the magazine for "Islamophobic
portrayals of Muslims" and "promoting destructive, xenophobic
opinions," it dismissed the case, ruling it had no jurisdiction over
print media. According to the Commission, while Section 13 of the
Qprint media. According to the Commission, while Section 13 of the
Ontario Human Rights Code makes it illegal to display or publish
certain kinds of offensive material, its limitations are too narrow
to apply to most cases.
Manitoba
------------
¶9. (U) The Manitoba Human Rights Commission screens complaints,
provides mediation, and refers cases that cannot be otherwise
resolved to independent adjudication in public hearings. Complaints
must be filed within six months of an incident of alleged
discrimination. Cases that proceed to adjudication must have a
significant "public interest" component and the Commission presents
the case at the hearing on behalf of both the Commission and the
complainant. As with the majority of the commissions, the greatest
proportion (80 pct) of complaints relate to employment and
disability. Some 90 pct of Manitoba employers fall under the
Commission's jurisdiction. The Commission also handles complaints
related to aboriginal issues, gender, policing and alleged racial
profiling, particularly of aboriginals. In 2006, the Commission
received 342 inquiries or pre-complaints, of which 297 became formal
complaints and seven went to adjudication.
¶10. (SBU) Representatives of the Manitoba Human Rights Commission
characterize their organization as a proactive, medium-sized agency
that has largely escaped the negative criticism leveled at human
rights commissions in Western Canada. The Commission attributes this
OTTAWA 00001059 003 OF 004
to an active focus on public education, awareness, and community
outreach -- particularly to youth and employers -- as well as to
efforts to partner with academic and community groups to explore,
for example, "the next generation" of human rights issues, including
the environment. The Commission draws a clear distinction between
itself and its Western counterparts with respect to hate speech.
Manitoba Human Rights Commission Executive Director Dianne Scarth
argued that the Commission would not, for example, have accepted the
Maclean's case, due to the narrower scope of the province's human
rights code, as well as to a non-confrontational "different climate"
of public discourse. She noted that the Manitoba Commission was
concerned by the negative publicity generated by the Maclean's case
and, although it ultimately decided not to comment, had considered
issuing a formal public statement regarding its effect on human
rights commissions across the country. In general, the Manitoba
Commission appears enthusiastic about expanding its mandate and its
interpretation of human rights in the province, although it
acknowledges that public opinion is divided over how broad that
mandate should be.
¶11. (U) The federal Canadian Human Rights Commission also maintains
an independent presence in Manitoba in the form of its Aboriginal
Initiative, which has been based in Winnipeg since 2007. The office
is responsible for research and knowledge-building on human rights
issues within federal jurisdiction that affect aboriginal peoples
across Canada. Following the passage of legislation in June 2008
extending the Canadian Human Rights Act to aboriginal peoples
on-reserve, the Aboriginal Initiative is leading the federal
Commission through a three-year transition period to deal with the
expansion of its mandate, develop culturally appropriate dispute
resolution models and redress mechanisms, and raise community
awareness through education and outreach.
Alberta and Saskatchewan
--------------------------------
¶12. (U) Over 95 pct of complaints brought to both the Alberta Human
Rights Commission and the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission are
employment-related, with approximately one third focusing on mental
and physical disabilities and a very small percent dealing with hate
speech. The Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission receives
approximately 300 to 400 cases each year, of which approximately 20
pct relate to discrimination based on ancestry (including
nationality and race), and another 20 pct relate to gender. The
neighboring Alberta Human Rights Commission (which covers a
population of about 3 million people, triple that of Saskatchewan),
receives between 600 and 800 cases per year, of which approximately
34 pct deal with physical disability, 25 pct with gender, and 13 pct
with mental disability. In both provinces, parties resolve the
majority of cases through settlement. The Alberta Human Rights
Commission resolves approximately 97 pct of inquiries through its
reconciliation process, and the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission
referred only eight pct of cases to tribunal between 2006 and 2007.
¶13. (U) While a relatively small number of cases in Alberta and
Saskatchewan involve hate speech, these cases have generated the
most controversy and press coverage, with an increasingly vocal
group of critics in Western Canada suggesting the commissions have
strayed into censorship at the expense of free speech. In one
controversial hate speech case, the Alberta Human Rights Commission
ruled that Stephen Boissoin, who identified himself as a pastor and
Qruled that Stephen Boissoin, who identified himself as a pastor and
executive director of the Concerned Christian Coalition, violated
Alberta's Human Rights, Citizenship and Multiculturalism Act by
publishing statements in a local newspaper "likely to expose
homosexuals" to "hatred and contempt due to their sexual
preference." Boissoin had written a letter published in the Red
Deer Advocate that, he argued, was based on his church's teaching
against homosexual behavior. In May 2007, the Commission ordered
that Boissoin "cease publishing, in newspapers, by email, on the
radio, in public speeches, or on the Internet, in the future,
disparaging remarks about gays and homosexuals," publish a written
apology, and pay $5,000 in damages.
¶14. (U) On August 6, 2008, following a year-long investigation, the
Alberta Human Rights Commission rejected a complaint by the Edmonton
Council of Muslim Communities against former Western Standard
publisher Ezra Levant over his republication of the Danish Muhammad
cartoons. The Commission ruled it would not refer the complaint for
panel hearing, stating that while the cartoons were "stereotypical,
negative and offensive," they were "related to relevant and timely
news" and were "not simply gratuitously included." In February
2008, a Calgary Muslim leader withdrew a similar complaint against
Levant. The complaints generated considerable public debated about
the commission's mandate over hate speech. Since the filing of the
complaints, Ezra Levant has become an outspoken and well-known
critic of the commissions, arguing they are limiting free speech and
restricting freedom of expression.
British Columbia
---------------------
OTTAWA 00001059 004 OF 004
¶15. (U) The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal receives
approximately 11,000 complaints each year, with about 50 to 75 going
to hearing, and parties either dropping or resolving through
mediation the remainder. Approximately 70 pct of complaints are
employment-related. British Columbia re-organized its commission
system in 2005, turning its Human Rights Commission into a tribunal
and stripping the institution of much of its power. Previously, the
commission could represent parties, conduct investigations, and run
educational programs. The tribunal possesses none of these powers.
Cases now proceed almost directly to the complaint stage, and go
through a streamlined process. After receiving a complaint, the
Tribunal offers the parties the option of attending a
tribunal-assisted settlement meeting prior to the respondent filing
a response. A settlement meeting may also take place at any later
stage. In addition, respondents have the right to ask for
dismissal, which allows a tribunal judge to review written evidence
ahead of a hearing to determine validity. In the 2006-2007
reporting year, the Tribunal handled 1,016 complaints, 222 of which
it threw out at initial screening. Of the complaints it received,
61 pct were employment-related. The most common grounds for
discrimination were physical disability, gender (including
pregnancy), and mental disability. The Tribunal settled (either
through mediation or hearing) 44 pct of complaints, did not accept
21 pct for review, and dismissed 19 pct. Parties withdrew or
abandoned 9 pct and 7 pct respectively.
¶16. (SBU) The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal heard testimony
in the Maclean's case in early June 2008 and is currently
deliberating, with a decision not likely for several months,
possibly as late as December 2008. The Tribunal received written
submissions in the case up to the beginning of July. The Maclean's
case is only the second complaint to be brought under the
discriminatory publications provisions of the British Columbia Human
Rights Code. Officials informally commented to Poloff that the case
proceeded to the hearing stage largely because neither party would
agree to mediation, and because Maclean's refused to file an
application for dismissal of the case, implying that both sides were
looking to gain publicity for their causes.
BREESE