

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05HELSINKI1047, CODEL HOBSON VISIT TO FINLAND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05HELSINKI1047.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05HELSINKI1047 | 2005-09-29 13:55 | 2011-04-24 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Helsinki |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HELSINKI 001047
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OREP ENRG PREL FI EUN
SUBJECT: CODEL HOBSON VISIT TO FINLAND
------------------------
Introduction and Summary
------------------------
¶1. Summary. CODEL Hobson -- House Appropriations Energy and
Water Development Subcommittee Chairman David Hobson (R-OH),
Representative Ed Pastor (D-AZ), Representative Marion Berry
(D-AR), Representative James Clyburn (D-SC), and
Representative Phil Gingrey (R-GA) -- visited Finland,
August 18-21. On August 19, the CODEL met with Taisto
Turunen, Director General, Energy Department, Ministry of
Trade and Industry (MTI). Turunen warmly welcomed the
Delegation to Finland and Representative Hobson remarked
that one of the Delegation's principal objectives was to
learn more about Finland's nuclear energy policy, including
its nuclear waste disposal strategies. More specifically,
Representative Hobson argued that the United States has a
unique "window of opportunity" to re-think the direction of
its own nuclear energy policy in an effort to confront
rising gasoline prices and curb fossil fuel emissions. The
Delegation also visited Eurajoki for briefings on the new
Olkiluoto nuclear power plant, its repository for reactor
operating waste, and an underground rock characterization
and research facility. The Delegation concluded its visit
with a briefing by the Director-General of Finland's
Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK), Jukka
Laaksonen. End Summary.
¶2. Issues covered during the visit included Finland's
national nuclear energy and nuclear waste disposal
strategies; selection and licensing processes for repository
sites; the process for securing municipality support for
repository construction; radiation standards for licensing
repositories; canister design, transportation and storage;
and Finland's future nuclear energy strategies.
¶3. The Finns, who now are building a fifth nuclear reactor
in Eurajoki (and the first nuclear power plant on either
side of the Atlantic in at least a decade), agreed with the
CODEL that nuclear power has an important role to play in
the search for cleaner (low carbon) energy sources. They
stressed, however, that every country had to devise its own
strategies for managing nuclear energy and waste
requirements. The Finnish "experience" was hardly
applicable for the United States as geographical,
geological, and meteorological factors in both countries
were different, not to mention the existence of diverse
political and legislative systems in both countries. The
national consensus in Finland was to pursue a nuclear energy
policy that reduced carbon dioxide emissions and increased
nuclear power production to meet the greenhouse gas emission
targets set for Finland in the Kyoto Protocol. In addition,
the Finns highlighted the cost effectiveness of their
nuclear energy policy and its market/consumer-driven nature
that relies on extensive input from all the principal
players in Finland's public and private sectors.
--------------------------------------------- ---
Meeting with MTI Director General Taisto Turunen
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶4. Turunen gave the CODEL a brief overview of the
production, consumption, and supply trends underpinning
Finland's energy policy. He explained that Finland's energy
sector is driven by active market forces in the highly
competitive Nordic region. (Note: The Electricity Market
Act, which came into force in 1995, has resulted in the
deregulation of the Finnish electricity market for three
million electricity consumers, thus allowing them to choose
the sources of their electricity supply.) Representative
Pastor asked about which authority sets electricity prices
in Finland; in response, Turunen noted that there was no
regulation of electricity prices as they were driven by the
market. Representative Hobson inquired about the sources of
financing for Finland's nuclear power plants and Turunens
reply emphasized the role of the private sector and
consumers as the primary financiers. He said that the
Finnish Government does not provide any economic
contributions or financial guarantees for the project.
¶5. Turunen further remarked that Finlands high energy
consumption is attributable to the energy-intensive
structure of Finnish industry, high standards of living, a
very cold climate, and long transportation distances.
Finland remains heavily dependent on imported energy, which
in 2004 accounted for 67 per cent of all energy consumed in
the country. (Note: Finland imports electricity from
Norway, Russia and Sweden.) To meet Finlands current and
future energy requirements, Turunen said that the Finnish
government was forced to examine other sources of energy,
y,
such as nuclear power and biofuels. Finnish forecasts
predict that the construction of Finlands third nuclear
power plant in Eurajoki (Olkiluoto site) with an output of
1600 MW will be completed in 2009. With its completion,
nuclear power will undoubtedly emerge as one of Finlands
principal energy sources. Turunen dismissed the notion, at
this time, that Finland had plans to build a sixth nuclear
power plant.
¶6. During Turunens presentation, Representative Hobson
also emphasized the importance of attracting American
university students into highly technical fields, such as
nuclear engineering, and inquired whether the Finnish
educational system produced enough graduates in these
specialized areas. Turunen replied that there were no
shortages of qualified engineering students in Finland. He
also noted with some pride that Finlands nuclear energy
policy was widely accepted by the Finnish public. (Note:
Turunen cited a 46 per cent approval rate and 25 per cent
ent
disapproval rate for nuclear power in Finland. High
approval ratings appear to be rooted in the widespread
belief amongst the Finnish public that nuclear power remains
safe as there have been no minor or major nuclear
environmental incidents in Finland thus far. End note.)
¶7. Representative Pastor asked about the licensing
processes for the new nuclear power plant, specifically, who
was responsible for the authorization of the construction
license. Turunen replied that the Council of State grants
the license and, in reply, Representative Hobson made the
observation that there were far too many legal challenges to
licensing applications in the United States. Turunen argued
that the Finnish way: the achievement of a popular
national consensus on any given issue precluded any
effective legal motions to block government plans in the
nuclear energy policy area.
--------------------------------------
Visit to Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant
--------------------------------------
¶8. The CODEL next met with Posivas Communications Manager,
Timo Seppala. Posiva is responsible for the
characterization of sites for final disposal of spent
nuclear fuel and the eventual construction and operation of
the repository. It is owned by Fortum (60 per cent stake),
a leading energy company in the Nordic countries and Baltic
rim, as well as TVO (40 per cent stake), an electricity
production company. The CODEL was given an opportunity to
speak to local politicians and businessmen from the
municipality and a trade promoter about the nature of their
political decision making processes and location and safety
issue deliberations. (Note: Each Finnish participant was in
favor of the construction of a new nuclear plant and
repository.) The politicians stressed the important role
the local municipality played during the initial and final
consultations to locate another nuclear power plant and
nuclear fuel repository at the Olkiluoto site. The
politicians remarked that unemployment was high in the
region (10.6 per cent) and that there was an economic
rationale for building another power plant and repository on
the same site. The local municipality also hoped that the
creation of new jobs would, in turn, stimulate the local
economic environment.
¶9. The CODEL was given a unique opportunity to visit
Olkiluotos low and intermediate level waste repository.
Completed in 1992, the repository was built to house all the
operational waste that is produced during the operating life
of the present Olkiluoto nuclear power units. Once the
waste generated by these plants has been disposed of the
tunnels and shafts leading to the repositories will be
filled and sealed. The CODEL asked Seppala to explain the
components of the final disposal canister; he, in turn,
referred the CODEL to the model of a final disposal canister
which had a double-layered copper/cast iron construction and
cost approximately $120,000 each.
¶10. The CODELs brief drive-by visit to a deep underground
rock characterization and research facility (ONKALO) was an
opportunity for Seppala to discuss the nature of the site
confirmation investigations for spent fuel disposal. Posiva
aims to have the repository operational by 2020 so that
disposal can commence.
--------------------------------------------- -------
Meeting with STUKs Director General Jukka Laaksonen
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶11. Laaksonen gave an extensive presentation on the
management of nuclear waste in Finland. He stressed the
need for the safe disposal of nuclear waste and spent fuel
by using proven, current technologies as well as the desire
not to leave nuclear waste as a burden for future
generations. His support for what he described as an
ethical dimension of Finlands nuclear energy policy became
obvious when he noted that this generation must take care
of its own waste. He also pointed out that it was critical
critical
for Finland to manage its nuclear waste without foreign
support. In this context, he highlighted the continued
relevance of the two major principles underlying Finlands
Nuclear Energy Act (1994): (1) nuclear waste generated in
Finland shall be handled, stored and permanently disposed of
in Finland, and (2) nuclear waste generated elsewhere than
in Finland, shall not be handled, stored or permanently
disposed of in Finland.
¶12. Finland currently provides for the permanent disposal
of low and medium level nuclear waste at two disposal
repositories (Olkiluoto and Loviisa), which are located at a
depth of 60-100 meters. There are plans to store spent fuel
in a new repository located in Olkiluoto (to be completed in
2020) at a depth of 500 meters. When asked by a CODEL
staffer to compare U.S. and Finnish permanent disposal
plans, Laaksonen noted that Finlands plan took all factors,
technical and political into account. Representative Hobson
son
asked whether STUK had examined French recycling efforts as
an option for disposing spent fuel. Laaksonen argued that
cost factors prohibited the implementation of a similar
operation in Finland. Hobson also argued that it would be
useful for the United States to launch a review of whether
more cost effective alternatives could be found for nuclear
waste disposal canisters. Laaksonen replied that STUK was
confident that double-layered copper/cast iron disposal
canisters, placed in a bed of bentonite, offered the safest
and most effective protection for the disposal of nuclear
waste.
¶13. When asked by Representative Hobson whether any Finnish
lawyers ever challenged the government about its nuclear
energy or waste disposal policies, Laaksonen remarked that
Finnish lawyers were not as powerful as in the United States
and that hardly any issue pertaining to this area ever ended
up in the Finnish court system. The CODEL acknowledged with
great interest Laaksonens remark that national governments
were rejecting efforts by the EU to coordinate European
guidelines for nuclear energy and nuclear waste disposal.
According to Laaksonen, the only pertinent international
organization was the International Atomic Energy Agency,
whose guidelines Finland adhered to.
¶14. The CODEL has cleared this cable.
MACK
K