

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON92, NZ EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME UNDER REVIEW
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON92.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON92 | 2009-04-09 02:11 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO3135
RR RUEHAST RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHLN RUEHMA RUEHPB RUEHPOD RUEHTM RUEHTRO
DE RUEHWL #0092/01 0990211
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 090211Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5825
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1948
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5488
RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA 0555
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0827
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
RUEHZN/ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000092
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV PGOV KGHG NZ
SUBJECT: NZ EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME UNDER REVIEW
WELLINGTON 00000092 001.2 OF 003
Reftel: 08 Wellington 695
¶1. (SBU) Summary. On December 9, 2008, the newly elected
National-led Government announced its review of the country's
Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). Established by the previous Labour
government, the ETS attracted criticism from many quarters,
including the National Party, for its lack of political consensus
and its potentially adverse impact on economic growth. Insiders
predict that any new legislation will not repeal the existing ETS
but rather amend it to give greater weight to its economic impact.
A harmonized approach to emissions trading with Australia is seen as
desirable by National and both governments have begun to jointly
study this option. End Summary.
PM Key Favors Fiscally Prudent ETS
----------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) Prime Minister John Key believes that humans have
contributed to global warming and that New Zealand should have an
effective system to reduce the country's greenhouse gas emissions
and enable the trading of emission reduction credits. However, PM
Key has stated that he will only support such a system if it does
not punitively impact the New Zealand economy. Before the 2008
election, Key's opposition National Party was critical of the
previous Labour Government's Climate Change Response Amendment Act
2008, which established New Zealand's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)
(reftel). Key argued that Labour's ETS was established without the
due diligence and political debate required to form the political
consensus essential to address a significantly long-term issue, such
as climate change. Additionally, Key asserted that any ETS should
have as a fundamental consideration its impact on domestic economic
growth.
ETS Still in Place, but Under Comprehensive Review
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶3. (SBU) Following the November 2008 election, the newly formed
National-led government chose not to repeal ETS, but rather to
initiate a parliamentary study of the program. On December 9, 2008,
Key announced the creation of a Select Committee of Inquiry (Review
Committee) to review the ETS and consider alternative mechanisms for
addressing climate change. This announcement honored a commitment
made to the hard-right ACT Party to secure its support in forming a
government after the election. While the Review Committee conducts
its examination, the ETS program will remain in force despite
pressure from ACT to suspend its operation. However, the first
stage of the ETS emissions reduction timetable does not commence
until 2010, which leaves some time to review and amend the program.
Scope of ETS Review Committee Inquiry
-------------------------------------
¶4. (U) The Review Committee has announced that, during the course
of its inquiry, it will:
- Hear views from trade and diplomatic experts on the international
relations aspects of this issue;
- Consider the prospects for an international agreement on climate
change post-Kyoto 1, and the form such an agreement might take;
- Require a high-quality, quantified regulatory impact analysis to
identify the net benefits or costs to New Zealand of any policy
action, including international relations and commercial benefits
and costs;
- To identify the central/benchmark projections which are being
used as the motivation for international agreements to combat
climate change; and consider the uncertainties and risks surrounding
these projections;
- Consider the impact on the New Zealand economy and New Zealand
households of any climate change policies, having regard to the weak
state of the economy, the need to safeguard New Zealand's
international competitiveness, the position of trade-exposed
industries, and the actions of competing countries;
- Examine the relative merits of a mitigation or adaptation
approach to climate change for New Zealand;
- Consider the case for increasing resources devoted to New
Zealand-specific climate change research;
WELLINGTON 00000092 002.2 OF 003
- Examine the relative merits of an emissions trading scheme versus
a tax on carbon or energy as a New Zealand response to climate
change;
- Consider the need for any additional regulatory interventions to
combat climate change, whether through an ETS or a new form of
taxation, such as a carbon tax; and
- Consider the timing of the introduction of any New Zealand
measures, with particular reference to the outcome of the December
2009 Copenhagen meeting, the position of the United States, and
actions by the Australian government.
Committee Composition and Timeline
----------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) The Review Committee is comprised of members from many of
the political parties sitting in Parliament with a view to obtaining
a balanced consideration of and consensus on other alternatives.
National, as Parliament's biggest party, has four seats; Labour
three seats; the Green Party, Maori Party, ACT and United Future all
have one seat.
¶6. (SBU) In an unusual move, Key appointed a minister outside of
Cabinet, United Future leader Peter Dunne, to chair Review
Committee. Dunne is Revenue Minister and Associate Health Minister.
It is an unusual appointment because ministers do not usually sit
on committees involving legislation. Key justified the appointment
on the grounds that Dunne is an experienced member of Parliament and
generally considered neutral on this issue. Although the Green
Party questioned how neutral a government minister could be in the
position of chair, Dunne's appointment was generally well-received
inside and outside of parliament. Dunne is pro-ETS and soon after
his appointment stated that "New Zealand needs a robust emissions
trading scheme in place as quickly as possible to reassure
businesses and shore-up our international credibility".
¶7. (U) The Committee held its first meeting on December 18, 2008
and has met several times since. It plans to report back to
Parliament in April/May 2009. The Government intends to pass any
proposed legislation by September 30, 2009, before the scheduled
implementation of the existing ETS program that begins in 2010.
Three Possible Outcomes of the ETS Review
-----------------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) Rob Eaddy, Chief of Staff to Committee Chair Dunne,
offered post three possible scenarios at the conclusion of the
Review Committee process. The most likely outcome, according to
Eaddy, is a proposal to revise the existing ETS in a manner that
earns broad political support and which gives more consideration to
the impact on the domestic economy. Another scenario posited by
Eaddy involves the Committee recommending the imposition of a carbon
tax in lieu of the carbon market feature within an ETS. However,
Eaddy believed this to be the least likely scenario.
¶9. (SBU) Eaddy's third scenario is one in which Australia and New
Zealand create a tandem scheme that recognizes the strengths and
weaknesses of their respective economies. Eaddy added that this
outcome has long been Key's most favored solution and revealed that
Key canvassed this concept with Australian PM Kevin Rudd when they
met on March 2 in Sydney.
GNZ and GOA Announce Talks to Harmonize Plans
---------------------------------------------
¶10. (SBU) Meanwhile, as the Review Committee works toward a
proposed solution, the GNZ and GOA are looking seriously at the
harmonization option. On March 20, NZ Climate Change Minister Nick
Smith and Australia Minister for Climate Change and Water Penny Wong
announced the establishment of a trans-Tasman working group to
explore harmonization of their countries' respective emissions
reduction and carbon trading regimes. According to Smith and Wong,
options include everything from common adoption of key design
elements to a full harmonization. No timelines were set by Smith
and Wong.
¶11. (SBU) Leading NZ business journalist Brian Fallow has, however,
expressed doubt that NZ and Australia can easily reconcile
differences in their respective approaches towards emissions
trading. Fallow asserted that beyond the political rhetoric lays
the reality of various stumbling blocks that may make harmonization
WELLINGTON 00000092 003.2 OF 003
very difficult or perhaps unfeasible under policies. Fallow cited
differences between the two countries in how they each plan to meet
Kyoto targets and how emission units would be traded.
Political Parties on ETS Review
-------------------------------
¶12. (SBU) National's support partner, the ACT Party, opposes any
form of an ETS. ACT believes carbon trading is prone to fraud and
that no case has yet been made to prove that the benefits of an ETS
would exceed the costs. The Labour Party and the Green Party have
both offered to work with the Government on an amended ETS.
Labour's Climate Change spokesman Charles Chauvel acknowledges that
the governing National Party is firmly in the driver's seat on the
ETS review. [Note. Even Labour and the Greens, who have
historically advanced strong pro-environment policies, now realize
that their positions must take into account the realities of the
present global economic situation and its impact on achievable
environmental goals. End Note]. Minister Smith welcomed the Labour
and the Greens respective offers and reaffirmed the Government's
desire to build political consensus on how best to tackle climate
change. Jim Anderton, the solitary Progressive Party MP, supports
an ETS, as does the Review Committee Chair Peter Dunne, United
Future's only MP. The Maori Party has yet to articulate a position
on the ETS.
Insights on NZ's Post-Kyoto Negotiations
----------------------------------------
¶13. (SBU) Tim Groser, New Zealand's Minister for International
Climate Change Negotiations, expressed his disappointment in a March
23 media interview that the December 2008 Posnan talks yielded
little progress toward negotiation of a post-Kyoto agreement.
According to Groser, the best that can be achieved in the Copenhagen
talks planned for December 2009 will be some kind of framework
agreement.
¶14. (SBU) Groser also discussed New Zealand's perspective as it
enters into post-Kyoto negotiations. NZ's greenhouse gas emissions
are "massively in excess of our Kyoto obligations", according to
Groser, "and taking on even more ambitious targets is a tough ask."
In addition, he commented that NZ is uniquely and badly placed among
Kyoto signatories because "there is no technical fix for methane
emitted from livestock." NZ must, stated Groser, take into account
the large percentage of NZ greenhouse gas emissions that are
generated by agriculture (49 percent), and the unavailability of
technology that would allow NZ to reduce those emissions.
¶15. (SBU) Another issue for New Zealand in future negotiations is
forestry, said Groser. He explained that the Kyoto rules assume
that all carbon from trees is released as soon as the trees are cut
down, but that is not true. Consequently, Kyoto imposes a penalty
when trees are cut down, even though they are replanted in another
place. That result penalizes New Zealand, which wants to transfer
more of its forests to marginal hill country.
Comment
-------
¶16. (SBU) Given the current economic situation and the GNZ's desire
to avoid any measures that could negatively affect NZ's export
earnings (which are predominately agriculturally based), we
anticipate the GNZ will study this issue carefully and delay as long
as politically possible the implementation of ETS measures for the
ag sector. The public and much of the political clamor for New
Zealand to meet its Kyoto obligations have quieted since the global
financial crisis. New Zealand environmentalists and the small band
of dogmatic pro-environment politicians are likely to press the
Government towards committing to firm targets in the lead up to
Copenhagen, while NZ and Australia officials examine what is
realistic for both their economies. End Comment.
Keegan