

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07WELLINGTON847, FONTERRA - NEW ZEALAND'S LARGEST COMPANY PLANS TO
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07WELLINGTON847.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07WELLINGTON847 | 2007-12-07 05:07 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO5866
PP RUEHCHI RUEHFK RUEHHM RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHPB RUEHRN
DE RUEHWL #0847/01 3410507
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 070507Z DEC 07
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4937
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC PRIORITY
INFO RUEHXQ/ALL EUROPEAN UNION POST PRIORITY
RUEHZU/ASIAN PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION PRIORITY
RUEHSS/OECD POSTS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 5043
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0301
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND PRIORITY 1561
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY PRIORITY 0613
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY 0197
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC PRIORITY 0370
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 WELLINGTON 000847
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
EAP/ANP, EEB/TPP/ABT, STATE PASS TO FAS KHALIKA MEARDY -
OCRA, PAUL KIENDL - OGA, JIM DEVER - OFSO, COMMERCE FOR
ITA/MAC/AP/OSAO, PACOM FOR JO1E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQSTATE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ECON EFIN ETRD PREL NZ XV
SUBJECT: FONTERRA - NEW ZEALAND'S LARGEST COMPANY PLANS TO
FLOAT FIRST INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING
WELLINGTON 00000847 001.2 OF 005
¶1. Note: This is a joint Foreign Agricultural Service and
State report. End note.
¶2. Summary. Fonterra Co-operative Ltd, New Zealand's
largest company is beginning a two-year consultation with its
farmer shareholders whether to approve a preferred capital
restructuring option. If approved, Fonterra would transfer
its assets, liabilities and operations to a separate company
that would be listed on the stock exchange in 2010. Outside
investors could purchase up to 20 percent of the shares,
which would enable Fonterra to raise capital for planned
expansion into overseas markets, primarily China, other
countries in Asia, and South America. Fifteen percent of the
shares would be provided to existing farmer shareholders and
the remaining 65 per cent would be held by the co-op.
Fonterra controls nearly 40 percent of global trade in dairy
exports, and its 2007 assets of NZ$12.6 billion (US$10.1
billion) and revenue of NZ$13.9 billion (US$11.2 billion)
mean it could eclipse the currently largest listed company on
the New Zealand Stock Exchange - Telecom. While potential
investors have responded positively to the plan, Wall St.
expressed cautious optimism but the initial reaction of
farmer shareholders has been mixed. End summary.
Who Is Fonterra
---------------
¶3. The Fonterra Co-operative Group was formed by the merger
of New Zealand Dairy Group, Kiwi Co-operative Dairies, and
the New Zealand Dairy Board in late 2001. The group is owned
by its 11,000 dairy farmer shareholders and is the world's
largest exporter of dairy products, exporting 95 percent of
New Zealand's production. Fonterra controls about 40 per
cent of world dairy trade and exports to more than 140
countries with 32 per cent going to Asia, 25 per cent to the
Americas, and 21 per cent to Oceania. With its 2007 assets
amounting to US$10.1 billion and revenue of US$11.2 billion
Fonterra could eclipse the currently largest listed company
on the New Zealand Stock Exchange - Telecom. Fonterra is
considered a "partnership model" because of the growing
number of foreign companies with which it has established
partnerships. This strategy enables it to access dairy
markets where dairy demand is met by local supply.
Partnerships, such as joint ventures, give Fonterra market
access without major capital investments and financial risks,
while providing mutual benefits to both companies.
¶4. In North America, Fonterra has already teamed with Dairy
Farmers of America, the largest farmer-owned dairy
cooperative in the U.S. The resulting partnership,
DairiConcepts, produces and markets milk protein
concentrates. Fonterra has also entered into an agreement
with Dairy America, a federated marketing cooperative, to
serve as the marketing agent for the nonfat dry milk received
from its members (seven U.S. farmer-owned dairy
cooperatives). In the U.S. market, Fonterra is a buyer and
an exporter of U.S. nonfat dry milk to other foreign markets.
Its other partnerships include joint ventures with Nestle
through Dairy Partners Americas in South America, Arla Foods
in the United Kingdom, Clover Industries in South Africa, and
Britannia Industries in India. Fonterra is the world's
largest dairy ingredients company, but is also a supplier of
consumer branded products, such as its Anchor brand butter,
Anlene brand milk powders, and Mainland brand cheese
products. Fonterra has a major stake in the Australian dairy
company, Bonlac Foods Limited, and has undertaken the formal
merger of both companies' consumer products operations in
Australia and New Zealand.
Fonterra Announces IPO
----------------------
¶5. On November 15, 2007, Fonterra, the largest company by
WELLINGTON 00000847 002.2 OF 005
turnover in New Zealand and the world's fifth largest dairy
company by revenue, presented for consideration to its
members, six options for a fundamental capital restructuring,
including the Fonterra Board's preferred option that would
result in the co-operative listing its business operations in
a separate company, while maintaining a controlling interest.
Under the preferred option, initially farmers would own
about 80 per cent of the listed entity, 65 per cent through
the co-operative and around 15 per cent through their own
shareholding in the listed entity. The remaining 20 per cent
would be available to the public. Fonterra wants to change
its capital structure to address three pressures on its
current structure - redemption risk, investment choice for
farmers, and the need for a secure and expanding capital base
to implement its growth strategy. The preferred (i.e.,
announced) option was the only one of six the Board
considered that would achieve all three goals.
¶6. Two years of consultations and two rounds of shareholder
voting will be required in order to implement the initial
public offering (IPO). In May of 2008, Fonterra's 11,000
shareholders will vote on whether to allow Fonterra to change
to the two-entity structure and to adopt a more transparent
milk pricing system. The milk price system will be used to
determine the price by which the co-op transfers milk
produced by shareholders to the new company. The second
vote, which will probably be around May 2010, will determine
whether to let Fonterra list on the stock exchange in order
to generate external capital. In both ballots, 75% of
shareholders must vote to approve the measures.
¶7. Of the six options presented to members by the Fonterra
Board, the preferred option was the only one that would
achieve all three goals of implementing growth strategy,
reduce risk, and create flexible investment choices for
farmers. The start of the consultation process comes two
months after Fonterra announced a record payout to suppliers
of NZ$6.40 (US$5.12) per kilogram of milk solids. "While
NZ$6.40 (US$5.12) is good for farmers, it doesn't give the
Co-operative the capital to implement our strategy," said
Fonterra's Chairman, van der Heyden. "It may lessen the
redemption risk for a while, but that is debatable because
our shareholders can choose to redeem their shares regardless
of the level of payout. And NZ$6.40 (US$5.12) does nothing
to address shareholder investment choice," per van der Heyden.
Pre-Conditions for Fonterra Listing on Stock Market
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶8. The following conditions must be met before the IPO can
be launched:
- 75 per cent farmer shareholder approval to create parent
co-op and operating subsidiary and a transparent milk
pricing system (to be voted on by 11,000 Fonterra farmer
shareholders in May 2008).
- A competitive milk pricing mechanism.
- Superior business performance across Fonterra.
- Acceptable share market conditions.
- Acceptable listing value for current shareholders.
- Acceptable legislation to support necessary changes.
- 75 per cent farmer shareholder approval in second vote
(expected around 2010) of listing and raising external
capital.
Floating Fonterra: Process, Structure, Safeguards
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶9. The process calls for two years of consultations and two
shareholder votes. The first vote is scheduled for May 2008.
Fonterra farmer shareholders will vote on: splitting
Fonterra into two entities - a parent co-op and a separate
company with manufacturing and marketing responsibilities;
WELLINGTON 00000847 003.2 OF 005
and a milk pricing system that determines the price for
transferring milk from the co-op. The second and final vote
is expected around May 2010. Shareholders will vote on
listing on the stock market and raising external capital. In
both votes, 75 percent approval of shareholders is required
for the measures to pass. The two-year consultation process
will provide farmers with a chance to assess how the milk
pricing system is working before voting on the listing
option.
¶10. Under the preferred option, the assets, liabilities and
operations of the current co-operative would be shifted to
the new company. The co-op and its farmer owners would
retain a 65 percent stake, 15 percent would be distributed to
farmers, and an additional 20 percent would be issued to
external shareholders. Farmers would have the option of
selling their shares on the stock market or keeping them.
¶11. The preferred option includes contractual,
constitutional and legislative safeguards to help ensure New
Zealand farmer majority ownership and New Zealand control.
These include:
- The new company will contract with the co-op to pick up all
milk produced by shareholders, maintain adequate processing
facilities, and adhere to a milk pricing agreement.
- Only the co-op will be allowed to own more than 10 percent
of shares.
- The co-op will not be able to own less than 50.1 percent
without a 75 percent approval vote.
- The minimum co-op stake will be 35 percent.
- 50.1 per cent of shares must be held exclusively by New
Zealanders, even if the co-op's stake drops to 35 percent.
- The co-op will have a board comprised of eight farmer
directors and two independent directors.
- The co-op board will have the power to appoint the board of
the new company, which will consist of six farmer and four
independent directors.
- The two boards will share the same chairman and four farmer
directors.
- Fonterra headquarters will remain in New Zealand.
- Only New Zealand dairy farmers will be able to be
shareholders of the co-op.
Rationale: "Behind the Borders"
-------------------------------
¶12. Of all of the options considered, the preferred option
reportedly best ensures that Fonterra will be able to raise
capital at a competitive cost. It is estimated that NZ$2 to
$3 billion (US$1.8 to $2.4 billion) could be raised through
the share offering, which would enable Fonterra to pursue its
growth strategy of expanding in the fastest growing markets
around the world, including South America, China and other
countries in Asia. In these markets, there is strong demand
for fresh milk and Fonterra's strategy is to supply this
demand by building profitable businesses in those countries
by using locally-produced milk. In New Zealand, this
strategy is commonly referred to as a "behind the borders"
approach.
¶13. The preferred option also enables Fonterra to address
redemption risk, which is significant. Farmers that supply
Fonterra must purchase fair value shares proportional to the
amount of milk supplied. These shares are fully redeemable
if producers decide to cease supplying Fonterra. Because of
the way the Fonterra cooperative was initially set up with a
fair value shares system, Fonterra has virtually no permanent
capital. The total value of all fair value shares represents
the entire equity capital of Fonterra. By issuing
non-redeemable, tradable shares that can be listed on the
stock market, Fonterra would be able to minimize redemption
risk. However, that solution opens them up to the risk that
WELLINGTON 00000847 004.2 OF 005
the market could drive down the company's value.
Wall Street Reaction
--------------------
¶14. Following the news of the planned restructure, Fitch
Ratings announced it retained a negative outlook for the
dairy giant and assigned its AA- (minus) credit rating.
Standard & Poor's has reassessed Fonterra's rating and
downgraded the outlook to a slightly negative, continuing the
rating agencies' declining assessment of Fonterra begun a
year ago based then on merger problems. Fonterra wants to
maintain the highest positive ratings, but the rating
agencies said the risks created by the co-operative's new
proposals have slightly weakened its positive profile. In a
worse case scenario in a share market arrangement, market
analysts posit that farmer-suppliers could be "left in the
cold," i.e., standing last in line of potential creditors to
be paid. Currently, the annual milk payments are Fonterra's
single biggest business cost. Under a revised capital
restructure Fonterra would be able to raise capital to fund
growth, rather than rely on debt, and would reduce redemption
risk (more outside shareholders to hold risk). A Fitch
analyst warned that while the capital restructuring has
credit-enhancing features, it also requires a restructuring
of the milk supply arrangements - potentially leading to a
significant diminution in Fonterra's financial flexibility.
¶15. According to newspaper reports, a listed Fonterra would
be worth between NZ$8.6 (US$6.9) and NZ$10 billion (US $8
billion), making it the largest company on the New Zealand
stock market. (The next largest company is Telecom valued at
NZ$7.7 billion (US$6.15).) Many in the industry expect the
fair value share of Fonterra stocks owned by current
shareholders to go down by approximately 35 percent because
the cooperative's equity will be distributed - 15 percent to
farmers and 20 percent to new investors.
Initial Reaction by Dairy Farmers
----------------------------------
¶16. Despite the safeguards in the proposal and reassurances
from Finance Minister Michael Cullen that Fonterra's plan
would be in New Zealand's best interests, the initial
reaction from farmers is mixed with most indicating that they
need more information before they can make a decision. How
the milk transfer price between the co-op and the new company
will be determined is a key concern as this will determine
how much of the operational subsidiary's after costs revenue
will be passed on to producers in the form of higher milk
prices and how much will be passed on to investors in the
form of higher profits. The new board will be in the
unenviable position of trying to balance the desires of
farmers, who will want the highest possible milk price, and
external investors, who will want the highest possible
dividend. Under the current system, virtually all of
Fonterra's revenue is passed on to dairy producers in the
form of higher milk prices.
¶17. A team in Fonterra is working on a system to calculate
the milk transfer price and aims to put a proposal before
farmers in the next couple of months. Because there's no
open market determined price for milk in New Zealand, coming
up with a suitable mechanism that is transparent, competitive
and fair will be tricky. According to Fonterra, the new
system will build on the approach used by Duff & Phelps, the
company that calculates the fair value of Fonterra shares.
Farmers will need to be convinced that this system protects
their interests before they vote to approve the listing plan.
WELLINGTON 00000847 005.2 OF 005
¶18. Another concern among Fonterra shareholders is the
issue of non-farmer dominance and encroaching foreign direct
investment. While the scheme presented to stakeholders would
have contractual and legislative safeguards to protect farmer
control, along with New Zealand farmer majority ownership,
many farmers are questioning whether these safeguards are
adequate. While the proposed governance structure is
intended to ensure farmer concerns are addressed, many see an
inherent conflict of interest in the way boards are set up.
Others have expressed concern that the co-op will still be
exposed to significant redemption risk and capital management
issues, which, in the minds of some could lead to a sell off
of shares and increased external control, especially if there
is a drop in the milk pay out price. (Note: If the milk pay
out price drops and there is a loss of supply, the co-op
would potentially be forced to sell shares to fund the
farmers exiting the system. End note.) Another frequently
heard complaint is that the Fonterra announcement was "big on
spin" but "short on hard facts."
¶19. Comment: Fonterra's IPO, if successful, will have a major
impact on the New Zealand economy but its impact on the
global dairy market is not expected to be that significant.
The success of the Fonterra IPO proposal depends largely on
New Zealand milk producers being persuaded that Fonterra's
"behind the borders" approach is the appropriate way forward
and that their search for capital should extend to the
riskier equity market. In the minds of many analysts, access
to the capital markets through an IPO to expand Fonterra's
overseas markets and maintaining exclusive domestic control
of Fonterra are two mutually exclusive propositions. The
interests of NZ dairy producers may ultimately be at odds
with outside (international) shareholders. Throughout the
early planning stages of the IPO proposal, New Zealand
government officials from the Ministry of Agriculture and
Forestry along with the Treasury had been in close
consultations with Fonterra's Board in order to ensure
national interests were adequately considered. New Zealand
dairy farmers are yet to be convinced that the plan is in
their interest.
McCormick