

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA2970, CANADIAN STAKEHOLDERS' CONCERNS ON COPYRIGHT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA2970.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA2970 | 2005-10-04 18:21 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
041821Z Oct 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 002970
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DEPT PASS USTR FOR CHANDLER AND ESPINEL
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD KIPR CA
SUBJECT: CANADIAN STAKEHOLDERS' CONCERNS ON COPYRIGHT
AMENDMENT, SPECIAL 301 OCR, AND ENFORCEMENT
REF: A. OTTAWA 2833 (DEMARCHE ON SPECIAL 301
OUT-OF-CYCLE REVIEW)
¶B. SECSTATE 173476 (DEMARCHE ON SPECIAL 301
OUT-OF-CYCLE REVIEW)
¶C. OTTAWA 1168 (CANADIAN REACTION TO GOC'S PROPOSED
COPYRIGHT LAW AMENDMENTS)
¶1. (SBU) Summary: We have met again with intellectual
property (IP) rightsholders to discuss their views of GOC
moves on IPR. Canadian industry frustration with ineffective
IPR enforcement continues to grow, and further review of the
proposed copyright amendment legislation (C-60) has revealed
some complexities and emerging disagreement among
stakeholders. The Canadian Motion Picture Distributors
Association (CMPDA) also raised a new issue: camcording of
new-release movies in theaters, which seems to be a
significant problem in Canada. End Summary.
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COPYRIGHT ACT
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶2. (SBU) In our meetings with IP rightsholders in Ottawa and
Toronto, we found that most stakeholder concerns with C-60,
the draft legislation to amend Canada's Copyright Act, were
familiar (see Ottawa 1168). However, time has fine-tuned
industry concerns and highlighted subtle differences in
stakeholder positions.
¶3. (SBU) Internet Service Provider (ISP) Liability: For
example, while the current USG action plan and U.S.
stakeholders emphasize the need for a notice-and-takedown
regime, Canadian industry opinions are mixed on the need to
push for notice-and-takedown. The Canadian Motion Picture
Distributors Association (CMPDA) is satisfied with the
current notice-and-notice proposal in the draft legislation,
hoping that the record-keeping requirements for ISPs will
help their industry keep track of actions against online
infringers. In CMPDA's view, the advent of peer-to-peer
filesharing has lessened the need for notice-and-takedown,
since fewer users are downloading their files from large
websites of infringing material. On the other hand, the
Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA), Canadian
Alliance Against Software Theft (CAAST) and U.S.-based
Business Software Alliance (BSA) representatives strongly
believe that their industries still need a
notice-and-takedown regime. This divergence seems to depend
on how an industry's products are pirated and how
recalcitrant they anticipate the GOC will be on the issue.
Entertainment Software Association (ESA) representatives
opined that the GOC "isn't going to budge" on the issue of
notice-and-notice, possibly because of fears that a
notice-and-takedown regime could be unconstitutional in
Canada. C-60's general waiver of ISP liability was deemed
overly broad by all stakeholders; they felt that the waiver
of liability shouldn't be a blank check and that ISPs should
be held responsible for the content of their users' websites
once they become aware of the presence of copyright
infringing files.
¶4. (SBU) Trafficking in circumvention "tools" (devices and
software): Even in this area, which generally prompts a
chorus seeking a ban against trafficking in tools to
circumvent technological protection measures (TPM), industry
associations were not entirely in agreement. CMPDA, CRIA,
CAAST, and ESA are all firmly pushing for trafficking in TPM
circumvention tools to be made illegal. Currently the draft
legislation requires that the rightholder prove "intent to
infringe" for trafficking in tools to be illegal, and as one
industry representative points out, they already need to
prove intent and therefore this legislative change doesn't
give them any more ability to fight piracy. Industry
representatives would also like a law that allows them to go
after the larger-scale pirates selling circumvention tools,
rather than continuing to have to go after the "little guys"
who use them. However, the Information Technology Association
of Canada (ITAC) represents security firms who occasionally
circumvent TPMs, either to test their efficacy or to create
fixes for various holes in the security. ITAC says that
these niche activities need the protection of the "intent"
clause, although others argue that circumvention for reasons
other than infringement could be specifically exempted in the
legislation or could fall under 'fair use'. Prompted by its
cyber-security members, ITAC therefore opposes any move to
make trafficking in or creating TPM circumvention tools
illegal and supports the current requirement to prove intent
to infringe. (SBU comment: In an off-hand remark, an ITAC
VP mentioned that ITAC may feel the need to "push the other
side" to balance the anticipated lobbying from ESA, who will
push strongly for trafficking in circumvention tools to be
illegal regardless of intent. End comment.)
¶5. (SBU) Circumvention of TPMs intended to prevent access:
In what the CMPDA characterizes as a possible oversight in
the draft legislation, C-60 does not seem to make
circumvention of TPMs intended to prevent access (as opposed
to distribution) an offense. As with other issues of TPM
circumvention, the major industry associations hope to fix
this omission in the upcoming committee hearings on the draft
legislation.
¶6. (SBU) No criminal sanctions for infringement: CRIA, ESA
and CMPDA note that the WIPO treaties require "effective"
deterrents to copyright infringement. C-60 as drafted does
not provide any criminal provisions for circumvention, which
CRIA and CMPDA believe will mean that Canada does not have
adequate legal protection and effective remedies against
copyright infringement. An ESA representative pointed out
that the original Heritage Committee recommendations for
legislation included a recommendation for criminal provisions
for circumvention. (Comment: Per reftels, Heritage Canada's
stronger stance on IPR protection has been generally
undermined by Industry Canada's pressure for "balance." End
comment.)
¶7. (SBU) Can C-60 be saved?: One of the most contentious
insights that has arisen during recent consultations with IPR
stakeholders is the question of whether stakeholders even
want the bill to pass. Some industry representatives
predicted that the bill will "die on paper" and criticized
the potential for amending it in committee as likely to
result in "a mess". These representatives expressed the
expectation and hope that the legislation would be scrapped
and described as a best-case-scenario the legislation dying
after oral submissions (so that industries could make
comments.) On the other hand, when asked if they wanted the
bill to die, other industry representative seemed surprised
and explained that their members would rather see this draft
fixed, since if the bill dies, progress will be delayed for
another year.
CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
--------------------
¶8. (SBU) Numerous stakeholders noted that Justice Ministry,
Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) and Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) top priorities--terrorism, the border,
and counterfeits with safety issues like fake
pharmaceuticals--do not currently leave much attention or
funding for copyright protection. Anecdotal evidence of
progress, including RCMP training and minor counterfeit
seizures, was countered by general frustration over CBSA's
lack of power and all three agencies' inaction. Since RCMP
and Customs often do not respond to industry information on
infringement, Embassy has requested greater industry feedback
on industry's own enforcement actions. CMPDA gave an example
of a private seizure of 11,000 counterfeit DVDs from one
store in Toronto's Pacific Mall. (After giving the owner a
list of counterfeit DVDs that the owner agreed to hand over,
CMPDA officials were not surprised to return the next day to
find the store completely restocked...with counterfeit DVDs.)
ESA representatives also indicated that they intend to lobby
for more RCMP resources to combat copyright infringement;
they also hope to find a way for CBSA to have more power to
seize shipments (although ESA and CMPDA mentioned that the
border may become less important as Canadian-made
counterfeiting increases). Obviously enforcement is an
ongoing issue for IPR stakeholders, and we will provide
further information as we receive it. (Comment: one contact
told econoff of a recent discussion with a prominent IPR
lawyer who suggested that industry associations not even try
for criminal sanctions for TPM circumvention in C-60, since
it would not be enforced and therefore would be just one more
toothless law on the books. End comment.)
CAMCORDING IN THEATERS
-----------------------
¶9. CMPDA raised a new issue in meetings last week:
camcording new-release movies in theaters to create
counterfeit DVDs that often hit the streets within hours of
the official movie premiers. Because movies open in Canada
at the same time as in the United States, and because movies
in Canada are shown in both French and English, Canada has
become a primary source for camcorded counterfeits. In fact,
according to CMPDA, of all theaters which are used for
camcording new-release movies, 40 percent are in Canada, with
the majority of that 40 percent coming from just two theaters
in Montreal. CMPDA has worked with the theater owners in
question and is engaged in training their staff to combat
this activity, but without any law against camcording in
theaters, options are limited. RCMP and the local police
can't do anything without proof of commercial intent, and
generally the best CMPDA can hope for is that the offenders
will be ejected from the theater for that particular showing.
CMPDA is developing an estimate of the economic loss from
this sort of piracy, which they hope to use to prompt an
amendment to the criminal code outlawing camcording in
theaters. We have requested a copy of their loss estimates
when compiled, and we will continue to follow this issue
closely.
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
WILKINS