

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08OTTAWA333,
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08OTTAWA333.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08OTTAWA333 | 2008-03-04 22:02 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO5135
RR RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0333/01 0642202
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 042202Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7456
INFO RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS 0623
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 2194
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID 2169
RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON 0191
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 3343
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 0914
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO 2360
RUEHRK/AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK 0030
RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN 2331
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 1335
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON 0246
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 2238
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 1512
RUEHHA/AMCONSUL HALIFAX 2920
RUEHVC/AMCONSUL VANCOUVER 2620
RUEHQU/AMCONSUL QUEBEC 5331
RUCPDC/NOAA WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 OTTAWA 000333
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
STATE FOR OES AND WHA/CAN
COMMERCE FOR NMFS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIS EWWT PHSA SENV CA
SUBJ: INTERNATIONAL OCEANS POLICYMAKING IN CANADA:
AMBITIOUS VISION, PAROCHIAL POLITICS
REF: OTTAWA 0094 (notal)
¶1. (U) This message is sensitive, but unclassified. Not for
distribution outside USG channels.
¶2. (SBU) SUMMARY/INTRODUCTION: As they envision a global role,
Canada's policymakers in the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
(DFO) draw heavily upon Canadians' popular self-image as being
active multilateralists, international consensus brokers, and (at
least aspiring) leaders in resource stewardship. DFO brings some
important strengths to the international table, including
respectable scientific and operating capabilities, many
international linkages, and (more or less) a single federal
government ministry overseeing policy in this area (which
facilitates decisions, though it may reduce their quality).
¶3. (SBU) At the same time, DFO suffers from some severe weaknesses
as a policy-making department. DFO has yet to live down the blame
for the collapse of the once-immense Northwest Atlantic groundfish
(cod) resource in the early 1990s, nor the blame for its leading
role during the preceding decade in Canada's mismanagement of the
labor and industries that relied on fisheries. DFO's policy-making
and fish management machinery appears to have remained largely
unreformed since the cod collapse. Bureaucratically, DFO is
horizontally disintegrated, with weak links to other departments,
and large, semi-autonomous regional branches.
¶4. (SBU) Finally and most seriously, the political-electoral context
in which DFO Ministers operate makes them highly responsive to
parochial pressures in a few coastal regions (particularly
Newfoundland and Nova Scotia), and leaves them with few or no
incentives to consider the broad national interest, nor
international matters (except possibly as a source of external
enemies and scapegoats). There may yet be good results from
Canada's global oceans policy vision, but in our view, such results
would have to be realized in spite of, rather than due to, DFO's
Ministers, the DFO Department, and Canadians' own experience. END
SUMMARY/INTRODUCTION.
BACKGROUND
----------
¶5. (SBU) Since the collapse of the Northwest Atlantic groundfish
resource in the late 1980s and early 1990s, and the bitterly
reluctant cessation of cod fishing in 1993, Canada's Department of
Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) has been living down its role in that
collapse. Most outside experts view Canada's governments, led by
DFO with the complicity of other federal and provincial departments,
as having caused the destruction not only of the resource but also
of the East Coast maritime economy.
¶6. (SBU) The beginning of the end is generally held to have been
1977, when the extension of Canada's exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
to 200 nautical miles inaugurated a rush to exploit newly staked
offshore resources. As the story is usually told, DFO and other
government agencies facilitated the overexpansion of the fishery for
more than a decade through a complex of mistaken policies:
Qmore than a decade through a complex of mistaken policies:
subsidizing the acquisition of boats and gear, building fish
processing infrastructure in as many locations as possible,
enriching income support programs (notably unemployment insurance)
that caused young workers to choose the fishery over schooling or
alternate occupations, expanding fishing quotas while biasing or
ignoring scientific advice, and under-investing in enforcement.
¶7. (U) Groundfish catches fell steeply in the early 1990s until the
government introduced a moratorium on cod fishing in 1993, with the
hope that the stocks would begin to recover in a year or two. This
did not occur. While federal and provincial government programs
were adapted to suit the new circumstances, they continued to keep
people attached to the fishery and to maintain capacity. Some fish
OTTAWA 00000333 002 OF 004
catching and processing capacity was mothballed, but much effort was
redirected to shellfish and previously "under-utilized" species.
These have largely turned out to be high-value and have yielded good
incomes. So far these species seem to have avoided the fate of the
cod, though observers suggest this is due to their shorter life
cycles and higher reproductive rates, rather than to implementation
of "lessons learned" in fish management.
¶8. (U) DFO tried for some years to attribute the cod collapse to
environmental or other factors (temperature change, seals), and one
Minister (Brian Tobin) attained folk-hero status by dramatically
highlighting the culpability of foreign long-distance fleets.
However, most independent observers (and many within the GOC) saw
GOC policies, and particularly DFO fish management practices over
the long run, as having been primarily responsible, with strong
encouragement from successive provincial governments, particularly
in Newfoundland-Labrador.
BOLD VISION
-----------
¶9. (U) In 1997 Canada passed a law called the "Oceans Act" which it
presented as a model for the future. DFO created a new Oceans
Directorate, and the Act mandated DFO to develop an "overall
strategic approach to oceans management" based on sustainable
development, integrated management, and the precautionary approach.
This led DFO into a decade of policy and "strategy" development
exercises. In 2005, funds were allocated to implement the first
phase of an Oceans Action Plan, and significant progress has been
made toward creating Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).
¶10. (U) Cynics could say that DFO eventually came to terms with the
cod collapse by describing it as part of a "global problem with many
underlying causes." DFO's approach to overfishing is now expressed
in its "International Fisheries and Oceans Governance Strategy," or
IFOGS. According to IFOGS, a "holistic approach" is needed to
combat global overfishing, including monitoring and surveillance,
diplomacy, better governance of regional fisheries management
organizations, and greater scientific understanding (particularly of
straddling and highly migratory stocks).
¶11. (SBU) While these "strategic policy" exercises no doubt reflect
a sincere effort by DFO to learn from the past and broaden its view,
there is no perception among Canadians that the system that
mismanaged the cod through the 1980s has been reformed, or that DFO
has admitted the magnitude of its responsibility. DFO remains more
or less solely responsible for managing Canada's marine fisheries,
under the same political calculus and using more or less the same
systems that have prevailed for decades. An update to the
140-year-old fisheries law is currently before Parliament, and this
partly reflects an effort to de-politicize fish management.
Nevertheless, DFO officials downplay the legislation - billing it as
"just trying to catch up and codify what present practice is"
Q"just trying to catch up and codify what present practice is"
(reftel) - reinforcing the impression that little has really
changed.
IMPORTANT STRENGTHS - AND WEAKNESSES
------------------------------------
¶12. (U) As a policy-making organization, DFO has some important
real or at least potential strengths, yet on examination, these tend
not to be utilized. Examples include the following:
¶13. (U) SCIENCE - DFO has a large, diverse scientific establishment
which is relatively autonomous and is located in institutes and
field offices far from Ottawa. The problems of managing this
establishment are not unique to DFO, rather they are common to most
research organizations (succession planning, knowledge management,
long-term budgeting). More problematic is whether and how DFO
OTTAWA 00000333 003 OF 004
policymakers have based their decisions on the knowledge generated
by this establishment. It is now widely believed that, at least in
the years around the collapse of the cod stocks, much scientific
advice about fish management was distorted and/or ignored, and
scientists were pressured not to complain publicly about this.
While these practices may have been reformed, there is no such
perception among other stakeholders. As a result, while DFO has
strong scientific assets, its credibility does not benefit
accordingly.
¶14. (U) INTERNATIONAL LINKAGES - DFO offices, and particularly its
operational and scientific staff, have strong and diverse
international connections. A study at the end of 2006 found the
department's employees had some 400 recent or ongoing international
activities, which could be classed into navigation/safety/security
(30%), science and hydrography (28%), policy, trade and development
(22%) and fisheries and conservation (20%). (More than half of
these 400 international activities involved the United States, and
this measurement did not capture a significant amount of additional
informal contact). As with operational and scientific knowledge,
these international linkages appear to offer rich source data for
DFO to develop international policy, but this data was scattered,
hard to collect, and not being utilized.
¶15. (U) SINGLE POLICY SHOP - DFO international policy staff proudly
note that they run Canada's "single policy shop" on international
fisheries and oceans issues, in that the Department shares very
little of its jurisdiction with provincial governments or other
federal departments. (The Department of Foreign Affairs and
International Trade (DFAIT) substantially cedes international
fisheries and oceans policy to DFO). Unfortunately, there is a flip
side to this coin: policy may lack the robustness that can be
conferred by inter-agency process. DFO's links to other departments
and agencies appear to be surprisingly weak (in the case of Foreign
Affairs or Environment Canada) or non-existent (in the case of the
Canadian International Development Agency). Even the Canadian Coast
Guard and the Canadian Hydrographic Service - two significant
agencies which formally report to the Minister of Fisheries and
Oceans - are protective of their separate identities, and seem to
play down their links to the department.
¶16. (U) OPERATIONAL CAPACITY - For a Canadian government
organization, a remarkably high proportion of DFO's personnel are
"boots on the ground" (or on the wharf, on deck, or in the chart
room) who work out of regional and local offices and serve in
operational roles such as the Coast Guard, the Hydrographic Service,
small harbor management and construction, navigational systems,
fisheries management and enforcement, and fish habitat protection -
not to mention science (below).
¶17. (SBU) Though the policymaking function must compete against all
Q17. (SBU) Though the policymaking function must compete against all
these operational concerns for the attention of the Minister and
Deputy Minister, policymaking can also draw upon a very large number
of contacts with reality, and the Department has a direct and
visible role in stakeholder communities which should give it a
useful "voter constituency." Unfortunately, these potential
strengths are not fully realized; too many of those in policy
development roles have virtually never been on a ship and are
unlikely to stay long in the Department, while DFO's presence in
communities can merely cause its decisions to be skewed by local
electoral concerns.
THE FATAL FLAW: REGIONAL POLITICS
----------------------------------
¶18. (SBU) Which brings us to what, in Embassy Ottawa's view, is the
most serious challenge to Canadian fisheries and oceans
policymaking: regional electoral politics. All of the weaknesses
OTTAWA 00000333 004 OF 004
mentioned so far could arguably be overcome or mitigated by reform.
It is much harder to see what can be done about the decisive
concentration of fishery-related votes in certain provinces of
Canada.
¶19. (SBU) In Newfoundland-Labrador, Prince Edward Island (PEI), the
territory of Nunavut, and parts of Nova Scotia (NS), New Brunswick
(NB), Quebec and British Columbia (BC), marine-based economic
activity is a principal economic driver, so that fishery votes
really matter to electoral outcomes. (This contrasts sharply with,
for example, the States of Washington, Massachusetts, Florida and
California, where fishery-related issues are tiny compared with
other industries and concerns in those diverse, wealthy regional
economies). Indeed, in Newfoundland and Labrador, issues like the
governance/reform of a regional fishery management organization like
the North Atlantic Fishery Organization (NAFO), or the denial of
port privileges to foreign long-distance fishing fleets - questions
which might seem obscure in other jurisdictions - draw intense voter
attention.
¶20. (SBU) In Canadian general elections, where it takes as little as
100-120 seats to win federal power, ten or more seats in Atlantic
Canada can easily tilt on fishing issues: three to seven in
Newfoundland-Labrador, and two or three in each of NS, NB, PEI and
Quebec. Normally, the top political concern of Canada's Minister of
Fisheries and Oceans, a mid-level cabinet minister who more often
than not holds one of these seats, is to deliver as many of them as
possible to candidates for his/her political party. (The current
Minister, Loyola Hearn, represents a riding in
Newfoundland-Labrador.) International policymaking is guaranteed to
be subordinate in the Minister's calculations, if it figures at all.
This narrow focus is likely to tighten even further in the next
federal election as the Minister will have to overcome regional
hostility over an ongoing dispute between Ottawa and the Atlantic
provinces concerning Ottawa's treatment of natural resource
revenue.
CONCLUSION/COMMENT
------------------
¶21. (SBU) Our conclusion is that too much of the crafting of
Canada's international fisheries and oceans policy positions, and
too much of the diplomatic work, falls to a few senior DFO officials
without the benefit of an interagency process or ministerial
engagement. But solution of these institutional-bureaucratic
problems is at least a possibility (though the companies and fishers
that currently influence DFO would likely resist). Even so, that
would leave policymakers with the constraints of regional electoral
politics. While offshore oil development has wrought some change in
eastern Newfoundland, and economic growth and resource developments
have amazing power to transform "have-nots" into "haves," there
seems little current prospect that such fishing-reliant
constituencies will develop enough dramatic new economic drivers to
Qconstituencies will develop enough dramatic new economic drivers to
dilute the power of the "fish vote."
WILKINS