

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09STATE35745, A/S SHANNON'S MEETINGS WITH ECUADORIAN OFFICIALS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09STATE35745.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09STATE35745 | 2009-04-10 19:05 | 2011-04-07 07:30 | SECRET | Secretary of State |
Appears in these articles: http://www.eluniverso.com/2011/04/07/1/1355/cable-201915.html |
O R 101905Z APR 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO AMEMBASSY QUITO IMMEDIATE
INFO AMEMBASSY ASUNCION
AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES
AMEMBASSY CARACAS
AMEMBASSY LA PAZ
AMEMBASSY LIMA
AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO
AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO
AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL
NSC WASHINGTON DC 0000
S E C R E T STATE 035745
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/10/2019
TAGS: PREL PINR SNAR EC
SUBJECT: A/S SHANNON'S MEETINGS WITH ECUADORIAN OFFICIALS
TO DISCUSS ECUADORIAN ACCUSATIONS OF U.S. INTERFERENCE
REF: A. QUITO 217
¶B. QUITO 160
C...
id: 201915
date: 4/10/2009 19:05
refid: 09STATE35745
origin: Secretary of State
classification: SECRET
destination: 09QUITO145|09QUITO153|09QUITO160|09QUITO217
header:
O R 101905Z APR 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO AMEMBASSY QUITO IMMEDIATE
INFO AMEMBASSY ASUNCION
AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES
AMEMBASSY CARACAS
AMEMBASSY LA PAZ
AMEMBASSY LIMA
AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO
AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO
AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL
NSC WASHINGTON DC 0000
----------------- header ends ----------------
S E C R E T STATE 035745
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/10/2019
TAGS: PREL PINR SNAR EC
SUBJECT: A/S SHANNON'S MEETINGS WITH ECUADORIAN OFFICIALS
TO DISCUSS ECUADORIAN ACCUSATIONS OF U.S. INTERFERENCE
REF: A. QUITO 217
¶B. QUITO 160
¶C. QUITO 153
¶D. QUITO 145
Classified By: A/S SHANNON, REASONS 1.4 (B) and (D).
¶1. Summary. (S/NF) On April 1, A/S Shannon met Ecuadorian
Justice Minister Jalkh, Vice Foreign Minister Pozo, and other
GOE officials to discuss GOE accusations that an embassy
official had taken actions to destabilize the government of
Ecuador. Making clear the GOE's desire to work with the USG
on security matters, Jalkh alleged inappropriate contacts
between the Embassy officers and Ecuadorian "bad actors"
known to have a criminal history. A/S Shannon responded that
we would investigate the allegations, reaffirmed the U.S.
desire to work constructively with Ecuador, and stressed the
importance of working with Ambassador Hodges on this matter
going forward. At the conclusion of the meeting, Pozo handed
A/S Shannon a printed presentation that summarized the GOE's
allegations.
¶2. (S/NF) Summary (Continued). On April 3, A/S Shannon and
DAS McMullen had a follow up meeting with Minister Jalkh and
Ambassador Gallegos. A/S Shannon informed Minister Jalkh
that Embassy Quito had conducted a preliminary investigation
of the allegations made by the GOE. He said that the USG had
not found inappropriate behavior on the part of the embassy
offer. He added that the USG was concerned that a third
party might have been involved in this approach to the
embassy, and he requested a cooperative investigation between
the embassy and the GOE to get to the bottom of the matter.
He noted that the United States has no desire to destabilize
Ecuador and seeks cooperation. However, he cautioned that
any further expulsions of embassy staff would be very
problematic. Both Jalkh and A/S Shannon closed by stressing
the need to get beyond current difficulties and reestablish
broad cooperation. End Summary.
April 1 Meeting
---------------
¶3. (S/NF) A/S Shannon met with Ecuador's Minister of Justice,
Gustavo Jalkh; MFA Vice Minister, Lautaro Pozo; Permanent
Representative to the UN, Maria Espinosa; Permanent
Representative to the OAS, Efren Cocios; Chief of Staff of
for VM Pozo, Efrain Baus; and Ambassador to the United
States, Luis Gallegos, on April 1 to discuss GOE allegations
of an effort by an Embassy Quito officer to destabilize the
government of Ecuador. WHA/DAS, WHA/AND Officer Director,
INL/LP Office Director, and the Ecuador Desk Officer also
participated. Jalkh opened by noting that he had only been
in his current position for six weeks. He reviewed the tough
work involved in reforming Ecuador's national police, and
noted that security on the northern border of Ecuador is a
key priority. He stressed that social development in Ecuador
is crucial to the task of protecting both human rights and
security.
¶4. (S/NF) Jalkh next stated that the GOE had found some
issues that needed to be addressed to strengthen the
bilateral relationship with the United States: "Cooperation
is our goal; we wish to work together on all fronts through
time, government to government." Referring to the recent
expulsions of two U.S. officials (reftels), Jalkh asserted
that the GOE could not have responded any other way. He
added that the GOE hoped that such difficulties would not
happen again and that the GOE needs improved communication
with the United States.
¶5. (S/NF) Jalkh moved on to the specific point of the
meeting. According to Jalkh, the GOE had evidence of an
inappropriate meeting at Embassy Quito between an Embassy
officer and "bad actors" in Ecuador. Jalkh further asserted
that the emboff offered benefits to these individuals in
exchange for speaking ill of the GOE regarding narcotics
matters. Jalkh underlined that his goal was to address this
matter so broader cooperation could take place. He said, "We
need to talk of this. We want to work with you on this. We
believe in human rights and democratic controls. This is a
new type of government." He added that the GOE had massive
problems on its northern border and would like to cooperate
with the United States on the refugee problem. He also said
that Ecuador does not get the recognition it deserves for its
efforts on its northern border. Summing up, Jalkh said, "We
want to turn the page to our mutual concerns, but we have to
get over this issue (of alleged Embassy meddling)."
¶6. (S/NF) VM Pozo next spoke. According to Pozo, "We know
this is not the policy of the United States. This is a clear
conspiracy to destabilize the government of Ecuador. There
were phone calls to set up the meeting. This involves a well
known criminal. It is very upsetting." Pozo said the GOE
did not meet with the embassy regarding this matter,
ostensibly in an effort to reduce tensions. Commenting on
the GOE's recent expulsions of Embassy officials from
Ecuador, Pozo said: "We know this (the allegedly nefarious
actions of the expelled emboffs) is not the policy of the
Department of State. These were personal actions by these
individuals." He said the GOE wants this matter
investigated. Pozo said that President Correa told Pozo and
Jalkh to travel to the United States to raise these issues
and claimed that the GOE had a real desire to cooperate with
the United States.
¶7. (S/NF) A/S Shannon responded by thanking the GOE officials
for the information they had provided. He said the USG would
investigate the situation, and told the officials that the
United States had no interest in interfering in domestic
matters, and was particularly sensitive to such concerns
during an election campaign. Shannon noted the efforts of
the Correa administration to reconfigure the government and
create the possibility of stability. He added that a stable
Ecuador with political and economic development is
important--especially in an integrating and globalizing
world: "We share an interest in improving dialogue,
identifying common interests, and working together." He
noted that problems in bilateral relations between Ecuador
and the United States would cause damage in the region.
Pointing out that both countries are in a political
transition, A/S Shannon said that the Obama administration is
seeking to "reimagine relations in the hemisphere."
¶8. (S/NF) Jalkh agreed, emphasizing the need to work on
common interests. He said the GOE was serious about
democratic controls; about the fight against illicit
narcotics; and about creating a new ethos and legal framework
for the police. Jalkh highlighted GOE plans to increase its
police presence on the northern border. He said the GOE
would measure its effectiveness along the northern border,
"not by resources added, but if we take down gangs." Pozo
echoed Jalkh's comments. He said that Ecuador had a
significant state presence on the northern border, with
11,000 troops (or one quarter of all Ecuadorian troops). He
added that the GOE is worried about demobilized Colombians
creating additional problems and said, "We are victims."
Ambassador Espinosa briefly mentioned that Ecuador had an
exemplary record with respect to refugees.
¶9. (S/NF) A/S Shannon replied that the United States
understands the problems Ecuador faces along its northern
border, including the situation regarding refugees and the
need for investment. He pointed out that there are more
Colombian refugees in the region than there are refugees in
Darfur and that the lack of awareness in the hemisphere
regarding the problem was the fault of the inter-American
system, which has failed to capture and articulate the needs
of refugees in the region.
¶10. (S/NF) Moving back to the bilateral relationship, A/S
Shannon asserted the need to reconfigure our diplomatic
relations, and emphasized the confidence and respect the
State Department and the White House had for Ambassador
Hodges. He also emphasized that occasional points of
disagreement between the United States and Ecuador did not
represent the totality of relations between the two
countries. Ambassador Gallegos responded to this final point
by stating that "we need to denarcoticize relations" and
focus on other items, such as economic, social, security, and
development matters. He commented that the bilateral
dialogue presented a chance to expand relations and that new
items should be added to the dialogue's agenda. Gallegos
noted that relations between the United States and Ecuador
needed to be transparent and respectful.
¶11. (S/NF) At different moments during the discussion, both
Jalkh and Pozo raised the matter of vetted units in Ecuador
(reftels). Jalkh stressed that the GOE had three main
requirements for future cooperation: first, any agreements
must be in writing; second, all agreements must be
coordinated through the GOE's MFA; and third, the vetting
process must be collaborative. He said that the GOE
recognized that cooperating on intelligence matters was
different, and that the GOE would try to accommodate the USG
on this. He also mentioned, "It is not good to have only one
good unit" to combat narcotics trafficking in Ecuador. Pozo
stressed that vetted units must be under the control of the
civilian authority.
¶12. (S/NF) As the meeting ended, Minister Pozo handed A/S
Shannon two documents providing details of illegal armed
groups along Ecuador's northern border and the GOE's military
position along the northern border. He also provided a
printed PowerPoint presentation that outlined the GOE's
specific assertions regarding the March 24 meeting of the
Ecuadorian "bad actors" and embassy officers.
April 3 Follow Up Meeting
--------------------------
¶13. (S/NF) A/S Shannon and WHA DAS McMullen met with Minister
Jalkh and Ambassador Gallegos on April 3 for a follow up
discussion. A/S Shannon told Jalkh that Embassy Quito had
completed a preliminary inquiry into the March 24 meeting,
when the allegedly "inappropriate meeting" took place. He
said that what the Embassy had discovered caused us concern,
though our concerns were different from those expressed by
the GOE at the April 1 meeting. A/S Shannon said that the
USG was concerned that a third party might have been involved
in this approach to the Embassy. He said the USG considered
it important for the GOE to work cooperatively with our
embassy to investigate what happened; he asked the GOE to
share any additional information -- such as tapes of
telephone conversations between Munoz and Rodas following the
meeting at the embassy. He emphasized to Jalkh that the
embassy official had done nothing inappropriate by simply
meeting with Ecuadorians who had claimed to have information
on the FARC.
¶14. (S/NF) A/S Shannon reiterated that the USG had no reason
to try to destabilize the Correa government. He said that,
given Ecuador's recent turbulent history, the USG was hoping
that Correa would bring stability, democracy and development
to Ecuador. He added that the United States would like to
get past this incident as soon as possible and reestablish
close cooperation in areas of mutual interest.
¶15. (S/NF) Minister Jalkh responded that the GOE appreciated
the quick response and committed the GOE to working with
Embassy Quito to follow up. He pledged to set up a meeting
with Ambassador Hodges on April 6 to discuss next steps.
Jalkh added that the GOE also wanted to turn the page and
move on -- and collaborate closely on a broad set of issues,
not just security. He said the GOE appreciated the U.S.
decision not to retaliate for Ecuador's expulsion of two
Embassy officers. While the GOE believed that those Embassy
officers had acted inappropriately, he acknowledged that the
USG had the sovereign right to retaliate, but had chosen not
to do so. In an implied reference to the Summit of the
Americas, Jalkh mentioned that it would be helpful if both
countries' leaders could meet and get to know one another.
¶16. (S/NF) A/S Shannon again stated that the United States
wanted to find points of convergence with Ecuador and was not
seeking confrontation. He warned, however, that any further
expulsions by the GOE would be very problematic. He closed
by stressing the importance of both countries moving beyond
this rough patch in relations; he hoped that the April 6
meeting with Ambassador Hodges and her team would be a first
step in that direction.
CLINTON
=======================CABLE ENDS============================