

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE497, U.S.-CHILEAN JOINT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSISTANCE LAUNCHES IN
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE497.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE497 | 2009-06-17 12:35 | 2011-03-21 16:30 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0497/01 1681235
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 171235Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0930
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 0461
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000497
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC:MROONEY AND AWONG, EEB/IFD/ODF
TREASURY FOR LMCDONALD, DVKOCH, AND SSENICH
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EFIN EINV PGOV PREL CS CI
SUBJECT: U.S.-CHILEAN JOINT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSISTANCE LAUNCHES IN
COSTA RICA
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. From May 18-21, a Treasury Department team from the Office of
Technical Assistance (OTA) met with Costa Rican government leaders
and private sector officials to consider how to meet Costa Rica's
national infrastructure challenges. The meetings represented the
first step of Treasury's and the Government of Chile's (GOC) joint
Infrastructure Finance Experts Corps (IFEC) project, which aims to
bring expert advice on financing, tendering, managing, and operating
infrastructure projects with an emphasis on public-private
partnerships (PPP). The two parties chose Costa Rica as a pilot
country for the project in late 2008. Three weeks after the OTA
team visit, a Chilean delegation -- plus two OTA Advisors --
conducted a two-day trip featuring meetings and a successful
half-day seminar on infrastructure PPPs.
¶2. After the week of OTA meetings, three areas for framing a
working relationship between the OTA, the GOC, and the GOCR emerged:
(1) identification of specific projects for OTA and GOC assistance
and delineation of specific roles for the OTA and the GOC; (2)
strengthening the work of the GOCR's Council of Concessions, a
multi-ministerial body charged with decision-making on
infrastructure projects; and (3) promoting the success of
concessions in Costa Rica, a country struggling to make strides in
implementing successful concession-driven infrastructure projects.
This "first draft" of work areas for the IFEC project in Costa Rica
will likely be revised as the initiative evolves. As a backdrop for
next steps, the Chilean seminar underscored key elements for
successful PPPs including legislative and contract flexibility,
dispute resolution, and liberating public resources. The OTA
anticipates a second visit with the Chileans in July to advance the
IFEC project. This unusual tri-national effort may prove to be an
important catalyst for developing Costa Rica's creaky
infrastructure. END SUMMARY.
--------------------------------------------- --
ACT ONE, SCENE ONE (THE OTA VISIT): THE PLAYERS
--------------------------------------------- --
¶3. OTA Advisors Harry Tether and Barry Gray traveled to Costa Rica
for four days of meetings commencing on May 18. Treasury Deputy
Assistant Secretary Larry McDonald joined for part of the visit.
The OTA team met with a wide variety of players in Costa Rican
infrastructure, including:
-- Guillermo Zuniga Chaves, Minister of Finance (Hacienda), Jose
Adrian Vargas, Treasurer, Juan Carlos Pacheco, Director, and Melvin
Quiros, Deputy Director, Public Credit, Hacienda;
-- Javier Cascante, Director, Superindentency of Pensions (SUPEN);
-- Ronald Vargas, Banco Nacional;
-- Jose Luis Valenciano (PLN), National Assembly member and Chairman
of the Finance Committee;
-- Rocio Aguilar, Contraloria (Comptroller) of the GOCR;
-- Guillermo Matamoros, Vice Minister of Concessions, and Pedro Luis
Castro, Vice Minister, MOPT Ministry of Public Works and
Transportation (MOPT);
-- Luis Gamboa (Vedova & Obando), President, and Lynda Solar,
Executive Director, Costa Rican-American Chamber of Commerce
(AmCham);
-- Charles Spalding (Trelex), Alonso Arroyo (KPMG), Jose Antonio
Munoz (Arias and Munoz), and William Merrigan (P&G), Board Members,
AmCham;
-- Jeff Scheferman, President/CEO, and Greg Huang, Vice President of
Finance, ADC/HAS (a U.S.-Canadian-Brazilian consortium vying to
purchase the operating and development rights to the San Jose
airport);
-- Eduardo Sibaja, Minister of Economy, Industry, and Commerce
(MEIC);
-- Ambassador Gonzalo Mendoza Negri and Esteban Cordova Tapia,
International Cooperation Counselor, Embassy of Chile;
-- Mariela Diaz, Director, and Cecilia Montero, Manager, ProChile;
-- Carlos Jaraquemada Valle, Administrative and Finance Director,
Antonio Alonso Jimenez, Project Director, Autopistas del Sol (a
Spanish-led consortium constructing and operating a highway
concession in San Jose);
-- Pedro Pablo Quiros, Chief Executive Officer, Instituto de
Costariccense Electricidad (ICE), the national electric and
telecommunications authority,
-- Rodolfo Lizano Rojas, Legal Director, AyA (the national water
authority); and
-- Fernando Quevado, Country Representative, InterAmerican
Development Bank.
-------------------------------------------
ACT ONE, SCENE ONE HIGHLIGHTS I: THUMBS UP
-------------------------------------------
¶4. MEIC Minister Sibaja concisely summarized the GOCR's challenge
with infrastructure: "We need to do concessions as we do not have
the resources in the government to fund infrastructure
improvements." The Minister noted the need to highlight concession
success given Costa Rica's history of failing to implement
concession projects without legal wrangling and/or a breakdown in
project execution. Though Costa has two successful concessions --
Puerto Caldera (the country's secondary port located on the
Pacific), and the newly-expanded San Jose-Caldera highway (a work in
progress) -- the general populace believes that concessions are a
troubled, if not doomed, process, based on experiences with the San
Jose airport, the Limon-Moin port, and a planned prison
privatization. Also, there is lingering suspicion, fueled by
opponents and especially the public sector unions, that concessions
represent a "give-away" of valuable public assets to the private
sector.
¶5. MOPT Vice Minister Matamoros welcomed the proposed IFEC process
by stating, "We (GOCR) need you to start yesterday." Matamoros also
made several observations about the concession process in Costa Rica
touching on the lack of expert capacity and problems with acquiring
materials; the grating differences between the operating speed of
the Costa Rican system (slow) and concessionaires (fast); the
potential of using bond funds for financing projects; and the need
for a better expropriation law for purchasing land. The meetings
with Autopistas del Sol (the Caldera highway concessionaire) and
ADC/HAS (poised to take over the languishing San Jose airport
project on July 1) confirmed many of the Vice Minister's
observations.
¶6. Minister Zuniga emphasized, as did DAS Treasury McDonald, Costa
Rica's need to follow the route of concessions, address the sluggish
pace of project implementation, find solutions to inter-governmental
coordination (including with the legislature and the Comptroller),
and improve ministerial capacity to evaluate projects. The Minister
expounded on the special challenges of the Council of Concessions, a
GOCR "inter-ministerial" board comprised of the Ministers of MOPT,
Hacienda and Planning; the President of the Central Bank; and the
Technical Society (private sector representatives). Participation
at Council meetings is erratic and there is scant lead time for
ministers to assess projects in advance.
---------------------------------------------
ACT ONE, SCENE ONE HIGHLIGHTS II: CHALLENGES
---------------------------------------------
¶7. Comptroller Aguilar occupies a controversial post in Costa Rica
as her office has grown into an increasingly (and perhaps overly)
powerful body in recent years. Appointed by the National Assembly,
the Comptroller
can both forecast a project's viability and later audit the same
project, but without responsibility of having to answer to the
(in)accuracy of the original forecast. That responsibility lies
with the "sponsoring" ministry, which in turn seeks to avoid
problems by deferring to the Comptroller's Office from the outset.
As other public officials told OTA and the Chileans, the Comptroller
thus accumulates decision-making authority for ministries by
default, since mid-level staffs willingly defer decisions to the
Comptroller to avoid responsibility for their own decisions (and
possible legal action against them).
¶8. Thus, the Comptroller operates as a shadow of the executive and
legislative branches, using its resident expertise in law,
engineering, auditing, finance, and public administration to
"legally" second guess either or both on decisions. Yet, the
Comptroller does not desire its now-elevated profile. Aguilar noted
that the Comptroller might be subject to "less criticism" if its
function were more operational and less focused on the evaluation of
program results.
¶9. Chilean Ambassador Mendoza voiced his exasperation with
governmental progress in Costa Rica, using both the CAFTA saga and
concessions as "poster child" examples. The Ambassador urged the
participants in IFEC to promote and publicize positive
infrastructure news. A similar challenge existed in Chile, he
explained, but the GOC steadfastly changed prevailing public opinion
through skillful public relations and successful project execution.
---------------------------------------------
ACT ONE, SCENE ONE HIGHLIGHTS III: FINANCING
---------------------------------------------
¶10. Ronald Vargas, Banco Nacional's (BNCR) investment bank
director, described the "fidiecomiso," or trust structure, for
creating public-private partnerships. For each project, BNCR
establishes a trust, which issues bonds on the local market,
purchases land, hires contractors, and constructs the capital asset.
The trust then leases the asset to a government agency. Once the
trust pays the bondholders, BNCR will dissolve the trust and
transfer the asset to an agency. As examples, Vargas cited two
successful power plant projects: Penas Blancas (USD 70 million),
near the Nicaraguan border, and Cariblanco (USD 170 million), in the
mountains northeast of San Jose. Both were built for the state-owned
Electrical Institute (ICE). The limited local capital market and
the Comptroller's initial skepticism towards the trust framework
represented two major challenges, however. Vargas believes that
project success established the credibility of the concept and
demonstrated how future projects can clear approval hurdles. (To
date, BNCR has financed four projects with the "fidiecomiso" scheme
valued at USD 295 million and has new project approvals valued at
USD 470 million).
¶11. SUPEN Director Cascante indicated that the Costa Rican capital
market can absorb future bond offerings. He supports the Pension
Funds' use of bonds issued by infrastructure trusts, underscoring
the Funds' growing financing potential manifested by annual
increases of USD 200-250 million. Pension funds can invest heavily
in trusts pioneered by BNCR's Ronald Vargas because those projects
are classified as "private" -- even though they finance
infrastructure that will become public once the trust pays off the
bonds. Costa Rican law limits the pension funds to invest 60
percent of their funds in GOCR bonds. There is no similar limit for
private bonds.
--------------------------------------------- ------
ACT ONE, SCENE TWO (THE CHILEAN VISIT): THE PLAYERS
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶12. Representatives from the GOC visited Costa Rica June 8-9 for
meetings and a half-day seminar. Treasury OTA Advisors Steven
Hochman and Jeanine Corvetto participated in both the meetings and
the seminar. Hosted by the Chilean Embassy and ProChile (a GOC
trade promotion agency), the Chilean Delegation included the
following:
-- Juan Eduardo Saldivia, Subsecretario, Ministerio de Obras
Publicas (MOP);
-- Leonel Vivallos, Coordinador de Concessiones, MOP;
-- Ivan Martens, Agencia de Cooperacion Internacional de Chile; and
-- Javier Hurtado, Director, Camara de la Construccion Chile.
As with the TREAS OTA team in May, the Chilean delegation and OTA
Advisors met VM Matamoros and Comptroller Aguilar. Additional
officials included Hacienda Vice Minister Jenny Phillips, Director
Randall Murillo and some ten members of the Chamber of Construction,
a Board member of the Council of Concessions, and a mayor of a city
adjacent to San Jose.
--------------------------------------------- ----
ACT ONE, SCENE TWO HIGHLIGHTS I: SEMINAR SUCCESS
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶13. At the June 9 seminar, the Chilean delegation highlighted for
the 70-member audience Chile's impressive PPP accomplishments across
a diverse range of projects, including highways, airports, stadiums,
prisons, public buildings, and intermodal transfer stations. Key
recommendations included legislative and contract flexibility,
guaranteed financing, practical regulations, creditor protection,
agreement on risk assignment, and a dispute resolution process.
Repeatedly, the delegation stressed the concession advantage as
increasing competiveness and productivity, liberating public
resources (for social investment), and spurring private sector
innovation. Under the rubric of IFEC, the Chileans want to make a
difference and project their success elsewhere in the Americas.
¶14. The OTA Advisors presented both the advantages and
disadvantages of PPPs when compared to traditional approaches while
noting how PPPs are an important additional tool for developing
infrastructure. They also noted the importance of achieving an
appropriate allocation of risk between the public and private
partners when creating a PPP.
---------------------------------------------
ACT ONE, SCENE TWO HIGHLIGHTS II: CHALLENGES
---------------------------------------------
¶15. In meetings with the Comptroller and the GOC, the two OTA
Advisors concluded that the Comptroller's Office takes a more
skeptical view of the concessions/PPP approach than does the Finance
Ministry, a possible source of friction as the IFEC initiative
develops. Also, in the mayoral meeting, we learned that the
municipal sector sorely lacks the resources for infrastructure
development and thus welcomes the PPP approach as an opportunity to
bolster public services.
-----------------------------------
ACT ONE, BOTH SCENES: THE PRODUCERS
-----------------------------------
¶16. Treasury OTA found supporting funds for the OTA's participation
in IFEC within Treasury. The Chileans dedicated funds to support
their part of the program, independent of U.S. funds. In
anticipation of the project moving forward, the Chileans started
working with VM Matamoros well in advance of the OTA visit to Costa
Rica.
--------
COMMENTS
--------
¶17. The OTA team and the Embassy identified three near- term issues
for future meetings and work: (1) collaborating with the GOCR to
select specific IFEC project(s) and define specific areas of focus
for the IEFC team; (2) increasing the effectiveness of the Council
of Concessions; and (3) publicizing concession and public-private
partnership successes. The Chilean emphasis on how to structure
successful PPPs, while acknowledging problems, can provide vital,
practical, and experience-based assistance to the GOCR and its
turgid legal and governing system. The generally positive GOCR view
of Chile as a model to emulate in many areas may also help.
¶18. On the other hand, the messy business of inter-ministerial and
inter-agency coordination in Costa Rica -- with the Comptroller's
Office in a pivotal and disproportionately powerful position --
remains an exogenous drag on any public works project, with or
without PPPs. Throw in the Comptroller's protracted and excessively
deliberative due diligence, which is compounded by Costa Rica's
hyper-legalism and penchant for "perfect consensus," and systemic
solutions become daunting and elusive. Nevertheless, we view IFEC
as one promising solution to Costa Rica's infrastructure woes.
CIANCHETTE