

Currently released so far... 12648 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AEMR
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AMCHAMS
AGMT
AADP
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BX
BT
BP
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CR
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CODEL
COPUOS
CIA
CFED
CARSON
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CN
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
EPET
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
ENIV
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ENNP
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXIM
ERNG
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IO
IT
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
IDP
ICTR
IEFIN
IRC
ITRA
ITALY
INRB
INTELSAT
IBET
IRAQI
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KIRF
KSEO
KVPR
KSEP
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KRIM
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KMFO
KMOC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KREC
KX
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTRE
MASC
MG
MARAD
MRCRE
MW
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NATIONAL
NGO
NR
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OECD
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PCI
PG
POGOV
PHUMPGOV
PEL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PMIL
POV
PRL
PDOV
PTBS
PRAM
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
ROOD
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SG
SPCE
SK
STEINBERG
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SEN
SANC
SWE
SHI
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
THPY
TP
TBID
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UY
UNCHR
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNMIK
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
USUN
USNC
UNIDROIT
UNO
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06HELSINKI696, EU-US INFORMAL SENIOR-LEVEL MEETING ON JUSTICE AND HOME
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06HELSINKI696.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06HELSINKI696 | 2006-07-21 12:28 | 2011-04-24 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Helsinki |
VZCZCXRO7598
RR RUEHAST
DE RUEHHE #0696/01 2021228
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 211228Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY HELSINKI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2195
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RHEFHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HELSINKI 000696
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SNAR PREL PGOV CVIS CPAS KCRM KFRD SMIG EUN FI
SUBJECT: EU-US INFORMAL SENIOR-LEVEL MEETING ON JUSTICE AND HOME
AFFAIRS COOPERATION
HELSINKI 00000696 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY. The U.S. and EU, under the chair of the Finnish
Presidency, met in Helsinki on July 18 for the Informal Senior Level
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) Meeting. Led by Acting INL DAS
Elizabeth Verville, DOJ liaison to USEU Mark Richard, and DHS Acting
A/S for Policy Development Paul Rosenzweig, USDEL continued its
ongoing dialogue on issues related to counterterrorism, law
enforcement, border security and migration. USDEL emphasized the
importance of building upon existing cooperation and improving
coordination, most notably to ensure a continuous flow of
information between respective law enforcement agencies. In this
regard, both sides welcomed the progress in negotiations for an
agreement between the U.S. and Eurojust, as well as the final
signature on the bilateral protocols that once ratified will enable
the implementation of the U.S.-EU Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) and
Extradition Treaties. In addition, EU representatives confirmed that
the passarelle option would be pursued under the Finnish Presidency
and expressed hope that a final decision could be taken by December,
which would thereby change decision making on justice related
issues. USDEL thanked the EU for receipt of its proposal for a
revised Passenger Name Record (PNR) agreement and welcomed future
discussions. EU participants stressed the urgency to come to an
agreement to cover the interim period, September 30, 2006 - November
2007, before a new agreement could be concluded. Lastly, EU reps
requested the U.S. confirm a date for the U.S.-EU JHA
Ministerial-Troika, proposed for November 6 in Washington. It was
also suggested to hold the JHA High Level Policy Dialogue on Border
and Transport Security (PDBTS) on the margins of the Ministerial
meeting. END SUMMARY.
Counterterrorism and Security
------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) EU reps provided a status report on the implementation of
the EU Counterterrorism (CT) Strategy. While the EU is making
progress on biometric requirements for passports, development of the
Schengen Information System (SIS) II is facing technical
difficulties and will likely not be ready by the April 2007
deadline. In response to a U.S. request for direct access for third
countries to SIS II data, the EU stated it would be difficult to
allow such access for political reasons, although there would be no
technical impediments to sharing. However, the EU is currently
exploring whether the Interpol database system could serve as an
alternative with respect to sharing of specific categories of data.
The European Commission (Commission) also reported it has been
consulting with private sector stakeholders on critical
infrastructure protection and on the development of detection
technologies in the field of CT. On the latter initiative, the
Commission will publish a green paper this summer and welcomes U.S.
input. In regards to the misuse of charities, the EU has held
discussions with the nonprofit sector, but indicated that it does
not intend to pursue a legislative approach at this stage as a way
to prevent terrorist support being accomplished via such charities.
¶3. (SBU) U.S. and EU participants agreed on the importance of
coordinating with G8 CT initiatives and of promoting further
research on terrorist's misuse of the Internet in order to tackle
radicalization and recruitment. Richard stressed the importance of
also focusing on operational issues in addition to concentrating on
public diplomacy initiatives. The Commission noted that an EU
delegation visited Washington on July 17 for consultations on the
EU's project to develop a non-emotive lexicon. The EU is also
establishing an expert advisory group that will issue two reports,
one on the state of current research on radicalization due in
November, and a second report on the phenomenon as such, which is
due to be released in January 2007. A/S Rosenzweig briefly
described DHS efforts in this area, including DHS Science and
Technology's research programs and civil integration initiatives in
Citizen and Immigrant Services and suggested that both sides
coordinate efforts to avoid unnecessary duplication.
¶4. (SBU) EU representatives stressed the importance of recent
dialogue with regard to human rights and terrorism, emphasizing the
importance of POTUS statements at the June Summit on the intention
to close the Guantanamo detention facility and the recent Supreme
Court ruling on military tribunals to try enemy combatants. USDEL
clarified that the Supreme Court ruling established Article III of
the Geneva Convention as being applicable to enemy combatants and
ruled that the system of military tribunals is inconsistent with
U.S. law, which is being addressed by Congress.
¶5. (U) Under this item, USDEL also introduced Jane Horvath, DOJ's
recently appointed Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer. She
provided EU delegates with an overview of the data protection model
in the U.S. government. In particular, she highlighted the focus on
the protection of privacy in the Administration's information
sharing efforts. [NOTE: On the margins, EU participants seemed very
eager to learn more about Horvath's function within the U.S. system,
HELSINKI 00000696 002.2 OF 003
particularly as it related to data protection and oversight. For
example, Eurojust extended an invitation for Horvath to brief the
organization on the Administration's data protection efforts.
Europol requested a copy of her office's upcoming, statutorily
mandated report. The EU Council Secretariat representative made
comparisons with Horvath regarding U.S. data protection and EU data
protection. He indicated a desire to learn more. END NOTE]
Justice and Law Enforcement Issues
----------------------------------
¶6. (SBU) Both sides praised the recent breakthrough in negotiations
for a U.S.-Eurojust agreement, and highlighted the possibility of a
signing ceremony at the U.S.-EU Ministerial in Washington this
November. Eurojust also indicated its intention to circulate a
questionnaire that once completed would assist in further
discussions on the use of intelligence in criminal proceedings. In
addition, with the final signature on the bilateral protocols of the
U.S.-EU Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) and Extradition Treaties, the
EU and U.S. agreed that training would be critical to ensure proper
and timely implementation, especially of the banking provision, and
should not wait until ratifications are complete.
¶7. (SBU) Europol also noted that three countries had yet to ratify
the third protocol to the Europol Convention, which would allow U.S.
access to Europol's analytical case files thereby increasing the
depth of operational cooperation. Europol indicated that it would
reach out to these remaining countries and USDEL indicated its
intention to do so as well. USDEL also highlighted the need to work
out processes for receiving requests from Europol as U.S. officials
based in Europol had yet to develop a solid relationship with their
Europol counterparts.
¶8. (SBU) In regard to the UN Convention against Corruption,
Verville highlighted ongoing discussions in advance of the
Conference of the States Parties (COSP) scheduled for December 2006
and stressed the importance of examining the core provisions,
including criminalization, international cooperation and asset
recovery. While monitoring would need to be looked at, Verville
noted that a solid base for implementation must first be
established. The Finnish rep expressed a preference to focus first
on a monitoring mechanism.
¶9. (SBU) In relation to the Balkans, USDEL noted that the draft
charter for SECI contained stringent data protection provisions that
would prevent cooperation with the U.S. EU reps indicated that a
second version is still in the drafting stages and offered no
further information. On counter-narcotics issues in Afghanistan, EU
reps reacted cautiously to a U.S. proposal for Member States to use
the 1988 UN Drug Convention as the basis for extradition of drug
traffickers as they foresaw problems related to jurisdiction in such
cases. Eurojust agreed to take the issue back to The Hague and
report the proposal to its members, getting back to the U.S. as soon
as possible.
¶10. (SBU) The EU reported that progress had been slow on the EU
draft Data Protection Framework Decision, but hoped to complete it
by end of this year. EU reps refused to comment on how this
Framework Decision could affect information sharing with third
country law enforcement, or how or whether existing agreements would
be preserved. Rosenzweig also highlighted for the EU that a vast
majority of current law enforcement cooperation is conducted
informally and outside the framework of formal agreements. The
Finns also indicated that they will be moving forward on the
passarelle option as a way to improve decision-making on justice and
police matters and hoped for a decision by December. Under this
option, unspecified justice issues would be moved from consensus
decision making by Member States (Third Pillar) to qualified
majority voting (First Pillar). Significantly, they would
thereafter fall within the ambit of the current Pillar One Data
Protection Directives, as well as Parliament involvement in any
proposed legislation.
¶11. (SBU) Finally, USDEL informed EU reps that the U.S. would soon
be placing an intellectual property (IP) enforcement coordinator in
Eastern Europe, in addition to placing permanent IP attaches in
select Embassies and Consulates. USDEL also provided an overview of
a meeting between FBI and the European Police College (CEPOL) to
discuss potential avenues of cooperation. The Commission emphasized
that cooperation with the U.S. would have to be approved by the
Council.
Migration, Borders and Visa Issues
----------------------------------
¶12. (SBU) USDEL thanked the EU for receipt of the EU's proposal for
a revised PNR agreement and welcomed future discussions. EU
participants stressed the urgency to come to an agreement to cover
the interim period, September 30, 2006 - November 2007. In addition,
HELSINKI 00000696 003.2 OF 003
EU reps noted that some Member States will need to invoke
Constitutional procedures to ratify a new agreement, which might not
happen until 2007. The EU hoped, but could not guarantee, that all
Member States could put an agreement into immediate effect on a
provisional basis, pending ultimate parliamentary endorsement.
¶13. (SBU) The Commission delegation noted that the release of their
latest report on visa reciprocity would likely be delayed until
September.
¶14. (SBU) Rosenzweig urged EU Member States to share lost and
stolen passport (LASP) data with Interpol and suggested that they
confiscate LASPs when found at borders - as the US is doing.
Frelick (State/CA) provided a progress report on administering U.S.
e-passports. In addition, the EU provided a brief overview of
FRONTEX, which was established to facilitate operational cooperation
at EU external borders. EU reps noted that FRONTEX was seeking to
establish working relationships with third countries and had thus
far reached out to Russian Border Guards. Rosenzweig indicated DHS
interest in working cooperatively, particularly on best practices,
and invited further discussion. Rosenzweig also discussed
developing aviation entry/exit screening in light of a possible
pandemic to avoid stopping all international travel, and asked the
EU to consider working with us to develop a common set of protocols
or standards. The EU reps cautioned that data protection would need
to be addressed before such cooperation could ensue which might
include any effort to identify individual travelers.
Other Issues
------------
¶15. (SBU) At the end of the meeting, German Director General Gunter
Krause questioned when the Finnish Presidency would conduct the
expert group meeting, as indicated in the May 4, Vienna communiqu,
to discuss the future EU-U.S.-Russian tripartite cooperation and
make recommendations for the German Presidency. Verville inquired
as to what topics the EU/Presidencies had in mind, as well as the
advantages and recommendations of such a dialogue. Verville
suggested that the U.S. and EU discuss respective bilateral
cooperation with Russia in advance of conducting a meeting that
included other countries. She also added that while the U.S.
remained open to the concept, she was not in a position to put forth
any suggestions as the U.S. had not yet identified discussion topics
that would achieve concrete benefits. The EU Presidency agreed with
Verville's summation and suggestion. [NOTE: On the margins of the
dinner, Krause, sensing a lack of enthusiasm from Finland or in
Germany raised with Verville and Rosenzweig an uncleared proposal to
continue the four Presidency-U.S.-Russian dialogue by, in essence,
expanding the tripartite meeting with Russia to include Azerbaijan,
Armenia, Moldova and Georgia. In response to Verville's question as
to what they would expect to raise/achieve in such an expanded
meeting, Krause said he was looking for answers, but did not have
one himself. Krause said they would await an answer/reaction from
the U.S., and Verville replied that such an answer would be
facilitated by knowing what they had in mind by way of an agenda and
outcomes. END NOTE]
¶16. (U) The U.S. delegation included: Elizabeth Verville, State
Acting INL DAS; Paul Rosenzweig, DHS Acting A/S for Policy
Development; Mark Richard, DOJ Liaison to USEU; Kathleen Conway, CBP
Liaison to USEU; Christine Cline, State/INL; Timothy Eydelnant, Emb
Helsinki; Alcy Frelick, State/CA; Jane Horvath, DOJ; Kenneth Kolb,
Emb Helsinki; Alessandro Nardi, State/EUR; Kenneth Prop, State/L;
Michael Scardaville, DHS; and Jessica Steffens, State/INL.
¶17. (U) EU participants included: Antti Pelttari, Director General
for the International Security Affairs Unit in the Finnish Ministry
of Interior; Matti Jousten, EU-Coordinator in the Finnish Ministry
of Justice; Giles de Kerchove, Director in the EU Council
Secretariat; Paul Hickey, Director in the EU Council Secretariat;
SIPDIS
Marque Tung-Lai, Director of JLS General Affairs in the European
Commission; Jan De Ceuster, Head of the Unit on Borders and Visas in
the European Commission; Roelof-Jan Manshot, Vice-President of
Eurojust; Maz-Peter Ratzel, Director of Europol; Michael Grotz,
Deputy Director General of German Federal Ministry of Justice;
Gunter Krause, German Federal Ministry of the Interior; as well as
Vivian Loonela, Administrator in the European Commission; Christiane
Hohmann, Administrator in the European Commission; Kari Rantama,
Finnish Deputy National Police Commissioner; Pentti Visanen, Finnish
Immigration Department; Kalle Kekomaki, Finnish Ministry of
Interior; Elina Isoksela, Finnish Ministry of Justice; Sakari
Vourensola, Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA); Leena
Kiukkonen, Finnish MFA; Juha Rainne, Finnish MFA; Hikka Nenonen,
Finnish MFA; and, Veli-Pekka Rautava, Finnish MFA.
¶18. (U) This cable has been cleared by the U.S. Delegation.
WARE