

Currently released so far... 12648 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AEMR
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AMCHAMS
AGMT
AADP
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BX
BT
BP
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CR
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CODEL
COPUOS
CIA
CFED
CARSON
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CN
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
EPET
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
ENIV
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ENNP
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXIM
ERNG
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IO
IT
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
IDP
ICTR
IEFIN
IRC
ITRA
ITALY
INRB
INTELSAT
IBET
IRAQI
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KIRF
KSEO
KVPR
KSEP
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KRIM
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KMFO
KMOC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KREC
KX
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTRE
MASC
MG
MARAD
MRCRE
MW
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NATIONAL
NGO
NR
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OECD
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PCI
PG
POGOV
PHUMPGOV
PEL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PMIL
POV
PRL
PDOV
PTBS
PRAM
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
ROOD
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SG
SPCE
SK
STEINBERG
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SEN
SANC
SWE
SHI
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
THPY
TP
TBID
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UY
UNCHR
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNMIK
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
USUN
USNC
UNIDROIT
UNO
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA1104, SCENESETTER: CANADA AND THE SPP
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA1104.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA1104 | 2005-04-13 11:57 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 001104
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR WHA, E, WHA/CA, EB/TPP/BTA/EWH, L/LEI
DHS OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS (MARMAUD)
STATE PASS USTR (CHANDLER, SHIGETOMI)
USDOC FOR 4320/ITA/MAC/WH/ONIA/BASTIAN/WORD/FOX
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD ECIN PREL CA
SUBJECT: SCENESETTER: CANADA AND THE SPP
REFS: (A) Ottawa 268; (B) 2004 Ottawa 3431 (C) Ottawa 940;
(D) Ottawa 1029 (E) Ottawa 999
¶1. (U) This is the first in a series of cables offering
Mission views and background information on elements of the
Security and Prosperity Partnership. This cable outlines
some political and economic factors in Canada that may
affect progress toward SPP goals.
¶2. (SBU) Summary: The Security and Prosperity Partnership
has met with applause from major groups within Canada,
although some interest groups are critical. On the security
side, we are building on the solid foundation of the Smart
Border process, and Canadian policy will continue to be
driven by the desire to meet U.S. security needs to keep the
border open and moving.
On the prosperity side, the government's course is less well-
charted. A growing anxiety about Canada's continued access
to U.S. markets has fueled a lively debate over the last few
years on how to build on NAFTA, and business groups have
welcomed SPP as the first step on that road. Regulatory
cooperation enjoys broad support from business but will
continue to raise sovereignty concerns among traditional
opponents of freer trade.
Despite GOC commitment to SPP, there are management and
political obstacles on the Canadian side to early major
results. They include potential resistance from the
agencies responsible for making the regulatory changes;
weaknesses in the Canadian regulatory process, and growing
threats to survival of the Martin government. Finally, the
SPP prosperity agenda does not address the elephants outside
the tent: Canadian frustration with NAFTA dispute
settlement and the continuing ban on live cattle imports.
SPP will therefore not necessarily be seen as a major win
for Canada, and the Martin government has not attempted to
sell it as a "big bang" breakthrough. However, a set of
pragmatic and balanced deliverables could create momentum
for continuing and perhaps tackling bigger challenges
through the SPP process.
The Security Agenda: Broad Support, Hard Problems
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶3. (SBU) A broad consensus, and developed bilateral
framework, supports the objectives outlined in the security
agenda. The Smart Border Action Plan, initiated in 2001,
created a successful framework for systematically addressing
border issues. The Smart Border concept enjoys broad
support among business and local governments on both sides
of the border as well as in Ottawa, and has been an
important element in rebuilding public confidence that
security and trade can go hand in hand. The current
government has aggressively reorganized Canadian security
and border agencies and has backed up its commitment to
border security with CAD 1 billion in new funding for border
security in the 2005 budget.
¶5. (SBU) For the GOC, the hardest part of the border
equation will be addressing infrastructure bottlenecks,
which result as much from trade growth as from new security
requirements, while balancing the interests of a multitude
of provincial, municipal and private stakeholders. The
difficulty of finding popular and affordable solutions to
infrastructure problems makes it likely that the GOC will
continue to look for procedural fixes, such as reverse
clearance and other proposals to move processing away from
the border, some of which may be problematic for us.
Canadian entry procedures for goods also continue to
concentrate processing on the border, making entry more
cumbersome than under the U.S. system.
¶6. (SBU) While ministers have repeatedly expressed their
determination to prevent terrorist attacks on the U.S. from
within Canada, and have allocated considerable resources to
maritime and aviation security, so far they seem to be less
concerned about potential dangers coming north by land. DPM
McLellan is resisting calls from Canadian customs and law
enforcement unions to beef up or streamline its balkanized
border apparatus, divided between unarmed customs officers
and thinly spread RCMP detachments responsible for
enforcement (Ref C).
Prosperity Agenda: A Path Less Clear
--------------------------------------------- --
¶7. (SBU) For the past few years, Canadian officials,
academics and private sector representatives have been
conducting a lively debate on the future of Canada's trade
policy. After ten years of NAFTA, which have shifted
Canada's economy onto an even more pronounced North-South
axis, few people here doubt that relations with the U.S. are
central to Canada's future as a trading nation. The GOC's
efforts to expand markets elsewhere, which include
negotiating initiatives with various Asian and Latin
countries as well as a nebulous framework agreement with the
EU, cannot substantially alter that reality. At the same
time, early, rapid trade gains under NAFTA have moderated;
Canadian exports to the U.S. began to stagnate in the new
millennium and have only recently returned to 2000 levels,
and the rising Canadian dollar has generated anxiety about
future export trends. Having absorbed the early benefits of
NAFTA, many Canadians have begun to focus on its
shortcomings, notably its failure to restrain U.S.
antidumping and countervailing duty actions (despite the
fact that this was never an element of the agreement).
Concern about the "border effect", which predated but was
vastly heightened by 9/11, has shaken Canadian confidence in
the security of its access to its prime export market, and
the BSE crisis and softwood lumber dispute have strengthened
doubts about the ability of NAFTA institutions to protect
Canadian interests.
¶8. (SBU) Arguments about the best course to pursue with the
U.S. have fallen into two major categories: the "big bang"
and the "incrementalist" approach. In the first category,
groups such as the Canadian Council of Chief Executives have
offered a range of ambitious options, including a "North
American security perimeter" in which border and defense
policies would be harmonized in order to allow trade to flow
freely, and a customs union. The incrementalists, who
include the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, have argued that
no political will exists on either side for grand projects,
and that pragmatically addressing individual barriers one by
one would be more feasible and cost-effective. In that
context, the "prosperity" side of the SPP may be seen as an
endorsement of the incrementalist approach.
¶9. (SBU) Regardless of their previous positions, major
business groups have applauded SPP and are eager to support
implementation, particularly since they do not want this
initiative to lose momentum. On the regulatory side, the
private sector is solidly in favor of harmonizing North
American standards to the extent possible. The private-
sector Executive Advisory Committee on Smart Regulation (Ref
B.) told GOC policymakers frankly that the norm should be
development of North American standards, even if that meant,
in many cases, adopting U.S. standards.
¶10. (SBU) This view, however, is not universal. Despite
occasional admissions that some U.S. regulatory mechanisms,
for example in the environmental arena, may well outperform
Canada's, many Canadians tend to assume that Canada is
generally cleaner, healthier and safer than the U.S. (Even
U.S. policies and programs, such as Energy Star, that are
adopted by Canada are often assumed to be of Canadian
origin. In the same vein, Canadian opposition to oil
exploration in ANWR allows many Canadians to feel morally
superior, while ignoring the impact of energy development in
the Canadian wilderness.) The "Smart Regulation" initiative
has already aroused the ire of traditional anti-trade groups
and those concerned about Canadian sovereignty. Sounding a
familiar note, Maude Barlow of the (economic nationalist)
Council of Canadians predicted that SPP would have dire
effects on Canadian sovereignty and the privacy of
individual Canadians. Among other things, she charged that
SPP would "strip Canada of its ability to set safe standards
for its citizens". Mixed press response to SPP also
reflected, along with support for closer engagement,
traditional concerns about sovereignty and distrust of the
U.S.
¶11. (SBU) Aside from lingering pockets of opposition to
economic integration per se, the GOC may also face a
struggle in moving change quickly through its regulatory
apparatus. While Canadian regulatory processes follow a
process similar to that of the U.S., with PCO retaining the
oversight and coordination role of OMB, central coordination
appears to be considerably weaker. Private sector critics,
among them Smart Regulation advisors, charge that current
regulatory processes are too stovepiped and do not generate
adequate outside input, even from other GOC agencies. The
Smart Regulation program envisions various institutional
changes to address this problem, including a stronger
mandate for PCO, but it remains a work in (early) progress.
¶12. (SBU) The domestic political atmosphere may also make
it difficult for the GOC to achieve quick progress on
regulatory issues. Martin's minority government has faced
repeated challenges in recent months, with a no-confidence
measure seemingly always around the corner. In the current
round, explosive revelations from an ongoing public inquiry,
pointing to a pattern of government kickbacks to the Liberal
Party, have already distracted the government and could well
result in a vote of no confidence by the end of the year.
The opposition has already flexed its muscles in other
areas. In a major rebuff, Parliament vetoed a government
order separating International Trade Canada from Foreign
Affairs, leaving Canada's trade negotiators in legal limbo
after almost a year of frantic administrative revamping and
personnel shifts. Growing conflict with provinces over
fiscal issues (ref D) will also affect progress on any
broader regulatory reform program. Provinces, which play a
major role in regulation, may resist Ottawa's attempts to
press them into international commitments.
Conclusion
--------------
¶13. (SBU) Despite these complicating factors, SPP clearly
offers a framework to move forward pragmatically on trade
barriers and irritants and to promote our existing border
agenda. There is potential synergy between SPP goals and
Canada's Smart Regulation initiative. Moreover, SPP can
help fold in and raise the profile of productive bilateral
discussions already underway in areas such as energy,
agriculture and the environment, providing a welcome balance
to endless coverage of trade disputes. We believe it will
remain a priority for the GOC; PCO officials have already
made it clear that they will continue to coordinate and
press Canadian departments for results. (Details on PCO's
plans for organizing the Canadian end of SPP will follow
septel.)
¶14. (SBU) In the long term, an established process, and the
pressure to produce results in advance of high-level
meetings, can help us attack regulatory issues more
systematically. However, in the meantime the inherent value
of stronger regulatory cooperation is likely to continue to
be overshadowed by the elephants outside the tent: the long-
running dispute over U.S. antidumping and countervailing
duties on softwood and the continued closure of the border
to live cattle imports, which are sapping enthusiasm for
free trade in some of its strongest former constituencies.
The risk remains that voters affected by major trade
problems will resent a bilateral initiative that appears to
require Canadian concessions but does not deliver on their
big concerns, a point we need to take into account as we
develop the SPP agenda.