

Currently released so far... 12648 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AEMR
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AMCHAMS
AGMT
AADP
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BX
BT
BP
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CR
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CODEL
COPUOS
CIA
CFED
CARSON
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CN
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
EPET
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
ENIV
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ENNP
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXIM
ERNG
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IO
IT
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
IDP
ICTR
IEFIN
IRC
ITRA
ITALY
INRB
INTELSAT
IBET
IRAQI
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KIRF
KSEO
KVPR
KSEP
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KRIM
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KMFO
KMOC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KREC
KX
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTRE
MASC
MG
MARAD
MRCRE
MW
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NATIONAL
NGO
NR
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OECD
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PCI
PG
POGOV
PHUMPGOV
PEL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PMIL
POV
PRL
PDOV
PTBS
PRAM
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
ROOD
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SG
SPCE
SK
STEINBERG
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SEN
SANC
SWE
SHI
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
THPY
TP
TBID
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UY
UNCHR
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNMIK
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
USUN
USNC
UNIDROIT
UNO
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA2970, CANADIAN STAKEHOLDERS' CONCERNS ON COPYRIGHT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA2970.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA2970 | 2005-10-04 18:21 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
041821Z Oct 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 002970
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DEPT PASS USTR FOR CHANDLER AND ESPINEL
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD KIPR CA
SUBJECT: CANADIAN STAKEHOLDERS' CONCERNS ON COPYRIGHT
AMENDMENT, SPECIAL 301 OCR, AND ENFORCEMENT
REF: A. OTTAWA 2833 (DEMARCHE ON SPECIAL 301
OUT-OF-CYCLE REVIEW)
¶B. SECSTATE 173476 (DEMARCHE ON SPECIAL 301
OUT-OF-CYCLE REVIEW)
¶C. OTTAWA 1168 (CANADIAN REACTION TO GOC'S PROPOSED
COPYRIGHT LAW AMENDMENTS)
¶1. (SBU) Summary: We have met again with intellectual
property (IP) rightsholders to discuss their views of GOC
moves on IPR. Canadian industry frustration with ineffective
IPR enforcement continues to grow, and further review of the
proposed copyright amendment legislation (C-60) has revealed
some complexities and emerging disagreement among
stakeholders. The Canadian Motion Picture Distributors
Association (CMPDA) also raised a new issue: camcording of
new-release movies in theaters, which seems to be a
significant problem in Canada. End Summary.
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COPYRIGHT ACT
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶2. (SBU) In our meetings with IP rightsholders in Ottawa and
Toronto, we found that most stakeholder concerns with C-60,
the draft legislation to amend Canada's Copyright Act, were
familiar (see Ottawa 1168). However, time has fine-tuned
industry concerns and highlighted subtle differences in
stakeholder positions.
¶3. (SBU) Internet Service Provider (ISP) Liability: For
example, while the current USG action plan and U.S.
stakeholders emphasize the need for a notice-and-takedown
regime, Canadian industry opinions are mixed on the need to
push for notice-and-takedown. The Canadian Motion Picture
Distributors Association (CMPDA) is satisfied with the
current notice-and-notice proposal in the draft legislation,
hoping that the record-keeping requirements for ISPs will
help their industry keep track of actions against online
infringers. In CMPDA's view, the advent of peer-to-peer
filesharing has lessened the need for notice-and-takedown,
since fewer users are downloading their files from large
websites of infringing material. On the other hand, the
Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA), Canadian
Alliance Against Software Theft (CAAST) and U.S.-based
Business Software Alliance (BSA) representatives strongly
believe that their industries still need a
notice-and-takedown regime. This divergence seems to depend
on how an industry's products are pirated and how
recalcitrant they anticipate the GOC will be on the issue.
Entertainment Software Association (ESA) representatives
opined that the GOC "isn't going to budge" on the issue of
notice-and-notice, possibly because of fears that a
notice-and-takedown regime could be unconstitutional in
Canada. C-60's general waiver of ISP liability was deemed
overly broad by all stakeholders; they felt that the waiver
of liability shouldn't be a blank check and that ISPs should
be held responsible for the content of their users' websites
once they become aware of the presence of copyright
infringing files.
¶4. (SBU) Trafficking in circumvention "tools" (devices and
software): Even in this area, which generally prompts a
chorus seeking a ban against trafficking in tools to
circumvent technological protection measures (TPM), industry
associations were not entirely in agreement. CMPDA, CRIA,
CAAST, and ESA are all firmly pushing for trafficking in TPM
circumvention tools to be made illegal. Currently the draft
legislation requires that the rightholder prove "intent to
infringe" for trafficking in tools to be illegal, and as one
industry representative points out, they already need to
prove intent and therefore this legislative change doesn't
give them any more ability to fight piracy. Industry
representatives would also like a law that allows them to go
after the larger-scale pirates selling circumvention tools,
rather than continuing to have to go after the "little guys"
who use them. However, the Information Technology Association
of Canada (ITAC) represents security firms who occasionally
circumvent TPMs, either to test their efficacy or to create
fixes for various holes in the security. ITAC says that
these niche activities need the protection of the "intent"
clause, although others argue that circumvention for reasons
other than infringement could be specifically exempted in the
legislation or could fall under 'fair use'. Prompted by its
cyber-security members, ITAC therefore opposes any move to
make trafficking in or creating TPM circumvention tools
illegal and supports the current requirement to prove intent
to infringe. (SBU comment: In an off-hand remark, an ITAC
VP mentioned that ITAC may feel the need to "push the other
side" to balance the anticipated lobbying from ESA, who will
push strongly for trafficking in circumvention tools to be
illegal regardless of intent. End comment.)
¶5. (SBU) Circumvention of TPMs intended to prevent access:
In what the CMPDA characterizes as a possible oversight in
the draft legislation, C-60 does not seem to make
circumvention of TPMs intended to prevent access (as opposed
to distribution) an offense. As with other issues of TPM
circumvention, the major industry associations hope to fix
this omission in the upcoming committee hearings on the draft
legislation.
¶6. (SBU) No criminal sanctions for infringement: CRIA, ESA
and CMPDA note that the WIPO treaties require "effective"
deterrents to copyright infringement. C-60 as drafted does
not provide any criminal provisions for circumvention, which
CRIA and CMPDA believe will mean that Canada does not have
adequate legal protection and effective remedies against
copyright infringement. An ESA representative pointed out
that the original Heritage Committee recommendations for
legislation included a recommendation for criminal provisions
for circumvention. (Comment: Per reftels, Heritage Canada's
stronger stance on IPR protection has been generally
undermined by Industry Canada's pressure for "balance." End
comment.)
¶7. (SBU) Can C-60 be saved?: One of the most contentious
insights that has arisen during recent consultations with IPR
stakeholders is the question of whether stakeholders even
want the bill to pass. Some industry representatives
predicted that the bill will "die on paper" and criticized
the potential for amending it in committee as likely to
result in "a mess". These representatives expressed the
expectation and hope that the legislation would be scrapped
and described as a best-case-scenario the legislation dying
after oral submissions (so that industries could make
comments.) On the other hand, when asked if they wanted the
bill to die, other industry representative seemed surprised
and explained that their members would rather see this draft
fixed, since if the bill dies, progress will be delayed for
another year.
CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
--------------------
¶8. (SBU) Numerous stakeholders noted that Justice Ministry,
Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) and Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) top priorities--terrorism, the border,
and counterfeits with safety issues like fake
pharmaceuticals--do not currently leave much attention or
funding for copyright protection. Anecdotal evidence of
progress, including RCMP training and minor counterfeit
seizures, was countered by general frustration over CBSA's
lack of power and all three agencies' inaction. Since RCMP
and Customs often do not respond to industry information on
infringement, Embassy has requested greater industry feedback
on industry's own enforcement actions. CMPDA gave an example
of a private seizure of 11,000 counterfeit DVDs from one
store in Toronto's Pacific Mall. (After giving the owner a
list of counterfeit DVDs that the owner agreed to hand over,
CMPDA officials were not surprised to return the next day to
find the store completely restocked...with counterfeit DVDs.)
ESA representatives also indicated that they intend to lobby
for more RCMP resources to combat copyright infringement;
they also hope to find a way for CBSA to have more power to
seize shipments (although ESA and CMPDA mentioned that the
border may become less important as Canadian-made
counterfeiting increases). Obviously enforcement is an
ongoing issue for IPR stakeholders, and we will provide
further information as we receive it. (Comment: one contact
told econoff of a recent discussion with a prominent IPR
lawyer who suggested that industry associations not even try
for criminal sanctions for TPM circumvention in C-60, since
it would not be enforced and therefore would be just one more
toothless law on the books. End comment.)
CAMCORDING IN THEATERS
-----------------------
¶9. CMPDA raised a new issue in meetings last week:
camcording new-release movies in theaters to create
counterfeit DVDs that often hit the streets within hours of
the official movie premiers. Because movies open in Canada
at the same time as in the United States, and because movies
in Canada are shown in both French and English, Canada has
become a primary source for camcorded counterfeits. In fact,
according to CMPDA, of all theaters which are used for
camcording new-release movies, 40 percent are in Canada, with
the majority of that 40 percent coming from just two theaters
in Montreal. CMPDA has worked with the theater owners in
question and is engaged in training their staff to combat
this activity, but without any law against camcording in
theaters, options are limited. RCMP and the local police
can't do anything without proof of commercial intent, and
generally the best CMPDA can hope for is that the offenders
will be ejected from the theater for that particular showing.
CMPDA is developing an estimate of the economic loss from
this sort of piracy, which they hope to use to prompt an
amendment to the criminal code outlawing camcording in
theaters. We have requested a copy of their loss estimates
when compiled, and we will continue to follow this issue
closely.
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
WILKINS