

Currently released so far... 12648 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AEMR
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AMCHAMS
AGMT
AADP
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BX
BT
BP
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CR
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CODEL
COPUOS
CIA
CFED
CARSON
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CN
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
EPET
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
ENIV
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ENNP
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXIM
ERNG
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IO
IT
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
IDP
ICTR
IEFIN
IRC
ITRA
ITALY
INRB
INTELSAT
IBET
IRAQI
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KIRF
KSEO
KVPR
KSEP
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KRIM
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KMFO
KMOC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KREC
KX
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTRE
MASC
MG
MARAD
MRCRE
MW
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NATIONAL
NGO
NR
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OECD
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PCI
PG
POGOV
PHUMPGOV
PEL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PMIL
POV
PRL
PDOV
PTBS
PRAM
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
ROOD
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SG
SPCE
SK
STEINBERG
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SEN
SANC
SWE
SHI
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
THPY
TP
TBID
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UY
UNCHR
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNMIK
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
USUN
USNC
UNIDROIT
UNO
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07BERLIN791, MARCH 29 MEETING OF THE G-8 GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07BERLIN791.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07BERLIN791 | 2007-04-18 18:04 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Berlin |
VZCZCXYZ0006
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHRL #0791/01 1081804
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 181804Z APR 07
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7971
INFO RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 8172
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1766
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1010
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 8700
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 0440
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 1434
UNCLAS BERLIN 000791
SIPDIS
STATE FOR ISN/CTR, EUR, WHA/CAN, AND EAP/J
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL ETTC KNNP CBW TRGY GM JA RS CA
SUBJECT: MARCH 29 MEETING OF THE G-8 GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP
WORKING GROUP IN BERLIN
REF: A. BERLIN 535
¶B. BERLIN 244
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The third G-8 Global Partnership Working
Group (GPWG) meeting under the German G-8 Presidency took
place in Berlin March 29. The Chair opened with a discussion
of a draft document which reviewed the first five years of
the Global Partnership (GP). Some delegations complained
that they had insufficient time to review the draft properly,
and other delegations, including the U.S., noted the lack of
mention of the GP's future beyond 2012, even though the
delegations during the February 28 GPWG meeting had discussed
expanding the GP geographically and in scope. After some
discussion, the Chair agreed to redraft the review document
and re-circulate it. The GPWG also discussed the Northern
Dimension Environmental Partnership (NDEP), recent
developments in GP projects, and whether the GPWG would push
for a G-8 Leaders' Statement on nonproliferation, which would
include mention of the GP. Most delegations agreed that the
GP should draft a leaders' statement for this year's G-8
Summit in June. DAS Semmel informed the other delegates that
since the item was not on the agenda he would not table a
U.S. draft but noted that the issue would surface in the
Political Directors meeting the following week. He also
mentioned that a U.S. paper proposing an outline for GP
expansion would be distributed at the Political Director's
meeting. End Summary.
¶2. (SBU) German MFA Commissioner for Economic Affairs and
Sustainable Development Viktor Elbling chaired the morning
session of the March 29 GPWG meeting. He opened the meeting
with a discussion of a German-produced draft, "Global
Partnership Review," which had been circulated to GPWG
partners on March 26. The partners had agreed at the
previous GPWG meeting February 28 that Germany would produce
a draft consisting of three parts: I. Main Achievements, II.
Lessons Learned, and III. Future Priorities. Elbling
explained the Germans' intent was to produce a concise paper
versus a comprehensive document and asked for responses.
Most delegates expressed appreciation for the brevity of the
document, but some complained that it was distributed too
late for appropriate consideration or for domestic
inter-agency consultations. The British, U.S., and Canadian
delegates queried why Part III lacked any mention of the
future of GP beyond 2012, when delegations had expressed
general support for this at the February 28 meeting. DAS
Semmel said the GP needs to consider its priorities beyond
2012, because proliferation threats will not stop then nor
remain what they were in 2002, when the GP was created. He
outlined the future as: fulfilling existing GP commitments in
the next five years, expanding the GP beyond Russia and
former Soviet Union states, extending it beyond 2012,
determining the threats of the future, and making additional
financial commitments to GP projects after 2012. He informed
the group that the U.S. would table a paper outlining U.S.
thinking on this in the Political Directors' meeting on April
3, 2007.
¶3. (SBU) British Delegate Berenice Gare said the review
document, in addition to mentioning expansion, should prompt
G-8 leaders to re-state their commitment to GP. Without
renewed commitment from the leaders, the GP is liable to
diminish in importance after 2012, even though the world will
face new threats. To the Chair's comment that the draft
review document purposely excluded mentioning expansion
beyond 2012 because it is difficult to commit the G-8 leaders
to something that far in advance, Canadian Delegate Troy
Lulashnyk said even if the GPWG cannot bind governments to
such commitments, the nuclear-related threat will extend
beyond 2012. He suggested that the review document could
cover the scope beyond 2012 without shackling the leaders and
noted that the Kananaskis Accords of 2002 describe a much
wider mandate for the GP than it has exercised to date. He
said the Global Partnership was always intended to be global
and geographical expansion beyond Russia and the FSU should
not detract from the ongoing commitments to them. British
Delegate Gare noted the first GP document, released at the
2002 G-8 Summit in Kananaskis, Canada, bound the leaders to a
10-year commitment, so the precedent for long-range
commitments and foresight was already set. She said it would
be unfair to the G-8 leaders if the GPWG indicated that all
the nuclear threat issues will be solved by 2012. Italian
Delegate Antonio Catalano di Melilli agreed the GPWG should
look at new projects and expand the scope, noting that
because of the early focus on projects in Russia, several
worthy proposals for projects in other countries were
dismissed.
¶4. (SBU) French Delegate Camille Grand advocated adding some
specific figures to Part II, such as citing how many Russian
nuclear submarines had been dismantled so far, to indicate GP
successes to date. Russian Delegate Ruzhkov argued against
including any figures in the review document and said, as it
was, Part II had too many technical details. He added the
review document should be a political document and not a
technical paper. All delegates agreed figures attract
controversy and delay, but also acknowledged the usefulness
of concrete references and examples.
¶5. (SBU) DAS Semmel and other delegates emphasized that the
review document should have a positive tone. The GP, despite
some difficulties in implementing some projects, has been a
success story and made the world safer with the dismantling
of decommissioned Russian nuclear submarines, securing
nuclear facilities in Russian and the FSU, and destroying
chemical weapon stockpiles in the U.S. and Russia. He noted
further that the GP has been successful despite the absence
of any permanent bureaucracy or institutional infrastructure.
¶6. (SBU) Elbling ended the discussion by offering to redraft
the review document and circulate it by April 5 with the
proviso that the delegates respond within 10 days. He agreed
that the next draft would reflect the positive character of
GP work and the outstanding achievements.
¶7. (SBU) Thomas Meister, Director of the German MFA's
International Energy and Nuclear Energy Policy and Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Division, then assumed the chair. He
opened discussion on the Northern Dimension Environmental
Partnership (NDEP). Because NDEP has an environmental
dimension, he raised the issue of whether it belonged under
GP auspices. After some discussion, most delegates agreed
that it fit within the GP's scope. The UK representatives
advised that the GP "keep a gentle eye" on NDEP, and the
Russian Delegation urged the NDEP's Coordinating Committee to
work more closely with the GP.
¶8. (SBU) The Chair then opened discussion on recent
developments in GP projects. The delegates gave updates on
various projects since the February 28 meeting. Canadian
Delegate Lulashnyk mentioned Canada was negotiating with
Russia to establish a bio-containment facility to house
biological warfare-related equipment coming from Central
Asian countries.
¶9. (SBU) DAS Semmel, under Other Business, raised the issue
of a Leaders' Statement. He advocated inserting a comment
about GP expansion in the G-8 Summit Declaration. (Note: In
sidebar discussions, the British and Canadian delegates
agreed with DAS Semmel on this issue. End note.) Semmel
noted the G-8 Political Directors would discuss such an
insertion at their April 3 meeting in Berlin. Meister said
he would raise the issue with his government but was
noncommittal.
¶10. (SBU) Comment: The meeting went well, considering the
perplexing, truncated draft five-year review document which
the German MFA had circulated with only three days' notice.
The draft had excluded much of the third portion of the
review document, i.e., the future of the GP, which had taken
up considerable discussion time and preparation in the
February 27-28 meetings. Dietrich Becker of the MFA said in
a sidebar meeting that the German draft was purposely
designed to cover only the consensus language and what was
excluded was to be discussed at the March 29 meeting. Given
that Japan will assume the G-8 Presidency in 2008, it should
be noted that the Japanese delegation during lunch expounded
on previous comments that domestic concerns make it difficult
for their government to sustain continued support for the GP
beyond its current commitments. The German delegates and
others echoed these concerns. They added that to the extent
that the GP is known, it is equated with supporting work in a
now oil-rich Russia. Conversations with these and other
delegates during recent meetings indicate that developing a
compelling rationale for GP expansion requires very careful
consideration of the individual motives, security concerns,
and priorities of each GP member. The support from most
members for expansion seems genuine but might lack internal
support in their governments, when compared to the US,
British, and Canadian positions. This means that a
compelling case must be made to skeptical domestic political
figures and audiences for expanding the partnership so that
the GP can adjust to new global realities and combat WMD
threats. Moving the U.S. proposal to extend and expand the
GP will be difficult and will need to be elevated to more
senior levels to gain greater traction. End Comment.
¶11. (SBU) This cable was coordinated with DAS Semmel
subsequent to the delegation's departure.
TIMKEN JR