

Currently released so far... 12648 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AEMR
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AMCHAMS
AGMT
AADP
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BX
BT
BP
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CR
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CODEL
COPUOS
CIA
CFED
CARSON
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CN
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
EPET
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
ENIV
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ENNP
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXIM
ERNG
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IO
IT
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
IDP
ICTR
IEFIN
IRC
ITRA
ITALY
INRB
INTELSAT
IBET
IRAQI
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KIRF
KSEO
KVPR
KSEP
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KRIM
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KMFO
KMOC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KREC
KX
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTRE
MASC
MG
MARAD
MRCRE
MW
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NATIONAL
NGO
NR
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OECD
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PCI
PG
POGOV
PHUMPGOV
PEL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PMIL
POV
PRL
PDOV
PTBS
PRAM
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
ROOD
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SG
SPCE
SK
STEINBERG
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SEN
SANC
SWE
SHI
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
THPY
TP
TBID
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UY
UNCHR
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNMIK
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
USUN
USNC
UNIDROIT
UNO
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05WELLINGTON702, NZ ELECTIONS: WHAT'S IN IT FOR US?
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05WELLINGTON702.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05WELLINGTON702 | 2005-09-13 00:33 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | SECRET//NOFORN | Embassy Wellington |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
130033Z Sep 05
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000702
SIPDIS
NOFORN
STATE FOR D (FRITZ), EAP/ANP, EAP/RSP, EAP/EP, INR/EAP
NSC FOR VICTOR CHA AND MICHAEL GREEN
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISA LIZ PHU
PACOM FOR J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/11/2015
TAGS: PGOV PREL NZ
SUBJECT: NZ ELECTIONS: WHAT'S IN IT FOR US?
REF: A. WELLINGTON 696
¶B. WELLINGTON 695
¶C. WELLINGTON 682
¶D. WELLINGTON 635
¶E. WELLINGTON 594
¶F. WELLINGTON 566
Classified By: Charge D'Affaires David R. Burnett,
for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
¶1. (C) Summary: No matter who wins New Zealand's general
elections this Saturday, the stage is set for a comprehensive
U.S.-New Zealand dialogue should Washington desire one. Well
before the election, Labour officials indicated they would
welcome such an exchange, and even in coalition with the
Greens that position will not change. National would also
welcome a dialogue as a way to improve ties, although
ironically they would be less able to engage us publicly.
Labour, which would gain from close ties with us if in
Government, would in opposition win more by opposing
National's efforts to engage us. Embassy has had several
preparatory discussions with senior Foreign Affairs and
Defense officials to prepare for a dialogue should Washington
decide to move forward. End Summary.
--------------------------------
Dialogue with Labour Is Possible
--------------------------------
¶2. (C) New Zealand's closest general election campaign in a
decade is winding down. The stakes are high for the Kiwi
voter in this very close race: Labour and National represent
truly different policy choices. But the consequences for
U.S.-New Zealand relations may be less extreme: either party
should be open to new, comprehensive US-New Zealand talks if
Washington decides such a dialogue is in order. Either party
would also have to work around obstacles to pursue such
talks.
¶3. (C) As noted refs E and F, Labour has not been shy about
playing the anti-American card during this campaign. A
Labour-Green victory would not, however, preclude a
productive, comprehensive US-NZ dialogue as called for by
former Ambassador Swindells. Well before the campaign,
Labour officials had been quietly leaving themselves room for
such an exchange.
¶4. (C) There are many reasons for this. For all the Labour
Government's annoying tendencies to declare unilaterally that
the nuclear ban no longer matters to the United States, Prime
Minister Clark, Foreign Minister Goff and others recognize
the ban is an impediment to better relations with us and has
adverse effects on regional security. Obviously, their desire
for a free trade agreement is a motivating factor in
maintaining ties. But these leaders also recognize that
without a good relationship with the United States, the
Government is vulnerable to opposition charges that Labour is
too close to China and too far apart from New Zealand's
second largest trading partner. The opposition will only be
stronger in such attacks against a left-leaning, Labour-Green
alliance. Senior Government leaders also know -- more than
the Party caucus or backbenchers do -- that New Zealand
benefits from its remaining military and intelligence ties
with the United States. The country's engagements in
Afghanistan and in peacekeeping operations in which we
cooperate help keep their increasingly limited military
forces trained and ready. Without us, the defense force
would be almost totally reliant on Australia, and that
country makes no secret of its views that New Zealand is
shirking on defense. Labour's decision to sizably increase
defense spending was at least in part meant to demonstrate
that they intend to meet their obligations to us and other
partners.
¶5. (S) New Zealand also gains access to U.S. intelligence
concerning any country in which it has troops. As noted in
our "Two Worlds" cable, Prime Minister Clark continues to
guard this information jealously, the surest sign of its
value to her. The Greens have gone on record this campaign
as being opposed to our intelligence cooperation. But by
declaring they will automatically join Labour in a coalition,
they have lost their negotiating leverage to determine a role
in Government should Labour win. Clark will ensure that the
Greens are kept well away from foreign affairs, defense, and
intelligence matters should the Labour-Green coalition form
the government.
¶6. (C) Ambassador Swindells observed in his July 4 speech
that U.S. and New Zealand are drifting apart and that the
"status quo" of our relationship is meaningless in a changing
world. The Government was initially furious at his message,
but it also clearly touched a nerve, especially after a
surprising percentage of the public is still responding
positively to the speech months later. FM Goff, in his final
meeting with Ambassador Swindells (ref D) for the first time
did not rule out discussion of the anti-nuclear issue in a
comprehensive dialogue. He also told journalists waiting
outside the meeting room that the Government could support a
broad exchange with the United States: the first time a
Labour Government official had said this publicly. We have
noticed how, even in the midst of their anti-American
campaign rhetoric, senior Labour officials have checked in
with us to make sure we were not taking the language too
seriously. On the campaign trail, they also now talk of the
importance of maintaining New Zealand's anti-nuclear policy,
rather than using the word "legislation."
¶7. (C) This is of course not to say that Labour would be
willing to change either the anti-nuclear legislation or the
policy. Nor that the Greens won't affect the contour of our
dialogue in any way, or slow things down at times. But it
does seem that for the first time the Government appears to
want to keep the window open for a frank discussion of all
issues, including the ban and its implications for us in the
region. At a minimum, such a discussion would allow both
sides to explore other ways to work through some of the
problems that Labour's policies cause for us. Labour MPs on
the Foreign Affairs Select Committee and senior bureaucrats
in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade have also
responded positively, albeit quietly, to our calls for a
dialogue, and have said they wish to discuss things farther
after elections.
--------------------------------------
National: The Spirit is Willing, but...
--------------------------------------
¶7. (C) With National, the desire for good relations is
there, but the impediments to seeing things through are
possibly greater than for Labour. Well before the election
campaign kicked off, National's Foreign Affairs spokesman
Lockwood Smith and other senior National leaders told us that
it would be very difficult for National to convince New
Zealanders to consider amending the county's nuclear ban,
even though National believes that the propulsion ban should
go. During the campaign, Labour's claims that under Brash
the nuclear policy would be "gone by lunchtime" have caused
problems for National and proved Smith correct. Brash was
forced to say -- repeatedly -- that a National Government
would only change the policy following a referendum or having
been elected on a platform of making the change. Neither
possibility is in the offing, and National clearly could not
do anything on this issue in the near term. There is no
"Nixon goes to China" possibility for Brash to talk with us
openly about the ban's implications, the way there in theory
is for Clark, one of the legislation's authors.
¶8. (C) In fact, National's entire foreign policy has come
under scrutiny this election, and Labour has succeeded in
raising concerns in the minds of the electorate that National
has a "secret agenda" to once again make New Zealand what FM
Goff calls "a junior sheriff" to the United States and
others. Many National officials are committed to New
Zealand's multilateralist policies even as they wish for
closer relations with the United States. Because of this,
and because National is now vulnerable on all foreign policy
issues, the party's recently released foreign policy is very
conservative -- with a small "c." Indeed, it's hard to
differentiate it from Labour's current policies, a fact
trumpeted by the Government as proof of National's perfidy.
The policy paper signals to us just how hard it would be for
a National Government to engage in a high-profile dialogue
with the United States, at least over the shorter term.
Similarly, National's defense policy only commits to keeping
Labour's current plans and reviewing the country's overall
military needs. The Nats recognize that New Zealand's
defense forces have been drawn down so much over the past
decade that the Ministry of Defence will be unable, over the
shorter term, to absorb more that the extra NZD 4.3 billion
that Labour has already allocated for recruitment and
retention.
¶9. (C) The real difference between working with a National
Government and Labour would be the issue of trust. Even if
National could not change the nation's policies or openly
admit to talking about the nuclear ban and other security
issues with us, we very likely could quietly work on a "road
map" of sorts to try and align our policies more closely.
Over time, we could then build on that process to work
through many of the issues that divide our countries.
----------------------
The Role of Parliament
----------------------
¶10. (C) No matter who wins Saturday's election, we will need
to work with both the Government and opposition if we decide
to pursue a comprehensive dialogue with New Zealand. We have
already had several preparatory discussions with senior
Foreign Affairs and Defense officials, as well as key MPs, to
prepare for a dialogue should Washington decide to move
forward. A Labour government could probably count on an
opposition National to support such an initiative, but
engaging National would still be key to helping keep Labour
on track. Conversely, a National Government would be far
less likely to be able to count on an opposition Labour
party's support, as Labour's goals for closer relations with
us would be mooted outside Government. Nevertheless, Labour
foreign policy stalwarts are generally well disposed to us
and would likely respond to direct outreach on our part. We
will need to help all parties work around the likely
skepticism of their constituents, many of whom have
knee-jerk anti-American views. This includes maintaining the
Embassy's active public relations campaign to raise the case
for better U.S.-New Zealand relations. We've had surprising
success with this over the past years, but we need to keep up
the fight.
Burnett