

Currently released so far... 12648 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AEMR
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AMCHAMS
AGMT
AADP
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BX
BT
BP
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CR
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CODEL
COPUOS
CIA
CFED
CARSON
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CN
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
EPET
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
ENIV
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ENNP
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXIM
ERNG
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IO
IT
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
IDP
ICTR
IEFIN
IRC
ITRA
ITALY
INRB
INTELSAT
IBET
IRAQI
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KIRF
KSEO
KVPR
KSEP
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KRIM
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KMFO
KMOC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KREC
KX
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTRE
MASC
MG
MARAD
MRCRE
MW
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NATIONAL
NGO
NR
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OECD
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PCI
PG
POGOV
PHUMPGOV
PEL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PMIL
POV
PRL
PDOV
PTBS
PRAM
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
ROOD
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SG
SPCE
SK
STEINBERG
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SEN
SANC
SWE
SHI
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
THPY
TP
TBID
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UY
UNCHR
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNMIK
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
USUN
USNC
UNIDROIT
UNO
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07WELLINGTON158, YEAR 2007 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - NEW ZEALAND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07WELLINGTON158.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07WELLINGTON158 | 2007-02-21 05:37 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO2693
RR RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0158/01 0520537
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 210537Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3902
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1187
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 4746
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 0115
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000158
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR EB/IPE - JENNIFER BOGER and EAP/ANP - DAN RICCI
STATE PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR JENNIFER CHOE GROVES
STATE PLEASE PASS TO USPTO
COMMERCE FOR CASSIE PETERS ITA/MAC/OIPR
E.O. 12985: N/A
TAGS: KIPR ETRD ECON PREL NZ
SUBJECT: YEAR 2007 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - NEW ZEALAND
REF: A. STATE 07944
¶B. WELLINGTON 138
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Post recommends that New Zealand (GNZ) not/not be
placed on the Special 301 List in 2007. The country's overall
commitment to the protection of intellectual property (IPR) is
relatively high as compared to most countries cited in the Special
301 review. The government continues to move ahead in updating its
intellectual property laws in compliance with international
standards, with major revisions to the Patents Bill and the
Copyright Amendments Bill ("New Technologies and Performers' Rights
Bill") expected to be finalized in 2007. Moreover, New Zealand
generally provides adequate and effective protection of intellectual
property rights under current legislation. Post remains in contact
with local IP industry representatives and the Ministry of Economic
Development to help ensure that the pending legislation reflect
industry's concerns and are passed as scheduled. Placing New
Zealand on the Special 301 list at this stage could backfire, as the
GNZ will see it as punishment even though NZ is doing the right
thing. End summary.
IPR Overview
-------------
¶2. (U) Post remains engaged in an ongoing dialogue with both IP
industry representatives and government agencies to help improve IPR
laws and strengthen GNZ's commitment to enforcement. The proposed
amendments to the Copyright Act 1994 now before a Parliamentary
Committee are intended to ensure that the act reflects current
developments in digital technologies and international developments
in copyright law. Post has made the GNZ aware
of industry's concern that portions of the new law dealing with the
treatment of Technological Protection Measures (TPM); exception for
incidental copying; ISP liability limitation; library digital
dissemination; time shifting; and computer program exceptions will
need to better address international minimum standards. Regarding
patent protection, the GNZ released a draft Patents Bill in 2005
which is expected to be given its first reading in the early part of
¶2007. While this revision to the patent regime is expected to bring
NZ's level of protection up to international standards, Post has
seconded industry's recommendation that the current bill should
include provision for patent term restoration that are in keeping
with international best practices. These developments, though
notwithstanding the need for technical adjustments, are a positive
indication that the GNZ is committed to moving forward on enhancing
the level of intellectual property protection. The following
comments are keyed to topics in ref. A.
PhRMA's PWL recommendation
--------------------------
¶3. (SBU) While the pharmaceutical industry urges that New Zealand be
placed on the priority watch list (PWL), post continues to believe
that the industry's restricted access to New Zealand's market stems
primarily from the cost containment strategies for subsidized drugs.
The government affiliated Pharmaceutical Management Agency
(PHARMAC) is mandated to spend less than its budget allows, and the
pharmaceutical industry has a number of legitimate complaints about
its treatment in the purchasing process. However, these industry
concerns are not IPR problems. While Post will continue to work to
improve access for US pharmaceuticals in New Zealand, we believe
this should be dealt with as a market-access barrier and not as a
failure to protect intellectual property. Even the pharmaceutical
industry trade association here, Researched Medicines Industry
Association of New Zealand (RMI - affiliated with PhRMA), assesses
that the government's practices do not violate its TRIPS
commitments.
¶4. (SBU) The national medicines policy is currently under review by
the Ministry of Health, and a parliamentary notice and comment
period will take place through the first quarter of 2007. If
successful, changes to the national medicines purchasing strategy
would be implemented in early 2008. This process would fulfill a
promise to the Labor government's coalition partner, the United
Future Party, to improve NZ public access to medicines; to extend
the use of quality medicines; and to use medicines more rationally.
There is currently a well publicized public debate, for example,
about access to Herceptin for the treatment of breast cancer. This
debate continues to bring pressure on PHARMAC to review/improve its
funding policies in order to allow wider access to innovative
medicines. This pressure is not likely to subside over the coming
year as a number of patients have already filed law suites
WELLINGTON 00000158 002 OF 003
challenging PHARMAC's policies. Meanwhile, the press continues to
give the matter extensive coverage.
¶5. (SBU) While the level of IP protection for pharmaceuticals is
adequate, Post agrees that it is in New Zealand's and our best
interests to complete work on the draft Patents Bill this year in
order to ensure that New Zealand's patent regime reflects enhanced
standards in international patent protection. We believe the better
course of action is to continue to work/consult with the GNZ to
ensure industry's concerns are reflected in pending legislation.
Designation of PWL at this time with the threat of possible trade
sanctions may not yield the changes the pharmaceutical industry
seeks but may embolden the government to claim its current policies
are protecting the population against an avaricious pharmaceutical
industry. It is equally difficult to make the case for an IP
violation when PhRMA has not been able to estimate the amount of
damages for 2006 attributable to a lack of IPR or restricted market
access.
IIPA's Special Mention of New Zealand's IP Regime
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶6. (U) As IIPA noted in its submission, New Zealand's government in
December 2006 unveiled the long-anticipated Copyright (New
Technologies and Performer's Rights) Amendment Bill. This extensive
amendment to New Zealand's copyright law contains many valuable
improvements but some provisions remain problematic for industry.
Post agrees with IIPA's recommendation that a more effective course
of action would be to continue to engage the government in order to
ensure that the draft legislation provides more useful tools for
dealing with piracy. Post has already presented the list of noted
shortfalls in the draft legislation to the Ministry of Economic
Development, the agency primarily responsible for drafting
legislation and monitoring IP enforcement. Post has engaged Bronwyn
Turley, Senior Policy Advisor to the GNZ for intellectual property
issues to begin a dialogue to address the needed technical
corrections.
Prior Years' Special 301 Issues
-------------------------------
¶7. (U) Ref B is the formal response by the government of New Zealand
to issues raised in prior years' Special 301 submissions by
industry. As noted previously, New Zealand law continues to allow
parallel importation in certain defined circumstances. In 2003, a
partial ban on parallel importation of films (including VHS, VCD and
DVDs) was introduced. The Copyright (Parallel Importation of Films
and Onus of Proof) Amendment Act amended provisions of the Copyright
Act relating to infringement by importation. The ban bars parallel
import of any film within nine months of it first being made
available to the public, whether in New Zealand or elsewhere. The
only exceptions are parallel imports of films for the importer's
private and domestic use. The partial ban contains a five year
sunset clause and will be reviewed again in 2008.
¶8. (U) In conversations with local film industry representatives
W.J. Hood of Film and Video Labeling Body (FVLB) and Tony Eaton of
New Zealand Federation Against Copyright Theft (NZFACT - affiliated
with MPAA), Post Econoff learned that industry and government
Ministers whose portfolios deal with copyright issues are discussing
ways to further strengthen New Zealand's IPR enforcement. Both
Judith Tizard, Assoc. Minister of Commerce and Trevor Mallard,
Minister of Economic Development are positively inclined to extent
the partial ban beyond 2008. According to industry, an increasing
number of GNZ Ministers are now aware of the positive benefits of a
strong IP regime for both New Zealand's economic development and
increased tax revenues, especially as New Zealand's domestic film
industry plays a more pronounced role on the international stage.
¶9. (U) Post is unaware of any new legislation related specifically
to domestic protection of traditional knowledge or expressions of
folklore. However, the proposed changes to the Patents Act 1953
include a provision to set up a Maori consultative committee that
would advise the patents commissioner on whether a patent
application pertains to an invention that is derived from Maori
traditional knowledge, indigenous plants or animals, and whether the
commercial exploitation of such an invention would be contrary to
Maori values. New Zealand continues to express a right to avail
itself of the various exclusions and exceptions contained in the
TRIPS Agreement.
Enforcement
-----------
WELLINGTON 00000158 003 OF 003
¶10. (U) The New Zealand government says it is committed to enforcing
its IPR-related laws adequately and effectively, and created new
criminal offenses for trademark infringements and increased
penalties for copyright infringements under the Trade Marks Act
2002, which entered into force in August 2003. In most instances,
the government responds to complaints raised by rights holders
rather than initiating action against IP infringers. Those
complaints have been relatively few, and so the government does not
track enforcement-related statistics, such as civil and criminal
penalties. The government lacks a central body to coordinate the
sharing of information on illegal IP activities and enforcement
efforts. There is an effort underway to set-up a new office within
New Zealand Customs by mid 2007 that will be exclusively dedicated
to IP enforcement issues. We are not aware of any industry
complaints related to Trade Mark enforcement in New Zealand.
¶11. (U) Currently, New Zealand Customs can confiscate and destroy
pirated products if the holder of the trademark or copyright has
requested that Customs detain the goods. That request is valid for
five years and can be renewed. Customs does not have the power to
prosecute, but rights holders can pursue relief through civil
lawsuits and have 10 working days to do so after the goods are
detained. Otherwise, the goods are released or, at the importer's
request, destroyed. The provisions apply only to trademarks and
copyright registered in New Zealand. Customs has no authority to
detain infringing IP goods from being exported. Almost all the
infringing goods imported into New Zealand originated in Asia,
particularly China, and most of the intercepted and investigated
goods were clothing, footwear and headwear. The number of pirated
CDs and DVDs intercepted by Customs has declined sharply, after
peaking in early 2005. While it appears that CDs and DVDs are
increasingly being copied to order within New Zealand, making
detection of local production increasingly difficult, industry has
an ongoing cooperative dialogue with local authorities to better
police IPR as new forms of piracy are detected. The New Zealand
Department of Internal Affairs has had some success, however, in
stemming domestic sales of pirated and counterfeit products by
closing down e-auction sites.
Conclusion
----------
¶12. (U) Post maintains that, despite certain technical deficiencies
in the pending revisions to the intellectual property laws now
before Parliament, there remains a strong commitment on the part of
the GNZ to continue to improve its IPR regime and bring it into
conformance with international standards. GNZ's enforcement of
current IP laws also reflects the government's proactive stance as
they learn and adapt to help stem new forms of piracy. While there
is additional work to be done to strengthen the law and enhance
enforcement, Post recommends the better course of action is to
engage the GNZ and monitor the progress of IP legislation rather
than place New Zealand on this year's watch list.
McComick