

Currently released so far... 12648 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AEMR
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AMCHAMS
AGMT
AADP
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BX
BT
BP
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CR
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CODEL
COPUOS
CIA
CFED
CARSON
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CN
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
EPET
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
ENIV
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ENNP
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXIM
ERNG
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IO
IT
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
IDP
ICTR
IEFIN
IRC
ITRA
ITALY
INRB
INTELSAT
IBET
IRAQI
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KIRF
KSEO
KVPR
KSEP
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KRIM
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KMFO
KMOC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KREC
KX
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTRE
MASC
MG
MARAD
MRCRE
MW
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NATIONAL
NGO
NR
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OECD
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PCI
PG
POGOV
PHUMPGOV
PEL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PMIL
POV
PRL
PDOV
PTBS
PRAM
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
ROOD
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SG
SPCE
SK
STEINBERG
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SEN
SANC
SWE
SHI
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
THPY
TP
TBID
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UY
UNCHR
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNMIK
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
USUN
USNC
UNIDROIT
UNO
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09OTTAWA581, Canada's Foreign Investment Reforms Create A More Open
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09OTTAWA581.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09OTTAWA581 | 2009-07-27 19:08 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO7520
PP RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHMT RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0581/01 2081908
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 271908Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9705
INFO RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 2007
RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000581
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR E, EB/DCT, WHA/EX, WHA/CAN
STATE PASS USTR (SULLIVAN)
COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC (WORD AND BARRAGAN)
TREASURY FOR IA (NEPHEW)
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EFIN ETRD EINV EIND PREL CA
SUBJECT: Canada's Foreign Investment Reforms Create A More Open
Market But Do Not Spare U.S. Steel from Canadian Court Action
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Canada's July 17 federal court action against U.S.
Steel attempts to force the company to meet the production and
employment commitments it made to the Federal Government in 2007 in
exchange for permission to take over Canada's Stelco. At that time,
the GOC exercised its legal right make foreign acquisition of
Canadian assets conditional on the fulfillment of certain
performance requirements. However, at the same time as the Federal
Industry Ministry is cracking down on investor behavior, the
Conservative government is also implementing changes to the national
investment regime that would make Canada a more open and transparent
investment destination for foreign investors. Although most of the
proposed regulations are not controversial, some foreign investors
will be dismayed that Canada's new security requirements demand
increased disclosure of confidential information and increase the
possibility that the government might disallow an investment on
security grounds even after the transaction has been completed. End
summary.
U.S. Steel
----------
¶2. (U) On July 17, Minister of Industry Tony Clement announced that
the Government of Canada was launching an action against U.S. Steel
in the Superior Court of Canada to remedy an alleged breach of
Canadian investment law. The American steelmaker's 2007 acquisition
of Ontario-based Stelco was predicated upon the company maintaining
minimum levels of Canadian employment, capital expenditures and
production. In May 2009, the industry minister threatened legal
action after U.S. Steel cut production and laid off employees at its
Canadian operations in tandem with the global economic recession.
ICA Undertakings
----------------
¶3. (U) Canada's Investment Canada Act (ICA) permits the Industry
Minister to bind foreign investors to obligations on matters such as
local production and employment levels in order to ensure that the
investment provides a 'net benefit' to Canada. Following a recent
exchange of letters with the company, Clement stated, "I remain of
the view that U.S. Steel is not complying with its undertakings, and
I am not satisfied by its explanations for non-compliance." If the
Canadian court finds that an investor has breached an ICA
undertaking, remedies include curing the breach, fines or forced
divestiture of the investment. In this case, the Industry Minister
has asked the courts to levy a C$10,000-a-day fine against U.S.
Steel, retroactive to the November 2008 Canadian layoffs.
¶4. (SBU) Although the terms of the undertakings a company makes to
the government are generally confidential, the Canadian media is
reporting that when U.S. Steel bought the bankrupt Stelco in 2007
for C$1.16 billion, it promised to boost production at Stelco mills
by 10 per cent in each of the first three years of ownership and to
maintain 3,105 full-time employees. Today, some 2,400 workers have
either retired or been laid off by U.S. Steel, and the company has
halted steel output in Hamilton and Nanticoke, Ont. In its court
filing, the government alleges that the company has defaulted on 77
percent of its employment commitment. (Comment: Since U.S. Steel
Qpercent of its employment commitment. (Comment: Since U.S. Steel
has not responded publically to the GOC court action it is not known
whether the company's undertakings included any exemptions for
exogenous economic downturns. End comment.) This is the first time
the Canadian government has taken a foreign company to court over
promises made as part of an acquisition (although it has threatened
similar action against the Brazilian mining company Vale Inco which
has laid off approximately 400 workers).
¶5. (SBU) Some Canadians are criticizing the government's move for
the negative message it will send to other potential foreign
investors. A Globe and Mail editorial argues that although Ottawa
may be legally entitled to its actions, Stelco's 2007 commitments
are unreasonable in today's volatile economic climate. The paper
speculates that Canada's hard line against Stelco may be intended as
a warning to General Motors and Chrysler that they will be similarly
held to the employment commitments they made in exchange for federal
OTTAWA 00000581 002 OF 003
bailout funds. Nevertheless, the Globe concludes, "Ottawa should
refrain from intervening in future foreign takeovers. In a world
where economic volatility can render hard-won promises
impracticable, it simply isn't worth it."
¶6. (SBU) Christopher Sands, a senior fellow at Washington's Hudson
Institute, notes that the Canadian action puts U.S. Steel in the
difficult position of having to sideline one government's policy in
order to comply with another's. The steel industry has been hit
hard by the slump in construction and one of U.S. Steel's best
customers is the U.S. government, which has imposed strict Buy
American rules. This means that U.S. Steel has a stronger incentive
than usual to cut Canadian production to maintain higher volumes at
U.S. mills. Consequently, Sands suggests, the future decisions of
U.S Steel "will be determined by which government they fear more."
Changes to ICA
--------------
¶7. (U) In spite of the actions regarding Stelco, the Harper
Government is moving forward with commitments to open up the
Canadian economy to more foreign investment. In March 2009
preliminary changes to the Investment Canada Act (ICA) were
introduced as part of the government's budget legislation. These
were followed on July 11, 2009 with a number of proposed regulations
to give effect to the investment changes contained in the budget.
Among the most important amendments are increased investment
thresholds -- to determine which foreign investments will be subject
to a full governmental review -- and the imposition of a new
national security screening mechanism. Canada also plans to
eliminate differential review thresholds for transportation and
financial services and uranium production. The proposed regulations
will take effect after a 30-day comment period and do not require a
vote in the House of Commons.
Higher thresholds, new formulas, same cultural barriers
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶8. (SBU) The ICA requires that direct foreign takeovers of large
Canadian companies be reviewed and approved based on whether or not
the investment constitutes a "net benefit to Canada." (Comment:
The net benefit criteria are not spelled out in legal terms and are
open to a range of interpretations depending on the disposition of
the government in power. End comment.) Frequently, the government
will ask the foreign investor to provide negotiated undertakings
such as those assumed by U.S. Steel. Under the old rules, an ICA
review is required for any direct takeover by foreign investors from
a WTO country of a Canadian company with more than C$312 million in
gross assets. The new regulations will increase the review
threshold, first to C$600 million and ultimately to C$1 billion by
the end of four years.
¶9. (SBU) Although the higher thresholds mean fewer foreign
investments will likely be subject to full review, all foreign
investments must be notified to the government. Also the
methodology for determining the review threshold will be expanded
from considering only the asset value of the proposed acquisition to
a broader evaluation based on a company's market capitalization,
assets, and liabilities. Despite the new regulations, Canada's
Qassets, and liabilities. Despite the new regulations, Canada's
pre-existing regime banning virtually all foreign investment in
cultural industries remains unchanged, even though the 2008
government report Compete to Win recommended reforms in this area.
Enhanced national security requirements
---------------------------------------
¶10. (U) Under the proposed regulations, a foreign investor will have
to disclose the names of directors, the five highest paid officers,
any person or entity holding more than ten percent of the investor's
equity or voting rights, and the name of any foreign state that
holds a direct or indirect ownership interest in the investor, even
minor shareholders. The security disclosure requirements apply to
all foreign investments (including acquisitions and the
establishment of new businesses), even those that fall below the
OTTAWA 00000581 003 OF 003
review threshold.
¶11. (SBU) The new regulations set out time frames for the government
to invoke the national security screening process - generally within
45 days after a notice of investment or review application has been
filed. However, in cases of investments valued below the applicable
review threshold, the government has up to 45 days after an
investment has been implemented to determine whether it should be
submitted to a full security screening. (Comment: Presumably, this
longer period exists to prevent smaller acquisitions that are not
subject to other forms of review from slipping under the radar and
to provide adequate time for the government to obtain more
information about the proposed investment and investor. End
comment.)
¶12. (U) The security review could take as long as four months and
will be conducted primarily by Canada's security and intelligence
agencies. If an investment is found to be a threat to national
security then the investment can be unwound or restricted.
Implications of Canadian changes for US investors
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶13. (SBU) Although the subjective net benefits test has not been
eliminated from Canada's foreign investment review process, the
higher review threshold means that fewer investments will be
subjected to it. As well, the addition of a more transparent
process to ensure that investments are not injurious to national
security brings Canada's policy more closely into alignment with
that of the United States. The clarification of Canada's security
requirements comes too late to affect the failed 2008 attempt by
US-based Alliant Techsystems, Inc. to take over the space-assets arm
of Canada's MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates Ltd (MDA), which
Ottawa vetoed on national security grounds. However during a
meeting with Embassy officials last week, a senior Industry Canada
official speculated that if the new security framework had been in
place at the time of Alliant's bid, the outcome could have been
quite different.