

Currently released so far... 12648 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AEMR
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AMCHAMS
AGMT
AADP
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BX
BT
BP
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CR
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CODEL
COPUOS
CIA
CFED
CARSON
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CN
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
EPET
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
ENIV
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ENNP
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXIM
ERNG
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IO
IT
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
IDP
ICTR
IEFIN
IRC
ITRA
ITALY
INRB
INTELSAT
IBET
IRAQI
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KIRF
KSEO
KVPR
KSEP
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KRIM
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KMFO
KMOC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KREC
KX
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTRE
MASC
MG
MARAD
MRCRE
MW
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NATIONAL
NGO
NR
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OECD
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PCI
PG
POGOV
PHUMPGOV
PEL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PMIL
POV
PRL
PDOV
PTBS
PRAM
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
ROOD
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SG
SPCE
SK
STEINBERG
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SEN
SANC
SWE
SHI
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
THPY
TP
TBID
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UY
UNCHR
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNMIK
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
USUN
USNC
UNIDROIT
UNO
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08OTTAWA1032, CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS STIR DEBATE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08OTTAWA1032.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08OTTAWA1032 | 2008-08-01 18:00 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO1777
PP RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHMT RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #1032/01 2141800
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 011800Z AUG 08
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8278
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 001032
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV CA
SUBJECT: CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS STIR DEBATE
¶1. (SBU) Summary. Federal and provincial Canadian Human
Rights Commissions and Tribunals have over recent years come
under intensified criticism, largely due to high-profile hate
speech complaints, including about a controversial article on
Muslims in Maclean's, a prominent Canadian magazine. An
all-Mission Canada reporting officers' DVC on July 28
compared perceptions about and performance of the federal
commission and the provincial equivalents, discovering a
common track record of generally solid performance in support
of human rights and against discrimination, despite some
problems. This cable will examine the federal commission and
its framework, while septel will provide insights into the
workings of the provincial bodies. End summary.
¶2. (U) The federal Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC)
administers the Canadian Human Rights Act and is responsible
for enforcing the federal Employment Equity Act. It has
jurisdiction over all federally regulated employers,
including federal departments and agencies, airlines,
television and radio stations, and the Internet. The
Employment Equity Act covers more than a million federally
regulated employees. The CHRC's work focuses on three main
areas: resolving discrimination disputes; working with
employers to prevent discrimination; and, educating
stakeholders about human rights.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
------------------
¶3. (SBU) The CHRC serves as a screening body for the Canadian
Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT). Chief Commissioner Jennifer
Lynch confirmed to PolMinCouns on July 21 that the CHRC
attempts to resolve as many disputes as possible by
mediation, and only ends up referring a small percentage of
complaints to the CHRT for judgment. Annually, the CHRC
receives about 15,000 inquiries, of which only approximately
700 turn into complaints and 80 go to the CHRT.
Disability-related disputes invariably make up the largest
proportion of complaints. In 2007, 36 pct of complaints
dealt with disabilities, 13 pct with gender, 12 pct with
national or ethnic origin, 12 pct with age, and the remaining
27 pct with a variety of other grounds for discrimination.
¶4. (SBU) The CHRC's first step after receiving an inquiry is
to determine whether the allegations fall within its
jurisdiction as established by the Canadian Human Rights Act.
If the case is within its jurisdiction, CHRC officials seek
"Early Resolution" through an on-the-record series of
facilitated telephone conversations. If this process is
unsuccessful, or if a telephone discussion is impractical,
the case goes to "Preventive Mediation," which involves
face-to-face conversations aimed at establishing a mutually
acceptable resolution. If CHRC officials exhaust these
options, the claimant can file a formal complaint, which goes
to the CHRC's Investigations Division. Following an
investigation, Commissioners can dismiss the complaint,
appoint a conciliator, or refer the matter to the CHRT. The
CHRT can impose penalties up to C$20,000 (US$19,499), or
order other forms of non-financial redress. Respondents may
appeal CHRT decisions to the Federal Court of Canada for
review. Ultimately, a case could proceed to the Supreme
Court of Canada, although such appeals are rare.
¶5. (SBU) According to its own statistics, the CHRC resolves
eighty percent of cases via some type of mediation or
settlement instead of referral to the CHRT. Since Chief
Commissioner Lynch's appointment in 2007, the CHRC has placed
an extra emphasis on early resolution in order to clear up
long-standing backlogs and to resolve cases more quickly.
Qlong-standing backlogs and to resolve cases more quickly.
This approach has the added benefit of cost savings; cases
resolved at the mediation stage cost taxpayers an average of
C$4,000 (US$3,905), while cases that go to CHRT cost as much
as C$40,000 (US$39,055), not including the parties' personal
or legal expenses. The CHRC sends its own counsels to
approximately 50 pct of cases at the CHRT. Commission
officials explained that the CHRC had discontinued its
previous practice of representation at all CHRT cases due in
part to limited resources but also to avoid giving the
impression that it represents the complainants. When a CHRC
counsel is present, it is as the representative of the
"public interest," rather than of a specific party.
According to Commission officials, the "public interest" is
not necessarily the same as a claimant's interest, but these
interests overlap in the majority of cases. Parties may
separately choose to retain counsel, but are under no
obligation to do so, and must pay all legal fees themselves.
PREVENTION AND EDUCATION
------------------------
¶6. (SBU) The CHRC devotes considerable resources on
pro-active initiatives to prevent discrimination and to
OTTAWA 00001032 002 OF 003
educate stakeholders on human rights. The CHRC has
established Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) with a number
of employers of federal jurisdiction, including the Canadian
Border Services Agency, the Canadian Forces, Canada Post, and
WestJet Airlines. After establishing an MOU with the CHRC,
employers become part of an Employer Advisory Council, which
meets quarterly to discuss ways to prevent discrimination in
the workplace. The CHRC also directs a variety of other
prevention programs, including an annual Discrimination
Prevention Forum and an Employment Equity Compliance Program.
¶7. (SBU) Separately, the CHRC conducts research and publishes
studies to develop stakeholders' and public knowledge of
human rights. In 2007, the CHRC published a guide to help
employers properly manage concerns of employees who have
returned to the work-force after prolonged absences due to
disability or illness. The Commission also released two
reports on the legal and medical aspects of environmental
sensitivities, including guidelines for accommodation of
these sensitivities. The CHRC is also active in
international human rights fora, and Chief Commissioner Lynch
is simultaneously Chair of the International Coordinating
Committee of National Human Rights Institutes. Chief
Commissioner Lynch told PolMinCouns that she regretted the
absence of a U.S. representative on the ICC and would welcome
some U.S. participation.
HATE SPEECH
-----------
¶8. (SBU) The debate over hate speech and acceptable limits of
free speech and expression has been ongoing in Canada since
1977, when Parliament enacted the Canadian Human Rights Act,
which includes a specific hate speech provision. Section 13
of the Act prohibits the repeated telephonic communication
of any matter "likely to expose a person or persons to hatred
or contempt." The 2001 Anti-Terrorism Act clarified that
Section 13 applies to the Internet, giving the CHRC specific
jurisdiction over hate speech on the Internet. In 2007, the
CHRC received 16 complaints alleging a breach of Section 13,
representing approximately 2 pct of all complaints. Since
2001, the CHRC has rendered 14 decisions on Section 13
complaints, 13 of which were against the respondent.
¶9. (SBU) Critics of the CHRC have argued that it is
interpreting its mandate too broadly, leading to undue
restrictions on the freedoms of speech and expression. Some
have claimed that CHRC and the CHRT processes can result in
innocent respondents incurring substantial costs to defend
themselves. In response, Liberal MP Keith Martin has put
forward a private member's motion in the House of Commons to
repeal Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, while
Conservative MP Rick Dykstra has introduced a motion calling
for the House of Commons' Justice and Human Rights Committee
to re-examine the mandate of the CHRC and how it interprets
Section 13. Neither has come to a vote.
¶10. (SBU) The CHRC's best known hate speech case was a 2006
complaint filed by the Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC) and a
group of Muslim law students against Maclean's magazine
regarding the publication of a selection of articles and book
excerpts by author Mark Steyn. The group separately filed
concurrent complaints with provincial human rights
commissions/tribunals in Ontario and British Columbia,
alleging that the magazine had violated human rights by
publishing anti-Islamic articles and refusing to publish the
CIC's rebuttal. In June 2008, the CHRC declined to proceed
with the complaint, concluding that, while the articles were
"obviously calculated to excite discussion and even offend
Q"obviously calculated to excite discussion and even offend
certain readers," the views were "not of an extreme nature,
as defined by the Supreme Court." The Ontario Human Rights
Commission also dismissed the case, arguing it fell outside
its jurisdiction. The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal
held hearings that closed in June 2008; a ruling is still
pending. (Note: Septel on provincial human rights
commissions will examine in more depth. End note.)
¶11. (SBU) According to Chief Commissioner Lynch and other
CHRC officials, such criticisms are unjustified. They
pointed out that the CHRC is legally required to accept and
process all complaints that fall under its jurisdiction, and
officials carefully adhere to the Canadian Supreme Court
ruling that determined what constitutes "hate speech." The
Chief Commissioner emphasized that Canadian law clearly
differs from U.S. law, in that, while the First Amendment of
the U.S. Constitution provides for open-ended freedom of
expression, Canadian legislators and courts have attempted to
"strike a balance" between protecting freedom of expression
and outlawing hate speech. Specifically, the Canadian
Supreme Court ruled that Section 13 does infringe on freedom
of expression, but that this infringement is justified under
Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,
OTTAWA 00001032 003 OF 003
which provides that the Charter is subject to "such
reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably
justified in a free and democratic society."
¶12. (SBU) CHRC officials privately acknowledged the political
sensitivity of the hate speech issue, but asserted that the
Maclean's magazine case was "unique," that Parliament never
intended Section 13 issues to apply to mainstream media, and
that, with the dismissal of the case, the CHRC's focus would
shift back to the worst examples of hate speech. They
insisted that the CHRC is on the "right side" of the debate
with respect to finding an appropriate balance between free
speech and expression and prohibiting heinous speech that
promotes hatred and contempt. However, in June 2008, the
CHRC launched a comprehensive policy review of how best to
address hate messages on the Internet, with a report due in
fall 2008.
¶13. (SBU) Comment: Most of the CHRC's real work goes on
under the public radar, although the tens of thousands of
inquiries in recent years are a clear indication that
Canadians are indeed sensitive to possible violations of
their human or equal rights and are seeking remedies to
perceived discrimination -- most of which the CHRC appears to
have been able successfully to resolve. Its education and
foreign assistance activities also appear laudable and
useful. Despite the CHRC's ultimate dismissal of the
Maclean's case, the hate crime issue will likely continue to
consume considerable resources and divert energies away from
the CHRC's more mainstream programs and foci, while the
problem of "forum shopping" -- as in the Maclean's case -- is
apt to grow, absent some clearer Parliamentary delineation of
jurisdictions between the federal and provincial levels and
among the provinces.
Visit Canada,s Economy and Environment Forum at
http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/can ada
WILKINS