

Currently released so far... 12648 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AEMR
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AMCHAMS
AGMT
AADP
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BX
BT
BP
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CR
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CODEL
COPUOS
CIA
CFED
CARSON
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CN
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
EPET
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
ENIV
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ENNP
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXIM
ERNG
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IO
IT
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
IDP
ICTR
IEFIN
IRC
ITRA
ITALY
INRB
INTELSAT
IBET
IRAQI
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KIRF
KSEO
KVPR
KSEP
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KRIM
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KMFO
KMOC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KREC
KX
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTRE
MASC
MG
MARAD
MRCRE
MW
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NATIONAL
NGO
NR
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OECD
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PCI
PG
POGOV
PHUMPGOV
PEL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PMIL
POV
PRL
PDOV
PTBS
PRAM
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
ROOD
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SG
SPCE
SK
STEINBERG
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SEN
SANC
SWE
SHI
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
THPY
TP
TBID
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UY
UNCHR
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNMIK
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
USUN
USNC
UNIDROIT
UNO
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 04OTTAWA3144, CANADIAN MINISTER OF TRANSPORT SUGGESTS THAT THE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04OTTAWA3144.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
04OTTAWA3144 | 2004-11-22 16:46 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 OTTAWA 003144
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/CAN - ALAN HOLST, EB/TRA - JOHN BYERLY
STATE PASS USTR FOR SAGE CHANDLER
TRANSPORTATION FOR OST (EDDIE CARAZO) AND INTERNATIONAL
AVIATION (SUSAN MCDERMOTT)
COMMERCE FOR 4320/MAC/WH/ON/OIA/WORD
FAA FOR LEEANN HART
TSA FOR SUSAN WILLIAMS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR ECIN EINV CA
SUBJECT: CANADIAN MINISTER OF TRANSPORT SUGGESTS THAT THE
STATUS QUO HAS GOT TO GO
REF: A) Ottawa 2893
B) Ottawa 2766
-------
Summary
-------
¶1. (SBU) Canadian Transport Minister Jean Lapierre has
signaled his interest in reviewing Canada's civil aviation
policy. He has proposed a broad examination of barriers to
a more innovative and efficient civair system in Canada,
including questioning foreign investment limits and cabotage
prohibitions. This is the first time that a Minister of
Transport has so enthusiastically questioned the status quo,
but not the first time that these questions have been
raised. Most recently, in autumn 2002, Canada's Independent
Transition Observer on Airline Restructuring called for the
Government of Canada (GOC) to vigorously pursue a program of
liberalization of the airline market-- unilaterally if
necessary. Those recommendations, and others like them from
2001, 1999 and earlier, all fell on deaf ears when David
Collenette was Minister of Transport (from June 1997 to
December 2003). The new Minister is clearly more amenable
to change, but this will depend on USG willingness to engage
on this issue as well as Canadian Cabinet interest in
dealing with a potentially divisive issue while in a
Minority government position. For its part, Air Canada, the
national flag carrier, has indicated that it is ready for a
more open bilateral aviation agreement with the United
States. End summary.
---------------------------------
The Minister Talks Liberalization
---------------------------------
¶2. (U) The federal government is mulling a dramatic
overhaul of the country's airline industry, including the
elimination of limits on foreign ownership in Canadian
airlines and even letting U.S. carriers fly passengers
between Canadian destinations. Jean Lapierre, the Transport
Minister since June 2004 (Tony Valeri was Minister from
December 2003 to June 2004), said in early October that he
would reopen the question of a more liberal aviation
agreement with the United States and initiate public debate
on the issue (reftel B). In late October Lapierre said that
Canada must open up its airline sector and force Air Canada
to survive on its own. In his comments to airline
executives on October 29 in Toronto Lapierre noted that:
"For nearly a quarter of a century, the federal government's
air policies have been built on protecting what we have,
rather than building something better, protecting against
loss of service, against the loss of our national flag
carrier." "The time for this approach is over," the
Minister stated.
¶3. (U) At the Toronto meeting Lapierre questioned whether
it is time to relax airline ownership restrictions, if it is
time for Canada to consider allowing foreign carriers to
provide domestic passenger service, and whether cargo
cabotage should now be allowed. Lapierre made similar
allusions to liberalization in discussions with Ambassador
Cellucci during their October 26 meeting (reftel A).
¶4. (U) Minister Lapierre said he intends to task the House
of Commons Standing Committee on Transport with addressing
these questions and, once he has their views, to "move
swiftly" toward implementation. Lapierre presented his
proposals to the Commons Transport Committee in early
November for its review and recommendations. In a speech
before the Air Transport Association of Canada in Vancouver
on November 15, Lapierre said that he would ask the
Transport Committee to consider not only a "fully open skies
agreement with the United States," but also an expanded,
integrated market that includes Mexico.
--------------------------------------------- --
The Issue Has Already Been Exhaustively Studied
--------------------------------------------- --
¶5. (U) This is not the first time that these questions have
been raised in Canada, although this is the first time that
the Minister of Transport has been so clearly enthusiastic
about possibly altering the status quo.
¶6. (U) In September 2002 Debra Ward, the "Independent
Transition Observer on Airline Restructuring," released her
final report with long- and short-term policy
recommendations on how to improve market competition in
Canada's airline industry. Ward's position was established
in August 2000 (by then-Minister David Collennette) in the
wake of the take-over of Canadian Airlines International by
Air Canada, and the consequent establishment of Air Canada's
monopoly position in the Canadian air travel market. Ward
had the mandate to examine the overall impact of airline
restructuring on the following: consumers; urban, rural and
remote communities; travel agents and airports; and airlines
and their employees. (FYI: Ward's 2002 report is available
online:
www.tc.gc.ca/pol/en/Air/Airline_Restructuring _menu_page.htm.
End FYI.)
¶7. (U) In addition to liberalization, Ward's
recommendations encompassed a wide array of subjects, such
as the need for a "Passenger Bill of Rights," provision of
air service to small and isolated communities, and travel
agency regulation. Liberalization was identified as a long-
term policy goal and four specific recommendations for
action were made:
¶A. "That the government make every effort to reach
reciprocal agreements, but be prepared to liberalize air
service without direct or immediate reciprocal benefits for
carriers, if there is an obvious advantage for Canadians and
consumers, and when the liberalization has either no impact
on the carrier industry, or when the carrier interests are
clearly subsumed by a greater benefit."
¶B. "That, within the context of a liberalization framework,
the Government of Canada liberalize the current rules of
ownership to allow foreign-ownership of domestic Canadian
carriers and a 49% ownership level of international
carriers."
¶C. "That the Government of Canada rigorously pursue and
accelerate a program of liberalization under the bilateral
regime."
¶D. "That the Government of Canada work to achieve
liberalized air agreements with key multinational partners
and plan towards the establishment of common aviation
areas."
(Comment: Ward identified the United States as the country
that Canada should target first for enhanced liberalization
negotiations. End comment.)
----------------------------------
Ward's Findings Echo Prior Reports
----------------------------------
¶8. (U) Over the past 12 years the Canadian Competition
Bureau has consistently advised the GOC to liberalize
domestic air transport, unilaterally if necessary, in order
to enhance competition. In the more recent past (since
1999), the Competition Bureau has recommended that the GOC
permit foreigners to hold up to 49 percent of voting shares
in Canadian air carriers.
¶9. (U) The Canadian Transportation Act Review Panel, in its
June 2001 report, also recommended that the limit on the
voting shares of Canadian airlines that can be held by
foreigners be raised to 49%. That panel recommended that
the government enter into negotiations with the United
States and Mexico to create a North American Common Aviation
Area in which carriers from Canada, the U.S., and Mexico
would compete freely. And, as a back-up option in the event
those negotiations did not succeed, the Panel recommended
that the government negotiate with other countries for the
granting of reciprocal modified sixth freedom rights and of
rights of establishment for foreign-owned domestic carriers.
¶10. (U) In addition, the House of Commons Standing
Committee on Transport recommended in late 1999 that the GOC
should raise the foreign ownership limit in Canada's
airlines from the current 25 percent to 49 per cent;
initiate negotiations with the United States on reciprocal
cabotage; and examine the viability of licensing foreign-
owned carriers to operate solely on Canadian domestic
routes.
------------------------
Will Liberalization Fly?
------------------------
¶11. (U) In 2002 then-Minister of Transport David Collenette
reacted to Ward's recommendation to open Canada's passenger
airline industry to foreign competition by noting the strong
counter-argument that has been applied previously; i.e.,
that unilateral opening of Canadian air markets would lead
to only the most passenger-intensive and lucrative routes
receiving extra attention, while low-load routes serving
smaller communities would be further marginalized.
Collenette also declared that homegrown Canadian competition
to Air Canada, such as Calgary-based WestJet, is
increasingly successful and would only be damaged by
unilateral liberalization. Furthermore, Collenette pointed
out that the United States had shown little enthusiasm for
further reciprocal liberalization, e.g., passenger cabotage.
¶12. (U) Air Canada has recently indicated that it would be
interested in liberalizing the aviation relationship.
Speaking to reporters November 15 in Toronto, Air Canada
Chief Executive Officer Robert Milton urged the USG and GOC
to "get on with" expanding the existing bilateral aviation
agreement, observing that he thinks that would be good for
Air Canada's business. Asked about reports that Minister
Lapierre appears to have become the champion of a more
liberal bilateral aviation policy, Milton was quoted as
saying that he is as happy with that news as Red Sox fans
were with the World Series.
¶13. (SBU) Embassy discussions in recent weeks with local
Air Canada officials and industry insiders confirm Air
Canada's interest in an enhanced aviation agreement,
particularly for cargo. There are reports that Air Canada
would like to switch its air cargo operation from one which
currently only carries cargo in the hold of passenger
flights, to a full-service, all-cargo branch. The carrier
has reportedly started making inquiries for the acquisition
of cargo freighters. Air Canada officials suggest that the
carrier's code share partner, United, would be supportive of
negotiations for a broader bilateral aviation agreement, but
we have not heard that directly from United.
¶14. (SBU) Comment: We expect that many of the familiar
protectionist arguments will be made against liberalization
as Parliament debates Minister Lapierre's proposals. There
are many objective advocates of liberalization, however,
such as Debra Ward, the Competition Bureau, and the
Transportation Act Review Panel, all arguing in favor of
opening up the aviation environment. Now there is a
Minister in place who seems to want to act on this body of
well-reasoned advice. He is clearly convening a
parliamentary group to examine the issue to smoke out in
advance any obstructionist views. We will be speaking with
Liberal, Conservative, Bloc Quebecois and NDP Members of
Parliament to determine what their thinking might be on
liberalization. Post would also appreciate learning the
views of the USG and U.S. aviation interests regarding
reciprocal liberalization with Canada. End comment.
Cellucci