

Currently released so far... 12648 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AEMR
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AMCHAMS
AGMT
AADP
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BX
BT
BP
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CR
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CODEL
COPUOS
CIA
CFED
CARSON
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CN
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
EPET
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
ENIV
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ENNP
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXIM
ERNG
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IO
IT
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
IDP
ICTR
IEFIN
IRC
ITRA
ITALY
INRB
INTELSAT
IBET
IRAQI
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KIRF
KSEO
KVPR
KSEP
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KRIM
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KMFO
KMOC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KREC
KX
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTRE
MASC
MG
MARAD
MRCRE
MW
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NATIONAL
NGO
NR
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OECD
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PCI
PG
POGOV
PHUMPGOV
PEL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PMIL
POV
PRL
PDOV
PTBS
PRAM
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
ROOD
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SG
SPCE
SK
STEINBERG
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SEN
SANC
SWE
SHI
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
THPY
TP
TBID
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UY
UNCHR
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNMIK
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
USUN
USNC
UNIDROIT
UNO
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06TOKYO442, JAPAN CONDUCTS NUCLEAR TERRORISM DRILL AT PLANT ON
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06TOKYO442.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06TOKYO442 | 2006-01-27 03:26 | 2011-05-07 05:00 | SECRET | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO3639
RR RUEHHM RUEHPB
DE RUEHKO #0442/01 0270326
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
R 270326Z JAN 06
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7872
INFO RUEHZN/ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLECTIVE
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 4236
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 6891
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 7289
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHMCSUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RHEFHLC/HOMELAND SECURITY CENTER WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 04 TOKYO 000442
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EAP/J
DEPT FOR ISN/NESS BURKART AND COMELLA
DOE FOR NNSA AOKI, GLASER AND C.STONE
NRC FOR KANE AND R.WAY
DOD FOR DTRA
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/20/2015
TAGS: ENRG JA KNNP TRGY
SUBJECT: JAPAN CONDUCTS NUCLEAR TERRORISM DRILL AT PLANT ON
SEA OF JAPAN COAST
REF: A. 05 TOKYO 6816
¶B. 05 TOKYO 5222
¶C. 05 TOKYO 5052
¶D. 05 OSAKA KOBE 367
¶E. 05 TOKYO 689
TOKYO 00000442 001.2 OF 004
Classified By: EST Minister-Counselor Joyce Rabens for 1.4 b, d-h
--Summary--
¶1. (C) On November 27, the GOJ conducted a one-day
large-scale drill to respond to a potential act of nuclear
terrorism under the auspices of the Protection of Citizens
Law or PCL. The drill focused on the Mihama Nuclear Power
Plant (NPP) that is located on the Sea of Japan coast in
Fukui Prefecture. The staged attack and the subsequent
events were all part of the first ever on-site drill
conducted by the GOJ under the PCL, which sets into place
measures that all levels of government are required to take
to protect Japan's citizens when attacked by a foreign
country or responding to a large-scale terrorist attack. The
drill involved nearly 2,000 participants that included
government officials, police, Self-Defense Forces, industry
employees and local residents. Because the drill focused
primarily on evacuating local residents and strengthening the
emergency response system, all available information
indicated that there was no component to the drill resembling
a Force-on-Force (FoF) exercise. The drill itself went very
smoothly, as the actions that various officials were required
to take were listed down to the finest detail with no
surprises thrown in. Several nuclear emergency officials
commented that this made the exercise a bit unrealistic.
¶2. (S) Japan took positive steps forward to boost physical
protection at its nuclear facilities in 2005 when a national
DBT took effect on December 1. Though this drill fell under
the auspices of a different law, the drill did make clear
that the GOJ is beginning to recognize that external threats
do exist to its 54 units scattered throughout the country.
Coordination between the prefectural governments and local
police on security issues will have to be strengthened if
Japan is to better prepare itself for such attacks as that
envisioned in the drill scenario. Though authorities would
not publicly admit that any specific country was in mind when
the drill was planned, some participants from Japan's nuclear
industry admitted that North Korea fit the bill perfectly.
Fukui Governor Nishikawa is concerned that there is a real
threat from North Korean saboteurs and ship intrusions to the
prefecture's 15 units. End Summary.
--Terrorists Attack Mihama: the Stage for the Drill--
¶3. (SBU) On November 27, the GOJ conducted a one-day
large-scale drill in response to a potential act of nuclear
terrorism under the auspices of the Protection of Citizens
Law (Kokumin Hogo Hou) or the PCL. The drill focused on the
Mihama Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) that is located on the
Wakasa Bay on the Sea of Japan coast near Tsuruga City in
Fukui Prefecture. The Mihama NPP is a pressurized water
reactor (PWR) facility operated by the Kansai Electric Power
Company (KEPCO) with three generating units and two central
control rooms. Total generating capacity for the plant is
1,666MW and the plant site area totals 586,000 square meters.
The plant is located on a small land outcropping and is
surrounded by water on three sides. It is connected to
Tsuruga Peninsula via a narrow bridge that is open only for
SIPDIS
the use of plant employees and contractors. The peninsula is
also home to the nearby JAEA-run Monju Fast Breeder Reactor
and JAEA's Fugen Plant that is currently in the state of
decommissioning. Other NPPs such as the Tsuruga, Takahama
and Ohi plants are within a 30-minute to one hour drive of
Mihama.
--Catching the Terrorists was Assumed: Over-scripted Drill
Focused on Evacuations--
¶4. (SBU) The staged attack on the Mihama NPP and the
TOKYO 00000442 002.2 OF 004
subsequent events were all part of the first ever on-site
drill conducted by the GOJ under the auspices of the
Protection of Citizens Law (PCL). The PCL was established in
June 2004 and went into effect in September of the same year.
The Law sets into place measures such as the provision of
warnings and evacuations that the national, prefectural and
local governments are required to take to protect Japan's
citizens when attacked by a foreign country, when expecting
an attack by a foreign power, and when responding to a
large-scale terrorist attack. Public service organizations
such as local bus and train companies are required to
cooperate with evacuation related activities, and other
organizations such as the media and utilities are also called
on to assist the government. Under the Law, prefectural
governments are required to have plans in place by the end of
JFY2005 that include details on how to evacuate local
populations if one of the above three events were to occur.
Municipal and town governments have an additional year to put
their plans into place. Fukui Prefecture had its plans in
place by late December 2004, far in advance of the deadline,
and was likely selected to host the drill for that reason.
¶5. (U) The drill involved nearly 2,000 participants that
included local and national government officials, police,
Self-Defense Force (SDF) troops, industry employees and local
residents. Its purpose was threefold: to verify the
functionality of emergency measures and cooperation among
relevant authorities and organizations; to verify the
capabilities of these authorities and organizations through
evaluation; and to enhance overall understanding of nuclear
emergency preparedness at all levels of government and among
the Japanese population. The massive exercise focused on
strengthening six areas of response: emergency communications
and information collection; the establishment of an emergency
countermeasures task force; the evacuation of residents;
rescue operations for residents; public notification; and
traffic control procedures in the hazard areas.
¶6. (U) The exercise scenario began with an armed mortar
attack on the Mihama NPP by an unknown number of terrorists
of unknown origin at 0700. The attack damaged Mihama Unit
Number Two and led to the strong potential that large amounts
of radiation were released into the atmosphere. The unit
automatically shut down and the operator informed the
authorities of the abnormalities at the site. At 0715, plant
employees manually shutdown Unit One. (Note: Mihama's Unit
Three is currently shutdown due to an earlier pipe rupture
accident. See reftels C and D). At approximately 0745,
Fukui Prefecture, local municipalities and the national
authorities established their emergency countermeasures task
forces and the prefecture requested the mobilization of SDF
troops per the conditions spelled out in the PCL. Mihama
employees evacuated the reactor building shortly thereafter.
At 0800 a siren sounded throughout the area warning local
residents of the emergency in Mihama. (Note: Neither ESToff
nor any of his companions were able to hear the siren in
Tsuruga City -- it turns out the drill was conducted on the
SIPDIS
assumption that a siren was sounded in the area).
Authorities next ordered the nearby Tsuruga NPP to shutdown
and gave the green light to mobilize SDF troops. At 0920,
government officials held a DVC and at 1010 a joint task
force held its first meeting. Thirty minutes later, five of
the terrorists were spotted in the hills near the plant.
(Note: most of the activities relating to the terrorists were
listed in the official scenario as ""assumed""). In the
following hours, officials were flown in from Tokyo and the
prefectural capital and the joint task force held several
additional meetings with all relevant parties and conducted
press briefings. By 1145 evacuation measures and vehicles
were in place, and within 45 minutes boats, helicopters and
buses with an SDF escort evacuated 70 volunteer citizens to
designated points. Around 1250, three additional terrorists
were spotted in boats off the coast and were captured by the
Japan Coast Guard thirty minutes later. Evacuation
operations were completed by 1500 and evacuees were screened
by medical teams for radiation exposure. At approximately
1600 the drill was concluded and organizers held a press
TOKYO 00000442 003.2 OF 004
conference.
¶7. (C) Registered observers including ESToff -- the only
non-Japanese participant observing the activities -- were
shuttled back and forth by buses to observe the various parts
of the drill, though access was not granted to the plant
controlled areas themselves. ESToff was unable to confirm
firsthand whether the unarmed security force at the plant
actually went through the motions of protecting the plant
from the terrorists. Because the drill focused primarily on
evacuating local residents and strengthening the emergency
response system, all available information indicated that
there was no component to the drill resembling the
Force-on-Force (FoF) exercises conducted in the United
States. Local residents not directly participating in the
drill seemed to continue their regular daily routines and
tourists visiting the area did not appear to be alarmed by
the visible SDF presence. Roadblocks for the drill were
mostly placed off to the side of roads in what appeared to be
an effort by police to not impose the drill on
non-participants.
¶8. (U) In a follow-up article run by the Yomiuri Newspaper, a
moderate paper with national circulation, the paper
criticized the fact that the drill was somewhat disconnected
from the reality on the ground. Most notably, the Yomiuri
said that exercise did not take into account the large
numbers of beachgoers that typically bathe in the waters near
the plant and how these individuals would be evacuated if an
attack were to take place in the summer. The paper also
called for strengthened joint police-SDF training and said
that many local governments underestimate the need to beef up
their ability to cope with a foreign military or guerrilla
attack. The Yomiuri noted that as of the end of November
2005 when the drill was conducted, only Fukui and Tottori
prefectures had completed operation manuals detailing how
authorities would evacuate residents in such an emergency.
--Comment--
¶9. (C) The drill itself went very smoothly. Though the buzz
and whirl of overhead helicopters ferrying evacuees to a
flotilla of Japan Coast Guard ships just off the coast and a
small army of medical officials in masks and gowns with
Geiger counters was an exciting site to see, the drill was a
bit too scripted and perfect. The actions that the various
officials were required to take wQAuQ1Qc+Xjcy officials who were observing the
drill
commented to ESToff that this made the exercise a bit
unrealistic and that it was important to not run drills
strictly according to the scenario. Expressing a somewhat
different opinion, one participant explained that the minute
details were important given the fact that so many players
were involved in the first-time drill -- the simple fact that
the multiple agencies and industry officials were able to
communicate as smoothly as they did was an accomplishment in
and of itself, according to the official.
¶10. (C) Japan took positive steps forward to boost physical
protection at its nuclear facilities in 2005 when a national
DBT took effect on December 1. Though this drill fell under
the auspices of a different law and focused primarily on the
logistics of ensuring that surrounding communities were kept
safe after a terrorist incident at a nuclear facility, the
drill did make clear that the GOJ is beginning to recognize
that, at a minimum, external threats do exist to its 54
nuclear units scattered throughout the country. This
specific drill did not test the operator's security response
to the terrorist attack on the plant. However, there does
appear to be some movement in the direction of introducing
Force-on-Force drills as part of the regulatory structure in
Japan. In planning for bilateral consultations to follow-up
on the August 2005 interagency physical protection
discussions held in Tokyo (see reftel), a MEXT official told
ESToff that the GOJ was planning to create FoF drills for its
TOKYO 00000442 004.2 OF 004
licensees to be used in the future.
¶11. (S) Coordination between the prefectural governments and
local police on security issues will have to be strengthened
if Japan is to better prepare itself for attacks as
envisioned in the drill scenario. A senior nuclear safety
official in the Fukui government -- the prefecture with the
most reactors -- admitted in confidence that his office had
no contact with the local police on plant security issues.
He lamented that the local government could do only so much,
and argued that it was important to involve the SDF in the
protection of the facilities as well. (Note: The Fukui
Prefectural government is significantly involved in
overseeing the nuclear facilities on its territory and
imposes regulatory obligations on the operators in addition
to those set by central government regulators. In this
sense, the above comment is coming from an official in the
most prepared of Japan's prefectures.)
¶12. (S) Though authorities would not publicly admit that they
had any specific country in mind when the drill was planned,
participants from Japan's nuclear industry admitted to ESToff
that North Korea fit the bill perfectly. In an earlier visit
to nuclear facilities in the region, ESToff met with Fukui
Prefecture nuclear safety officials who confided that
Governor Issei Nishikawa was concerned that there was a real
threat from North Korean saboteurs and ship intrusions to the
prefecture's 15 plants. The officials explained that DPRK
subs had been spotted in the area in the past, and noted that
abductions of Japanese citizens by North Korean agents had
occurred from the prefecture's beaches.
¶13. (S) The prefecture's concerns are reasonable given the
location of the plant on the Sea of Japan coast in a
relatively sparsely populated hilly area and the fact that
contract guards at Japan's nuclear facilities are unarmed.
ESToff had visited the Mihama NPP several months prior to the
drill to discuss the pipe rupture accident that occurred in
2004 and to tour the plant's facilities. During that time,
security was present, but appeared to have shortcomings.
Vehicular access is restricted to the main facility, and
pre-registered visitors are asked to park at a public
relations facility that is located on the main peninsula just
on the other side of the bridge. The PR facilities are an
approach that nuclear operators have taken across Japan to
balance the need of relating information on the safety and
economic benefits of the plant to the public, while
increasing plant security by cutting back on the number of
visitors who actually enter restricted areas. After crossing
a first checkpoint and the bridge, visitors are then
processed through a second access point that has movable
barriers and radiation monitoring equipment. At this point a
guard makes a cursory check of the visitor's picture ID.
Plant officials explained that KEPCO was planning to further
boost Mihama's security by installing bag-screening equipment
(similar to those found at airports) to check visitors' bags
at this location.
¶14. (S) Senior plant officials admitted to ESToff that the
plant occasionally has problems with fisherman coming close
to its shores given the fact that water temperatures are
slightly higher near the NPP due to the plant's discharge
water which leads to the growth of larger fish. When this
occurs, plant security usually gets on a loud horn and warns
the fishermen to leave the restricted waters. In addition,
thousands of sun seekers swim in the waters next to the
plant, so it would be fairly difficult to immediately
distinguish something out of the ordinary. These two facts
combined made the Mihama NPP a good facility to hold the
drill at. Officials also admitted to ESToff that the plant's
intruder detection system often has false alarms due to wild
boars and other animals encroaching into the area. On the
day of the visit, ESToff spotted the typical police presence
at commercial nuclear facilities -- a lightly armored police
vehicle with up to six police officers -- some of them fast
asleep. End comment.
SCHIEFFER