

Currently released so far... 12559 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AR
AF
ASEC
AMBASSADOR
AS
AJ
AM
AORC
AEMR
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AFIN
AMGT
AODE
APEC
AE
ABLD
ACBAQ
APECO
AFSI
AFSN
AY
AO
ABUD
AG
AC
APER
AU
AMED
ATRN
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
AL
ASUP
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ACOA
AADP
ASCH
AA
AFU
AN
AID
ALOW
AINF
AMG
AIT
ANET
AGAO
AROC
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
AMCHAMS
ACS
APCS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
ADM
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
BR
BK
BL
BA
BO
BRUSSELS
BM
BEXP
BU
BG
BB
BTIO
BF
BD
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BP
BE
BH
BT
BY
BILAT
BWC
BN
BMGT
BTIU
BC
CI
CU
CO
CS
CVIS
CA
CJAN
CARICOM
CB
CASC
CE
CH
CN
CONDOLEEZZA
CMGT
CWC
CW
CG
CACS
CY
CPAS
CFED
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CBW
CONS
CD
CLINTON
CHR
CACM
CDB
COE
CDG
CDC
CAN
CR
CF
CT
CODEL
CJUS
CTM
CM
CLMT
CBC
COUNTERTERRORISM
CAPC
CAC
COUNTER
CV
CL
CBSA
CNARC
CEUDA
COM
CROS
CIA
CARSON
COPUOS
CTR
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CIS
CKGR
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
ECA
EU
ENRG
EPET
ETTC
ETRD
ELN
ELAB
EC
EFIN
ECON
EFIS
ELTN
EAGR
EIND
EWWT
EMIN
EINV
EAID
EG
EUN
ECPS
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ENIV
ECIN
EAIR
EI
ECUN
EFTA
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ES
ELECTIONS
EN
EIAR
ET
EINDETRD
EUR
EZ
EREL
ER
ECONEFIN
EINT
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
EPA
ENVR
EINVETC
ETRC
ENVI
ECONCS
ECONOMIC
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ESA
ECINECONCS
EAIG
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUREM
ESENV
ETRN
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EEPET
ENERG
EUC
EUNCH
EXIM
ERD
ERNG
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EXBS
IIP
IC
IR
IN
IAEA
IS
IT
IMF
IBRD
IZ
IWC
ISRAELI
INTERPOL
IO
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ILO
IPR
IQ
IV
IRS
INRB
ICAO
IMO
ID
IZPREL
IRAJ
ICTY
ICRC
IAHRC
ITF
INR
IGAD
ILC
ITU
IF
ITPHUM
IL
INTERNAL
ISRAEL
IACI
ICJ
ITRA
INMARSAT
ICTR
IA
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IBET
INRA
INRO
IDP
INDO
IRC
IDA
ITPGOV
IEA
KPAO
KCRM
KNNP
KCOR
KIRF
KISL
KSCA
KDEM
KDEMAF
KZ
KBTR
KUNR
KMDR
KRVC
KPAL
KTIA
KV
KJUS
KOMC
KTFN
KWBG
KTIP
KMPI
KSUM
KIRC
KE
KIPR
KWMN
KFRD
KSEP
KN
KOLY
KPKO
KIDE
KMRS
KFLU
KSAF
KGIC
KRAD
KU
KHLS
KOCI
KSTH
KS
KGHG
KAWC
KICC
KG
KSPR
KPRP
KDRG
KGIT
KVPR
KGCC
KSEO
KMCA
KSTC
KBIO
KHIV
KBCT
KPAI
KICA
KTDB
KACT
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KFLO
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPIN
KCOM
KESS
KDEV
KCFE
KNUC
KAWK
KPLS
KWWMN
KCIP
KPRV
KHDP
KTEX
KFIN
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KLIG
KMIG
KDDG
KRGY
KFSC
KR
KMOC
KPAONZ
KNAR
KIFR
KCGC
KID
KSAC
KAID
KNSD
KWMNCS
KCMR
KO
KNEI
KPOA
KTER
KOMS
KPAK
KTBT
KWMM
KWAC
KHSA
KX
KMFO
KPWR
KRIM
KSCI
KVRP
KENV
KCRCM
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
MARR
MX
MOPS
MNUC
MZ
MASS
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MIL
MTCRE
MCAP
MAS
MO
MTCR
MD
MK
MP
MY
MR
MT
MCC
MIK
MU
ML
MARAD
MA
MAPS
MV
MERCOSUR
MASC
MPOS
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MEPP
MRCRE
MEDIA
MAPP
MTRE
MEPN
MI
MC
MUCN
MAR
MASSMNUC
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
NATO
NL
NZ
NI
NU
NO
NPT
NRR
NA
NATIONAL
NIPP
NAFTA
NT
NS
NE
NASA
NSF
NP
NAR
NV
NORAD
NG
NSSP
NW
NK
NDP
NR
NATOPREL
NEW
NPA
NPG
NSG
NSFO
NGO
NSC
NH
NZUS
NC
OFDA
OTRA
OPRC
OIIP
OAS
OPDC
OVIP
OEXC
OPIC
OSCE
OPCW
OREP
OFFICIALS
ODIP
OECD
OMIG
OFDP
OBSP
OIE
OSCI
OES
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OIC
ON
OCII
OCS
OTR
OSAC
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PHUM
PA
PBTS
PINS
PM
PREF
PHSA
PK
POL
PL
PE
PFOR
PALESTINIAN
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNAT
PNR
PROP
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PSOE
PU
POGOV
PMIL
PINL
PHUMPREL
PGIV
PBT
PAK
PP
PGOC
PY
PLN
PMAR
PHUH
PBIO
PF
PRL
PG
PHUS
PTBS
PRAM
POV
PEL
PAS
POLICY
PGGV
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PSA
PDOV
PCI
PREO
PAHO
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPGOV
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PARMS
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PINF
PNG
RU
RS
RICE
RW
RCMP
RO
RFE
RP
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
REGION
RUPREL
RF
RELATIONS
RM
REACTION
ROOD
REPORT
RSO
RSP
SNAR
SENV
SOCI
SCUL
SY
SR
SU
SO
SP
SA
SZ
SF
SMIG
SW
SIPDIS
STEINBERG
SN
SNARIZ
SG
SNARN
SSA
SK
SI
SPCVIS
SOFA
SC
SL
SARS
SNARCS
SIPRS
SYR
SANC
SEVN
SWE
SHI
SEN
SHUM
SYRIA
SH
SPCE
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
TW
TRGY
TU
TPHY
TBIO
TX
TN
TSPL
TC
TZ
TSPA
TS
TF
TI
TIP
TH
TINT
TNGD
TP
TD
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TL
TV
TT
TERRORISM
TR
THPY
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
UK
UP
US
UNSC
UNHCR
USEU
UNGA
UG
UY
UNESCO
UN
USTR
USOAS
UZ
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNHRC
UNDESCO
UNMIK
UNDP
UNC
UNO
UNAUS
UV
UNICEF
UNCHR
UNDC
UNCHC
UNPUOS
USUN
USNC
UNCSD
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06WELLINGTON128, NATIONAL CONTEMPLATES CHANGE ON NUCLEAR BAN STANCE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06WELLINGTON128.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06WELLINGTON128 | 2006-02-17 05:15 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHWL #0128/01 0480515
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 170515Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2399
INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 4299
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RHHJJAA/JICPAC HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L WELLINGTON 000128
SIPDIS
NOFORN
SIPDIS
STATE FOR D (FRITZ), EAP/FO, AND EAP/ANP
NSC FOR VICTOR CHA
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISA LIZ PHU
PACOM FOR JO1E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/17/2016
TAGS: PREL PGOV NZ
SUBJECT: NATIONAL CONTEMPLATES CHANGE ON NUCLEAR BAN STANCE
REF: 05 WELLINGTON 702
Classified By: Acting DCM Katherine B. Hadda,
for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (C) Summary: The opposition National Party is considering
changing its policy regarding New Zealand's anti-nuclear ban,
hoping to thereby remove one of Labour's strongest weapons
against National. Senior Party officials have explained to us
behind the scenes that the modification would only clarify
existing policy by removing any reference to a possible
referendum on whether to repeal the legislation. While at
first glance the potential change seems significant, it
reality it was always unlikely National could meet the
current policy's pre-condition of public support for a vote.
It was even less likely the result would be a majority vote
in favor of removing what many see as an iconic piece of
legislation. End Summary.
¶2. (SBU) At a recent National Party caucus retreat held
prior to the start of the parliamentary year, two issues
dominated the agenda: a possible challenge to the current
leadership and a proposed change to the party's anti-nuclear
policy. Although the eye of the media was fixed upon the
leadership issue, a more critical issue largely flew beneath
the radar: During the caucus retreat, National's Foreign
Affairs spokesman Murray McCully moved that the party drop
its current nuclear ban policy, which states that a National
Government would only support a change to the anti-nuclear
legislation if it had a clear public mandate by means of a
referendum.
¶3. (C) McCully has, at this stage, only sought caucus
approval for a discussion on the nuclear ban issue at a later
date. However, he has told DCM and others that he wants
National's policy to grant unconditional support to the
status quo, i.e. to say the party supports maintaining the
anti-nuclear legislation. Despite party leader Don Brash
refusing to publicly state where he stands on the proposal,
Post believes that he supports removing the possible
referendum from the party's policy.
Why the potential change?
-------------------------
¶4. (SBU) National rightly believes that the referendum
provision has been deliberately misrepresented by Labour to
create confusion and doubt in the public's mind. The strategy
of constantly attacking National over the issue was largely
successful for Labour during the last general election, as it
repeatedly put Brash on the defensive when he tried to
explain his party's policy. Although Brash insisted National
had "no intention of removing the ban," confusion remained as
to why the party was mooting the possibility of a referendum
if they did not intend to change the law. Brash's difficulty
in mounting a convincing argument was also compounded by
Labour's repeated (and deliberately misleading) claims that
Brash told a visiting CODEL that the nuclear ban would be
"gone by lunchtime" if National were returned to power under
his premiership.
¶5. (C) The resulting confusion over the referendum pledge
has led much of the public to forget that National's policy
actually supports maintaining the existing nuclear
legislation absent a referendum called as a result of public
demands. Confusion mounted when National also said that it
would consider it had a mandate to change the legislation if
elected on a platform to do so. After Labour made hay from
that policy as well, National hastily added it had no
intention of including a proposed nuclear ban change in its
platform any time soon.
Pragmatic rationale
--------------------
¶6. (C) The proposal to re-calibrate National's nuclear
position is part of a broad review of the National's election
campaign. McCully confided to visiting EAP/ANP Director
Howard Krawitz that the party's polling shows the nuclear
issue definitely cost it votes.
¶7. (C) McCully says the policy change is not a done deal,
and apparently the party has not laid down a timetable for
addressing the issue. But any change to National's nuclear
policy would probably have to come sooner rather than later.
Some senior National MPs fear that if this and other policies
are changed closer to the election year (now scheduled for
2008) it will look like public pandering rather than
strategic thinking. McCully has also conceded that a
protracted delay could create further confusion in the
public's mind.
National committed to remain pro-US despite policy shift.
--------------------------------------------- -------------
¶8. (C) McCully has hastened to reassure us that change to
National's nuclear policy will not dilute National's
commitment towards improving the bilateral relationship. He
has argued that despite the move to unreservedly uphold the
nuclear legislation it is possible to "still have a positive
view about the United States." McCully told EAP/ANP Director
Krawitz that his party wants to focus attention on ways New
Zealand can advance its relations with the United States in a
nonpartisan way. He said if National and Labour both agree
that the ban should remain in place, National can better
focus attention on Labour's gratuitous anti-American
statements and overall failure to improve relations with the
United States. McCully claimed that former National PM Jim
Bolger was encouraging the change in policy, apparently
arguing that the New Zealand public will only support removal
of the ban if compelled by a crisis. (Comment: McCully did
not articulate what this would be, but presumably a natural
disaster requiring an air carrier to enter New Zealand's
waters or a terrorist attack. End Comment.) Until then, the
party gains nothing by pushing for a change.
¶9. (C) McCully also says that in the short term, National
will criticize Labour's failure to improve bilateral
relations and will also seek ways to build on US-NZ
cooperation in a variety of areas. In the medium-term, it
will try to move public opinion to be more supportive of the
United States. Although the policy has not yet changed,
McCully tried out National's new strategy in a radio debate
last week with Defense Minister Goff, who called National's
shift a "flip flop" and said the party can't be trusted.
McCully responded that Labour was unwilling to improve its
relations with the U.S. because many in Government are
anti-American.
Labour's response to the proposed change.
--------------------------------------------- -------------
¶10. (C) Predictably, Labour has tried to capitalize on
National's plans. Before the National caucus had even
discussed McCully's proposition, Defence Minister Phil Goff
went to the media to turn the issue from being about whether
National would keep New Zealand nuclear-free into the wider
question of National's overall credibility. He asserted that
given that National had made so many reversals on the issue
of nuclear ship visits, the public would surely not believe
the party had really changed its mind this time. Goff has
since repeated this line of attack within the Parliamentary
debating chamber.
Comment:
--------
¶11. (C) While on the surface National's possible change in
policy seems significant, in reality there is less there than
meets the eye. Although the party has previously
commissioned studies questioning the logic of the
anti-nuclear legislation, and many of its MPs have privately
told us they support removal of the ban, National's official
policy always was to retain the law absent a voter referendum
to repeal it. Given the strong and widespread support for
the anti-nuclear legislation, such a referendum would almost
surely fail.
¶12. (C) We know only one National MP -- the newcomer Chris
Finlayson -- who thought a National Government should change
the legislation right after winning an election, without a
referendum. But he also thought the Government should then
shelve the issue by not encouraging or allowing any ship
visits for a number of years. Significantly, following the
recent caucus even Finlayson seems resigned to the
impossibility of changing the legislation any time soon.
¶13. (C) As we reported during the election campaign
(reftel), a National Government would be unable to change the
nuclear legislation over the shorter term because of strong
public opinion in favor of the ban and because of the party's
own reduced credibility on the issue after repeated Labour
attacks. But we also continue to believe a National
Government would be better able to rebuild much of the trust
that has eroded US-NZ relations over the past years. For our
part, Post will continue to tell National and others that we
welcome the chance to build stronger bilateral relations,
even if the extent of the improvement will remain constrained
by the significant "unfinished business" that still remains
between us. End Comment.
McCormick