

Currently released so far... 12559 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AR
AF
ASEC
AMBASSADOR
AS
AJ
AM
AORC
AEMR
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AFIN
AMGT
AODE
APEC
AE
ABLD
ACBAQ
APECO
AFSI
AFSN
AY
AO
ABUD
AG
AC
APER
AU
AMED
ATRN
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
AL
ASUP
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ACOA
AADP
ASCH
AA
AFU
AN
AID
ALOW
AINF
AMG
AIT
ANET
AGAO
AROC
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
AMCHAMS
ACS
APCS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
ADM
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
BR
BK
BL
BA
BO
BRUSSELS
BM
BEXP
BU
BG
BB
BTIO
BF
BD
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BP
BE
BH
BT
BY
BILAT
BWC
BN
BMGT
BTIU
BC
CI
CU
CO
CS
CVIS
CA
CJAN
CARICOM
CB
CASC
CE
CH
CN
CONDOLEEZZA
CMGT
CWC
CW
CG
CACS
CY
CPAS
CFED
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CBW
CONS
CD
CLINTON
CHR
CACM
CDB
COE
CDG
CDC
CAN
CR
CF
CT
CODEL
CJUS
CTM
CM
CLMT
CBC
COUNTERTERRORISM
CAPC
CAC
COUNTER
CV
CL
CBSA
CNARC
CEUDA
COM
CROS
CIA
CARSON
COPUOS
CTR
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CIS
CKGR
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
ECA
EU
ENRG
EPET
ETTC
ETRD
ELN
ELAB
EC
EFIN
ECON
EFIS
ELTN
EAGR
EIND
EWWT
EMIN
EINV
EAID
EG
EUN
ECPS
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ENIV
ECIN
EAIR
EI
ECUN
EFTA
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ES
ELECTIONS
EN
EIAR
ET
EINDETRD
EUR
EZ
EREL
ER
ECONEFIN
EINT
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
EPA
ENVR
EINVETC
ETRC
ENVI
ECONCS
ECONOMIC
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ESA
ECINECONCS
EAIG
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUREM
ESENV
ETRN
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EEPET
ENERG
EUC
EUNCH
EXIM
ERD
ERNG
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EXBS
IIP
IC
IR
IN
IAEA
IS
IT
IMF
IBRD
IZ
IWC
ISRAELI
INTERPOL
IO
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ILO
IPR
IQ
IV
IRS
INRB
ICAO
IMO
ID
IZPREL
IRAJ
ICTY
ICRC
IAHRC
ITF
INR
IGAD
ILC
ITU
IF
ITPHUM
IL
INTERNAL
ISRAEL
IACI
ICJ
ITRA
INMARSAT
ICTR
IA
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IBET
INRA
INRO
IDP
INDO
IRC
IDA
ITPGOV
IEA
KPAO
KCRM
KNNP
KCOR
KIRF
KISL
KSCA
KDEM
KDEMAF
KZ
KBTR
KUNR
KMDR
KRVC
KPAL
KTIA
KV
KJUS
KOMC
KTFN
KWBG
KTIP
KMPI
KSUM
KIRC
KE
KIPR
KWMN
KFRD
KSEP
KN
KOLY
KPKO
KIDE
KMRS
KFLU
KSAF
KGIC
KRAD
KU
KHLS
KOCI
KSTH
KS
KGHG
KAWC
KICC
KG
KSPR
KPRP
KDRG
KGIT
KVPR
KGCC
KSEO
KMCA
KSTC
KBIO
KHIV
KBCT
KPAI
KICA
KTDB
KACT
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KFLO
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPIN
KCOM
KESS
KDEV
KCFE
KNUC
KAWK
KPLS
KWWMN
KCIP
KPRV
KHDP
KTEX
KFIN
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KLIG
KMIG
KDDG
KRGY
KFSC
KR
KMOC
KPAONZ
KNAR
KIFR
KCGC
KID
KSAC
KAID
KNSD
KWMNCS
KCMR
KO
KNEI
KPOA
KTER
KOMS
KPAK
KTBT
KWMM
KWAC
KHSA
KX
KMFO
KPWR
KRIM
KSCI
KVRP
KENV
KCRCM
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
MARR
MX
MOPS
MNUC
MZ
MASS
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MIL
MTCRE
MCAP
MAS
MO
MTCR
MD
MK
MP
MY
MR
MT
MCC
MIK
MU
ML
MARAD
MA
MAPS
MV
MERCOSUR
MASC
MPOS
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MEPP
MRCRE
MEDIA
MAPP
MTRE
MEPN
MI
MC
MUCN
MAR
MASSMNUC
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
NATO
NL
NZ
NI
NU
NO
NPT
NRR
NA
NATIONAL
NIPP
NAFTA
NT
NS
NE
NASA
NSF
NP
NAR
NV
NORAD
NG
NSSP
NW
NK
NDP
NR
NATOPREL
NEW
NPA
NPG
NSG
NSFO
NGO
NSC
NH
NZUS
NC
OFDA
OTRA
OPRC
OIIP
OAS
OPDC
OVIP
OEXC
OPIC
OSCE
OPCW
OREP
OFFICIALS
ODIP
OECD
OMIG
OFDP
OBSP
OIE
OSCI
OES
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OIC
ON
OCII
OCS
OTR
OSAC
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PHUM
PA
PBTS
PINS
PM
PREF
PHSA
PK
POL
PL
PE
PFOR
PALESTINIAN
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNAT
PNR
PROP
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PSOE
PU
POGOV
PMIL
PINL
PHUMPREL
PGIV
PBT
PAK
PP
PGOC
PY
PLN
PMAR
PHUH
PBIO
PF
PRL
PG
PHUS
PTBS
PRAM
POV
PEL
PAS
POLICY
PGGV
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PSA
PDOV
PCI
PREO
PAHO
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPGOV
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PARMS
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PINF
PNG
RU
RS
RICE
RW
RCMP
RO
RFE
RP
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
REGION
RUPREL
RF
RELATIONS
RM
REACTION
ROOD
REPORT
RSO
RSP
SNAR
SENV
SOCI
SCUL
SY
SR
SU
SO
SP
SA
SZ
SF
SMIG
SW
SIPDIS
STEINBERG
SN
SNARIZ
SG
SNARN
SSA
SK
SI
SPCVIS
SOFA
SC
SL
SARS
SNARCS
SIPRS
SYR
SANC
SEVN
SWE
SHI
SEN
SHUM
SYRIA
SH
SPCE
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
TW
TRGY
TU
TPHY
TBIO
TX
TN
TSPL
TC
TZ
TSPA
TS
TF
TI
TIP
TH
TINT
TNGD
TP
TD
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TL
TV
TT
TERRORISM
TR
THPY
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
UK
UP
US
UNSC
UNHCR
USEU
UNGA
UG
UY
UNESCO
UN
USTR
USOAS
UZ
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNHRC
UNDESCO
UNMIK
UNDP
UNC
UNO
UNAUS
UV
UNICEF
UNCHR
UNDC
UNCHC
UNPUOS
USUN
USNC
UNCSD
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08LONDON1115, HMG OUTLINES NEW PROCEDURES FOR REQUESTING INTEL
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08LONDON1115.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08LONDON1115 | 2008-04-18 15:31 | 2010-12-01 23:00 | SECRET//NOFORN | Embassy London |
VZCZCXYZ0001
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHLO #1115/01 1091531
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 181531Z APR 08
FM AMEMBASSY LONDON
TO RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE IMMEDIATE
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8309
RUMICEA/USCENTCOM INTEL CEN MACDILL AFB FL IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/CJCS WASHDC IMMEDIATE
INFO RUEHLB/AMEMBASSY BEIRUT 0272
RUEHLO/USDAO LONDON UK
RUEHLO/USDAO LONDON UK//AIROPS//
S E C R E T LONDON 001115
SIPDIS
NOFORN
SIPDIS
STATE FOR PM ACTION TEAM
EO 12958 DECL: 04/18/2018
TAGS MOPS, MARR, PINR, PREL, UK
SUBJECT: HMG OUTLINES NEW PROCEDURES FOR REQUESTING INTEL
FLIGHT CLEARANCES
REF: A. LONDON 1064
¶B. TREMONT-PM ACTION TEAM EMAIL APRIL 16
Classified By: Political Minister Counselor Maura Connelly, reason 1.4, a/b/c/d.
¶1. (S/NF) Summary and Action Request. The UK Ministry of Defense summoned PolMilOff April 15 to receive the letter in para 2 on new procedures for requesting HMG permission to use UK territory to launch intelligence flights. This letter, evidently what DG Mariot Leslie was referring to in her April 14 meeting with DCM (ref a), requests that ALL future requests to use UK territory for intel flights be conveyed by Embassy London and be accompanied by enough information that ministers can fully consider whether sensitive missions might put the UK at risk of being complicit in unlawful acts. We understand that these additional precautionary measures stem from the February revelation that the USG transited renditioned persons through Diego Garcia without UK permission and HMG’s resultant need to ensure it is not similarly blindsided in the future. Embassy London invites relevant USG agencies to convey concerns or questions that should be brought to MOD’s attention in an initial meeting on the issue April 22. End Summary.
¶2. (S/Rel UK) Begin Text of Letter (note internal numbering):
9 April 2008
Dear Ms. Tremont,
UK INTELLIGENCE GATHERING FLIGHTS FROM UK BASES
¶1. I am grateful for your help in resolving the current issues regarding UK Government authorisation of U2 sorties flown from RAF Akrotiri, Cyprus, over Lebanon. While I am not suggesting that established procedures were not followed in this case, events have demonstrated that we need to set up a more formal mechanism for seeking agreement to the use of UK bases for intelligence flights which will enable any legal and political concerns to be addressed and resolved. This is particularly important for sensitive intelligence gathering operations, for example where information is passed to third parties. We would like to have a single US point of contact through which the requests would be routed. Given that flight missions may be directed by either State Department or the Pentagon (or possibly other agencies), it would seem sensible for all requests to be passed through the US Embassy in London to me.
¶2. We have a very good working relationship with EUCOM which uses well-established procedures for identifying and discussing the regular intelligence flights that the US undertakes from RAF Akrotiri and from RAF Mildenhall. MOD seeks approval of these missions from Foreign and Commonwealth Office as well as Defence Ministers, every four months (and we clear similar UK flights through the same process). To date, the details of these flights have been discussed at desk level, any concerns have been highlighted and resolved, and staffing action taken here to put the cases to Ministers along with any necessary supporting advice. In many respects, these flights have become routine, and the issues raised have not normally proved complex or overly sensitive.
¶3. However, recent U2 flights over Turkey/Northern Iraq, and the Lebanon, have highlighted important legal and political issues which require much more careful consideration by HMG. In both cases, intelligence product is intended to be passed to third party governments, and it is important for us to be satisfied that HMG is not indirectly aiding the commission of unlawful acts by those governments on the basis of the information gathered through the assistance we provide to the US. This is a very important point for UK Ministers, and it is now clear that the approvals procedures must be robust enough to capture and deal with these issues at an early stage. There are further forms of risk that we need to assess in putting the case for agreement to our Ministers, including the political risk that other governments become aware of, and potentially object to, the flights (hence our need to know flight profiles). In
particular, there are sensitivities with Government of Cyprus regarding the use of Sovereign Ba se Areas in Cyprus.
¶4. In the light of this, we feel that a formal approach should be made from the US Government to MOD, seeking approval for specified intelligence gathering flights using UK bases. We envisage this approach setting out the flight programmes, with sortie profiles and the other information provided by EUCOM, but also setting out in as much detail as possible: the purpose and scope of the mission; whether it is a national task or in support of a bi-lateral or multi-lateral agreement; which other nations have been informed of the mission and -- if the intelligence gathered is to be passed to a third party -- the purpose for which this is happening, the expected use to which the information will be put (and by which agencies of the third party), and an assessment of any legal or human rights implications. We would need to be informed of any changes to this information prior to revised missions being flown in order to ensure we had the required Ministerial approvals in place. As now, most if not all such flights can be captured in the current four-monthly approval cycle, but we stand ready to receive additional requests between each cyclical submission should flight profiles and/or missions be amended or added at short notice.
¶5. We will continue to liaise at the military-to-military level with EUCOM over flight details, but also wish to receive political and legal input, via the Embassy, from the appropriate USG agency. Naturally, approaches need to be made as early as possible to allow time for clearing queries and UK staffing (though we can and do turn round most requests very quickly).
¶6. I have attached a schedule of the missions that EUCOM have informed us that they would like to fly in the period 1 May - 31 August 2008. In order to start the new process I would be grateful if you could approach the relevant USG authorities to provide the additional information that I have mentioned for each mission type. I recognise that this may be a complex task but I think it will establish a firm foundation for the new procedure I have described.
¶7. I am sure you will understand the sensitivities involved in the use of UK bases for covert or potentially controversial missions, and hence our desire to formalise the approvals process in this way. I would be happy to discuss mechanics in more detail. We would, however, like to set up the new process as quickly as possible, and in time for the next four-monthly approval due at the end of April. I would welcome a meeting with you and your colleagues to assist in the setting up of the new process.
Yours sincerely,
W M Jessett (Director Counter-Terrorism and UK Operations (Policy))
Annex
¶A. Flights requested by EUCOM from 1 May - 31 August 2008 (In ref B)
End Text.
¶3. (S/NF) Comment. Embassy London would welcome other agencies’ comments and questions for MOD on these new procedures; our first meeting to discuss this is scheduled for April 22. At first glance, we find them rather burdensome. For starters, we are reluctant to make Embassy London the POC on these requests, which had been worked successfully in mil-mil channels at EUCOM before now; this seems to be an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy. We further believe that the request to provide this amount of additional information for well-established missions scheduled to continue May 1, is an extremely tight deadline and we will push back on this requirement. Embassy London POCs for this issue are Pam Tremont (tremontpm@state.sgov.gov), and Col. Jeff Hosken (dihosja@dia.smil.mil).
Visit London’s Classified Website: http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/wiki/Portal:Unit ed_Kingdom LEBARON