

Currently released so far... 12559 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AR
AF
ASEC
AMBASSADOR
AS
AJ
AM
AORC
AEMR
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AFIN
AMGT
AODE
APEC
AE
ABLD
ACBAQ
APECO
AFSI
AFSN
AY
AO
ABUD
AG
AC
APER
AU
AMED
ATRN
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
AL
ASUP
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ACOA
AADP
ASCH
AA
AFU
AN
AID
ALOW
AINF
AMG
AIT
ANET
AGAO
AROC
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
AMCHAMS
ACS
APCS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
ADM
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
BR
BK
BL
BA
BO
BRUSSELS
BM
BEXP
BU
BG
BB
BTIO
BF
BD
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BP
BE
BH
BT
BY
BILAT
BWC
BN
BMGT
BTIU
BC
CI
CU
CO
CS
CVIS
CA
CJAN
CARICOM
CB
CASC
CE
CH
CN
CONDOLEEZZA
CMGT
CWC
CW
CG
CACS
CY
CPAS
CFED
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CBW
CONS
CD
CLINTON
CHR
CACM
CDB
COE
CDG
CDC
CAN
CR
CF
CT
CODEL
CJUS
CTM
CM
CLMT
CBC
COUNTERTERRORISM
CAPC
CAC
COUNTER
CV
CL
CBSA
CNARC
CEUDA
COM
CROS
CIA
CARSON
COPUOS
CTR
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CIS
CKGR
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
ECA
EU
ENRG
EPET
ETTC
ETRD
ELN
ELAB
EC
EFIN
ECON
EFIS
ELTN
EAGR
EIND
EWWT
EMIN
EINV
EAID
EG
EUN
ECPS
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ENIV
ECIN
EAIR
EI
ECUN
EFTA
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ES
ELECTIONS
EN
EIAR
ET
EINDETRD
EUR
EZ
EREL
ER
ECONEFIN
EINT
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
EPA
ENVR
EINVETC
ETRC
ENVI
ECONCS
ECONOMIC
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ESA
ECINECONCS
EAIG
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUREM
ESENV
ETRN
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EEPET
ENERG
EUC
EUNCH
EXIM
ERD
ERNG
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EXBS
IIP
IC
IR
IN
IAEA
IS
IT
IMF
IBRD
IZ
IWC
ISRAELI
INTERPOL
IO
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ILO
IPR
IQ
IV
IRS
INRB
ICAO
IMO
ID
IZPREL
IRAJ
ICTY
ICRC
IAHRC
ITF
INR
IGAD
ILC
ITU
IF
ITPHUM
IL
INTERNAL
ISRAEL
IACI
ICJ
ITRA
INMARSAT
ICTR
IA
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IBET
INRA
INRO
IDP
INDO
IRC
IDA
ITPGOV
IEA
KPAO
KCRM
KNNP
KCOR
KIRF
KISL
KSCA
KDEM
KDEMAF
KZ
KBTR
KUNR
KMDR
KRVC
KPAL
KTIA
KV
KJUS
KOMC
KTFN
KWBG
KTIP
KMPI
KSUM
KIRC
KE
KIPR
KWMN
KFRD
KSEP
KN
KOLY
KPKO
KIDE
KMRS
KFLU
KSAF
KGIC
KRAD
KU
KHLS
KOCI
KSTH
KS
KGHG
KAWC
KICC
KG
KSPR
KPRP
KDRG
KGIT
KVPR
KGCC
KSEO
KMCA
KSTC
KBIO
KHIV
KBCT
KPAI
KICA
KTDB
KACT
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KFLO
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPIN
KCOM
KESS
KDEV
KCFE
KNUC
KAWK
KPLS
KWWMN
KCIP
KPRV
KHDP
KTEX
KFIN
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KLIG
KMIG
KDDG
KRGY
KFSC
KR
KMOC
KPAONZ
KNAR
KIFR
KCGC
KID
KSAC
KAID
KNSD
KWMNCS
KCMR
KO
KNEI
KPOA
KTER
KOMS
KPAK
KTBT
KWMM
KWAC
KHSA
KX
KMFO
KPWR
KRIM
KSCI
KVRP
KENV
KCRCM
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
MARR
MX
MOPS
MNUC
MZ
MASS
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MIL
MTCRE
MCAP
MAS
MO
MTCR
MD
MK
MP
MY
MR
MT
MCC
MIK
MU
ML
MARAD
MA
MAPS
MV
MERCOSUR
MASC
MPOS
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MEPP
MRCRE
MEDIA
MAPP
MTRE
MEPN
MI
MC
MUCN
MAR
MASSMNUC
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
NATO
NL
NZ
NI
NU
NO
NPT
NRR
NA
NATIONAL
NIPP
NAFTA
NT
NS
NE
NASA
NSF
NP
NAR
NV
NORAD
NG
NSSP
NW
NK
NDP
NR
NATOPREL
NEW
NPA
NPG
NSG
NSFO
NGO
NSC
NH
NZUS
NC
OFDA
OTRA
OPRC
OIIP
OAS
OPDC
OVIP
OEXC
OPIC
OSCE
OPCW
OREP
OFFICIALS
ODIP
OECD
OMIG
OFDP
OBSP
OIE
OSCI
OES
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OIC
ON
OCII
OCS
OTR
OSAC
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PHUM
PA
PBTS
PINS
PM
PREF
PHSA
PK
POL
PL
PE
PFOR
PALESTINIAN
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNAT
PNR
PROP
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PSOE
PU
POGOV
PMIL
PINL
PHUMPREL
PGIV
PBT
PAK
PP
PGOC
PY
PLN
PMAR
PHUH
PBIO
PF
PRL
PG
PHUS
PTBS
PRAM
POV
PEL
PAS
POLICY
PGGV
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PSA
PDOV
PCI
PREO
PAHO
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPGOV
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PARMS
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PINF
PNG
RU
RS
RICE
RW
RCMP
RO
RFE
RP
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
REGION
RUPREL
RF
RELATIONS
RM
REACTION
ROOD
REPORT
RSO
RSP
SNAR
SENV
SOCI
SCUL
SY
SR
SU
SO
SP
SA
SZ
SF
SMIG
SW
SIPDIS
STEINBERG
SN
SNARIZ
SG
SNARN
SSA
SK
SI
SPCVIS
SOFA
SC
SL
SARS
SNARCS
SIPRS
SYR
SANC
SEVN
SWE
SHI
SEN
SHUM
SYRIA
SH
SPCE
SAARC
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
TW
TRGY
TU
TPHY
TBIO
TX
TN
TSPL
TC
TZ
TSPA
TS
TF
TI
TIP
TH
TINT
TNGD
TP
TD
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TL
TV
TT
TERRORISM
TR
THPY
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
UK
UP
US
UNSC
UNHCR
USEU
UNGA
UG
UY
UNESCO
UN
USTR
USOAS
UZ
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNHRC
UNDESCO
UNMIK
UNDP
UNC
UNO
UNAUS
UV
UNICEF
UNCHR
UNDC
UNCHC
UNPUOS
USUN
USNC
UNCSD
UNCND
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05WELLINGTON702, NZ ELECTIONS: WHAT'S IN IT FOR US?
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05WELLINGTON702.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05WELLINGTON702 | 2005-09-13 00:33 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | SECRET//NOFORN | Embassy Wellington |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
130033Z Sep 05
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000702
SIPDIS
NOFORN
STATE FOR D (FRITZ), EAP/ANP, EAP/RSP, EAP/EP, INR/EAP
NSC FOR VICTOR CHA AND MICHAEL GREEN
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISA LIZ PHU
PACOM FOR J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/11/2015
TAGS: PGOV PREL NZ
SUBJECT: NZ ELECTIONS: WHAT'S IN IT FOR US?
REF: A. WELLINGTON 696
¶B. WELLINGTON 695
¶C. WELLINGTON 682
¶D. WELLINGTON 635
¶E. WELLINGTON 594
¶F. WELLINGTON 566
Classified By: Charge D'Affaires David R. Burnett,
for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
¶1. (C) Summary: No matter who wins New Zealand's general
elections this Saturday, the stage is set for a comprehensive
U.S.-New Zealand dialogue should Washington desire one. Well
before the election, Labour officials indicated they would
welcome such an exchange, and even in coalition with the
Greens that position will not change. National would also
welcome a dialogue as a way to improve ties, although
ironically they would be less able to engage us publicly.
Labour, which would gain from close ties with us if in
Government, would in opposition win more by opposing
National's efforts to engage us. Embassy has had several
preparatory discussions with senior Foreign Affairs and
Defense officials to prepare for a dialogue should Washington
decide to move forward. End Summary.
--------------------------------
Dialogue with Labour Is Possible
--------------------------------
¶2. (C) New Zealand's closest general election campaign in a
decade is winding down. The stakes are high for the Kiwi
voter in this very close race: Labour and National represent
truly different policy choices. But the consequences for
U.S.-New Zealand relations may be less extreme: either party
should be open to new, comprehensive US-New Zealand talks if
Washington decides such a dialogue is in order. Either party
would also have to work around obstacles to pursue such
talks.
¶3. (C) As noted refs E and F, Labour has not been shy about
playing the anti-American card during this campaign. A
Labour-Green victory would not, however, preclude a
productive, comprehensive US-NZ dialogue as called for by
former Ambassador Swindells. Well before the campaign,
Labour officials had been quietly leaving themselves room for
such an exchange.
¶4. (C) There are many reasons for this. For all the Labour
Government's annoying tendencies to declare unilaterally that
the nuclear ban no longer matters to the United States, Prime
Minister Clark, Foreign Minister Goff and others recognize
the ban is an impediment to better relations with us and has
adverse effects on regional security. Obviously, their desire
for a free trade agreement is a motivating factor in
maintaining ties. But these leaders also recognize that
without a good relationship with the United States, the
Government is vulnerable to opposition charges that Labour is
too close to China and too far apart from New Zealand's
second largest trading partner. The opposition will only be
stronger in such attacks against a left-leaning, Labour-Green
alliance. Senior Government leaders also know -- more than
the Party caucus or backbenchers do -- that New Zealand
benefits from its remaining military and intelligence ties
with the United States. The country's engagements in
Afghanistan and in peacekeeping operations in which we
cooperate help keep their increasingly limited military
forces trained and ready. Without us, the defense force
would be almost totally reliant on Australia, and that
country makes no secret of its views that New Zealand is
shirking on defense. Labour's decision to sizably increase
defense spending was at least in part meant to demonstrate
that they intend to meet their obligations to us and other
partners.
¶5. (S) New Zealand also gains access to U.S. intelligence
concerning any country in which it has troops. As noted in
our "Two Worlds" cable, Prime Minister Clark continues to
guard this information jealously, the surest sign of its
value to her. The Greens have gone on record this campaign
as being opposed to our intelligence cooperation. But by
declaring they will automatically join Labour in a coalition,
they have lost their negotiating leverage to determine a role
in Government should Labour win. Clark will ensure that the
Greens are kept well away from foreign affairs, defense, and
intelligence matters should the Labour-Green coalition form
the government.
¶6. (C) Ambassador Swindells observed in his July 4 speech
that U.S. and New Zealand are drifting apart and that the
"status quo" of our relationship is meaningless in a changing
world. The Government was initially furious at his message,
but it also clearly touched a nerve, especially after a
surprising percentage of the public is still responding
positively to the speech months later. FM Goff, in his final
meeting with Ambassador Swindells (ref D) for the first time
did not rule out discussion of the anti-nuclear issue in a
comprehensive dialogue. He also told journalists waiting
outside the meeting room that the Government could support a
broad exchange with the United States: the first time a
Labour Government official had said this publicly. We have
noticed how, even in the midst of their anti-American
campaign rhetoric, senior Labour officials have checked in
with us to make sure we were not taking the language too
seriously. On the campaign trail, they also now talk of the
importance of maintaining New Zealand's anti-nuclear policy,
rather than using the word "legislation."
¶7. (C) This is of course not to say that Labour would be
willing to change either the anti-nuclear legislation or the
policy. Nor that the Greens won't affect the contour of our
dialogue in any way, or slow things down at times. But it
does seem that for the first time the Government appears to
want to keep the window open for a frank discussion of all
issues, including the ban and its implications for us in the
region. At a minimum, such a discussion would allow both
sides to explore other ways to work through some of the
problems that Labour's policies cause for us. Labour MPs on
the Foreign Affairs Select Committee and senior bureaucrats
in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade have also
responded positively, albeit quietly, to our calls for a
dialogue, and have said they wish to discuss things farther
after elections.
--------------------------------------
National: The Spirit is Willing, but...
--------------------------------------
¶7. (C) With National, the desire for good relations is
there, but the impediments to seeing things through are
possibly greater than for Labour. Well before the election
campaign kicked off, National's Foreign Affairs spokesman
Lockwood Smith and other senior National leaders told us that
it would be very difficult for National to convince New
Zealanders to consider amending the county's nuclear ban,
even though National believes that the propulsion ban should
go. During the campaign, Labour's claims that under Brash
the nuclear policy would be "gone by lunchtime" have caused
problems for National and proved Smith correct. Brash was
forced to say -- repeatedly -- that a National Government
would only change the policy following a referendum or having
been elected on a platform of making the change. Neither
possibility is in the offing, and National clearly could not
do anything on this issue in the near term. There is no
"Nixon goes to China" possibility for Brash to talk with us
openly about the ban's implications, the way there in theory
is for Clark, one of the legislation's authors.
¶8. (C) In fact, National's entire foreign policy has come
under scrutiny this election, and Labour has succeeded in
raising concerns in the minds of the electorate that National
has a "secret agenda" to once again make New Zealand what FM
Goff calls "a junior sheriff" to the United States and
others. Many National officials are committed to New
Zealand's multilateralist policies even as they wish for
closer relations with the United States. Because of this,
and because National is now vulnerable on all foreign policy
issues, the party's recently released foreign policy is very
conservative -- with a small "c." Indeed, it's hard to
differentiate it from Labour's current policies, a fact
trumpeted by the Government as proof of National's perfidy.
The policy paper signals to us just how hard it would be for
a National Government to engage in a high-profile dialogue
with the United States, at least over the shorter term.
Similarly, National's defense policy only commits to keeping
Labour's current plans and reviewing the country's overall
military needs. The Nats recognize that New Zealand's
defense forces have been drawn down so much over the past
decade that the Ministry of Defence will be unable, over the
shorter term, to absorb more that the extra NZD 4.3 billion
that Labour has already allocated for recruitment and
retention.
¶9. (C) The real difference between working with a National
Government and Labour would be the issue of trust. Even if
National could not change the nation's policies or openly
admit to talking about the nuclear ban and other security
issues with us, we very likely could quietly work on a "road
map" of sorts to try and align our policies more closely.
Over time, we could then build on that process to work
through many of the issues that divide our countries.
----------------------
The Role of Parliament
----------------------
¶10. (C) No matter who wins Saturday's election, we will need
to work with both the Government and opposition if we decide
to pursue a comprehensive dialogue with New Zealand. We have
already had several preparatory discussions with senior
Foreign Affairs and Defense officials, as well as key MPs, to
prepare for a dialogue should Washington decide to move
forward. A Labour government could probably count on an
opposition National to support such an initiative, but
engaging National would still be key to helping keep Labour
on track. Conversely, a National Government would be far
less likely to be able to count on an opposition Labour
party's support, as Labour's goals for closer relations with
us would be mooted outside Government. Nevertheless, Labour
foreign policy stalwarts are generally well disposed to us
and would likely respond to direct outreach on our part. We
will need to help all parties work around the likely
skepticism of their constituents, many of whom have
knee-jerk anti-American views. This includes maintaining the
Embassy's active public relations campaign to raise the case
for better U.S.-New Zealand relations. We've had surprising
success with this over the past years, but we need to keep up
the fight.
Burnett