

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09QUITO70, QUITO'S NEW AIRPORT MAKES PROGRESS BUT FACES BIG
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09QUITO70.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09QUITO70 | 2009-01-29 19:07 | 2011-05-02 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Quito |
VZCZCXYZ0032
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHQT #0070/01 0291928
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 291928Z JAN 09
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9971
INFO RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 7942
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 3365
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ JAN LIMA 3008
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL 4065
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC 0622
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
UNCLAS QUITO 000070
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EAIR EAID EINV ECIN EC MARR MCAP
SUBJECT: QUITO'S NEW AIRPORT MAKES PROGRESS BUT FACES BIG
CHALLENGES
REFTEL A: 07 Quito 2571
B: 07 Quito 181725Z
C: 08 Quito 986
D: 09 Quito 59
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The construction of Quito's new airport has made
significant progress. The project is large and complex, however,
dealing with an unpredictable political environment, sensitive
community relations, and environmental challenges. The builders
have made several recent missteps that attracted negative press
coverage and scrutiny from GOE officials. In addition, outstanding
elements like a municipal access road and a new public security
facility threaten to delay or otherwise disrupt the new airport's
opening in October 2010. End summary.
Construction Status
-------------------
¶2. (U) Quito's new airport is a massive project that covers 351
hectares and has a projected cost of roughly $600 million. The GOE
has been holding the land for this project since the 1980s but only
began construction in 2006. Since that date significant progress
has been made, and the project is now 42% complete. The builders
say that over 90% of the required materials have been purchased and
the initial earth works, which consisted of leveling the site
plateau for runways and buildings, are 91% complete. In addition,
the builders say that they have nearly finished pouring concrete for
the 38,000 square meter passenger terminals and the control tower.
They expect to complete the structured steel frames for the
terminals in February 2009. They point to progress installing
necessary infrastructure for telecommunications, electricity, water,
sewage, and rainwater drainage. The consortium has also nearly
completed the access road into the site. The builders say the
project is now mostly on schedule, with only slight delays in the
infrastructure elements, which they expect to correct in the next
few months.
¶3. (U) The Quito airport project has been controlled since 1999 by
the Quito municipality-controlled entity Corpaq, which signed a
concession with the Canadian Government entity Canadian Commercial
Corporation (CCC) to develop the airport. CCC in turn hired the
Quiport consortium to manage the current airport and build the new
one. Quiport is made up of Aecon (a Canadian company), Andrade
Gutierrez (Brazilian) and Houston Airport Systems (U.S.). The
project has financial backing from the U.S., Canadian, and
multilateral lenders OPIC, ExIm Bank, Inter-American Development
Bank, and Export Development Canada (Reftel A). The builders stress
that the project is following U.S. and Canadian labor and
environmental specifications, which has proved challenging in
Ecuador. Quiport acknowledges that there has been some friction
over meeting the lenders' expectations, but company representatives
say that they are committed to satisfying these requirements and say
that they have so far been able to sort out any disagreements.
Construction Progress and Dust Problems
-----------------------------------
¶4. (U) The project's most visible problem has been controlling the
large amounts of dust that the construction creates. On most days
the site throws up large clouds of brown dust that can be seen for
miles. This has sparked complaints from local farming communities
and has led to negative press coverage and criticism from
politicians as well as environmental and health experts. Quiport
says that much of the dust stems from the necessary earthworks. It
notes as well that the site's sandy, volcanic soil is difficult to
work with, and that construction delays have dragged out the
problem. Quiport initially budgeted $400,000 for dust control
measures, but the company has already spent over $2 million.
Quiport says that when asphalt is laid for the runways, grass is
planted, and water systems are installed, it should significantly
reduce the dust levels. Quiport is currently taking construction
bids and expects to begin laying down asphalt in June 2009. Company
officials say that most construction will be completed around the
end of 2009, and they plan to spend the first half of 2010 on
testing and certification of the new airport.
Public Stumbles
---------------
¶5. (SBU) Along with its handling of the dust clouds, Quiport has
been criticized by politicians and airlines for significantly
raising airport fees at the existing Mariscal Sucre airport to pay
for the new airport. Since 2006, airport departure fees have risen
from $25 to $40.80 on international flights, an increase of 63%. In
addition, it has raised the landing, parking and other fees that it
charges the airlines. Quiport recently attempted to improve its
public image with a series of glossy newspaper inserts touting the
benefits of the new airport. This effort was derailed, however, by
an announcement in November that Quiport planned once again to raise
departure fees to $44.30. The decision was announced without
consulting Quito Mayor Paco Moncayo, a prominent supporter of the
project. Moncayo sharply criticized the fee hike, and Ecuador's
Prosecutor General opened an investigation, leading Quiport to delay
indefinitely the increase.
¶6. (U) On January 6th, 2009, the Contraloria of Ecuador (similar to
the U.S. GAO) issued a report criticizing the project for cost
overruns. According to the Contraloria, the contracted cost for
constructing the terminals is $100 million more than appropriate,
and called for contracts to be renegotiated. It also criticized the
use of $15.7 million of GOE funds for an airport access road,
consulting, and reforestation, which it said should have been paid
by Quiport. Quiport declined to comment on the report, saying it
was directed at the government airport authority Corpaq.
Politicians seized on the report, however, saying that the cost
overruns were actually much higher and arguing that it justified
renegotiating the construction contract (Reftel D).
Access Road Could Hinder Airport Opening
----------------------------------------
¶7. (U) The new municipal road to the airport has the greatest
potential to cause major delays in the project. This road will be a
direct route from downtown Quito and should result in a travel time
of only 15 minutes. The road is the responsibility of the
municipality, however, and as of yet, no significant progress has
been made. Quiport officials say there is still sufficient time for
the road to be completed by October 2010, but this appears unlikely.
The land for the road is still not secured, and the city is still
reviewing construction bids for what most people expect to be a
complicated project involving the construction of three bridges
(Reftel B). There are also doubts about the municipality's ability
to pay for the project, although it does have support from the
Andean Development Fund (CAF). The existing route to the new
airport is a narrow and winding road that takes at least 45 minutes,
and much more during rush hour. Quiport officials say they would
consider delaying the airport's opening if the road is not completed
on time, since using the existing road would create significant
traffic and image problems.
Public Security Facility Could Also Cause Complications
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶8. (SBU) The public security facility (Armed Forces and Police) at
the new airport could also cause complications. The Ecuadorian
military needs to build the new facility. No work has been
completed so far, and additional delays will increase costs, since
it will require working around completed civilian structures. We
believe that the Ecuadorian military does not currently have the
funds to complete this project. Some have speculated that the
military could remain at the current airport, but for technical
flight reasons this is impossible (Reftel B). The military might be
able to relocate some of its assets to the airport in Latacunga,
which is roughly 90 minutes south of Quito. It is unclear if the
GOE, or international regulators would certify the airport if the
public security facility is not built, however, since it will house
the airport police.
U.S. Airlines Critical of the Project
-------------------------------------
¶9. (SBU) U.S. airlines complain that Quiport and the GOE have not
provided them with sufficient information about navigation aids and
flight patterns for operations at the new airport. Quiport and GOE
officials stress the benefits of the project, saying that it will be
a modern facility and will eliminate the hazards of landing planes
in a crowded urban center (Reftel A). Airline officials dispute
these claims, however, saying that the new airport's location is the
equivalent of taking of and landing "in a hole." They argue that
the new location will be far more challenging for their pilots and
will require expensive use of additional fuel. In addition, some
U.S. and international airlines have resisted paying the increased
airport fees, but lost their legal challenge to the fee increase
(Reftel C). American and Continental had been making their payments
to an escrow fund, but now are obliged to pay directly to Quiport,
although they characterize their payments as made "under protest."
Comment
-------
¶10. (SBU) The new Quito airport is one of the largest ongoing
foreign investments in Ecuador at this time. Under the best of
circumstances, large foreign investments face a number of
challenges, particularly in the regulated sectors. The Quito
airport project is an exception only in that it seems to face
criticisms and challenges from more quarters than most other
investments. That said, the project continues to move forward and
is less than two years from its scheduled opening.
Hodges