

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE497, U.S.-CHILEAN JOINT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSISTANCE LAUNCHES IN
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE497.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE497 | 2009-06-17 12:12 | 2011-03-21 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0497/01 1681235
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 171235Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0930
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 0461
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000497
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC:MROONEY AND AWONG, EEB/IFD/ODF
TREASURY FOR LMCDONALD, DVKOCH, AND SSENICH
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EFIN EINV PGOV PREL CS CI
SUBJECT: U.S.-CHILEAN JOINT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSISTANCE LAUNCHES IN
COSTA RICA
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. From May 18-21, a Treasury Department team from the Office of
Technical Assistance (OTA) met with Costa Rican government leaders
and private sector officials to consider how to meet Costa Rica's
national infrastructure challenges. The meetings represented the
first step of Treasury's and the Government of Chile's (GOC) joint
Infrastructure Finance Experts Corps (IFEC) project, which aims to
bring expert advice on financing, tendering, managing, and operating
infrastructure projects with an emphasis on public-private
partnerships (PPP). The two parties chose Costa Rica as a pilot
country for the project in late 2008. Three weeks after the OTA
team visit, a Chilean delegation -- plus two OTA Advisors --
conducted a two-day trip featuring meetings and a successful
half-day seminar on infrastructure PPPs.
¶2. After the week of OTA meetings, three areas for framing a
working relationship between the OTA, the GOC, and the GOCR emerged:
(1) identification of specific projects for OTA and GOC assistance
and delineation of specific roles for the OTA and the GOC; (2)
strengthening the work of the GOCR's Council of Concessions, a
multi-ministerial body charged with decision-making on
infrastructure projects; and (3) promoting the success of
concessions in Costa Rica, a country struggling to make strides in
implementing successful concession-driven infrastructure projects.
This "first draft" of work areas for the IFEC project in Costa Rica
will likely be revised as the initiative evolves. As a backdrop for
next steps, the Chilean seminar underscored key elements for
successful PPPs including legislative and contract flexibility,
dispute resolution, and liberating public resources. The OTA
anticipates a second visit with the Chileans in July to advance the
IFEC project. This unusual tri-national effort may prove to be an
important catalyst for developing Costa Rica's creaky
infrastructure. END SUMMARY.
--------------------------------------------- --
ACT ONE, SCENE ONE (THE OTA VISIT): THE PLAYERS
--------------------------------------------- --
¶3. OTA Advisors Harry Tether and Barry Gray traveled to Costa Rica
for four days of meetings commencing on May 18. Treasury Deputy
Assistant Secretary Larry McDonald joined for part of the visit.
The OTA team met with a wide variety of players in Costa Rican
infrastructure, including:
-- Guillermo Zuniga Chaves, Minister of Finance (Hacienda), Jose
Adrian Vargas, Treasurer, Juan Carlos Pacheco, Director, and Melvin
Quiros, Deputy Director, Public Credit, Hacienda;
-- Javier Cascante, Director, Superindentency of Pensions (SUPEN);
-- Ronald Vargas, Banco Nacional;
-- Jose Luis Valenciano (PLN), National Assembly member and Chairman
of the Finance Committee;
-- Rocio Aguilar, Contraloria (Comptroller) of the GOCR;
-- Guillermo Matamoros, Vice Minister of Concessions, and Pedro Luis
Castro, Vice Minister, MOPT Ministry of Public Works and
Transportation (MOPT);
-- Luis Gamboa (Vedova & Obando), President, and Lynda Solar,
Executive Director, Costa Rican-American Chamber of Commerce
(AmCham);
-- Charles Spalding (Trelex), Alonso Arroyo (KPMG), Jose Antonio
Munoz (Arias and Munoz), and William Merrigan (P&G), Board Members,
AmCham;
-- Jeff Scheferman, President/CEO, and Greg Huang, Vice President of
Finance, ADC/HAS (a U.S.-Canadian-Brazilian consortium vying to
purchase the operating and development rights to the San Jose
airport);
-- Eduardo Sibaja, Minister of Economy, Industry, and Commerce
(MEIC);
-- Ambassador Gonzalo Mendoza Negri and Esteban Cordova Tapia,
International Cooperation Counselor, Embassy of Chile;
-- Mariela Diaz, Director, and Cecilia Montero, Manager, ProChile;
-- Carlos Jaraquemada Valle, Administrative and Finance Director,
Antonio Alonso Jimenez, Project Director, Autopistas del Sol (a
Spanish-led consortium constructing and operating a highway
concession in San Jose);
-- Pedro Pablo Quiros, Chief Executive Officer, Instituto de
Costariccense Electricidad (ICE), the national electric and
telecommunications authority,
-- Rodolfo Lizano Rojas, Legal Director, AyA (the national water
authority); and
-- Fernando Quevado, Country Representative, InterAmerican
Development Bank.
-------------------------------------------
ACT ONE, SCENE ONE HIGHLIGHTS I: THUMBS UP
-------------------------------------------
¶4. MEIC Minister Sibaja concisely summarized the GOCR's challenge
with infrastructure: "We need to do concessions as we do not have
the resources in the government to fund infrastructure
improvements." The Minister noted the need to highlight concession
success given Costa Rica's history of failing to implement
concession projects without legal wrangling and/or a breakdown in
project execution. Though Costa has two successful concessions --
Puerto Caldera (the country's secondary port located on the
Pacific), and the newly-expanded San Jose-Caldera highway (a work in
progress) -- the general populace believes that concessions are a
troubled, if not doomed, process, based on experiences with the San
Jose airport, the Limon-Moin port, and a planned prison
privatization. Also, there is lingering suspicion, fueled by
opponents and especially the public sector unions, that concessions
represent a "give-away" of valuable public assets to the private
sector.
¶5. MOPT Vice Minister Matamoros welcomed the proposed IFEC process
by stating, "We (GOCR) need you to start yesterday." Matamoros also
made several observations about the concession process in Costa Rica
touching on the lack of expert capacity and problems with acquiring
materials; the grating differences between the operating speed of
the Costa Rican system (slow) and concessionaires (fast); the
potential of using bond funds for financing projects; and the need
for a better expropriation law for purchasing land. The meetings
with Autopistas del Sol (the Caldera highway concessionaire) and
ADC/HAS (poised to take over the languishing San Jose airport
project on July 1) confirmed many of the Vice Minister's
observations.
¶6. Minister Zuniga emphasized, as did DAS Treasury McDonald, Costa
Rica's need to follow the route of concessions, address the sluggish
pace of project implementation, find solutions to inter-governmental
coordination (including with the legislature and the Comptroller),
and improve ministerial capacity to evaluate projects. The Minister
expounded on the special challenges of the Council of Concessions, a
GOCR "inter-ministerial" board comprised of the Ministers of MOPT,
Hacienda and Planning; the President of the Central Bank; and the
Technical Society (private sector representatives). Participation
at Council meetings is erratic and there is scant lead time for
ministers to assess projects in advance.
---------------------------------------------
ACT ONE, SCENE ONE HIGHLIGHTS II: CHALLENGES
---------------------------------------------
¶7. Comptroller Aguilar occupies a controversial post in Costa Rica
as her office has grown into an increasingly (and perhaps overly)
powerful body in recent years. Appointed by the National Assembly,
the Comptroller
can both forecast a project's viability and later audit the same
project, but without responsibility of having to answer to the
(in)accuracy of the original forecast. That responsibility lies
with the "sponsoring" ministry, which in turn seeks to avoid
problems by deferring to the Comptroller's Office from the outset.
As other public officials told OTA and the Chileans, the Comptroller
thus accumulates decision-making authority for ministries by
default, since mid-level staffs willingly defer decisions to the
Comptroller to avoid responsibility for their own decisions (and
possible legal action against them).
¶8. Thus, the Comptroller operates as a shadow of the executive and
legislative branches, using its resident expertise in law,
engineering, auditing, finance, and public administration to
"legally" second guess either or both on decisions. Yet, the
Comptroller does not desire its now-elevated profile. Aguilar noted
that the Comptroller might be subject to "less criticism" if its
function were more operational and less focused on the evaluation of
program results.
¶9. Chilean Ambassador Mendoza voiced his exasperation with
governmental progress in Costa Rica, using both the CAFTA saga and
concessions as "poster child" examples. The Ambassador urged the
participants in IFEC to promote and publicize positive
infrastructure news. A similar challenge existed in Chile, he
explained, but the GOC steadfastly changed prevailing public opinion
through skillful public relations and successful project execution.
---------------------------------------------
ACT ONE, SCENE ONE HIGHLIGHTS III: FINANCING
---------------------------------------------
¶10. Ronald Vargas, Banco Nacional's (BNCR) investment bank
director, described the "fidiecomiso," or trust structure, for
creating public-private partnerships. For each project, BNCR
establishes a trust, which issues bonds on the local market,
purchases land, hires contractors, and constructs the capital asset.
The trust then leases the asset to a government agency. Once the
trust pays the bondholders, BNCR will dissolve the trust and
transfer the asset to an agency. As examples, Vargas cited two
successful power plant projects: Penas Blancas (USD 70 million),
near the Nicaraguan border, and Cariblanco (USD 170 million), in the
mountains northeast of San Jose. Both were built for the state-owned
Electrical Institute (ICE). The limited local capital market and
the Comptroller's initial skepticism towards the trust framework
represented two major challenges, however. Vargas believes that
project success established the credibility of the concept and
demonstrated how future projects can clear approval hurdles. (To
date, BNCR has financed four projects with the "fidiecomiso" scheme
valued at USD 295 million and has new project approvals valued at
USD 470 million).
¶11. SUPEN Director Cascante indicated that the Costa Rican capital
market can absorb future bond offerings. He supports the Pension
Funds' use of bonds issued by infrastructure trusts, underscoring
the Funds' growing financing potential manifested by annual
increases of USD 200-250 million. Pension funds can invest heavily
in trusts pioneered by BNCR's Ronald Vargas because those projects
are classified as "private" -- even though they finance
infrastructure that will become public once the trust pays off the
bonds. Costa Rican law limits the pension funds to invest 60
percent of their funds in GOCR bonds. There is no similar limit for
private bonds.
--------------------------------------------- ------
ACT ONE, SCENE TWO (THE CHILEAN VISIT): THE PLAYERS
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶12. Representatives from the GOC visited Costa Rica June 8-9 for
meetings and a half-day seminar. Treasury OTA Advisors Steven
Hochman and Jeanine Corvetto participated in both the meetings and
the seminar. Hosted by the Chilean Embassy and ProChile (a GOC
trade promotion agency), the Chilean Delegation included the
following:
-- Juan Eduardo Saldivia, Subsecretario, Ministerio de Obras
Publicas (MOP);
-- Leonel Vivallos, Coordinador de Concessiones, MOP;
-- Ivan Martens, Agencia de Cooperacion Internacional de Chile; and
-- Javier Hurtado, Director, Camara de la Construccion Chile.
As with the TREAS OTA team in May, the Chilean delegation and OTA
Advisors met VM Matamoros and Comptroller Aguilar. Additional
officials included Hacienda Vice Minister Jenny Phillips, Director
Randall Murillo and some ten members of the Chamber of Construction,
a Board member of the Council of Concessions, and a mayor of a city
adjacent to San Jose.
--------------------------------------------- ----
ACT ONE, SCENE TWO HIGHLIGHTS I: SEMINAR SUCCESS
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶13. At the June 9 seminar, the Chilean delegation highlighted for
the 70-member audience Chile's impressive PPP accomplishments across
a diverse range of projects, including highways, airports, stadiums,
prisons, public buildings, and intermodal transfer stations. Key
recommendations included legislative and contract flexibility,
guaranteed financing, practical regulations, creditor protection,
agreement on risk assignment, and a dispute resolution process.
Repeatedly, the delegation stressed the concession advantage as
increasing competiveness and productivity, liberating public
resources (for social investment), and spurring private sector
innovation. Under the rubric of IFEC, the Chileans want to make a
difference and project their success elsewhere in the Americas.
¶14. The OTA Advisors presented both the advantages and
disadvantages of PPPs when compared to traditional approaches while
noting how PPPs are an important additional tool for developing
infrastructure. They also noted the importance of achieving an
appropriate allocation of risk between the public and private
partners when creating a PPP.
---------------------------------------------
ACT ONE, SCENE TWO HIGHLIGHTS II: CHALLENGES
---------------------------------------------
¶15. In meetings with the Comptroller and the GOC, the two OTA
Advisors concluded that the Comptroller's Office takes a more
skeptical view of the concessions/PPP approach than does the Finance
Ministry, a possible source of friction as the IFEC initiative
develops. Also, in the mayoral meeting, we learned that the
municipal sector sorely lacks the resources for infrastructure
development and thus welcomes the PPP approach as an opportunity to
bolster public services.
-----------------------------------
ACT ONE, BOTH SCENES: THE PRODUCERS
-----------------------------------
¶16. Treasury OTA found supporting funds for the OTA's participation
in IFEC within Treasury. The Chileans dedicated funds to support
their part of the program, independent of U.S. funds. In
anticipation of the project moving forward, the Chileans started
working with VM Matamoros well in advance of the OTA visit to Costa
Rica.
--------
COMMENTS
--------
¶17. The OTA team and the Embassy identified three near- term issues
for future meetings and work: (1) collaborating with the GOCR to
select specific IFEC project(s) and define specific areas of focus
for the IEFC team; (2) increasing the effectiveness of the Council
of Concessions; and (3) publicizing concession and public-private
partnership successes. The Chilean emphasis on how to structure
successful PPPs, while acknowledging problems, can provide vital,
practical, and experience-based assistance to the GOCR and its
turgid legal and governing system. The generally positive GOCR view
of Chile as a model to emulate in many areas may also help.
¶18. On the other hand, the messy business of inter-ministerial and
inter-agency coordination in Costa Rica -- with the Comptroller's
Office in a pivotal and disproportionately powerful position --
remains an exogenous drag on any public works project, with or
without PPPs. Throw in the Comptroller's protracted and excessively
deliberative due diligence, which is compounded by Costa Rica's
hyper-legalism and penchant for "perfect consensus," and systemic
solutions become daunting and elusive. Nevertheless, we view IFEC
as one promising solution to Costa Rica's infrastructure woes.
CIANCHETTE