

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08REYKJAVIK286, Iceland: Political parties considering EU membership as
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08REYKJAVIK286.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08REYKJAVIK286 | 2008-12-05 16:04 | 2011-01-13 05:05 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Reykjavik |
VZCZCXRO9749
PP RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN
RUEHLZ RUEHNP RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSK RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHRK #0286/01 3401628
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 051628Z DEC 08
FM AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3912
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 REYKJAVIK 000286
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL ECON EUN IC
SUBJECT: Iceland: Political parties considering EU membership as
economic salve
Ref: Reykjavik 267
¶1. (U) Summary: Iceland's economic crisis has radically changed
opinions here on the possibility of joining the European Union, and
the country's political parties are struggling to adapt. Polls show
support for joining the EU and adopting the euro reaching 70
percent, while support for the government has fallen below 50
percent. Apart from the Foreign Minister's (pro-EU) Social
Democratic Alliance, all other parties are debating whether and how
to add EU membership to their platforms. For the Prime Minister's
Independence Party, fears of a formal split are running high, while
in the opposition Progressives, the iconic chairman of the party has
already resigned over the issue. Even the staunchly nationalist
Left-Greens are rethinking their views to retain their base of youth
support. Decisive party congresses for the IP and PP are slated for
January 2009, meaning that even if new (anti-EU) parties do not
emerge, Iceland will have a dramatically reshaped political
landscape by next spring. End summary.
¶2. (U) The debate on the merits of joining the European Union (EU)
has become increasingly pronounced after the global credit crunch
hit Iceland, the currency devalued sharply and the government
nationalized the country's three major banks in October. Opinion
polls in the last month show 60-70 percent of respondents in favor
of EU accession, and similar support for adopting the euro. Compared
with polls last year, support for membership has increased about
15-25 percentage points. In the business community, support for EU
membership is even stronger, with almost all holding to the view
that Iceland's road to salvation will only run through Brussels and
adoption of the euro (reftel).
¶3. (U) Olli Rehn, the European Commissioner for Enlargement, has
frequently been asked over the past couple of years how long it
would take Iceland to become an EU member after filing the
application. His answers have always been positive, and in the past
several weeks, the media has placed more emphasis on his comments in
light of the financial crisis and speculations regarding Iceland's
possible EU membership. Rehn has stated that the European Economic
Area (EEA) agreement would serve as a shortcut in accession
negotiations for Iceland. He has also said that Iceland could well
compete with Croatia for becoming the twenty-eighth member of the
union, which suggests that Iceland could become a member no later
than 2011, if Iceland decided to apply for membership soon. In
addition, various EU officials have made it clear that if Iceland
wants to adopt the euro, it has to become a member of the EU first.
¶4. (U) Against this backdrop, Iceland's political parties -- both
government and opposition -- are scrambling to adapt their policies
on EU membership for Iceland. For some (Independence and
Left-Greens), this is a fundamental change in orthodoxy, while for
others (Social Democrats and Progressives) a move to Brussels will
simply confirm or codify existing trends.
The Government -- divided over EU membership
--------------------------------------------
¶5. (U) Prime Minister Haarde's Independence Party (IP) has been the
largest party in Iceland and a participant in most governments since
the establishment of the republic in 1944. As such, it has virtually
dictated Icelandic foreign policy, been a fervent advocate of NATO
membership and strong transatlantic ties, yet been skeptical about
European integration. The IP still maintains this position, but
after the financial crisis hit Iceland, many party members
(including the IP Vice Chair and at least one other minister) have
come forth and said that the party should reconsider its position
towards joining the EU and adopting the euro. Notably, even Minister
of Fisheries and Agriculture Einar K. Gudfinnsson said in an October
interview that all possibilities should be considered at this time,
although he also reiterated his opposition to EU membership. (Note:
Gudfinnsson is one of the strongest historical opponents of joining
the EU, in part due to concerns over the EU's Common Fisheries and
Agriculture Policies. End note.) These calls reflect the IP's
strong support among the business community, which has already made
clear its desire to abandon the Icelandic krona for another currency
(with the euro the most likely candidate).
¶6. (SBU) On November 14, the IP leadership made a historic and
significant decision when they announced that they had appointed a
committee to discuss EU membership, and that the results would be
presented to the party general meeting, which will be held in
January next year (vice October 2009 as previously scheduled).
Several days before this announcement, the IP's General Secretary
told PolOff that the party recognized the need to respond to growing
public support for EU membership, but that the result would have to
be something "credible" in order for the IP to regain public
support. With leadership elections also on the agenda in January,
the party meeting could develop into a true showdown over the IP's
future course. Many fear the result will be a split or large-scale
defections by the anti-EU group; Central Bank Chair (and former
Prime Minister and IP Chairman) David Oddsson gave credence to these
REYKJAVIK 00000286 002 OF 003
fears with a November 30 interview in a Danish newspaper where he
said he would re-enter politics should he be fired from the Central
Bank.
¶7. (U) The other member of the governing coalition, Foreign
Minister Gisladottir's Social Democratic Alliance (SDA), is the only
political party whose platform openly calls for EU membership.
However, prior to the economic crisis, polls showed most Icelandic
voters as skeptical towards EU membership, leading the SDA to
minimize this plank. In the changed conditions here, however, the
SDA is now well prepared for the EU membership debate ahead given
its long-standing pro-EU policy. The SDA firmly believes that EU
membership is vital for Iceland to reach and maintain economic
stability in the long run. FM Gisladottir and other SDA ministers
have used the crisis as an opportunity to make these points
forcefully, at times even doing so while sharing a press conference
podium with PM Haarde.
The Opposition: Coalescing around an EU bid?
--------------------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) Like the IP, the Left-Green Movement (LGM) has always been
an anti-EU party. The LGM emphasizes an independent Icelandic
foreign policy that maintains the sovereignty of Iceland and
supports all means of establishing global peace. The party rejects
participation in the EU and emphasizes simple, bilateral treaties
concerning trade and co-operation. However, due to the economic
situation and polls showing that a number of LGM voters also favor
EU membership and adoption of the euro, the LGM may need to adapt
itself to the current situation. This is not entirely new -- the
party's Deputy Chair told PolOff in spring 2008 that as the krona
grew weaker, many in the party were concluding that EU membership
might be the only realistic choice. Despite LGM Chair Steingrimur
Sigfusson's visceral opposition to EU membership, signs suggest he
may be increasingly isolated. At the outset of the crisis in
October, the youth wing of the party announced it was formulating a
new policy on the EU instead of simply copying the policy of the
mother party. Even one of Sigfusson's longtime ideological allies,
Chairman of the LGM parliamentary group Ogmundur Jonasson, said that
the party will soon discuss the possibility of putting EU accession
talks on the agenda and holding a referendum on EU membership
(despite also reiterating his personal opposition to EU
membership).
¶9. (SBU) For the Progressive Party (PP), the EU membership debate
has sparked the third leadership crisis in just over two years.
Former Prime Minister and Chair of the Progressive Party (PP)
Halldor Asgrimsson tried to modernize the traditionally agrarian
party by appealing to urban voters, and flirting with a more pro-EU
policy. Asgrimsson's strategy failed, as confirmed by stinging
losses in 2006's municipal elections and 2007's parliamentary
elections. After the 2007 defeat, former Minister of Agriculture
Gudni Agustsson took over as party chair, and unsuccessfully
attempted to gain support by reverting to a more traditional PP
policy appealing to rural interests. As calls here to consider
joining the EU increased, internal tensions came to a head at a
biannual meeting of the party's central committee on November 15,
where the party's youth wing led harsh criticism of the leadership
and called for EU accession to be clearly placed on the party's
agenda. The party moved up its general meeting to January to vote on
new leadership and the EU question. Two days later, PP Chair
Agustsson stunned political circles by announcing his resignation as
chairman and MP, saying he was stepping aside to allow the party to
reconcile and move ahead. Agustsson's resignation clears the biggest
hurdle to a solid pro-EU position for the PP. Most believe that the
party is desperately in need of new, younger leadership, though no
strong candidates have emerged thus far. However, a reinvented,
solidly pro-EU Progressive Party might be a more attractive
coalition possibility for the SDA, should the current government
crumble.
¶10. (U) The current stance of the Liberal Party (LP) is a bit
murkier compared to the other parties, but given that it is an
idiosyncratic party founded on one issue --opposition to the current
system of fisheries management --the party is wary of EU membership
as long as its Common Fisheries Policy remains unchanged. The party
is currently gauging the views of party members towards the EU and
is expected to update its policy platform accordingly.
¶11. (SBU) Comment: By putting possible EU membership on their
agendas, the parties are now trying to adapt their policies to
reflect public will and grab more of what looks like a very volatile
electorate. While a larger share of voters wants to drop the
Icelandic krona and adopt the euro as soon as possible, control over
fishing grounds is still seen as an integral part of the Icelandic
independence struggle and economic sovereignty. The IP and the PP
seem to have realized that sacrificing this sacred cow, as well as
agriculture, may be a necessary evil in order to stabilize the
Icelandic economy for the long run. If the old guard holds sway
among the Left-Greens, they may turn out to be the only remaining
anti-EU party, and might attract a new base of anti-EU voters.
REYKJAVIK 00000286 003 OF 003
However, a more likely scenario might be the emergence of new
centrist or center-right parties based on opposition to EU
membership, particularly if the IP meeting in January turns bitter.
Regardless, by next spring we will likely see a wholescale
realignment of the political spectrum here. End Comment.
VAN VOORST