

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON69, TAXES, LAW AND ORDER TOP KEY'S LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON69.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON69 | 2009-03-10 02:02 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO4651
RR RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0069/01 0690226
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 100226Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5790
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1931
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5470
RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA 0547
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0810
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000069
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KCRM KDEM NZ
SUBJECT: TAXES, LAW AND ORDER TOP KEY'S LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
WELLINGTON 00000069 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) Summary. Prime Minister John Key was quick to enact his
initial legislative agenda after coming to power following the 2008
election. As Key had promised prior to the election, his Government
swiftly passed a tax cut package and a series of stronger law and
order measures. The National-led Government also moved rapidly to
unwind aspects of the previous Labour administration's more
unpopular legislative legacy. Key has been bound by agreements with
minor support parties to introduce or address some contentious
legislation, such as the proposed "three strikes" bill and review of
the Foreshore and Seabed Act. With its clear parliamentary
majority, the Government's legislative program in its first 100 days
progressed comfortably through Parliament. His legislative program
over the medium term is unlikely to yield any surprises. End
Summary.
First Up: Tax Relief
--------------------
¶2. (SBU) Prime Minister John Key's top legislative objective was to
quickly pass into law a tax relief package before the Christmas
recess, in keeping with a promise made during the election
campaign. The tax cut legislation, which also included changes to
the KiwiSaver pension scheme, was comfortably passed on December 11.
The legislation stipulates that the first round of cuts will come
into effect on April 1 2009, with subsequent rounds in 2010 and
¶2011. Despite calls from the opposition Labour Party to suspend the
2009 round on the grounds that the country cannot afford tax cuts in
the current economic climate, Key remains committed to his promise.
Key, however, is unwilling to give a categorical assurance that tax
cuts promised for 2010 and 2011 will go ahead. (Note: If the
Government wishes to defer or abolish future tax cuts it will have
to change its own legislation. End Note).
Early Focus on Law and Order Legislation
----------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) Strengthened law and order measures have featured
prominently in the Government's first 100 days legislative program.
Key's pre-election position on introducing tougher law and order
measures proved extremely popular with voters anxious about the
rising crime rate under Labour. The Government quickly introduced
legislation to remove the right of the worst repeat violent
offenders to be released on parole. It toughened the bail laws to
make it harder for criminals awaiting trial to get bail. The
Government also moved quickly to bring in legislation to require DNA
testing for every person arrested for an imprisonable offence.
Current Draft of Three Strikes Bill Faces Hurdles
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶4. (SBU) Under its obligation in the supply and confidence
agreement with the hard-right ACT Party, the Government introduced
the controversial Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill. The proposed
legislation, a key ACT Party policy, is a "three strikes and you're
out" measure. It would see those convicted of a third serious
offence sentenced to life imprisonment with a 25-year non-parole
period. National has reserved judgment on whether it will support
the legislation further. Evidence is mounting that the Bill may not
proceed as drafted. Chris Finlayson, in his capacity as
Attorney-General, has found the three-strikes bill has an "apparent
inconsistency" with the section of New Zealand's Bill of Rights
protecting New Zealanders against cruel, degrading or
"disproportionately severe" punishment. Additionally, the Maori
Party, another Government support partner, has come out against the
bill in the belief that the legislation would lead to
disproportionate sentencing. The Maori Party also believes that the
Bill may have a particularly destructive effect on Maori families,
many of whom face a greater chance of having a family member
imprisoned because of the higher rate of Maori criminal recidivism.
¶5. (SBU) In its March 6 editorial, The New Zealand Herald called
the three-strikes policy flawed as a means of lowering the crime
rate and called for the legislation's rejection by a parliamentary
select committee. The newspaper urged the Government to fine-tune
its law and order policy to find "the right balance between
punishing criminals, safeguarding society from those who present too
great a risk and providing rehabilitation carrots."
Three Strikes Bill Generates Prison Funding Debate
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶6. (SBU) The cost of implementing the three strikes legislation has
also become a source of debate. Although the Government has not
released any figures surrounding the cost of implementing the
WELLINGTON 00000069 002.2 OF 003
legislation, the advocacy group Rethinking Crime and Punishment Now
estimated the cost of implementation (based on its the prediction
that new prisons will have to be subsequently constructed to house
greater inmate numbers) at around NZD 7.5 billion over 25 years, and
an ongoing extra operational cost at NZD 1 billion a year. Key,
however, disputed these figures. He argued that the Bill will not
necessarily effect a increase in near term prison numbers, as the
law change would not be retrospective and by the time an offender
was going to jail for a serious offence for a third time they would
already be getting a long sentence. Said Key, "(offenders) can't
just get put away for stealing chewing gum, they have to have a
conviction for a serious offence." The Government is, however,
presently considering allowing private-sector operational management
of some New Zealand prisons.
GNZ to Review Controversial Foreshore Law
----------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) As part of National's confidence and supply agreement with
the Maori Party, Key will establish a three-person panel to complete
a ministerial review of the controversial Foreshore and Seabed Act
by July 2009. For the Maori Party, the Foreshore and Seabed Act is
critical. The Act was passed by the Labour Government in 2004 and
confirmed Crown ownership of New Zealand's foreshore and seabed in
perpetuity. As a result, tens of thousands of Maori marched on
parliament in protest against the law which was viewed by many as a
"land grab," taking away private land and customary rights from
Maori. Then-Labour MP Tariana Turia left the party in protest at
the legislation and formed the Maori Party. The Maori Party will
not be satisfied unless the Foreshore and Seabed Act is repealed.
Even before coming power, Key recognized the Maori Party's concerns
over the Act and had promised to undertake a review of law. The
National Party, however, remains committed to its position that it
would only agree to the Act's repeal if there were appropriate
protection in place to ensure all New Zealanders enjoy access to the
foreshore and seabed, either through existing and potentially new
legislation.
Unwinding Controversial Labour Legislation
------------------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) The Key administration has moved quickly to address some
controversial laws enacted or strengthened under the previous Labour
government. National swiftly repealed the highly controversial
Electoral Finance Act (EFA) passed in 2007 to establish strict laws
governing financial contributions to politics. The EFA prompted the
most acrimonious debate in modern New Zealand politics with
then-Labour Prime Minister Helen Clark accused of advancing the
legislation for her party's own narrow political purposes.
Paradoxically, Clark's successor as Labour Party leader and early
backer of the EFA, Phil Goff, expressed regret for the law's
enactment and ordered his MPs to vote for its repeal. Out of the
122 MPs, only the nine Green Party members voted against the repeal.
¶9. (SBU) National also moved promptly to address an existing law
which was controversially strengthened under the Clark
administration, the Resource Management Act (RMA). The RMA was
introduced in 1991 to oversee building and development projects from
those of national significance down to local council plans and small
scale building on individual properties. Under Clark, the law was
extended to increase regulation which, inadvertently, invited a rash
of frivolous objections to developments. Prior to the election, Key
had called the RMA a "handbrake on growth." He quickly introduced
legislation to reform the RMA to create greater certainty around
developments and stalled projects, and to "unlock that lost growth
potential and untangle the red tape suffocating everyone from
homeowners to business." Part of the newly proposed legislation to
reform the RMA involves the establishment of a new Environmental
Protection Authority to expedite consents for major building and
infrastructure projects.
Comment
-------
¶10. (SBU) The Key administration's legislative agenda in its first
100 days progressed through parliament with little disruption. This
was largely due to its clear voting majority provided by National's
support parties and popular public support for the proposed
legislation, all of which was well-telegraphed in advance. However,
having exhausted his campaign legislative promises Key has not
clearly stated what his legislative program will look like in the
near term. Differences over the three-strikes legislation will test
the National's relationship with ACT and the Maori Party, but it
will not derail the Government's hard-hitting law and order program.
WELLINGTON 00000069 003.2 OF 003
Additionally, the Foreshore and Seabed Act review may further test
the National-Maori Party relationship, but not likely to the extent
of causing it significant harm. Key has proved to be a pragmatic
consensus-builder and looks fully capable of weathering encroaching
legislative storms. End Comment.
Keegan