

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06HELSINKI696, EU-US INFORMAL SENIOR-LEVEL MEETING ON JUSTICE AND HOME
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06HELSINKI696.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06HELSINKI696 | 2006-07-21 12:12 | 2011-04-24 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Helsinki |
VZCZCXRO7598
RR RUEHAST
DE RUEHHE #0696/01 2021228
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 211228Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY HELSINKI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2195
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RHEFHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HELSINKI 000696
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SNAR PREL PGOV CVIS CPAS KCRM KFRD SMIG EUN FI
SUBJECT: EU-US INFORMAL SENIOR-LEVEL MEETING ON JUSTICE AND HOME
AFFAIRS COOPERATION
HELSINKI 00000696 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY. The U.S. and EU, under the chair of the Finnish
Presidency, met in Helsinki on July 18 for the Informal Senior Level
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) Meeting. Led by Acting INL DAS
Elizabeth Verville, DOJ liaison to USEU Mark Richard, and DHS Acting
A/S for Policy Development Paul Rosenzweig, USDEL continued its
ongoing dialogue on issues related to counterterrorism, law
enforcement, border security and migration. USDEL emphasized the
importance of building upon existing cooperation and improving
coordination, most notably to ensure a continuous flow of
information between respective law enforcement agencies. In this
regard, both sides welcomed the progress in negotiations for an
agreement between the U.S. and Eurojust, as well as the final
signature on the bilateral protocols that once ratified will enable
the implementation of the U.S.-EU Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) and
Extradition Treaties. In addition, EU representatives confirmed that
the passarelle option would be pursued under the Finnish Presidency
and expressed hope that a final decision could be taken by December,
which would thereby change decision making on justice related
issues. USDEL thanked the EU for receipt of its proposal for a
revised Passenger Name Record (PNR) agreement and welcomed future
discussions. EU participants stressed the urgency to come to an
agreement to cover the interim period, September 30, 2006 - November
2007, before a new agreement could be concluded. Lastly, EU reps
requested the U.S. confirm a date for the U.S.-EU JHA
Ministerial-Troika, proposed for November 6 in Washington. It was
also suggested to hold the JHA High Level Policy Dialogue on Border
and Transport Security (PDBTS) on the margins of the Ministerial
meeting. END SUMMARY.
Counterterrorism and Security
------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) EU reps provided a status report on the implementation of
the EU Counterterrorism (CT) Strategy. While the EU is making
progress on biometric requirements for passports, development of the
Schengen Information System (SIS) II is facing technical
difficulties and will likely not be ready by the April 2007
deadline. In response to a U.S. request for direct access for third
countries to SIS II data, the EU stated it would be difficult to
allow such access for political reasons, although there would be no
technical impediments to sharing. However, the EU is currently
exploring whether the Interpol database system could serve as an
alternative with respect to sharing of specific categories of data.
The European Commission (Commission) also reported it has been
consulting with private sector stakeholders on critical
infrastructure protection and on the development of detection
technologies in the field of CT. On the latter initiative, the
Commission will publish a green paper this summer and welcomes U.S.
input. In regards to the misuse of charities, the EU has held
discussions with the nonprofit sector, but indicated that it does
not intend to pursue a legislative approach at this stage as a way
to prevent terrorist support being accomplished via such charities.
¶3. (SBU) U.S. and EU participants agreed on the importance of
coordinating with G8 CT initiatives and of promoting further
research on terrorist's misuse of the Internet in order to tackle
radicalization and recruitment. Richard stressed the importance of
also focusing on operational issues in addition to concentrating on
public diplomacy initiatives. The Commission noted that an EU
delegation visited Washington on July 17 for consultations on the
EU's project to develop a non-emotive lexicon. The EU is also
establishing an expert advisory group that will issue two reports,
one on the state of current research on radicalization due in
November, and a second report on the phenomenon as such, which is
due to be released in January 2007. A/S Rosenzweig briefly
described DHS efforts in this area, including DHS Science and
Technology's research programs and civil integration initiatives in
Citizen and Immigrant Services and suggested that both sides
coordinate efforts to avoid unnecessary duplication.
¶4. (SBU) EU representatives stressed the importance of recent
dialogue with regard to human rights and terrorism, emphasizing the
importance of POTUS statements at the June Summit on the intention
to close the Guantanamo detention facility and the recent Supreme
Court ruling on military tribunals to try enemy combatants. USDEL
clarified that the Supreme Court ruling established Article III of
the Geneva Convention as being applicable to enemy combatants and
ruled that the system of military tribunals is inconsistent with
U.S. law, which is being addressed by Congress.
¶5. (U) Under this item, USDEL also introduced Jane Horvath, DOJ's
recently appointed Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer. She
provided EU delegates with an overview of the data protection model
in the U.S. government. In particular, she highlighted the focus on
the protection of privacy in the Administration's information
sharing efforts. [NOTE: On the margins, EU participants seemed very
eager to learn more about Horvath's function within the U.S. system,
HELSINKI 00000696 002.2 OF 003
particularly as it related to data protection and oversight. For
example, Eurojust extended an invitation for Horvath to brief the
organization on the Administration's data protection efforts.
Europol requested a copy of her office's upcoming, statutorily
mandated report. The EU Council Secretariat representative made
comparisons with Horvath regarding U.S. data protection and EU data
protection. He indicated a desire to learn more. END NOTE]
Justice and Law Enforcement Issues
----------------------------------
¶6. (SBU) Both sides praised the recent breakthrough in negotiations
for a U.S.-Eurojust agreement, and highlighted the possibility of a
signing ceremony at the U.S.-EU Ministerial in Washington this
November. Eurojust also indicated its intention to circulate a
questionnaire that once completed would assist in further
discussions on the use of intelligence in criminal proceedings. In
addition, with the final signature on the bilateral protocols of the
U.S.-EU Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) and Extradition Treaties, the
EU and U.S. agreed that training would be critical to ensure proper
and timely implementation, especially of the banking provision, and
should not wait until ratifications are complete.
¶7. (SBU) Europol also noted that three countries had yet to ratify
the third protocol to the Europol Convention, which would allow U.S.
access to Europol's analytical case files thereby increasing the
depth of operational cooperation. Europol indicated that it would
reach out to these remaining countries and USDEL indicated its
intention to do so as well. USDEL also highlighted the need to work
out processes for receiving requests from Europol as U.S. officials
based in Europol had yet to develop a solid relationship with their
Europol counterparts.
¶8. (SBU) In regard to the UN Convention against Corruption,
Verville highlighted ongoing discussions in advance of the
Conference of the States Parties (COSP) scheduled for December 2006
and stressed the importance of examining the core provisions,
including criminalization, international cooperation and asset
recovery. While monitoring would need to be looked at, Verville
noted that a solid base for implementation must first be
established. The Finnish rep expressed a preference to focus first
on a monitoring mechanism.
¶9. (SBU) In relation to the Balkans, USDEL noted that the draft
charter for SECI contained stringent data protection provisions that
would prevent cooperation with the U.S. EU reps indicated that a
second version is still in the drafting stages and offered no
further information. On counter-narcotics issues in Afghanistan, EU
reps reacted cautiously to a U.S. proposal for Member States to use
the 1988 UN Drug Convention as the basis for extradition of drug
traffickers as they foresaw problems related to jurisdiction in such
cases. Eurojust agreed to take the issue back to The Hague and
report the proposal to its members, getting back to the U.S. as soon
as possible.
¶10. (SBU) The EU reported that progress had been slow on the EU
draft Data Protection Framework Decision, but hoped to complete it
by end of this year. EU reps refused to comment on how this
Framework Decision could affect information sharing with third
country law enforcement, or how or whether existing agreements would
be preserved. Rosenzweig also highlighted for the EU that a vast
majority of current law enforcement cooperation is conducted
informally and outside the framework of formal agreements. The
Finns also indicated that they will be moving forward on the
passarelle option as a way to improve decision-making on justice and
police matters and hoped for a decision by December. Under this
option, unspecified justice issues would be moved from consensus
decision making by Member States (Third Pillar) to qualified
majority voting (First Pillar). Significantly, they would
thereafter fall within the ambit of the current Pillar One Data
Protection Directives, as well as Parliament involvement in any
proposed legislation.
¶11. (SBU) Finally, USDEL informed EU reps that the U.S. would soon
be placing an intellectual property (IP) enforcement coordinator in
Eastern Europe, in addition to placing permanent IP attaches in
select Embassies and Consulates. USDEL also provided an overview of
a meeting between FBI and the European Police College (CEPOL) to
discuss potential avenues of cooperation. The Commission emphasized
that cooperation with the U.S. would have to be approved by the
Council.
Migration, Borders and Visa Issues
----------------------------------
¶12. (SBU) USDEL thanked the EU for receipt of the EU's proposal for
a revised PNR agreement and welcomed future discussions. EU
participants stressed the urgency to come to an agreement to cover
the interim period, September 30, 2006 - November 2007. In addition,
HELSINKI 00000696 003.2 OF 003
EU reps noted that some Member States will need to invoke
Constitutional procedures to ratify a new agreement, which might not
happen until 2007. The EU hoped, but could not guarantee, that all
Member States could put an agreement into immediate effect on a
provisional basis, pending ultimate parliamentary endorsement.
¶13. (SBU) The Commission delegation noted that the release of their
latest report on visa reciprocity would likely be delayed until
September.
¶14. (SBU) Rosenzweig urged EU Member States to share lost and
stolen passport (LASP) data with Interpol and suggested that they
confiscate LASPs when found at borders - as the US is doing.
Frelick (State/CA) provided a progress report on administering U.S.
e-passports. In addition, the EU provided a brief overview of
FRONTEX, which was established to facilitate operational cooperation
at EU external borders. EU reps noted that FRONTEX was seeking to
establish working relationships with third countries and had thus
far reached out to Russian Border Guards. Rosenzweig indicated DHS
interest in working cooperatively, particularly on best practices,
and invited further discussion. Rosenzweig also discussed
developing aviation entry/exit screening in light of a possible
pandemic to avoid stopping all international travel, and asked the
EU to consider working with us to develop a common set of protocols
or standards. The EU reps cautioned that data protection would need
to be addressed before such cooperation could ensue which might
include any effort to identify individual travelers.
Other Issues
------------
¶15. (SBU) At the end of the meeting, German Director General Gunter
Krause questioned when the Finnish Presidency would conduct the
expert group meeting, as indicated in the May 4, Vienna communiqu,
to discuss the future EU-U.S.-Russian tripartite cooperation and
make recommendations for the German Presidency. Verville inquired
as to what topics the EU/Presidencies had in mind, as well as the
advantages and recommendations of such a dialogue. Verville
suggested that the U.S. and EU discuss respective bilateral
cooperation with Russia in advance of conducting a meeting that
included other countries. She also added that while the U.S.
remained open to the concept, she was not in a position to put forth
any suggestions as the U.S. had not yet identified discussion topics
that would achieve concrete benefits. The EU Presidency agreed with
Verville's summation and suggestion. [NOTE: On the margins of the
dinner, Krause, sensing a lack of enthusiasm from Finland or in
Germany raised with Verville and Rosenzweig an uncleared proposal to
continue the four Presidency-U.S.-Russian dialogue by, in essence,
expanding the tripartite meeting with Russia to include Azerbaijan,
Armenia, Moldova and Georgia. In response to Verville's question as
to what they would expect to raise/achieve in such an expanded
meeting, Krause said he was looking for answers, but did not have
one himself. Krause said they would await an answer/reaction from
the U.S., and Verville replied that such an answer would be
facilitated by knowing what they had in mind by way of an agenda and
outcomes. END NOTE]
¶16. (U) The U.S. delegation included: Elizabeth Verville, State
Acting INL DAS; Paul Rosenzweig, DHS Acting A/S for Policy
Development; Mark Richard, DOJ Liaison to USEU; Kathleen Conway, CBP
Liaison to USEU; Christine Cline, State/INL; Timothy Eydelnant, Emb
Helsinki; Alcy Frelick, State/CA; Jane Horvath, DOJ; Kenneth Kolb,
Emb Helsinki; Alessandro Nardi, State/EUR; Kenneth Prop, State/L;
Michael Scardaville, DHS; and Jessica Steffens, State/INL.
¶17. (U) EU participants included: Antti Pelttari, Director General
for the International Security Affairs Unit in the Finnish Ministry
of Interior; Matti Jousten, EU-Coordinator in the Finnish Ministry
of Justice; Giles de Kerchove, Director in the EU Council
Secretariat; Paul Hickey, Director in the EU Council Secretariat;
SIPDIS
Marque Tung-Lai, Director of JLS General Affairs in the European
Commission; Jan De Ceuster, Head of the Unit on Borders and Visas in
the European Commission; Roelof-Jan Manshot, Vice-President of
Eurojust; Maz-Peter Ratzel, Director of Europol; Michael Grotz,
Deputy Director General of German Federal Ministry of Justice;
Gunter Krause, German Federal Ministry of the Interior; as well as
Vivian Loonela, Administrator in the European Commission; Christiane
Hohmann, Administrator in the European Commission; Kari Rantama,
Finnish Deputy National Police Commissioner; Pentti Visanen, Finnish
Immigration Department; Kalle Kekomaki, Finnish Ministry of
Interior; Elina Isoksela, Finnish Ministry of Justice; Sakari
Vourensola, Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA); Leena
Kiukkonen, Finnish MFA; Juha Rainne, Finnish MFA; Hikka Nenonen,
Finnish MFA; and, Veli-Pekka Rautava, Finnish MFA.
¶18. (U) This cable has been cleared by the U.S. Delegation.
WARE