

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07REYKJAVIK114, Iceland: 2007 Parliamentary Elections, One Month Out
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07REYKJAVIK114.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07REYKJAVIK114 | 2007-04-18 13:01 | 2011-01-13 05:05 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Reykjavik |
VZCZCXRO9216
PP RUEHC
DE RUEHRK #0114/01 1081352
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 181352Z APR 07 ZDK EATC SVC #0827
FM AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3254
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 REYKJAVIK 000114
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL SENV EIND IC
SUBJECT: Iceland: 2007 Parliamentary Elections, One Month Out
Refs: A) 06 Reykjavik 416
B) 06 Reykjavik 359
C) 06 Reykjavik 312
D) 04 Reykjavik 354
REYKJAVIK 00000114 001.3 OF 004
¶1. (U) Summary: A month before Icelanders head to the polls for the
May 12 parliamentary elections, the Left Greens are riding a wave of
interest in environmental concerns. However, the emergence of a new
green party could splinter the environmentalist bloc and ensure the
current center-right coalition's survival. Apart from rhetoric
about retroactively withdrawing Iceland's support for the invasion
of Iraq in 2003 (but no other changes to Iceland's Middle East
policy), foreign policy has not been a campaign issue.
Environmentalist issues and energy-intensive industrial construction
feature prominently in all parties' campaigns, but many here are
comfortable with their quality of life and credit the Independence
Party-led government. In the end it might all come down to
Carville's phrase: "It's the economy, stupid." End Summary.
Election Procedures
-------------------
¶2. (SBU) Election procedures in Iceland are similar to those in most
Western European countries. The Althingi (parliament) has a total
of 63 seats which are allocated proportionally across six voting
districts. Voters cast their ballots for parties, not for
individual candidates, though the parties publish their candidate
lists in rank order ahead of the election. To receive an Althingi
seat, a party needs to receive at least five percent of the vote
nationwide, in addition to competing successfully within a given
district. The traditionally apolitical president, who is elected
separately in national elections in the year following Althingi
elections, is empowered to formally appoint the cabinet. In
practice, the leaders of the political parties forming the
successful coalition decide the makeup and allocation of cabinet
seats among themselves. Minority governments are not
constitutionally permitted. Traditionally, only when the party
leaders are unable to reach a conclusion by themselves in reasonable
time does the president exercise his power to appoint the cabinet
himself. Rumors continue to circulate, however, that the current
president will break with tradition to the benefit of his political
friends on the left (see below). Since 1991, two-party coalitions
have held power with the Independence Party as the senior partner,
but three-party coalitions were not uncommon in the past. Of the
seven parties running, we expect five or six will be represented in
the next parliament.
The Parties: Independence Leads The Way
---------------------------------------
¶3. (U) The Independence Party (IP), the senior party in the current
majority coalition, is a center-right party led by Prime Minister
Geir H. Haarde. In the past year party support has been measuring
at 36 to 43 percent in Gallup polls, a slight rise over the 33.7
percent (22 seats) they received in the 2003 Althingi elections.
The IP has a tendency to measure higher in polls than in elections,
but it can still safely expect to get between 30 and 40 percent of
the vote. The IP's campaign touts the government's economic record,
low unemployment, tax reductions, and diminishing government debt.
At the same time, the IP has responded to the local environmental
debate (Ref A) -- and some argue, stolen a plank from their primary
opposition, the Social Democratic Alliance -- by announcing plans to
slow down the build-up of heavy industry in Iceland, such as
aluminum smelters, and establish a framework plan for possible
future projects involving heavy industry.
¶4. (U) On foreign policy, the IP is a staunch supporter of the
bilateral defense relationship with the United States and Iceland's
NATO membership. Although IP stalwarts were frustrated with the
manner in which the USG announced the withdrawal of U.S. military
forces from Iceland in March 2006, PM Haarde's pragmatism and
trustworthiness has made him the frontrunner in forging a new
bilateral defense relationship with the United States. In addition,
the IP has emphasized the need for Iceland to take on more
responsibilities in security and defense affairs, fully realizing
the need to fill the void left by the departure of U.S. forces. The
party's success in this regard can be seen in the corresponding
failure of opposition challengers to put foreign policy on the
campaign agenda this spring.
Progressives: Running On Their Record (Sort Of)
--------------------------------------------- --
¶5. (U) The junior member in the coalition, the Progressive Party
(PP), is a traditionally agrarian and centrist party led by Minister
of Industry and Commerce Jon Sigurdsson. Despite getting 17.7
percent (12 seats) in the last election, polls show the party with
only eight to 10 percent support during the past year (which would
translate into a drop to five Althingi seats). The party has in
recent years attempted to extend its political base to urban areas,
with unsatisfactory results -- Iceland's new urbanites have instead
blamed the PP for industrializing Iceland's previously unspoiled
highlands, while their coalition partners the IP get all the credit
for recent economic growth. The Progressives' political base
REYKJAVIK 00000114 002 OF 004
remains in rural Iceland, mainly farming areas such as Southern and
Northeastern Iceland. The party supports continuing economic growth
through further build-up of heavy industry and is opposed to the
other parties' policies of putting a halt to or pausing further
development. Their slogan, "Continued Results -- Don't Stop!"
reflects the party's attempt to gain credit for Icelanders'
comfortable lifestyle and support for further industrial investment.
¶6. (U) On international affairs, the PP was more cautious in its
reactions to the closure of NASKEF and, apart from then-PM Halldor
Asgrimsson's initial fit of pique, stayed largely aloof from the
bilateral negotiations on the future arrangement of the bilateral
defense relationship. Foreign Minister Sverrisdottir of the
Progressives has, however, let slip a few public comments of
frustration regarding the withdrawal of U.S. forces. The PP has
flirted with the idea of looking to Europe and not just the U.S.,
with the FM making several comments over the past year about the
"inevitability" of studying questions related to EU membership. The
party is generally pro-American and pro-NATO, however, and has
welcomed energy-intensive industrial investment by large American
corporations, such as Alcoa, in Iceland.
The Alliance: Still Trying To Find Its Way
------------------------------------------
¶7. (U) The Social Democratic Alliance (SDA), a center-left party,
was officially established in 2000 from the merger of four leftist
and center-left parties. After a good showing in the 2003 elections
(20 seats) followed by a change of party leadership in 2005 (current
leader Ingibjorg Solrun Gisladottir is Iceland's only female party
chair), the SDA has been losing momentum and its support has dropped
steadily -- polls in March put the SDA at around 20 percent, behind
the Left-Greens (see below) for the first time in its history. The
SDA has touted the need to renovate the Icelandic welfare system
along the lines of the Nordic social democratic welfare model in
order to counter growing income disparity over the last decade. The
SDA maintains that the current government has mismanaged the
economy, to the detriment of the the elderly and the disabled in
particular. On "green" matters, the party has often wobbled in its
attitudes towards further buildup of heavy industry. The SDA's
present campaign platform, however, calls for an interim freeze on
all plans for further industrial buildup, pending drafting of a
framework to exclude certain locations from industrial development.
When it comes to foreign relations, the SDA has pronounced itself
"skeptical" of the value of current defense ties with the U.S. and
alleges that the GOI could have achieved more in negotiations in
2006 had it been better prepared for the withdrawal of U.S. forces
(Ref B). The SDA is the only party to openly call for E.U.
membership for Iceland and has similarly said that Iceland should
look to Europe more on security matters. Party chair Gisladottir
has also pledged that the first act of any SDA-led government will
be to retroactively remove Iceland from the list of countries that
supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq, though without stating any
alternative policy goals regarding the Middle East.
The Left-Greens: Flavor Of The Month?
-------------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) The Left-Green Movement (LG) is composed of the leftists
who did not want to join the SDA when it formed, due to concerns
over both ideology and leadership. The party did not do well in the
2003 elections with only 8.8 percent of the vote (five seats), but
since then has capitalized on the environmental issues wave that has
swept Iceland in the last couple of years. In the past year the LG
has been polling around 20 percent, with support surging as high as
27 percent in the past few months. The LG is no longer a fringe
party and will likely be a major player in the post-election
coalition negotiations, though party leaders privately voice concern
that the new "Iceland Movement" (see below) will draw from the same
pool of disaffected voters. The Left Greens have been commended for
having a clear position on issues, and have thus pulled left-leaning
voters from the comparatively wishy-washy SDA. Despite an avowedly
socialist view on economic and fiscal policy, the LG claims it will
not raise taxes, but will instead redistribute the tax burden in
order to decrease income disparity. On its pet issue, the
environment, the LG wants all plans for further buildup of heavy
industry to be halted in favor of the creation of diverse sources of
employment in rural areas. From its founding, the LG platform has
called for Iceland's withdrawal from NATO and the development of a
pacifist, cooperation-oriented foreign policy. That said, the LG
Chair admitted to the Ambassador that he sees the need for the party
to be "realistic" and that withdrawal from NATO will not be in the
cards any time soon. There is no question, however, that if in
government the Greens will demand that Iceland's name be immediately
removed from the Coalition of the Willing regarding Iraq.
Liberals: Xenophobia Isn't Selling, Yet
---------------------------------------
¶9. (U) The Liberal Party (LP) was originally a one-issue party
fighting the current quota system of fisheries management in
Iceland. The party drew 7.4 percent (four seats) in the last
elections, but its support had dropped to about three to four
REYKJAVIK 00000114 003.5 OF 004
percent by last November. At that point, the LP caught the public's
attention when it raised the issue of the growing numbers of
immigrant workers coming to Iceland after labor movement within the
European Economic Area was fully liberalized in May 2006. The party
warned of possible consequences for the Icelandic wage market, the
future of the welfare system, and Icelandic society as a whole if
foreigners did not properly "adjust" to their new home. After an
initial spike in LP following in the polls, the public at large and
other political parties have since lambasted the LP for being
xenophobic and even racist in its attitudes towards foreigners.
(Comment: Likely due to the fact that unemployment is so low --
around two percent -- that the arrival of immigrants is helping,
rather than burdening, the Icelandic economy. End comment.) They
deny these allegations but their campaign advertisements suggest
that there may be some truth to these accusations. While the party
still emphasizes fisheries management, the immigrant issue appears
to be taking over as issue number one. The LP is fairly pro-American
and supports Iceland's NATO membership and maintaining the bilateral
defense relationship with the U.S.
The Iceland Movement: Splitting the Green Vote
--------------------------------------------- -
¶10. (SBU) The newest political party on the scene, The Iceland
Movement - Living Land (IM), fashions itself as a "right-green"
party headed by a well-known television personality, who is the
party's interim chairman. The first polls since the party's
formation in February, 2007 indicate that the party would get
approximately five percent in the elections. Like the Left Greens,
the IM wants to stop further buildup of energy-intensive industries
that would affect unspoiled natural areas. Observers point out that
this candidacy will divide environmentalist voters instead of
uniting them, and thus likely benefit the current coalition
partners. A Progressive Party stalwart gleefully told the
Ambassador that he welcomes The Iceland Movement's candidacy for
exactly this reason, and joked that maybe a few more environmental
groups ought to run for parliament. So far the IM's position
towards the U.S. -- and virtually every other issue -- is a tabula
rasa.
Coalition Options
-----------------
¶11. (U) Until very recently, the predominant assumption among both
political pundits and the general public was that the current
coalition government would be history after May 12 (owing largely to
the Progressives' collapse in 2006 -- Ref C). A mid-March Gallup
poll showed that 28 percent of voters wanted a center-left coalition
(SDA and LG), while 24 percent wanted to see the current coalition
live on. One coalition option that has often come up is a marriage
of the extremes on right and left (the IP and the LG), which polled
at 22 percent in March. Two options that are commonly believed to
be off the table are a right and center-left (IP and SDA) mix, and a
coalition of all three current opposition parties in parliament --
both of these choices are polling at less than 10 percent. However,
the emergence of The Iceland Movement has thrown previous forecasts
into disarray, and Gallup poll data released on April 16 have the
current IP-PP coalition defying earlier odds at 36 percent support,
the most popular option. An old saw of Icelandic politics is that
the Progressives always do better than the pre-election polls
indicate. In this case, thanks to the IM, the Progressives may do
better than even the election results themselves indicate, as the
"right-greens" may do just well enough to sink the left's chances
without getting any Althingi seats themselves. In this scenario,
the IP and PP would get a higher number of Althingi seats than their
raw share of votes cast.
¶12. (SBU) One final wild card, however, is the possible role of
President Olafur Ragnar Grimsson. Grimsson, a former MP and
minister for one of the SDA's predecessor parties, has had a number
of public spats with the current government during his tenure, most
notably surrounding his unprecedented use of presidential veto power
against a media ownership bill in 2004 (Ref D). Advisors in the
current government have passed to the Ambassador rumblings that
Grimsson, convinced that the IP-PP government is doing irreparable
damage to the country, may take another unprecedented step in May
and give the mandate to form a government to one of the parties on
the left. Though constitutionally allowed, such a move might seem
to many as a gross overstepping of the bounds of the President's
generally ceremonial role. It is not clear how the potential
constitutional crisis in this case might be resolved.
¶13. (SBU) Comment: As the issues have been framed so far, in a
month's time Iceland's voters will face a referendum on whether
heavy industrial investment is the price to be paid for Iceland's
high standard of living or if some of the economy's vibrancy should
be traded for preserving untouched areas of the country. Absent any
involvement by President Grimsson, PM Haarde's Independence Party
will likely be the driving force when coalition negotiations begin
after the elections. Unless The Iceland Movement splinters the
enviro-vote enough to let the current coalition continue, the next
GOI will need to take account of environmental concerns and may be
forced to slow down the pace of investment in aluminum and other
REYKJAVIK 00000114 004.3 OF 004
heavy industries -- a move that would likely have a direct impact on
the two U.S. aluminum firms active here. On other issues of
importance to the USG, however, any IP-led government can be
expected to continue most current GOI policies.
CAMPBELL