

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07MEXICO4334, MEXICAN TELECOMMUNICATION POLICY TARGETS TELMEX
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07MEXICO4334.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07MEXICO4334 | 2007-08-14 15:03 | 2011-03-17 12:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Mexico |
Appears in these articles: http://wikileaks.jornada.com.mx/notas/hay-preocupacion-de-que-el-duopolio-televisivo-sigue-ejerciendo-influencia-sobre-poderes-judicial-y-legislativo |
VZCZCXRO9872
PP RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #4334/01 2261531
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 141531Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAFCC/FCC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8425
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
118838
2007-08-14 15:31:00
07MEXICO4334
Embassy Mexico
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
07STATE45618
VZCZCXRO9872
PP RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #4334/01 2261531
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 141531Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAFCC/FCC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8425
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 MEXICO 004334
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/MEX AND EB/CIP
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR JONATHAN MCHALE AND CATHERINE
HINCKLEY
FCC FOR HELEN DOMENICI, KATHRYN O'BRIEN, AND DAVID FURTH,
FCC FOR LARRY OLSON, BRIAN MARENCO AND EMILY TALAGA
NTIA FOR KARL NEBBIA AND JANE COFFIN
USDOC FOR 4320/ITA/MAC/WH/ONAFTA/GWORD
ITA FOR MICHELLE O'NEILL AND DAMON GREER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ECPS ENIV PGOV MX
SUBJECT: MEXICAN TELECOMMUNICATION POLICY TARGETS TELMEX
REF: STATE 45618
Summary
-------
¶1. (SBU) On August 3, as part of the Ninth Meeting of the
High Level Consultative Commission (HLCC) on
Telecommunications, Rafael del Villar, Under Secretary for
Communications at the Secretariat of Communications and
Transportation (SCT), briefed a small group of Department of
State (DOS), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and
Department of Commerce (DOC) officials on Mexican President
Felipe Calderon's telecommunications policy. SCT Secretary
Luis Tellez Kuenzler joined the meeting and supported del
Villar's assertions. Del Villar emphasized that SCT's
primary concern is the lack of penetration of landline
telephone and broadband services. Among other proposals, del
Villar suggested that while participating in the upcoming
Security and Prosperity Partnership in Canada, the three
Leaders propose to dramatically lower long distance
interconnection rates to make calling within North America
within reach for even the poorest citizens. With the "social
good" argument as a backbone, it appears that the SCT and
possibly the Calderon Government may try to tackle the
Mexican telecom monopoly, Telmex's dominance in the sector.
End Summary.
Clarifying Roles in the Sector
------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) Summarizing the current state of Mexico's telecom
sector, del Villar said the Calderon administration will seek
to clarify the roles SCT, the Federal Telecommunications
Commission (Cofetel), and the Federal Competition Commission
(Cofeco) play in the sector. He highlighted the political
role of the SCT as a planning and policy body with the power
to decide which radio frequency bands will be auctioned and
when. He stated that, for the first time since 1990 (when
Telmex was privatized), the SCT is more willing to support
competition and openness than the regulator (Cofetel), a
situation he termed a "political anomaly." Also, for the
first time in Mexican history, the President is keenly aware
of the important issues facing the telecom sector and is
creating a political climate that is conducive to moving
forward with telecom policy. He pointed out that Cofetel is
a part of the SCT (and hence Executive Branch) and not an
independent regulator like the FCC in the U.S. He also
stressed that the SCT currently enjoys an excellent working
relationship with Cofeco.
Social Good Argument
--------------------
3.(SBU) Del Villar observed that the rural areas of Mexico
have been devastated by migration. He cited "heroic
families" in which the husband travels to the U.S. to work to
send money home, yet his wife is left in Mexico, unable to
call her husband in the U.S. because of prohibitively high
telecommunication rates. High fixed and mobile
interconnection rates; the lack of unlimited calling plans;
and the need for technology to decrease overall telecom costs
drive SCT telecom policy. He reiterated Mexico's commitment
to "Calling Party Pays," but also his concern with the level
of tariffs. He might seek to implement a "Bill and Keep"
regime in mobile telephony in Mexico in which each network
agrees to terminate calls from the other network at no
charge. Cofetel is in the process of developing its
Fundamental Technical Plan for Interconnection and is holding
a second period for public comment that ends August 10.
Broadband Penetration Lacking
-----------------------------
¶4. (SBU) Del Villar suggested possible policy changes to
promote broadband penetration in Mexico. Broadband network
"unbundling" would foster increased network investment by
outside players. Del Villar added that Mexico would label
this proposal "leasing of the last mile" to avoid any
MEXICO 00004334 002 OF 003
negative stigma. He noted that while this policy would be
tough to implement, it was nonetheless being considered
because SCT has not seen sufficient investment by Telmex in
its network. Second, he suggested that Mexico allow the
resale of broadband in the marketplace. Third, because
approximately twenty-six percent of Mexican mobile users do
not have access to a fixed line, he would like broadband to
be offered on a stand-alone basis instead of solely with a
package. Last, he suggested one option for Mexico might be
public-private partnerships in which the government might be
the owner of spectrum that is operated by a local government
or community mechanism. Mexico, he continued, has the
spectrum available to do this with the ultimate goal being
increased rural access to the Internet.
Broadcasting Sector in the Hands of the President
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶5. (SBU) Throughout the conversation, del Villar was
careful to reiterate that he was referring only to Mexican
telecommunications policy, not broadcasting. Because of the
political fallout that licensing a third broadcasting network
would cause, the decision on whether to move forward rests
with President Calderon. Del Villar did mention that through
changes in the existing licenses of current broadcasters, the
Government may impose a "must carry / must offer" policy. He
noted SCT fears Telmex collusion with Televisa in the video
services market to secure cheap content, while squeezing out
other smaller potential competitors.
Spectrum Negotiations
---------------------
¶6. (SBU) The U.S. and Mexican delegations also held spectrum
negotiations during a three-day HLCC working level meeting
(July 31-August 2) immediately prior to the Ninth HLCC on
August 3. As a result, at the Ninth HLCC the principals
signed three documents:(A)A Permanent Protocol concerning the
allotment and use of the 138-144 MHz band for terrestrial
non-broadcasting radio communication services along the
U.S.-Mexican border; (B) A Joint Statement of the principals
at the Ninth HLCC; and (C) A Directory of Bilateral Issues
for 2007-2009 (DBI). In terms of ongoing negotiations to
reconfigure the allotment plan of the 800 MHz band, del
Villar noted that the SCT is actively engaged in negotiations
with Nextel Mexico and Intercomunicacion del Pacifico, a
subsidiary of Telmex, the two most affected Mexican carriers.
The SCT also requested assistance from the FCC in determining
a realistic cost for network carrier actions to relocate the
affected Mexican carriers within the 800 MHz band as well as
to move them to an alternate band.
¶7. (SBU) On the topic of increasing broadband penetration by
means of near-term spectrum auctions, (para.4 above), in the
three-day working level meeting, SCT and Cofetel officials
pressed U.S. representatives to identify additional radio
bands suitable for broadband applications and place them in
the DBI so that new cross-border sharing agreements could be
reached. These bands included: 420-450 MHz, 698-806 MHz
("700 MHz"), 2300-2400 MHz and 3300-3700 MHz bands. All of
these bands were included in the DBI except the 2300-2400 MHz
which will be discussed informally in upcoming HLCC working
level teleconferences. (The U.S. and Mexico currently have
an agreement in place for the 2310-2360 MHz band for the
Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service used extensively by
U.S. providers XM Satellite Radio and Sirius Satellite
Radio). SCT and Cofetel also mentioned their interest in
amending the existing Protocol for Personal Communications
Services in the 1850-1990 MHz band to also support wireless
broadband.
The three HLCC documents that were signed will be posted
shortly on the Department's public website at :
http://www.state.gov/e/eeb/cip/c622.htm.
Improvements for Cross Border Security Communications
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶8. (SBU) Representatives of Mexico's Secretariat of Public
MEXICO 00004334 003 OF 003
Safety (SSP) and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
reported in the working level meeting that the HLCC Security
Communications Task Group plans to complete its Plan for the
Long Term Solution for Cross Border Security Communications
shortly and submit the Plan to the HLCC for adoption. The
Plan reportedly includes establishment of six cross border
microwave links in the 7-8.5 GHz band that will allow voice,
data and video intercommunications between communications
centers of law enforcement agencies on both sides. In the
principals meeting, DOS also mentioned the need for a second
phase of the "Long Term Solution" that would address
reciprocal licensing for mobile and portable equipment of
public safety agencies on both sides as well as improving
mutual-aid communications for specific individual public
safety agencies on each side. These are the continuing
actions described in reftel, and the Plan will be distributed
to border consulates when completed.
Del Villar Proposes a North America-wide Calling Area
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶9. (SBU) Lowering interconnection rates is high on SCT's
agenda, justified to the public and the industry by the
"social good" argument. At the meeting, del Villar and
Tellez said that if the U.S., Canada and Mexico could come to
an agreement to trilaterally lower interconnection rates for
telephony across the region, this would help the GOM to
convince Telmex to relinquish some hold on the sector.
Comment
-------
¶10. (SBU) Telmex seems to be feeling the pressure as there is
already speculation in the industry that the monopoly will
file an injunction against Cofetel's proposed interconnection
plan. The SCT appears to have firmly taken control of
telecommunications policy in Mexico and has an arsenal of
ideas for progress in the sector. In telecommunication
negotiations, we are seeing unprecedented levels of positive
engagement from our Mexican counterparts. SCT Under
Secretary del Villar has a lot of energy and progressive
SIPDIS
ideas, now it's a matter of how much momentum he can gather
to push for change in the industry. End comment.
¶11. (U) This cable was prepared jointly with collaboration
of members of the U.S. delegation from EEB/CIP.
Visit Mexico City's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/mexicocity and the North American
Partnership Blog at http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/nap /
BASSETT