

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06BOGOTA5603, POSSIBLE GOC-FARC TALKS: VIEW FROM THE COLOMBIAN
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06BOGOTA5603.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06BOGOTA5603 | 2006-06-21 22:10 | 2011-03-02 12:12 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Bogota |
Appears in these articles: http://www.elespectador.com/wikileaks |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHBO #5603/01 1722205
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 212205Z JUN 06
FM AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6223
INFO RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 7858
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ JUN LIMA 3930
RUEHZP/AMEMBASSY PANAMA 9277
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO 4578
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC//USDP ADMIN/CHAIRS//
CO N F I D E N T I A L BOGOTA 005603
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/07/2016
TAGS: PTER PGOV MARR CO
SUBJECT: POSSIBLE GOC-FARC TALKS: VIEW FROM THE COLOMBIAN
LEFT
REF: BOGOTA 4662
Classified By: Ambassador William B. Wood.
Reason: 1.4 (b,d)
-------
Summary
-------
¶1. (C) Reftel outlined reasons why some mainly leftist
interlocutors considered GOC-FARC peace talks possible in
President Uribe's second term. According to these contacts,
the FARC's top demands are land reform, political
reconstruction, and social welfare programs, along with a
need for personal security and "respect" for the FARC's
"struggle." They said the GOC should continue military
pressure and consider creative proposals to draw the FARC
leadership into talks. They also asserted U.S. engagement
would be vital to a successful process. End Summary.
-------------------
What the FARC Wants
-------------------
¶2. (C) Former peace commissioner Daniel Garcia Pena said the
FARC's priority is land reform. Academic Fernando Cubides
added the FARC wanted to reverse appropriations by
paramilitaries. Demobilized FARC commander alias 'Nicolas'
concurred, saying, "This is not about confiscation but about
redistribution." The guerillas' economic agenda has mellowed
over time, according to President Pastrana's peace
commissionerCamilo Gonzalez, from "a Stalinist to a Social
Democratic platform." Garcia Pena stressed that, "The FARC
define themselves as Marxists but their agenda is not."
¶3. (C) The FARC's agenda would include social issues. In a
2006 communique, FARC leader Manuel Marulanda referred to
FARC proposals at Caguan which the GOC did not address:
unemployment subsidies, money for social work projects, and
pilot programs for alternative crops to coca. Cubides
emphasized welfare programs to alleviate underlying problems
driving coca cultivation. Ex-FARC commander 'Nicolas' spoke
of the restructuring of wealth and social reinvestment,
applying the FARC adage "social justice is the name of peace"
to food, health, and jobs. Policy analyst Ana Teresa Bernal
recounted that at Caguan, "Marulanda said the most important
thing was employment.... a jump-start plan not profound
reforms. Mostly the FARC wanted to show the population that
their plans were of benefit."
¶4. (C) Politically the FARC wants "a reordering of the
political-administrative map" (said Cubides) and "a
government of national reconstruction" (said Garcia Pena).
The consensus view was that a constitutional assembly would
be essential to write any accord into law. Gonzalez noted
the FARC had no popular base and would demand a guaranteed
bloc in such a forum (on the order of 10-15 percent). Form
is as important as substance, he said: "It would be a fiction
but an important one." Reparations Commission chair Eduardo
Pizarro pragmatically agreed that an assembly is not a reform
per se, only a framework for future changes. It would
satisfy what several speakers signaled as the FARC's vital
need for recognition as political actors. In Pizarro's more
pointed phrasing, "The FARC will negotiate to save face.
They need to justify forty years of war."
-------------------------
Policy: 'Push' and 'Pull'
-------------------------
¶5. (C) Interlocutors recommended a combination of military
pressure and policy incentives to both push and pull the FARC
to the table. Despite the overall leftward leaning of the
group, none favored leniency; all agreed it was critical for
the GOC to sustain military operations against the FARC until
they agreed to negotiate. Ironically it was ex-FARC
commander 'Nicolas' who was most emphatic on this point:
"Continued military pressure is essential...to show the FARC
there is absolutely no possibility they can take power with
military action."
¶6. (C) All said military pressure must go hand in hand with
political, economic, and social incentives. (Embassy
MILGROUP says even COLMIL commanders echo the same
sentiment.) Gonzalez spoke at length on this theme,
stressing the need to break out of conventional molds and
explore "audacious ideas." With respect to agrarian reform,
for example, he commented positively on Marulanda'sCaguan
proposal that the GOC give the FARC lands to showcase
agrarian reforms, however unrealistic it might sound. For a
political agenda, he urged a dedicated planning task force,
on the same lines as MOD strategy teams.
--------------------------------------------- --------
U.S. Role: Prestige, Mediation, and (Non-)Extradition
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶7. (C) Marulanda'scommunique of January 2006 said, "The
gringos play a part in the conflict, and any solution must
pass through them." Several commentators stressed the
critical role of the U.S. in any peace process with the FARC.
A large part of this is related to prestige; according to
Gonzalez, "The FARC would only negotiate with those they
consider powerful, such as the U.S. Because they have a
simplistic conception of the U.S. as their enemy, they would
also respect it as an interlocutor. This would be the FARC's
biggest triumph."
¶8. (C) The U.S. role has practical ramifications, too,
particularly regarding the FARC's desire for guarantees of
personal security against the threat of extradition. Pizarro
advised that in coming months Washington's attitude should
"move from stick to carrot, from tough to talking." He
(echoed by 'Nicolas') said the U.S. "big incentive" is
extradition, and suggested U.S. mediation would be required
before a deal was struck. The presence of the international
community at peace talks would lend to the proceedings the
prestige the FARC leadership craves.
---------------------------
How Might The FARC Respond?
---------------------------
¶9. (C) The FARC leadership is marked by a high degree of
unity and unanimity, according to analysts, and would be
unlikely to split into factions during talks. Pizarro
stressed its "enormous internal cohesion" and lack of
infighting over decades. Garcia seconded this, saying the
Secretariat was "profoundly unified.... Decisions are by
SIPDIS
consensus." Marulanda is said to have the last word; but his
advanced age (around eighty) throws open the issue of
succession. Looking ahead, FARC behavior in peace talks is
difficult to predict, because it would depend on the
personalities in charge at the time.
¶10. (C) Garcia said FARC members of campesino origin (like
Marulanda and military leader alias Mono Jojoy) tend to be
most pragmatic, while those of urban origin and higher
education (e.g., ideologue Alfonso Cano) are most radical and
stubborn. Unfortunately, Pizarro predicted leadership in a
negotiation scenario would likely pass to the urban political
types, while military chiefs would take a back seat.
'Nicolas' summed up, "Mono was pragmatic only because he
doesn't believe in negotiation; he's a man of action. Cano
would never negotiate, for the opposite reason, that he's too
political.... Ivan Marquez would be disposed to peace. He
has said that after 40 years of fighting it's time to end it
but without betraying Marxist principles.... The Army should
get Cano and Mono, to allow Marquez to breathe and lead."
-------------------------------
Past Attempts: Lessons Learned?
-------------------------------
¶11. (C) Three sets of FARC talks have occurred in the last
25 years, each failing for distinct reasons:
- In 1983-6 at La Uribe, the FARC was more dogmatic than
pragmatic, says former negotiator Camilo Gonzalez; its
Marxist rhetoric has since mellowed.
- In 1991 the FARC broke off brief talks at Caracas/Tlaxcala;
Gonzalez cited excessive FARC demands for the failure, while
ex-EPL leader Alvaro Villaraga added FARC "outrage" at
parallel processes with other guerilla groups, heavy COLMIL
strikes including on the FARC's high command, and post-Soviet
communist disarray.
- The last attempt, in 1999-2002 at Caguan, was merely a
"pretense," said Gonzalez, with the FARC buying time to
strengthen its forces and the GOC launching Plan Colombia.
Analyst Alfredo Rangel said the GOC showed up with no plans:
"The government did not make any proposals at Caguan; all
proposals came from the FARC." FARC leader Marulanda
similarly attributed the 2002 collapse to GOC unpreparedness
and its failure to offer anything concrete in return for
demobilization.
¶12. (C) Historically the FARC has not negotiated in good
faith. Villaraga and ex-FARC commander alias 'Nicolas'
insisted the FARC was serious about peace and political
reform in 1983-1986, but academic Roman Ortiz said both were
proven wrong by the FARC's 1982 Conference resolution to
double its forces. 'Nicolas' confirmed that at the 2000
plenum the FARC's leading ideologue Alfonso Cano proposed
striking the oligarchy while its guard was down. With regard
to drugs, there is no evidence for the FARC's purported
interest in eliminating trafficking (reftel). The precedents
suggest a wary attitude towards FARC intent, as well as an
attitude of 'trust but verify' during any period of cease
fire.
-------
Comment
-------
¶13. (C) The interlocutors cited above either honestly or
dishonestly portray the FARC as serious about its political
agenda and depict peace talks as a forum for setting national
policies and programs. Unquestionably the FARC is to some
degree a captive of its political rhetoric, but we would
expect FARC policy interests to take a back seat to the
conditions and obligations of their demobilization in any
eventual peace talks. We also would expect the GOC to reject
any discussions of national policy beyond the conditions of
FARC re-insertion. We do not believe that the FARC is so
unified that no elements would seek a separate peace with the
government, but we agree that if talks ever begin with the
FARC as such, they will be able to maintain a consolidated
negotiating position. Finally, it was predictable that U.S.
direct involvement would be sought. We see no reason even to
contemplate such a step.
WOOD