

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09OTTAWA581, Canada's Foreign Investment Reforms Create A More Open
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09OTTAWA581.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09OTTAWA581 | 2009-07-27 19:07 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO7520
PP RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHMT RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0581/01 2081908
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 271908Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9705
INFO RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 2007
RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000581
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR E, EB/DCT, WHA/EX, WHA/CAN
STATE PASS USTR (SULLIVAN)
COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC (WORD AND BARRAGAN)
TREASURY FOR IA (NEPHEW)
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EFIN ETRD EINV EIND PREL CA
SUBJECT: Canada's Foreign Investment Reforms Create A More Open
Market But Do Not Spare U.S. Steel from Canadian Court Action
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Canada's July 17 federal court action against U.S.
Steel attempts to force the company to meet the production and
employment commitments it made to the Federal Government in 2007 in
exchange for permission to take over Canada's Stelco. At that time,
the GOC exercised its legal right make foreign acquisition of
Canadian assets conditional on the fulfillment of certain
performance requirements. However, at the same time as the Federal
Industry Ministry is cracking down on investor behavior, the
Conservative government is also implementing changes to the national
investment regime that would make Canada a more open and transparent
investment destination for foreign investors. Although most of the
proposed regulations are not controversial, some foreign investors
will be dismayed that Canada's new security requirements demand
increased disclosure of confidential information and increase the
possibility that the government might disallow an investment on
security grounds even after the transaction has been completed. End
summary.
U.S. Steel
----------
¶2. (U) On July 17, Minister of Industry Tony Clement announced that
the Government of Canada was launching an action against U.S. Steel
in the Superior Court of Canada to remedy an alleged breach of
Canadian investment law. The American steelmaker's 2007 acquisition
of Ontario-based Stelco was predicated upon the company maintaining
minimum levels of Canadian employment, capital expenditures and
production. In May 2009, the industry minister threatened legal
action after U.S. Steel cut production and laid off employees at its
Canadian operations in tandem with the global economic recession.
ICA Undertakings
----------------
¶3. (U) Canada's Investment Canada Act (ICA) permits the Industry
Minister to bind foreign investors to obligations on matters such as
local production and employment levels in order to ensure that the
investment provides a 'net benefit' to Canada. Following a recent
exchange of letters with the company, Clement stated, "I remain of
the view that U.S. Steel is not complying with its undertakings, and
I am not satisfied by its explanations for non-compliance." If the
Canadian court finds that an investor has breached an ICA
undertaking, remedies include curing the breach, fines or forced
divestiture of the investment. In this case, the Industry Minister
has asked the courts to levy a C$10,000-a-day fine against U.S.
Steel, retroactive to the November 2008 Canadian layoffs.
¶4. (SBU) Although the terms of the undertakings a company makes to
the government are generally confidential, the Canadian media is
reporting that when U.S. Steel bought the bankrupt Stelco in 2007
for C$1.16 billion, it promised to boost production at Stelco mills
by 10 per cent in each of the first three years of ownership and to
maintain 3,105 full-time employees. Today, some 2,400 workers have
either retired or been laid off by U.S. Steel, and the company has
halted steel output in Hamilton and Nanticoke, Ont. In its court
filing, the government alleges that the company has defaulted on 77
percent of its employment commitment. (Comment: Since U.S. Steel
Qpercent of its employment commitment. (Comment: Since U.S. Steel
has not responded publically to the GOC court action it is not known
whether the company's undertakings included any exemptions for
exogenous economic downturns. End comment.) This is the first time
the Canadian government has taken a foreign company to court over
promises made as part of an acquisition (although it has threatened
similar action against the Brazilian mining company Vale Inco which
has laid off approximately 400 workers).
¶5. (SBU) Some Canadians are criticizing the government's move for
the negative message it will send to other potential foreign
investors. A Globe and Mail editorial argues that although Ottawa
may be legally entitled to its actions, Stelco's 2007 commitments
are unreasonable in today's volatile economic climate. The paper
speculates that Canada's hard line against Stelco may be intended as
a warning to General Motors and Chrysler that they will be similarly
held to the employment commitments they made in exchange for federal
OTTAWA 00000581 002 OF 003
bailout funds. Nevertheless, the Globe concludes, "Ottawa should
refrain from intervening in future foreign takeovers. In a world
where economic volatility can render hard-won promises
impracticable, it simply isn't worth it."
¶6. (SBU) Christopher Sands, a senior fellow at Washington's Hudson
Institute, notes that the Canadian action puts U.S. Steel in the
difficult position of having to sideline one government's policy in
order to comply with another's. The steel industry has been hit
hard by the slump in construction and one of U.S. Steel's best
customers is the U.S. government, which has imposed strict Buy
American rules. This means that U.S. Steel has a stronger incentive
than usual to cut Canadian production to maintain higher volumes at
U.S. mills. Consequently, Sands suggests, the future decisions of
U.S Steel "will be determined by which government they fear more."
Changes to ICA
--------------
¶7. (U) In spite of the actions regarding Stelco, the Harper
Government is moving forward with commitments to open up the
Canadian economy to more foreign investment. In March 2009
preliminary changes to the Investment Canada Act (ICA) were
introduced as part of the government's budget legislation. These
were followed on July 11, 2009 with a number of proposed regulations
to give effect to the investment changes contained in the budget.
Among the most important amendments are increased investment
thresholds -- to determine which foreign investments will be subject
to a full governmental review -- and the imposition of a new
national security screening mechanism. Canada also plans to
eliminate differential review thresholds for transportation and
financial services and uranium production. The proposed regulations
will take effect after a 30-day comment period and do not require a
vote in the House of Commons.
Higher thresholds, new formulas, same cultural barriers
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶8. (SBU) The ICA requires that direct foreign takeovers of large
Canadian companies be reviewed and approved based on whether or not
the investment constitutes a "net benefit to Canada." (Comment:
The net benefit criteria are not spelled out in legal terms and are
open to a range of interpretations depending on the disposition of
the government in power. End comment.) Frequently, the government
will ask the foreign investor to provide negotiated undertakings
such as those assumed by U.S. Steel. Under the old rules, an ICA
review is required for any direct takeover by foreign investors from
a WTO country of a Canadian company with more than C$312 million in
gross assets. The new regulations will increase the review
threshold, first to C$600 million and ultimately to C$1 billion by
the end of four years.
¶9. (SBU) Although the higher thresholds mean fewer foreign
investments will likely be subject to full review, all foreign
investments must be notified to the government. Also the
methodology for determining the review threshold will be expanded
from considering only the asset value of the proposed acquisition to
a broader evaluation based on a company's market capitalization,
assets, and liabilities. Despite the new regulations, Canada's
Qassets, and liabilities. Despite the new regulations, Canada's
pre-existing regime banning virtually all foreign investment in
cultural industries remains unchanged, even though the 2008
government report Compete to Win recommended reforms in this area.
Enhanced national security requirements
---------------------------------------
¶10. (U) Under the proposed regulations, a foreign investor will have
to disclose the names of directors, the five highest paid officers,
any person or entity holding more than ten percent of the investor's
equity or voting rights, and the name of any foreign state that
holds a direct or indirect ownership interest in the investor, even
minor shareholders. The security disclosure requirements apply to
all foreign investments (including acquisitions and the
establishment of new businesses), even those that fall below the
OTTAWA 00000581 003 OF 003
review threshold.
¶11. (SBU) The new regulations set out time frames for the government
to invoke the national security screening process - generally within
45 days after a notice of investment or review application has been
filed. However, in cases of investments valued below the applicable
review threshold, the government has up to 45 days after an
investment has been implemented to determine whether it should be
submitted to a full security screening. (Comment: Presumably, this
longer period exists to prevent smaller acquisitions that are not
subject to other forms of review from slipping under the radar and
to provide adequate time for the government to obtain more
information about the proposed investment and investor. End
comment.)
¶12. (U) The security review could take as long as four months and
will be conducted primarily by Canada's security and intelligence
agencies. If an investment is found to be a threat to national
security then the investment can be unwound or restricted.
Implications of Canadian changes for US investors
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶13. (SBU) Although the subjective net benefits test has not been
eliminated from Canada's foreign investment review process, the
higher review threshold means that fewer investments will be
subjected to it. As well, the addition of a more transparent
process to ensure that investments are not injurious to national
security brings Canada's policy more closely into alignment with
that of the United States. The clarification of Canada's security
requirements comes too late to affect the failed 2008 attempt by
US-based Alliant Techsystems, Inc. to take over the space-assets arm
of Canada's MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates Ltd (MDA), which
Ottawa vetoed on national security grounds. However during a
meeting with Embassy officials last week, a senior Industry Canada
official speculated that if the new security framework had been in
place at the time of Alliant's bid, the outcome could have been
quite different.