

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09PARIS264, S/WCI AMBASSADOR WILLIAMSON DISCUSSES GUANTANAMO
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PARIS264.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09PARIS264 | 2009-02-20 16:04 | 2010-11-30 16:04 | SECRET//NOFORN | Embassy Paris |
VZCZCXYZ0009
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHFR #0264/01 0511653
ZNY SSSSS ZZH (CCY AD3230EB MSI1033-695)
O 201653Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5580
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
S E C R E T PARIS 000264
NOFORN
SIPDIS
C O R R E C T E D COPY CAPTION
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/19/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL MOPS PTER PHUM KAWK KISL KPAO FR
SUBJECT: S/WCI AMBASSADOR WILLIAMSON DISCUSSES GUANTANAMO
BAY DETAINEES WITH FRENCH OFFICIALS
REF: A. SECSTATE 6516
¶B. PARIS 00119
¶C. PARIS 02016
¶D. VILNIUS 88
Classified By: POL MC Kathleen H. Allegrone for reasons 1.4 (B & D).
¶1. (S/NF) SUMMARY: S/WCI Ambassador Williamson met with
French MFA officials on February 16 to discuss detainee
issues, France's role in the EU process and possible
resettlement of Guantanamo Bay detainees in France.
Williamson noted that France has a unique role to play in
formulating a process within the European Union (EU) to
accept detainees and helping assuage the concerns of member
states that might stymie EU consensus on the issue. Foreign
Ministry Director of Communications and spokesman Eric
Chevallier reiterated France's willingness to assist the U.S.
on this issue (ref b and c), but noted that the GOF position
was "very clear": detainees would be reviewed on a
case-by-case basis; the detainee had to specifically request
resettlement in France; and France would need full
information on interested detainees to review any security
and judicial implications. Chevallier said the GOF supports
an open EU process that would allow decisions to be made on a
national basis, similar to what current EU president the
Czech Republic has proposed. The most important issue, he
said, would be addressing concerns among Schengen countries.
Williamson said the U.S. is aware of the complexities of the
Schengen issue and pledges to work with EU partners as they
address these concerns. Chevallier said the GOF was also
concerned about recent USG talks with Lithuania on detainees
(ref d). France, he cautioned, was standing firm on the
necessity of an EU process before implementation of bilateral
agreements between the USG and EU member states on the
matter. Williamson noted that recent public pledges by
Lithuania to accept Guantanamo detainees were the result of
almost two years of talks, and that Lithuania has been firm
that implementation of an agreement to accept detainees would
occur only after agreement of a common EU position.
¶2. (S/NF) SUMMARY CONTINUED: Chevallier noted French concern
that former detainees, after being released from Guantanamo,
could return to or become involved in terrorist activities.
Williamson noted that of the approximately 60 detainees for
whom the U.S. was seeking resettlement all had been
previously approved for transfer. Chevallier asked if there
were any USG plans to transfer detainees to other parts of
the U.S. without the promise of a swift trial and if the U.S.
was going to accept some of these low-risk detainees.
Chevallier claimed that the more information France had
regarding these issues the better able it would be to
persuade the French public and other EU member states by
highlighting U.S. efforts to resettle the detainees.
Williamson replied that the interagency review process headed
by the Attorney General would try to answer these and other
questions regarding the detainees. Chevallier gave his
support to help with future meetings on this issue with the
French ministries of justice and the interior. END SUMMARY.
¶3. (SBU) S/WCI Ambassador Clint Williamson met on February 16
with French MFA advisors to the foreign minister Eric
Chevallier and Sylvie Pantz, as well as with MFA Desk Officer
for Strategic Affairs Camille Petit. Charg Mark Pekala,
Embassy poloff and Shaun Coughlin (S/WCI) also participated.
Detainees: French Open to Helping U.S.
--------------------------------------
¶4. (S/NF) In response to President Obama's January 22
Executive Order to close detention facilities at Guantanamo
Bay Naval Base (ref a), French FM Kouchner publicly gave his
support to review the idea of accepting detainees deemed not
to be a security risk (ref b). S/WCI Ambassador Williamson
followed up with advisors to the French foreign minister on
February 16 to seek GOF cooperation on the resettlement of
Guantanamo detainees. Williamson noted that President Obama
and Secretary Clinton strongly believe closing the detention
center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba is a critical foreign policy
issue facing the USG. Secretary Clinton asked Williamson to
meet with European partners to explain the USG position on
this matter since the change of administration. Williamson
thanked France for its help on this issue, noting that France
has a unique role to play in formulating a process within the
European Union (EU) to accept detainees and helping assuage
the concerns of member states that might stymie EU consensus
on the issue.
¶5. (S/NF) Foreign Ministry spokesman Eric Chevallier
reiterated France's willingness to assist the U.S. on this
issue (ref b and c), but clarified the GOF position:
detainees would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis; the
detainee had to specifically request resettlement in France;
and France would need full information on interested
detainees in order to review any security and judicial
implications. Chevallier said the GOF was "happy, in
principal" that the prison would be closed, but noted that
any agreement by France to accept detainees could not be
centered on discussions of "numbers" (i.e., France, and other
EU members, cannot be told they have to accept a specific
number of detainees).
French Stress Importance of Common EU Position
--------------------------------------------- -
¶6. (S/NF) Chevallier said the GOF supports an open EU process
that would allow decisions to be made on a national basis,
similar to what the Czech Republic has been proposing. The
most important issue, he said, would be addressing concerns
among Schengen countries. Williamson said the U.S. was aware
of the complexities of the Schengen issue and pledged to work
with EU partners as they address these concerns. Williamson
said the USG was concerned about the potential for any EU
process to drag out, especially by EU member states that did
not want to accept detainees. The USG hopes that France
could play an important role to assuage these concerns.
Chevallier noted that while there would not be complete
consensus within the EU on whether to accept detainees the
GOF would push other EU member states to be more open. There
was room for EU evolution in a common position, he said.
Williamson also noted that EU members Ireland and Portugal
were wary of an EU process that did not allow for
flexibility, as what happened when both of these countries
were directed by the EU to take Palestinian militants
involved in the 2002 siege of the Church of the Nativity in
Bethlehem. Chevallier said that Church of the Nativity
scenario was unlikely to happen again. Rather, a solution
such as what the Czechs were now proposing seemed more likely
as it hinged on flexibility.
¶7. (S/NF) Chevallier said the GOF was also concerned about
recent USG talks with Lithuania on the matter (ref d); he
hoped Williamson could provide him with more details on those
discussions. Regarding Lithuania, Williamson noted that
recent public statements by that government to accept
Guantanamo detainees were the result of almost two years of
talks. He said that Lithuania was interested in accepting
some of the Uzbek detainees because these detainees -- as was
deemed by the GOL -- could best fit into Lithuanian society
due to a common language and the presence of a large Uzbek
population in the country. Williamson clarified that the GOL
intended to implement a decision to accept these detainees
only once an EU framework had been agreed on. Williamson
also explained that the U.S. would continue to pursue
bilateral discussions with interested states as the EU
process progressed. He said that it would create inordinate
delays if bilateral discussions had to be put on hold until
the EU process was completed, and stressed that this was
entirely consistent with the preferred Czech approach of
creating a "permissive EU environment in which member states
could decide to accept detainees." Chevallier agreed that
this was a logical way forward.
Detainees: French Concerns about Security
-----------------------------------------
¶8. (S/NF) Sylvie Pantz said the GOF was concerned about the
reliability of information now available on detainees. She
said that the GOF would need as much case information as
possible in order to make a proper assessment. Pantz noted
that recent requests by the NGO community -- Reprieve and
Human Rights Watch -- to the GOF to accept detainees lacked
details, which made it difficult to verify claims of abuse
and assess security concerns. She was hoping the U.S. could
help fill these gaps. Williamson noted that a major change
within the Obama administration's approach was moving lead
responsibility for detainee status reviews from the
Department of Defense to the Department of Justice. The
Attorney General would now lead the interagency process.
Williamson said the process would ensure that all information
pertaining to a detainee was compiled in one place, that
fresh reviews of the material would take place in order to
determine prosecutability and that renewed threat assessments
would be undertaken. He said the USG was happy to facilitate
visits to Guantanamo to interview detainees who might be
resettled, as well as share medical and case records. So
far, he noted, there were 60 low-risk detainees who had been
previously approved for transfer and it was unlikely the
security assessment for these individuals would be raised,
although it was possible.
¶9. (S/NF) Pantz and Chevallier asked about recent reports of
detainees who, after being released, return to or become
involved in terrorist activities. Chevallier said there were
concerns in France that detainees determined to be low-risk
before entering Guantanamo could, depending on their
experiences in the detention center, pose serious risks to
security once released. Williamson said that out of the 525
detainees already released, over 500 returned to their home
countries. Forty to 60 of these individuals were thought to
have engaged in some sort of terrorist actions, ranging from
minor to larger acts, such as reports of detainees returning
to the battlefield in Iraq or Afghanistan. However, he
noted, all of these cases had been previously assessed as
higher risk, which was very different from the detainees for
whom the U.S. was now seeking to resettle. Williamson said
threat level assessments were based on the present state of
the detainee, taking into account interviews, psychiatric
evaluations and other reviews. He indicated that the one
other case of low-threat detainee resettlements, to Albania,
had gone well and that the eight former detainees had
assimilated to varying degrees into life there. Further,
France could be assured that the U.S. would share any
security concerns regarding the detainees with its friends
and allies.
French Questions about U.S. Plans to Resettle Detainees
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶10. (S/NF) Chevallier asked if there were any USG plans to
transfer high-risk detainees to the U.S. without the promise
of a swift trial. He also asked if the U.S. was going to
accept some of the low-risk detainees. Chevallier noted that
more information France had regarding these issues the better
able it would be to persuade the French public and other EU
member states by highlighting U.S. efforts to find a solution
to the detainee issue. Williamson replied that the
interagency review process would try to answer these and
other questions regarding the detainees. That aside, he said
the Obama administration realizes it would be a bad idea to
simply move detainees from one place to another as it would
not adequately address the problem. Pantz asked whether
detainees who could not return home but were seeking to be
resettled would simply receive a wish list of potential
accepting countries. Williamson said the U.S. was looking
into options to establish links with potential accepting
nations and the detainee, such as what was recently done with
the Uzbeks and Lithuania, but clarified that the USG was
reluctant to simply ask detainees where they would like to go
as it could complicate the resettlement process.
Future Talks: Offer to Help
---------------------------
¶11. (S/NF) Chevallier suggested that for future visits
Williamson should also speak to representatives from the
French ministries of justice and the interior. He said the
MFA would take the lead on setting up these meetings for
Williamson,s next visit to France.
¶12. (U) SWCI Williamson has cleared this message.
PEKALA