

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05NEWDELHI9527, THE TRIBAL BILL - A UPA ATTEMPT AT SOCIAL
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05NEWDELHI9527.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05NEWDELHI9527 | 2005-12-20 10:10 | 2011-03-24 01:01 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy New Delhi |
Appears in these articles: http://www.thehindu.com/news/the-india-cables/article1565519.ece |
VZCZCXRO0880
RR RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHLH RUEHPW
DE RUEHNE #9527/01 3541004
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 201004Z DEC 05
FM AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7636
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 9312
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO 2424
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 2445
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 5277
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL 2142
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 3080
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 7424
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 5796
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 2490
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL CALCUTTA 0396
RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 0034
RUEHKP/AMCONSUL KARACHI 1319
RUEHLH/AMCONSUL LAHORE 1851
RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI 9304
RUEHPW/AMCONSUL PESHAWAR 2544
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEIDN/DNI WASHINGTON DC
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0284
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHHJJPI/PACOM IDHS HONOLULU HI
RHMFISS/HQ USSOCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 05 NEW DELHI 009527
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/20/2015
TAGS: PGOV PINR PHUM KCRM ASEC SCUL SENV KSCA TSPL
EAGR, IN
SUBJECT: THE TRIBAL BILL - A UPA ATTEMPT AT SOCIAL
ENGINEERING
REF: A. NEW DELHI 9245
¶B. NEW DELHI 5068 C. NEW DELHI 4953 D. NEW DELHI 4759 E. NEW DELHI 4673
Classified By: Charge Robert Blake, Jr. for Reasons 1.4 (B, D)
¶1. (C) Summary: India's forest dwelling tribals (aboriginals largely residing in Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand, Orissa, Chhattisgarh Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra) are caught in a vise between greedy forest mafias and the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist), which hopes to enlist them into its violent campaign to oppose multinational corporations (MNC's) attempting to establish projects in tribal areas. The UPA hope to win votes in key states by addressing the long-standing and deep-rooted exploitation of India's Scheduled Tribes (STs) through a Bill that would grant STs the right to own forest land and subsist off of forest resources. In addition to the electoral benefits, the UPA hopes that this will encourage tribals to protect and preserve India's rapidly shrinking forests. The issue is pressing, as non-tribals, aided and abetted by government officials, use corruption and coercion to remove tribals illegally from the forests and gain access to resources. Some of our environmentalist contacts oppose the bill, believing the GOI is not sufficiently committed to the environment and the STs to ensure proper implementation of such a bill if it passes. The most likely outcome will be more violence, as desperate tribals see no recourse but to turn to the Maoists to ensure their survival. This cable deals with the political aspects of the bill, a more detailed analysis of its provisions follows septel. End Summary.
A Far-Reaching Bill
-------------------
¶2. (U) On December 13, Tribal Affairs Minister PR Kyndiah introduced the Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill to Parliament. The Minister emphasized that the UPA believes the Bill will ""grant a secure and inalienable right to those communities whose right to life depends on the forests and strengthen the entire conservation system regime by giving a permanent stake to the Schedule Tribes (STs) dwelling in the forest for generations in symbiotic relationship with the ecosystem."" Kyndiah pointed out that the bill is meant to correct an ""injustice,"" as a segment of India's STs have lived in the forests for generations without clear title to the land they occupy.
With Extensive Rights
---------------------
¶3. (U) The Bill is an ambitious attempt at social engineering which aims to provide clear rights to STs, while seeking to preserve India's fast-shrinking forests. It hopes to accomplish this by granting ""forest dwelling"" tribals clear title to the lands they occupy, while compelling them to act as stewards. The Bill extends to STs the right to own and occupy sufficient land for their habitation and subsistence (no more than 2.5 hectares), and the right to grow food and graze their animals on their property. The Bill specifies that the land can be passed on to descendants but cannot be sold or transferred, and no one can evict STs NEW DELHI 00009527 002 OF 005 without a proper ""recognition and verification procedure.""
And Clear Obligations
---------------------
¶4. (U) In exchange for these rights, the ST-held land would be confined to ""bonafide livelihood purposes"" and ""not for exclusive commercial purposes,"" and STs would be responsible for ""protection, conservation and regeneration of forests."" Tribals would not be allowed to engage in any activity that adversely affects the wild life, forest and the biodiversity in the area. STs that fail to live up to their obligations would be brought before tribal councils. For their first offense they could be fined 1,000 rupees (USD 22), and would lose their land if they committed subsequent offenses. The Bill also contains a clause exempting officers of the state and central governments from prosecution or civil suits ""for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under the act.""
The Political Genesis of the Bill
---------------------------------
¶5. (C) Conservationists claim the bill,s hidden agenda is to capture the hitherto unaligned tribals' votes for Congress. Environmental lawyer Sudhir Mishra explained that the bill originated in a small-scale tribal land-distribution model implemented by then Congress Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh Digvijay Singh seven years ago. The idea quickly gained momentum after Congress President Sonia Gandhi eagerly adopted it last year, leading to a bill drafted in only five days, in complete secrecy, by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs. In Delhi political circles the bill is attributed to the same National Advisory Council cabal that authored the ill-regarded Employment Guarantee Act. Political contacts tell us that while the BJP is strongly opposed to the Bill, it has determined that it is now too risky to oppose it openly, with BJP President LK Advani supposedly stating &How come we (the BJP) did not think about doing this?8
Nothing to Lose Here for the Congress-Led Coalition
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶6. (C) The UPA has embraced the bill as a win-win situation, noting that if the bill gets through, tribals will align themselves with the ruling coalition. If the bill fails to pass, the UPA can still claim to be the champions of the tribal cause and win tribal votes. Despite this, the Tribal Bill has caused a split within Congress. Although the bill is a pet-project of Sonia Gandhi, her son and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi is a member of the Tiger and Wilderness Watch group, a formation of MP,s that opposes the bill as a danger to wildlife. (Comment: Congress may have overestimated the potential electoral impact of the bill. The NDA just carried Bihar and there are currently BJP/NDA governments in Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, and Orissa, all with large tribal populations. It is far from certain that this Bill would reverse years of systematic BJP cultivation of tribals. end comment.)
The Prime Minister Pushed to the Fore
-------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Prime Minister Singh is actively pressing for
NEW DELHI 00009527 003 OF 005
passage of the Tribal Bill. As head of the National Board for Wildlife, he became deeply involved in the tiger issue (reftels B-E) and formed a special task force to study the issue. The task force includes a number of liberal activists such as Sunita Narain (a personal friend of the PM) who are outspoken proponents of &tribal rights.8 They have purportedly convinced the PM that the tiger issue and the Tribal Bill are linked, and that the Bill will redress historical grievances and save tigers.
Opponents are Appalled
----------------------
¶8. (U) The Bill was drafted by a ""Technical Support Group"" of tribal activists recruited by the Tribal Ministry. The Ministry of Forests and Environment (MoEF) objected that it was not involved in the drafting process, and predicted that the Bill would result in wholesale destruction of forest resources. All serious environmental groups, as well as MoEF staff privately fume that the Bill is a cynical attempt to tap the tribal vote bank that will ultimately only bring irreparable harm to protected areas and further constrict the available tiger prey base. Tiger activist Valmik Thapar argued that if implemented the bill would ignite violent land disputes between tribes and clans and between tribals and non-tribals, opening the door for wholesale destruction of remaining forest lands by India's greedy land and forest mafias. (Comment: From a conservation science perspective, we agree that increased human usage of sensitive park areas will only increase opportunities for conflict between men and animals, reducing available prey and further shrinking range areas for highly solitary cats like tigers. end comment.)
¶9. (U) Indian conservatives also opposed the Bill, arguing that it would impede India's economic development. A ""Pioneer"" editorial argued that India does not need a tribal bill, but rather ""a concrete plan of action for the development of forested regions."" It derided UPA claims that STs had been denied land rights as a ""myth."" Arguing that many STs work hand in glove with the mafias to loot the forests, the editorial contended that the MoEF, not the tribals, will prevent forest destruction.
Proponents are Enthusiastic
---------------------------
¶10. (U) The Bill is the project of ""tribal activists"" and Left ideologues from the UPA and Left Front (LF). They argue that it corrects a historical wrong, as under the British and then independent India, the state was more interested in exploiting the forests as an economic resource than preserving the rights and way of life of the STs residing there. They also argue that without clear title to forest land, MNC's and Indian industrial houses will expel tribals to gain access to their land and forest resources. Tribal activist Marianus Kujur claimed that industrial houses have already launched more than 40 projects requiring 30,713 acres of forest land, and that the MoEF and industrialists plan to ultimately take over almost four million acres. Kujur maintained that once tribals have land rights, they will protect the forests and wildlife and stand up to the forest mafias and their political patrons.
¶11. (C) Opponents contend that the drafters failed to study
NEW DELHI 00009527 004 OF 005 the effect of similar programs in Brazil and Central Africa that encouraged slash-and-burn farming by subsistence farmers. There is already considerable evidence to indicate that India's tribals are not innately interested in conserving the environment. For example, the Bodos were given administrative control of part of Assam, and began a wholesale program of deforestation that devastated the forests in the Manas National Park.
Naxalites in the Background
---------------------------
¶12. (C) The Naxalites are the unmentioned third player in the argument. The Communist Party of India (Maoist) and other Naxalite groups are active in many of the areas covered by the bill, and claim to represent the interests of the STs (reftel A). On December 15 the CPI(Maoist) Central Committee warned corporate investors to stay out of the tribal areas and stop ""forcibly displacing people,"" or face the consequences. The CPI(Maoist) said it would attack any company attempting to set up a project in the tribal belts of Jharkhand, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. A CPI(Maoist) spokesman claimed that ""MNC interests have triggered state-aided brutal area-domination exercises to sanitize tribal-held land so that industries can be set up there. We intend to hit back strongly.""
¶13. (C) Many liberal ideologues in the UPA support the Bill out of concern for the environment and the STs. It also appeals to the Congress Party's traditional inclination towards government-driven solutions to economic problems. Left Front supporters of the UPA are concerned about preventing a Naxalite resurgence. The CPI(Marxist) and the CPI(Maoist) are bitter enemies and both want to cultivate the STs. LF leaders see the STs as futurE voters when and if the Communist parties expand into new areas, and hope the Tribal Bill will bring them into the electoral process and out of the ranks of the Naxalites.
Comment - Tribals Caught in a Vise
----------------------------------
¶14. (C) The tribals who inhabit forest areas have been traditionally exploited and abused by the majority population. India's rapidly expanding population and growing economy have worsened the tribals plight by increasing pressure on shrinking forest areas and their resources. Many non-tribals view the STs as an obstacle to development who must be removed from forest lands and ""integrated"" into the mainstream (largely as landless laborers at the bottom of the social ladder). Having ignored this vulnerable population for decades, the UPA sees votes now in trying to correct a set of long-standing and deeply-rooted social problems through an ambitious Bill that reflects the views of the academically oriented social engineers at the National Advisory Council (NAC). In our estimation, should the Bill become law, it will likely fail to meet its ambitious objectives as it runs into the entrenched and corrupt interests exploiting the forests. India's poorly motivated and often corrupt bureaucracy cannot be counted on to administer a bill aimed at protecting the environment and tribals, which the vast majority of Indians care little or nothing about. Nor does it appear that anyone with the NAC NEW DELHI 00009527 005 OF 005 has asked tribals their views, or studied their land-usage patterns.
¶15. (C) The GOI's unwillingness and inability to make the difficult decisions required to prevent destruction of the forests and end the exploitation and victimization of tribals plays into the hands of the Naxalites. The tribals are caught in a vise, with greedy industrialists and mafias working together to push them off their land and exploit forest resources on one side, and a violent Maoist insurrection on the other. Most tribals have little or no faith that the GOI will protect them, and over time may see little alternative but to turn to the Maoists as the best of a bad set of choices.
¶16. (U) Visit New Delhi's Classified Website: (http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/sa/newdelhi/)
BLAKE.