

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08USNATO251, JULY EAPC: OSCE BRIEF, UNSCR 1325, DEFENSE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08USNATO251.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08USNATO251 | 2008-07-17 10:10 | 2011-04-24 00:12 | CONFIDENTIAL | Mission USNATO |
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHNO #0251/01 1991003
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 171003Z JUL 08
FM USMISSION USNATO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2078
INFO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KYIV IMMEDIATE 0132
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 6010
RUEHVJ/AMEMBASSY SARAJEVO IMMEDIATE 0144
RUEHSQ/AMEMBASSY SKOPJE IMMEDIATE 3399
RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI IMMEDIATE 5625
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEHNO/USDELMC BRUSSELS BE IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/USNMR SHAPE BE IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L USNATO 000251
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/09/2018
TAGS: PREL MARR NATO AORC AM AJ RU GG SW FI AF
SUBJECT: JULY EAPC: OSCE BRIEF, UNSCR 1325, DEFENSE
EDUCATION AND TRAINING
Classified By: Charge d'Affaires Richard G. Olson, Jr.
for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (C) Summary: During their July 9 meeting, EuroAtlantic
Partnership Council (EAPC) Ambassadors exchanged views with
OSCE Secretary General Marc Perrin de Brichambaut, covering
issues such as Afghanistan, Kosovo, and Georgia. The EAPC
also received a briefing on defense education and training
from Partnership for Peace Consortium Chairman Henri Bigo and
discussed next steps in implementing UNSCR 1325 on women,
peace and security. In a separate meeting with the Charge, de
Brichambaut said the Russians had specifically asked him to
pass on their offer to support the U.S. desire for increased
OSCE cooperation on Afghanistan, in exchange for unspecified
concessions in other areas. End summary.
OSCE Secretary General's Presentation
-------------------------------------
¶2. (C) OSCE SYG Marc Perrin de Brichambaut told the EAPC that
NATO and the OSCE have a shared interest in promoting
stability. He said the last 12 months have tested the
commitment of nations to the OSCE principles at the most
basic level. After highlighting the challenges facing the
OSCE in election monitoring and assisting with the unresolved
conflicts in Georgia, de Brichambaut shared his fear that the
"deeply rooted impasse" in Kosovo may have entered a long
period of ambiguity. De Brichambaut expressed his belief that
international action is vital to protect human rights and
fundamental freedoms in the Balkans. He also observed that
OSCE action in Afghanistan and Central Asia was a part of the
long term effort to consolidate security and democracy in
these areas. De Brichambaut said OSCE effectiveness in
Afghanistan will depend on the support of international
organizations, other key countries, and Russia. De
Brichambaut said the impasse over Russian suspension of the
Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty concerns the entire OCSE
community due to the importance of military transparency.
Finally de Brichambaut asserted that the OSCE itself can only
be effective insofar as the member states use it as a
toolbox. He argued that political-military considerations
cannot exist independently from economic and human-dimension
concerns. In conclusion he said he looked forward to closer
work with NATO, including through staff-to-staff
consultations.
¶3. (C) In response, Finland said that enhancing OSCE-NATO
cooperation is a priority for its chairmanship of the OSCE.
Austria, Spain, Germany and France asked what the OSCE could
do to enhance its role in Afghanistan, with Spain and Germany
specifically mentioning elections as an area to focus on.
Spain, Greece, and Hungary asked about OSCE activity in
Kosovo, while the Serbian representative took this
opportunity to express his thanks for a statement in 2007 by
de Brichambaut that Kosovo could become a precedent. Serbia
also expressed "profound gratitude" to the countries present
that had not recognized Kosovo. Russia said the OSCE should
play an adequate role in international security, and hoped
nations could work together to creatively solve the CFE
impasse.
¶4. (C) Georgia expressed gratitude to the OSCE SYG, saying
the OSCE had been helpful in the separatist conflicts. The
Czech Republic supported this view and called for more OSCE,
EU, and UN attention in the South Caucasus. Russia expressed
concern about escalating tensions in Georgia adding that
Moscow could not agree with the suggestion that peacekeeping
formats for the separatist conflicts be changed.
¶5. (C) Armenia spoke of the OSCE as a key asset for conflict
resolution, prompting Azerbaijan to assert its commitment to
democracy, human, rights and the rule of law. Azerbaijan and
Armenia traded well-known positions on the situation in
Nagorno Karabakh, causing other delegations to roll their
eyes at the proceedings.
¶6. (C) U.S. Charge Olson deployed guidance praising the work
of OSCE in promoting human rights and democratic elections in
Europe and Eurasia. Olson highlighted the work of ODIHR,
which, he said, is at the forefront of promoting, protecting
and defending shared values that are critical to democracy
and democratic development. He called on the OSCE to play a
proactive and creative role in working on the frozen
conflicts. The U.S. also strongly supported the OSCE's
engagement in Afghanistan, asserting that activities must
take place inside of Afghanistan to have any real impact.
OSCE Secretary General's Bilat with the U.S. Charge
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶7. (C) In a separate meeting with Charge Olson, de
Brichambaut suggested that the Russians were not yet in
support of the OSCE proposals for Afghanistan. He said the
Russians had directly asked him why "the U.S. does not ask us
directly to support their proposal" and that they had added
that if the U.S. were to do so "we will see what we might ask
of them." He said Russia had asked him to relay that message
directly to the U.S. He did not know what specifically they
might be seeking from the U.S., but was clear that the
Russians see the U.S. as the demandeur on this program.
¶8. (C) Charge Olson replied that the U.S. tries to avoid
linked deals of the sort the Russians seem to be seeking.
While the Russians repeatedly try to initiate negotiations of
this kind, the U.S. usually resists their efforts to make a
grand bargain and prefers to stick to the specifics of an
issue. The SYG noted that the Russians should ideally
realize that secure borders for Afghanistan were in Russia's
interest too. The SYG's Chief of Staff Paul Fritch remarked
that involvement of the CSTO was the most obvious demand the
Russians would seek. The Charge responded that such a request
would likely be a bridge too far in a NATO context.
¶9. (C) Olson stressed the importance of the OSCE program
operating inside Afghanistan. De Brichambaut replied that he
would have to take things one step at a time -- once the
program is approved the OSCE can look at other options, such
as increasing the presence inside Afghanistan and training
the Afghan customs force. Reacting to the comments of
several nations in the EAPC meeting that the OSCE should play
a role in assisting with the set up of the Afghan elections,
the SYG said he would discuss the possibility with the head
of ODHIR and thought it would be politically and financially
feasible.
¶10. (C) The SYG said he has been telling the Russians that,
if they were serious about Medvedev's proposal for a European
Security Treaty, they would need to define it more and decide
in which venue it will be discussed. The SYG said he had
discussed with Russian Deputy FM Grushko the possibility of
using OSCE Vienna as the venue. Grushko had told him Russia
felt it could not wait until the next U.S. administration to
begin talks on this issue.
¶11. (C) The SYG asked about the July 18 Friends of Kosovo
meeting in Brussels, saying he had been hearing from many
participants that they are not expecting much to come out of
it. Olson explained the background to the meeting, stressing
that an OSCE and UN presence were important as a way to give
cover to the Turks to allow the EU and NATO to have a meeting
together. The SYG said he would have to protect the Finnish
Presidency from Russian anger about the OSCE participating,
but still thought the OSCE would be able to attend.
Defense Education and Training - Resources Needed
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶12. (C) During the EAPC Ambassadorial, Mr. Henry Bigo,
Executive Director of the PfP Consortium of Defense Academies
and Security Studies Institute, briefed on EAPC/PfP education
and training goals, programs, and activities. Bigo also
encouraged the EAPC to take a good look at the published Food
for Thought paper (e-mailed to EUR-RPM), which provides the
"way-ahead" for the PfP Consortium. He reminded Ambassadors
that the Consortium relies on a small budget (less than USD
1M per year) and could benefit from additional assistance.
¶13. (C) Bigo requested three areas of assistance from the
EAPC: (I) A broader base of contributor nations to the
Consortium; (II) Direct-funding by Partner nations to their
defense colleges, institutions, and faculty to serve PfP
Consortium projects, education, and training. (III)
Voluntary contributions of national staff for the Consortium.
(Bigo did not request a specific number, but noted that they
currently rely on 3 full-time staff members).
¶14. (C) The Secretary General - assisted by Canada - provided
additional background on the Canadian-led PAP-DIB (Defense
Institution Building) Reference Curriculum that aims to
provide NATO partner and emerging partner nations with
in-depth learning objectives and curriculum support on
building and reforming defense institutions. The Curriculum
centers on three themes: public administration and
governance, defense management and economics, and ethics and
leadership.
¶15. (C) EAPC Partners were quick to support the initiatives
and activities of the PfP Consortium. The U.S. noted support
for the program, encouraged specificity of programming to
Partnership requirements, and requested that activities be
linked to an EAPC Work Plan, IPAP, or PfP PARP criteria.
This theme of "tailoring activities towards Partners'
requirements" was echoed by other nations including
Switzerland, Romania, Georgia, and Azerbaijan. Mr. Bigo
later indicated that it is the Consortium's intent to tailor
activities to Partner nations' needs and requirements.
¶16. (C) The SECGEN concluded the discussion by appealing to
EAPC nations to review their contributions and assistance,
noting that, "high quality education and training cannot be
made available on the cheap."
UNSCR 1325 - Guidelines and a Policy to be Developed
Sweden to lead a PRT Study in Afghanistan
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶17. (C) The SYG announced that Allies had decided to adopt
the following approach in developing NATO,s commitment to
the principles of UNSCR 1325:
(I) The International Military Staff (IMS) will task Allied
Command Operations and Allied Command Transformation with
developing "bi-strategic guidelines" that will provide
pragmatic guidance to commanders and their troops.
(II) The NATO International Staff (IS) and the IMS will work
together to develop a policy paper, drawing on national and
international organizational experience.
(III) An ad-hoc working group of Allies (membership to be
determined) will meet to consider the policy, and will then
consult with partners.
(IV) The final paper would be returned to the North Atlantic
Council for endorsement.
¶18. (C) Allies and Partners welcomed this approach but many
also expressed frustration that it had taken so long to reach
this point. Austria, Canada, Sweden, Denmark, Finland,
Norway, Switzerland, Montenegro, Spain, France and Germany
all spoke of their national support for UNSCR 1325 and looked
forward to progress. France suggested EU work on the issue
could inspire a coherent approach. Swedish Ambassador
Veronika Wand Danielsson announced that Denmark, Finland, the
Netherlands, Norway and Sweden will conduct a joint study on
improving the effectiveness of PRTs in Afghanistan in
applying UNSCR 1325. The study is to be completed by Spring
¶2009. Wand Danielsson hoped that all Allies and Partners
would support this work, including by accepting researchers
into their PRTs (Note: In a follow up conversation with the
Swedish Mission to NATO, PolOff learned that planning for
this effort is at the earliest stages. The group plans to
meet in Stockholm in September to launch the project
proposal, as well as to plan the study trips. Sweden's
minutes of the group's initial meeting have been forwarded to
EUR/RPM. This development will undoubtedly lead to requests
for U.S. assistance. End note.)
OLSON