

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON181, FIXING THE BIG CITY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON181.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON181 | 2009-06-26 03:03 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO0648
RR RUEHAP RUEHDT RUEHNZ RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0181/01 1770356
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 260358Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0022
INFO ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA 0005
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 0009
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0011
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 0008
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000181
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KDEM NZ
SUBJECT: FIXING THE BIG CITY
WELLINGTON 00000181 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) The Auckland region, New Zealand's commercial center and
home to a third of the country's population, is governed by a
patchwork of institutions - four city councils and mayors, two
district councils and an overarching regional council. These
overlapping and competing authorities slow decision-making and hobble
the city's development at taxpayers' expense.
¶2. (SBU) In 2007, the previous Labour government tasked the city's
leaders to come up with a new governance plan. Their proposed
changes were mostly cosmetic and designed to protect existing
political fiefs. Unimpressed with the product but not wanting to
deal with the issue during an election campaign, the Labour
government punted the job to a Royal Commission of three eminences
grises, with a mandate to come up with a new plan after the November
2008 national elections.
¶3. (SBU) After extensive consultations, the Royal Commission issued
its report in March. It called for the establishment of a single
city council with a popularly elected mayor and some council seats
set aside for Maori. Existing city and district councils would be
replaced by six local councils covering the same localities as the
current city and district councils. They would be subordinate to the
new greater Auckland council but still authorized to raise and spend
money independently.
¶4. (SBU) Within weeks, the National-led government in Wellington,
via Local Government Minister Rodney Hide, leader of the small ACT
Party, set aside much of the Royal Commission's plan and put forward
a more radical proposal. Hide proposed a single city council -
without Maori seats - and a popularly elected mayor. The six
proposed local council were eliminated, to be replaced instead with
20-30 community boards that would have very minor responsibilities
(graffiti and pet control) and would otherwise be limited to an
advisory role. The new governance structure is to be in place by
October 2010.
OXEN GET GORED
--------------
¶5. (SBU) Initial reaction was predictable. Current Auckland City
Mayor John Banks, a minister in an earlier National government and
frontrunner (to the extent there is one) for mayor of the new
"supercity," praised the government's plan. The mayors and council
members from the other current city and district councils, who will
be out of their jobs if the plan is implemented, spluttered in
outrage. The New Zealand Herald's op-ed pages have been filled with
columns penned by various mayors, deputy mayors, and city councilors
decrying Wellington's attack on local democracy. The decision has
also upset community activists concerned their neighborhood interests
and pet projects will be overlooked by a top-heavy city government.
¶6. (SBU) The Maori community condemned the government's elimination
of Maori seats, but Maori Party co-leader Pita Sharples' response was
nuanced. He objected to the elimination of the Maori seats, but took
pains to add that the disagreement would not affect the Maori Party's
confidence and supply agreement with National. The protests from
local Maori tribes were more pointed and a protest march (hikoi) was
called for late May. The 6,000-strong hikoi managed to close down a
few blocks of downtown Auckland on May 25 but PM Key dismissed it.
A STUMBLE, BUT A SMALL ONE
--------------------------
¶7. (SBU) The government seems taken aback by reaction to the
supercity plan, but it is not clear how seriously the government has
stumbled. The government has dropped hints that, when the enabling
legislation moves through parliament, there may be room for tweaking,
including a way to guarantee Maori representation on the new council.
While the opposition Labour Party has been trying to make political
hay out of the issue, strong opposition remains limited to Maori and
community activists. Media interest in the issue is fading. One
Auckland MP confirmed a view held by many: the average Aucklander
cares little about the governance debate so long as the outcome
delivers better traffic and lower taxes. A recent public opinion
poll showed Aucklanders were evenly split on the supercity concept,
but feelings among the general public on the issue do not seem
particularly strong. Outside Auckland, the debate attracts barely
any interest at all.
¶8. (SBU) One analyst suggested that the Maori Party's protest was
muted because Sharples has bigger fish to fry. This observer
suggested that Sharples is hoarding his political capital to expend
WELLINGTON 00000181 002.2 OF 003
on social and welfare issues more important to the Maori community.
By largely giving National a pass regarding Maori seats in Auckland,
he has earned points with PM Key that he can spend later.
BAD POLITICS?
-------------
¶9. (SBU) Some observers suggest that National has made bad decisions
both for itself and for the people of Auckland. One local government
expert from one of Auckland's big law firms noted that National's
rejection of the Royal Commission proposal meant that National had
taken ownership of Auckland governance issue. Given that few
analysts expect any form of local government reform to have much
impact on Aucklanders' tax bills and traffic woes, that may have been
a mistake. Had National simply implemented the Labour-appointed
Royal Commission plan, it could have dealt with Aucklanders'
inevitable disappointment by shifting the blame to Labour and the
Commission. At least one Auckland politician agreed, arguing that
while there were no votes to be won in redesigning Auckland's
government, there were at least a few votes to be lost.
¶10. (SBU) Auckland University Professor Ray Miller sounded a similar
theme, warning that National was identifying itself with a policy
drawn up by Hide. Hide's party drew only 3.7% of the vote in last
year's election and, argued Miller, Hide is not very popular with the
New Zealand electorate and is not trusted by his National
counterparts in cabinet. Hide's pro-business attitudes open the
government up to accusations that it is backing a plan meant to
promote a business takeover of Auckland's government. According to
this argument, only the wealthiest candidates will be able to mount
serious campaigns in a constituency of 1.4 million. (By comparison,
the population of Auckland City, the largest of the Auckland region's
current municipalities, is about 450,000.)
A BAD PLAN?
-----------
¶11. (SBU) Some experts in local government see a fundamental flaw in
both the Commission and government plans. Both plans opt for what
experts describe a "weak mayor" model. The mayor will get to appoint
his/her deputy and committee chairs and propose the budget, but the
mayor's authority will not be nearly as strong as that of London's
mayor, for example. Experts point with concern to Toronto, which
implemented municipal reform similar to that proposed for Auckland
and has been left with a divided council with a mayor too weak to
resolve disputes. It is certainly hard to see how a council that
included the four current mayors - different from each other in both
temperament and philosophy - could succeed.
ALTERING THE AUCKLAND-WELLINGTON DYNAMIC
----------------------------------------
¶12. (SBU) The impact of reform on the relationship between Auckland
and national politics remains to be seen. In New Zealand, local
government generally is not a stepping stone to higher levels of
government. While there are exceptions, mayoralties in New Zealand
are filled with politicians at the end, rather than the beginning, of
their careers. Likewise, members of city councils tend to limit
their focus to local issues. Last year's election to parliament of
Auckland City Councilman Peseta Sam Lotu-Liga is the exception rather
than the rule.
¶13. (SBU) A number of our interlocutors suggested that a supercity
might change all that. Traditionally, gaining a ministry required an
ambitious young politician to toil for years in the party hierarchy
and parliament's backbenches. That has already started to change, as
party leaders take advantage of the party list system to bring in
fresh blood. Some observers argue that a relatively junior
politician could avoid paying his dues in Wellington and pursue a
city-wide council seat or mayoralty in Auckland. A politician who
could succeed there, and demonstrate to party leaders that he can
capture a plurality in what will be by far the single largest
constituency in the country, could make a persuasive argument to
enter national politics at the ministerial level.
¶14. (SBU) Even if a reformed Auckland government does not become a
springboard to national office, many of our interlocutors hope it
might lead to better candidates at the local level. We heard many
complaints about the dismal quality of local government officials,
with the few noteworthy exceptions only drawing attention to the
mediocrity of the rest. A more authoritative government for the
entire Auckland region might draw more effective policymakers who
WELLINGTON 00000181 003.2 OF 003
consider pursuit of local office under the current structure to be a
waste of effort.
¶15. (SBU) Despite its weaknesses, reform may strengthen Auckland in
its dealings with the rest of the country. New Zealanders outside
the city tend to be wary of Auckland, believing it already gets too
much attention and too many resources compared to the rest of the
country. This is reflected in national politics, where some
politicians, such as former Finance Minister Michael Cullen, gain
reputations for being particularly "anti-Auckland." This infuriates
Auckland boosters, who point out the city contributes much more in
economic growth and tax revenues than it gets back in, for example,
funding for roads.
¶16. (SBU) One expert argued that even an imperfect supercity will be
better placed to battle for its interests in Wellington. He used a
recent example of a regional fuel tax. The previous Labour
government imposed a fuel tax for the Auckland region only, with the
proceeds to go to Auckland infrastructure. When gasoline prices
spiked last year, the tax became politically unsupportable and the
government withdrew it, without any indication of how it would
replace the badly-needed funding. Auckland's fragmented leadership
made no effective response. A mayor and city council from a single
Auckland supercity would have been better positioned to protect the
fuel tax or draw a commitment from the government that funds for the
needed infrastructure would be found elsewhere.
¶17. (SBU) The final shape of the supercity won't be seen for months,
after continued public debate and parliamentary hearings. The
hearings will keep the story in the newspaper, but it is unlikely to
return to the front pages soon. Prime Minister Key, a pragmatic
politician, will likely use the hearing process to make adjustments
to the new governance structure in order to appease key
constituencies like the Maori. Regardless of the final design, it
will be years before we learn whether the restructuring has created
the world class city everyone seems to agree New Zealand needs.
KEEGAN