

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA2970, CANADIAN STAKEHOLDERS' CONCERNS ON COPYRIGHT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA2970.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA2970 | 2005-10-04 18:06 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
041821Z Oct 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 002970
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DEPT PASS USTR FOR CHANDLER AND ESPINEL
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD KIPR CA
SUBJECT: CANADIAN STAKEHOLDERS' CONCERNS ON COPYRIGHT
AMENDMENT, SPECIAL 301 OCR, AND ENFORCEMENT
REF: A. OTTAWA 2833 (DEMARCHE ON SPECIAL 301
OUT-OF-CYCLE REVIEW)
¶B. SECSTATE 173476 (DEMARCHE ON SPECIAL 301
OUT-OF-CYCLE REVIEW)
¶C. OTTAWA 1168 (CANADIAN REACTION TO GOC'S PROPOSED
COPYRIGHT LAW AMENDMENTS)
¶1. (SBU) Summary: We have met again with intellectual
property (IP) rightsholders to discuss their views of GOC
moves on IPR. Canadian industry frustration with ineffective
IPR enforcement continues to grow, and further review of the
proposed copyright amendment legislation (C-60) has revealed
some complexities and emerging disagreement among
stakeholders. The Canadian Motion Picture Distributors
Association (CMPDA) also raised a new issue: camcording of
new-release movies in theaters, which seems to be a
significant problem in Canada. End Summary.
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COPYRIGHT ACT
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶2. (SBU) In our meetings with IP rightsholders in Ottawa and
Toronto, we found that most stakeholder concerns with C-60,
the draft legislation to amend Canada's Copyright Act, were
familiar (see Ottawa 1168). However, time has fine-tuned
industry concerns and highlighted subtle differences in
stakeholder positions.
¶3. (SBU) Internet Service Provider (ISP) Liability: For
example, while the current USG action plan and U.S.
stakeholders emphasize the need for a notice-and-takedown
regime, Canadian industry opinions are mixed on the need to
push for notice-and-takedown. The Canadian Motion Picture
Distributors Association (CMPDA) is satisfied with the
current notice-and-notice proposal in the draft legislation,
hoping that the record-keeping requirements for ISPs will
help their industry keep track of actions against online
infringers. In CMPDA's view, the advent of peer-to-peer
filesharing has lessened the need for notice-and-takedown,
since fewer users are downloading their files from large
websites of infringing material. On the other hand, the
Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA), Canadian
Alliance Against Software Theft (CAAST) and U.S.-based
Business Software Alliance (BSA) representatives strongly
believe that their industries still need a
notice-and-takedown regime. This divergence seems to depend
on how an industry's products are pirated and how
recalcitrant they anticipate the GOC will be on the issue.
Entertainment Software Association (ESA) representatives
opined that the GOC "isn't going to budge" on the issue of
notice-and-notice, possibly because of fears that a
notice-and-takedown regime could be unconstitutional in
Canada. C-60's general waiver of ISP liability was deemed
overly broad by all stakeholders; they felt that the waiver
of liability shouldn't be a blank check and that ISPs should
be held responsible for the content of their users' websites
once they become aware of the presence of copyright
infringing files.
¶4. (SBU) Trafficking in circumvention "tools" (devices and
software): Even in this area, which generally prompts a
chorus seeking a ban against trafficking in tools to
circumvent technological protection measures (TPM), industry
associations were not entirely in agreement. CMPDA, CRIA,
CAAST, and ESA are all firmly pushing for trafficking in TPM
circumvention tools to be made illegal. Currently the draft
legislation requires that the rightholder prove "intent to
infringe" for trafficking in tools to be illegal, and as one
industry representative points out, they already need to
prove intent and therefore this legislative change doesn't
give them any more ability to fight piracy. Industry
representatives would also like a law that allows them to go
after the larger-scale pirates selling circumvention tools,
rather than continuing to have to go after the "little guys"
who use them. However, the Information Technology Association
of Canada (ITAC) represents security firms who occasionally
circumvent TPMs, either to test their efficacy or to create
fixes for various holes in the security. ITAC says that
these niche activities need the protection of the "intent"
clause, although others argue that circumvention for reasons
other than infringement could be specifically exempted in the
legislation or could fall under 'fair use'. Prompted by its
cyber-security members, ITAC therefore opposes any move to
make trafficking in or creating TPM circumvention tools
illegal and supports the current requirement to prove intent
to infringe. (SBU comment: In an off-hand remark, an ITAC
VP mentioned that ITAC may feel the need to "push the other
side" to balance the anticipated lobbying from ESA, who will
push strongly for trafficking in circumvention tools to be
illegal regardless of intent. End comment.)
¶5. (SBU) Circumvention of TPMs intended to prevent access:
In what the CMPDA characterizes as a possible oversight in
the draft legislation, C-60 does not seem to make
circumvention of TPMs intended to prevent access (as opposed
to distribution) an offense. As with other issues of TPM
circumvention, the major industry associations hope to fix
this omission in the upcoming committee hearings on the draft
legislation.
¶6. (SBU) No criminal sanctions for infringement: CRIA, ESA
and CMPDA note that the WIPO treaties require "effective"
deterrents to copyright infringement. C-60 as drafted does
not provide any criminal provisions for circumvention, which
CRIA and CMPDA believe will mean that Canada does not have
adequate legal protection and effective remedies against
copyright infringement. An ESA representative pointed out
that the original Heritage Committee recommendations for
legislation included a recommendation for criminal provisions
for circumvention. (Comment: Per reftels, Heritage Canada's
stronger stance on IPR protection has been generally
undermined by Industry Canada's pressure for "balance." End
comment.)
¶7. (SBU) Can C-60 be saved?: One of the most contentious
insights that has arisen during recent consultations with IPR
stakeholders is the question of whether stakeholders even
want the bill to pass. Some industry representatives
predicted that the bill will "die on paper" and criticized
the potential for amending it in committee as likely to
result in "a mess". These representatives expressed the
expectation and hope that the legislation would be scrapped
and described as a best-case-scenario the legislation dying
after oral submissions (so that industries could make
comments.) On the other hand, when asked if they wanted the
bill to die, other industry representative seemed surprised
and explained that their members would rather see this draft
fixed, since if the bill dies, progress will be delayed for
another year.
CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
--------------------
¶8. (SBU) Numerous stakeholders noted that Justice Ministry,
Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) and Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) top priorities--terrorism, the border,
and counterfeits with safety issues like fake
pharmaceuticals--do not currently leave much attention or
funding for copyright protection. Anecdotal evidence of
progress, including RCMP training and minor counterfeit
seizures, was countered by general frustration over CBSA's
lack of power and all three agencies' inaction. Since RCMP
and Customs often do not respond to industry information on
infringement, Embassy has requested greater industry feedback
on industry's own enforcement actions. CMPDA gave an example
of a private seizure of 11,000 counterfeit DVDs from one
store in Toronto's Pacific Mall. (After giving the owner a
list of counterfeit DVDs that the owner agreed to hand over,
CMPDA officials were not surprised to return the next day to
find the store completely restocked...with counterfeit DVDs.)
ESA representatives also indicated that they intend to lobby
for more RCMP resources to combat copyright infringement;
they also hope to find a way for CBSA to have more power to
seize shipments (although ESA and CMPDA mentioned that the
border may become less important as Canadian-made
counterfeiting increases). Obviously enforcement is an
ongoing issue for IPR stakeholders, and we will provide
further information as we receive it. (Comment: one contact
told econoff of a recent discussion with a prominent IPR
lawyer who suggested that industry associations not even try
for criminal sanctions for TPM circumvention in C-60, since
it would not be enforced and therefore would be just one more
toothless law on the books. End comment.)
CAMCORDING IN THEATERS
-----------------------
¶9. CMPDA raised a new issue in meetings last week:
camcording new-release movies in theaters to create
counterfeit DVDs that often hit the streets within hours of
the official movie premiers. Because movies open in Canada
at the same time as in the United States, and because movies
in Canada are shown in both French and English, Canada has
become a primary source for camcorded counterfeits. In fact,
according to CMPDA, of all theaters which are used for
camcording new-release movies, 40 percent are in Canada, with
the majority of that 40 percent coming from just two theaters
in Montreal. CMPDA has worked with the theater owners in
question and is engaged in training their staff to combat
this activity, but without any law against camcording in
theaters, options are limited. RCMP and the local police
can't do anything without proof of commercial intent, and
generally the best CMPDA can hope for is that the offenders
will be ejected from the theater for that particular showing.
CMPDA is developing an estimate of the economic loss from
this sort of piracy, which they hope to use to prompt an
amendment to the criminal code outlawing camcording in
theaters. We have requested a copy of their loss estimates
when compiled, and we will continue to follow this issue
closely.
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
WILKINS