

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE138, 2008 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - COSTA RICA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE138.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE138 | 2009-03-04 15:03 | 2011-03-21 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0138/01 0631538
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 041538Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0545
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000138
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
EEB/TPP/IPE FOR TMCGOWAN AND SKEAT
PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR JGROVES AND GVETERE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON KIPR CS
SUBJECT: 2008 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - COSTA RICA
REF: A) 09 STATE 8410
B) 06 SAN JOSE 0464
C) 07 SAN JOSE 0335
D) 08 SAN JOSE 0155
E) 08 SAN JOSE 0959
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (U) Since last year's report (Ref D), the GOCR enacted a number
of laws related to Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) as required by
the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR), but the
success in passing new IPR legislation highlighted the country's
failure to enforce existing laws. Costa Rica's Attorney General
publicly and repeatedly stated that Costa Rica should use its
limited investigative and prosecutorial resources to pursue violent
and drug-related crimes and instructed staff prosecutors to pursue
IPR cases only if they implied harm to people or the environment.
¶2. (U) Nonetheless, there was IPR progress. The Costa Rican
Industrial Registry issued many more patents than in recent years.
A number of Costa Rican officials received training in IPR
enforcement, administration, prosecution, and customs from USPTO,
DHS, WIPO, and others. The Judicial Branch, through the Judicial
School, has engaged in IPR training and wants to provide more
training opportunities for judges and prosecutors. Due to the
CAFTA-DR-related legislative gains (which required significant
political will by the executive branch), and improvements with
registrations, Post recommends that Costa Rica's ranking not be
lowered, and that the country remain on the Watch List for the 2009
Special 301 Report (Ref A). END SUMMARY.
----------------------------
IPR BACKGROUND IN COSTA RICA
----------------------------
¶3. (U) After a difficult and extended implementation review
process, CAFTA-DR entered into force (EIF) for Costa Rica on January
1, 2009. However, entry into force did not quiet CAFTA and IPR
critics. Issues related to IPR rose to the forefront of public
debate during the campaign leading up to the October 7, 2007
nationwide referendum to ratify the country's participation in
CAFTA-DR. Those opposed routinely spoke out against the Agreement's
requirements to create effective deterrents against IPR infringement
as well as protections for IPR, politicizing the issues. Opposition
leaders asserted that increased penalties for IPR violators would
"send students to jail for copying textbooks" and increased IPR
protection would bankrupt the local social security system since it
would be forced to purchase original, innovative pharmaceuticals
rather than generics. The Costa Rican public ultimately rejected
such arguments and approved CAFTA-DR by a slim margin, but the
negative campaign created an environment where issues related to IPR
remain politically controversial.
--------------------------------------------- --
NOW CAFTA-DR COMPLIANT. . .WITH AN IPR FOOTNOTE
--------------------------------------------- --
¶4. (U) After Costa Rica was included in the Priority Watch List in
2001, the country took the necessary steps to bring into force the
WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Performance and Phonograms
Treaty (WPPT) on March 6, 2002 and May 20, 2002, respectively.
Costa Rica also ratified the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Costa
Rica posted incremental -- but limited -- IPR progress over the past
several years (Refs B and C).
¶5. (SBU) Since last year's Special 301 Report, Costa Rica made all
the necessary legislative reforms to comply with CAFTA-DR
obligations related to IPR. In recognition of meeting CAFTA
standards through legislative reforms, the United States Trade
Representative (USTR) certified Costa Rican CAFTA-DR compliance in
late 2008, paving the way for EIF a few weeks later. However, three
technical corrections remain for legislative action by the Costa
Rican national assembly. Packaged into one final piece of
legislation, the corrections (Ref E) must be passed into law by
January 1, 2010. Failure to do so will result in a holdback of
tariff preferences on a select category of Costa Rican export
products, most likely sugar. The Arias Administration is confident
that the process will be completed in 2009.
-------------------------------------------
. . . BUT SADDLED BY ENFORCEMENT CHALLENGES
-------------------------------------------
¶6. (U) Despite these legislative victories, real challenges remain
in effectively ensuring that the laws have an impact on the local
IPR environment. Throughout 2008, Costa Rica continued to falter in
enforcing its IPR laws, which criminalize counterfeiting and piracy.
The country's public prosecutors have consistently demurred from
prosecuting IPR cases unless they involve potential harm to people
or the environment. The prosecution of IPR crimes is handled by
public prosecutors in the "various crimes" divisions of the branch
offices of the Attorney General's office (in which an individual was
appointed with responsibility for IPR prosecution). Crimes related
to IPR form only a portion of the portfolio of these prosecutors and
receive little attention. Rather, the prosecutors tend to invoke
"opportunity criteria" (akin to prosecutorial discretion) to avoid
opening investigations into reported IPR crimes.
¶7. (U) The Attorney General of Costa Rica, Francisco Dall'Anese,
publicly and privately reiterated that he does not support diverting
limited resources to the prosecution of IPR crimes. Rather, he
maintains that private companies can seek redress in civil courts or
can initiate a criminal public action through private application.
By this process, a private party (almost always through an attorney)
files a complaint and jointly conducts the investigation and
prosecution of the case with the public prosecutor. While this
could be an effective means of prosecuting IPR violators, the
reality is that the private sector and the prosecutor's office have
yet to coordinate in a meaningful way. Likewise, the use of the
civil courts to pursue private cases against IPR violators is
hampered by the extreme length of time it takes to receive a civil
judgment (up to 15 years) and the small monetary damages awarded.
¶8. (SBU) Industry and others have asked Dall'Anese to halt the
nearly automatic use of opportunity criteria with IPR crimes, but he
has rebuffed their calls, and is in a position to do so. The
position of Attorney General in Costa Rica is entirely independent
of the Costa Rican Executive and Legislative Branches.
Constitutionally, the position falls under the Judiciary, but, in
practice, it is almost completely autonomous. Dall'Anese was
reelected to a second four year term as Attorney General in late
¶2007. (COMMENT: Knowledgeable local contacts tell us that
Dall'Anese is unlikely to run for a third term in 2011. END
COMMENT.)
¶9. (U) The few prosecutions that wound their way through the
criminal court system over the last two years were originally
started long before. In February 2008, industry successfully
concluded a prosecution against a counterfeiter of apparel. As has
been the case in previous successful IPR prosecutions, the judge
immediately paroled the convicted counterfeiter as it was her first
offense and the sentence was for less than three years. (COMMENT: No
matter the crime, judges in Costa Rica have the latitude to
immediately parole first-offenders who have been sentenced to less
than three years of prison. Judges generally use this power in all
criminal cases when it can be applied. END COMMENT.)
--------------------------------------
AT THE BORDER: ARE THE GOODS GENUINE?
--------------------------------------
¶10. (U) Officers within the FBI-equivalent Judicial Police (OIJ)
state that most counterfeit goods within Costa Rica are imported
from elsewhere rather than manufactured in the country.
Unfortunately, Costa Rica's Customs service continues to face
difficulties in halting the flow of counterfeit goods into the
country. The leadership of Customs is aware of the importance of
seizing pirated goods, but most customs agents lack the necessary
training to recognize counterfeits. Local industry has also
expressed an interest in providing counterfeit recognition training
to Customs officials.
¶11. (U) In addition, the laws regulating the filing of criminal
cases can impede the seizure of pirated goods at the border. If a
customs agent recognizes that a shipment contains pirated goods, the
agent can order the shipment seized for 48 hours. If, at the end of
that period, the holder of the IPR for the product involved has not
filed a criminal complaint against the importer, the customs agent
must either release the goods or file a criminal complaint. The
latter action can open the agent up to personal liability through a
countersuit by the importer if the criminal complaint is ultimately
unsuccessful.
¶12. (U) Recent changes in the law give the customs agent ten days
from seizure to file the criminal complaint, but the customs agent
continues to be personally liable if the complaint is unsuccessful.
Increased communication between Customs and industry would help
solve this problem by providing time for the owner of the trademark
or patent to file the police report. In such cases, even if the
prosecutor ultimately invokes opportunity criteria and abandons
his/her role in the criminal prosecution, the private party could
continue the action, aided by the fact that the goods have already
been seized by Customs.
--------------------------------------------- ---
COSTA RICAN PATENT OFFICE: CAPACITY BY CONTRACT
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶13. (SBU) In 2008 the Costa Rican Industrial Property (IP) Office
of the National Registry finally began to address severe delays in
processing patent applications. Through 2007, patent attorneys in
Costa Rica related that the office had not yet begun processing
patent cases first submitted in 2004 and 2005. The table below
illustrates progress, although the backlog may take years to erase.
Number of Application Approvals
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008
Patent 13 4 13 53
Utility Model 0 1 1 2
Industrial Model 4 3 2 21
Industrial Design 1 1 - 15
TOTAL 18 9 16 91
Source: Industrial Property Registry
The IP Office informs us that in 2008 the office completed the
review of a total of 140 applications, approving the 91 shown above
and rejecting 49. While new patent applications are immediately
processed, there is still a backlog of about 1,200 patent
applications waiting for technical review.
¶14. (U) The IP Office believes that it is on the verge of hiring
five in-house patent examiners with training and experience in
specific areas of science and technology. It has taken several
years to create these positions. These in-house examiners will not
be hired within the Civil Service structure and therefore may be
paid salaries commensurate with their expertise. To date, the IP
office has relied heavily on contract relationships with the Costa
Rican Technical Institute and the Pharmacists Board Association to
provide experts to serve as outside examiners. The IP Office will
continue to use these and other outside examiners to move through
the backlog of patent applications.
¶15. (U) The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has
worked closely with the Costa Rican IP Office to train employees.
WIPO also offered training to officials in the judiciary that have
an interest in IPR. In addition, the U.S. Embassy sent eight Costa
Rican officials to the USPTO's Global Intellectual Property Academy
for training.
--------------------------------------
USE/PROCUREMENT OF GOVERNMENT SOFTWARE
--------------------------------------
¶16. (U) The 2002 Executive Decree #30, 151-J, mandated that all
government ministries use only legally-licensed computer software.
According to this decree, each ministry was to conduct an internal
audit and submit a statement of compliance no later than July 31,
¶2003. The government subsequently claimed full certification of all
ministries, although there had been no independent confirmation.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶17. (SBU) In general, parts of the Costa Rican government, notably
the judiciary, do not yet view IPR as a tool to spur innovation.
The executive branch recognizes the value of IPR enforcement and
prosecution and the private sector wants judicial action on IPR
cases. After making progress in IPR legislation as instituted by
CAFTA-DR's entry into force, the focus of attention is now on the
judiciary and how it handles cases in a CAFTA-DR compliant IPR
regime.
¶18. (SBU) Therefore, based on the GOCR's progress to date in
improving the country's IPR framework -- legislative reforms,
political will in the executive branch, sharp increase in patent
application approvals, and receptivity to training opportunities --
Post recommends that Costa Rica remain on the Watch List. This is
the properly-modulated message, in our view. To lower Costa Rica's
standing immediately after the GOCR finally completed its CAFTA-DR
implementation obligations would be too harsh a signal. Such a move
would likely be viewed as provocative by the Arias administration,
which worked very hard to pass the necessary IPR legislation for
CAFTA-DR EIF. This would also be counterproductive to our low-key
but steady efforts to work with the GOCR and the private sector (and
around the Attorney General, if necessary) to improve IPR
protection.
CIANCHETTE