

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06WELLINGTON483, SOME QUESTION NZ'S DEFENSE STRATEGIES IN LIGHT OF RECENT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06WELLINGTON483.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06WELLINGTON483 | 2006-06-26 00:12 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO9887
RR RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0483/01 1770036
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 260036Z JUN 06
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2942
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 0809
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHJJAA/JICPAC HONOLULU HI
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000483
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR D (FRITZ), EAP/FO, AND EAP/ANP
NSC FOR VICTOR CHA
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISD LIZ PHU
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV NZ
SUBJECT: SOME QUESTION NZ'S DEFENSE STRATEGIES IN LIGHT OF RECENT
SPENDING INCREASES
REF: WELLINGTON 449
Summary
-------
¶1. (SBU) Embassy contacts have generally welcomed the defense
spending increases in this year's budget. Some question, however,
the general direction of New Zealand defense policy, and others
remain concerned about what they say are continued problems with NZ
Defense Force (NZDF) recruitment and retention. Although increased
defense spending does not feature high on the political concerns of
voters in New Zealand, this could change were social spending
reduced as a consequence. End summary.
Details of the increased funding
--------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) As noted reftel, the NZDF received an extra capital
injection of - NZD 72 million (approximately USD 4.5 million) on top
off baseline finding in the 2006/7 budget, as part of the Defense
Sustainability Initiative (DSI). (FYI: DSI is a 10-year initiative
announced last year designed to enhance recruitment and retention,
including by increasing salaries and upgrading facilities. At the
time the budget was announced, Defense Minister Phil Goff declared
that this new expenditure ensured that the Government will achieve
its goal of contributing in a meaningful way to international
affairs and rebuilding a "modern, professional, and well-equipped
Defence Force." The budget also includes an NZD 305 million
(approximately US 188 million) allocation to various capital
projects for the 2006/07 financial year, under the Long Term
Development Plan the Government launched in 2002.
News of capital injection of spending is well received
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶3. (SBU) The injection of capital from this year's Budget and the
financial certainty that the DSI guarantees is widely welcomed by
some analysts of New Zealand defense matters. Peter Cozens of the
Centre of Strategic Studies at Victoria University in Wellington
believes that with DSI, funding, plans and political commitments are
now in place to allow the NZDF to meet its future policy objectives.
Dr. Lance Beath, a former New Zealand defense official and diplomat
now at Victoria University's School of Government, agrees.
¶4. (SBU) The Director of the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre at
the Australian National University, Dr. Robert Ayson, a New
Zealander who was formerly an advisor on New Zealand's Parliamentary
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Select Committee, believes that
the capital injection will enable the defense establishment to meet
the expectations of the current Labour Government.
The political argument is less about spending, more about general
direction
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶5. (SBU) The National, NZ First and ACT Parties have complained
about what they say is a lack of coherence in the Government's
strategic decision-making. In particular, they have questioned
NZDF's asset acquisition in past years (such as Light Armored
Vehicles instead of tanks) and the dearth of Government White Papers
published since Labour took office in 1999.
¶6. (SBU) Paul Buchanan, an Auckland University security analyst who
often provides New Zealand media with blunt assessments of security
policy, believes that increasing expenditure is too simplistic a
cure for perceived defense ills in New Zealand. He believes that
New Zealand needs to align its strategic outlook with its resource
base, taking into account the country's location, and relevant
security threats. He argues that so long as the political argument
is about money alone and comparisons are made to larger states, New
Zealand will continue to drift with regards to its strategic
position.
No, it's about spending
-----------------------
¶7. (SBU) It is true that some analysts say New Zealand's per capita
military spending is insufficient compared to that in Australia.
Most compare the United States, United Kingdom, France or Germany.
The inference is that New Zealand is not pulling its weight on
matters of international security and instead is freeloading off the
WELLINGTON 00000483 002 OF 003
Australians and others. Beath notes that New Zealand is
historically parsimonious when it comes to defense spending,
especially when compared to Australia.
¶8. (SBU) However, Dr. Jim Rolfe, a former policy advisor in the
department of Prime Minister and Cabinet and now an Associate
Professor at the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies based in
Hawaii, believes that comparing New Zealand and Australian defense
budgets is not valid because of differing strategic perceptions and
needs. Buchanan agrees, saying it is "absurd to compare a small
country like New Zealand with the behemoths like the US and the UK,
or even Australia." Instead, he contends it's more logical to
compare New Zealand with other small democracies, such as Portugal,
Uruguay, Norway and Costa Rica who "each share a similar strategic
problem if not situation with New Zealand." Buchanan claims that
because these small democracies and New Zealand spend similar
amounts on defense, New Zealand is in the mainstream of defense
spending and foreign military commitment by small democracies.
Defense spending typically loses out to social spending
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶9. (SBU) New Zealand is also no different from other small
democracies when it comes to other spending priorities.
Historically, New Zealand budgets have allocated the majority of
funds to domestic social programs, particularly health, education
and welfare. Moreover, since the Vietnam War New Zealand
governments have -- in the absence of imminent threat -- been
reluctant to engage in sustained external military operations
without majority support. The Government's unwillingness to commit
combat troops to Iraq is testimony to this.
Defense spending not an issue that resonates with voters
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶10. (SBU) According to Beath "the average New Zealander is not
sophisticated enough to grasp the nuances of defense spending."
However, many more New Zealanders are critically aware of the new
post 9/11 security environment and the need to secure New Zealand's
immediate region and border from threats and to protect the region
from instability. Therefore, the recent increases in defense and
related regional and border security spending do not seem to have
resulted in any noticeable public outcry. But it is also unlikely
that renewed calls from National for greater military spending will
echo with New Zealand voters. Most New Zealanders still accept that
the physical defense of New Zealand's borders is dependant on the
country's larger military friends. Nor would they want to see
military spending eat into social welfare spending, a deeply-rooted
and widely accepted tradition in New Zealand.
Human capital most critical issue
---------------------------------
¶11. (SBU) Government and critics alike acknowledge that the most
critical issues facing New Zealand defense establishment is low
personnel retention and recruitment rates. In a buoyant labor
market, many highly skilled defense staff - civilian and military -
are being lured to other organizations by more attractive salary
packages. Cozens believes the loss of human capital is the greatest
challenge facing NZDF and greatly limits the country's operational
military capacity. Although he applauds the focus on building up
human capital in the DSI, Cozens notes that at present there is
barely a sufficient number of personnel to attend to the operational
obligations of the New Zealand Defence Force, a view endorsed by
Beath.
¶12. (SBU) The issue of personnel retention and recruitment is part
of the political debate. Ron Mark, defence spokesman for NZ First,
has campaigned on the need to apportion funding to increase defense
salaries across the board. This, he argues, is the key to
strengthening personnel retention and recruitment rates in the armed
services.
¶13. (SBU) In a recent appearance in front of Parliament's foreign
affairs, defence and trade committee, Goff announced that the shroud
of secrecy that has traditionally cloaked the SAS will be lifted,
albeit slightly, to offer more transparency. This pleased Mark,
himself a former member of the SAS, who though acknowledging the
need for secrecy on operational matters stated that the "the high
and sometimes unnecessary level of secrecy was hindering public
scrutiny of the [SAS] force." This, he argued, hindered the ability
to recruit and retain SAS troops given the competitive market for
their skills. Mark said that at present the members of Police
WELLINGTON 00000483 003 OF 003
Special Tactics Group are paid more than the SAS but are doing less
operationally.
¶14. (SBU) During the Committee hearing Goff also acknowledged NZDF
recruitment is difficult but has said that a "not ungenerous" pay
package introduced in 2005 went some way to address this issue. He
stated that the current defense salary range is from NZD 80,000 to
140,000 (USD49,000 to 86,000) including benefits. Yet despite this,
Goff concluded, the armed services would continue to struggle to
compete with lucrative private security contracts in Iraq, for
example, which can pay up to NZD 300,000 tax-free.
McCormick