

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA590, 2005 SPECIAL 301 REPORT FROM OTTAWA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA590.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA590 | 2005-02-25 15:03 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
251551Z Feb 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000590
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DEPT FOR EB/TPP/IPE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR CA CBSA RCMP
SUBJECT: 2005 SPECIAL 301 REPORT FROM OTTAWA
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The regulatory picture on IPR has not
changed much from earlier years, however Canada is moving to
address many of the issues raised in the Special 301
submissions, even though results are unlikely to be visible
before the end of April. On the headline issues of
enforcement and WIPO ratification, there is incremental
progress. Canada continues to inch toward WIPO
ratification, with legislation due this spring. Departments
responsible for IPR issues are also working to develop more
effective cooperation on enforcement, but are not seeking
greater enforcement powers at the border at this point. End
Summary.
¶2. Econoffs met with representatives of FAC, Industry
Canada, International Trade, Health Canada (HC), the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), the Patent Medicine Prices
Review Board (PMPRB), and the Canadian Border Services
Agency (CBSA) to get their perspective on public submissions
under Special 301 and the state of Canadian IPR law in
general. Under the caveat that GOC finds the Special 301
process "deeply flawed", GOC officials responded to the
points in the public submissions and gave an update on the
status of intellectual property protection in Canada.
-----------------------------------------
PhRMA Comments on Patents: GOC Response
-----------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) Data exclusivity: In December, Industry Canada
published its proposed regulation to allow for longer data
protection for patented medicines. At the same time, Health
Canada has published complementary regulations that would
circumscribe industry's ability to patent incremental
innovations in existing drugs in a practice commonly known
as "evergreening". Public comments on these regulations are
due February 24th. Under the proposed rules, any Health
Canada reliance on proprietary data in judging a generic
application engages the protection period. HC is also
proposing eight years of data exclusivity (three more years
than the current five) and an extra six years for pediatric
information. (Comment: Canadian patent-based industry
reps have told us that in general their industry is happy
with the extended data exclusivity and resigned to tighter
controls on 'incremental innovation.' End Comment).
¶4. (SBU) International Trade Canada (ITCan) and Health
Canada representatives disputed PhRMA's argument that brand-
name manufacturers are legally vulnerable even when they
comply with Canadian Notice of Compliance rules, saying
that, while lawsuits are underway, no decisions have been
reached and therefore it is too early to claim injury to the
industry. They also commented that the pharmaceutical
industry's claims of damages do not take into account the
public costs of using NOC to delay legitimate generic drugs.
¶5. (SBU) Approval times: Health Canada officials
described their efforts to streamline the approval process,
noting their appreciation for FDA's advice and assistance.
In the past year, Health Canada has hired new staff and
adopted some of FDA's practices, such as assignment of a
'point person' to guide each submission through the process,
and a move toward team reviews of submissions. Over 70%
of the existing backlog has been eliminated, and Health
Canada is aiming for on-time review in the near future.
¶6. (SBU) Price controls: Industry Canada reiterated that
Canadian drug prices are in line with OECD prices and that
price differentials also reflect the U.S. and Canadian GDP
per capita differential of roughly 40 percent. (Comment: the
first point is true by definition, since PMPRB generally
sets prices at about the OECD median. The second point,
which we have heard before, is dubious. Canada's per capita
GDP is only about 20% below the U.S. figure; moreover, as
drug costs are assumed by provincial health plans, it is
hard to see why consumer disposable income is a factor. End
comment.)
¶7. (SBU) Patent term restoration: Industry Canada and
Health Canada officials acknowledged that this is a long-
term concern for PhRMA, and noted that PhRMA has had the ear
of several senior government officials on the issue. Canada
is not obligated under WIPO to offer patent term restoration
and has no current plans to do so. Nevertheless, Industry
and Health Canada officials understand that the lack of
patent term restoration affects the investment climate for
pharmaceutical companies. They are optimistic that the
issue will become less pressing as the drug approval process
in Canada becomes faster.
¶8. (SBU) Patent protection for higher lifeforms: Canadian
courts have prohibited the patenting of higher lifeforms.
The GOC has no plans to amend the Patent Act to overrule
that decision. However, Industry Canada experts argue that,
as several Supreme Court Justices pointed out, patenting of
genes offers adequate if indirect protection to
bioengineered life forms. Industry Canada experts noted
that the biotech industry did not mention this issue in a
recent meeting with Industry Minister Emerson.
¶9. (SBU) Access to medicines: GOC officials were puzzled by
the PhRMA comments that "implementation must be in line with
both parts of the WTO decision", as they believe this point
is explicitly covered in both Canadian legislation and draft
regulations.
-------------
Enforcement
-------------
¶10. (SBU) IT Canada and other GOC officials argue that the
enforcement picture in Canada has measurably improved
because of more effective coordination within the existing
legal structure. The GOC has formed an interdepartmental
working group consisting of ITCan, Industry Canada, Canadian
Heritage, the RCMP, CBSA, Justice, and Public Safety and
Emergency Preparedness Canada to coordinate enforcement of
IPR laws. This working group has also met with industry
associations, and GOC representatives are looking forward to
meeting with U.S. officials on STOP.
¶11. (SBU) Since December of 2003, RCMP and CBSA are under
the same minister, a development which has led to greater
cooperation between the agencies. Both CBSA and RCMP
representatives listed increased training and cooperation as
major improvements in IPR enforcement in Canada. A recent 5-
day workshop in Ontario drew over 100 participants, the
largest workshop of its kind in North America. Upcoming
training includes five two-day workshops in 2005 in other
Canadian provinces. The RCMP officials also cited two
continuing joint force operations, Castille in Montreal and
Ocat in Toronto, which have already resulted in the seizure
of large shipments of counterfeit goods. CBSA
representatives highlighted their organization's efforts to
streamline the procedure when they encounter counterfeit
goods, including a standard process for contacting
appropriate officials and determining whether it is GOC's
priority to intercept a particular shipment.
¶12. (SBU) The CBSA representative explained that CBSA
operates on a "risk management" basis using a list of
government priorities, including IPR. Standard procedure
now requires CBSA to detain suspect counterfeit goods until
RCMP or other enforcement agencies are notified and can act.
The CBSA representative also clarified that they can now
look for shipments based on information received from other
law enforcement agencies. Although there is no customs
infraction as such if counterfeit goods are properly
declared, the RCMP representative noted that they almost
always break other laws. He cited as evidence of an
improved enforcement climate the fact that goods no longer
arrive at the Canadian border with declarations that
explicitly identify them as counterfeit.
¶13. (SBU) Justice has also increased IPR training and has
created a network for prosecutors to share case law and
training information. In a positive development, 2004 saw
higher criminal penalties in IPR cases. Two examples were a
C$150,000 fine for a company guilty of selling electrical
goods with fake UL labels and a case where two men were each
fined C$25,000 and sentenced to 60 days in jail for selling
illegal satellite equipment.
------------------
Copyright Reform
------------------
¶14. (SBU) There are no solid developments in Canadian
copyright reform since the US-Canada experts' meeting in
December 2004. Legislation covering WIPO ratification,
access for higher education, ISP liability, and protection
of photos among other issues is currently in the drafting
process. Canadian Heritage expects a bill to be introduced
in Parliament "in the first half of this year", but most
likely not before May, and that the law will probably not
pass this year. In the meantime, the government's reply to
the 2004 Heritage Committee report on copyright reform is
due in April. This report will most likely reflect the
substance of what the government plans to table.
¶15. (SBU) On the controversial 2004 filesharing decision,
ITCan said that many observers considered that section 80
sub 2 of existing law seems to address the situation, and
the Finckenstein decision came as a surprise to many
officials. The December private copying tariff decision
(which excluded embedded memory and harddrive copying from
the private copying levy) is expected to be appealed to the
supreme court. If upheld, GOC experts believe it would
eliminate the legal basis for the filesharing decision, in
which Judge Finckenstein relied upon the existence of the
private copy levy as evidence that such copying was not an
infringement. Econ officers reiterated that the best and
simplest solution to the problem remains rapid ratification
of the WIPO treaties.
------------
Conclusion
------------
¶16. (SBU) At this point, the regulatory picture on IPR has
not changed much from recent years. However, Canada is
moving to address many of the issues raised in the Special
301 submissions, even though results are unlikely to be
visible before the end of April. While WIPO ratification
remains a good way off, Canadian IPR officials are no longer
claiming to us that existing Canadian law offers adequate
protection; pressure from the Heritage Committee and the
consternation generated by the filesharing decision make it
likely that legislation will at last come before Parliament
this spring as promised. While its fate under a minority
government is hard to predict, there is strong support among
both Liberals and Conservatives for WIPO ratification; other
issues contained in the bill are likely to prove more
controversial. On enforcement, it is hard to tell yet
whether better enforcement training and coordination will
lead to more seizures at the border; Post would like to hear
from US firms about their experiences so that we can
continue to engage the interdepartmental committee on the
issue. Action request: GOC has requested advance notice of
USTR's decision if possible; post would appreciate a heads
up.
CELLUCCI