

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05SANJOSE1828, PRESIDENT'S PARTY PUBLICLY SUPPORTS CAFTA-DR, BUT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SANJOSE1828.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 SAN JOSE 001828
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
WHA/CEN
EB FOR WCRAFT, BLAMPRON
E FOR DEDWARDS
WHA/EPSC FOR KURS, LGUMBINER
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR RVARGO, CPADILLA, AMALITO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECPS ECON PREL PGOV SOCI CS
SUBJECT: PRESIDENT'S PARTY PUBLICLY SUPPORTS CAFTA-DR, BUT
OUTLOOK FOR NECESSARY IMPLEMENTATION LEGISLATION UNCLEAR
REF: (A) SAN JOSE 01774
(B) SAN JOSE 01639
¶1. (U) Summary. Members of President Pacheco's Social
Christian Unity Party (PUSC) are publicly urging him to
send the United States-Central American-Dominican Republic
Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) to the Legislative Assembly
as soon as possible, despite the continued failure to pass
the Fiscal Reform bill (Note: President Pacheco has made
passage of fiscal reform a condition for his sending CAFTA-
DR to the Assembly for ratification [Ref A]). PUSC
representatives also requested that the Administration send
the necessary CAFTA-DR-related legislation; including bills
to allow competition in the telecommunications and
insurance markets. Currently, these industries are run by
the state-owned monopolies, the Costa Rican Institute of
Electricity (ICE) and the National Institute of Insurance
(INS), respectively. The gradual opening of these markets
to competition is required to implement the trade
agreement. Other legislation, although not required to
implement CAFTA-DR, is necessary to increase the global
competitiveness of Costa Rican companies. End Summary
¶2. (U) After meeting on August 8, 2005, the PUSC Assembly
members (deputies) officially gave a "public vote of
support" to CAFTA-DR. They also urged the President to
send the trade agreement and information about the
complementary agenda to the Assembly. "We have always been
respectful of the Administration and its decisions, but we
believe that it is necessary to be able to move forward on
this issue in Congress," said Lillian Salas, PUSC deputy
and party leader, after the meeting with her fellow
deputies. The PUSC deputies also want to discuss the
legislative projects related to implementation of CAFTA-DR,
such as those opening the telecommunications and insurance
markets to competition.
--------------------------------------------- -----------
Legislation Required to Implement CAFTA-DR in Costa Rica-
THE PARALLEL or IMPLEMENTATION AGENDA
--------------------------------------------- -----------
¶3. (U) The proposed legislation that will open the
telecommunications and insurance markets to competition as
required by CAFTA-DR has not yet been sent to the Assembly.
The Administration has referred to these projects as the
"parallel agenda" or the "implementation agenda" to CAFTA-
DR - that legislation that must be completed to comply with
the requirements of CAFTA-DR. Based on various sources,
including personnel within the GOCR, the telecommunications
legislation, known as the "Telecommunications Act," is
being managed by the Ministries of Foreign Trade (COMEX)
and Finance with input from the various interested parties
such as ICE. Reportedly, neither legislative project has
been finalized by the Administration. Gilberto Barrantes,
the Economy Minister and new Coordinator of the President's
Economic Council, stated that he expects a first draft of
the Telecommunications Act this week. However, he called
attention to the importance of moving forward on the
proposed Law to Strengthen and Modernize ICE (see paragraph
7).
¶4. (U) One month ago, Finance Vice Minister David Fuentes
told Econoff that the insurance and telecommunications
legislation would be sent to the Assembly by the end of
August 2005. However, lack of progress on the
Telecommunications Act has caused a delay. Finance
Minister Federico Carrillo stated that he expects the
telecommunications legislation to be presented in November
and maintains that the insurance legislation will be ready
in August. COMMENT: It is clear that the
telecommunications legislation is more complex and
politically sensitive than the insurance legislation.
However, the need to proceed in the telecommunications
arena is, arguably, more urgent because, under CAFTA-DR,
the opening of the telecommunications market starts on
January 1, 2006, while January 1, 2008 marks the opening of
the insurance market. END COMMENT.
--------------------------------------------- --
Legislation to Improve Global Competitiveness -
THE COMPLEMENTARY AGENDA
--------------------------------------------- --
¶5. (U) Other legislation that is not required to implement
CAFTA-DR, but is necessary to ensure Costa Rica can take
advantage of the opportunities created by the agreement, is
referred to as the "complementary agenda" (Ref B). To
date, we have been told by the GOCR that the complementary
agenda will focus on upgrading infrastructure (mostly rural
roads and highways) and increasing the competitiveness of
small- and medium-size enterprises. Costa Rica has
arranged for approximately USD 209 million of funding for
these initiatives with the majority of the resources being
provided by a USD 117 million loan from the Inter-American
Development Bank (IDB).
¶6. (U) Other smaller loans will be provided by the World
Bank and the Central American Bank of Economic Integration
(BCIE) to fund education projects and improve customs
systems, respectively (Ref B). COMMENT: Legislative
Assembly approval of these loans is necessary prior to
disbursal of funds. To date, no legislation has been
provided to the Assembly on any of these loans. However,
based on information provided to Econoff, the necessary
legislation should be sent to the Assembly within the next
two months. END COMMENT.
--------------------------------------------- --------
THE STATUS OF THE LAW TO STRENGTHEN AND MODERNIZE ICE
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶7. (U) At the time that Costa Rican negotiators signed
CAFTA-DR in May 2004, it was assumed and reflected in the
text of the agreement that Costa Rica would pass a Law to
Strengthen and Modernize ICE by December 31, 2004. The
Costa Rican negotiators inserted this requirement into the
agreement to enact a law to give ICE sufficient autonomy
and resources to be able to compete against potential
competitors in an open telecommunications market. The
proposed law was introduced in the Assembly prior to the
signing of CAFTA-DR and was referred for review to the
Assembly's Special Mixed Commission for ICE, consisting of
deputies from various parties as well as consultants from
inside and outside the GOCR. This Commission is currently
studying the bill and deciding whether it should be
referred to the Assembly floor for a vote.
¶8. (U) The bill has been stuck in the Commission because
of difficulties surrounding the issues of: (1) distribution
of spectrum frequencies; (2) the amount of taxes, if any,
that ICE will pay to the GOCR; and (3) how the rights to
concessions for use of natural resources will be handled.
There are some members of this commission, such as Gloria
Valerin, a PUSC deputy and President of the Special Mixed
Commission, who would like the bill passed in its current
form, which would give ICE unprecedented autonomy and
special treatment such as rights to most, if not all, of
the spectrum of mobile telecommunications frequencies and
exemption from paying taxes. There are other members of
the Commission, such as Libertarian Movement deputy
Federico Malavassi, who are reluctant to give ICE such
special treatment, which they believe would reduce the
likelihood of any real competition in telecommunications.
COMMENT: Eladio Gonzalez, Adviser to the Commission and a
legal expert who wrote the legislation, told Econoff that
if the Telecommunications Act is completed correctly, i.e.,
a clear regulatory framework is constructed and a strong
and unbiased regulator is established, the passage of the
ICE Modernization bill would not conflict with the
requirements of CAFTA-DR. END COMMENT.
¶9. (U) Valerin, stated, "We will not give an inch. If
they want the complementary agenda, they should approve the
strengthening (of ICE). We are not going to permit the
weakening of ICE in this project." COMMENT: Post believes
that the proposed law in its current form and depending on
the final Telecommunications Law that will be passed, may
result in the inability of Costa Rica to comply with the
equal treatment provisions required by CAFTA-DR. The parts
of the bill that may cause these problems coincide with
those issues already identified in the Mixed Commission's
review. END COMMENT
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶10. (SBU) One key aspect of the legislative projects
associated with the parallel or implementation agenda
should be the creation of a new entity or strengthening of
an existing organization that is independent and capable of
competently regulating the telecommunications and insurance
industries. This is important to ensure that all potential
competitors are treated equally and have the same
opportunities to access the markets, as required by the
spirit and letter of CAFTA-DR. This is no small task since
the GOCR has very little experience in regulating
competitive markets, and the most likely regulator, the
Regulatory Authority of Public Services (ARESEP), is not
considered effective in regulating much simpler sectors.
In addition, ARESEP has its hands full with regulating
everything from taxi fares to gasoline prices.
¶11. (SBU) The pressure to send CAFTA-DR and all related
legislation required for its implementation is mounting,
and it is now clear that if CAFTA-DR were sent to the
Assembly today, there would be enough votes to pass it.
However, many knowledgeable people doubt whether the
Assembly has the ability to create the necessary
legislation to fulfill commitments made in the agreement
(especially in the telecommunications sector) or the
commitment to try to do so in a timely manner.
KAPLAN