

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 03OTTAWA679, MEDIA REACTION: IRAQ; NORTH KOREA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03OTTAWA679.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
03OTTAWA679 | 2003-03-11 20:08 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 OTTAWA 000679
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/CAN, WHA/PDA
WHITE HOUSE PASS NSC/WEUROPE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KPAO KMDR OIIP OPRC CA
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: IRAQ; NORTH KOREA
IRAQ
¶1. "Liberating Iraqis is main justification for war"
Columnist Rosie DiManno writing from Jordan made the
following observations in the liberal Toronto Star
(3/10): "The most urgent and compelling reason
for invading Iraq is the one never mentioned by
bickering diplomats at the United Nations: 24 million
Iraqis, 24 years of barbarous misrule, government by
thuggery.... But world leaders are pragmatic and
utterly selfish, with a keen eye to geopolitical
interests, even as they invest themselves with noble
motives - all this duplicitous keening about avoiding a
catastrophic war. That might be what drove millions of
people around the world to protest against war in Iraq,
but it has precious little to do with the bellicose
objections in Washington, Paris, Beijing, and let's
throw in Berlin, which at least can honestly attest to
the disastrous consequences of military belligerence.
The Germans have been chastened into an appreciation
for peace and diplomacy.... There are a multitude of
reasons for attacking Iraq. It's
to the United States' discredit that U.S. President
George W. Bush has done such a poor job of itemizing
them. He botched the rightness of war by only latterly
addressing the liberation of Iraqis, which should have
been first on the list, and which British Prime
Minister Tony Blair has managed to put at the centre of
his war threat. Washington has cast about for
validations of war: first it was about protecting
American security from Saddam's nasty weapons cache;
then it was about the security of Israel, then the
security of the region, then Saddam's alleged links to
Al Qaeda, and finally a stunning democratization of the
Mideast, starting in Baghdad. No wonder the public's
confused, credulous.... I don't understand why
liberating Iraqis - Sunnis, Shiites, Kurds, Christians,
Turkomans - from despotic tyranny has such little moral
traction. I don't understand why the basic human values
so precious to Canadians are deemed a luxury too taxing
for the international community to deliver to Iraq. I
don't understand the U.N.'s continuing tolerance of
rogue regimes, so long as they don't export tyranny
beyond their borders. I don't understand why the Iraqi
people matter so little."
¶2. "War against Iraq senseless"
Columnist Tom Brodbeck stated in the conservative
tabloid Winnipeg Sun (3/10): "It's one thing for the
United States and their so-called coalition of the
willing to argue that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein is
a menace to the world who ought to be extinguished.
It's quite another for them to bomb Baghdad without the
approval of the United Nations and argue they're doing
so to enforce a series of broken UN resolutions. That's
hypocrisy in its purest form. If the U.S. and others
feel they have enough justification to declare war
against Iraq, whatever that justification may be,
nobody can really stop them. But I wish they wouldn't
insult my intelligence by telling me they're doing so
to enforce a series of UN resolutions.... The UN passes
resolutions all the time. But they have rules on how
those resolutions should be enforced. They have a
Security Council with voting members who have the sole
authority to enforce those resolutions. Anyone else,
including a `coalition of the willing,' who tries to
enforce them is not enforcing UN resolutions, they are
acting outside the UN. You can't have it both ways. You
can't say you're enforcing UN resolutions and then spit
in the eye of the institution that created them. It's
one of the many deficiencies in the pro-war argument.
Another major flaw is the argument that Iraq is
`linked' to terrorist cells, whatever that means....
But when asked for evidence that Iraq was behind 9/11,
the White House always fails to deliver.... It's
perhaps that assertion that erodes Bush's credibility
more than any other. When you don't have a strong case
for action, you reach. And George W. is reaching....
The bottom line today, though, is that nothing is going
to happen overnight in Iraq, except for a possible U.S.-
led war.... The United Nations is combing though Iraq
looking for and actively destroying arms. UN chief
inspector Hans Blix is reporting continued progress and
co-operation. The eye of the world is on Iraq and they
can't attack anyone or really do anything. They're
incarcerated.
Under these circumstances, I don't know how any logical
thinking person could in good conscience approve of
military action against Iraq, killing tens of thousands
of innocent people, creating an explosively dangerous
environment in the Persian Gulf and substantially
increasing the threat of terrorism in the United
States. It simply makes no sense."
¶3. "Arrogant Bush sets stage for final U.N. showdown"
Editorial page editor Haroon Siddiqui suggested in the
liberal Toronto Star (3/9) that, "George W. Bush has
brought the world to the brink of one war and plunged
it into another: the war that he is hell-bent on
unleashing on Iraq, and the other on the diplomatic
front, where he has torpedoed the Atlantic alliance,
undermined moderate Muslim allies and is about to sink
the system of international law that has helped govern
the world since World War II. For this, we can blame
Saddam Hussein, of course, but also America - more
precisely, the Bush administration. Its unmatched
arrogance, staggering dishonesty and extraordinary
incompetence at international relations have
set the stage for the coming week's showdown, not
between enemies but friends.... Since last week, the
Bush mission has also been about establishing democracy
in Iraq and liberating Iraqis from Saddam's tyranny -
the strongest moral point in the American arsenal but
totally ineffective in light of its own past patronage
of the tyrant, its callous discounting of Iraqi
suffering under economic sanctions and the fact that
its bombs will kill many Iraqis before freeing them.
American disdain for international law
is also on display in the stepped-up bombing of Iraqi
defences in and around the north and south no-fly
zones.... So, the war has begun before it has begun....
Meanwhile, the simplest and the most profound questions
remain unanswered: Why war now, especially when it
lacks international legitimacy,
both in law and in the court of world public opinion?
Why abandon the inspections precisely when they are
beginning to work? Why risk the entire U.N. system? Why
risk geopolitical upheaval? More importantly, why risk
inflicting a humanitarian catastrophe on an already
crushed people?"
¶4. "There must be a better 'bastard'"
Former publisher Hartley Steward commented in the
conservative tabloid Ottawa Sun (3/9): "Of all the
bastards in the world available to hate these days,
surely Americans are the least intelligent choice....
In fact, President Bush and his administration, in
light of the Twin Towers attack, have shown surprising
restraint. They have tried patiently to explain their
intent to a world often reluctant to listen. They have
painstakingly made their case. It is downright absurd
to direct hatred toward the U.S. as if the world's only
superpower could not be a victim. Absurd and
transparently opportunistic. The new rules of war, the
suicide bomber's and the terrorist's rationale that no
one is innocent in war, make it entirely possible. It
is so obvious, one is almost embarrassed to point it
out: the real object of hatred here is Osama bin Laden
and his Islamic extremists. We should save our curses
for the madmen who flew airliners into the Trade Center
towers, killing innocents who were doing nothing more
than putting in a day's work. We should direct our
animosity toward rogue states like Iraq who refuse to
comply with UN disarmament orders; who thumb their
noses at the free world. We should husband our hatred
for the psychotic and brutal dictators who rule by fear
and murder and employ poison gas against their own
people. We should save our name-calling for those who
seek and build weapons of mass destruction to let loose
on the world. It is Saddam Hussein who is the bastard
here."
¶5. "France is a true friend"
Foreign affairs columnist Eric Margolis observed in the
conservative tabloid Ottawa Sun (3/9): "...It seems at
times that President Bush is even more
eager to bomb Paris than Baghdad. In fact, the
administration has been treating France like an enemy,
rather than America's oldest ally and intimate friend.
Neo-conservatives even accuse France of anti-Semitism,
a disgusting slander. Far from being an enemy, France
has been doing what a true good friend should do:
telling Washington its policy is wrong and dangerous,
unlike the handkissing leaders of Britain, Spain and
Italy, who crave Bush's political support, or the East
European coalition of the shilling, ex-communist
politicians pandering to Washington for cash....
Bush's crusade against Iraq will go on with or without
Turkey. The war will be akin to throwing a grenade into
a huge hornet's nest. France, which lives next to the
Arab world and has 5 million Muslim citizens, warns an
invasion and occupation of Iraq will roil the entire
region, spark more terrorism, and hit Europe with a
dangerous backblast. But Bush couldn't care less, as he
would say. While Bush prepares war against demolished
Iraq, he is ducking the surging nuclear confrontation
with North Korea, which, unlike Iraq, truly threatens
North America.... America's friends and neighbours, led
by France, the mother of diplomacy, rightly warn the
steroidal Bush
administration to halt its rush to war. President
Chirac and Foreign Minister de Villepin deserve the
Nobel Peace Prize. Americans owe France an apology, and
a hearty 'merci mon ami'"
¶6. "The damage done without a shot being fired"
Columnist Jeffrey Simpson remarked in the leading Globe
and Mail (3/8): "...Those who believe that inspections
are working and can produce additional positive results
must concede the point: Inspections would fail without
a credible threat of force. Or they would make such
little progress as to mock the latest UN resolution's
demand for 'immediate, active and
unconditional' disarmament. You can't have one without
the other, and it is naive to believe otherwise. Saddam
Hussein's regime will never disarm, in whole or in
part, without the threat of being toppled in a war....
The French and most of the world opposed military
action because they feared its consequences; the
Americans and their few allies supported such action
because they feared the consequences of no action.
Without a shot being fired, enormous damage has already
been done to the transatlantic arrangements that stood
these countries in such good stead for so many decades.
To the Americans, it will seem axiomatic now that their
great German friends and their perfidious French ones
will play the anti-American card, so that neither they
nor the disorganized European Union should be factored
into future U.S. foreign policy decisions. Nor should
the
increasingly irrelevant NATO.... The more the United
States feels itself abandoned, misunderstood and
opposed by countries it had counted on as friends, the
less it will reflect on what it has done to bring about
this state of affairs than on the weakness,
unreliability and fecklessness of those erstwhile
friends whose support is not worth all the bother."
¶7. "A deadline fit for the Security Council"
The leading Globe and Mail editorialized (3/8):
"...[I]sn't an ultimatum precisely what's necessary?
Isn't the credible prospect of war precisely what is
needed now to avoid it, by forcing an Iraqi change of
heart?... Ultimately...the issue isn't a precise date.
It is the need to bring this to a head. Mr. Hussein's
game of cat-and-mouse cannot be allowed to continue.
And the U.S. and British troops cannot remain
indefinitely in a state of battle readiness. The
members of the UN Security Council came together last
November and unanimously passed Resolution 1441. They
should come together again early next week and pass the
resolution giving Mr. Hussein a final deadline of March
¶17. War may still be the outcome. But, if so, Mr.
Hussein will have been given every chance to avoid it."
¶8. "The hawks of Iraq"
The conservative National Post opined (3/8): "...We
concede there are real arguments for opposing war -
though we do not find them convincing. Peaceniks,
however, should resist the urge to use Saddam's victims
as props. It is ordinary Iraqis who have the most to
gain from a U.S.-led invasion, and the most to lose
should war opponents get their way."
¶9. "Enough of the weasel words."
The conservative tabloid Ottawa Sun declared (3/8):
"...[L]et's give Saddam one last, last chance - an 18th
resolution giving him until March 17 to disarm - only
11 days sooner than the March 28 deadline in the
'Canadian compromise.' But then the UN must show
whether it is relevant. If Saddam chooses not to
comply, then we believe that even if the war resolution
fails to gather the necessary nine of 15 Security
Council votes, or if France, China or Russia vetoes it,
then the U.S. and Great Britain should lead a coalition
of willing nations to disarm Saddam.
He is a tyrant.
He terrorizes his own people.
He has attacked three neighbours.
He has pursued weapons of mass destruction.
He supports terrorists and terrorism.
Should he supply chemical or biological weapons to
terrorists, the world will see a horror that would
dwarf 9/11. Back down now and the UN will send
a message to tyrants and terrorists everywhere that it
is open season on the rest of us. Time to decide."
NORTH KOREA
¶10. "They could be on their own"
Editor emeritus Peter Worthington wrote in the
conservative tabloid Ottawa Sun (3/10): "...This may
sound ingenuous, but what America should do seems
obvious. Dealing with North Korea is even simpler than
dealing with the South. There's growing unrest in South
Korea against the U.S. military presence which, since
the ceasefire in the war 50 years ago, has protected
the South from the North.... Some think America should
forget about Saddam Hussein and concentrate on bringing
North Korea to heel. That said, the nasty anti-American
demonstrations in South Korea demanding the U.S.
military leave are upsetting.... What's hard to
understand is why the
Americans stay if South Koreans want them gone. True,
the majority want American troops handy and know the
North is up to no good, but the massive protests that
lambaste the U.S. must irritate the hell out of
Americans. If I were President George Bush, I'd be
tempted to say to South Korea - publicly and bluntly -
that if you want us gone, we'll go; you work out what
you can with your fruitcake neighbour. That'd panic
South Koreans, and restore common sense.... Although
North Korea's nuclear weapons program is no direct
threat to America, selling nuclear technology to rogue
regimes and terrorists is. This is all Kim Jong-il has
to sell.... North Korea wants - demands - direct
negotiations with the U.S., which, in turn, prefers
multinational talks that include Russia, China,
Australia and Japan. Since Kim Jong Il reneges on
agreements and his word means nothing, why talk? What
North Korea wants is bribes and payoffs. Blackmail. All
it has to barter are weapons and soldiers. North Korea
has no allies, with the possible exception of Cuba's
Fidel Castro.... The soft approach rarely works with
tyrants. Once Saddam Hussein has been eliminated, North
Korea should be duck soup, providing President Bush
doesn't waver or waffle."
CELLUCCI