

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08OTTAWA311, CANADA: EMBASSY OTTAWA 2008 SPECIAL 301
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08OTTAWA311.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08OTTAWA311 | 2008-02-29 18:06 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO1701
OO RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0311/01 0601807
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 291807Z FEB 08
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7426
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 OTTAWA 000311
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
USTR FOR SULLIVAN, MELLE, GARDA
STATE FOR EEB/IPC (WALLACE) AND WHA/CA (RIOS)
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CA ECON ETRD KIPR
SUBJECT: CANADA: EMBASSY OTTAWA 2008 SPECIAL 301
RECOMMENDATION
REF: A. STATE 09475
¶B. 07 OTTAWA 2230
¶C. 07 OTTAWA 1962
¶D. 07 OTTAWA 1955
¶E. 07 OTTAWA 1764
¶F. 07 OTTAWA 1762
¶G. 07 OTTAWA 1639
¶H. 07 OTTAWA 1243
¶I. 07 OTTAWA 1076
¶J. 07 OTTAWA 887
¶K. 07 OTTAWA 783
¶L. 07 OTTAWA 765
¶M. 07 OTTAWA 691
¶N. 07 OTTAWA 448
¶O. 07 OTTAWA 187
¶P. 07 MONTREAL 150
¶Q. 07 MONTREAL 58
¶R. 07 TORONTO 466
¶S. 07 TORONTO 461
¶T. 07 TORONTO 366
¶U. 07 TORONTO 315
¶V. 07 TORONTO 120
¶W. 07 TORONTO 62
¶X. 07 TORONTO 60
¶Y. 07 TORONTO 45
Sensitive but unclassified. This message is part of an
internal U.S. Government deliberative process regarding the
annual Special 301 Report and must not be shared outside the
USG.
¶1. (sbu) Summary and Recommendation: Embassy Ottawa remains
frustrated by the Government of Canada,s continuing failure
to introduce - let alone pass - major copyright reform
legislation that would, inter alia, implement and ratify the
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Internet
treaties. Several recent factors compound this frustration,
including the fact that:
-- the Prime Minister told the President last August that
Canada would pass copyright legislation;
-- the November Speech from the Throne laying out the
government,s Parliamentary agenda stated that it would
"improve the protection of cultural and intellectual property
rights in Canada, including copyright reform;" and
-- senior GOC officials, especially Industry Minister
Prentice, repeatedly assured the Ambassador and senior
Mission Canada officers that the copyright bill would be
introduced "soon." Specifically, assurances were given that
the legislation had been finalized and would be introduced
prior to the Christmas recess, and then again immediately
upon Parliament's return in January. Neither of which
occurred.
In addition to the lack of Parliamentary action on a revised
copyright bill, the GOC continues to weigh recommendations
from an interagency task force that reviewed "best practices"
and regulations over a three-year period for improving
Canada,s IPR enforcement regime at the border, but has taken
no action so far.
¶2. (sbu) Despite our frustration, we must acknowledge
Canada,s close cooperation with the United States on
intellectual property matters in international fora, as well
as the excellent working relationship between U.S. and
Canadian border entities. In June 2007, the Canadian Royal
Mounted Police (RCMP) hosted the International Law
Enforcement IP Crime Conference in Niagara Falls, and will
co-host this year,s conference in Halifax with Interpol in
June. We also recognize that Canada has taken important
steps to improve protection and enforcement of intellectual
property rights over the last year. Last May, Parliament
enacted a law criminalizing illicit camcording in Canadian
movie theaters - a specific step that the U.S. sought in the
2007 Special 301 report on Canada. Throughout the last year,
Canadian law enforcement entities have carried out a number
of high-profile raids on pirating and counterfeiting
operations. We also believe - even in the face of repeated
delays - that the current government remains committed to
improving IPR protection in Canada.
¶3. (sbu) However, given the continuing failure of the GOC to
introduce a copyright bill into Parliament - coupled with the
apparent lack of significant steps to improve IPR protection
and enforcement along the border - Post reluctantly
Qand enforcement along the border - Post reluctantly
recommends that Canada be elevated to Special 301 Priority
OTTAWA 00000311 002 OF 004
Watch List in 2008. We would strongly recommend retaining
Canada on the Watch List if the Conservative government
introduces its copyright bill into Parliament in the coming
weeks before the release of the 2008 Special 301 report.
(Comment: We understand that elevation of Canada to the
Priority Watch List could adversely affect prospects for the
introduction and passage of a copyright bill in Parliament.
End comment) End Summary and Recommendation.
Copyright Legislation
¶4. (sbu) In December 2007, the GOC completed - and printed
into final bill form - major copyright reform legislation.
While details remain secret, Post understands that the
legislation would implement and ratify the WIPO Internet
Treaties (which Canada signed in 1997), and address Internet
Service Provider liability, circumvention devices,
educational use of copyrighted materials, and other
contentious issues.
¶5. (sbu) From December 2007 to mid-February, senior GOC
officials and well-informed private sector contacts assured
the Embassy that legislative calendar concerns were delaying
the copyright bill,s introduction into Parliament. Our
contacts downplayed the small - but increasingly vocal -
public opposition to copyright reform led by University of
Ottawa law professor Dr. Michael Geist. On February 25,
however, Industry Minister Prentice (please protect) admitted
to the Ambassador that some Cabinet members and Conservative
Members of Parliament - including MPs who won their ridings
by slim margins - opposed tabling the copyright bill now
because it might be used against them in the next federal
election. Prentice said the copyright bill had become a
"political" issue. He also indicated that elevating Canada
to the Special 301 Priority Watch List would make the issue
more difficult and would not be received well.
¶6. (sbu) On February 26, Liberal party leader Stephan Dion
made clear that his opposition party would not bring down the
minority Conservative government over the just-unveiled 2008
budget. Most political observers now believe that Dion,s
position pushes possible national elections until at least
the fall of 2008, and possibly even until October 2009 (the
next mandatory date). A senior GOC official told the
Ambassador on February 27 that the disappearing prospect of
an imminent election should make it easier to introduce the
copyright bill in Parliament, but offered no definitive
timetable for doing so. An influential Liberal MP on
intellectual property issues separately told EMIN on February
26 that the copyright bill would receive widespread support
from the Conservative, Liberal, and Bloc Quebecois parties if
and when the GOC sends it to Parliament. (Comment: James
Rajotte - chair of the Industry Committee, which would likely
receive a copyright bill - told the Ambassador on February 28
that the legislation would not have such smooth sailing. End
Comment) The Liberal MP stated that he has pressed Industry
Minister Prentice to release the legislation now, adding that
Canada is out of step with the rest of the (developed) world
on intellectual property rights and risks losing future
foreign investment. The MP dismissed the political
significance of the public efforts of Professor Geist and
hinted that Canada,s possible elevation to the Priority
Watch list would not be seen as a hostile U.S. action, but
show that its IPR regime is weak vis-a-vis its G-7 partners.
The MP indicated that other nations, especially France, are
also lobbying Parliament on a copyright bill. EMIN learned
Qalso lobbying Parliament on a copyright bill. EMIN learned
from his French Embassy counterpart that she would be
briefing Parliamentarians on this issue on March 4. Industry
Committee chair Rajotte separately confirmed this meeting
with the Ambassador.
¶7. (sbu) On February 27, EMIN and Econcouns were summoned to
Foreign Affairs Canada to receive the informal views of the
Canadian government on the Special 301 process. The meeting
was chaired by Doug George, the Director of DFAIT,s
Intellectual Property office and included representatives of
ten Canadian government agencies, including Industry Canada,
Canadian Heritage, Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), and
the Canadian Embassy in Washington. After the usual
denouncement of the Special 301 process (which we hear every
year), George outlined the cooperative measures that Canada
undertakes with USG agencies and Interpol on IPR enforcement.
He stated that this cooperation, together with Canada,s
federal and local law enforcement efforts, gets short shrift
in USTR,s description of Canada in the Special 301 report.
¶8. (sbu) However, George and Industry Canada,s Susan
Bincoletto could not give EMIN any indication of when the
OTTAWA 00000311 003 OF 004
revised copyright bill would appear in Parliament. CBSA did
not know whether the C$75 million announced in the recent
budget over the next two years will be targeted toward
improving IPR enforcement. There was also no indication as
to when CBSA officials would get "ex officio" powers to
improve their enforcement efforts even though many Canadian
officials believe that this is needed. Finally, George
cautioned that if Canada were retained on the 301 Watch List
- or even elevated to the Priority Watch List - it could
affect future Canadian cooperation on IPR as well as give
ammunition to Dr. Geist and his acolytes, who see a revised
copyright bill as a "U.S. plot." In answer to EMIN,s
question, George claimed that only the United States is
pressing Canada on copyright reform. The EU, individual
European countries, and Japan do raise IPR issues, but George
implied that these efforts are perfunctory.
IPR Enforcement
¶9. (sbu) After three years of examining "best practices" and
regulations for improving IPR enforcement on Canada,s
borders, an interagency group made formal recommendations to
Canadian ministers in the fall of 2007. To date, the GOC has
yet to act on the recommendations, and the 2008 budget
(released on February 26) contained no apparent IPR-related
enforcement measures. In the past, GOC officials have
indicated that Canada should join the other G-7 countries in
updating its border enforcement regime and that border
officials should receive "ex officio" powers to seize
suspected counterfeit and pirated goods. Current
arrangements between customs officials and the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) for seizing suspected illegal goods are
cumbersome and relatively ineffective.
¶10. (sbu) Notably, the RCMP has increased its attention on
counterfeit and pirated goods,particularly relating to public
safety, health, and organized crime. Last June, the RCMP
hosted the International Law Enforcement IP Crime Conference
in Niagara Falls that was well attended by officials from the
United States and other countries. This year,s conference
in Halifax will be co-hosted by the RCMP and Interpol, June
24-26. In addition, Canadian law enforcement officials are
boosting action against illegal pirating and counterfeiting
operations. These illustrative 2007 examples are excerpted
from a more exhaustive list compiled by ConGen Toronto:
-- Toronto RCMP investigators seize pirated DVD copies of the
East Indian World Premiere movie Guru. Unauthorized copies
of the movie,s soundtrack and another popular East Indian
film also seized (February 21);
-- An Ontario husband and wife are arrested after police
officers seize over 750 counterfeit DVD,s at two convenience
stores with an estimated value of C$15,000 (March 5);
-- Windsor RCMP officers charge three men with 22 counts of
importing counterfeit goods. Examination of the goods reveal
23 different brand-name products with a value of C$250,000
(April 2);
-- In connection with satellite signal theft, Durham police
seize C$60,000 worth of satellite receivers, dishes, and
computer equipment. Estimated annual lost revenue lost is
C$240,000 (July 13);
-- Toronto police seize more than 20,000 music CDs along with
movies, video games, and equipment after a six-month
investigation initiated by the Canadian Recording Industry
Association. Police also seize cash, business documents, and
four CD/DVD burning towers, each with 6-8 burners, capable of
producing some 770 recorded discs per hour, or 30,720 discs
Qproducing some 770 recorded discs per hour, or 30,720 discs
in a 40-hour week (July 17);
-- Ontario police raid twenty-two locations in Mississauga,
Brampton, Burlington and Toronto, arresting 18 people and
seizing over 40,000 pirated DVD movies worth an estimated
C$800,000 as well as manufacturing equipment capable of
producing C$21 million worth of pirated DVD movies per year
(August 21);
-- RCMP and the York police officers search eight stores at
the Pacific Mall in Markham and two retail outlets and a
storage unit in the Dynasty Mall in Toronto. Several arrests
are made, and more than 15,000 DVD,s seized. Also seized
are 65 DVD burners located at a private residence (August
31); and
-- Toronto police recover C$10 million worth of counterfeit
OTTAWA 00000311 004 OF 004
luxury merchandise in a series of raids on local retailers
(December 3).
Canada Moves Against Camcording
¶11. (sbu) In June 2007, the government criminalized the act
of recording ("camcording") a movie in a theater without
consent of the theater manager. The legislation was broadly
supported by all political parties, and moved through
Parliament in less than a month. Several individuals have
been arrested under the new law and are currently pending
trial. Industry representatives have told Post that the
problem of illicit camcording in Canada - which was cited in
the 2007 Special 301 Report - has been significantly reduced
by this new law.
Pharmaceutical Concern
¶12. (sbu) The U.S. pharmaceutical industry remains generally
pleased with the October 2006 amendments to Canada,s data
protection regulations, and considers them a significant step
forward. Some U.S.-based pharmaceutical companies, however,
have raised concerns that recent judicial and Health Canada
decisions could be putting a number of existing drug patents
at risk. The U.S.-based companies believe that a further
regulatory change allowing them the Right of Appeal of an
adverse administrative decision would help alleviate their
concerns. Post understands that a proposed regulatory
amendment addressing this issue may soon be published in the
Canada Gazette for public comment.
Recommendation: No Copyright Bill Equals Special 301
Priority Watch List
¶13. (sbu) We believe that the minority Conservative
government is committed to improving the protection and
enforcement of intellectual property rights. However, given
the GOC,s failure so far to introduce a copyright reform
bill in Parliament - and the lack of significant steps to
strengthen IPR enforcement and protection on the border - the
Embassy reluctantly recommends that Canada be elevated to
Special 301 Priority Watch List. We would strongly recommend
retaining Canada on the Watch List if the government
introduces its copyright bill into the House of Commons
before the end of April. (Comment: Elevation of Canada to
the Priority Watch List could adversely affect prospects for
the introduction and passage of a copyright bill in
Parliament. End comment)
¶14. (sbu) This cable and its recommendation have been
reviewed and approved by the Ambassador.
Visit Canada,s Economy and Environment Forum at
http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/can ada
WILKINS