

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08TORONTO58, The Lake Erie Commercial Fishing Industry
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TORONTO58.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08TORONTO58 | 2008-02-29 15:03 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Consulate Toronto |
VZCZCXRO1564
PP RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHON #0058/01 0601517
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 291517Z FEB 08
FM AMCONSUL TORONTO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2363
INFO RUCNCAN/ALCAN COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/HQ EPA WASHINGTON DC
RUEHC/DEPT OF INTERIOR WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 TORONTO 000058
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O.12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV PGOV PREL CA
SUBJECT: The Lake Erie Commercial Fishing Industry
Sensitive But Unclassified - Protect Accordingly.
¶1. (U) SUMMARY: Managing fish stocks in Lake Erie, which supports a
multi-million dollar commercial fishing industry that supports
thousands of jobs - has become a point of contention on both sides
of the nearby U.S.-Canada border. Dwindling fish stocks have
prompted Ontario and the U.S. states bordering Lake Erie to decrease
their fishing quotas and restrict fishing in other ways. In
response, commercial fishermen on both sides of the border are
asking their respective court systems to force provincial and state
governments to restructure the way quotas are set. Both Ontario and
U.S.-based commercial fisherman assert that the U.S. sport fishing
industry, which generates significantly more revenue for state
agencies, has been unfairly gaining quota at the expense of
commercial fishing. The Lake Erie Committee (LEC), the
intergovernmental body that sets fishing quotas in Ontario and the
U.S., is required to base catch quotas on scientific evidence
generated by field researchers. Commercial fishermen argue that the
LEC has for years based its fishing quota decisions not on science,
but on political and economic biases. Ontario's Ministry of Natural
Resources (OMNR) is reviewing the request of Ontario commercial
fishermen that Ontario unilaterally restructure how it manages
quotas. END SUMMARY.
--------------------------------------------- -
Lake Erie Committee Sets Annual Fishing Quotas
--------------------------------------------- -
¶2. (U) State and provincial fishery managers from Michigan, New
York, Ohio, Ontario, and Pennsylvania comprise the Lake Erie
Committee (LEC), one of five committees (one for each Great Lake)
that manage fish stocks in the Great Lakes under the direction of
the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, a Canadian and U.S. agency
established in 1955 by the Canadian/U.S. Great Lakes Convention on
Fisheries. Each year the LEC sets the total allowable catch (TAC)
for walleye and yellow perch, the two quota species shared by
Canadian and American fishermen. The TAC, representing the number
of fish that can be caught by sport and commercial fishers without
putting the stocks at risk, is allocated to each jurisdiction by an
area-based sharing formula. Ontario then defines the fishing quotas
for its own fisherman within the limits defined by the LEC's annual
TAC. The LEC's decisions have historically been based on fish stock
data provided by field researchers.
-----------------------------------
Ontario Fishermen Appeal the Quotas
-----------------------------------
¶3. (U) Ontario has 212 licensed commercial fishermen, based mostly
out of Wheatley and Kingsville. Ontario fishermen catch fish worth
about C$30 million a year at the docks. Once these fish are
processed in plants, the value of Ontario's annual catch jumps to
more than C$200 million, and employs 1,500 to 2,000 people. Gill
nets, which are banned in all of Lake Erie's U.S. states, are legal
and used widely in Ontario. Commercial netting of walleye or other
species of fish is not banned in Ontario waters.
¶4. (U) Since 2001, Ontario commercial fisherman have been openly
disputing the province's delegation of responsibility for setting
quotas to the LEC. Ontario fishermen argue that annual TAC
allocations of yellow perch and walleye are based on U.S. economic
and political biases, rather than scientific evidence. They assert
that the LEC structure (one member per jurisdiction bordering the
lake) and consensual decision-making process are inherently unfair
to Ontario, which owns about half of Lake Erie.
¶5. (U) During 2001-2004, TAC allocations were cut to their lowest
levels since Ontario first implemented specific fish quotas for Lake
Erie. Walleye TAC for 2001, 2002, and 2003 was set at a level 56%
lower than for 2000 and the final 2004 quotas for Ontario were about
27% lower than the 2003 allocations.
¶6. (U) In 2003 the LEC announced its intention to cut 2004 quotas in
the case of walleye by 40-60%, well before the 2003 fish stock data
was available. Ontario fishermen saw this as a clear admission that
the annual data analysis process was a mere formality used to
justify political decisions that had no scientific basis. Yellow
perch and walleye were hatched in record numbers in 2003, but U.S.
state fish regulatory agencies refused to admit the relevance of the
2003 data to the 2004 decision making process, further fuelling
resentment among Ontario commercial fishermen. The Ontario Ministry
of Natural Resources insisted that the LEC revisit the 2003 TAC
decision. The U.S. agencies, led by the Ohio Department of Natural
Resources, forced Ontario into a mediation process adjudicated by
the Great Lakes Fishery Commission. The mediation process
ultimately failed to produce a resolution, although cuts to the
walleye TAC ended up being somewhat lower in 2004 than had been
called for in 2003.
¶7. (U) After the mediation failed, Ontario's commercial fishermen
TORONTO 00000058 002 OF 003
formally appealed the 2004 Lake Erie walleye quotas to Ontario's
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act Hearing Officer. In his report
to the Minister of Natural Resources, the Hearing Officer wrote,
"...my opinion is that the current walleye quotas for Lake Erie are
unsupported by the data available at the hearing, and are therefore
not reasonable for the conservation of fish." Then-Ontario Minister
of Natural Resources (MNR), David Ramsey, cited obligations to the
LEC process in his justification for not unilaterally increasing
Ontario's TAC. Ontario commercial fisherman subsequently argued
that the province has inappropriately handed over its responsibility
to manage fish stocks to the LEC. The LEC determines the annual TAC
for all of Lake Erie, and, although MNR retains the absolute
authority to set Ontario's fish quotas, only once, in 1984, has the
Minister exercised that right outside of the LEC process.
¶8. (U) In March 2007, the LEC lowered the Lake Erie walleye TAC to
5.36 million fish, a dramatic decrease from the 9.886 million fish
allowed in 2006, reflecting poor hatches and recruitment in 2002,
2004, and 2006. The LEC also reduced the 2007 TAC for yellow perch
to 11.389 million pounds, down from 16.48 million pounds in 2006.
The LEC will not announce the 2008 TAC limits until March, but
commercial fishermen on both sides of the border expect the quotas
to be further reduced this year.
-----------------------------------------
Ohio Having Trouble Enforcing Fish Quotas
-----------------------------------------
¶9. (U) The Ohio State Division of Wildlife, has publicly stated that
it cannot effectively manage its fisheries because Division
scientists believe they cannot trust the fish catch data that
commercial fishermen report to them.
18 Ohio commercial fishermen and 7 businesses have been convicted of
over-fishing about 120 tons of regulated fish in the Ohio waters of
Lake Erie during the past few years. In June 2005, in Cuyahoga
County, Ohio, a two-year undercover investigation of commercial trap
net fishermen ended with Cuyahoga County prosecutors indicting 14
people and five businesses for money laundering, theft, and
receiving stolen property, including 40-80 tons of unreported yellow
perch.
¶10. (U) In a separate case, on January 24, 2006, in Sandusky, Ohio,
the captain of a boat belonging to a Port Clinton commercial fishing
company was fined US$12,100 for his part in a racketeering ring that
illegally netted thousands of pounds of yellow perch from Lake Erie,
according to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR)
Division of Wildlife. In another case, announced on March 14, 2006,
in Columbus, Ohio, a Port Clinton commercial fishing company and its
owners, Richard Stinson and Orville Stinson, were ordered to pay
US$160,000 for their part in a racketeering ring that illegally
netted 40 tons of yellow perch which is equal to 6,133 daily sport
fishing bag limits.
¶11. (SBU) According to Jim Marshall, assistant chief of Ohio's
wildlife division, Ohio anglers exceeded their 2007 perch quotas of
833,000 pounds for the western basin of Lake Erie by more than 20%,
or 200,000 pounds. Commercial trap-netters were under their
allotted share of 216,000 pounds and sport fishing alone took some
800,000 pounds of perch, facts which Marshall says, will have a
significant impact on determining suitable fishing quotas for 2008.
--------------------------------------------- ---------
Fishing in U.S. Waters Is Evolving, Especially in Ohio
--------------------------------------------- ---------
¶12. (U) U.S. state governments have been shifting fish catch quotas
to the sport fishing industry away from the commercial fishing
industry on Lake Erie. U.S states issue only 32 commercial fishing
licenses: Ohio has 18; Pennsylvania has 11; Michigan has 3; and New
York has 0. There is no legal commercial fishery for walleye in
U.S. waters of Lake Erie, except for Pennsylvania waters, but both
walleye and perch are promoted as high quality sport fish by state
agencies.
¶13. (U) Ohio, wracked by fish poaching scandals, has been tightening
regulations on its small commercial fishing industry. Though the
volume of fish taken by commercial and sport fishermen in Ohio
waters is about equal, Ohio's sport fishing industry generates about
US$700 million in annual license fee revenue for the Department of
Natural Resources, while commercial fishing licenses provide only
US$10 million per year. In November 2006 the Ohio legislature
debated buying-out all the remaining commercial fishing licenses in
Ohio, but the bill failed to pass the legislature. Ohio Senate Bill
77, which requires commercial fishermen to submit to surveillance of
their activities, and to purchase, install, and maintain vessel and
catch monitoring devices, entered into force in October 2007. On
January 29, 2008, a newly formed group, the Great Lakes Commercial
Fishermen, announced that it has asked a federal court in Toledo,
Ohio to prevent promulgation of the regulations that would implement
TORONTO 00000058 003 OF 003
Ohio Senate Bill 77.
--------------------------------------------- ---------
Ontario Commercial Fishermen Sue Government of Ontario
--------------------------------------------- ---------
¶14. (U) Ontario's commercial fishermen have major concerns about the
structure and process of the LEC. They argue that the overwhelming
dominance of U.S. agencies in the management of a resource that is
shared roughly equally between two countries magnifies the conflict
between sport fishing and commercial fishing. The LEC, made up of
five members -- four U.S. states (New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio,
Michigan) and Ontario, operates by consensus. Ontario Commercial
Fisheries Association's (OCFA) Executive Director Peter Meisenheimer
argues "The LEC is a caricature of consensus with U.S. agencies
imposing their ideological opposition on the commercial fishing
industry through their numerical dominance... Committee decisions
are driven by an agenda to maximize the sale of sport fishing
licenses."
¶15. (U) OCFA Executive Director Meisenheimer says the primary threat
to Lake Erie's commercial fishing industry is clear cut: commercial
fishing is in a battle of survival against sport fishing advocates,
who have a vastly different view of how the lakes should be managed.
In September 2007, two Lake Erie fishermen announced that they were
taking the Ontario government to court on behalf of Ontario's
commercial fishing industry to challenge how fishing quotas are set.
Their suit, which is scheduled to be heard in April, alleges that
the LEC is favoring the U.S. sports fishing industry at the expense
of Ontario's commercial fishing industry.
---------------------------------------------
Ontario Fishermen Blame U.S. for Over-fishing
---------------------------------------------
¶16. (SBU) In response to dwindling fish stocks, the OMNR
unilaterally reduced Lake Erie commercial fishing quotas on January
1, 2008, alleging that the cuts were a combination of low fish
reproduction rates and U.S. over-fishing. OMNR has not publicly
announced fishing quota reductions; instead commercial fisherman are
being so-advised when they purchase their fishing licenses for the
2008 season. OMNR is expected to formally issue a press release
with the 2008 fishing quotas after the LEC meets on March 17, 2008.
¶17. (U) There is no general trend in fish stocks across the Great
Lakes that would explain the LEC's need to reduce TAC for commercial
fishing in Lake Erie. Different species of fish in each of the
lakes are experiencing different population fluctuations. In the
U.S. states that border Lake Erie, commercial fishing has been
significantly reduced. Ontario and U.S. commercial fisherman both
are blaming the lucrative sport fishing industry for reducing their
livelihood.
¶18. (SBU) COMMENT: Of the five Great Lakes, Lake Erie provides a
uniquely cooperative fisheries management case study as the two
countries have sought to manage one of the world's largest
freshwater commercial fisheries. Erie is the only lake with a
bi-national committee that sets an overall fish quota for the lake;
individual jurisdictions independently set fishing quotas on all of
the other Great Lakes. The cross-border management relationship
embodied in the LEC, has highlighted a growing rift between
commercial fishermen from both countries and the sport fishing
industry. The commercial versus sport fishing dispute is
exacerbated by the four to one ratio of U.S. states and Ontario that
make up the LEC. This has led commercial fisherman on both sides of
the border to ask their respective court systems to force provincial
and state governments to restructure the way quotas are set.
Ontario commercial fishermen are seeking to persuade the provincial
government to abandon the LEC quota-setting process in favor of
unilateral action. Ontario's new Minister of Natural Resources told
the Consul General earlier this month that she is looking into the
complaints and studying the whole issue. Ontario politicians,
facing significant job losses in the struggling manufacturing
sector, will be particularly sensitive to potential job losses in
the province's commercial fishing industry. End Comment.
NAY
1