

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07BERLIN244, JANUARY 23 MEETING OF G-8 GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07BERLIN244.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07BERLIN244 | 2007-02-07 10:10 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Berlin |
VZCZCXYZ0014
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHRL #0244/01 0381041
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 071041Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6948
INFO RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 7911
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1693
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0953
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 8436
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 0190
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 1363
UNCLAS BERLIN 000244
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR ISN/CTR, EUR, WHA/CAN, AND EAP/J
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL ETTC KNNP CBW TRGY GM JA RS CA
SUBJECT: JANUARY 23 MEETING OF G-8 GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP
WORKING GROUP IN BERLIN
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The G-8 Global Partnership Working Group
(GPWG) met January 23 in Berlin under the German Presidency.
The Chair informed partners that the next meeting, February
27-28, would focus on the mid-term review of the 10-year
Global Partnership (GP) program, with the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and NGOs being invited to attend.
The Chair then addressed preparations for a review and
assessment report of the GP's first five years, noting the
need to produce a review prior to the June 6-8 G-8 Summit.
After the Chair requested responses to a German-produced
questionnaire and a French-prepared matrix of GP projects,
the Russian delegation stated it opposed any reference in a
GP document to Russia as "a proliferation threat." Following
that discussion, the group discussed the review document and
the status of Chemical Weapons Destruction (CWD) projects in
Russia, with the Russian delegation complaining about the
slow pace of receiving funds. The Russian delegation next
gave a presentation on removing and securing Radioisotopic
Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs), and the group discussed the
status of decommissioning and dismantling Russian nuclear
submarines. Canada's delegation announced the construction
of a biosecurity facility in Bishkek; the U.S. delegation
raised the issue of the future of the science centers in
Russia and Ukraine. The Chair closed with the announcement
that Germany would send procedural information concerning the
review process to the delegations and requested they consider
options for presenting the review report at the G-8 Summit.
End Summary.
¶2. (SBU) German MFA Commissioner for Economic Affairs and
Sustainable Development Viktor Elbling chaired the opening
session and began by informing the delegations that the
GPWG's February 27 session will include presentations by NGOs
or other invitees selected from a list of proposed invitees
by GP members. Elbling also announced that Germany had
invited the IAEA to give a general overview of the global
threat of unsecured nuclear material, that Germany's Federal
Intelligence Service (BND) will contribute a segment on the
threat of nuclear material to Germany's overall presentation,
and that all partners are invited to include input from their
intelligence services in their presentations. He added that
the think tank, Foundation for Science and Policy, (Stiftung
fuer Wissenschaft und Politik, SWP), is the German NGO
designated to address the first day of February's session.
Elbling asked all members to respond by January 31 with their
proposed invitees. With little discussion, it was agreed
that GP donor states will also be invited to send proposed
NGO participants.
¶3. (SBU) Elbling turned to the major item for consideration,
the review/assessment report of the GP's first five years.
To encourage a structured discussion, he requested responses
to a previously circulated German-produced questionnaire and
a French-produced matrix evaluation scheme. French Delegate
Camille Grand suggested the matrix might be useful as a
quantitative tool for assessing the progress of GP projects.
Before discussion could begin, Russian Delegate Anatoly
Antonov said Russia would not permit any GP document to refer
to Russia "as a proliferation threat." Antonov reiterated
the statement several times and mentioned dissatisfaction
with the status of the CWD projects in Russia. He claimed
contributors to the CWD projects are lagging in their
allocation of funds and added Russia could not support the
German-produced questionnaire. Nevertheless, Antonov
insisted Russia wanted to improve cooperation with members on
CWD.
¶4. (SBU) The British, Canadian, French, EU Commission, and
Italian delegates, along with Deputy Assistant Secretary
Semmel, all acknowledged Russia's concerns about the slow
pace of some projects' funding, but reaffirmed their
continued commitment to all projects under way. The
delegates agreed the review/assessment was the basis for
moving the GP forward during the next five years and beyond
and said Russia would not be singled out as a "proliferation
threat." Italian Delegate Antonio Catalano pointed out that
Russia itself has voiced concerns over the CWD program,
thereby acknowledging concerns over proliferation on its
territory.
¶5. (SBU) Antonov continued, however, despite comments from
partners that emphasized the common threats faced by all
states. He claimed the U.S. has only given 10 percent of its
pledged amount for CWD. Noting the proliferation threats
around the world, including in the U.S., DAS Semmel pointed
out that pledged funds are not disbursed all at once but in
incremental amounts, typically annually, in accordance with
government budgets. He said the proper calculation is not
the percentage spent of the total pledged amount but the
percentage of funds made available by donor countries up to
that point.
¶6. (SBU) After Elbling brought the discussion back to the
review document, the delegates generally agreed the document
must be succinct and clear to leaders and the public. DAS
Semmel urged that members use the review to reflect on GPWG
assumptions. He suggested that as the review process
continues, some surprises may lie ahead and the members will
be compelled to consider what happens after the GP program
ends in 2012.
¶7. (SBU) At this point, German MFA International Energy and
Nuclear Energy Policy Office Director Thomas Meister replaced
Elbling as Chair. Meister gave a short presentation on the
status of CWD progress. Russian Delegate Antonov announced
that the process of donor countries funding CWD projects
through G-8 members, known as piggybacking, is not working.
He claimed the UK, Canada, and others are lagging far behind
in the work on their projects, and cited the need to finish
the current projects by the end of 2009. He also reiterated
an announcement made at the November 2006 meeting that Russia
plans to allocate four billion dollars, in addition to the
two billion already on record, to complete the CWD goals by
¶2012.
¶8. (SBU) The EU Commission, Italy, the UK, and Canada, and
others disputed Antonov's claims. Canadian Delegate Troy
Lulashnyk stated piggybacking is working and that Canada and
all other participants are completely committed to resolving
the current project delays. DAS Semmel noted some delays
have resulted from disagreements over estimates and took
satisfactory note of Russia's additional four billion dollar
commitment to the GP process. Antonov suggested members flag
the issue of discrepancies between Russia's figures and those
of other member states.
¶9. (SBU) Turning to RTGs, Meister noted the need for improved
cooperation on their removal. The Russian delegation gave a
status report on RTG removals and referred to a master plan
scheduled for completion March 8 that will be a guide for
funding the removals. The Russians calculated that, of the
581 remaining RTGs, about 35 will be removed annually until
all are gone. The UK delegates informed the group that the
UK has a good relationship with Rosatom, the Russian Ministry
for Atomic Energy Agency. The Canadian delegates announced
that, with U.S. cooperation, the removal of 16 RTGs will be
completed in Russia's Northern areas in 2007.
¶10. (SBU) The discussion of Russian nuclear submarine
dismantlement took place without incident. All delegates
delivered positive statements about the status of their
respective dismantlement efforts. The Canadian delegates
spoke of their plan to work with other members to dismantle
two Russian nuclear submarines per year "until there are none
left," and announced they are shifting their efforts to the
Far East. (Note: Submarine dismantlement in the Russian Far
East lags behind that in the Northern Baltic area. End
Note.) DAS Semmel drew attention to recent reports that
scrap metal from the submarines is generating funds that help
offset the costs of dismantlement.
¶11. (SBU) Canadian Delegate Ann Pollack announced a new
biosecurity project was under way at a human and animal
research facility in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, and informed
members that both the International Science and Technology
Center in Russia and the Science and Technology Center in
Ukraine are also working on five-year reviews. She said
Canada is considering sending a science center representative
to the NGO session in February. DAS Semmel added that, as
the evolution of the science centers is being considered,
they are, in some ways, going through an assessment similar
to that of the GP. Their future must also reflect the new
global realities in which the Russian economy has improved
since 2001 and can pay for the work of nuclear scientists
without so much outside support. Russian Delegate Valery
Biryukov informed the group Russia enjoys good cooperation
with the UK on working with former weapons scientists.
Biryukov expressed satisfaction with the current "Nuclear
Cities" project and announced that Rosatom is ready to sign a
new agreement.
¶12. (SBU) Meister closed with an announcement that all
members will soon receive information on the procedures for
the next steps in the review process and options to be
considered for presenting the review at the G-8 Summit. One
option is to replace the GP annual report with the review.
The other is to cite the review in the report and disseminate
the report as a stand-alone document.
¶13. (SBU) Canada followed with an announcement it will host a
reception at its Embassy the evening of February after the
NGO presentations. At that event, the Canadian Delegation
will present materials to show the positive results of GP
cooperation over the past five years.
¶14. (SBU) Comment: The GPWG partners are looking for ways to
bring some G-8 Summit attention to GP's successes to date, to
use the process to underscore the need to expand GP
priorities, and to re-energize the GP as a tool for reducing
the global threat of WMD. Over lunch, the Germans confirmed
our view that Russia,s primary, perhaps only, concern is
that the results of the review process might cause members to
stray away from CWD and submarine dismantlement commitments
toward new "priorities." The NGO session on February 27 will
be an important event in the GP process this year. It
appears our German hosts are carefully structuring the NGO
presentations in order to stimulate the review process and
perhaps defuse or reduce political differences among the
members over what the review should say. End Comment.
¶15. (U) Heads of Delegations:
--Viktor Elbling, Germany
--Anatoly Antonov, Russian Federation
--Camille Grand, France
--Antonio Catalano di Mellili, Italy
--Atsushi Kato, Japan
--Berenice Gare, United Kingdom
--Andrew Semmel, United States
--Troy Lulashnyk, Canada
--Lars-Erik Lundin, European Commission
--Tomas Reyes Ortega, EU Council
¶16. (U) DAS Semmel has cleared this cable.
TIMKEN JR