

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA875, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY CHERTOFF
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA875.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA875 | 2005-03-23 21:09 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000875
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR WHA/CAN, EB/TRA, AND CA/VO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECIN ASEC PREL CVIS CA PSEPC
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY CHERTOFF
MAINTAINS THE DIALOGUE WITH COUNTERPART DEPUTY PRIME
MINISTER MCLELLAN
REF: OTTAWA 774
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED--PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY.
¶1. (U) Summary: Handguns entering Canada illegally from the
United States and divergence between Canadian and U.S. visa
policies were two unscripted items discussed during
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michael
Chertoff's and Canadian Deputy Prime Minister (DPM) Anne
McLellan's first meeting on March 17. In general the
meetings discussed progress on implementation of the Smart
Border Action Plan, including critical infrastructure
protection, which is a priority for the Canadians. The
Secretary and DPM looked at progress toward remedying the
SIPDIS
congestion at Windsor-Detroit, the busiest border crossing.
The two leaders also discussed the Buffalo pre-clearance
project, which has so far been stalled primarily over the
issue of legal authorities. Finally, Chertoff and McLellan
participated in a joint press conference on the Top Officials
Three Exercise (TOPOFF 3). End summary.
¶2. (U) The March 17 meeting was the first occasion for
Secretary Chertoff to meet DPM McLellan since the Secretary
SIPDIS
assumed his position. Their meeting continued the tradition
of close cooperation and frequent consultation established by
McLellan's predecessor John Manley and Chertoff's predecessor
Tom Ridge. In December of 2001 Manley and Ridge had signed
the Smart Border Declaration which laid out a 30-point Action
Plan to identify and address security risks while at the same
time facilitating the legitimate flow of people and goods
across the border. Joint working groups comprised of U.S.
DHS agencies and their Canadian counterparts have met
regularly over the past three years to task recommended
actions and track implementation of the Action Plan.
¶3. (SBU) The DPM and Senior Assistant Deputy Minister of the
Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada
(PSEPC) Paul Kennedy explained to Secretary Chertoff the
long-standing partnership between the U.S. and Canada in
policing our shared border, a relationship embodied in the
Cross Border Crime Forum. Since the 9/11 attacks in the
U.S., Canada has sought to strengthen its national and
international security posture, spending over CAN $9 billion
on this effort. Canadian National Security Advisor Rob
Wright spoke about the history of the 1995 Shared Border
Accord and how the GOC is trying to do its part to implement
Smart Border activities, some of which (NEXUS and the Safe
Third Country Agreement) had been identified pre-9/11.
Canadian law enforcement agencies have long participated with
their U.S. counterparts in targeting possible cross-border
criminal and terrorist activities; this relationship has been
formalized under the Integrated Border Enforcement Team
(IBET) program. In addition to physical and infrastructure
enhancements to bolster security, Canada also undertook major
legislative initiatives, such as the Security Act of 2002,
which increases the ability of law enforcement agencies to
combat terrorism specifically. Paul Kennedy observed that
the revised Anti-Terror Act presently before Parliament is in
some ways complementary to the U.S. Patriot Act.
¶4. (SBU) PSEPC has particular responsibility for critical
infrastructure protection. PSEPC officials noted that 60
percent of Canadian infrastructure (e.g., gas pipelines,
electric power lines, tunnels, bridges, and railroads) has
some level of connectivity to the U.S. PSEPC suggested that
there is a need for common risk assessment standards, greater
sharing of information regarding threat levels, and more
joint exercises. PSEPC sees as immediate challenges the
removal of high risk threats and security on the Great Lakes
and St. Lawrence Seaway.
¶5. (SBU) PSEPC also raised the problem of cross-border
firearms smuggling, with DPM McLellan referring specifically
to smuggled pistols coming into Canada from the U.S. and
being used in drug-based gang violence in Toronto. (Comment:
Indeed, Canadian media reported the previous day on the
conviction of two gun smugglers, including one who brought 23
handguns into the country through the Windsor tunnel. End
comment.) Secretary Chertoff asked if Canada experiences the
same problem with handguns as the U.S.; the DPM replied that
it does not, because Canadian law does not recognize a right
to bear arms.
¶6. (SBU) The U.S. raised the issue of visas. Visa policy
coordination is one of the items on the Smart Border Action
Plan. (Comment: It is also one of the most touchy due to
sovereignty and privacy considerations. End comment.)
Secretary Chertoff asked about Canadian visa issuance
SIPDIS
procedures and if his understanding is correct that a mail-in
program was part of the process. The DPM and Rob Wright said
that wasn't true, that interviews were done. They added that
due to more stringent and demanding procedures, especially
for some former visa waiver countries, there is a large
backlog of visa applications. Wright said that when security
is the issue, there should be harmonization between the U.S.
and Canada. The U.S. asked about the wisdom of Canada not
requiring visas for South Koreans, particularly given reports
that South Korean women are smuggled through Canada into the
U.S. to work in the sex trade. The DPM acknowledged that
Canada had recently reconfirmed its position of not requiring
visas of South Koreans, but she said she would consult with
the Minister of Immigration on this U.S. question and
concern.
¶7. (SBU) When discussion turned to the Windsor-Detroit
Gateway and what seems to be a rather long lead time (until
2013) to actually implement any of the long-term solutions
currently on the table, DPM McLellan warned that the USG and
GOC should remain objective and not prejudge the five options
currently being considered. She added that the process is
underway (beginning with the announcement of contracts for
environmental impact assessments) and should be allowed to
move forward. The DPM and her staff suggested that President
Bush and Prime Minister Martin should continue to underscore
the importance for both nations of finding a solution to
easing congestion at the Windsor-Detroit corridor. Agencies
of both governments are currently implementing short-term
solutions to meet the 25 Percent Challenge (to reduce transit
times by 25 percent over 12 months) announced during the
December 2004 Ridge-McLellan meetings.
¶8. (SBU) The U.S. and Canada have identified the
Buffalo-Fort Erie crossing as the potential site for a pilot
land pre-clearance project. This pilot presents a different
sort of challenge than that at Windsor-Detroit, however, in
that it envisions national enforcement officers operating on
foreign territory: Canadian CBSA on the U.S. side, and U.S.
CBP in Canada. There are many vexing questions concerning
this arrangement, including the extent of authorities
(search, detain, arrest), immunities, and foremost perhaps,
the carrying of firearms. Other problems include the
question of whether or not a person intending to cross the
border would be allowed to withdraw once an inspection has
started. Secretary Chertoff acknowledged the difficulty
posed by the asymmetrical authorities currently exercised by
CBP and CBSA. Rob Wright said that mechanisms could be
agreed upon, such as targeting, that would allow the project
to work. DHS staff explained that a study of the Buffalo
pre-clearance pilot is underway. Operational analysis must
be done, with a view to identifying the greatest facilitation
and maximization of resources. A progress report is
anticipated in May. All agreed that a way can be found to
allow the pilot project to go forward.
¶9. (SBU) Looking at opportunities for future collaboration,
Rob Wright said that Canada's National Security Policy will
continue to bind the U.S. and Canadian security strategies
ever closer together. The Bush-Martin and Ridge-McLellan
meetings in December 2004 were important steps in creating
the environment to build stronger security ties. The March
23 "Trio" meeting in Texas would provide another opportunity.
Wright commented that domain awareness, the broadening of
shared procedures at the borders, and economic imperatives
should tie the countries together. Secretary Chertoff and
DPM McLellan will be in Texas for the roll out of the
Security and Prosperity Partnership.
¶10. (U) Secretary Chertoff and DPM McLellan (and the British
Home Secretary via pre-recorded video) held a press
conference announcing the TOPOFF 3 exercise April 4 - 8 that
will simulate a terrorist attack to test emergency plans and
procedures. The U.S., Canada, and the United Kingdom are the
principal participants with 13 other countries, including
Mexico, as observers. In their press statements the
Secretary and DPM emphasized the U.S.-Canadian partnership to
SIPDIS
thwart terrorism while at the same time facilitating the free
flow of legitimate commerce and people.
¶11. (U) Comment: This was a successful first meeting
between Secretary Chertoff and DPM McLellan, which will help
them move through a full bilateral agenda. There remain,
however, many legal (enforcement authorities, privacy issues)
and political (sovereignty) hurdles to be overcome in
achieving optimal cooperation on border security.
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
DICKSON