

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 03OTTAWA1924, SCENE-SETTER FOR TRI- AND BILATERAL ENERGY MEETINGS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03OTTAWA1924.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
03OTTAWA1924 | 2003-07-09 13:01 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 OTTAWA 001924
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EB/ESC/ISC (MCMANUS AND DUDLEY), WHA/CAN
(RUNNING), OES/EGC (REIFSNYDER AND DEROSA)
USDOC FOR ITA/MAC -- OFFICE OF NAFTA
DOE FOR IA (A/S BAILEY, DAS DOBRIANSKY, PUMPHREY AND
DEUTSCH)
DEPT PASS USTR FOR MELLE AND CHANDLER
DEPT PASS INTERIOR FOR INT'L AFFAIRS
DEPT PASS FERC FOR KEVIN KELLY AND DONALD LEKANG
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG ETRD CA
SUBJECT: SCENE-SETTER FOR TRI- AND BILATERAL ENERGY MEETINGS
REF: (A) Ottawa 1812 (Uranium)
(B) Ottawa 1721 (Hydrogen Economy Partnership)
(C) Ottawa 1578 (NOAA Administrator's visit)
(D) Ottawa 687 (GOC climate change measures)
(E) Ottawa 566 (2002 energy trade data)
(F) Ottawa 503 (Natural gas in North America)
(G) Ottawa 334 (Protecting oil/gas pipelines)
(H) Halifax 52 (Atlantic offshore outlook)
(J) Calgary 44 (Alberta electric restructuring)
(K) 02 Vancouver 1153 (BC energy policy)
(L) 02 Calgary 473 (Alberta and Kyoto)
(M) 02 Ottawa 3205 (Atlantic offshore overview)
(N) 02 Ottawa 2474 (Power transmission barriers)
SUBJECT PARAS
CANADA ENERGY OVERVIEW 3 - 9
PARTNERSHIP FOR THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY 10
SHIFTING TO OILSANDS AND FRONTIERS 11 - 15
OILSANDS: CONTINUING EXPANSION 16 - 19
ARCTIC PIPELINES: APPROACHING REALITY 20 - 21
ELECTRICITY: ONTARIO RESTRUCTURING SKIDS 22 - 25
NUCLEAR: MOVING TOWARD LONG-TERM DISPOSAL 26
CLIMATE CHANGE 27 - 28
¶1. THIS MESSAGE IS SENSITIVE, BUT UNCLASSIFIED. NOT
FOR DISTRIBUTION OUTSIDE USG CHANNELS.
¶2. In preparation for the forthcoming meetings of the
North American Energy Working Group (NAEWG) and U.S.-
Canada Energy Consultative Mechanism (ECM) in Ottawa
July 15-17, post provides the following updated
overview of the very dynamic Canadian energy scene.
CANADIAN ENERGY OVERVIEW
------------------------
¶3. Since the early 1980's, Canada has been the single
largest foreign supplier of energy to the United
States; measured in total energy, it is our number one
energy supplier by a wide margin. Canada is the
world's fifth largest energy producer and a net
exporter of all major energy products including oil and
petroleum products, natural gas, electric power,
uranium, and energy technology and services. The
United States is virtually Canada's sole customer for
crude oil and natural gas exports, which grew steeply
over the past decade and a half, as well as its sole
customer for exports of electric power.
¶4. Canadian and U.S. government efforts are coordinated
across the full range of energy-related technologies
including climate monitoring, carbon sequestration,
clean coal, hydrogen and nuclear. Canada has been
invited to participate in the Carbon Sequestration
Leadership Forum (CSLF) and the International
Partnership for the Hydrogen Economy (IPHE).
¶5. OIL: Canada supplies more oil and oil products to
Americans than any other country, including Saudi
Arabia. In 2002 Canada exported approximately 1.4
million barrels per day of crude oil, plus the
equivalent of about 500,000 barrels per day in
petroleum products and partially processed oil. In
2002, imports of Canadian oil and petroleum products
accounted for about about 17 percent of U.S. oil
imports and nearly 10 percent of total U.S. oil demand.
¶6. GAS: Natural gas makes up the largest part - more
than one-third - of Canada's primary energy production.
In 2002 Canada exported 3.74 trillion cubic feet of
natural gas, making up 93 percent of U.S. gas imports
and 18 percent of total U.S. gas demand. (See ref F
for a Canadian perspective on North American gas supply
issues).
¶7. ELECTRIC POWER: Canada exported about 35 terawatt-
hours of electric power to the United States in 2002.
Canada's total electricity exports peaked in 2000 and
are now on a declining trend, due to changes in demand
patterns, a lack of capital investment in both the U.S.
and Canadian electric power industries and the
difficulty of building new transmission capacity (see
ref N for analysis).
¶8. NUCLEAR: Canada is the world's largest uranium
producer (ref A), supplying about one-third of world
production and 20 to 30 percent of U.S. demand. A
Canadian Government-owned firm, AECL, is one of the
world's most active vendors of nuclear reactors, having
supplied units to China and South Korea in the past
decade.
¶9. For further data on Canadian energy production and
trade, refer to the EIA's Country Analysis Brief on
Canada (www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/canada.html), or the
GOC's National Energy Board website (www.neb.gc.ca).
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶10. Canada has been invited to participate in the IPHE.
Working-level GOC officials appear to be cautiously
interested, but have significant concerns about how IPHE
will relate to the IEA's Hydrogen Coordination Group (ref
B). They also have numerous questions about IPHE's possible
structure and process.
SHIFTING TO OILSANDS AND FRONTIERS
----------------------------------
¶11. Canada's conventional oil and gas fields are mainly
located in or adjacent to the western province of
Alberta, which is north of Montana. While the cost of
finding new reserves in this region has risen
significantly in recent years, the industry continues
to thrive, notably in the less-exploited northwestern
portion of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin which
extends into the neighboring province of British
Columbia. A relatively new energy/mining technology,
the extraction of oil from oilsands (vast deposits of
oily dirt) in northern Alberta, became profitable
during the 1990's. Multi-billion-dollar investments
are ongoing in that industry. See paragraphs 16-19
below for details.
¶12. The ability of supplies to keep up with North
America's natural gas demand has been the subject of
recent controversy in Canada, as it has in the United
States. There is now broad, well-developed support
among stakeholders to construct a pipeline down the
Mackenzie River Valley, which would allow development
of natural gas fields in the Mackenzie River Delta and
Beaufort Sea areas (east of Alaska's North Slope). The
first formal steps toward applying for regulatory
approval for such a pipeline are expected to be taken
in the second half of 2003. While the amount of gas
which will be accessed by this pipeline is a fraction
as large as that in Prudhoe Bay, the barriers to
pipeline development are lower, and the gas could begin
to reach southern markets around 2010.
¶13. Substantial oil and gas deposits under the
continental shelf off Canada's Atlantic coast entered
commercial production in the past decade, highlighted
by the placement of a large fixed platform on the
"Hibernia" oilfield (east of Newfoundland) in 1997, and
the inauguration of natural gas exports from Nova
Scotia to New England through the Maritimes and
Northeast Pipeline early in 2000.
¶14. The Hibernia oilfield, which is being exploited by
a consortium of private oil firms (Exxon/Mobil is the
operator), is estimated to contain more than 600
million barrels of oil. Major oil firms are now
beginning production from the nearby "Terra Nova"
oilfield, which has reserves of about 300-400 million
barrels. Conservative estimates put East Coast
discovered reserves of oil in the two billion barrels
range, with possible eventual production rates of up to
one million barrels per day.
¶15. Offshore natural gas production from the Sable
Island area, east of Nova Scotia, began early in 2000.
Most of this gas is exported to New England - bringing
large-scale natural gas service to these states for the
first time, and helping to stabilize their winter
heating costs. Gas reserves around Sable Island have
been estimated at 3.5 trillion cubic feet, but more
drilling is needed to complete this picture (ref H).
There are much larger gas resources in Newfoundland and
Labrador, but environmental and distance problems will
slow these developments.
OILSANDS: CONTINUING EXPANSION
-------------------------------
¶16. The economically recoverable oil resources in
Alberta's oilsands are many times larger than the sum
of Canada's other oil reserves. Oilsands (aka
"tarsands" or "heavy oil") are vast deposits of oily
dirt which can be processed (economically at current
oil prices) into "synthetic crude" which can then be
refined in conventional oil refineries. Canadian
authorities estimate reserves in the oilsands to be the
equivalent of 175 billion barrels assuming current
technology and economic conditions, and up to 315
billion barrels with technological advances and some
price increases. Oilsands already account for more
than half of Canada's crude oil output, and for most of
the recent increases in Canada's production.
¶17. Crude bitumen production from oilsands increased by
about 25 percent in 2002, due to large ongoing capital
investments. The Canadian government has predicted
that if currently planned projects are realized, by
2010 Canada will provide approximately 20.5 percent of
U.S. oil imports and 14.1 percent of total U.S. oil
supply. The Alberta Energy and Utilities Board
projects that synthetic crude oil production from
Alberta's oilsands will expand by 237 percent from 2002
to 2012.
¶18. During the past year, first Oil and Gas Journal and
subsequently the U.S. Energy Information Administration
began to recognize Canada's oil sands as "proven
reserves" -- a decision which dramatically increases
Canada's petroleum reserves on paper, to about 180
billion barrels, making Canada the world's second-
largest reserve holder after Saudi Arabia. While the
validity of counting the oilsands as "proven reserves"
has been subject to some ongoing controversy (notably
following a critical item by Jeff Gerth in the New York
Times on June 18), their economic reality is affirmed
by the many billions in actual capital investment which
they are attracting and the resulting current increases
in oil output.
¶19. COMMENT: There is growing confidence among
Canadian stakeholders and analysts that this resource
imposes an effective limit on the price which North
America must pay for overseas oil in the long run,
absent severe foreign supply disruptions. Embassy
shares this view. END COMMENT.
ARCTIC PIPELINES: MACKENZIE LINE CLOSER TO REALITY
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶20. IN RECENT MONTHS, STAKEHOLDERS IN AN ANTICIPATED NATURAL
GAS PIPELINE DOWN THE MACKENZIE RIVER VALLEY IN NORTHWESTERN
CANADA HAVE TAKEN FURTHER STEPS TO PAVE THE ROAD FOR A
FORMAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. TRANSCANADA PIPELINES (TCPL),
ONE OF THE WORLD'S LARGEST PIPELINE OPERATORS, SIGNED A DEAL
IN JUNE TO PROVIDE FINANCING TO ABORIGINAL PIPELINE GROUP
(APG), ENABLING APG TO TAKE A ONE-THIRD OWNERSHIP SHARE IN
THE PIPELINE. THE MAIN PRODUCING PARTNER IS IMPERIAL OIL,
THE CANADIAN SUBSIDIARY OF EXXON. AN INITIAL APPLICATION TO
REGULATORS IS EXPECTED IN THE FALL OF 2003.
¶21. STAKEHOLDERS LESS AND LESS VIEW THE MACKENZIE LINE AND
ANOTHER, LARGER PIPELINE TO ALASKA'S PRUDHOE BAY AS BEING
INCOMPATIBLE. THIS IS BECAUSE IT APPEARS INCREASINGLY
LIKELY THAT THE SMALLER AND SHORTER MACKENZIE LINE WILL BE
CONSTRUCTED FIRST, AND BECAUSE THERE IS INCREASING CONCERN
THAT NORTH AMERICA'S DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS MAY OUTSTRIP
SUPPLIES OVER THE COMING DECADE (REF F). CANADIAN
OBJECTIONS TO POSSIBLE FISCAL INCENTIVES TO SUPPORT THE
ALASKA PIPELINE FOCUS ON THE POSSIBLE MARKET-DISTORTING
EFFECTS OF SUCH SUBSIDIES - PARTICULARLY IF THEY GO BEYOND
THE SCOPE OF MEASURES TAKEN TO ENCOURAGE INVESTMENT IN OTHER
GAS PRODUCING REGIONS.
ELECTRICITY: RESTRUCTURING SKIDS IN ONTARIO
--------------------------------------------
¶22. Electric power is primarily under provincial
jurisdiction in Canada, and is traditionally dominated by
provincial government-owned firms. Several provinces have
taken steps to restructure their electricity sectors on
competitive principles. Alberta has achieved a degree of
competition at both wholesale and retail levels which has
been characterized as a "messy success" (ref J).
¶23. In Ontario in recent years, the provincial monopoly
utility was split up into generation, transmission and
distribution components, and some competition was introduced
at the retail level. However, in April 2002 a planned
initial public offering of the provincial government-owned
transmission grid operator, Hydro One, was blocked by a
court ruling. Transmission grid issues quickly became
politicized, particularly when power prices rose during the
peak summer period. In November 2002, the Ontario
government froze retail power rates at 4.3 cents/KWH for
most customers until 2006. Since then, the government has
struggled to increase generating capacity with little help
from private investment. Re-starting mothballed nuclear
plants is crucial to its survival strategy, but the first re-
starts - expected this summer and fall - have been delayed.
¶24. Canada's National Energy Board (NEB) predicts that
domestic electricity demand will grow slightly faster than
supply through 2025, causing electricity exports to the
United States to decline significantly from current levels
in the long run. This is driven by the trend for generating
facilities to be located closer to end users. One major
reason for this is the difficulty of constructing new
transmission capacity due to a range of concerns including
environmental/agricultural opposition, regulatory hurdles,
and uncertainty associated with the evolving market
environment for electric power. Another is the growing
availability of natural gas and the efficiency of gas-driven
generating technology.
¶25. Canada still has abundant undeveloped hydroelectric
potential, but these resources tend to be located far from
densely populated markets. Provinces with large undeveloped
sites include Newfoundland and Labrador (Churchill Falls
II), Quebec (Great Whale) and Manitoba (Nelson River).
There is significant potential for cogeneration of electric
power in oilsands operations, but here as well, it will be
difficult for the resulting power to reach major markets
unless construction of long-distance power lines becomes
easier.
NUCLEAR: MOVING FORWARD ON LONG-TERM DISPOSAL
--------------------------------------------- -
¶26. Like the United States, Canada has no permanent disposal
facility for its nuclear waste, which is currently stored at
reactor sites. As in the U.S., proposals to move this waste
to any other site(s) provoke strong local resistance.
During 2002, Canada passed legislation which creates a Waste
Management Organization, funded by nuclear energy firms, to
develop a long-term approach to storing radioactive waste.
The GOC plans to make a decision by 2006 in favor of one of
the three major options (deep geological storage,
centralized surface/subsurface, or continued storage at
reactor sites).
CLIMATE CHANGE
--------------
¶27. In the spring of 2002 the USG and GOC announced a more
concerted effort to coordinate our climate change programs,
with a particular focus on energy, especially energy
efficiency, clean energy, clean coal, renewable and
alternative energy and carbon sequestration. At Prime
Minister Chretien's initiative, Canada formally ratified the
Kyoto Accord at the end of 2002, despite vocal criticism
from provincial governments and industries (with Alberta and
the oil and gas sector leading the way - ref L). Critics
were concerned that the burden of compliance would fall
disproportionately on certain regions/industries and also
that compliance would place Canada's economy at a lasting
competitive disadvantage vis--vis the United States.
¶28. In its spring 2003 budget, the GOC committed C$1.5
billion (about US$1 billion) over five years directly to
achieving greenhouse gas emission reductions, plus modest
additional funds for research and long-term technology
development. GOC officials are now engaged in determining
what process will be used to allocate this spending.
CELLUCCI