

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SANJOSE593, COSTA RICA - AUSTR VISIT CLEARLY LAYS OUT REMAINING CAFTA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SANJOSE593.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08SANJOSE593 | 2008-07-11 22:10 | 2011-03-02 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
Appears in these articles: http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-02/Investigacion.aspx |
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0593/01 1932225
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 112225Z JUL 08
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9931
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000593
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA, WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC AND EEB; PLEASE PASS TO
USTR:AMALITO/DOLIVER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR PGOV PREL CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA - AUSTR VISIT CLEARLY LAYS OUT REMAINING CAFTA
IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
REFS: A) SAN JOSE 541
B) SAN JOSE 508
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (SBU) Visiting Costa Rica June 24-26 at GOCR request, AUSTR
Everett Eissenstat told GOCR officials that legislative solutions
are required to resolve the state guarantee (insurance) and
biodiversity issues. GOCR officials, including President Arias,
made equally clear that new legislation at this late date in the
implementation process would be, in their view, politically
impossible, although the GOCR is willing to explore creative
non-legislative solutions. In frank but friendly discussions, both
sides agreed to set the insurance issue aside for now, and made
progress on biodiversity. Tanuja Garde (USTR Director of
Intellectual Property) and George York (USTR General Counsel's
Office) accompanied AUSTR.
¶2. (U) The GOCR remains optimistic that all legislation will be
completed by August-September, and hopeful that USTR will not
continue to insist on a legislative remedy for the insurance issue.
If a new bill is absolutely required, the GOCR needs to know ASAP.
Since the AUSTR visit, the existing insurance law and the revised
IPR enforcement bill were approved in second reading, becoming the
ninth and tenth CAFTA bills to be completed by the legislature. At
this point, only three bills remain. SEE ACTION REQUEST, Para 16.
END SUMMARY.
-------------
TIGHT AGENDA
-------------
¶3. (U) Repeated airline delays complicated the visit, which was
originally scheduled for June 23-25. A reception at the
Ambassador's residence on June 24, which had been meant to be the
culmination of a long day of political meetings, instead became the
first formal event. June 25 was devoted to political meetings in
the morning with GOCR officials and key pro-CAFTA legislators,
followed by technical meetings and a session with the private sector
in the afternoon. Events on June 26 were limited to an IPR
technical meeting and a final wrap-up with Minister of Foreign Trade
(COMEX) Marco Vinicio Ruiz and his team.
---------------
FIRST, OPTIMISM
---------------
¶4. (SBU) The primary purposes of the AUSTR visit were 1) to help
motivate legislators and members of the executive branch to conclude
the necessary CAFTA-DR implementation legislation on time and 2) to
advance IPR technical discussions. The GOCR had requested the
visit, believing the time was ripe to push the pro-CAFTA G-38
coalition to complete remaining legislation. NOTE: We had prepared
for a similar session with legislators during AUSTR's April visit
(Ref B), but the GOCR demurred, arguing that the timing was too
sensitive then to meet face-to-face with legislators with May 1
leadership elections looming.
¶5. (SBU) GOCR Ambassador Duenas, visiting from Washington, sketched
an optimistic pre-visit picture for Ambassador Cianchette on June
¶24. He had just come from a meeting with key pro-CAFTA legislators
and senior GOCR officials. AUSTR's delayed arrival, in fact, had
given the Costa Rican side time for this important preparatory
session. Visibly elated, Duenas described an executive-legislature
team at last ready to complete CAFTA. Although the G-38 coalition
was tired and "paper-thin," the members recognized that work needed
to be done on a few outstanding issues (insurance, IPR and
biodiversity) and were prepared to consider "creative" solutions.
Duenas hoped both the USG and GOCR sides would have "open minds."
-------------------------------
THEN, A POLITICAL REALITY CHECK
-------------------------------
¶6. (SBU) The opening session on June 25, hosted at the Presidential
office building, at first seemed to confirm Duenas' optimism.
Minister of the Presidency Rodrigo Arias, COMEX Minister Ruiz,
Legislature President Francisco Pacheco (PLN), PLN Faction Chief
Oscar Nunez, PUSC Faction Chief Lorena Vasquez and leading PLN
legislators Mayi Antillon (International Relations Committee Chair)
and Maureen Ballesteros (Environmental Committee Chair) all
reiterated their willingness and flexibility to resolve the
remaining insurance (state guarantee), biodiversity and
pharmaceutical issues using existing legislation, regulations, side
letters or executive decrees - anything but new legislation.
Recounting the "unique" Costa Rican political environment, all
recounted the CAFTA difficulties and "historic" progress to date,
but evinced optimism that the remaining implementation legislation
would be done by September. Vasquez and Ballesteros, in particular,
warned of changes that might affect Costa Rica's existing
biodiversity law, which had been a sensitive issue during and since
the CAFTA referendum in October.
¶7. (SBU) All ruled out new legislation as politically impossible,
citing the still active CAFTA opposition and the frayed, tired G38
coalition. There was stunned silence, therefore, when AUSTR
stressed, as the USG had consistently made clear in discussions with
COMEX, that legislative solutions were required for the remaining
issues, or USTR may not be able to certify Costa Rica for CAFTA
entry into force.
---------------------
THE VIEW FROM THE TOP
---------------------
¶8. (SBU) Underscoring the GOCR's concerns, President Oscar Arias
then made a brief (surprise) appearance to appeal for USG
flexibility. Arias stressed that the U.S. "had no better friend"
than Costa Rica, a "consolidated democracy" which shared U.S. values
and which was fighting for democracy in the region. Citing the just
concluded Six-Party Agreement with the DPRK, Arias asked "if the USG
can be flexible with its enemies," why not even more so with its
"friends"? Arias added that he had gambled all his political
capital on CAFTA, and the Costa Rican people wouldn't understand if
after all this effort Costa Rica were left out because of "very
little things that frankly aren't worth the trouble." Arias said he
could not go to the legislature for a new bill (i.e., to resolve the
insurance issue), and concluded, "It would be a very big blow to
Costa Rica to be left out (of CAFTA)".
----------------------------
MORE VIEWS FROM THE COALITION
----------------------------
¶9. (SBU) A follow-on meeting was intended to focus on the
problematic Libertarian Party (whose legislators did not attend), as
well as helpful independents. Participants in that session
underscored the fragility of the pro-CAFTA coalition and the
political impossibility of completing new legislation in time for an
October 1 EIF. AUSTR Eissenstat responded that it was precisely
because the GOCR had come so far "in this marathon" that it should
not give up with "one last hill to climb." Eissenstat also
described the more complex political environment in Washington,
given the pending FTAs with Colombia and Panama. He explained that
USTR therefore had to handle CAFTA very carefully and correctly; the
discussion is not just about Costa Rica's EIF, but about "the entire
USG trade agenda." As discussion continued, independent Evita
Arguedes (ex-Libertarian) posed a hypothetical question: Would the
USG consider a limited, focused EIF extension to accommodate
resolution of 1-2 final issues (such as completion of a new
insurance bill)?
¶10. (U) Other Costa Rica participants in the June 25 morning
meetings included legislator Jose Manuel Echandi (IND), Ambassador
Duenas, VM of the Presidency Roberto Thompson, GOCR advisors Carlos
Arguedas (a former Supreme Court magistrate) and Allan Thompson, and
COMEX staff Fernando Ocampo, Suzanna Vazquez, Jose Carlos Quirce
(from the Embassy in Washington) and Gabriella Castro (COMEX). U.S.
Embassy participants included Ambassador Cianchette, ADCM Henifin
and Kevin Ludeke and Hellen Sanou (Pol/Econ Section staff).
--------------------------------
THE VIEW FROM THE PRIVATE SECTOR
--------------------------------
¶11. (SBU) In an afternoon session with the private sector, Michael
Borg, President of AmCham, and other business leaders pressed AUSTR
on the urgency and importance of finding a non-legislative solution
to the insurance issue. Borg and others argued that introducing
any new legislation at this time would revitalize the CAFTA
opposition, who would portray even a technical correction limiting
the state guarantee on insurance as "American interests plundering
Costa Rica while the GOCR stands by." With some hyperbole, Borg
predicted that an invigorated opposition would then not only be able
to block CAFTA, but perhaps to ensure PAC leader Otton Solis'
election as president in 2010. AUSTR Eissenstat reiterated USG
political and legal constraints, and suggested that the private
sector continue to work with the GOCR, COMEX and the legislature to
complete the implementing legislation and regulations.
--------------------------------------------- ------
TECHNICAL DISCUSSIONS MAKE PROGRESS ON BIODIVERSITY
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶12. (SBU) Throughout the meetings with the USTR team, GOCR officials
and legislators maintained that domestic political sensitivities on
environmental and biodiversity issues made changes to Costa Rica's
Biodiversity Law political dynamite. The COMEX team was thus under
instruction to press for non-legislative solutions to make the
Biodiversity Law CAFTA-compliant. The technical teams made
progress, but a combination of legislative fixes (in the catch-all
IPR bill under discussion in the legislature) and regulations will
be required. (Note: other IP aspects of CAFTA were understood by
Tanuja Garde to have been resolved, and were only briefly mentioned
during the summary sessions.)
¶13. (SBU) The following is a summary of the technical-level
discussion on how to make the Biodiversity Law CAFTA-compliant:
-- Article 7: USTR believes that the definition of a micro organism
raises doubt concerning the non-patentability of plants and tissues.
USTR thus asked to re-define microorganisms. The GOCR believes
such a redefinition is not CAFTA language and shouldn't be required
by USTR. The GOCR team (Suzanna Vazquez and Fernando Ocampo) agreed
to accept a clarification via regulation but not in the law.
-- Article 78: Very clearly states that IP protection won't be
extended to certain things [non-genetically-modified organisms and
plants are notably on the list]. The law therefore must be changed
to eliminate those exceptions. COMEX agreed.
-- Article 80: Gives effective veto power over IP applications to
the Technical Commission formed under the Biodiversity Law. This is
unacceptable to USTR. USTR proposed that the Biodiversity Law
requirements run on a separate track from IP protection, with weekly
or daily fines levied on companies that obtain patent protection
without having completed the Biodiversity Law requirements. COMEX
had argued earlier that such a fine would be criticized for "putting
a price on biodiversity," but appears to have agreed with the basic
concept.
-- Article 81: Gives the GOCR the power to require obligatory IP
licenses in the case of a declared national emergency "without the
need to pay". USTR insists that this provision cannot stand. COMEX
agrees.
CONCLUSIONS: Articles 78 and 81 of the Biodiversity Law will be
modified by law. Articles 7 and 80 will probably be modified by
regulation (otherwise by law).
---------------------------------------------
REGULATIONS MOVING IN PARALLEL TO LEGISLATION
---------------------------------------------
¶14. (SBU) In a separate meeting with AUSTR (chaired by Minister
Ruiz), GOCR officials reported that CAFTA regulations were moving in
parallel to the remaining legislation, to speed the implementation
process. Their goal was to go final with regulations as soon as the
relevant laws were completed. Representatives from ARESEP and
CONASSIF (GOCR regulatory bodies) described the internal/public
review and gazetting process, and predicted that telecom and
insurance regulations should be completed by August. According to
COMEX officials, SPS and other regulations would be complete "in the
next few weeks." Eissenstat urged the GOCR to share the text of the
draft regulations before they went to public review. He also
reminded the GOCR officials that a special IPR prosecution unit
needed to be established before CAFTA EIF, as agreed to in earlier
discussions on IPR penalties.
---------------------
OFFICIALS OPTIMISTIC
---------------------
¶15. (SBU) GOCR officials have been optimistic, even buoyant, in the
wake of CAFTA progress following AUSTR's visit. The existing
insurance law was approved in second reading on July 1, and the
revised IPR enforcement bill on July 7. These two become the ninth
and tenth CAFTA bills completed by the legislature (of thirteen).
Of the three remaining, the telecommunications bill is due back from
the Constitutional Court in mid-month, and could be approved by the
end of July, assuming the Court finds no problems. The catch-all
IPR bill ("No. 12") is due out of committee in mid-month, and should
be approved in first vote in August. The GOCR hopes the amendments
bill, already out of committee, will be approved in first vote by
the end of July. Both of those bills are likely to require
Constitutional Court review before becoming law.
----------------------------------------
COMMENT: AN ESSENTIAL, WELL-TIMED VISIT
----------------------------------------
¶16. (SBU) Although it took a while to gel, the timing was right for
this visit. Both sides came away with a very clear picture of the
others' interests and limitations. The need for a legislative fix
on insurance should not have been such a shock to the GOCR; the USG
side has been explicitly pressing for this since January. Despite
the clarity of AUSTR's message, the GOCR side still appears to be
hoping that a new insurance law will not/not be required. Minister
Ruiz plans to be in Geneva July 19 and is willing to discuss the
issue further there with USTR Schwab, if necessary. If a new
insurance law is absolutely required, the GOCR needs to know ASAP.
Also, the media and the GOCR are assuming that Costa Rica has until
September 30 to complete the CAFTA legislation. ACTION REQUEST: To
debunk this myth, please advise the realistic deadline to complete
the legislation.
¶17. (U) This cable was cleared by AUSTR Eissenstat.