

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08WELLINGTON105, POLITICAL OBJECTIVITY OF NZ MEDIA QUESTIONED
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08WELLINGTON105.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08WELLINGTON105 | 2008-03-19 23:11 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO9779
RR RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0105/01 0792329
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 192329Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5153
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1640
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5146
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0654
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000105
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM NZ
SUBJECT: POLITICAL OBJECTIVITY OF NZ MEDIA QUESTIONED
WELLINGTON 00000105 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) Summary. The Labour Government's relationship with the
New Zealand media has become increasingly tense and prompted Prime
Minister Clark to call into question its behaviour and political
objectivity. At the same time, opposition National Party leader
John Key has received lighter press criticism, with Labour's dive in
the February polls given front-page headlines and endless op-ed
commentary suggesting the 2008 election is already over and Key has
won. Political analysts (and some media) admit that Labour simply
produces more grist for media comment than the opposition or minor
parties. Once National begins to unveil more policy and a sense of
how it will govern if elected, the media will provide greater
scrutiny and any perceived notion of uneven media attention will
dissipate. End Summary.
NZ Media Objectivity Called into Question
-----------------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) Since the start of 2008 election year, the Labour
Government and Prime Minister Clark have been regularly subjected to
intense analysis and criticism by New Zealand's media. Conversely,
the opposition National Party and its leader John Key have had far
less scrutiny during this period. In response, the Government has
lashed out repeatedly at the press, characterising the media as less
than well-informed and calling into question journalists'
objectivity. One of the country's most seasoned and well-respected
journalists, Richard Harman, dismissed suggestions of media bias and
offered that this was "par for the course." He noted that in the
run-up to every election since the early 1970s he has been accused
of bias by both major parties.
Fissure in the Labour-Press Relationship
----------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) Since coming to power in 1999, Labour's relationship with
the press has been reasonably good. However, in 2007 two pivotal
events signalled that the character of this relationship was headed
for a downturn. The first was the introduction of the highly
contentious Electoral Finance Bill legislation, which sought to cap
political campaign spending by an individual or organisation. The
Bill sparked uniform, and often acerbic, press criticism of Clark
and her Government; the media argued it was an abuse of power which
unfairly restricted free speech. Leading the charge was The New
Zealand Herald, the country's most widely read newspaper, which
launched a visceral front-page campaign against Labour for
introducing the Bill. Even though the Bill became law on December
19, 2007, the Herald's campaign continues unabated. The Herald
publishes a monthly 'name and shame' graphic of the Labour MPs who
voted for the Bill.
¶4. (SBU) The second event was a speech Clark gave shortly before
the Electoral Finance legislation became law. Embattled by the
steady diet of press condemnation about the Bill, Clark questioned
the quality and judgment of New Zealand journalism. She asserted
that Kiwi journalists lack general knowledge and are too young to
remember seminal events in New Zealand's history. Citing the
Herald's anti-Electoral Finance bill campaign as an example, Clark
questioned whether journalists are upholding their professional
duties to be truthful, fair and balanced. The Herald was not alone
at the receiving end of Clark's wrath. She also singled out New
Zealand's second largest newspaper, The Dominion Post and the
Political Editor for TV3 News for criticism.
Clark Detects Right-Wing Bias in Some Publications
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶5. (SBU) In addition to questioning the professionalism of some
journalists, Clark also suggested that Labour's difficulty in
attracting positive press reviews in recent times was the result of
an ideological bias against Labour. She believes that The New
Zealand Herald, in particular, lacks objectivity and has a long-held
political prejudice against Labour. On February 27, Clark accused
The Herald of running "a silly campaign" against the Electoral
Finance legislation and added that "it was a Tory paper which has
shown no charity to Labour in the party's 91 years of existence."
The paper rejected claims that its campaign is ideologically driven
and maintained that it is simply fulfilling its role in questioning
authority and meeting its obligation to guard against the outright
abuse of power and constrictions against the freedom of speak.
¶6. (SBU) Clark's assertion of right-wing bias was not limited to
the mainstream publications. In the March edition of the New
Zealand Law Journal, its editor questioned whether free and fair
elections could be held under new election funding rules. The
editor also characterized present conditions in New Zealand under
the new funding rules as "Putinesque." Clark responded by saying
WELLINGTON 00000105 002.2 OF 003
that such comments came as no surprise, given the editor was "at the
opposite end of the political spectrum" from her. (Comment: Clark's
remark is accurate regarding Law Journal editor Bernard Robertson.
End Comment)
Liberal Media Also Critical of Clark
------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Clark's assessment that competing ideology is behind some
of the media's lack of enthusiasm towards her and Labour can,
however, be challenged by the recent writings of Chris Trotter, New
Zealand's most identifiable left-wing political commentator. Over
the past month, Trotter has been sharply critical of Clark's ability
to lead her party to victory in this year's election. In light of
successive polls showing Labour well behind National in the party
vote and Clark consistently coming in second to Key in preferred PM
polling, Trotter has argued that Labour's only hope of winning the
election is for Defence Minister Phil Goff to replace Clark as party
leader. Another openly left-friendly writer, Matt MacCarten, has
also been as critical of Labour and Clark in recent columns.
Journalist: Boredom Causing Uneven Media interest
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶8. (SBU) An Australian journalist who once reported on NZ politics
for a major Australian newspaper and who also worked for The New
Zealand Herald does believe that there exists an uneven balance of
critical attention towards Clark and her Government at the expense
of Key and his National Party. But according to Australian
journalist Claire Harvey, this bias is not based on ideology. In a
radio interview on March 9, Harvey opined that any bias against
Clark and Labour is largely based on the NZ media's fondness for
political novelty, with John Key representing a fresh face.
Additionally, Harvey posits that NZ reporters implicitly yearn for a
change in political management because they do not want to spend the
next three years continuing to report of yet another Labour
government consisting of many of the some personalities from
previous years. She believes that the NZ press are simply bored
with Clark and Labour and claimed that "everything that needs to be
written about this Labour Government has already been written."
Clark Finds Disfavor, Key Gets a Waiver
---------------------------------------
¶9. (SBU) Whereas the media appear to be relishing the problems
facing Clark and Labour, with front-page banner headlines trumpeting
its recent poor poll results, they seem to be savoring Key and his
party's ascendancy in the polls. Notably, two of New Zealand most
distinguished political commentators have all but anointed Key as
the election victor. In his recent columns, The Herald's John
Armstrong has referenced Key as the "Prime Minister-in-waiting."
His Herald stable mate Colin James, normally seen to be relatively
Labour-friendly, has been found to using "when" when talking about
Key as Prime Minister, not "if." Moreover, in an address to the New
Zealand Institute of International Affairs on March 11, James
forecast that "Clark will likely give way to Key" at this year's
general election. When asked by post to comment on perceived
notions of media bias, James rejected the suggestion that he writes
from one particular ideological perspective.
¶10. (SBU) Key has not been completely free from critical media
scrutiny in recent times. In the week of March 3, Key received
media criticism for a succession of gaffes he made relating to his
misinterpretations of his party's policy and a lack of clarity on
the issue of state asset sales. Some of this criticism from
columnists, however, resembled advice rather than censure. Tracey
Watkins of The Dominion Post, for example, appeared to warn Key that
if he does not lift his game he would wear Labour's "slippery John"
label. Journalists have told Post's Media Specialist that they are
becoming very frustrated with National's lack of stated policy and
its unwillingness to take positions on issues of public interest.
They have noted that Key sometimes has reacted angrily to their
desire to pin down his position on issues and they have wondered
aloud how he will stand up to the rigour of an election campaign.
The NZ Media's Political Influence
----------------------------------
¶11. (SBU) The degree to which mainstream media in New Zealand
influence voting patterns is not fully defined. There is little
capacity for editors and publishers to become political kingmakers
nor is there great receptivity among the New Zealand public. Unlike
in the United States, it is not customary for the mainstream media
to explicitly endorse a candidate for political office. Moreover,
the tighter controls on publishing political opinion, as a result of
WELLINGTON 00000105 003.2 OF 003
the new campaign funding rules, give the press little leeway to take
a biased position. There does exist in New Zealand authentic
political bias in the country's blogosphere, where some of New
Zealand's main political pundits have their own blogs where they
voice a more jaundiced perspective in contrast to their mainstream
media reporting. However, the ability of the Internet to influence
the political landscape is limited because in New Zealand its viral
reach falls far behind that of the mainstream media.
Comment
-------
¶12. (SBU) Clark is no different from most politicians who are
predisposed to blame their political woes on the press.
Nonetheless, her criticism that the media are pacing public opinion
rather that simply reporting it has some validity and has raised
questions from more neutral observers. However, Clark's hypothesis
that the lack of positive stories on Labour and herself is
ideologically motivated is excessive. The media's true bias is
often conflict and political drama, which is most compelling to the
general public - and Labour has provided a series of bad news
stories since late last year that make for good copy and sell
papers. One of Key's advisors also discounts that National is
getting a free ride and has told us that the media can be just as
vicious with National; he anticipates the press will be just as
tough on a National Government, should it win, as they are with
Labour. End Comment.
McCormick