

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06TORONTO1144, SOFTWOOD LUMBER: ONTARIO'S STAND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06TORONTO1144.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06TORONTO1144 | 2006-04-07 10:10 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Consulate Toronto |
VZCZCXRO6373
PP RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHON #1144/01 0971055
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 071055Z APR 06
FM AMCONSUL TORONTO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9841
INFO RUCNCAN/ALCAN COLLECTIVE
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 TORONTO 001144
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE; SIPDIS
PASS USTR FOR MELLE, MENDENHALL, CHANDLER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD PGOV CA
SUBJECT: SOFTWOOD LUMBER: ONTARIO'S STAND
REF: (A) OTTAWA 311 (B) VANCOUVER 358 (C) OTTAWA 172 (D) 05
TORONTO 1716 (E) TORONTO 1126
Sensitive But Unclassified -- protect accordingly.
¶1. (SBU) Summary: While major Canadian softwood industry
officials are pushing the Harper government to return to the
negotiating table, Ontario forestry association
representatives are concerned that a negotiated settlement
will prove elusive. At the same time, the Ontario
government struggles to keep its softwood lumber industry
alive. Despite past (and likely future) job losses and mill
closures, the industry will survive in Ontario. End
Summary.
¶2. (SBU) Canadian softwood lumber firms are small and have
a narrow profit margin by global standards. Canadian
exporters, feeling the effects of growing competition from
new exporting countries, are anxious for Canada to resolve
the softwood lumber trade dispute with the United States.
Meanwhile, associations representing the Ontario softwood
lumber industry expressed concern to us about the difficulty
of achieving a lasting settlement, despite their sincere
desire to put the dispute behind them.
Challenges to Negotiations
--------------------------
¶3. (SBU) Ontario officials tell us that the difficulty of a
settlement is two-pronged. First, natural resources,
including softwood lumber, are under the jurisdiction of the
provinces, making it impossible for the federal government
to unilaterally dictate softwood lumber policy. On a
positive note, as reported in ref (A), British Columbia (BC)
Premier Campbell, Ontario Premier McGuinty, and Quebec
Premier Charest have consulted one another and jointly
approached the federal government about the elements of an
acceptable agreement. Ontario forestry association reps
highlighted the other difficulty in reaching a timely
settlement -- they firmly believe Canadian industry should
hold out to receive all of the cash deposits being held by
the U.S. under the "Byrd Amendment" per recent WTO and NAFTA
rulings. The association reps suggested that some of the
money collected should be put aside to create a North
American softwood lumber marketing board to build a stronger
North American softwood lumber market in the global economy.
Ontario Forestry Sector as Compared to other Provinces
--------------------------------------------- ---------
¶4. (SBU) Ontario is Canada's second largest producer of
softwood lumber, after British Columbia. It is second to
the Province of Quebec in pulp and paper production.
Ontario trees are considered small in comparison to those of
other provinces, especially BC; the growing season is also
shorter in Ontario than in BC. These small Ontario trees
have to be moved long distances from the north to markets in
the south via ground transportation. Ontario cannot compete
with BC's cheap wood, which is filling the market as a
result of Ontario's infestation by Mountain Pine Beetles.
BC mills are much larger than Ontario mills, benefiting from
economies of scale, and distances to market are much shorter
than in Ontario.
Ontario: We Aim to Assist, Not Subsidize Forestry Producers
--------------------------------------------- --------------
¶5. (U) Ontario's forest-products industry employs some
30,000 people directly and an estimated 200,000 people
indirectly, and has annual sales (including exports) of
around C$27 billion. In many parts of Northern Ontario,
forestry is the only economic engine; representing 75% to
85% of the tax base. In recent years, forest products have
been Ontario's second largest contributor to the provincial
balance of trade after the auto sector, according to the
Ministry of Natural Resources' (MNR) Advisory Council on
Forest Sector Competitiveness 2005 report. More than 4,000
Ontario forest industry jobs have been lost in the last year
due to mill closings, in a continuing downward spiral of job
losses over the years. The government has been seeking ways
to help the industry overcome the challenges of the recently
strengthened Canadian dollar, the emergence of lower-cost
offshore softwood producers and skyrocketing Ontario
electricity costs.
¶6. (U) As with other OECD countries, Canada's (including
Ontario) stated policy has generally moved away from adding
production capacity toward more broad-based strategic
practices such as assisting research and development.
TORONTO 00001144 002 OF 003
¶7. (U) In the Ontario Government 2006 Budget, delivered on
March 23 (ref (E)), provincial Finance Minister Duncan
announced that, in addition to the federal government's
November 2005 offer of a C$1.5 billion, five-year national
program to help forest companies, workers and communities,
the Ontario Government will offer its own aid package. This
package consists of C$350 million in loan guarantees to
stimulate new investment in plant and equipment; C$150
million in grants to encourage power co-generation, energy
conservation and more value-added wood products; C$28
million annually to help fund forest access roads; C$10
million annually to fund enhanced forest resource
inventories; C$5 million over five years to promote new and
innovative wood products; and would streamline forestry-
related regulations and approval processes. In addition to
these initiatives, the Ontario Government recently announced
increased funding for forest access roads from C$28 million
to C$75 million per year; a one-time C$70 million refund in
stumpage charges; and a three-year C$3 million annual
reduction in stumpage charges for white birch and veneer-
grade poplar. In addition, the Ontario Government is
proposing to parallel federal tax measures to support co-
generation.
¶8. (SBU) Electricity costs are higher in Ontario than
almost any other jurisdiction in North America. In response
to this, the Ontario Government announced a three-year
extension to a proposed revenue limit on a portion of
Ontario Power Generation (OPG)'s assets to help stabilize
electricity costs across all industries in Ontario;
electricity costs have been blamed for recent mill closures
in Ontario's forestry sector (Note: OPG is owned 100% by the
Province of Ontario, and produced 70% of Ontario's
electricity in 2005. End Note).
What These Announcements Mean
-----------------------------
¶9. (SBU) The Ontario lumber mills that have avoided closure
are highly leveraged and, without provincial loan
guarantees, face great difficulty in acquiring financing
from banks for needed capital investments. The loan
guarantees, as well as the other government offerings,
above, were recommendations in the MNR's Advisory Council on
Forest Sector Competitiveness 2005 report (which contained
twenty six recommendations, and have all been implemented by
the Ontario Government). The Advisory Council on Forest
Sector Competitiveness was led by Don Roberts, a leading
forestry analyst from CIBC World Markets (ref (D)).
¶10. (SBU) The C$350 million in loan guarantees and C$150
million in grants aim to create more energy independence in
the industry by promoting energy conservation and co-
generation from biomass (using black liquor), a process used
widely in Europe. This approach should lessen industry
dependence on coal-generated electricity, and enable better
use of wood fiber through better pulping techniques.
¶11. (U) Starting in May 2006, when OPG's revenue on energy
produced by unregulated facilities (includes "intermediate
and peaking hydro" as well as coal stations; excludes
"baseload hydro" and nuclear power generators) exceeds C 4.6
cents per kilowatt hour, the province directs that OPG issue
a rebate to all Ontario electricity consumers, including
residential, commercial, institutional and industrial
consumers. In May 2007, the revenue limit will be increased
to C 4.7 cents per kilowatt hour and in 2008, to C 4.8
cents. The revenue limit differs from a price cap because
OPG's generation output is bid on by distributors in the
open electricity or spot market, where the price varies
according to supply and demand. The total amount of the
rebate will depend on the difference between the market
price and the revenue limit, as well as how much output is
produced by OPG's non-regulated plants.
¶12. (SBU) The C$75 million funding for forest access roads
is earmarked primarily for fire access roads and roads
connecting communities that do not have access to existing
paved roads. These provincial forest roads are used by a
variety of industries. The Ontario Government covered the
cost of these roads, until former Premier Bob Rae's NDP
Government downloaded them to industry in the early 1990s.
¶13. (SBU) Most of the trees harvested (88%) in Ontario are
located on public or crown land, a resource managed by the
provincial government on behalf of the people of Ontario.
The cost of updating forest resource inventories (FRIs) was
downloaded to industry by the provincial Conservative
Government of former Premier Harris in the 1990s. The
current Liberal Government of Premier McGuinty has set aside
TORONTO 00001144 003 OF 003
C$10 million to pay for FRIs. MNR expects these inventories
will be compiled through satellite images and topography,
rather than through more costly labor-intensive methods.
¶14. (SBU) Ontario government officials hope that innovative
value-added wood products will boost Ontario's forestry
industry. They cite oriented strandboard (OSB) (a composite
construction material made of poplar strands or wafers and
resins, developed in the 1970s, but now used extensively in
housing construction), and engineered lumber as products
that could help offset the industry losses from declining
demand for newsprint.
Stumpage Fees
-------------
¶15. (SBU) The Ontario Government announced on February 22,
2006 that it would retroactively reduce stumpage fees for
all softwood and hardwood species for 2005-6 by refunding
C$70 million to the industry, and for three years, reduce
stumpage charges by C$3 million annually for white birch and
veneer-grade poplar located on crown land. The stumpage fee
is paid by companies or individuals to the MNR for the
privilege of cutting trees from public land. The stumpage
fee reduction was not something that was recommended in the
report from the MNR's Advisory Council on Forest Sector
Competitiveness. Natural Resources Minister Ramsay hopes
companies will use the capital infusion to invest in their
Ontario facilities.
¶16. (SBU) Both birch and poplar trees are fast-growing and
considered under-utilized species. These reductions,
combined with road construction, are expected to reduce the
cost of wood delivery for Ontario producers by more than C$4
per cubic meter on average over the next three years. The
cost of delivering wood to mills in Ontario is about C$55
per cubic meter, compared with a worldwide average of C$35.
Comment
-------
¶17. (SBU) The province's investments have come too late for
many mills, including Abitibi-Consolidated's 80 year old
Kenora mill, which shut down just before Christmas,
eliminating 320 unionized jobs from that remote community.
The company blamed the shutdown on high production costs in
Kenora, especially high electricity costs. On the other
hand, top energy professionals do not expect Ontario's
electricity crunch to be resolved until subsidies are
replaced by full-market pricing for electricity. Critics
say that reducing stumpage fees is not going to solve the
industry's electricity problem, though sawmills may benefit
more than paper mills because they do not consume as much
energy.
¶18. (SBU) Ontario's latest forestry policy is not going to
stop the inevitable closure of older, smaller Ontario
sawmills. To remain competitive, Ontario producers will
have to shift their focus to state-of-the-art and mega mills
through mergers and acquisitions. Abitibi-Consolidated is
still the fourth largest softwood lumber producer in Canada,
after Canfor, West Fraser Timber and Tolko, producing 2,108
million board feet in 2005. Through consolidation and
focusing on new markets, the Ontario softwood lumber
industry will survive, but not without casualties. The
Ontario Government believes their investments are not trade-
distorting subsidies under WTO rules. However, Ontario
Natural Resources Minister Ramsay's decision to reduce
stumpage fees has raised suspicion among U.S. producers.
TUNIS