

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08OTTAWA1032, CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS STIR DEBATE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08OTTAWA1032.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08OTTAWA1032 | 2008-08-01 18:06 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO1777
PP RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHMT RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #1032/01 2141800
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 011800Z AUG 08
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8278
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 001032
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV CA
SUBJECT: CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS STIR DEBATE
¶1. (SBU) Summary. Federal and provincial Canadian Human
Rights Commissions and Tribunals have over recent years come
under intensified criticism, largely due to high-profile hate
speech complaints, including about a controversial article on
Muslims in Maclean's, a prominent Canadian magazine. An
all-Mission Canada reporting officers' DVC on July 28
compared perceptions about and performance of the federal
commission and the provincial equivalents, discovering a
common track record of generally solid performance in support
of human rights and against discrimination, despite some
problems. This cable will examine the federal commission and
its framework, while septel will provide insights into the
workings of the provincial bodies. End summary.
¶2. (U) The federal Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC)
administers the Canadian Human Rights Act and is responsible
for enforcing the federal Employment Equity Act. It has
jurisdiction over all federally regulated employers,
including federal departments and agencies, airlines,
television and radio stations, and the Internet. The
Employment Equity Act covers more than a million federally
regulated employees. The CHRC's work focuses on three main
areas: resolving discrimination disputes; working with
employers to prevent discrimination; and, educating
stakeholders about human rights.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
------------------
¶3. (SBU) The CHRC serves as a screening body for the Canadian
Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT). Chief Commissioner Jennifer
Lynch confirmed to PolMinCouns on July 21 that the CHRC
attempts to resolve as many disputes as possible by
mediation, and only ends up referring a small percentage of
complaints to the CHRT for judgment. Annually, the CHRC
receives about 15,000 inquiries, of which only approximately
700 turn into complaints and 80 go to the CHRT.
Disability-related disputes invariably make up the largest
proportion of complaints. In 2007, 36 pct of complaints
dealt with disabilities, 13 pct with gender, 12 pct with
national or ethnic origin, 12 pct with age, and the remaining
27 pct with a variety of other grounds for discrimination.
¶4. (SBU) The CHRC's first step after receiving an inquiry is
to determine whether the allegations fall within its
jurisdiction as established by the Canadian Human Rights Act.
If the case is within its jurisdiction, CHRC officials seek
"Early Resolution" through an on-the-record series of
facilitated telephone conversations. If this process is
unsuccessful, or if a telephone discussion is impractical,
the case goes to "Preventive Mediation," which involves
face-to-face conversations aimed at establishing a mutually
acceptable resolution. If CHRC officials exhaust these
options, the claimant can file a formal complaint, which goes
to the CHRC's Investigations Division. Following an
investigation, Commissioners can dismiss the complaint,
appoint a conciliator, or refer the matter to the CHRT. The
CHRT can impose penalties up to C$20,000 (US$19,499), or
order other forms of non-financial redress. Respondents may
appeal CHRT decisions to the Federal Court of Canada for
review. Ultimately, a case could proceed to the Supreme
Court of Canada, although such appeals are rare.
¶5. (SBU) According to its own statistics, the CHRC resolves
eighty percent of cases via some type of mediation or
settlement instead of referral to the CHRT. Since Chief
Commissioner Lynch's appointment in 2007, the CHRC has placed
an extra emphasis on early resolution in order to clear up
long-standing backlogs and to resolve cases more quickly.
Qlong-standing backlogs and to resolve cases more quickly.
This approach has the added benefit of cost savings; cases
resolved at the mediation stage cost taxpayers an average of
C$4,000 (US$3,905), while cases that go to CHRT cost as much
as C$40,000 (US$39,055), not including the parties' personal
or legal expenses. The CHRC sends its own counsels to
approximately 50 pct of cases at the CHRT. Commission
officials explained that the CHRC had discontinued its
previous practice of representation at all CHRT cases due in
part to limited resources but also to avoid giving the
impression that it represents the complainants. When a CHRC
counsel is present, it is as the representative of the
"public interest," rather than of a specific party.
According to Commission officials, the "public interest" is
not necessarily the same as a claimant's interest, but these
interests overlap in the majority of cases. Parties may
separately choose to retain counsel, but are under no
obligation to do so, and must pay all legal fees themselves.
PREVENTION AND EDUCATION
------------------------
¶6. (SBU) The CHRC devotes considerable resources on
pro-active initiatives to prevent discrimination and to
OTTAWA 00001032 002 OF 003
educate stakeholders on human rights. The CHRC has
established Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) with a number
of employers of federal jurisdiction, including the Canadian
Border Services Agency, the Canadian Forces, Canada Post, and
WestJet Airlines. After establishing an MOU with the CHRC,
employers become part of an Employer Advisory Council, which
meets quarterly to discuss ways to prevent discrimination in
the workplace. The CHRC also directs a variety of other
prevention programs, including an annual Discrimination
Prevention Forum and an Employment Equity Compliance Program.
¶7. (SBU) Separately, the CHRC conducts research and publishes
studies to develop stakeholders' and public knowledge of
human rights. In 2007, the CHRC published a guide to help
employers properly manage concerns of employees who have
returned to the work-force after prolonged absences due to
disability or illness. The Commission also released two
reports on the legal and medical aspects of environmental
sensitivities, including guidelines for accommodation of
these sensitivities. The CHRC is also active in
international human rights fora, and Chief Commissioner Lynch
is simultaneously Chair of the International Coordinating
Committee of National Human Rights Institutes. Chief
Commissioner Lynch told PolMinCouns that she regretted the
absence of a U.S. representative on the ICC and would welcome
some U.S. participation.
HATE SPEECH
-----------
¶8. (SBU) The debate over hate speech and acceptable limits of
free speech and expression has been ongoing in Canada since
1977, when Parliament enacted the Canadian Human Rights Act,
which includes a specific hate speech provision. Section 13
of the Act prohibits the repeated telephonic communication
of any matter "likely to expose a person or persons to hatred
or contempt." The 2001 Anti-Terrorism Act clarified that
Section 13 applies to the Internet, giving the CHRC specific
jurisdiction over hate speech on the Internet. In 2007, the
CHRC received 16 complaints alleging a breach of Section 13,
representing approximately 2 pct of all complaints. Since
2001, the CHRC has rendered 14 decisions on Section 13
complaints, 13 of which were against the respondent.
¶9. (SBU) Critics of the CHRC have argued that it is
interpreting its mandate too broadly, leading to undue
restrictions on the freedoms of speech and expression. Some
have claimed that CHRC and the CHRT processes can result in
innocent respondents incurring substantial costs to defend
themselves. In response, Liberal MP Keith Martin has put
forward a private member's motion in the House of Commons to
repeal Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, while
Conservative MP Rick Dykstra has introduced a motion calling
for the House of Commons' Justice and Human Rights Committee
to re-examine the mandate of the CHRC and how it interprets
Section 13. Neither has come to a vote.
¶10. (SBU) The CHRC's best known hate speech case was a 2006
complaint filed by the Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC) and a
group of Muslim law students against Maclean's magazine
regarding the publication of a selection of articles and book
excerpts by author Mark Steyn. The group separately filed
concurrent complaints with provincial human rights
commissions/tribunals in Ontario and British Columbia,
alleging that the magazine had violated human rights by
publishing anti-Islamic articles and refusing to publish the
CIC's rebuttal. In June 2008, the CHRC declined to proceed
with the complaint, concluding that, while the articles were
"obviously calculated to excite discussion and even offend
Q"obviously calculated to excite discussion and even offend
certain readers," the views were "not of an extreme nature,
as defined by the Supreme Court." The Ontario Human Rights
Commission also dismissed the case, arguing it fell outside
its jurisdiction. The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal
held hearings that closed in June 2008; a ruling is still
pending. (Note: Septel on provincial human rights
commissions will examine in more depth. End note.)
¶11. (SBU) According to Chief Commissioner Lynch and other
CHRC officials, such criticisms are unjustified. They
pointed out that the CHRC is legally required to accept and
process all complaints that fall under its jurisdiction, and
officials carefully adhere to the Canadian Supreme Court
ruling that determined what constitutes "hate speech." The
Chief Commissioner emphasized that Canadian law clearly
differs from U.S. law, in that, while the First Amendment of
the U.S. Constitution provides for open-ended freedom of
expression, Canadian legislators and courts have attempted to
"strike a balance" between protecting freedom of expression
and outlawing hate speech. Specifically, the Canadian
Supreme Court ruled that Section 13 does infringe on freedom
of expression, but that this infringement is justified under
Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,
OTTAWA 00001032 003 OF 003
which provides that the Charter is subject to "such
reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably
justified in a free and democratic society."
¶12. (SBU) CHRC officials privately acknowledged the political
sensitivity of the hate speech issue, but asserted that the
Maclean's magazine case was "unique," that Parliament never
intended Section 13 issues to apply to mainstream media, and
that, with the dismissal of the case, the CHRC's focus would
shift back to the worst examples of hate speech. They
insisted that the CHRC is on the "right side" of the debate
with respect to finding an appropriate balance between free
speech and expression and prohibiting heinous speech that
promotes hatred and contempt. However, in June 2008, the
CHRC launched a comprehensive policy review of how best to
address hate messages on the Internet, with a report due in
fall 2008.
¶13. (SBU) Comment: Most of the CHRC's real work goes on
under the public radar, although the tens of thousands of
inquiries in recent years are a clear indication that
Canadians are indeed sensitive to possible violations of
their human or equal rights and are seeking remedies to
perceived discrimination -- most of which the CHRC appears to
have been able successfully to resolve. Its education and
foreign assistance activities also appear laudable and
useful. Despite the CHRC's ultimate dismissal of the
Maclean's case, the hate crime issue will likely continue to
consume considerable resources and divert energies away from
the CHRC's more mainstream programs and foci, while the
problem of "forum shopping" -- as in the Maclean's case -- is
apt to grow, absent some clearer Parliamentary delineation of
jurisdictions between the federal and provincial levels and
among the provinces.
Visit Canada,s Economy and Environment Forum at
http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/can ada
WILKINS