

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 04OTTAWA3431, SUMMIT AGENDA ON COMMON PROSPERITY: THOUGHTS ON
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04OTTAWA3431.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
04OTTAWA3431 | 2004-12-21 21:09 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 003431
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/CAN:TBREESE, AHOLST; EB/TPP/BTA/EWH:AARON
WHITE HOUSE/NSC FOR FARYAR SHIRZAD
STATE PASS USTR FOR SAGE CHANDLER
USDOC FOR 4320/OFFICE OF NAFTA/GWORD/TFOX; 3134/OIO/WESTERN
HEMISPHERE
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD CA
SUBJECT: SUMMIT AGENDA ON COMMON PROSPERITY: THOUGHTS ON
NEXT STEPS ON THE REGULATORY FRONT
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: AT THE BILATERAL SUMMIT ON NOVEMBER 30,
2004, THE PRESIDENT AND CANADIAN PM PAUL MARTIN AGREED TO AN
AGENDA FOR "COMMON SECURITY, COMMON PROSPERITY" THAT
COMMITTED THE TWO SIDES TO "PURSUE JOINT APPROACHES TO
PARTNERSHIPS, CONSENSUS STANDARDS, AND SMARTER REGULATIONS
THAT RESULT IN GREATER EFFICIENCY AND COMPETITIVENESS, WHILE
ENHANCING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF OUR CITIZENS". WE
UNDERSTAND THAT DISCUSSIONS ARE ALREADY UNDERWAY AMONG
CAPITALS ABOUT HOW TO MOVE FORWARD ON THIS COMMITMENT.
¶2. (SBU) CANADIAN INTEREST IN THIS AGENDA PROBABLY STEMS
FROM THE RELEASE OF THE "SMART REGULATION" REPORT, WHICH
MADE IT CLEAR THAT NORTH AMERICAN STANDARDS AND REGULATORY
REGIMES SHOULD BE A PRIORITY FOR CANADIAN REGULATORS. WE
BELIEVE THAT THE COMBINATION OF A BILATERAL COMMITMENT TO
JOINT APPROACHES AND GOC CONSIDERATION OF THE SMART
REGULATION AGENDA PRESENTS AN OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP A
PROCESS THAT CAN EVENTUALLY REDUCE REGULATORY DIVERGENCE -
THE "TYRANNY OF SMALL DIFFERENCES" THAT INHIBITS TRADE AND
REDUCES CONSUMER CHOICE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER. THIS
CABLE DESCRIBES THE "SMART REGULATION" INITIATIVE AND
OUTLINES OUR IDEAS FOR MOVING TOWARD MORE LONG-TERM, BROAD-
BASED REGULATORY COOPERATION. END SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION: THE SMART REGULATION INITIATIVE
---------------------------------------------
¶2. (U) FOR CANADA, THE BENEFITS OF NAFTA HAVE BEEN CLEAR,
INCLUDING THE DOUBLING OF TRADE THAT IS NOW STRAINING BORDER
INFRASTRUCTURE. FURTHER GROWTH, HOWEVER, WHILE LIKELY, WILL
BE CONSTRAINED BOTH BY BORDER INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITATIONS,
WHICH ARE BEING ADDRESSED IN THE SMART BORDER PROCESS, AND
BY REGULATORY DIFFERENCES WHICH CONTINUE TO IMPEDE ENTRY OF
NEW PRODUCTS INTO THE MARKET AND LIMIT CONSUMER CHOICE.
3.(U) CANADA HAS JUST COMPLETED A THOROUGH STAKEHOLDER
REVIEW OF ITS REGULATORY PROCESSES AND STRUCTURE. THE
CANADIAN "EXTERNAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SMART REGULATION",
CONVENED IN 2003, RELEASED ITS FINAL REPORT IN SEPTEMBER
¶2004. THE COMMITTEE OBSERVED THAT ".CANADA AND THE UNITED
STATES MAINTAIN PARALLEL PROCESSES AND STRUCTURES ACROSS
ALMOST ALL AREAS OF REGULATORY ACTIVITY. THEIR TWO SETS OF
PROCESSES REFLECT A CONVERGENCE IN POLICY OBJECTIVES AND
REGULATORY PROCEDURES. HOWEVER, MUCH OF THIS WORK IS
DUPLICATIVE, PARTICULARLY GIVEN THE INTEGRATED NORTH
AMERICAN MARKET. THE OUTCOME CAN BE POOR REGULATORY AND
ECONOMIC RESULTS AND HIGHER COSTS FOR GOVERNMENTS, CONSUMERS
AND BUSINESSES."
4.(U) THE COMMITTEE MADE THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS,
AMONG OTHERS:
--THE GOC SHOULD INCLUDE INTERNATIONAL REGULATORY
COOPERATION AS A DISTINCT OBJECTIVE OF CANADIAN FOREIGN
POLICY, WITH A PRIMARY AND IMMEDIATE FOCUS ON NORTH AMERICA,
AND DEVELOP AN AGENDA FOR NORTH AMERICAN REGULATORY
COOPERATION.
--CANADA-SPECIFIC REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SHOULD DIFFER FROM
INTERNATIONAL OR NORTH AMERICAN MODELS ONLY WHERE THERE ARE
IMPORTANT NATIONAL PRIORITIES, UNIQUE CANADIAN CONDITIONS OR
CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, OR EXISTING MODELS ARE INADEQUATE TO
CANADIAN POLICY OBJECTIVES;
--CANADA SHOULD PROMOTE JOINT PRODUCT REVIEWS AND MOVE
TOWARD ACCEPTING U.S. AND EU PRODUCT APPROVALS IN SECTORS
WITH WELL-ESTABLISHED CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES;
--CANADA SHOULD STRENGTHEN INTERAGENCY REGULATORY
COORDINATION AND DEVELOP OVERARCHING REGULATORY POLICY
FRAMEWORKS FOR KEY SECTORS.
IN ORDER TO PUT THESE RECOMMENDATIONS INTO OPERATION, THE
COMMITTEE PROPOSED THAT THE GOC FORM MULTISTAKEHOLDER "SWAT
TEAMS" TO IDENTIFY TROUBLESOME REGULATORY DIFFERENCES AND
PROPOSE SOLUTIONS. THE COMMITTEE IDENTIFIED AS PRIORITY
AREAS:
--MANUFACTURING/PRODUCT APPROVAL;
--BIOTECHNOLOGY/LIFE SCIENCES;
--ENABLING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR FIRST NATIONS;
--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESSES; AND
--OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT.
(THE FULL REPORT IS AVAILABLE AT
HTTP://WWW.SMARTREGULATION.GC.CA)
A "SMART" NORTH AMERICAN PROCESS?
---------------------------------
5.(SBU) We suggest that, in the context of our commitments
in the November 30 statement, Washington agencies think
about developing a broad-based bilateral or trilateral
review of regulations that draws on these recommendations.
While such a process could yield short-term deliverables,
more importantly, it would set the stage for real progress
in finding and eliminating a broader list of longstanding
regulatory barriers than the NAI process has addressed so
far.
BRINGING REGULATORY EXPERTS TOGETHER
------------------------------------
6.(SBU) In our view, the logical first step would be to
develop channels of communication between the regulatory
oversight bodies, OMB and the GoC Privy Council Office (PCO)
to exchange information on regulatory initiatives underway,
set compatible timetables where possible and review existing
regulations to identify areas for revision, or areas where
we could negotiate mutual recognition agreements. U.S.
officials could also share experience on strengthening
regulatory oversight and interagency coordination, a key
recommendation of the Smart Regulation report.
7.(SBU) The agenda for these exchanges could include review
of existing promising models, such as the joint PMRA and EPA
pesticide review process, and a look at sectors identified
in the Smart Regulation report and previous NAI discussions.
These could include some aspects of drug approvals,
processed food containers, and federal/state/provincial
regulatory requirements for construction products.
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS
----------------------
8.(SBU) Second, Washington agencies may also want to
explore how to involve business and other stakeholders.
Options include expanding the Canadian approach to convene
North American "SWAT teams" of government, industry and
consumer representatives that review regulatory issues by
sector and report back to governments. Another model might
be a North American equivalent of the "Transatlantic
Business Dialogue (TABD)" which effectively articulated
business priorities for US-EU regulatory cooperation in the
1990s.
9.(SBU) Alternatively, or in parallel, both (or all three)
governments could encourage maximum participation by
stakeholders in the "smart regulation" process within
Canada. The Committee urged the GoC to designate a Minister
to invite interested stakeholders to identify those
regulatory differences for which elimination would not
impede Canadian social (including health and safety) and
environmental objectives. In any case, we should ensure that
the USG and the U.S. private sector participate in this
process as stakeholders and make recommendations by June
¶2005.
TIMETABLE AND DELIVERABLES
--------------------------
10.(SBU) Under this framework we could call on regulatory
officials to reach certain objectives within twelve months,
to serve as deliverables at a future NAFTA Summit or meeting
of the New Partnership in North America. Examples of twelve-
month deliverables include:
--Swat Team Reports: Stakeholder groups or "Swat Teams"
issue reports on priority list of regulatory differences to
address via harmonization or mutual recognition. Such a
list could include both bilateral and trilateral priorities,
depending on feasibility.
--Regulatory oversight bodies: OMB and PCO develop mechanism
for consulting on new regulatory projects, decision
mechanism for selecting regulations for parallel
consideration or MRAs. (e.g. applying EPA/PMRA pesticide
model to other agencies)
--Joint approvals: Independent agencies develop consultation
process for joint approvals. Example: CFIA and USDA could
look into simultaneous approval processes for new seed
varieties.
--Initiation of joint reviews: An 18-month deliverable could
be announcement/Federal Register/Gazette notices of first
joint reviews of regulations in priority sectors.
11.(SBU) Such a framework would be a long-term investment
in addition to an effort to identify "low-hanging fruit" in
the regulatory sphere, although such a broad-based process
might bring to light additional areas where early results
are possible beyond those already identified in NAI
discussions. Post (Econ and FCS) would be prepared to
support the process by working intensively with local U.S.
and Canadian business contacts and regulators, DOC, and USTR
to identify possible items for short, medium and long-term
work programs across a number of sectors.