

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07REYKJAVIK322, ICELANDIC DEFENSE POLICY ONE YEAR AFTER U.S. WITHDRAWAL
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07REYKJAVIK322.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07REYKJAVIK322 | 2007-11-09 17:05 | 2011-01-13 05:05 | SECRET | Embassy Reykjavik |
VZCZCXYZ0010
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHRK #0322/01 3131701
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
R 091701Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3492
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE 0065
RHMFISS/HQ USAFE RAMSTEIN AB GE
RHMFISS/COMNAVREG EUR NAPLES IT
RULSJGA/COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC
RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE
RUEKDIA/DIA WASHDC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
S E C R E T REYKJAVIK 000322
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EUR/NB, EUR/RPM
OSD-P FOR DAVID CATE
OSD RESERVE AFFAIRS FOR ASD HALL
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/06/2017
TAGS: PREL MARR PGOV PINR IC
SUBJECT: ICELANDIC DEFENSE POLICY ONE YEAR AFTER U.S. WITHDRAWAL
Refs: A) 06 Reykjavik 85 B) 06 Reykjavik 357
C) 06 Reykjavik 359 D) 06 Reykjavik 364
E) 06 Reykjavik 401 F) Reykjavik 01
G) Reykjavik 69 H) Reykjavik 99
I) Reykjavik 192 J) Reykjavik 247
K) Reykjavik 298
Classified By: Amb. Carol van Voorst for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
¶1. (C) Summary: A year after the closure of U.S. Naval Air Station
Keflavik and the withdrawal of permanent U.S. forces from Iceland,
Post agrees with Prime Minister Haarde that the turnover went better
than either party expected. After recovering from the initial shock
of our base closure notification in March 2006, the Icelandic
Government has solidified its defense links with its neighbors and
within NATO, successfully hosted U.S. and NATO ship visits as well as
a multinational air defense and counterterrorism exercise,
strengthened its Coast Guard in resources and in international ties,
and begun canvassing for NATO air policing support. Former base
properties now house university students and academic research
centers. Although several difficult issues remain -- intelligence
cooperation and the future of the air defense radar system among them
-- they are partially due to domestic political considerations, and
will be solved as the new coalition government settles in. With
climate change, a likely increase in North Atlantic energy shipments,
a new focus on Arctic resources, and a more visible Russian presence,
the High North could easily reemerge as an area of high strategic
importance in the decades ahead. U.S. interests in the region will
be well served by encouraging Iceland to continue to develop its
security and defense capabilities while we keep our defense
options--including access to the base--open. End Summary.
From protests to robust joint efforts
-------------------------------------
¶2. (C) When we notified the Icelandic Government in March 2006 of
the decision to close U.S. Naval Air Station Keflavik (NASKEF) in six
months, bitter disappointment and, in some quarters, outrage were
evident. Commentators predicted the end of the bilateral
relationship and opined that the 1951 U.S-Iceland Defense Agreement
was now worthless. Former Prime Minister David Oddsson let it be
known that had he been in office, he would have immediately abrogated
the treaty and ejected the U.S. military ahead of the September
deadline. Minister of Justice Bjorn Bjarnason, considered by many
the most pro-U.S. and pro-NATO member of the cabinet, acidly
questioned U.S. dependability in defense matters.
¶3. (SBU) A year after NASKEF's closure, the state of the bilateral
relationship is quite different from the gloomy predictions. This
past August, Prime Minister Haarde told former lead negotiator ASD
Tom Hall and Commander U.S. Air Force Europe (USAFE) General Tom
Hobbins that "no one could have imagined a year ago how well things
would turn out." Negotiations in 2006 resulted in a technical
agreement to close the base and a political Joint Understanding
pointing the way forward. The continuing defense relationship was
then made visible to the public by cooperation on two major ship
visits, a search-and-rescue training visit by a U.S. P-3 aircraft,
and a large-scale multinational air defense and counterterrorism
exercise. Links between the Icelandic and U.S. Coast Guards -- both
bilaterally and within the newly-formed North Atlantic Coast Guard
Forum -- continue to grow in depth and breadth. Exchanges in law
enforcement training and operational information have shown results
in counter-narcotics and document fraud detection work. Politically,
we have worked together at NATO to gain consensus on a peacetime air
defense plan for Iceland; transferred Iceland's air defense radar
system and are nearing completion of future support arrangements; and
held the first round of high-level Security Dialogue consultations as
outlined in the Joint Understanding.
Looking beyond the bilateral relationship
-----------------------------------------
¶4. (C) Outside the bilateral field, PM Haarde has pressed ahead with
a strategy of greater engagement with Iceland's neighboring NATO
Allies. In early 2007, Iceland signed agreements with Norway and
Denmark on increased defense and security cooperation, and began
talks with the UK and Canada along the same lines. Despite a change
in government (and Foreign Minister) in May, the GOI has continued to
flesh out the earlier agreements. These efforts have resulted in
increased visits by Danish Navy and Coast Guard vessels, as well as
the participation of Norwegian and Danish forces in the NORTHERN
VIKING air defense and counterterrorism exercise in August 2007.
Norway was among the first NATO Allies to show interest in providing
aircraft for air policing in Iceland. MFA efforts to secure periodic
air policing represent a welcome change in Iceland's traditional
approach to defense: a recognition that Iceland must assume more
responsibility and, to accomplish this, must be more active within
the Alliance in promoting its own affairs. The recent MFA briefing
for all resident NATO ambassadors on air policing was a first: a
true lobbying effort directed at capitals. The brief was a shrewd
sales pitch, including pledges of significant host nation support for
the mission, which would be funded out of the first-ever defense
budget in the Icelandic government's history. This budget ($8.6
million of a total GOI budget of $6.9 billion) is a concrete
acknowledgment that Iceland has realized it needs to provide more for
its own defense.
¶5. (C) Along the same lines, the GOI has boosted efforts to provide
for greater domestic security. In the last year, the Icelandic Coast
Guard (ICG) has awarded contracts for a new patrol vessel and
fixed-wing aircraft, while also leasing three search and rescue (SAR)
helicopters to replace the USAF helos that previously provided SAR
backup. Minister of Justice Bjarnason, who controls the ICG, has
been developing a plan for procurement of permanent helo support and
has been discussing joint purchases with the Norwegian SAR
authorities. The ICG has also continued a practice of robust
international deployments of the ICG Explosive Ordnance Disposal
(EOD) team to peacekeeping operations, most recently in Lebanon in
the winter of 2006-2007. Post has encouraged the MOJ and ICG to make
their procurement and training plans with an eye towards maintaining
the capacity to deploy abroad in NATO or UN peacekeeping operations.
¶6. (U) Smart governance has also mitigated the local impact of
NASKEF's closure on the community of Reykjanesbaer/Keflavik. Job
losses, initially feared to be in the hundreds, were minimal as all
but a handful of 700-plus former NASKEF employees found new work.
This was due to quick engagement by the outgoing NASKEF/Iceland
Defense Force command and the town of Reykjanesbaer in providing job
referral and counseling services, helped by the robust Icelandic
economy and a low unemployment rate. Similar focused planning and
creative thinking are turning the base facilities into a significant
plus for the economy and society. On the first anniversary of the
March 2006 base closure notification, the Government of Iceland
announced plans to create a university-level academic institution on
the former NASKEF site. The "Keilir Atlantic Center for Excellence"
has already begun operations. Among other initiatives, it hosted
productive meetings with U.S. Assistant Secretary of Energy for
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Alexander Karsner and the
Director of the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory during
summer 2007. Discussions are underway about a formal relationship on
renewable energy research. Meanwhile, the Keflavik Airport
Development Corporation (KADECO), established to handle other
commercially viable real estate on the base, opened 1100 apartments
for rental by eager university students and brought in nearly $270
million from the sale of other buildings on the base.
Remaining Issues: Intelligence, Division of Labor
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶7. (S) Despite progress, some areas of difficulty remain,
particularly in the fields of intelligence-sharing and the operation
of the Iceland Air Defense System (IADS). These issues are rooted in
domestic political battles. On intelligence matters, Icelandic law
does not authorize any collection other than for law enforcement
purposes, and the MFA and Justice Ministry are consequently engaged
in a turf battle over the intelligence portfolio. The MFA has
responsibility for coordination with NATO Allies on defense matters
while police, under the authority of the MOJ, handle international
law enforcement cooperation. At the same time, the MOJ-controlled
Coast Guard and "Viking Squad" special police are the units most
likely to operate together with NATO military units during exercises
in Iceland and elsewhere. As such, the MFA and MOJ have been the
main players in a tug-of-war over intelligence authority, a battle
which has thus far stalled serious efforts to provide USG training
and institute regular intelligence exchanges (a stated goal in the
Joint Understanding).
¶8. (C) Similarly, the MOJ has tried to grab authority for operation
of the IADS air defense radars from the MFA, with Minister Bjarnason
arguing that in peacetime the system plays more of a "homeland
security" role than a defense role. Though this argument has not yet
produced any results, it has been a distraction in the MFA's task of
reorganizing the Iceland Radar Agency (the state-owned corporation
that operates IADS) in order to cut costs. The press has been quick
to note that recent management decisions have been handled clumsily.
However, the MFA plans to introduce legislation this winter to
formally bring the Radar Agency under its authority and clarify the
agency's status under Icelandic law. Likely to go unaddressed are
ongoing questions regarding combat controllers and rules of
engagement for IADS and any NATO air defense assets it operates with,
meaning that continued bilateral and NATO engagement on this matter
will be necessary.
¶9. (C) A further complication is posed by incoming Foreign Minister
Gisladottir, who is struggling to reconcile her instinctive
discomfort with the use of force to the defense and security
responsibilities in her portfolio. The Social Democratic Alliance
(SDA) party she leads has never been able to agree on a defense
policy, not least because of its fairly large pacifist wing. After
some early stumbles -- e.g., announcing the news of Iceland's
withdrawal from the NATO Training Mission Iraq on the day of SACEUR's
visit to Reykjavik in September -- Gisladottir has proven to be an
interested student on defense issues. Even her strong reluctance to
allow Icelandic peacekeepers to be armed while abroad may be
softening somewhat in response to interlocutors' arguments that
unarmed peacekeepers can be as much of a force protection burden as
they are an asset to deployed units. Both her senior Political
Advisor and the MFA Defense Department Chief have told the Ambassador
in recent weeks of her keen desire for additional information and
discussion in security matters. Continued engagement and exposure
will likely prove the best means to develop the Foreign Minister into
a long-term partner.
The Road Ahead
--------------
¶10. (C) This fall, Minister of Justice Bjarnason and others in
Iceland have been nearly overcome with "I told you so" fever in
response to increased Russian air activity and renewed territorial
claims in the Arctic. To these observers, the decision to close the
base was a strategic mistake: climate change, increased shipping
routes and oil exploration in the North Atlantic and Arctic, and a
resurgent Russia will make the High North (and Iceland) more
strategically significant in the future, not less. Post has
countered that the current status quo--ongoing support for the 1951
Agreement combined with first class maintenance of base military
facilities, periodic exercises, and an agile U.S. and NATO force
structure--keep our options open.
¶11. (C) To that end, our military engagement with Iceland should
continue along current lines. Regular exercises and operational unit
visits will demonstrate the U.S. interest in and ability to live up
to our bilateral commitment. We should show support and provide
training opportunities for the Icelandic units most likely to be
called on in a crisis. Initial discussions for the NORTHERN VIKING
2008 exercise have focused on a USN role with the possibility of USCG
involvement, which meshes perfectly with this aim. While
arrangements for a more robust intelligence relationship depend on
Icelandic domestic political decisions, we should continue to offer
our assistance and make clear what is available once local obstacles
are overcome. Similarly, post will continue to explore ways to
increase Icelandic participation in U.S. training opportunities, of
which the GOI has not thus far taken full advantage. A crucial tool
in our progress thus far has been EUCOM's provision of an activated
reserve officer to support Embassy Reykjavik. This position serves
as the key link between the USG and Icelandic government institutions
recalculating their strategic worldview and seeking to improve their
security capabilities. Embassy Reykjavik believes funding for this
position beyond spring 2008 will be essential in helping Iceland's
transformation into a more active and capable NATO ally.
¶12. (C) Politically, we should continue to support Iceland's efforts
to increase its defense ties with other NATO Allies and neighbors.
We also want to quietly but strongly support efforts to improve the
quality of the national discussion on defense and security affairs,
such as the FM's appointment on 8 November of a working group to
study Iceland's strategic environment. Continued expert- and
high-level discussions under the Security Dialogue rubric are a
further means of engagement and should be maintained, particularly as
Iceland faces up to the possibility of winning election to the UN
Security Council for the 2009-2010 term. We should accommodate the
request for a second series of discussions at the U/S level, in late
winter/early spring, if possible in the U.S. These steps will help
ensure that we and the Icelanders will be in sync as the security
environment in the High North evolves.
van Voorst