

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08WELLINGTON64, 2008 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - NEW ZEALAND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08WELLINGTON64.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08WELLINGTON64 | 2008-02-22 03:03 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO4335
RR RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0064/01 0530316
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 220316Z FEB 08
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5089
INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5113
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1630
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0647
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 0213
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000064
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR EAP/ANP, EEB/TPP/IPE JBOGER, STATE PASS TO USTR JENNIFER
GROVES AND COMMERCE FOR CASSIE PETERS ITA/MAC/OIPR
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR NZ
SUBJECT: 2008 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - NEW ZEALAND
REF: STATE 9475
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Post recommends that New Zealand (GNZ) not/not be
placed on the Special 301 List in 2008. The country's overall
commitment to the protection of intellectual property (IPR) is
relatively high as compared to most countries cited in the Special
301 review. Despite the slower than anticipated pace of legislative
progress, the government remains committed to updating its
intellectual property laws to ensure compliance with international
standards, with planned revisions of the Patents Bill and the
Copyright Amendments Bill ("New Technologies and Performers' Rights
Bill") progressing through the legislative queue. Some momentum has
been lost over the past year due to slowdown in the legislative
agenda as the Government shifts its attention to upcoming elections
in 2008. Though New Zealand generally provides adequate and
effective protection of intellectual property rights (IP) under
current law, Post will continue to engage Members of Parliament, the
Ministry of Economic Development and local IP industry in order to
press our concerns that pending legislation reflects international
IP standards and passage occurs in a timely fashion. To date issues
raised about the draft Copyright Bill by IP industry are being
considered by the government and will be monitored by Post. It's
reasonable to anticipate a renewed commitment to the passage of IP
legislation by the GNZ post election cycle. Placing New Zealand on
the Special 301 list at this stage may prove to be
counter-productive as it likely will result in a defensive rather
than consultative exchange. End summary.
International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA)'s Special
Mention of New Zealand's IP Regime
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶2. (U) As IIPA noted in its Special 301 submission, that the
Commerce Committee of the New Zealand Parliament issued its
long-awaited report on the Copyright (New Technologies and
Performer's Rights) Amendment Bill in July 2007. This extensive
proposed amendment to New Zealand's copyright law contains many
valuable improvements but some provisions remain problematic for
industry. Post agrees with IIPA's recommendation that an effective
course of action would be to continue to engage the government in
order to ensure that the draft legislation provides more useful
tools for dealing with piracy. Post has presented the list of noted
shortfalls in the draft legislation to Minister Tizard (Consumer
Affairs), Minister Goff (Trade) and to officials within the Ministry
of Economic Development, the agency primarily responsible for
drafting legislation and monitoring IP enforcement. Post remains
engaged with Bronwyn Turley, Senior MED Policy Advisor for IP issues
to maintain a dialogue to address the needed technical corrections.
GNZ Response to IIPA Submission
-------------------------------
¶3. (U) The Copyright Bill is currently part way through its second
reading in the New Zealand Parliament. The concerns raised by IIPA
regarding the Bill's shortcomings are currently being considered by
the government. Paragraphs 4 to 15 below summarize legislation
intent and language in highlighted provisions of the draft Copyright
Bill that have been brought to GNZ's attention by the IIPA.
Detailed drafts of legal texts and proposed revisions to the
Copyright Bill can be forwarded separately from MED if required.
Anticipated Treatment of TPMs under Proposed Bill
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶4. (U) Per MED, development and employment of TPMs have raised
issues beyond the realm of copyright law for GNZ. They often relate
to disclosure issues, such as insufficient or incorrect information
to consumers concerning technological protected materials and their
usability restrictions, and could often be addressed by contract
law, privacy laws or consumer protection laws. The issuer of a TPM
would still need to comply with those other existing laws as the TPM
provisions do not 'trump' any other laws. Copyright owners can
continue using TPMs that control access, however, without assistance
from the Act. Owners could, for example, continue to rely on other
legal measures, such as the law of contract, where an access
protection measure is circumvented.
¶5. (U) GNZ notes that the WIPO Copyright Treaty 1994, to which New
Zealand is not a party yet, not only calls for nations to "provide
adequate legal protection and effective legal remedies against the
circumvention of effective technological measures" but also
recognizes "the need to maintain a balance between the rights of
authors and the large public interest, particularly education,
research and access to information" in updating international
WELLINGTON 00000064 002 OF 003
copyright norms to respond to challenges arising new technologies.
GNZ feels that the translation of this balance into domestic laws is
a matter of national circumstances and domestic policies, and
parties to this treaty have implemented the TPM provision in
different ways.
ISP liability limitation
------------------------
¶6. (U) Per MED, the Bill contains provisions which limit ISP
liability for copyright infringement by third parties. Copying is a
central function of the internet and the services provided by ISPs.
Material may be reproduced at many stages during the course of a
transmission and it can be virtually impossible to identify when and
where many of these copies are made. When the material being copied
is subject to copyright protection, an ISP could face liability for
both primary and secondary infringement of copyright. There is a
public interest in ensuring cost-effective access to the internet,
which may be affected by uncertain or increased liability for ISPs.
¶7. (U) The Select Committee made some changes to the ISP provisions.
It removed the provision that limits ISP liability only when the
ISP had adopted and reasonably implemented a policy relating to
termination of the accounts of repeat infringers. A number of
submitters raised concerns about this provision, including that it
was unnecessary (because standard ISP terms and conditions generally
already allow for this) and that its scope and application were
quite unclear.
¶8. (U) Drafting changes were made to the provisions in new sections
92B and 92C which preserve the ability for a copyright owner to seek
injunctive relief. These changes were suggested by the specialist
advisers to the Committee and arose out of concern that the
provisions were not drafted in a way that would effectively preserve
the ability for a copyright holder to seek an injunction against an
ISP.
¶9. (U) Changes were made to section 92C (2) at Select Committee and
new sections 92CA and 92CB were added. These changes arose out of
recommendations by the specialist advisers to the Committee.
Section 92C previously specified that an ISP is not infringing
unless they know or have reason to believe that the material is
infringing, and do not delete or prevent access to the material as
soon as possible after they become aware. Concern was raised by the
advisers that this test did not provide sufficient certainty for
ISPs about when they would be required to take material down, and
that it diverged from the tests used in other jurisdictions. In
response to these concerns, the following changes were made:
-- The test was altered to clarify that the ISP must either know or
have received a notice that the material was infringing;
-- There is a new requirement that notices must be properly
completed, signed and in the prescribed form;
-- There is a new offence for knowingly or recklessly providing a
notice that is materially false or misleading.
Access to Pharmaceuticals and Patent Protection
--------------------------------------------- --
¶10. (SBU) While the U.S. pharmaceutical industry (PhRMA) urges that
New Zealand be placed on the priority watch list (PWL) in 2008, post
continues to believe that the industry's restricted access to New
Zealand's market stems primarily from the cost containment
strategies for subsidized drugs that are a part of the National
Medicines Strategy (NMS). The government affiliated Pharmaceutical
Management Agency (PHARMAC) is mandated to spend less than its
budget allows, and the pharmaceutical industry has a number of
legitimate complaints about its treatment in the purchasing process.
However, these industry concerns are not IP problems per se. While
Post will continue to work to improve access for U.S.
pharmaceuticals in the New Zealand market, we believe this should be
dealt with as a market-access barrier and not as a failure to
protect intellectual property. Even the pharmaceutical industry
trade association here, Researched Medicines Industry Association of
New Zealand (RMI - affiliated with PhRMA), assesses that the
government's practices do not violate its TRIPS commitments. Post
will continue to engage appropriate Ministers and MED to find ways
to improve market access.
¶11. (SBU) While the new draft Patent Bill unfortunately has remained
on the parliamentary docket for some time now, sources at the
Ministry of Economic Development claim the Bill will meet
WELLINGTON 00000064 003 OF 003
international IP legislative standards. Modeled largely after
current British patent law, the GNZ drafters had hoped to capture
the UK's experience in structuring its revised patent regime to EU
standards. An unofficial preliminary draft version of the bill,
called an "exposure draft," was initially released in 2005 and
received only technical comments as to the form of the bill. These
have been reviewed and applied as appropriate. Despite the bill's
long gestation period, MED attorneys responsible for drafting feel
that the bill is likely to pass with little additional modification.
Under current law, the level of IP protection for pharmaceuticals
remains adequate. Post does agree that it is in New Zealand's and
our best interests to complete work on the draft Patents Bill
promptly in order to ensure that New Zealand's patent regime
reflects international standards. Post believes the better course
of action is to continue to work/consult with the GNZ to ensure
industry's concerns are reflected in pending legislation.
Enforcement
-----------
¶12. (U) GNZ remains committed to enforcing its IP laws adequately
and effectively. In most instances, the government responds to
complaints raised by rights holders against IP infringers. The
government set up a new office within New Zealand Customs in 2007
that is exclusively dedicated to IP enforcement issues. Currently,
New Zealand Customs can confiscate and destroy pirated products if
the holder of the trademark or copyright has requested that Customs
detain the goods. That request is valid for five years and can be
renewed. Almost all the infringing goods imported into New Zealand
originated in Asia, particularly China, and most of the intercepted
and investigated goods were clothing, footwear and headwear. The
number of pirated CDs and DVDs intercepted by Customs has declined
sharply, after peaking in 2006. While it appears that CDs and DVDs
are increasingly being copied to order within New Zealand, making
detection of local production increasingly difficult, industry as an
ongoing cooperative dialogue with local authorities to better police
IPR as new forms of piracy are detected.
¶13. (U) Conclusion: Post maintains that, despite certain technical
deficiencies and delays in the pending intellectual property laws,
there remains a strong commitment on the part of the GNZ to continue
to improve its IP regime and bring it into conformance with
international standards. GNZ's enforcement of current IP laws also
reflects the government's proactive stance as they learn and adapt
to help stem new forms of piracy. While there is additional work to
be done to strengthen the law and enhance enforcement, Post
recommends the better course of action is to continue engagement
with the GNZ and monitor the progress of IP legislation rather than
place New Zealand on this year's watch list. End conclusion.
MCCORMICK