

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06BEIJING9501, CHINA'S AMBITIOUS FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AGENDA FOR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06BEIJING9501.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06BEIJING9501 | 2006-05-18 06:06 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Beijing |
VZCZCXRO8915
PP RUEHCN RUEHGH
DE RUEHBJ #9501/01 1380620
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 180620Z MAY 06
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5778
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
INFO RUEHCN/AMCONSUL CHENGDU 6262
RUEHGZ/AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU 0498
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 7392
RUEHGH/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI 4564
RUEHSH/AMCONSUL SHENYANG 6076
RUEHIN/AIT TAIPEI 5551
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 1058
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 0227
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 6365
RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA 1816
RUEHKL/AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR 2247
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE 8586
RUEHBK/AMEMBASSY BANGKOK 4156
RUEHML/AMEMBASSY MANILA 8741
RUEHPF/AMEMBASSY PHNOM PENH 0883
RUEHVN/AMEMBASSY VIENTIANE 3976
RUEHGO/AMEMBASSY RANGOON 4343
RUEHHI/AMEMBASSY HANOI 3426
RUEHBD/AMEMBASSY BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN 0484
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON 0538
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 9214
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH 0538
RUEHKU/AMEMBASSY KUWAIT 0564
RUEHMK/AMEMBASSY MANAMA 0206
RUEHMS/AMEMBASSY MUSCAT 0011
RUEHDO/AMEMBASSY DOHA 0183
RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA 0371
RUEHRK/AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK 0006
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 BEIJING 009501
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
USDOC FOR DAS LEVINE AND ITA/MAC/AP/MCQUEEN
STATE PASS USTR STRATFORD, WINTER, ALTBACH
GENEVA PASS USTR
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD WTRO ECON CH AS NZ SA
SUBJECT: CHINA'S AMBITIOUS FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AGENDA FOR
2006
REFS: A) BEIJING 6453, B) BEIJING 6849, C) CANBERRA 1845,
D) SANTIAGO 2322, E) WELLINGTON 366
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM)
Minister Bo Xilai announced in early 2006 an ambitious plan
for nine free trade agreements (FTAs) covering twenty-seven
countries, according to MOFCOM officials. These twenty-
seven countries represent 18 percent of China's imports and
11 percent of Chinese exports, but the proposed agreements
would not cover all traded goods. China's growing demand
for raw materials, energy, and light manufactured goods to
support its export-led growth is fueling the trade
component of the PRC's broader "go out" policy. Preferring
to engage first in relatively easy-to-win FTAs focusing
only on goods, China is meeting resistance in negotiating
FTAs with more developed countries. Trade in services and
investment have been relegated to later stage negotiations
except in the case of Australia, which is seeking a
comprehensive FTA.
¶2. (SBU) Summary continued. China is implementing early
stage trade agreements with ASEAN, Chile and Pakistan this
year. Negotiations with Australia, New Zealand and the
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) are expected to conclude
over the next one to two years. China is conducting
feasibility studies with Iceland and South Africa.
Paragraphs 8 - 20 summarize the status of FTAs. Comment
follows. End Summary.
Overall Strategy Unclear but Easy FTAs Come First
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶3. (SBU) Asked to comment on press reports in early 2006
that indicated that Minister Bo planned to conclude nine
FTAs covering twenty-seven countries, Ms. Wang Jingning,
Deputy Director (Division II) of the Department of
International Trade and Economic Affairs (DITEA) at MOFCOM
confirmed that an ambitious FTA agenda exists. She
clarified, however, that several of the previously
announced bilateral negotiations have already concluded
initial "Early Harvest" multi-round talks with tariff
reductions being implemented this year. Two regional
agreements (ASEAN and the Gulf Cooperation Council) cover
sixteen countries. According to an Australian Embassy
official based in Beijing, Australia has not set a
timetable for concluding an FTA this year.
¶4. (SBU) While a focus on ASEAN is a strategic initiative
for China's expansive trade agenda (the five ASEAN members
accounted for 8 percent of total PRC trade in 2005), China
has not announced plans for several countries that are
large and growing trade partners (Brazil, India and
Russia). Both Brazilian and Indian embassy officials based
BEIJING 00009501 002 OF 006
in Beijing have stated that FTA talks are highly unlikely
in the near term. Countries that account for far smaller
trade with China are actively engaged in negotiations
(Chile, Pakistan and New Zealand). According to Ms. Zhang
Bin, Deputy Director (Division I) of MOFCOM's DITEA,
China's criteria for launching FTA negotiations are good
political relations, an increasing trend in trade and a
large potential market.
¶5. (SBU) Several Latin American diplomats based in Beijing
have commented that the China-Chile FTA, which was
negotiated relatively easily, is not an apt model for the
rest of the region. These diplomats believe that it would
be harder for their countries to agree on tariff reductions
for Chinese products that would not hurt their domestic
producers. DITEA's Zhang commented that Chile initiated
talks on the FTA with China at an APEC meeting (see reftel
B). Since China's basic criteria were met, negotiations
moved quickly.
China's FTA Negotiations Focusing on Goods
------------------------------------------
¶6. (SBU) China's recent FTA agreements have tended to focus
on trade in goods followed by services and investment (e.g.
Chile, ASEAN and GCC). According to MOFCOM officials, the
goods component is most easily negotiated. Services and
investment agreements, they contend, are more complicated
and take longer to complete. The Australian FTA
discussions, however, include goods, services, and
investment (the outcome of arduous discussions according to
an Australian diplomat based in Beijing). Australian
officials are uncertain whether negotiations will in fact
follow the Memorandum of Understanding guidelines
established for the FTA talks with China (see para 16-18).
Organizational Limits on an Aggressive FTA Agenda
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶7. (SBU) According to Deputy Director Wang Jingning of
MOFCOM DITEA Division II, two DITEA divisions with a staff
of 20 persons are responsible for most FTA negotiations.
Many of these 20 DITEA officials are relatively junior with
limited trade negotiating experience. Division One covers
Chile, the GCC and Pakistan. Wang's division (Division
Two) covers ASEAN and New Zealand. Because of limited
DITEA staffing, responsibilities for FTA negotiations with
Australia were shifted to MOFCOM's Department of WTO
Affairs. (Note: The WTO Affairs Department was created at
about the time of China's 2001 WTO accession and, at least
initially, was largely staffed by officials formerly in
DITEA. End note.) DITEA and the WTO Affairs Department
both report to Vice Minister Yi Xiaozhun. Deputy Director
BEIJING 00009501 003 OF 006
Wang and her colleagues expressed strong interest in USG
FTA talks with South Korea and in USG staffing size for FTA
negotiation delegations and support.
Summary of FTA Agreements and Status
------------------------------------
¶8. (U) Chinese FTA negotiators divide their negotiations
into three phases. First the negotiators engage in "Early
Harvest" talks that focus on tariff reductions on
relatively non-controversial goods that can be implemented
quickly. Recent Early Harvest agreements were launched and
implemented within two years. The next phase is the
launching of "Normal" negotiations which involve goods and
services that require more effort. Lastly the negotiators
tackle "Sensitive" track items which include the most
contentious goods, services and investment sectors.
According to Wang, the Chinese Government attempts to limit
the number of goods placed on sensitive lists in FTA
negotiations in two ways. First, the total value of
sensitive items should not exceed ten percent of total
goods traded bilaterally based on 2001 statistics. Second,
the sensitive list should include no more than 500 items at
the harmonized schedule (six-digit tariff line) level.
¶9. (SBU) Tariff reductions on a wide variety of goods with
Chile, Pakistan, and ten countries in Southeast Asia (the
ASEAN-5: Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and the
Philippines; CLMV: Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam; and
Brunei) will come into effect in 2006. MOFCOM officials
initially expected to conclude agreements in goods with New
Zealand, Australia and the GCC by the end of 2006, but now
believe it may take a bit longer. Chinese Premier Wen
Jiabao recently announced that he expects an agreement with
Australia in the next one to two years (see para 16-18).
Wang stated that FTA feasibility studies are now underway
with Iceland and South Africa. If the outcomes of the
feasibility studies are positive, MOFCOM could begin "Early
Harvest" negotiations within one year, Wang said.
ASEAN
-----
¶10. (SBU) An Early Harvest Agreement on Trade in Goods was
signed in November, 2004 with tariff reduction on 7,000
eight-digit tariff-line items beginning July, 2005. By
2010 ninety percent of tariffs are to be eliminated.
Negotiations on trade in services and on investment are
ongoing. This is the most significant Early Harvest
Agreement China has concluded to date.
Chile
-----
BEIJING 00009501 004 OF 006
¶11. (U) China and Chile signed an "Early Harvest" agreement
in November, 2005 with tariff reductions to begin in July,
¶2006. Ninety-seven percent of tariffs are to be eliminated
by 2015. Subsequent negotiations are expected. According
to previous reporting (see reftel D) the FTA focused only
on goods to accelerate conclusion of this agreement.
Pakistan
--------
¶12. (U) Targeted tariff reductions on three thousand
products began in April, 2006, one year after the "Early
Harvest" Agreement was signed. Within two years 1,000
tariffs are to be eliminated entirely.
Hong Kong and Macau
-------------------
¶13. (SBU) Ongoing discussions regarding trade
liberalization continue. The mainland is interested in
increasing tourism opportunities. No timeframe for
formalization of agreements has been set, according to
MOFCOM officials.
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)
------------------------------
¶14. (SBU) The GCC includes Saudi Arabia, United Arab
Emirates, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, and Qatar. The UAE is the
2006 chair of the group which rotates yearly. Three trade
negotiation rounds have been conducted as of early May
¶2006. Saudi Embassy Charge Maghrabi told Econoffs that he
expects China and Saudi Arabia to conclude an agreement in
goods only (no energy items) by the end of 2006. Mr. Cao
Jiachang, Director in MOFCOM's West Asia Department, said
the FTA talks with Saudi Arabia were progressing smoothly.
¶15. (SBU) The third round of negotiations was held in
January, 2006 and covered custom inspections and sanitary
and phytosanitary (SPS) trade remedies. Previous rounds
were conducted in June, 2005 (trade and economy, investment
protection, establishing a Joint Commission on Commerce and
Trade) and April, 2005 (trade in goods, tariffs,
intellectual property rights and technology transfer).
Australia
---------
¶16. (SBU) According to an Australian embassy official in
Beijing, Premier Wen's remarks during his recent visit to
Australia regarding conclusion of an FTA within one to two
years were encouraging. The Chinese and Australians are
BEIJING 00009501 005 OF 006
currently engaged in quarterly discussions on their FTA and
thirty Australian negotiators are expected to arrive in
Beijing on May 22nd for the fifth round of talks. Goals
for this round include agreement on the text of the FTA.
¶17. (SBU) The Fourth Round, completed in Canbera in March,
2006, produced a Memorandum of Uderstanding for
"comprehensive" negotiations including goods, services, and
investments. This was the hardest point to come to
agreement on, according to this Australian Embassy
official, since the Chinese preferred to discuss only
goods, leaving trade and investment to an unspecified time
in the future. The Australian Government has not committed
itself to a specific timetable. Based on Embassy Canberra
reporting (see reftel C) there is some doubt on the part of
an Australian trade negotiator as to whether China will
indeed follow through on a comprehensive negotiation.
¶18. (SBU) The March 2006 MOU established the completion
date for the feasibility study period and also included
Australian recognition of China's full market economy
status. (Note: Australia thereby gave up seeking recourse
to sections 15 and 16 of the Protocol of Accession of the
PRC to the WTO and paragraph 242 of the WTO Report of the
Working Party on the Accession of China. China has been
pushing for this recognition, because it limits anti-
dumping actions that can be initiated by its trade
partners. End note.)
New Zealand
-----------
¶19. (SBU) According to the New Zealand Deputy Chief of
Mission in Beijing, the fifth round of negotiations went
well. The Chinese negotiating team was technically
oriented and very interested in formalizing an agreement
(See ref E for another account.) Trade in goods and
intellectual property rights are the main issues being
discussed. They are exploring establishment of a Joint
Commission on Commerce and Trade (JCCT) similar to the
USG's JCCT but are meeting resistance from the Chinese.
New Zealand officials are under significant pressure from
NZ businesses to have an IPR-related mechanism to resolve
disputes, according to a New Zealand Embassy Economic
Official.
Iceland and South Africa
------------------------
¶20. (SBU) China has begun preliminary feasibility studies
with no set timetable for Iceland and South Africa. Asked
why these two countries with minimal trade relations would
be chosen, DITEA Deputy Director Wang surmised that those
BEIJING 00009501 006 OF 006
countries had approached China, seeking more access to
China's large and growing market.
Comment
--------
¶21. (SBU) Comment: While China's historically large
trading partners fall outside of Minister Bo's free trade
agreement agenda for 2006, China is pursuing a steady trade
liberalization plan. These early "wins" give the trade
negotiating teams more experience on relatively easier
agreements as they tentatively approach larger trade
partners. Recent Chinese discussions with Russia, Brazil
and India did not include formal FTA negotiations but
rather laid the groundwork for future exchanges and formal
dialogues. For China, the FTAs also offer more political
dividends and fewer costs than pushing forward in
multilateral fora like the WTO Doha Development Round
multilateral trade liberalization negotiations. It is
likely that China's attempts to negotiate future FTAs will
be more difficult and will take longer than their earlier
agreements. End Comment.
RANDT