

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08USEUBRUSSELS1716, EU INFORMAL DEFMIN MEETING, DEAUVILLE, AND EU
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08USEUBRUSSELS1716.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08USEUBRUSSELS1716 | 2008-11-10 06:06 | 2011-04-24 00:12 | CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN | USEU Brussels |
VZCZCXYZ0011
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHBS #1716/01 3150615
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 100615Z NOV 08
FM USEU BRUSSELS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC
INFO RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN
RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS
RUEHVJ/AMEMBASSY SARAJEVO
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RHMFISS/SACEUR SD SHAPE BE
RUEKJCS/CJCS WASHINGTON DC
RHMFITT/CDR USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
C O N F I D E N T I A L USEU BRUSSELS 001716
NOFORN
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/07/2018
TAGS: MARR MOPS MCAP EUN FI
SUBJECT: EU INFORMAL DEFMIN MEETING, DEAUVILLE, AND EU
STRATEGIC PLANNING CAPABILITY: A FINNISH VIEW
Classified By: USEU/POL M-C Chris Davis, for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (C/NF) SUMMARY: Finnish Defense Counselor (protect)
discussed with USEU Defense Advisor the October 1 EU's
Informal Defense Ministers' Meeting at Deauville, and a
UK-France-Germany proposal for an EU crisis management and
planning capability. On capabilities, the French presidency
views its capability goals as paramount. They are: European
Air Transport Fleet, helicopters, maritime counter-mine
warfare, maritime aviation, military space activities, and
the relationship between the EDA and OCCAR. Ministers
discussed, with the participation of the NATO Secretary
General, the challenges of creating and maintaining
multinational high-readiness forces and of generating the
political will to use them. The necessity of U.S. support
for operations was also discussed. Ministers reviewed
current EU operations in Bosnia, Chad and off the coast of
Somalia. Finland supports a minimalist approach in Bosnia
and will send troops to a UN operation in Chad. Ministers
drew no conclusions on the juridical challenges
of anti-piracy operations. Finally, our Finnish source was
surprised that ministers did not take up a UK-FR-GE proposal
to develop, under Council General Secretariat, a
civil-military strategic planning structure, which he
described in detail. END SUMMARY
---------------------------
Capabilities la Franaise
---------------------------
¶2. (C/NF) Janne Kuusela (protect), Finnish Defense
Counselor, reading from Finnish reporting cables, told us the
Deauville meeting was unusually dynamic and interesting, not
the normal recitation of goals. The Chief Executive of the
EDA, Alex Weis, made the initial presentation delineating
European priorities derived from the Capability Development
Plan. Weis was then, according to Finnish reporting,
humiliated by the French, who downplayed the EDA's effort and
insisted that the capability goals of the French presidency
were paramount. The French made no mention of the Capability
Development Plan's conclusions nor the fact that these same
ministers had endorsed those conclusions previously. The
French cited their well-known preference for the European Air
Transport Fleet (Kuusela was skeptical this would ever fly),
helicopters, counter-mine warfare in the littoral waters of
Europe, maritime aviation, military space activities, and the
relationship between the EDA and OCCAR, the French hope being
that the
latter would act as a procurement agency for the former.
--------------------------------
Battlegroups: Use it or lose it
--------------------------------
¶3. (C/NF) Kuusela described a robust and useful discussion
at Deauville about the use of EU Battlegroups. After the
Finnish MoD's suggestion that the EU use its Battlegroups or
lose them, the UK intervened to say that it agreed, but that
HMG felt the EU should first discuss whether it ever intended
to engage in major military operations. The UK also pointed
out the very useful transformational aspects of developing
and establishing a Battlegroup. Poland interjected that the
Battlegroup is a Rolls-Royce of rapid reaction that is best
kept in the garage until a sufficiently important operation
warrants its use. Romania said it preferred to get its
transformational benefits from participation in NATO's NRF.
France thought that the EuroCorps was too often overlooked
for operations. The Chairman of the EU Military Committee,
French General Henri Bentgeat, then said that there are a
great many multi-national formations not affiliated with the
EU and that any discussion of their use must take NATO's need
int
o account as well. Further, he said merely establishing a
Battlegroup, especially if it is not used, is too costly as
50% of the cost of a high-readiness unit is just in getting
it ready. Next, it was suggested that the Battlegroup fill
the role as the EU's strategic reserve for operations.
General Bentgeat felt that if the situation warranted the
use of a Battlegroup, then the political will to employ it
would be forthcoming. The real problems of political will
aside, the UK re-iterated the need for the transformational
benefit in capability and mentality that come through the
process of standing up a Battlegroup.
----------------------------
The U.S. as Military Partner
----------------------------
¶4. (C/NF) According to the Finnish Defense Counselor, the
NATO Secretary General, who for the first time attended the
entire ministerial -- fulfilling a French proposal --
remarked that within NATO a similar discussion was under way
with respect to the NRF. Importantly, he reportedly
challenged ministers by asking if Europe or NATO really
contemplated conducting a significant military operation
without the participation of the United States. He said NATO
could not employ the NRF without the U.S. wondering if the EU
could employ a Battlegroup in an emergency without U.S.
assistance. General Bentgeat, reportedly noting the
"wisdom" of the NATO Secretary General's words, discussed the
lessons learned from the Nordic Battelgroup experience. He
cited the lack of lift and political will, and also the
failure to agree on costs, noting that the EU has still not
decided whether rapid reaction operations would be commonly
funded.
----------------
To Catch a Thief
----------------
¶5. (C/NF) Ministers also discussed a French proposal on
maritime surveillance and evacuation (NFI) and were briefed
on the French operation to rescue the crew of the private
yacht seized off Somalia. According to reporting from which
Kuusela was reading, the French paid the ransom at sea and
then using UAVs, helicopters, and other electronic means
tracked the pirates to land at which point the apparently
very numerous pirates split up and headed out in a great many
directions, too many in fact for the French to follow and
intercept. The result was that most of the ransom money was
lost and few of the pirates were apprehended.
----------
Operations
----------
¶6. (C/NF) Somalia: Kuusela related conversations among EU
naval planners at the ministerial who first estimated the
size of the EU's operational area as 300 square nautical
miles, which all thought was well beyond the capacity of a
few ships to patrol, given the small size of the pirate
dinghies. Then the estimate was raised to 500 square
nautical miles to the chagrin of those present. Ministers,
he said, also discussed the well-known list of practical and
juridical issues related to dealing with pirates without
coming to any conclusions, to include the inability to put
them ashore into the hands of a functioning police and
judicial system in Somalia, and the difficulty of identifying
them as pirates in the first place, since they usually claim
to be well-armed fisherman.
¶7. (C/NF) Chad: Relief by a UN operation is imperative,
concluded ministers from six nations, including Finland,
which promised to commit troops to a UN effort. Kuusela said
that current Finnish commitments to UN operations
post-Lebanon needed to be increased and Finland was
positioning itself for key positions in the UN hierarchy;
therefore, offering Finnish troops to a new UN operation in
Chad would have other benefits as well. Now that the rainy
season is coming to a close, he anticipated an increase in
rebel and bandit activity, while remarking that "Sweden left
us during the rainy season."
¶8. (C/NF) Bosnia: Kuusela said Finland favors the least
robust option of all those under consideration for reducing
the size of the EU force in Bosnia, because of the resource
drain of ALTHEA on other commitments. Kuusela added that the
consensus moved quickly in this direction.
-----------------------------
EU OHQ: In the Planning Stage
-----------------------------
¶9. (C/NF) Kuusela next discussed a UK-FR-GE proposal on a
structure for military strategic planning in Brussels that he
had thought would be discussed in Deauville. He reported
that the discussion did not take place as planned, presumably
because President Sarkozy considers the matter to be too
important a decision for defense ministers, preferring to
announce it at December's European Council meeting of Heads
of State and Government.
-----------------
UK-French Win-Win
-----------------
¶10. (C/NF) In laying out the proposal, Kuusela said that it
had to be a tri-partite one in order to gain the necessary
support, but that the Germans were merely bystanders.
(COMMENT: The original Battlegroup proposal was developed in
a similar fashion with the French bringing the Germans in at
the last minute END COMMENT) Kuusela said the effort was to
find a way forward in which the British, who did not object
in principle to strategic or advanced planning at the
European level, and the French, who want a stand-alone
structure at the strategic level in Brussels, could find
common ground. The British proposed a comprehensive
civilian-military center on the compound at SHAPE that could
integrate the work of both the EU and NATO; a proposal
Kuusela believed had U.S. support. The French objected as
this idea did not give France something in Brussels with a
European label. Kuusela's Finnish reporting said that a
UK-French agreement was reached in mid-late September;
however, the Elyse and Whitehall still disagree on some of
the details. The accord calls for a strategic
military-civilian planning and coordination function, with an
emphasis on coordination, under Javier Solana in the Council
General Secretariat. This mechanism is designed to produce
rapid strategic assessments to inform the EU decision-making
process in Brussels, while respecting the chain of command.
The proposal would not add any new billets, personnel or
structure in Brussels (presumably a win for the UK position),
but would enable the EU to function more effectively as a
unitary actor at the strategic political and strategic
military levels within the EU (a win for France).
--------------------------------------------
EU Crisis Management and Planning Capability
--------------------------------------------
¶11. (C/NF) Within the Secretariat and under Solana's Terms
of Reference, the new structure will combine DG E VIII,
Defense Aspects of ESDP, with DG E IX, Civilian Aspects of
ESDP, with the EU Military Staff, the Civilian Planning and
Conduct Capability (CPCC) and the Planning and Early Warning
Unit. According to our discussion with Kuusela, the new
structure will lean heavily on the Situation Center (SitCen)
and the relevant offices of the External Relations
Directorate General of the European Commission. The role of
the NATO Permanent Liaison Team to the EU Military Staff in
this arrangement is to be determined, as are permanent links
to NATO's strategic planning staff. This organization will
also have a Deployable Augmentee Cadre, a body of experts
that would detach itself in times of crisis to the
responsible organization, for example, to a framework
nation's Operational Headquarters (OHQ). The Military
Committee and the Civilian Committee will remain as advisory
bodies according to their current functions.
---------------------------
Wind in Sarkozy's NATO Sail
---------------------------
¶12. (C/NF) The UK does not see this as a fundamental change
in the intent of having a Council General Secretariat for
ESDP, but it will be a good way to put wind in the domestic
political sails of Sarkozy to help steer him back into NATO.
The French president will say, according to the Finns, that
this is a physically small change but a giant mental leap
forward.
SILVERBERG
.