

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 04BOGOTA1748, UNHCHR REPORT ON COLOMBIA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04BOGOTA1748.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
04BOGOTA1748 | 2004-02-20 17:05 | 2011-04-16 00:12 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Bogota |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
id: 14143
date: 2/20/2004 17:20
refid: 04BOGOTA1748
origin: Embassy Bogota
classification: CONFIDENTIAL
destination:
header:
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
----------------- header ends ----------------
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BOGOTA 001748
SIPDIS
GENEVA PLEASE PASS TO JEFF DELAURENTIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/19/2014
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL CO UNGA
SUBJECT: UNHCHR REPORT ON COLOMBIA
Classified By: Charge Milton Drucker for reasons 1.5 (b&d)
¶1. (C) Summary: The Office of the UN High Commissioner for
Human Rights (UNHCHR) in Colombia is finalizing its report
for Geneva on the GOC's compliance with its 27 human rights
recommendations. The report is likely to criticize the GOC
for slow and uneven implementation of the recommendations and
its refusal to implement two, or possibly three,
recommendations. Nevertheless, it will recognize that the
GOC fulfilled one recommendation, accomplished substantial
progress in another, and achieved varying progress in half a
dozen others. A group of foreign missions seeking to help
the GOC fulfill the recommendations believes that UNHCHR's
compliance assessment may give the GOC insufficient credit on
several recommendations, and has encouraged the GOC to draft
its own assessment for distribution in Geneva. End Summary.
¶2. (C) The Colombia office of the UN High Commissioner for
Human Rights (UNHCHR), under director Michael Fruhling, is
putting the finishing touches on its evaluation of the GOC's
compliance with 27 human rights recommendations made in the
office's 2002 human rights report and issued in March 2003.
The office will make public in early March its official
report on the recommendations, prior to the UN Human Rights
Commission's annual meeting in Geneva. In meetings with
foreign embassies, Fruhling has criticized the GOC for
waiting too long to engage seriously on implementing the
recommendations and for its uneven commitment to them. The
Ministry of Defense and Office of the Prosecutor General
(&Fiscalia8) have been particular laggards, he maintains.
Of the 27 recommendations, 20 are directed at the executive
branch, four at the independent Fiscalia, and three at
illegal armed groups. According to Fruhling, the executive
branch has fulfilled one recommendation, accomplished
substantial progress in a second, achieved varying progress
in half a dozen others, and rejected two or three.
¶3. (C) Fruhling intends to propose in Geneva that the UNHCHR
be given a mandate to develop a second set of
recommendations, drawn from the current 27, that would guide
his office's work for the next 12 months. Colombian Vice
president Francisco Santos, who has the lead on human rights
within the GOC, would prefer to discard the current set of
recommendations and replace them with more general goals that
would allow greater operational flexibility. According to
Santos, the current recommendations place too much emphasis
on taking bureaucratic steps and not enough on addressing
fundamental human rights problems.
¶4. (C) The European Union and some individual European
countries have emphasized the need for the GOC to comply
fully with the 27 recommendations, in some cases putting such
a premium on compliance with the recommendations that they
overlook real improvements achieved by the Uribe
administration in reducing violence and human rights crimes
in Colombia. Many Colombian human rights NGOs critical of
Uribe and his Government have vociferously advanced the view
that the GOC's uneven compliance with the recommendations
demonstrates a lack of commitment to human rights.
¶5. (C) To assist the GOC with the implementation of the
recommendations, seven embassies accredited to Colombia --
Brazil, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK
and the U.S. -- have formed an informal working group known
locally as the G-7. Over the last two months, G-7
representatives have met with Fruhling and Santos, both
separately and together. Predictably, these meetings have
highlighted differences between the GOC's and UNHCHR's
assessments of the Government's compliance with several of
the recommendations.
¶6. (C) Although Fruhling has declined to share an advanced
draft of his report to Geneva with G-7 ambassadors, he
provided the following oral snapshot to them on February 13:
--The GOC has fulfilled the recommendation on anti-personnel
mines (13).
--The GOC has achieved significant progress in improving the
effectiveness of the Early Warning System (1).
--The GOC has made some, but still insufficient, progress in:
protecting human rights defenders (2); increasing protection
for communities at risk (4); implementing human rights
training at the Ministry of Defense (8); and improving the
public security forces' adherence to international
humanitarian law (12). (Note: The Embassy believes the
UNHCHR report will give insufficient weight to the
Government's extension of state presence throughout the
country and success at reducing key indicators of violence,
including against human rights defenders and communities at
risk. Virtually all the G-7 ambassadors criticized Fruhling
for not giving the GOC more credit for the Ministry of
Defense's human rights training. Public security personnel
continue to commit only a small fraction of human rights
violations. End note.)
--The GOC has not assigned personnel from the Inspector
General's ("Procuraduria") and Ombudsman's ("Defensoria")
offices to all conflictive areas (5), although international
funding had helped the GOC assign such personnel to many
remote and problematic regions. (Note: Fruhling gives the
GOC insufficient credit for having representatives of the
Ombudsman's office in all 33 of Colombia's departments. End
note.)
--The Vice President has established a Special Committee (20)
to advance investigations and prosecutions in select human
rights cases, but progress in closing cases has been too
slow. (Note: The GOC had significantly advanced six of the
one-hundred cases by the end of 2003, and hopes to have
advanced another 15 cases by the end of February. End note.)
--Although the GOC is negotiating with several paramilitary
organizations, neither the FARC nor the ELN are prepared to
enter into dialogue with the Government. It is essential
that the GOC's negotiations with illegal armed groups be
guided by principles of truth, justice, and reparations (14).
--The Inspector General ("Procuraduria") has not taken
disciplinary actions against all state employees who in any
way jeopardized the work of human rights defenders (6). In
this regard, some public pronouncements from senior GOC
officials have been unhelpful.
--Although President Uribe has been clear on the need to
sever the public security forces' links with paramilitaries
(21), more actions need to be taken
--The GOC has begun preparing a national plan of action on
human rights (23), but has not given local governments and
key sectors of society (read human rights NGOs) necessary
input.
--There have been positive discussions with the Ministry of
Education on incorporating human rights education in the
national curriculum (24) and providing human rights training
to judicial entities (25), but little concrete progress has
been achieved.
--Although the Vice President's Office has worked
productively with UNHCHR, the GOC as a whole has not taken
sufficient advantage of the office's human rights expertise
(26 and 27).
--The GOC faces a major challenge in developing policies to
narrow the economic inequality gap in Colombia (22).
--The Ministry of Defense is resisting the requirement to
suspend from duty public security force personnel implicated
in serious human rights violations (19) by relying on what
Fruhling believes is an erroneous reading of relevant legal
codes.
--The GOC made it clear, at the July 2003 London Conference
and subsequently, its disagreement with recommendations
calling for it not to adopt anti-terrorism legislation giving
the military arrest powers (15) and for the independent
Inspector General's Office ("Procuraduria") to inspect
military intelligence files on human rights defenders and
publish the results (7). Fruhling maintains that the GOC
agreed to these recommendations in March 2003 at Geneva, and
is therefore bound. (Note: The Colombian Congress approved
an anti-terrorism statute in December and will consider
implementing legislation next session. The UNHCHR is
exploring with the Defense Ministry a possible compromise on
the review of military intelligence files. End note.)
--The Prosecutor General's Office ("Fiscalia") only signed in
November an agreement to work with UNHCHR, so no concrete
results have been achieved on recommendations 3, 16, 17, and
¶18.
¶7. (C) During the past week, however, a majority of G-7
representatives concluded at meeting with Fruhling that
UNHCHR gives the GOC insufficient credit for compliance with
some of the recommendations and that in others it demands
that the GOC go beyond the language of the recommendations.
In particular, the Dutch and Swedish Ambassadors, who are
among the most conspicuous champions of human rights within
the local diplomatic community, openly questioned whether
Fruhling has been excessively demanding in his assessments of
GOC compliance.
¶8. (C) On February 18, Vice President Santos met with G-7
ambassadors and excoriated the draft report Fruhling had
shown him. He said that the report was highly inaccurate in
key sections; the GOC could accept damning assessments, but
they should at least be accurate. Santos claimed that he
"did not know how to show the draft report to President
Uribe." He asked for advice.
¶9. (C) The Brazilian ambassador urged Santos to produce a
GOC drafted human rights report, noting progress where
warranted but admitting shortfalls, for the UN Human Rights
Committee meeting in Geneva. She was supported by the other
G-7 ambassadors present. The G-7 group then met at the Swiss
embassy without Santos and came to the same conclusion. No
one had much confidence, including the Swedish ambassador,
that Fruhling would modify his report before sending it as a
draft to Geneva. Subsequently, the Swedish ambassador
privately indicated to us that he is considering recommending
that the GOS question the draft report's assessments in
Geneva -- which would be a surprising development, given that
Fruhling is a former Swedish diplomat.
¶10. (C) Comment: The more critical stance of the G-7
ambassadors regarding certain aspects of the UNHCHR Colombia
office's report may not translate into a willingness to
criticize it in Geneva. It has, however, put Fruhling on
notice that he runs such a risk. End Comment.
Butenis
=======================CABLE ENDS============================