

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08WELLINGTON388, WHY THE LABOUR PARTY LOST THE NZ ELECTION
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08WELLINGTON388.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08WELLINGTON388 | 2008-11-17 04:04 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO2365
RR RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0388/01 3220441
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 170441Z NOV 08
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5538
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1791
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5320
RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA 0509
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0757
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 WELLINGTON 000388
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM NZ
SUBJECT: WHY THE LABOUR PARTY LOST THE NZ ELECTION
WELLINGTON 00000388 001.2 OF 004
¶1. (SBU) Summary. Ever since John Key took the helm of
the National Party in December 2006, Helen Clark and
the Labour Party seemed flat, out of step, and headed
for defeat in the 2008 election. Economic issues were
at the forefront of voters' minds and National
convinced the electorate that it was better placed to
steer New Zealand forward in poor economic times as
well as adopt more pragmatic fiscal policies for the
majority of Kiwis. Voters questioned whether Labour's
legislative priorities mirrored public concerns. New
Zealand's growing law and order problems largely went
unaddressed by the Labour Government. Helen Clark's
continued support for embattled Foreign Minister
Winston Peters appeared more desperate than principled,
and the Labour Party's dirty tricks campaign also
signaled a party more interested in discrediting the
opposition than running on its record. Finally,
Labour's much-vaunted grassroots network in Auckland
failed to get out the vote, which had helped Labour win
the election in 2005. As the first step towards
recovery, new Labour leader Phil Goff has acknowledged
some of the party's missteps and promised to address
them. End Summary.
Pulled Down by the Faltering Economy
------------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) While Labour had made a number of policy
missteps in the lead up to the election, the economy
emerged as the most important issue for voters as
commodity prices rose and the international financial
crisis arrived at New Zealand's doorstep. Despite
presiding over the longest period of growth in a
generation, Labour went into the election with the
economy in recession and years of government debt ahead
for the foreseeable future. The Labour Government's
rollout of economic enticements just before the
election was ill-timed as voters wondered how the
government could pay for everything while the world
economy was in free fall (and also why the government
had not been generous earlier when budget surpluses
were plentiful). In a surprise move, the Government
announced that it would buy back the national rail
system at a cost of over NZD 1 billion, without any
public discussion or study period. The decision
appeared to many observers to be the Labour Party's way
of spending down any surplus discretionary funds so
that National would find an empty Treasury on coming
into office. National's long-standing platform of tax
cuts and greater fiscal prudence won voters over as
polls showed that the public trusted National more than
Labour to rebuild the economy and recalibrate the
government's tax and revenue base to move the country
forward.
¶3. (SBU) Deputy PM and Finance Minister Michael
Cullen resisted tax cuts for years, and this turned out
to be a key factor behind Labour's loss. As rising
commodity prices ate into household budgets over the
past year, Cullen danced around the issue of tax cuts
and criticized National's early call for tax cuts as
imprudent. With the economy in recession and families
strapped for cash, Cullen's belated tax cut
announcement was viewed as too little, too late. Many
voters saw it for the short-term bribe that it was --
and many remembered that Cullen had promised a tax cut
on the eve of the 2005 election, but then cancelled the
tax cut after Labour won the election. They suspected
this too would be a benefit that could easily evaporate
once Labour was assured of three more years in office.
Disconnect with the Public
--------------------------
¶4. (SBU) A central explanation behind Labour's loss of
support was a perceived disconnect with the greater
part of New Zealanders. Many of Labour's policy
decisions and its legislative agenda over the past
several years did not line up with the priorities of
most New Zealanders. Consequently, a good portion of
the electorate believed that Labour no longer
represented the interests of "ordinary" New Zealanders.
This perception was underscored by the Labour Party's
refusal to acknowledge New Zealanders' growing unease
over the rise in violent crime in the country. One of
WELLINGTON 00000388 002.2 OF 004
John Key's first major policy announcements in 2008
centered on National's proposals to address law and
order issues, and law enforcement groups welcomed the
policy proposals. In contrast, the Labour Government
argued that there was no problem to begin with, and
suggested that the media were simply reporting more
crime. Justice Minister Annette King also downplayed
any increase in crime in late 2007/early 2008, blaming
it on the hot weather.
Questionable Legislative Priorities
-----------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) A number of Labour policy decisions
underpinned Labour's disconnect with voters. Two
controversial pieces of legislation that the Labour-led
Government passed into law in 2007 stand out: the
'anti-smacking' (spanking) law and the deeply divisive
Electoral Finance Act. In response to growing concerns
regarding child abuse in New Zealand, Labour pushed
forward a bill promoted by its support partner, the
Green Party, which effectively banned parents from
spanking their children. The National Party gave
lukewarm backing to the bill, qualifying their support
by noting that if good parents were unduly targeted for
administering occasional corporal punishment, National
would rethink the law. However, many in the New
Zealand public viewed it as Labour taking away parental
rights and unnecessarily interfering in a family's
right to discipline its children. The law remains very
controversial, and a petition to overturn the law was
presented to Parliament before the election.
¶6. (SBU) The Electoral Finance Act (EFA) sparked one
of the biggest controversies in New Zealand politics in
¶2007. The purpose of the Act is to increase state
oversight of political activity and to restrict
unhealthy influence of wealthy interests. However, the
law received almost universal disapproval from New
Zealand's media and legal experts alike for being
unworkable, poor drafted, anti-democratic and conceived
to advantage Labour. Ironically, the political party
that was deemed to violate the EFA the most during the
recent election campaign was the Labour Party -- a
factoid gleefully proclaimed by the media.
Nanny State Under Labour
------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Throughout its nine years in power, Labour
was often criticized as having a 'Nanny State'
mentality - moving public policy into the realm of
legislating social behavior. The anti-spanking and
electoral finance laws were both perceived by much of
the population as government overreach in areas where
the government should stay out, e.g., parenting and
political expression. Labour reinforced this
perception in the weeks before the election when it
considered regulatory measures that would limit how
much water pressure New Zealanders could use in the
shower as a means to control energy costs. Call-in
radio show commentary indicated that the public viewed
it differently and PM Clark was forced to announce a
policy retreat.
Controversial Bedfellows
------------------------
¶8. (SBU) Although not part of the Labour-led
coalition government formed in 2005, the Green Party's
polling numbers in the lead up to the 2008 elections
increased the party's political profile as an
attractive post-election partner for Labour. To
attract Green Party support, Labour changed its
Emissions Trading Scheme legislation to accommodate
Green Party concerns. National accused Labour of
placing political expediency and Clark's desire for a
fourth term in office above the interests of the
country by passing ideologically-driven legislation.
Business leaders railed against the ETS as too costly
for a country the size of New Zealand, particularly as
the economy was already contracting. Amending the ETS
remains one of the priorities of the new National-led
government.
WELLINGTON 00000388 003.2 OF 004
¶9. (SBU) Clark's reluctance to distance herself from
scandal-ridden Foreign Minister Winston Peters when he
was engulfed in a political funding controversy
undoubtedly hurt her politically and served to
undermine a central theme of her election campaign:
trust. Only when Parliament censured Peters for
providing misleading statements did Clark direct him to
step down temporarily from his ministerial portfolios.
New Zealand voters recognized that Clark needed Peters'
New Zealand First party support, assuming his party
returned to Parliament, to govern. Revelations that
Clark knew more about the funding controversy than she
had admitted undermined her efforts to promote trust as
a central theme for the election. Prior incidents,
such as her signing a painting she herself did not
paint for a charity auction and misuse of taxpayers
money to fund advertising in the 2005 election, meant
that Clark and the Labour Party were seen by some
voters as not entirely honest.
Dirty Tricks
------------
¶10. (SBU) National's campaign throughout the election
period remained forward looking and geared to the
issues. Labour, on the other hand, ran negative
television and radio advertisements accusing National
of a secret agenda and hiding its real policies from
voters -- a tactic that had helped Labour in its 2005
campaign. While it may have swung a few percentage
points for Labour within the electorate this time, the
negativity may also have backfired as the
scaremongering had little impact on voters. Moreover,
the media lambasted Labour Party President Mike
Williams when he flew to Australia at taxpayer expense
to dig up dirt on National leader John Key over a
finance scandal dating back two decades -- for which
Key had already been cleared.
¶11. (SBU) A youth activist, while never linked
explicitly to the Labour Party, also made headlines
during the campaign for secretly taping conversations
with National Party senior leaders at a National Party
convention earlier in 2008 and then leaking them to the
media months later during the campaign for maximum
potential damage to National. Although mildly
embarrassing, none of the conversations convincingly
showed that National had a radical right-wing or secret
agenda that it was shielding from voters, and Labour's
continued references to the tapes looked increasingly
desperate.
Winds of Change
---------------
¶12. (SBU) After nine years of a Labour-led government,
the desire for change was strong among voters who had
witnessed the historic U.S. election just days earlier.
Many Labour MPs have been on the political scene for a
long time and despite attempts to rejuvenate its ranks,
Labour's senior, and most visible, cadre remains
essentially the same. In contrast, National Party
leader John Key is a relatively recent arrival in
Parliament and was not associated with previous
National governments or unpopular policies of the past.
National also introduced a number of fresh faces among
its rank and file, including women and ethnic
minorities. Labour, by comparison, was seen as tired
and old.
13 . (SBU) It could be argued that Labour's previous
election victories - 2002 and 2005 - were largely due
to the relative weakness of the opposition National
Party at those times. The 2008 version of the National
Party is considerably stronger and more unified than in
recent election years. Key has moved a sometimes
fractious party into the political center and presented
Clark's most formidable opponent since she become Prime
Minister in 1999. In the three head-to-head debates
between the two leaders it was Key who on balance came
out on top. Debating has been a particular strength of
Clark and her inability to best Key in this arena
damaged Labour in the lead up to the election.
Where Was South Auckland?
WELLINGTON 00000388 004.2 OF 004
-------------------------
¶14. (SBU) On election night, National Party
supporters resisted the urge to celebrate as the poll
results came in and remained largely unchanged
throughout the evening. As National had learned in
2005, the South Auckland vote (a traditional Labour
stronghold) could tip the balance for Labour and give
Clark a last-minute victory. However, even as the
Auckland votes were counted, the poll results and
overall party vote did not change. Media analysts
noted that the overall percentage of voter turnout was
the lowest in thirty years, and the South Auckland vote
was not nearly as strong in 2008 as in 2005. Labour
Party supporters had a much more difficult time
motivating voters to get out this year -- the reasons
for which are still not entirely clear.
Comment
-------
¶15. (SBU) In the year before the election, the polls,
call-in radio shows, and the media continually said
that the once formidable Labour Party machine, the
Government, and even PM Helen Clark seemed tired and
out of touch. That may explain, in part, why Labour
seemed inflexible in going against public will in
pursuit of policies that lacked broad public support.
The issues of greatest importance to voters -- the
economy and law and order -- were at the top of
National's list but largely ignored by Labour. Since
the election, the new Labour Party leadership has
acknowledged that Labour had lost the pulse of the
public, and new Labour Party leader Phil Goff has
promised a review of how there came to be a disconnect
with a significant proportion of the electorate.
McCormick