

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 03OTTAWA2376, GOC FEDERAL ROLE IN THE BATTLE AGAINST ALIEN INVASIVE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03OTTAWA2376.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
03OTTAWA2376 | 2003-08-21 12:12 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
211246Z Aug 03
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 OTTAWA 002376
SIPDIS
STATE FOR OES/ENV (ROSE), OES/ETC (ROTH), OES/OA, WHA/CAN
(NELSON, WHEELER)
EPA FOR OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS (CHRISTICH)
INTERIOR FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (GLOMAN)
INTERIOR FOR NATIONAL INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL STAFF (WILLIAMS)
INTERIOR (A. GORDON BROWN)
COMMERCE (DEAN WILKINSON)
STATE PLEASE PASS ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
AGRICULTURE (REBECCA BECH)
WHITE HOUSE FOR COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV TBIO ETRD CA
SUBJECT: GOC FEDERAL ROLE IN THE BATTLE AGAINST ALIEN INVASIVE
SPECIES
REF: OTTAWA 2225
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. An effective Canadian plan to deal with Alien Invasive Species
(AIS) will require close coordination between provincial and
federal governments, as well as renewed accountability and
collaboration between federal government departments. This cable
outlines the federal-provincial jurisdiction and federal
departmental mandates and roles. At the federal level, a variety
of legislative instruments are already in place that can be
employed to address AIS; and federal government departments have,
in their annual business plans, publicly stated their commitment
to dealing with AIS problems. We expect these existing federal
tools will be used more actively in the near term as GOC
departments seek to demonstrate to the incoming Prime Minister
that they are serious about AIS, and as a consequence gain
support for the nascent National Invasive Species Management and
Policy Framework (reftel). END SUMMARY.
----------
Background
----------
¶2. In an October 2002 Report, the Canadian Commissioner of the
Environment and Sustainable Development (CESD) devoted an entire
chapter to the pressing issue of alien invasive species (AIS).
The report noted that AIS are the 2nd leading cause of
biodiversity loss in Canada (after habitat destruction) and
inflict billions of dollars of damage to the economy every year.
In 1992, Canada signed the United Nations Convention on
Biological Diversity, which included a pledge to prevent and/or
control AIS. According to the Commissioner's report, however,
there has been no effective GOC action on AIS. Indeed, the report
found that, despite increasing numbers of invasive species
entering Canada and their growing destructive influence, federal
government efforts to deal with this issue remain in disarray,
with "no clear understanding... who will do what to respond."
---------------------------------------
Federal-Provincial Jurisdictional Split
---------------------------------------
¶3. Invasive species involve an expansive category of environmental
responsibilities apportioned between the various levels of
government in Canada. The federal and provincial governments
share jurisdiction for the protection of the environment
according to the distribution of their legislative powers as
described in the Canadian Constitution. For example, federal
agencies such as Transport Canada and the Department of Fisheries
and Oceans (DFO) have authority on environmental issues relating
to: inter-provincial and international transportation and
communication; navigation and shipping; and sea coast and inland
fisheries. On the other hand, management of public lands and
wildlife, considered "natural resources," come under provincial
jurisdiction and responsibilities. On some issues, such as
agriculture, the Canadian Constitution gives concurrent
jurisdiction to Ottawa and the provinces.
¶4. Clearly, for a coordinated nationwide approach to AIS, both the
federal and provincial levels of government must be involved.
However, the federal agencies usually have a role to play
whenever provincial borders are crossed; thus the federal
agencies are best positioned to take the lead in coordinating an
overarching national plan. The focus of this cable is,
therefore, on describing the mandates and activities of key
federal departments with a stake in the AIS issue. We intend to
provide a description of provincial activities and
responsibilities in future reporting on this issue.
------------------
Environment Canada
------------------
¶5. Environment Canada (EC) (www.ec.gc.ca) is the coordinating federa
department in the development of a national invasive species
strategy. The Department of the Environment Act establishes EC's
authority over "all matters relating to the preservation and
enhancement of the quality of the natural environment," making it
the natural choice to play a central role in any AIS effort.
The mandate includes "the enforcement of rules and regulations
arising from the advice of the International Joint Commission
relating to boundary waters" and entitles EC to deal with
questions arising between the US and Canada related to
environmental quality.
¶6. Within EC, the Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS) handles the
federal government's responsibilities on wildlife issues,
including protecting nationally important wildlife habitat
and conducting scientific research. Of key significance,
the CWS, with the assistance of other federal departments
and provincial and territorial wildlife agencies,
administers the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and
Regulation of Inter-provincial and International Trade Act
(WAPPRIITA). WAPPRIITA regulates the movement of wild
species to and from Canada and within its provinces and
territories in order to "protect Canadian ecosystems from
the introduction of harmful wild species." According to
Robert McLean, Acting Director General, Conservation
Strategies Directorate of EC, WAPPRIITA was designed
expressly for the purpose of allowing the government to
identify and place on a "prohibited" import list any species
that could be invasive if it were to establish itself in
Canada. Indeed, the House of Commons Standing Committee on
Fisheries and Oceans (SCOFO) has recommended that grass,
bighead, silver and black carp and any other aquatic alien
species deemed harmful to Canadian wildlife or ecosystems be
immediately listed in Schedule II (the prohibited list) of
the WAPPRITTA regulations in order to prohibit their
importation into Canada in a live state.
¶7. Environment Canada also administers the Canadian Environmental
Protection Act (CEPA) that provides a safety net for
government action on AIS. The Act provides the federal
cabinet the authority, subject to advice from the Federal-
Provincial Environment Ministers' Council, to regulate
"toxic substances". Under the Act a "substance" is "any
distinguishable kind of organic or inorganic matter, whether
animate or inanimate;" and "a substance is toxic if it is
entering or may enter the environment.under
conditions.having, or that may have an immediate or long-
term harmful effect on the environment.constituting.a danger
to the environment on which human life depends.or.to human
life or health."
----------------
Transport Canada
----------------
¶8. Transport Canada (TC) (www.tc.gc.ca) works to maintain a Canadian
transportation system that, among other things, is
environmentally friendly. TC's Environmental Protection and
Sustainable Development efforts focus on ensuring the
department's compliance with applicable environmental laws and
regulations. They are also directed to the need for TC to assess
and address the impact its operations have on the environment.
TC's environmental impact would include the risk of importing AIS
along human and cargo transportation pathways. Currently TC's
main effort related to AIS concerns the arrival of AIS in ships'
ballast water (BW). BW is internationally recognized as one of
the most pernicious pathways for aquatic AIS and is presumed
responsible for the presence of zebra mussels in the Great Lakes,
one of the most well known cases of an invasive species in
Canada. TC has "the authority to regulate the control and
management of ballast water" in Canadian waters under the latest
series of amendments made in 1998 to the Canadian Shipping Act.
¶9. According to the 2002 assessment by the CESD, however, TC, despite
having a clear statutory mandate, "does not regulate ballast
water discharges; nor does it monitor or report on compliance
with existing guidelines." The CESD also noted that "Canada
relies exclusively on US inspection and enforcement" of BW
practices in the Great Lakes and that "there is no official
arrangement between Transport Canada and the US authorities to co-
operate on inspection or enforcement or to exchange information."
Furthermore, the report points out that TC does not intend to
apply planned mandatory BW regulations from its sustainable
development strategy to Canada's coasts, leaving some areas open
to new AIS. TC has responded to the CESD criticisms by stating
that it relies on the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO)
"to identify criteria that could form the basis of an effective
ballast water regulation" and that these criteria have not yet
been forthcoming.
----------------------------------
Department of Fisheries and Oceans
----------------------------------
¶10. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) (www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca)
is charged with the support of economic, ecological, and
scientific interests in Canadian oceans and inland waters. DFO's
Fish Habitat Management Program "plays a pivotal role in the
conservation and protection of fish habitat in Canada" supported
by its enforcement of the related provisions in the Fisheries
Act. The Fisheries Act, Coastal Fisheries Protection Act, and
Fish Inspection Act could enable DFO to prohibit and monitor the
possession or release into the wild of potentially harmful
aquatic AIS. The House of Commons SCOFO determined in its May
2003 report on aquatic AIS that DFO "has the jurisdiction and the
legislative authority under section 43 of the Fisheries Act to
ban the sale of... potentially invasive species of fish."
COMMENT: This recommendation may seem redundant in the face of
WAPPRIITA's Schedule II list of potentially harmful species
illegal to import. It appears, however, that DFO, under the
Fisheries Act, can prohibit the sale of these fish species
anywhere in the country, regardless of their movement into, out
of, or within Canada. END COMMENT.
¶11. In its response to the CESD Report of April 2002, DFO committed
to "take the lead role with respect to the portion of the
national action plan that deals with aquatic invasive species."
It expects to have defined science priorities for researching and
addressing the threat of aquatic AIS by fall 2003. It remains to
be seen how ballast water management fits in to these DFO
priorities. It told the CESD: "it is not responsible for
developing science-based criteria that could form the basis of a
ballast water regulation. This, of course, contradicts TC's
position (para. 9) and illustrates the challenges of overlapping
jurisdictions and responsibilities.
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------
Canadian Food Inspection Agency & Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------
¶12. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)
(www.inspection.gc.ca), which reports to the Minister of
Agriculture and Agri-Food, conducts all Canadian federal food,
animal, and plant health inspection programs. It committed to
addressing the threat of invasive species in its 2000 plan for a
national import strategy and testifies to continued collaboration
with other federal agencies on AIS in its 2003-2008 Corporate
Business Plan. Since its inception in 1997, the CFIA has been
the agency of implementation for some of Agriculture and Agri-
Food Canada's policies and laws, including the Plant Protection
Act and the Seeds Act (see paras 13 and 14).
¶13. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) (www.agr.gc.ca), as well
as the provincial agricultural ministries, have been conducting
operations against AIS in one form or another for decades.
Maintaining environmental health in conjunction with agricultural
activity is part of AAFC's mandate. Its Agricultural Policy
Framework, developed in cooperation with provincial ministries of
agriculture, recognizes the need to preserve Canadian
biodiversity. A Canadian Wildlife Service report (1993) on
invasive plant species described the federal Seeds Act
(administered then by AAFC but now by the CFIA) to have "minimal
utility" for AIS control efforts, instead acting as a weak method
of prevention. (The report saw promise, however, in retooling
the Provincial Weed Acts to improve efforts to prevent, control,
or eradicate invasive species in Canada, via modifications to
these Acts to update and expand the list of target species,
enlarge the area of the laws' application, and increase
administrative resources for monitoring and enforcement.)
¶14. According to the Summary of Environmental Law in North America
prepared for the North American Commission for Environmental
Cooperation (www.cec.org), the Plant Protection Act (PPA),
administered by the CFIA, is the most comprehensive piece of
Canadian federal legislation that is relevant to controlling and
combating AIS. The PPA is designed to protect the agricultural
and forestry sectors of the Canadian economy from pests. Through
this Act, the CFIA can potentially prevent the importation and
spread of AIS and control or eradicate established pest
infestations. It gives CFIA the authority to conduct
inspections, searches, and seizures of materials suspected of
harboring AIS. Except as permitted under the PPA's regulations,
"no person shall move, grow, raise, culture, or produce any thing
that there are reasonable grounds to believe is a pest, that is
or could be infected with a pest or that constitutes or could
constitute a biological obstacle to the control of a pest."
COMMENT: The AAFC, CFIA, and PPA are concerned primarily with
the safeguarding of Canadian agricultural interests against pests
of all types. Nevertheless, many AIS are included among these
harmful pests and the language of the PPA allows for
comprehensive measures to be put into place to protect against
importing new AIS and to control the spread of established AIS.
The umbrella the PPA sets up to protect certain economic
interests can shelter other interests, both economical and
environmental, against the harmful influence of AIS. End comment.
-----------------------
Canadian Forest Service
-----------------------
¶15. Canada is home to 10% of Earth's forests, which shelter about 2/
of plant and animal species in Canada. The Canadian Forest
Service (CFS) (www.nrcan-rncan.gc.ca/cfs-scf), part of Natural
Resources Canada, has federal responsibility for the state of
Canada's forests and it recognizes the increasing threat of AIS.
The Forestry Act is the legal basis for CFS, through the mandate
of the Minister of Natural Resources, to conduct "research
relating to the protection, management and utilization of the
forest resources of Canada" and to "establish and maintain
laboratories and other necessary facilities for those purposes."
One goal of the CFS's action plan "Biodiversity in the Forests"
is "to further the understanding of the impacts of forest
management... such as the introduction of exotic tree species"
and it identifies exotic pest species as a "key biodiversity
issue." NOTE: The CFS and Natural Resources Canada are absent
from most of the major documents detailing the GOC efforts on
AIS. While the Canadian Council of Forestry Ministers is playing
a role in the development of the national plan, the CFS does not
appear to have a central role in a national AIS strategy. Its
mandate in this matter appears to focus on research efforts
concerning the measure of biodiversity and taxonomy issues. The
CFS publication of "Alien Invaders in Canada's Waters, Wetlands,
and Forests" in the fall of 2002 provides a useful comprehensive
overview of AIS in Canada including invasion pathways, affected
sectors, management and control efforts, and national and
international collaboration on AIS, information on the
publication is available at the CFS website noted above. END
NOTE.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶16. Despite the absence of a comprehensive act or law addressing AIS
federal GOC agencies can effectively employ a number of
legislative tools in their efforts to curb environmental, social
and economic threats posed by invasive species. The Plant
Protection Act (PPA), in place since 1990, provides a general
framework for actions against exotic pest species, including the
establishment of inspection facilities, checkpoints, and the
authority of the inspectors to enforce regulations. The PPA's
broad focus lays the foundations for follow-up acts, such as
WAPPRIITA in 1992, to reinforce and further define efforts to
control AIS. DFO and Transport Canada have the mandate and the
resources to act quickly to protect against aquatic AIS under
such legislation as the Fisheries Act and the Canadian Shipping
Act. As documented in the SCOFO and CESD reports, explicit
action can be taken now to fight AIS, if these federal agencies
have the necessary will and can commit needed resources to the
task, as well as improve their level of cooperation. GOC
officials focusing on AIS know that their agencies must use these
existing tools expeditiously and effectively to gain credibility
for the nascent National Invasive Species Management and Policy
Framework (reftel). That "national strategy" is, in turn, an
essential first step for Canada in its progress toward a North
American strategy on AIS.
CELLUCCI