

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08QUITO1128, LAUNCH OF U.S.-ECUADOR BILATERAL DIALOGUE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08QUITO1128.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08QUITO1128 | 2008-12-08 16:04 | 2011-05-02 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Quito |
VZCZCXYZ0014
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHQT #1128/01 3431645
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 081645Z DEC 08
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9715
RHEFHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC 2243
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC 0613
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
INFO RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA PRIORITY 7870
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS PRIORITY 3297
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ DEC 1322
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA PRIORITY 2935
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL PRIORITY 3957
UNCLAS QUITO 001128
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
AID for AA/LAC Jose Cardenas and Tully Cornick
State pass USTR for Bennett Harman
NSC for John Herrmann and Bob King
Commerce for Lisa Martilotta
USDA for Amy Slusher
Treasury for Office of the Americas Luyen Tran
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL ETRD EINV ECON KJUS SNAR SMIG EC
SUBJECT: LAUNCH OF U.S.-ECUADOR BILATERAL DIALOGUE
REFTEL A: QUITO 696
B: STATE 101841
C: QUITO 1100
¶1. (U) Summary: A U.S. delegation led by WHA DAS Christopher
McMullen met with Ecuadorian officials in Quito November 24 to
launch the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral Dialogue, a forum to address
issues of interest to both sides and to highlight and build on
existing cooperation and positive engagement (ref A). The initial
Dialogue meeting addressed: the financial sector; investment;
customs; sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) issues; sustainable
development; combating narcotrafficking and money laundering;
trafficking in persons; and migration issues. The delegation heads
also met with Foreign Minister Maria Isabel Salvador, who endorsed
and supported the process. A follow-on meeting was agreed for
Washington in the second quarter of the calendar year, to be
preceded by the establishment of working groups on various issues to
be determined. End Summary.
¶2. (SBU) Led by State Department's Deputy Assistant Secretary
McMullen, the U.S delegation met with MFA officials November 24 to
launch officially the Dialogue. USAID Deputy Assistant
Administrator for Latin America and the Caribbean Tully Cornick,
USDA, DHS, and Commerce also participated. The Ecuadorian
delegation, led by Under Secretary for Bilateral Relations Carlos
Jativa, included representatives from trade, consular, competition,
security, agriculture, justice, migration, customs and antinarcotics
offices and agencies. Jativa welcomed the Dialogue as a way to
strengthen the bonds between the U.S. and Ecuador. Many Ecuadorian
agencies thanked the U.S. side for assistance and praised current
cooperation under the four pillars of the Dialogue: Human
Development and Poverty Reduction, Trade and Investment, Cooperation
and Technical Assistance, and Immigration Issues.
Human Development and Poverty Reduction
---------------------------------------
¶3. (U) The Ecuadorians presented detailed information on Plan
Ecuador (Ecuador's development plan for its northern region
bordering Colombia), and the GOE's priority interests in the region.
Plan Ecuador's four key sectors for investment include housing,
water and sewage systems, production chains, and improvement of
education. DAS McMullen commented that USAID has worked very
closely with the GOE on this plan, investing over $80 million since
2001, and will continue this positive cooperation.
¶4. (SBU) An official from Ecuador's Coordinating Ministry of
Economic Policy stressed the importance of Ecuador's need for
balanced internal development, improved competitiveness and
production, and an improved financial structure. He asked for U.S.
cooperation in sharing best practices and lessons learned on: the
Community Reinvestment Act (to offer credit to microentrepreneurs);
financial regulators like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; designing a
social security system and unemployment insurance; working with the
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta to inventory monetary instruments in
circulation; and cooperation and technical assistance from the
Securities Exchange Commission to design a new securities market.
¶5. (U) The U.S. delegation responded that the USG could share its
experiences, invited the GOE to participate in preparing for the
Summit of the Americas, which could include a discussion on the
financial sector, and suggested that experiences from the G-20
process could be applied regionally. USAID noted that Ecuador has
one of the fastest growing micro-finance systems in the region, with
interesting lessons to be shared. The GOE welcomed the invitation
to engage.
Facilitation of Trade and Investment
------------------------------------
¶6. (U) The Ecuadorians complained about Ecuador's growing non-oil
deficit, and noted that Ecuador's exports are far too concentrated
(the top ten exports account for 91.51% of total exports). They
stressed the need to diversify exports, and asked for USG assistance
to define a basket of products to diversify into, and USG
cooperation in facilitating U.S. market access through training,
research and development, marketing, and assistance in complying
with SPS rules. The U.S. side expanded on the Pathways to
Prosperity in the Americas initiative (ref B), a forum to help trade
benefits reach all levels of society, and noted the upcoming
Ministerial in Panama in December. Although Pathways initially
included only Latin American FTA partners with the U.S., it is being
expanded to include others in the region. The Ecuadorians expressed
interest in participating in the Ministerial as observers, and were
encouraged to reach out to Panama about the meeting.
¶7. (U) The Ecuadorians want greater participation of small and
medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in trade. USAID highlighted its
on-going program with private Ecuadorian banks that guarantee loans
to SMEs in Ecuador, and has already offered technical assistance so
that the GOE could replicate this guarantee fund in publicly
controlled banks. The GOE noted that a draft antimonopoly law was
completed and would soon be sent to Ecuador's interim legislative
body for approval. USAID applauded the effort for bringing
protection to consumers while allowing for competition, and offered
technical assistance on the law.
¶8. (SBU) On customs issues, the Ecuadorians pointed to preventing
drug smuggling and stronger port controls as key issues. They were
interested in technical assistance for incoming passenger controls
(such as identifying risk profiles), and for controlling land
frontiers. They also emphasized Ecuador's likely inability to
comply with 100% container scanning by 2012. The DHS Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official proposed working together
with Ecuador to identify equipment and provide training necessary
for Ecuador to meet the 100% scanning requirements. The USG side
also offered additional training and technical assistance in setting
up Ecuador's Trade Transparency Unit, which would allow Ecuador to
compare trade data and thus help identify corruption, tariff fraud,
and money laundering schemes. GOE officials noted President
Correa's plan to institute an electronic signature system to
facilitate trade and enhance transparency.
¶9. (SBU) A Ministry of Agriculture representative mentioned the GOE
desire to develop its livestock program further through Ecuador's
National Development Plan, stressing the need for training and
technology transfer to ensure benefits reach small producers. He
asked for USG assistance in developing eco-seals (certifications of
environmentally friendly processes) for products, while cautioning
that eco-seals would need to not increase transaction costs or
otherwise harm competitiveness, and would need to help small
producers. On the U.S. interest in market access for U.S. beef,
Ecuador's sanitary service, SESA, stated that the Andean Community
(CAN) was reviewing its rules on mad cow disease and that there
"could be commercial opportunities in this area soon." The
Ecuadorians noted that President Correa signed an "agro-quality"
law, creating an agency that will look at SPS and agricultural
issues simultaneously.
¶10. (SBU) The MFA detailed GOE efforts to promote its "10 star
sectors" identified for investment, noting a focus on non-oil and
non-traditional sectors. These included fruit and vegetable
processing, flowers, fish and aquaculture, forestry, biofuels,
tourism, and transport and logistics, among others. The Ecuadorians
asked for U.S. support to bolster the 10 sectors, particularly in
special promotional activities such as road shows and information
exchange (in a separate Heads of Delegation meeting, biofuels were
highlighted as an important area for cooperation). USAID praised
joint work in this endeavor. USAID funded the initial studies that
led to Correa adopting these "10 star sectors" as his national
economic growth strategy.
Investment Issues
-----------------
¶11. (SBU) USG officials stressed that investment disputes of U.S.
companies have contributed to a negative image of Ecuador's
investment climate in Washington. The U.S. side urged Ecuador to
look at foreign investment as an indispensable development tool, and
to treat foreign investors transparently and under stable rules.
The Ecuadorian side agreed that it wanted to improve its image and
emphasized that disputes would be resolved by law. GOE officials
noted that the government was designing a new investment law that
would provide a new legal framework for investment, based on
constitutional reforms covering investment ethics and investor
rights.
Cooperation and Technical Assistance
------------------------------------
¶12. (U) Risk management for natural disasters is an important area
of cooperation between the U.S. and Ecuador, and USAID is involved
in long standing programs with Ecuador. The Embassy's military
group has also provided strategic assistance in disaster response.
The Ecuadorians noted that they were working on building a new
national disaster relief system.
¶13. (SBU) Anti-narcotrafficking is another area where the GOE and
USG have extensive, successful cooperation. The Ecuadorians noted
the GOE was working on a draft drug control plan, which President
Correa was to sign at the end of December, and a draft law on the
management of seized assets. They asked for continued USG
assistance on antinarcotics initiatives, while calling for amounts
to be increased. In particular, they asked for assistance with
investigating the possibility of an asset seizure fund (to see if
they could share in the proceeds of the sale in the U.S. of seized
assets of Ecuadorian drug criminals). The U.S. side agreed to
investigate this further. The U.S. side also commented on the need
for an antiterrorism financing law so that Ecuador's Financial
Intelligence Unit would be eligible for international certification
and attendant access to information held by other certified units.
¶14. (SBU) The Ecuadorians noted the necessity of updating the
bilateral treaty on prisoner exchange and stressed the importance of
judicial assistance. The U.S. side noted that the USG has sought to
improve communication to facilitate the extradition process, such as
by holding digital video conferences, and agreed to investigate the
prisoner exchange issue.
Immigration Issues
------------------
¶15. (U) The Ecuadorians noted that, due to the importance of
migration issues in the current government, the Secretariat of
Migration would soon become a full Ministry, and explained their
program to assist Ecuadorian immigrants who return voluntarily.
They proposed a dialogue and information exchange focused on
assisting Ecuadorian immigrants in the U.S. (such as assistance with
language and job training).
¶16. (SBU) Officials from both the USG and GOE noted difficulties in
consular notification in both countries and the importance of
continued police training. DHS/ICE officers proposed establishing
an Electronic Travel Document System with the GOE that would allow
for a shorter detention period for Ecuadorian nationals detained by
U.S. authorities. DHS/ICE also expressed openness to sharing
information on detention and deportation processes.
¶17. (SBU) The GOE would like to promote the developmental impact of
remittances, noting the importance of remittances from the U.S. To
improve remittances services and lower transaction costs, the
Ecuadorians proposed an exchange of information on remittances, a
bilateral remittance document with qualitative and quantitative
information, and meetings with remittance agencies. USAID noted
that as a result of its programs, it had already connected 4,000
outlets in the U.S. with over 120 credit union offices in Ecuador.
USAID will work with Ecuadorian counterparts to further explore
areas of mutual interest on remittances.
¶18. (SBU) The MFA noted good cooperation with the U.S. and the
GOE's ongoing efforts against Trafficking in Persons (TIP), and that
Ecuador had moved from Tier 3 to Tier 2 in the State Department's
TIP report in 2005. DAS McMullen noted that the GOE's policy on
visa-free tourism had caused a sharp rise in Chinese migration,
abuses of migrants, and greater susceptibility to terrorist acts,
and offered technical assistance in migration controls. The
Ecuadorians responded that the GOE was implementing a travel
document requirement for Chinese effective December 1 (ref C).
McMullen cautioned about the need to check whether other countries
were taking advantage of the current policy.
Next Steps
----------
¶19. (U) The two sides agreed to hold the next meeting of the
Dialogue in Washington in 2009, most likely in May. Working groups
for each pillar will be formed to begin addressing pending issues,
and will report their results to the Dialogue plenary in 2009.
Comment
-------
¶20. (SBU) The Dialogue meeting created a formal opportunity to
engage the Correa government, show how U.S. policies support many
key GOE objectives, and establish a framework for future
cooperation. A joint USG-GOE press statement praised the Dialogue
for demonstrating the respect, friendship, and cooperation between
the two countries, and for working to jointly develop priority
areas. Media coverage of the talks was positive. GOE
representatives at the meeting appeared eager and enthusiastic about
potential collaboration in many areas.
¶21. (U) The U.S. delegation approved this cable.
CHRITTON