

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09STATE97946, DEPLOYMENTS OF U.S. SPECIAL FORCES IN PARAGUAY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09STATE97946.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09STATE97946 | 2009-09-21 20:08 | 2011-04-06 00:12 | SECRET//NOFORN | Secretary of State |
VZCZCXYZ0002
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHC #7946 2642111
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 212051Z SEP 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION PRIORITY 0000
INFO RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/JOINT STAFF WASHINTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/USSOCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
S E C R E T STATE 097946
NOFORN, SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/13/2029
TAGS: MASS PA PGOV PM PREL
SUBJECT: DEPLOYMENTS OF U.S. SPECIAL FORCES IN PARAGUAY
REFS: A) ASUNCION 426 B)ASUNCION 418
Classified By: Assistant Secretary, Thomas A. Shannon;
Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (U) This is an action message. See paragraph
eight.
¶2. (S/NF) SUMMARY: Since 2006, U.S. Special Forces
Operational Detachment Alpha (ODA) has been engaged in
equipping and training Paraguay's Joint Special Forces
Unit (BCFE) with the implicit support of the government
of Paraguay (including pursuant to Section 1208 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for FY05, as
amended). Although the Lugo administration in Paraguay
has expressed interest in strengthening our mil/mil
relationship in the long term, the GOP wants to put
further assistance from the Special Forces ODA on hold
at the conclusion of the training in September.
According to Special Operations Component, U.S. Southern
Command (SOCSOUTH), key mission objectives have been
accomplished to the extent possible, and USSOUTHCOM
plans to terminate this phase of the effort at the end
of the fiscal year. By mutual agreement between the USG
and the GOP, the members of the U.S. Special Forces ODA
unit engaged in training and equipping the BCFE will
depart Paraguay at the end of September, when the
training of the BCFE ends. Two Special Operations
Command, Forward (SOCFWD) personnel will remain in
Paraguay to monitor the transition of Section 1208-
funded equipment to the GOP. SOCSOUTH plans to deploy a
short-term TDY 12-person ODA team in the third quarter
of FY2010 to evaluate the consolidation of the BCFE and
reinforce its capabilities. The Department recognizes
the need to move forward to plan this deployment, but
requests post consult with the Department closer to the
actual deployment date before granting final country
clearance. DoD is aware of the Department's concerns
and will consult with us as we get closer to the event
regarding the feasibility of a deployment in the third
quarter of FY10. Upon receipt of additional, detailed
guidance, Post should be prepared to initiate
discussions with the GOP to obtain written legal
protection from the GOP for U.S. forces for any future
activity. End Summary.
---------------------------------
STATUS OF U.S. FORCES IN PARAGUAY
---------------------------------
¶3. (S/NF) Since 2006, the U.S. government has invested
significant resources to help establish, train, and
equip
Paraguay's new rapid reaction force (BCFE); has
supported the creation of a Paraguayan-flagged
peacekeeping unit under the Global Peace Operations
Initiative; and has implemented well-received
humanitarian assistance projects. We understand from
post that there are currently 21 long-term TDY DOD staff
positions in Paraguay that are not covered under
diplomatic or administrative and technical staff status,
including the six-member Special Forces ODA working with
the BCFE, a four-person MIST team, a six-person civil-
military support element (CMSE) for humanitarian
projects, and five Special Operations Command Forward
Headquarters (SOCFWD-HQ) staff. Six members of the ODA
team and three members of the SOCFWD-HQ are scheduled to
depart Paraguay by the end of September. SOCSOUTH plans
to deploy a 12-person ODA team in the third quarter of
FY2010 for a short-term TDY to provide follow-up
training and evaluation of the BCFE.
---------------------------------------
GOP POSITION ON US MILITARY COOPERATION
---------------------------------------
¶4. (S/NF) Ambassador Ayalde has repeatedly sought
clarification from the new GOP administration regarding
its position on U.S. military cooperation in Paraguay.
President Lugo has expressed support for
strengthening the relationship and values the
operational capacity of the newly trained BCFE.
Nonetheless, the GOP has been reluctant to provide a
written request for assistance or to provide in writing
status protections for U.S. military personnel not
accredited to the Embassy. In a June 30 meeting between
the Ambassador and Lugo, President Lugo noted that the
Minister of Defense had objections to U.S. military
cooperation. Lugo said he would meet with the MOD and
others and promised to provide greater clarity on the
GOP's intentions (REF B: ASUNCION 418).
¶5. (S/NF) On July 7, 2009, the Foreign Minister
requested a meeting with the Charge to inform him of the
GOP's decision to suspend any subsequent USG assistance
to the BCFE at the end of the current training in
September (REF A: ASUNCION 426). The Foreign Minister
said the GOP is interested in deepening our mil-mil
relationship, but that it needed a break ("un pequeno
descanso") to mark a shift from the past administration.
In the meeting, the Foreign Minister said the continued
presence of significant numbers of U.S. security forces
in Paraguay without the explicit and public agreement of
the GOP is a potential political liability for both the
United States and the GOP. Nevertheless, he stated that
other Special Operations units currently in Paraguay - a
civil-military support element, a MIST team, and the
SOCFWD-PY headquarters team working out of the Embassy -
are welcome to stay. By mutual agreement between the
USG and the GOP, the members of the U.S. Special Forces
ODA unit engaged in training and equipping the BCFE will
depart Paraguay in September at the conclusion of the
training. The Foreign Minister also said that President
Lugo intends to conclude a "security cooperation
agreement" with the USG before the end of the year.
Such an agreement, he said, would cover the entire range
of engagements and cooperation between the two
militaries. We note, however, this is not the first
such commitment the GOP has made, and the GOP, to date,
has not provided any details on what it proposes. Also,
there has been no authority granted pursuant to Circular
175 procedures to negotiate such an agreement on behalf
of the United States.
-----------------
POLITICAL CONTEXT
-----------------
¶6. (S/NF) One year into office, President Lugo is
confronted by the reality of governing with a fractured
ruling coalition, an antagonistic Congress, and
entrenched systemic corruption. Lugo has proven
resilient, and thus far has weathered deliberate
destabilization efforts that included a wave of small
explosive devices and bomb threats in Asuncion.
Nevertheless, rumors of coup-plotting persist along with
a continual erosion of Lugo's political capital. Given
the current environment and the absence of written
status protections for all DoD personnel in Paraguay,
their presence poses a potential political risk. At any
point, those who oppose Lugo or merely wish to weaken
his ties to the United States may publicly raise the
issue of U.S. forces in Paraguay and speculate about
their role in a way that undercuts U.S. interests. In
addition, there is a potential personal risk to U.S.
forces on training missions in Paraguay without the
benefit of status protections or equivalent.
-----------------
REGIONAL CONCERNS
-----------------
¶7. (S/NF) Recent reaction to the proposed U.S.
military presence in Colombia, as well as previous
concerns about the U.S. Fourth Fleet and false rumors
about U.S. military bases in Paraguay, underscore the
need to evaluate not only the bilateral implications of
our military relationship with Paraguay, but the
regional context as well. The SOCSOUTH engagement in
Paraguay over the past few years has successfully
increased the GOP capacity to respond to threats,
particularly those related to the Tri-Border area.
Although it is important to continue to work with
Paraguay and maintain the successful relationships that
have been built, regional political sensibilities must
be considered as we look to the future of our military
engagement with Paraguay. The long-term presence of
significant numbers of U.S. Special Forces in Paraguay
could engender negative regional reactions that would
undermine regional policy objectives. Continued
dialogue between the Department of State and Department
of Defense on how we engage the Lugo administration on
military cooperation is critical to striking the right
balance.
--------------
ACTION REQUEST
--------------
¶8. (S/NF) The Department of State understands the
remaining members of the SOCFWD-PY ODA training team
will depart post by September 30, 2009. In addition,
the Department of State is aware SOCSOUTH tentatively
plans to deploy a 12-person ODA team in the third
quarter of FY2010 for a short-term TDY to provide
follow-up training and evaluation of the BCFE. The
Department of State recognizes the need for SOCSOUTH to
plan for this deployment in advance.
¶9. (S/NF) There are clear advantages for moving
forward with the deployment if the risks are not too
great. But there is some risk that in the current
political environment in which the presence of U.S.
forces in Colombia is being publicly criticized by some
governments, disclosure by a third country government of
the presence of U.S. forces along with misinformation or
mischaracterization could damage our future ability to
engage in mil-mil cooperation with Paraguay or with
others in the region. Due to the aforementioned USG and
GOP concerns and the importance of evaluating the
regional political situation closer to the time of
actual deployment, the Department of State requests post
consult with the Department prior to granting country
clearance to this and future ODA deployments. Country
clearance should be considered as close to the actual
deployment date as possible, but no less than two months
prior to the deployment. The Department of State also
strongly encourages post to make the GOP aware of the
need for written status-of-forces protections for future
deployments of DoD personnel and to begin preparing the
GOP for eventual discussions regarding a status-of-
forces agreement, once the regional situation lends
itself to such an agreement, and once authority to
negotiate such an agreement on behalf of the United
States is granted pursuant to Circular 175 procedures.
Post should note that such status protection agreements
may involve several months of work both within the
interagency and with the host nation, and should begin
working with USSOUTHCOM approximately six months in
advance of the proposed deployment to ensure necessary
protections can be obtained.
CLINTON