

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 10STATE16421, MEETING OF THE FOOD AID COMMITTEE, FEBRUARY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10STATE16421.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
10STATE16421 | 2010-02-23 16:04 | 2011-05-02 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED | Secretary of State |
VZCZCXRO1125
PP RUEHIK
DE RUEHC #6421/01 0541650
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 231647Z FEB 10
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN PRIORITY 7493
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 6542
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 0207
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1508
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 2415
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 STATE 016421
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAID EC ETRD
SUBJECT: MEETING OF THE FOOD AID COMMITTEE, FEBRUARY
15-16, 2010
REF: STATE 130895
STATE 00016421 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (U) SUMMARY. The Food Aid Committee held an
"extraordinary meeting" in London February 15-16 to continue
discussions on the future of the 1999 Food Aid Convention.
Members discussed their vision of a convention as well as its
key objectives, the convention's place in the global food
security architecture, the role and nature of commitments
under a convention, and the role of the Food Aid Committee.
The committee agreed to establish a working group as a basis
for continuing dialogue in order to make the convention a
more effective instrument. (However, it remains unsettled
whether this would be accomplished through negotiation or
amending the current convention. No decision has been reach
to renegotiate the current convention.) The working group
will begin its work by March 15 and will finalize its written
report covering the major components of a convention by May
¶14. Members will again meet in London April 15-16 to
facilitate the process to improve the convention. The
working group will report back to the Food Aid Committee in
June. The European Commission continues to exert significant
pressure on the process arguing that the EC may vote against
extending the 1999 Convention at the June meetings unless
clear progress is being made, i.e., members can signal a
willingness to formally renegotiate the Convention. While
demonstrating a clear willingness to continue this
exploratory process, other members including the United
States continue to insist that they will not agree to
negotiations unless and until there is a shared vision for a
new and decidedly better convention. END SUMMARY.
¶2. (U) At an extraordinary meeting of the Food Aid Committee,
members discussed in detail their respective "vision
statements" for a food aid convention. They began by
discussing their vision of a convention as well as its key
objectives. Members broadly agreed that activities under a
convention should broadly contribute to the macro objectives
of reducing hunger, poverty and food insecurity. Moreover,
members agreed that the specific focus under the convention
should relate primarily to improving food access and food
consumption by vulnerable groups. In that regard, members
agreed that the focus on improving access to food would
complement other necessary efforts to improve overall food
availability in food insecure countries, especially those
based on the food security statement issued at the L'Aquila
Summit in July 2009. Members further agreed that the
Convention should help them ensure that appropriate,
effective, and nutritious food is available in response to
the food needs of vulnerable populations that arise in
natural disasters and in other food crisis situations.
Members also shared the view that FAC could play an important
role in helping members receive adequate credit for the
resources that they provide to meet food needs.
¶3. (U) Several members, led by the EC, argued in favor of
broadening the tool kit available under the convention from
food aid to food assistance (including not only food
commodities but also non-food mechanisms such as cash and
vouchers, and livelihood supports). However, Japan and
Switzerland argued in favor of a narrower focus on food aid.
In addition, Members agreed that all food aid/assistance
provided should be linked to needs and that the provision of
food aid/assistance under a convention should be informed by
a set of guiding principles such as "do no harm." Finally,
members agreed that there was a shared view that members
should engage more actively on coordination, cooperation and
information sharing in the future, especially when food
crises occur or are imminent. That said, no clear "shared
vision" of the rationale for a new convention emerged from
the lengthy discussions other than the need to ensure that
commitments reflect what members should do and are doing in
response to situations in which vulnerable groups require
food.
¶4. (U) In terms of where the convention (and its committee)
fits into the global food security architecture, members
value the committee as a donor's forum, independent of
implementing agencies such as the World Food Program, that
has important technical expertise. Members agreed that it
would be important to establish a link between the
discussions in the FAC and other food security and
humanitarian fora to avoid duplicating efforts. Rather, they
STATE 00016421 002.2 OF 003
would wish to exploit the potential expertise of the FAC
donor forum with a special focus on food access in
humanitarian, transitional and fragile contexts. The U.S.
reiterated that the Convention is the only legally binding
treaty governing the provision of food aid to the world's
needy and that it ensures a predictable minimum level of food
aid is available annually to help respond to natural and
man-made emergencies and other needs-based food requirements.
Members further agreed that other bodies are not
sufficiently aware of the work undertaken by the FAC and that
the FAC must do a better job integrating itself into the
global food security architecture while remaining
independent.
¶5. (U) Members struggled to find common ground with respect
to the role and the nature of commitments, a core component
of any convention, although there was agreement that resource
commitments should be linked to needs to the extent
practicable. The U.S. noted that commitments have
historically been a means of collective burden-sharing and
expressed an interest in discussing commitment approaches
that would be more relevant to situations in which the food
needs exceeded the ability of any individual member to
respond. (Note: the U.S. used the example of the looming food
needs of Niger and Chad to make this point.) However, the
focus of much of the discussion was more narrowly on
individual member commitments. Members mostly agreed on the
shortcomings of the current FAC structure, particularly its
narrow "tonnage of food" focus (although the U.S. has pointed
out that expressing commitments in tonnage rather than
monetary value provides some predictability by insulating
these commitments from price volatility). Members also
agreed on the problem that the current commitments structure
did not link commitments to need. However, no common view
emerged about the type of commitment that a new convention
might contain or the legal standing of that commitment
regime.
¶6. (U) COMMENT: Members clearly need to develop a shared
vision on FAC commitments concerning their type, content and
status (legally binding or political) if they are to move
ahead to negotiate a new convention. END COMMENT.
¶7. (U) Members expressed a willingness to explore the
possibility of a flexible commitment structure in which all
members would not have to make commitments in the same
fashion, but could allow them the option to commit in tonnage
terms, monetary terms, or in some other value. Members,
however, were unsure what such a hybrid approach would mean
in practice. Several donors, including the U.S. and Canada,
suggested that it would be useful to have independent
consultants consider the pros and cons of different types of
commitment regimes.
¶8. (U) Members all agreed that the Food Aid Committee is not
now living up to the pro-active role envisioned under the
current convention. However, they also agreed that the role
of the committee depends ultimately on the content and the
structure of a new Convention, making it difficult to discuss
this issue in detail at this point. Currently, members see
three main roles for the committee: exchange of best
practices/lessons learned-type information related to the
provision of food aid/food assistance; ongoing provision of
information through the FAC member website on situations
requiring (or likely to require) food aid/assistance and on
responses made in those situations; and possible
extraordinary meetings in response to particular on-going
emergencies to facilitate discussion and coordination between
donors and to highlight situations of developing crises.
¶9. (U) NEXT STEPS. The Food Aid Committee agreed to
establish a working group in order to continue work to make
the convention a more effective instrument. The working
group will begin its work by March 15 and will finalize its
written report on the major components of a convention by May
¶14. The EC has promised to circulate to members on March 15
a draft of elements of key articles (such as objectives and
commitments) of a new convention. Other members are expected
to respond to this draft with suggestions of their own. The
report will be put forward without any prejudice to a
position members may adopt in any formal negotiation of the
Convention. Members will meet again in London April 15-16 to
facilitate the process. The report of the working group will
be discussed at the informal meeting of members June 2 and 3
and then considered at the formal session of the Food Aid
Committee on June 4. On the basis of this report, the
Committee will decide how to proceed and, if necessary,
STATE 00016421 003.2 OF 003
revise the terms of reference of the working group.
¶10. (U) The European Commission continues to exert
significant pressure on the process. As in December, it
again made clear that it may vote against extending the 1999
Convention at the June meetings unless clear progress is
being made, i.e., members can signal a willingness to
renegotiate the Convention. (Unless members all agree to
extend it at the June 4 formal meeting of the Food Aid
Committee, the 1999 Convention is set to expire July 1.)
However, the EC signaled it is now willing to accept
something short of a specific start date for a formal
renegotiation. The Commission believes it can satisfy EU
member states with a clear indication from FAC members that
they are starting internal bureaucratic and/or legal
processes towards either reconfiguring or formally
renegotiating the FAC. While the U.S. demonstrated a clear
willingness to continue this exploratory process, like other
members it continues to insist that they will not agree to
negotiations unless and until there is a shared vision for a
new and decidedly better convention. Japan is particularly
reluctant to agree to negotiations at this time. The U.S.
delegation again made clear that it will seek guidance from
its senior leadership about whether to embark on negotiations
and the guiding principles for a new convention if the
leadership gives the green light only after a clear vision
for a new convention emerges.
CLINTON