

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06PARIS1720, FORMER DEFENSE MINISTER RICHARD: INSIGHTS ON EU
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06PARIS1720.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06PARIS1720 | 2006-03-17 15:03 | 2011-02-10 08:08 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Paris |
Appears in these articles: http://abonnes.lemonde.fr/documents-wikileaks/article/2011/02/09/wikileaks-les-visiteurs-de-l-ambassade_1477418_1446239.htm |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 PARIS 001720
SIPDIS
DEPT ALSO FOR EUR/WE, DRL/IL, INR/EUC, EUR/ERA, EUR/PPD,
AND EB
DEPT OF COMMERCE FOR ITA
DEPT OF LABOR FOR ILAB
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/07/2015
TAGS: PGOV ELAB EU FR PINR SOCI ECON MARR
SUBJECT: FORMER DEFENSE MINISTER RICHARD: INSIGHTS ON EU
AND NATO, AND ON DOMESTIC FRENCH POLITICS
Classified By: Ambassador Craig Stapleton for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (C) In a meeting March 9, Ambassador Stapleton and former
defense minister Alain Richard exchanged views on the roles
of NATO and the ESDP, on the steady continuity in France's
defense policies under Richard's successor (current Defense
Minister Michele Aliot-Marie), and on French domestic
politics. On NATO-ESDP, Richard rehearsed familiar arguments
that NATO should restrict itself to more high-end military
operations and leave civilian-military operations to the EU.
He deplored President Chirac's involvement in domestic
political issues in Cote d'Ivoire and UN reliance on France
(and the UK) in dealing with African crises. Acknowledging
his support for former economy minister Dominique
Strauss-Kahn in the 2007 presidential contest, Richard
criticized Segolene Royal for lack of substance and
discounted her support within the Socialist Party, and viewed
former PM Jospin as lacking the necessary fire in the belly.
By contrast, he predicted that Nicolas Sarkozy would obtain
the governing party's nomination but asserted that the
nervousness Sarkozy inspires in some voters could lead to the
victory of a more reassuring candidate of the left. Richard
criticized Chirac as anti-European in temperament. He
lamented President Chirac's and then-Foreign Minister de
Villepin's confrontational tactics towards the U.S. early
2003, while also underlining his fundamental agreement with
Chirac and Villepin's policy of keeping France on the
sidelines with regard to regime change and its aftermath in
Iraq. END SUMMARY.
NATO/ESDP
---------
¶2. (C) Opening with a review of differences between U.S.,
and French and European, views on the appropriate
intervention roles for NATO and the EU, Richard lamented that
NATO-EU cooperation often "seemed to resemble NATO-EU
rivalry." Consistent with the government's current policy,
Richard maintained that the real purpose of NATO should be
high-end military action, not "soft" peacekeeping and/or
humanitarian missions. He complained that the (U.S.-driven)
direction of capability development in NATO -- contingency
planning and force generation for "soft" missions -- was
gradually encroaching on EU turf, where France sees the
primary mission of the evolving European Security and Defense
Policy (ESDP). Richard worried that NATO was "expanding" in
such a way that it might eventually make ESDP superfluous.
¶3. (C) Richard argued that ESDP is unlikely to move from
debate to deployability unless EU member states step up to
making the investments required to create mission-ready
military capability. This would not happen, however, until
EU states were given more direct responsibility for dealing
with crises -- otherwise, they'll "just keep counting on the
U.S. to act and take them off the hook." Richard said that
certain changes in Europeans' operational practice could
facilitate greater assumption of responsibility by EU states,
for example the creation of multinational HQs to replace the
current national HQ setup for operations in which more than
one EU state participates, which would force EU member states
to "burdenshare responsibility for the outcomes."
CONTINUITY IN FRANCE'S DEFENSE POLICIES
---------------------------------------
¶4. (C) Richard noted that the overall direction of France's
defense and security policies had continued along the lines
set during his own tenure as defense minister (1997 - 2002).
Richard praised his successor, Michele Aliot-Marie for
"staying the course" with regard to professionalization and
ever greater readiness and deployability of France's armed
forces. He noted the bi-partisan consensus throughout
France's political establishment for these policies --
indeed, on foreign affairs and defense matters in general.
He praised Aliot-Marie for recognizing, as he had, the need
for senior officers to have international experience, and the
need to keep French troops prepared to work well in
multi-national or coalition operations.
GREATER EU CAPABILITY DOES NOT UNDERMINE NATO
--------------------------------------------
¶5. (C) Richard said that France is encouraging other EU
member states to engage in similar, qualitative and
quantitative, improvement of military capability. Richard
believes that, though there has been considerable
improvement, in France and in other EU states, in overall
military capabilities (he cited Germany in particular), much
progress could still be made. Richard underlined that such
progress in EU states' capability would never outstrip the
capabilities institutionalized in NATO, nor would such
improvements "compete with NATO" in any way. In Richard's
view -- as in the view of many French security and defense
analysts -- the range of failed state and humanitarian crises
likely to require responses that have a military dimension
will in all likelihood increase in coming years, which calls
for building as much capability as possible, whether under
the auspices of NATO or the EU or European states
individually. Note: Embassy DATT pointed out to Richard that
German military capability has in fact been cut during
recent years, and that increasing instances of operational
deployment of German contingents gives the, erroneous,
impression of increased capability. End Note.
CHIRAC'S MISTAKES IN IVORY COAST
--------------------------------
¶6. (C) Richard criticized President Chirac for breaking what
Richard opined should be a cardinal rule for guiding
decisions about French involvement in sub-Saharan Africa:
never get involved in African domestic problems; intervene
only when French strategic interests are at stake. Richard
went on to criticize the way the international community and
the UN (and specifically Kofi Annan) "depended on France"
(and to a lesser degree, the UK) to take care of problems in
Africa. Richard added that political problems in Africa "can
almost never be solved" since agreements reached to solve
them are, according to Richard, all to often immediately
ignored by the parties to them. Richard welcomed increasing
U.S. military cooperation in the region, agreeing that the
increased numbers of U.S. military attaches and other
programs (many emanating from EUCOM) would be good for the
region.
INTERNAL FRENCH POLITICS -- CENTER-LEFT PS
------------------------------------------
¶7. (C) Richard is a member of the French Socialist Party's
(PS) 306-member National Council which elects the members of
the party's National Bureau and its National Secretariat
(executive committee). A member of the party's most moderate
faction, Richard is close both to former prime minister
Lionel Jospin and former economy minister Dominique
Strauss-Kahn. Richard said that the party -- at the
instigation of party National Secretary Francois Hollande --
had erred in putting off selection of its 2007 presidential
nominee until November 2006. In Richard's view, the other
principal parties' candidates will, well before next
November, have established themselves and their messages in
the public eye. Richard said he suspected that Hollande put
off the date of the PS's nomination decision for as long as
possible in order to preserve his own chances for nomination,
based on the calculation that other would-be nominees might
well fall out of the race or that internecine struggles would
allow him to emerge as a compromise.
¶8. (C) Richard discounted, but did not dismiss, the chances
of Poitou-Charentes Region President Segolene Royal of
mounting a winning bid for the PS nomination and the
presidency thereafter. "Because you have to wonder what is
the substance -- the solidity -- of her popularity." Richard
said that he doubted that Royal's current high-standing in
opinion polls would hold, particularly through the upcoming
season of hardball campaigning. Nonetheless Richard
described Royal as both determined and skillfully aiming to
use her popularity to "impose herself on the party members"
(who will be voting for the party's nominee in November).
¶9. (C) Skewering former prime minister Laurent Fabius as
"suffering from a deficit of sincerity," Richard acknowledged
his support for Strauss-Kahn. Richard observed that the
upcoming party primary, among the PS's roughly 125,000
"aging" members (nearly half of whom are also elected
officials of one sort or another), remained a wide-open
contest. In Richard's analysis, Royal can now count on about
"10 to 15 percent of the votes," and "Fabius has between 20
and 25 percent," which "leaves the 70 percent remaining" to
be won or lost in the primary campaign, most of whom he
claimed opposed Royal. Richard said that the campaigning
among the party members would be long and tough, and that
Strauss-Kahn had been, and planned to remain -- particularly
assiduous in his courting of party members between now and
November of this year.
¶10. (C) Citing what he called "the guts factor," Richard
wondered aloud if Jospin, as much as he might want to be
drafted as the party nominee, really had the stomach for a
political fight to the finish against -- in the scenario
Richard assumed most likely -- Interior Minister Nicolas
Sarkozy. Citing Jospin's lackluster performance as a
candidate in 2002, and his sudden retirement in a pique
following his unexpected defeat in the first round of the
2002 election, Richard said he had to have doubts about
Jospin's electability. However, Richard also added that in a
face-off against Sarkozy, Jospin might well prove the more
reassuring, indeed, presidential, figure, able to capitalize
on the French electorate's fear of change, particularly
brusque change. As Richard put it, "Sarkozy has enormous
qualities -- but not the one of being reassuring to anybody."
The one thing that Richard said he was sure of is that the
PS would, in the end, unite behind the candidate who emerges
victorious, if scarred, from the party's nomination
competition.
INTERNAL FRENCH POLITICS -- CENTER-RIGHT UMP
--------------------------------------------
¶11. (C) Richard, tracking with the views of nearly every
professional politician who has commented to us on the
subject, stated bluntly that Villepin would not be able to
displace Sarkozy as the nominee of the ruling, center-right
Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) party. In addition,
Richard suggested that the "Matignon syndrome" -- the way the
prime ministership in France chews up its incumbents and
their popularity -- would sink any chances Villepin might
hope he may have to run for the presidency.
THE CENTER-LEFT CAN WIN
-----------------------
¶12. (C) Overall -- while being careful to concede this could
be wishful thinking on his part -- Richard said that voters'
tendency to "throw the bums out," along with their misgivings
about Sarkozy, gave the center-left a good chance of winning
in 2007. Richard added that "it was no longer possible to
say one thing during the campaign and do another once
elected" and that far-reaching change for France was
inevitable. Richard admitted that he was at a loss as to how
the PS could project itself and its candidate as standing for
"safe change" if running as the party of the status quo
against the risk of "real change" as promised and intended by
Sarkozy.
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
------------------
¶13. (C) Richard said that the French system of government
was evolving quickly, largely due to the unintended
consequences of shortening the presidential term to five
years. According to Richard (and quite few other observers)
the Fifth Republic is moving towards a garden-variety
"presidential system." The new five-year presidential term,
with legislative elections following immediately after the
presidential elections, increases the likelihood of one party
holding both the presidency and the parliamentary majority.
Both president and parliamentary majority are likely to be
elected on the basis of a common program, with the result
that the president will become responsible for managing the
government's execution of that program.
FUTURE OF EUROPE
----------------
¶14. (C) Richard lamented the French public's rejection of
the proposed EU Constitutional treaty last May 29. He placed
part of the blame on Chirac's lukewarm commitment to Europe.
He described Villepin and Chirac as more nationalist than
European, and went on to criticize Chirac as overly
opportunistic, and lacking the consistency necessary for
forging productive, long-term relationships with France's
European partners. Richard added that Chirac had severely
damaged his credibility with the EU's new member states when
he rudely admonished them to "shut up," with regard to
France's opposition to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Richard acknowledged that such French attitudes have served
to increase nationalism in the new member states, and added
that this nationalism, and the suspicion of Europe that goes
with it, "particularly in conservative Poland", promise
difficult times ahead for comity among the member states of
the EU.
U.S.-FRANCE RELATIONS
---------------------
¶15. (C) Richard said that even though the French political
establishment is prone to opposing the U.S., the French
public remains attracted to the U.S. Like nearly all French
political figures -- speaking to us in private on the subject
-- Richard decried "the folly" of Chirac and then Foreign
Minister de Villepin's grandstanding opposition to the U.S.
and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Richard said Chirac and
Villepin's actions may have offered a "couple of weeks of
psychic satisfaction" to the French, but at the price of
undermining France's influence and standing on the world
stage. Again, like so many French political figures who
lament the antics of Chirac and Villepin in early 2003,
Richard also insisted that he believed the U.S. made a
grievous strategic mistake in going into Iraq. Richard
underscored his respect, indeed, love, for American ideals,
and described at length his -- and his compatriots' --
admiration for the dynamism of America. He also complimented
American expertise, saying that, "on any subject, you have
the best experts -- including on Iraq." But he wondered aloud
why the U.S. had "ignored its experts and made such a big
mistake." The meeting ended with a discussion of the changes
wrought by the attacks of September 11, 2002 on American
perception of threats to U.S. security.
COMMENT
-------
¶16. (C) Fluent in English, lucid and brimming with dry wit
and good humor, Richard exuded self-confidence and
competence. His genuine attachment to the U.S. was evident,
as was his concerned perplexity with regard to why -- in
Richard's view -- the U.S. was not better prepared for Iraq.
Although Richard's comment about Sarkozy's inability to
reassure voters was on the mark, it is also true that the
Jospins and Strauss-Kahns he finds more reassuring also
belong to his own political generation. END COMMENT.
Please visit Paris' Classified Website at:
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/paris/index.c fm
Stapleton