

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 10BELGRADE19, Serbia: Ambassador's First Meeting with President Tadic
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10BELGRADE19.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
10BELGRADE19 | 2010-01-29 17:05 | 2010-12-09 21:09 | SECRET | Embassy Belgrade |
VZCZCXRO1757
RR RUEHAG RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSL
DE RUEHBW #0019/01 0291750
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
R 291750Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY BELGRADE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0678
INFO EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUZEJAA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 05 BELGRADE 000019
SIPDIS
AMEMBASSY ANKARA PASS TO AMCONSUL ADANA
AMEMBASSY ASTANA PASS TO AMCONSUL ALMATY
AMEMBASSY BERLIN PASS TO AMCONSUL DUSSELDORF
AMEMBASSY BERLIN PASS TO AMCONSUL LEIPZIG
AMEMBASSY BELGRADE PASS TO AMEMBASSY PODGORICA
AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PASS TO AMCONSUL ST PETERSBURG
AMEMBASSY ATHENS PASS TO AMCONSUL THESSALONIKI
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL VLADIVOSTOK
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL YEKATERINBURG
E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/01/29
TAGS: PREL PGOV SR KV
SUBJECT: Serbia: Ambassador's First Meeting with President Tadic
CLASSIFIED BY: Mary Warlick, Ambassador, State, EXEC; REASON: 1.4(B),
(D)
Summary
-------
¶1. (C) In a January 28 meeting with Serbian President Tadic, the
Ambassador emphasized her desire to expand bilateral cooperation on
defense and economic issues, as well as to increase high-level
contacts between our governments. Tadic welcomed the intent but
expressed frustration that he had not been able to visit Washington
for over four years. Echoing comments made in his public remarks
during the Ambassador's credentialing ceremony (para. 12), Tadic
warned that U.S. policy toward Kosovo threatened democracy in
Serbia by strengthening the nationalist opposition. The Ambassador
reiterated U.S. support for Serbia's EU aspirations and urged
continued strong cooperation with the ICTY. Tadic expressed
appreciation for U.S. support on EU integration and explained that
Serbia was pursuing the remaining ICTY indictees because it was in
its own interest to do so. Similarly, as a Dayton guarantor Serbia
would continue to support the territorial integrity of
Bosnia-Herzegovina, Tadic said. He told the Ambassador that he
would work with Croatian President-elect Josipovic, an old
acquaintance, to address the many difficult issues dividing Serbia
and Croatia. On Kosovo, Tadic emphatically stated that Serbia
would not change its position on its own territorial integrity. He
expressed the desire to pursue a dialogue after the International
Court of Justice renders its advisory opinion, as the current
situation was untenable. The Ambassador responded that the
dialogue should begin now in order to find the best way to manage
reaction to the ICJ's opinion and move forward on the many pressing
issues related to Kosovo. End Summary.
¶2. (SBU) After presenting her credentials on January 28, the
Ambassador had a 45 minute working meeting with President Boris
Tadic. Tadic was accompanied by his foreign policy advisor Jovan
Ratkovic and MFA State Secretary Mirko Stefanovic.
Bilateral
---------
¶3. (C) The Ambassador told Tadic that she was eager to work with
him to build on the strong foundation created by her predecessors,
noting that Vice President Biden's May 2009 visit to Belgrade had
opened a new chapter in our bilateral relations. She said that the
military-to-military relationship was strong, but it was time to
take it to the next level through increased joint training and
exchanges, Serbian contributions to peacekeeping missions, and
participation in NATO Partnership for Peace (PfP) activities. The
Ambassador also told Tadic that she would focus on expanding
economic and business ties, including new investments, and
supporting the completion of Serbia's WTO accession. She also
emphasized her commitment to seek opportunities for additional
high-level contacts between our governments. She noted President
Tadic's visit to UNGA last fall, the recent visits of Defense
Minister Sutanovac and Foreign Minister Jeremic to Washington, and
Interior Minister Dacic's meetings this week. The Ambassador
pointed to two upcoming congressional delegations to Serbia and the
February 10 groundbreaking for the New Embassy Compound (NEC) in
Belgrade as early opportunities to continue our engagement and
further highlight the relationship publicly.
¶4. (C) Tadic said he was pleasantly surprised to hear about the
scheduled groundbreaking event, as he had worked with four
different U.S. ambassadors going back to his tenure as Minister of
Defense to identify a suitable location for the new U.S. Embassy
BELGRADE 00000019 002 OF 005
and facilitate the sale. He commented that he was encouraged to
see countries such as the U.S. and China investing in modern
diplomatic facilities in Belgrade. He also stated that it was time
for the Serbian government to reconstruct its own buildings damaged
during the 1999 NATO intervention.
¶5. (C) Shifting topics abruptly, Tadic voiced a complaint that
despite all the talk of expanding the bilateral relations and the
strong ties between Serbia and the U.S., he himself had not visited
Washington in over four years. (Note: To our knowledge this is
the first time that Tadic has expressed an interest in doing so in
several years.) He commented that concrete results of high-level
engagement were lacking, and cautioned that U.S. policy toward the
Balkans, in particular on Kosovo, had implications for democracy in
Serbia. Recalling his own early involvement in the democracy
movement and the month he had spent in jail for his activism, Tadic
said that his government was committed to continued democratic
reform; it had to contend with a significant nationalist
opposition, however. The Ambassador reiterated the USG's
commitment, following on the Vice President's May 2009 visit, to
sustained bilateral engagement with Serbia on all issues, including
those areas where we do not agree. She offered to continue to
explore possibilities for high-level visits on both sides to keep
our bilateral channels open.
European Integration and ICTY Cooperation
-----------------------------------------
¶6. (C) The Ambassador recalled Vice President Biden's expression
of support for Serbia's European aspirations and congratulated
Tadic on his government's recent achievements with the EU,
including visa liberalization, implementation of the Interim Trade
Agreement, and submission of its membership application. The U.S.
saw the integration of the Western Balkans into the European Union
as a key priority and remained prepared, working with the EU, to
support this process. She underscored the importance of continued
engagement with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former
Yugoslavia (ICTY) and U.S. readiness to support the hunt for Ratko
Mladic and Goran Hadzic.
¶7. (S) Tadic expressed appreciation for U.S. help with the EU
accession process. On ICTY cooperation, he explained that Serbia
was working intensively to capture Ratko Mladic "for our own
reasons," not due to pressure from the international community or
the ICTY, but to demonstrate its own resolve to capture war
criminals. He emphasized Serbia's commitment to reconciliation in
the region, pointing to its responsibilities as a guarantor of
Dayton. He also underscored Serbia's commitment to cooperation
with the U.S. on a range of threats, including organized crime,
corruption, terrorism, and narcotics, pointing to the success of
several recent joint counternarcotics operations. Tadic stated
that undertaking such sensitive operations was politically risky
and Serbia would continue to do the right thing; in return,
however, Serbia hoped for similarly strong bilateral engagement in
other areas and expected support from the U.S. on these efforts
with other countries in the region. The Ambassador expressed U.S.
appreciation for Serbia's strong cooperation in these important
areas and said she would be glad to discuss any areas of specific
concern.
Regional Cooperation
--------------------
BELGRADE 00000019 003 OF 005
¶8. (C) The Ambassador noted the important role that Serbia can and
needs to play on regional relations and stability, particularly
with regard to Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia. She conveyed
appreciation for the Serbian government's constructive support of
the Butmir process and urged Tadic to remain engaged with the
parties, including RS leader Milorad Dodik, in particular. She
expressed USG concern about the prospect of any referendum moving
forward in the Republika Srpska. Tadic said that Serbia believed
the preservation of BiH's territorial integrity was paramount; as a
guarantor of the Dayton Accords, Serbia sought a peaceful solution
on constitutional reform that would be consistent with Dayton
principles and preserve the model of two entities, three
constituent peoples. Tadic noted that he was seeking a
parliamentary resolution on Srebrenica to recognize the gravity of
the crimes committed there.
¶9. (C) With regard to Croatia, Tadic said that he had known
President-elect Ivo Josipovic for a long time and wanted to work
with him to address the many different open issues such as the
"huge problem" of refugees and property rights. He said he
expected the U.S. to support Serbian efforts to improve that
relationship and address the outstanding issues. Tadic told the
Ambassador that he would soon visit Albania and commented on the
enormous organized crime problem facing Montenegro, where he also
requested U.S. support. He emphasized that Serbia supported the
independence and territorial integrity of its neighbors in the
region, but many issues needed to be addressed.
¶10. (C) Turning to Kosovo, Tadic told the Ambassador "I must be as
clear as possible with you - Serbia will not change its views on
its territorial integrity. I want to be direct with you, as I have
with your other colleagues. After the International Court of
Justice (ICJ) issues its advisory opinion, we want to pursue
dialogue and find a way to address the issues related to Kosovo, as
the current situation is untenable." The Ambassador responded that
despite our clear differences, the U.S. and Serbia needed to keep
the channels of communication on Kosovo open. While the Vice
President had conveyed our agreement to disagree on Kosovo, it was
important for Serbia to focus on practical ways to improve the
lives of Serbs in Kosovo and on resolving outstanding issues. She
emphasized the need for Serbia to take a responsible and forward
looking approach after the ICJ opinion, consistent with President
Tadic's own forward looking approach toward European integration,
that would not do harm to stability in the region nor to the other
important work on our bilateral agenda. She recommended both sides
begin a dialogue now about how to manage the way forward and said
she hoped to continue discussions with Tadic's foreign policy
advisor, Jovan Ratkovic, on this subject as early as next week.
Comment
-------
¶11. (S) Comment: President Tadic made clear during the meeting
and in his public statement that he does not intend to back down on
Kosovo. At the same time, he demonstrated that he is open to
dialogue and told us what he wants: a warm reception in Washington
and continued high level engagement across the U.S. interagency,
cooperation on sensitive security issues, public support for
Serbia's efforts to improve regional relations, and sensitivity to
the domestic political constraints he faces on Kosovo policy. Now
is the opportune moment to lay out for Tadic and his key foreign
policy advisors what we expect of him, namely a constructive and
coordinated response to the ICJ's upcoming advisory opinion
accompanied by increased pragmatism in establishing a modus vivendi
BELGRADE 00000019 004 OF 005
with Kosovo, and continued forceful engagement with Milorad Dodik
to preserve stability in BiH. In the coming months, high-level
Washington engagement with Tadic will be essential to drive these
messages home. The other sine qua non is a strong, consistent
message from the European Union that continued antagonism and
inflexibility on Kosovo after the ICJ opinion will hamper Serbia's
progress toward membership. End Comment.
¶12. (U) Text of President Tadic's remarks (translation provided by
the Presidency):
ADDRESS BY
HIS EXCELLENCY MR. BORIS TADIC, PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF
SERBIA, ON THE
OCCASSION OF THE PRESENT A TION OF THE LETTERS OF CREDENCE BY HER
EXCELLENCY MRS. MARY WARLICK, AMBASSADOR EXTRAORDINARY AND
PLENIPOTENTIARY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO
THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Belgrade, 28 January 2010
Excellency,
It is my great pleasure to receive the Letters by which the
Honorable Barack Obama, President of the United States of America
is accrediting you as Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary
to the Republic of Serbia.
May I ask you, Excellency, to convey to President Obama my cordial
greetings and the assurances of my highest consideration.
The relationship with the United States of America is one of the
pillars of the foreign policy of the Republic of Serbia. Ever since
the times when the interests of our country in the United States of
America were represented by the diplomat and the well-known
scientist of Serbian origin Mihailo Pupin, the bilateral relations
between our two countries have been characterized by friendship and
alliance at all turning points in the world's history of the
twentieth century. Such relations and all-round cooperation were
damaged at the time of the regime of Slobodan Milosevic. Following
the democratic changed in Serbia, we have restored our close
cooperation which entered a new quality phase after the visit of
Vice-President Biden.
Today, Serbia is a truly democratic country. In the past ten years
of the democratic transition we have successfully implemented many
reforms guaranteeing the respect of human rights, minority rights,
media freedoms and free elections. We are very grateful for the
assistance by the United States of America in this democratization
process in Serbia.
We are particularly satisfied with the successful cooperation that
we established with the United States of America in combating
international terrorism and organized crime.
BELGRADE 00000019 005 OF 005
Excellency,
Large Serbian community in America has for centuries provided a
link between our two countries and contributed to the creation of
American society. Serbia is a sister state with the State of
Illinois and the main partner of the Army of Serbia is the National
Guard of Ohio.
We are particularly pleased with the fact that American companies
are among the biggest foreign investors in Serbia.
Madam Ambassador,
Becoming a full member of the European Union is the strategic goal
of the Republic of Serbia. We are convinced that the European Union
will not be complete until Serbia and other Western Balkan
countries are integrated into it. The support of the United States
of America in that regard is of exceptional importance.
Madam Ambassador,
Serbia will continue to defend its sovereignty and territorial
integrity in Kosovo by political and diplomatic means. We would
like 2010 to be the year of peaceful, compromise and realistic
solution of this issue, after the International Court of Justice
renders its advisory opinion. Despite different positions that we
have regarding the status of Kosovo, we hope that American policy
will respect legitimate Serbian interests and that it will not
jeopardize democracy in Serbia.
At the same time, Serbia is very much concerned about the plans of
Pristina to forcefully establish its rule over the majority-Serb
northern Kosovo. If this strategy were to be implemented it would
have unforeseen consequences for the stability of the region.
Excellency,
Serbia is strongly committed to strengthening the regional
cooperation and good-neighbourly relations. Without a stable,
democratic Serbia it is not possible to imagine the stable and
prosperous Western Balkans. Serbia respects the sovereignty and
territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina, its internal
arrangements defined by the Dayton Accords as well as the European
and Euro-Atlantic integration of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Excellency,
You begin your mission at the very important time for the Republic
of Serbia but also for the further development of the relations
between our two countries. I wish you every success in the
discharge of your responsible duties. l am convinced that with your
knowledge and experience you will make an important contribution to
the development of the overall cooperation between our two
countries.
WARLICK