

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE168, COSTA RICA: STRATEGY FOR ADVANCING IPR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE168.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE168 | 2009-03-12 18:06 | 2011-03-21 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0168/01 0711858
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 121858Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0578
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 5054
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000168
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
EEB/TPP/IPE FOR JURBAN AND SKEAT
PLEASE PASS TO DOJ FOR BLIPMAN
PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR DOLIVER, AMALITO AND GVETERE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON KIPR PGOV PREL CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA: STRATEGY FOR ADVANCING IPR
REF: A) 07 SAN JOSE 0335
B) 08 SAN JOSE 0155
C) 09 SAN JOSE 0138
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Post leveraged the February 10-14 visit by
Department of Justice OPDAT Program Director Robert Lipman and U.S.
Judge Virginia Hernandez Covington to advance our three-point
strategy on intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement. Our
strategy seeks to (1) facilitate USPTO, DOJ, and other sources of
training for the Costa Rican judiciary, (2) encourage greater IPR
cooperation between other Latin American countries and Costa Rica,
and (3) collaborate on private sector IPR lobbying/pursuit of IPR
case resolution. Our aim is to slowly move the cause of IPR ahead
in Costa Rica, despite the minimal engagement of the Attorney
General (AG) on these issues. Lipman and Covington met with a broad
sampling of stakeholders (including the AG, and Mexican prosecutors,
via a DVC) in order to present a thorough overview of IPR issues.
Specific next steps include: pursuing DOJ-offered training for
judges at Costa Rica's Judicial School, supporting a private sector
alliance for prosecuting IPR crimes, engaging the AG's office on
training opportunities for prosecutors, and encouraging further
collaboration with the GOM and other regional countries on IPR
training and DVC exchanges. END SUMMARY.
------------------------------
SESSIONS WITH THE STAKEHOLDERS
------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) The Lipman/ Covington February 10-14 visit provided us the
opportunity to engage with a variety of stakeholders on IPR issues.
We arranged for meetings with the following institutions/ groups:
-- Judicial Investigative Agency (OIJ, FBI-equivalent);
-- University of Costa Rica;
-- National Registry (similar to USPTO in function);
-- Ministry of Public Security;
-- Judicial School;
-- Judicial branch IP attorneys;
-- Costa Rican Attorney General;
-- a forum of private sector executives;
-- a forum of judicial and legal officials; and
-- a DVC collaboration with Mexican IPR prosecutors (courtesy of
Embassy Mexico City).
¶3. (SBU) Typically, DOJ conducts a training module when it arrives
in country. However, due to the unique IPR circumstances in Costa
Rica -- recently passed legislation as part of CAFTA-DR entry into
force (EIF), an AG independent of the executive branch, and a lax
legal environment (Refs A, B, and C) -- Post and DOJ decided a
series of meetings with stakeholders would generate the best
information and guide overall engagement on IPR and tactics for IPR
training in Costa Rica.
-----------------------
PROFILE OF AN OBSTACLE
----------------------
¶4. (U) As reported in previous Special 301 Reports (Refs A, B, and
C), the office of the Costa Rican AG sits in the judicial branch,
(fiercely) independent of the executive branch. Within the judicial
branch, the President of the Judiciary (the President of the Supreme
Court) has only nominal authority over the office of Attorney
General. Thus, the AG office holder, in this case, Francisco
Dall'Anese, exercises broad powers and exerts independence from the
other branches of government including the judiciary.
¶5. (SBU) Currently, our relations with the AG are cordial and
formal. The formal aspect results from the AG's requirement that
all contact with the office of the AG on any issue, consular,
judicial, anti-drugs, trafficking in persons, IPR, etc., be
channeled through the Director, Office of Technical Assistance and
International Relations, Andrea Murillo. This "gatekeeper" approach
tends to constrain the pace and efficiency of communication.
Dall'Anese was re-elected to a second four-year term in late 2007,
but our contacts speculate that he is unlikely to run for a third
term in 2011.
¶6. (U) Regarding IPR, the AG repeatedly states two issues:
-- the AG's office does not have the resources to pursue IPR crimes
given other priorities, i.e. prosecuting two former Presidents and
organized crime; and
-- the private sector has the resources so it should prosecute IPR
crimes through civil and/or criminal action.
This publicly stated position posed a difficult issue for the GOCR
during CAFTA-DR implementation. The Ministry of Foreign Trade
(COMEX) agreed to USTR's request to establish a special IPR
prosecutor's office, which required then Vice President Laura
Chinchilla (now a presidential candidate) to request the AG to
establish the office. The AG committed to assigning responsibility
for IPR issues to an individual within the Miscellaneous Crimes
unit, but not to setting up a dedicated unit/office per se. Thanks
to USPTO and DOJ training opportunities in late 2008, we were able
to establish relations with the Miscellaneous Crimes issues (through
Director Murillo).
------------------------------------
ALTERNATIVE PATHS AROUND AN OBSTACLE
------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Considering the AG's IPR views and tactics, we designed a
three-point strategy for achieving IPR progress in the short and
long run, which, we hope, will chip away at resistance in the
judiciary.
-- First, invite all relevant components of the judiciary to as many
IPR-related training sessions (USPTO, DOJ, etc.) as possible. In a
conversation with the Ambassador in August 2008, Supreme Court
President Luis Paulino Mora indicated his interest in DOJ training
while affirming that there is a "cultural or reluctance" in Latin
America against IPR prosecution. We will use his interest to help
support our efforts (even if the AG's office is less cooperative at
times);
-- Second, in the interest of broadening the horizons of Costa Rican
prosecutors and attorneys, we contacted other U.S. Embassies in the
region to identify IPR prosecutors/ supporters working on the
frontline of enforcement. During the Lipman/ Covington visit, a DVC
linked Mexican IPR prosecutors (broadcasting from Embassy Mexico)
with Costa Rican prosecutors (broadcasting from Costa Rican
prosecutor's office). The exchange produced an informative
dialogue. In terms of pursuing cases and the formal organization of
IPR within the respective judiciaries, Mexico is certainly ahead of
Costa Rica. As a result of the DVC, Mexico offered to help Costa
Rica with IPR training. (COMMENT: Embassy San Jose thanks Econoff
Joseph Salazar of Embassy Mexico for making the arrangements with
Mexican IPR prosecutors and facilitating the DVC in Embassy Mexico
City. END COMMENT); and
-- Third, the Costa Rican private sector maintains a very different
view of IPR than the AG and believes that innovation must be
protected. During the Lipman/ Covington visit, key officials from
AmCham, the chamber of exporters, the chamber of information and
communications technology, and private law practices met with
Lipman, Covington and Emboffs to advance the idea of the private
sector aggressively pursuing IPR cases through a cooperative
alliance. Cases could be civil or criminal, since Costa Rican law
allows for private parties to pursue criminal cases in loose
cooperation with the AG's office. Such legal actions would
(hopefully) force the judiciary to recognize the importance of IPR
protection to Costa Rican commerce and highlight the issue in the
local media.
¶8. (U) Separate but related to our efforts, COMEX is strongly
supporting the IPR Council, a multi-agency body that meets weekly to
discuss IPR issues. Headed by the Ministry of Justice, the
Council's members include representatives from the Ministries of
Public Security, Science and Technology, and Trade (COMEX); Customs;
the National Registry; the Judicial School; the Judicial
Investigative Agency; and the Fiscal General. Adriana Chaves, a
prosecutor and a recipient of DOJ IPR training in late 2008,
represented the Fiscal General at the most recent meeting.
----------------------------------
GOALS FOR THE SHORT- AND LONG-TERM
----------------------------------
¶9. (SBU) The goals of our three-point IPR strategy (training,
international collaboration, and private sector support) are A) to
better collaborate with the Costa Rican judiciary in a variety of
ways and B) to produce cases for prosecution by way of private
sector pressure and involvement. Since Supreme Court President Mora
in essence requested training assistance, we will provide it, using
USPTO, DOJ, and even other countries in order to keep IPR issues on
the judiciary's radar screen. Meanwhile, the private sector will
mount a "flanking attack" by introducing cases into the court system
which will be heard by some judges with USPTO and/or DOJ training.
In the long run, i.e. post-2011, when Dall'Anese will likely have
left office, we hope that the USG-provided training and the cases
pushed by the private sector will have changed the "culture of
reluctance" sufficiently so that prosecutors and judges will
understand the importance of IPR enforcement and be more willing to
prosecute cases.
---------------
ONE OTHER LEVER
---------------
¶10. (SBU) The USG retains one other lever, of course, in the form
of the Special 301 Report. With the necessary legislation in place,
2009 will be an interesting trial for Costa Rica's IPR resolve. We
hope that the GOCR will make good use of training and collaboration
opportunities this year.
---------
NOW WHAT?
---------
¶11. (U) In the wake of the Lipman/ Covington visit and the Mexican
DVC, Post has several immediate initiatives to pursue:
-- a DOJ training session for judges at the Judicial School (in
June);
-- a meeting of the private sector alliance to outline a plan for
lobbying and for prosecuting IPR crimes. The lobbying campaign
would press the judiciary to prosecute IPR crimes, and the
legislature to approve the yet-to-be passed, IPR-related 14th
CAFTA-DR bill);
-- continued dialogue with the AG's office to determine what type of
training is appropriate for IPR staff prosecutors;
-- provision of DOJ software -- the Real-Time Analytic Intelligence
Database (RAID) application in Spanish -- to the Judicial
Investigative Agency (OIJ) at no cost (COMMENT: Investigative
analysts and document examiners in law enforcement use RAID to
provide document and evidence intelligence in a distributive
computer network environment. END COMMENT); and
-- Mexican training of IPR staff in the office of the AG.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶12. (SBU) Ultimately, we cannot predict how successful our
three-point strategy may be, but it underscores our commitment to
focus Costa Rican attention on the IPR issue. We position our
argument not only as a CAFTA-DR obligation but also as a fundamental
building block to Costa Rican commerce and the arts since innovation
and creativity are the basic ingredients of a flourishing business
and cultural environment. We welcome any change, no matter how
incremental, on the part of the AG regarding IPR enforcement.
However, we also believe that the most progress can be gained by
working around the AG, marking progress with cooperative partners in
the quest of small victories now, while preparing for what we hope
will be a more dramatic, positive shift in the attitude of the
office of the AG in the future.
CIANCHETTE