

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05HELSINKI1047, CODEL HOBSON VISIT TO FINLAND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05HELSINKI1047.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05HELSINKI1047 | 2005-09-29 13:01 | 2011-04-24 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Helsinki |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HELSINKI 001047
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OREP ENRG PREL FI EUN
SUBJECT: CODEL HOBSON VISIT TO FINLAND
------------------------
Introduction and Summary
------------------------
¶1. Summary. CODEL Hobson -- House Appropriations Energy and
Water Development Subcommittee Chairman David Hobson (R-OH),
Representative Ed Pastor (D-AZ), Representative Marion Berry
(D-AR), Representative James Clyburn (D-SC), and
Representative Phil Gingrey (R-GA) -- visited Finland,
August 18-21. On August 19, the CODEL met with Taisto
Turunen, Director General, Energy Department, Ministry of
Trade and Industry (MTI). Turunen warmly welcomed the
Delegation to Finland and Representative Hobson remarked
that one of the Delegation's principal objectives was to
learn more about Finland's nuclear energy policy, including
its nuclear waste disposal strategies. More specifically,
Representative Hobson argued that the United States has a
unique "window of opportunity" to re-think the direction of
its own nuclear energy policy in an effort to confront
rising gasoline prices and curb fossil fuel emissions. The
Delegation also visited Eurajoki for briefings on the new
Olkiluoto nuclear power plant, its repository for reactor
operating waste, and an underground rock characterization
and research facility. The Delegation concluded its visit
with a briefing by the Director-General of Finland's
Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK), Jukka
Laaksonen. End Summary.
¶2. Issues covered during the visit included Finland's
national nuclear energy and nuclear waste disposal
strategies; selection and licensing processes for repository
sites; the process for securing municipality support for
repository construction; radiation standards for licensing
repositories; canister design, transportation and storage;
and Finland's future nuclear energy strategies.
¶3. The Finns, who now are building a fifth nuclear reactor
in Eurajoki (and the first nuclear power plant on either
side of the Atlantic in at least a decade), agreed with the
CODEL that nuclear power has an important role to play in
the search for cleaner (low carbon) energy sources. They
stressed, however, that every country had to devise its own
strategies for managing nuclear energy and waste
requirements. The Finnish "experience" was hardly
applicable for the United States as geographical,
geological, and meteorological factors in both countries
were different, not to mention the existence of diverse
political and legislative systems in both countries. The
national consensus in Finland was to pursue a nuclear energy
policy that reduced carbon dioxide emissions and increased
nuclear power production to meet the greenhouse gas emission
targets set for Finland in the Kyoto Protocol. In addition,
the Finns highlighted the cost effectiveness of their
nuclear energy policy and its market/consumer-driven nature
that relies on extensive input from all the principal
players in Finland's public and private sectors.
--------------------------------------------- ---
Meeting with MTI Director General Taisto Turunen
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶4. Turunen gave the CODEL a brief overview of the
production, consumption, and supply trends underpinning
Finland's energy policy. He explained that Finland's energy
sector is driven by active market forces in the highly
competitive Nordic region. (Note: The Electricity Market
Act, which came into force in 1995, has resulted in the
deregulation of the Finnish electricity market for three
million electricity consumers, thus allowing them to choose
the sources of their electricity supply.) Representative
Pastor asked about which authority sets electricity prices
in Finland; in response, Turunen noted that there was no
regulation of electricity prices as they were driven by the
market. Representative Hobson inquired about the sources of
financing for Finland's nuclear power plants and Turunens
reply emphasized the role of the private sector and
consumers as the primary financiers. He said that the
Finnish Government does not provide any economic
contributions or financial guarantees for the project.
¶5. Turunen further remarked that Finlands high energy
consumption is attributable to the energy-intensive
structure of Finnish industry, high standards of living, a
very cold climate, and long transportation distances.
Finland remains heavily dependent on imported energy, which
in 2004 accounted for 67 per cent of all energy consumed in
the country. (Note: Finland imports electricity from
Norway, Russia and Sweden.) To meet Finlands current and
future energy requirements, Turunen said that the Finnish
government was forced to examine other sources of energy,
y,
such as nuclear power and biofuels. Finnish forecasts
predict that the construction of Finlands third nuclear
power plant in Eurajoki (Olkiluoto site) with an output of
1600 MW will be completed in 2009. With its completion,
nuclear power will undoubtedly emerge as one of Finlands
principal energy sources. Turunen dismissed the notion, at
this time, that Finland had plans to build a sixth nuclear
power plant.
¶6. During Turunens presentation, Representative Hobson
also emphasized the importance of attracting American
university students into highly technical fields, such as
nuclear engineering, and inquired whether the Finnish
educational system produced enough graduates in these
specialized areas. Turunen replied that there were no
shortages of qualified engineering students in Finland. He
also noted with some pride that Finlands nuclear energy
policy was widely accepted by the Finnish public. (Note:
Turunen cited a 46 per cent approval rate and 25 per cent
ent
disapproval rate for nuclear power in Finland. High
approval ratings appear to be rooted in the widespread
belief amongst the Finnish public that nuclear power remains
safe as there have been no minor or major nuclear
environmental incidents in Finland thus far. End note.)
¶7. Representative Pastor asked about the licensing
processes for the new nuclear power plant, specifically, who
was responsible for the authorization of the construction
license. Turunen replied that the Council of State grants
the license and, in reply, Representative Hobson made the
observation that there were far too many legal challenges to
licensing applications in the United States. Turunen argued
that the Finnish way: the achievement of a popular
national consensus on any given issue precluded any
effective legal motions to block government plans in the
nuclear energy policy area.
--------------------------------------
Visit to Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant
--------------------------------------
¶8. The CODEL next met with Posivas Communications Manager,
Timo Seppala. Posiva is responsible for the
characterization of sites for final disposal of spent
nuclear fuel and the eventual construction and operation of
the repository. It is owned by Fortum (60 per cent stake),
a leading energy company in the Nordic countries and Baltic
rim, as well as TVO (40 per cent stake), an electricity
production company. The CODEL was given an opportunity to
speak to local politicians and businessmen from the
municipality and a trade promoter about the nature of their
political decision making processes and location and safety
issue deliberations. (Note: Each Finnish participant was in
favor of the construction of a new nuclear plant and
repository.) The politicians stressed the important role
the local municipality played during the initial and final
consultations to locate another nuclear power plant and
nuclear fuel repository at the Olkiluoto site. The
politicians remarked that unemployment was high in the
region (10.6 per cent) and that there was an economic
rationale for building another power plant and repository on
the same site. The local municipality also hoped that the
creation of new jobs would, in turn, stimulate the local
economic environment.
¶9. The CODEL was given a unique opportunity to visit
Olkiluotos low and intermediate level waste repository.
Completed in 1992, the repository was built to house all the
operational waste that is produced during the operating life
of the present Olkiluoto nuclear power units. Once the
waste generated by these plants has been disposed of the
tunnels and shafts leading to the repositories will be
filled and sealed. The CODEL asked Seppala to explain the
components of the final disposal canister; he, in turn,
referred the CODEL to the model of a final disposal canister
which had a double-layered copper/cast iron construction and
cost approximately $120,000 each.
¶10. The CODELs brief drive-by visit to a deep underground
rock characterization and research facility (ONKALO) was an
opportunity for Seppala to discuss the nature of the site
confirmation investigations for spent fuel disposal. Posiva
aims to have the repository operational by 2020 so that
disposal can commence.
--------------------------------------------- -------
Meeting with STUKs Director General Jukka Laaksonen
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶11. Laaksonen gave an extensive presentation on the
management of nuclear waste in Finland. He stressed the
need for the safe disposal of nuclear waste and spent fuel
by using proven, current technologies as well as the desire
not to leave nuclear waste as a burden for future
generations. His support for what he described as an
ethical dimension of Finlands nuclear energy policy became
obvious when he noted that this generation must take care
of its own waste. He also pointed out that it was critical
critical
for Finland to manage its nuclear waste without foreign
support. In this context, he highlighted the continued
relevance of the two major principles underlying Finlands
Nuclear Energy Act (1994): (1) nuclear waste generated in
Finland shall be handled, stored and permanently disposed of
in Finland, and (2) nuclear waste generated elsewhere than
in Finland, shall not be handled, stored or permanently
disposed of in Finland.
¶12. Finland currently provides for the permanent disposal
of low and medium level nuclear waste at two disposal
repositories (Olkiluoto and Loviisa), which are located at a
depth of 60-100 meters. There are plans to store spent fuel
in a new repository located in Olkiluoto (to be completed in
2020) at a depth of 500 meters. When asked by a CODEL
staffer to compare U.S. and Finnish permanent disposal
plans, Laaksonen noted that Finlands plan took all factors,
technical and political into account. Representative Hobson
son
asked whether STUK had examined French recycling efforts as
an option for disposing spent fuel. Laaksonen argued that
cost factors prohibited the implementation of a similar
operation in Finland. Hobson also argued that it would be
useful for the United States to launch a review of whether
more cost effective alternatives could be found for nuclear
waste disposal canisters. Laaksonen replied that STUK was
confident that double-layered copper/cast iron disposal
canisters, placed in a bed of bentonite, offered the safest
and most effective protection for the disposal of nuclear
waste.
¶13. When asked by Representative Hobson whether any Finnish
lawyers ever challenged the government about its nuclear
energy or waste disposal policies, Laaksonen remarked that
Finnish lawyers were not as powerful as in the United States
and that hardly any issue pertaining to this area ever ended
up in the Finnish court system. The CODEL acknowledged with
great interest Laaksonens remark that national governments
were rejecting efforts by the EU to coordinate European
guidelines for nuclear energy and nuclear waste disposal.
According to Laaksonen, the only pertinent international
organization was the International Atomic Energy Agency,
whose guidelines Finland adhered to.
¶14. The CODEL has cleared this cable.
MACK
K