

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08BRASILIA1590, THE BRAZIL-RUSSIA PARTNERSHIP: COFFEE AND SYMPATHY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08BRASILIA1590.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08BRASILIA1590 | 2008-12-12 15:03 | 2011-02-13 00:12 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Brasilia |
VZCZCXYZ0026
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHBR #1590/01 3471552
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 121552Z DEC 08
FM AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3083
INFO RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 4305
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0384
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 6982
RUEHSO/AMCONSUL SAO PAULO 3197
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0285
C O N F I D E N T I A L BRASILIA 001590
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/BSC
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/10/2018
TAGS: PREL MASS ETRD EAGR ENGR BR RS
SUBJECT: THE BRAZIL-RUSSIA PARTNERSHIP: COFFEE AND SYMPATHY
REF: MOSCOW 3526
Classified By: DCM Lisa Kubiske. Reason 1.5(D)
¶1. (C) SUMMARY. The late November visit to Brazil by Russian President Medvedev provided an opportunity for both countries to express their interest in enhanced economic ties, science and defense cooperation, energy and development of the BRIC grouping as a more regular international forum. Brazil and Russia used Medvedev,s visit and the meeting of the Intergovernmental Commission on Economic Cooperation that preceded it as a means of evaluating their current relationship and exploring areas of potential for increased partnership. Working with Russia, another large country with an expanding economy, is politically attractive to Brazil, which aspires to the sort of regional leadership (and permanent UNSC seat) that Russia has. Russia also provides a growing market for Brazilian exports, including meat and coffee, as well as a source of technology for Brazilian industry. Although Medvedev,s visit highlighted these areas of potential, Russian-Brazil cooperation remains more theoretical than actual. Brazilians cite the difficulty of doing business with Russia, diverging interests in such areas as alternative fuels and Russia,s backing of Hugo Chavez as obstacles to progress. The Medvedev visit was widely seen by Brazilians as successful in terms of the number of declarations in principle that cooperation would be pursued, rather than because of any concrete results. While Brazil,s decision to purchase twelve Russian helicopters was heralded as indicative of a new strategic partnership, Brazilian officials have privately referred to the purchase as a &token.8 Although the declaration of the Presidents made much of areas for future collaboration, it was notably silent on the current financial crisis, a key omission in light of the importance of oil prices to Russia,s economy, the effects already being experienced by Brazil's export sector, and the role both aspire to play in resolving the crisis. The relationship with Russia will continue to be politically important to Brazil, but partnership will continue to feature more joint declarations than concrete projects. END SUMMARY.
¶2. (C) During a recent discussion at the Ministry for External Relations (MRE), the Director for Europe, Elizabeth Mazzella, described Brazilian feelings toward Russia as &sympathy.8 Brazilians believe that they and Russia have much in common. Both are large, multi-ethnic states with growing economies. In 2002, the two governments launched a &strategic partnership8 that was reaffirmed during President Medvedev,s November 2008 visit to Brazil. While the visit yielded some substantive results, notably Brazil,s decision to purchase combat helicopters, most of what emerged was in the nature of resolutions to explore future cooperation in such diverse areas as energy, the environment, coffee exports and UN reform. Much like the coffee to be exported, such broad declarations, though lacking substance, are much to the Brazilian taste and illustrate Brazil,s political interest in enhancing its sympathetic relationship.
POTENTIAL FOR TRADE ---------------------------------
¶3. (C) When asked about results from the Lula-Medvedev Summit, Brazilian officials cite commercial cooperation as of greatest importance, however, the actual outcomes of the meeting indicate that at present the potential for cooperation greatly exceeds the reality. In 2007, bilateral trade was worth approximately $5 billion, and the Presidents called for its expansion and diversification. For Brazil, the priority will be on exports from its agricultural sector, especially meat products. Russia has restricted Brazil exports, particularly of pork and chicken, based on supposed concerns about food safety but has shown signs of relaxing its restrictions. A Russian food inspection team recently visited Sao Paulo and Brazilian meat packagers have signed agreements to operate two plants in Kaliningrad. The MRE also reports new agreements for the sale of Brazilian trucks and coffee (&In Moscow, they drink too much tea.8) to Russia. The Presidents also agreed to work on an agreement to avoid &double taxation8 to promote business cooperation.
¶4. (SBU) Lula and Medvedev emphasized the energy sector as having "significant potential for cooperation." Gazprom and Lukoil have sent teams to Brazil to try to get a piece of Brazil,s offshore oil action by offering alleged Russian expertise from joint projects with the U.S. to help surmount technical obstacles to exploitation of Brazil,s pre-salt oil reserves. Rosatom has approach the Brazilian Ministry of Energy about Brazil,s plan to build up to eight new nuclear power plants, but the MRE believes Russia to be an unlikely partner because of its unwillingness to transfer technology and its insistence on providing the fuel for Russian built plants. Brazil would prefer to make use of its own uranium reserves and enrichment capabilities. MRE special advisor Marcos Pinta Gama told poloff that Russia had offered assistance with Brazil,s plans to build a nuclear powered submarine, but Defense Minister Jobim considered France a better partner. Brazil was unable to interest the Russians in biofuels and believes Russia,s energy sector will remain centered on oil.
¶5. (C) Russia agreed in principle to assist Brazil,s development of its Satellite Launch Vehicle as a &partner8 for next generation space launch development. In return, the Brazilians expressed interest in partnership in Russia,s satellite navigations system. MRE sources told us that the Intergovernmental Commission had discussed possible Russian use of Brazil,s future satellite launch facility, but that the Russian side had little understanding of the difficulties Brazil faced in building on the proposed site. When told that the land belonged to a group of quilombos (descendents of escaped slaves), the Russian rep had said, &What is the problem? Just pack them up and move them somewhere else.8
DEFENSE COOPERATION -----------------------------------
¶6. (C) Brazil regards Russia as an important potential collaborator in the areas of defense and security, but, as in other areas, &potential8 remains the key concept. Brazil and Russia were able to sign a defense cooperation agreement similar to the one with the U.S. that the MRE has refused to clear on for almost a year. The two governments have also agreed in principle on an information sharing agreement whose negotiation was in the words of a MRE source &surprisingly easy.8
¶7. (C) In Brazilian reporting on the Summit, the headline result was Brazil,s agreement to purchase twelve Mi-35 attack helicopters for &defense of the Amazon.8 While the efficacy of a dozen relatively short range aircraft for such a job is open to debate, the purchase appears to be no more than a political sop to the Russians. Officially, the decision to buy from Russia is portrayed as bringing the benefit of &diversified8 sources of military equipment, but MRE Europe Director Mazzella referred to it as a &token.8 Brazilian military sources have told the Defense Attache Office that the only reason for buying some Russian equipment would be to demonstrate its poor quality in order to have a strong case for not buying more.
THE FELLOW &BRIC8 ROAD --------------------------------------
¶8. (C) One other major result of the Medvedev-Lula meeting from Brazil,s point of view was Russia,s agreement to host a major Summit of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) countries in Yekaterinburg in May or June of next year. At this time, the MRE has no specifics regarding the agenda but regards the meeting as an important step in the development of the BRIC group as a regular international grouping. According to Mazzella, the Russians share Brazil,s interest in enhancing the BRIC group and have been most active in promoting greater group unity. This was reflected in the statement released by the BRIC Ministerial in May 2008 which largely reflected Russian international priorities. Mazzella admitted that the statement was a Russian draft but noted that Brazil contributed the language calling for reform of the UN Security Council. India and China, although they attend the meetings, have not taken as great a role and have shown less interest in going down the road of expanding joint BRIC activity.
UN REFORM -----------------
¶9. (SBU) The Brazilian press showed some disappointment with what was seen as a lack of agreement with Russia on the importance of UN reform -- a term in Brazil understood to mean only inclusion of Brazil as a permanent member of the Security Council. The MRE takes a &glass half full8 view of the Summit, noting that Russia did agree that the UNSC should be enlarged and progress should be rapid. This language is viewed by the GOB as a step forward from the Russians, who have been seen as among the least sympathetic toward Brazil,s aspirations. As one Brazilian diplomat who has served in Moscow put it: &Russia has lots of land and a falling population. Their Security Council seat is what keeps them important.8
STRATEGIC PARTNERS -- OR NOT --------------------------------------------- --
¶10. (C) For many Brazilian leaders, a strategic partnership with Russia makes sense. As are many Russians, Brazilians are fond of rhetoric espousing &multipolarity,8 UN primacy and territorial integrity. Minister for Strategic Planning Roberto Mangabeira Unger has stated repeatedly that Russia is a natural partner and has championed enhancing defense cooperation as a means of lessening presumed dependence on the U.S. Despite the political attraction, the strategic partnership has, much like initiatives to enhance trade, been more in terms of potential than concrete projects.
¶11. (C) From the Brazilian point of view, there are several reasons for caution in the partnership with Russia. The Brazilian military has told Defense Attaches that they believe Russian equipment to be inferior and prone to maintenance problems. The Sukhoi 35 was dropped from the FX2 fighter competition in October because Russia was unwilling to transfer technology. Furthermore, Brazilian Air Force members who participated in discussions with Russia considered their counterparts to be &uninterested in reaching a mutually advantageous deal8 but focused on &winning8 the negotiations. There is also little common ground with Russia on such key issues for Brazil as biofuels and environmental initiatives. Also, Brazilians are wary about what they view as excessive Russian arms sales to Venezuela. With the Chavez government known to be supplying weapons to the FARC, Pinta Gama expressed concern that Chavez is buying more rifles than there are members of the Venezuelan military. Concerned about the lack of control over their extensive borders, many Brazilians regard Russia,s pretext of protecting citizens with recently issued passports as justification for invading Georgia as an unwelcome precedent.
¶12. (C) Comment: Despite the difficulties, the Brazil-Russia relationship offers attractions for both sides. In some ways, Russia is much of what Brazil aspires to be: a major power with a UNSC seat that is the heavyweight among its region,s economies. In Brazil, Russia has a sympathetic government with strong democratic credentials in Latin America that tends to avoid criticism of Russia,s human rights record and heavy handed policies toward its neighbors. The Medvedev visit afforded an opportunity to reaffirm the partnership and announce intentions to pursue cooperation in commerce, defense, energy and science. These announcements serve their political purpose of signaling the importance each country attaches to the relationship but do not necessarily carry much promise of follow through. Lost in the impressive rhetoric on increasing trade and scientific cooperation is the reality of the global financial crisis and its likely affects on both countries and their ability to undertake major new cooperative projects. Brazil and Russia will continue to have sympathy for each other in areas where it is politically advantageous, but substantial cooperation will probably remain on a slower track.
SOBEL