

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA774, SCENESETTER: SECRETARY CHERTOFF'S VISIT TO OTTAWA, MARCH 17,
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA774.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA774 | 2005-03-14 20:08 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000774
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR WHA, WHA/CAN (Wheeler)
DHS OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS (Marmaud)
FOR SECRETARY CHERTOFF FROM AMBASADOR CELLUCCI
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL ETRD ECIN EWWT ASEC CA
SUBJECT: SCENESETTER: SECRETARY CHERTOFF'S VISIT TO OTTAWA, MARCH 17,
2005
¶1. (U) As you prepare for your first meeting in Ottawa
with Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan, I want to
extend my welcome and the Embassy's continuing support
for the dialogue. At a time when Canadians are voicing
concern about the growing role of "border risk" in the
bilateral economic relationship, continued close,
senior-level cooperation between DHS and PSEPC is vital
to keeping up progress in creating the Smart Border.
The Smart Border Action Plan has been one of our most
important policy successes in the past three years, and
I welcome your early visit to our biggest economic
partner and the neighbor with whom we share our longest
and most heavily traveled border. I believe that one
of the most crucial challenges you will face during
your tenure will be to ensure that we implement the
most efficient and secure solution to the
infrastructure crisis looming at the Windsor-Detroit
Gateway, and that we do so as quickly as possible.
¶2. (SBU) You will find the working relationships
between DHS and PSEPC close, professional and
productive. While we tend to look at the border with
security concerns, our counterparts here see the border
as fundamental to their economic prosperity. The
government has therefore stepped up its actions to
ensure we have confidence in the security of our
shared border.
¶3. (SBU) Two constants underlie the government's close
cooperation. First is that their own population does
not share the same sense of concern about the threat or
the urgency in dealing with it, and few in government
are prepared to make the political case to their own
public. Second is that we find the government is very
good at moving through the pieces of the border agenda
which make sense for them, such as Halifax pre-
clearance or a pilot land pre-clearance program (both
of which I support), but it takes a long time for them
to focus on our concerns, such as a shiprider agreement
or security for DHS airport pre-clearance personnel.
--------------------------------------------- ------
Martin's Liberals Experience the Limits of Minority
Government
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶4. (SBU) After governing in majority for more than ten
years under the leadership of Jean Chretien, the
Liberals went to elections June 28, 2004 under the
leadership of Paul Martin. Hurt by a Chretien-era
scandal involving the illegal disbursement of federal
monies in Quebec, the Liberal Party was reduced to
minority status, the first in Canada since 1979. The
Parliamentary session that ended in December
established early on the limits of minority government.
On paper, the normal alignment of the left-of-center
New Democratic Party with the Liberals puts Martin neck-
and-neck with the Conservatives and the Bloc Quebecois.
It became obvious, however, that neither coalition was
automatic; the standard "dictatorship" of the executive
branch under a majority government no longer holds, and
the back bench and opposition enjoy increased clout,
slowing considerably the business of government.
¶5. (SBU) PM Martin's legislative agenda has therefore
been modest so far. Canadians have made it clear that
they do not want elections this year, but if the
government loses a key vote, ready-or-not elections
will follow. Rather than risk this, Martin has decided
to avoid controversial issues such as missile defense,
which he announced to our surprise that Canada will not
participate in, and will tread carefully in the
upcoming vote on same-sex marriage.
¶6. (SBU) Canada's international agenda has been
similarly modest. There is a growing sense among
Canadian elites and certain political circles that the
country should return to its traditional position as a
middle power on the global stage, reversing the
slippage in clout as its attention and resources have
turned inward. This view was strong enough (and the
budget surplus large enough) that Martin announced a
significant increase in defense spending over the next
five years, which should help shore up Canada's
depleted military capabilities. Canada has also been
active in the reconstruction of Afghanistan, and while
domestic politics precluded a direct role in Iraq,
Canadian election officials led the international
observer mission in the January elections, and the
Canadian government has pledged USD 800,000 for the
NATO train and equip mission for the Iraqi military.
--------------------------------------------- ---------
National Security Policy, International Policy Review,
and the Security Budget
--------------------------------------------- ---------
¶7. (U) As incoming Prime Minister in the fall of 2003,
Martin aggressively reorganized Canadian security and
border agencies into a structure similar to that of
DHS, putting Minister McLellan in charge of CBSA, RCMP
and CSIS under the overarching Department of Public
Safety and Emergency Preparedness (PSEPC) and giving
her the title of Deputy Prime Minister. In April 2004,
the government announced a National Security Policy for
Canada, the country's first-ever comprehensive
articulation of its national security interests. These
include the protection of Canada; the safety and
security of Canadians at home and abroad; ensuring that
Canada is not used as a base for threats to her allies;
and contributing to international security
(peacekeeping, nonproliferation).
¶8. (U) Arguing that Canada's international engagement
must merge with national aspirations to deal with a
world where "time and distance have lost their
isolating effect," the government promised to release
an International Policy Statement that would integrate
the country's defense, security, diplomacy, and
trade/development efforts. However, that statement has
not yet emerged, possibly bogged down in interagency
disputes over future resources.
¶9. (U) Nevertheless, border security issues are likely
to remain a priority. The government's 2005 budget,
passed last week, contains an additional CAD 1 billion
(approx. USD 800 million) for the goals outlined in the
National Security Policy. CAD 222 million over five
years is earmarked for maritime security, including
patrol vessels for the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence
Seaway, additional inspections, Emergency Response
Teams for the Great Lakes and increased police presence
in ports, and an additional CAD 88 million will go to
work on the bilateral Container Security Initiative.
Another CAD 433 million over five years will go to
"strengthening the capacity of the Government to
deliver secure and efficient border services."
--------------------------------------------- ---
The Ridge-McLellan Dialogue and the Smart Border Action
Plan
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶10. (SBU) In a relationship colored by Canadian
ambivalence and some perplexing policy reversals, the
Smart Border Action Plan, announced in 2001, has been
one of our greatest bilateral policy successes in my
time here. I encourage you to keep up the pressure for
results -- with the full support of Mission Canada.
Driven by high-level contacts between your predecessor
and Deputy Prime Ministers Manley and McLellan, the two
sides have achieved many of the goals set out in the
Action Plan and have used the framework to develop
productive informal relationships, with important knock-
on effects at local levels.
¶11. (SBU) As a third of Canada's GDP derives from
trade with the U.S., the operation of the border is a
burning issue to government and industry alike. The
"Smart Border" concept enjoys broad support among
business and local governments on both sides of the
border as well as in Ottawa, and has been an important
element in rebuilding public confidence that security
and trade can go hand in hand. In some places, such as
Vancouver, the private sector is driving innovative
pilot programs under the Smart Border framework. I am
optimistic that the security and prosperity agenda
announced by President Bush and PM Martin in December,
to be rolled out later this month, will build on both
the policy and operational achievements and the can-do
approach of the Smart Border process.
¶12. (SBU) We have made progress on a number of fronts
in the past year. In large part because of the efforts
of Mission DHS/CBP officers, most Canadian exporters
successfully navigated the implementation last year of
FDA's prior notice rules under the Bioterrorism
Reporting Act (BTA). FAST uptake is growing, and extra
resources committed to FAST processing should show
concrete results at the borders.
¶13. (SBU) Infrastructure issues, which result as much
from trade growth as from new security requirements,
are likely to remain a challenge. Detroit-Windsor is
the critical choke point and the one that attracts the
most Parliamentary and press attention. In my view,
however, the federal government in Ottawa has not
accorded the problem adequate importance or urgency.
The debate over new border crossings in the region has
been enlivened with publication of the Schwartz Report
recommending an alternative route, but building
consensus among multiple stakeholders on both sides of
the border is likely to be an arduous process, with the
binational study of the issue due to be finished by
2007 at the earliest. In the shorter term, I look
forward to the joint efforts of U.S. and Canadian
agencies to meet the "25% Challenge" posed by Secretary
Ridge and DPM McLellan in December, to reduce border
waiting times by 25% at the Detroit-Windsor crossing.
I hope this initiative will showcase the improvements
already made as well as identify remaining bottlenecks.
¶14. (SBU) Creating a seamless security net at the
border will be a complex and long-term process, which
will have to navigate the legal and sovereignty issues
posed by reverse inspection and other efforts to
develop joint processing, as well as both the technical
and privacy issues surrounding information sharing.
Making it work is a top priority for Mission Canada as
a whole, and I hope that your meeting with DPM McLellan
will lay the foundations for a long and productive
relationship that can effectively drive progress.
CELLUCCI