

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SANJOSE859, COSTA RICA: PLENTIFUL WATER, POOR MANAGEMENT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SANJOSE859.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08SANJOSE859 | 2008-10-31 12:12 | 2011-03-21 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0859/01 3051250
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 311250Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0228
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000859
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA, WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC, EEB AND OES
PLEASE PASS TO EPA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ECON ETRD OVIP PGOV PINR PREL CS SENV
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA: PLENTIFUL WATER, POOR MANAGEMENT
¶1. (U) SUMMARY: A rain-rich climatic regime supplies Costa Rica
with more than enough water. However, the growing threat of
contamination and chronic underinvestment in infrastructure
threatens potable water resources, and undermines Costa Rica's
"clean and green" international image. Urban expansion in the San
Jose area and the rapid expansion of private real estate
developments along the Pacific Coast (in many cases associated with
AmCit investors) test the capacity of the overlapping government
agencies responsible for protecting, regulating, developing,
maintaining, and delivering water resources. The public sector
recognizes the need for legislative reform and public investment
while also engaging with the private sector to tap capital in order
to develop new water projects. Nonetheless, given other GOCR
priorities (such as domestic security) competing for legislative
attention, and the diminished political capital of the Arias
administration, systemic reform is unlikely before the next
elections in 2010. END SUMMARY.
-------------------------------
98 PERCENT RUNNING WATER . . .
-------------------------------
¶2. (U) According to the latest "State of the Nation" (SotN#13)
report, nearly all of Costa Rica's population -- 98 percent --
receives water from pipes and almost all Costa Rican households --
94 percent - have access to running water. The Costa Rican Water
and Sewage Institute (AyA), a national but autonomous public
utility, states that 82 percent of the population receives potable
water and that 16 percent receives untreated water classified by AyA
as unpotable.
------------------------------
BUT GROWING WATER DEMAND . . .
------------------------------
¶3. (U) Costa Rica's rapid urban development has overtaken
institutional capacity to develop and maintain the potable water
resource. Resort development along much of the Pacific Coast has
largely exhausted nearby existing fresh-water sources during the
December-May dry season, prompting calls for major investment in new
projects. The San Jose Greater Metropolitan Area obtains about 80
percent of its potable water from aquifers that are reported to have
reached their extraction capacity, likewise prompting calls for
major investment.
¶4. (U) Yet, Costa Rica's geography is such that even those areas of
Costa Rica with potable water deficits during a portion of the year
have clear potential to tap one of many sources: areas inland of
the Pacific coastal boom towns have underexploited aquifers; tourist
boom towns have obvious access to sea water; numerous rivers drain
into the Pacific and the Caribbean; and the mountains north and
south of the capital city of San Jose are laced with many streams.
Costa Rica's looming water shortage is thus not due to major
physical limitations.
------------------------------
. . . NO ONE CLEARLY IN CHARGE
------------------------------
¶5. (U) The water sector in Costa Rica suffers from a crisis in
governance. Several governmental entities share overlapping (and
sometimes conflicting) responsibility for water management. The
Water Department of the Ministry of Environment, Energy and
Telecommunications (MINAET) is arguably the logical custodian of
water resources, but it is currently an underfunded bureaucracy with
a confused mandate. The GOCR assigns responsibility for reviewing
water quality to the Ministry of Health. The National Irrigation
and Surface Water Service (SENARA) has responsibility for the
evaluation of groundwater resources and for the country's largest
agricultural water project. The National Forest Finance Fund
(FONAFIFO), a department within MINAE, manages the payment of
environmental services to preserve aquifer recharge areas. The
Public Services Regulation Authority (ARESEP) approves water usage
rates charged to individual users by the various system operators.
¶6. (U) Other institutions that regulate land use, and therefore
impact water management, include the National Parks service, the
Forestry Department of MINAE, the Ministry of Agriculture (MAG), the
Institute of Housing and Urban Development (INVU), and local
municipalities. Though these agencies have responsibility for
various aspects of water management, none/none of these agencies
actually deliver water to the user.
¶7. (U) On the operational side, AyA manages water systems serving 46
percent of the Costa Rican population and has nominal legal control
over the systems operated by 1,800+ independent community water
associations ("ASADAS") that serve another 25 percent of the
population. Municipalities manage another 18 percent, the regional
Heredia Public Utility Company (ESPH) has close to 5 percent, and
the remaining roughly 6 percent receive water on their own or are
not in the survey. (Data from SOTN#12, pg 233).
---------------------------------
. . . REVENUE COLLECTION PROBLEMS
---------------------------------
¶8. (U) The Arias Administration adopted water usage and discharge
fees by decree in 2006, yet, to date, only private holders of water
concessions have been paying the fee. Public institutions avoid
payment of the water usage fee, while the discharge fee was
re-defined and is slated to go into effect late this year. Jose
Miguel Zeledon, current director of the MINAET Water Department,
continues to be optimistic that the water usage fee will yield a
total of $10 million per year by 2013 when it is fully in effect,
with 43 percent generated by SENARA, 29 percent from hydroelectric
projects (mostly from the Costa Rican Electrical Institute (ICE)),
13 percent from water systems (AyA, ASADAS, and municipalities) and
the remainder from individual wells and agricultural use. The Water
Department will spend half those funds on the department itself, and
dedicate the other half to reforestation and conservation projects.
-----------------------
. . . AND CONTAMINATION
-----------------------
¶9. (U) Contamination of the water resource has become increasingly
evident in recent years, contradicting Costa Rica's international
reputation as a "clean and green" country. Fecal contamination is
universal in urban waterways; the Tarcoles River leading from the
Central Valley to the Central Pacific coast has been categorized as
"San Jose's Open Sewer." AyA's own statistics for 2007 show that
only 3.5 percent of Costa Rica's sewage is treated under operator
control, underscoring the extent of the problems:
Sewage Lines & Treatment Plant with Operator 3.5%
Latrines 3.5%
Sewage Lines & Treatment Plant w/o Operator 4.9%
Sewage Lines w/o Treatment Plant 20.1%
Septic Tanks 67.3%
AyA estimates that 50 percent of the septic tanks don't work. Thus,
AyA claims that 37 percent of the waste water in Costa Rica -- 3.5
percent plus 33.5 percent -- is treated.
¶10. (U) Aquifer contamination also threatens water quality. Not
only may river water and badly functioning septic tanks eventually
introduce fecal contaminants into the aquifers, but gasoline storage
tanks have already shown the potential for pollution. Agriculture
pollution is a recurrent danger given that Costa Rica's relatively
wealthy agricultural sector, geared for export production, makes
heavy use of agricultural chemicals. In the coastal zones, salt
water intrusion into the aquifers is an imminent threat as lax
management of the aquifers leads to excessive drawdown and exposure
to sea water contamination.
¶11. (U) Although the problem has been building for years, fecal
contamination of coastal waters has become a front-page issue. A
series of tests off of the Pacific coast tourist mecca of Tamarindo
Beach revealed high levels of contamination along the beachfront and
in the ocean. There is no public sewer system in Tamarindo and many
hotels ignore the requirement to treat their own water. Recently,
water tests at the Central Pacific resort town of Jaco revealed
fecal contamination exceeding 1100 parts per 100 milliliters of
water. (COMMENT: the recommended EPA threshold for swimming is 200
parts per 100 milliliters of water. END COMMENT.)
¶12. (U) Health officials finally responded by closing and citing
establishments in the Tamarindo area, while AyA officials continue
to test for pollutants along the coast. The five-star Hotel Resort
Allegro Papagayo was partially closed from February to mid-September
2008 after repeated water pollution violations. The port city of
Puntarenas, further to the south, dumps most of its sewage in the
estuary adjacent to the city, prompting AyA to include a sewage
system for that city among its future projects.
--------------------------------
FINANCING AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR
--------------------------------
¶13. (U) Private water suppliers in Costa Rica are severely limited.
All fresh water in Costa Rica is legal property of the state.
Landowners do not own the water that originates on/under their land
or flows over it, and groups of private landowners who provide
potable water or sewage services to themselves are on shaky legal
ground. Recent legal opinion has tended to confirm AyA's long
insistence that it, the municipalities, and regional authorities are
the sole legal providers of these services and everyone else (ASADAS
and landowner groups) must operate at the pleasure of AyA.
¶14. (U) Although AyA insists upon legal dominance in the water
sector, its true power is reflected by its ability to harness
private capital to develop public water infrastructure. According
to AyA Legal Director Rodolfo Lizano, AyA's current public-private
efforts are based on a 1968 law that stipulates when urban
infrastructure is not already built, a developer may build that
infrastructure and deliver it to AyA. In exchange, for a period of
5 years, subsequent land developers must first pay the developer who
built the infrastructure.
¶15. (U) One project, near the Manuel Antonio National Park on the
Pacific coast, has been successfully built and delivered to AyA.
Further north in the Coco/Sardinal area on the Gulf of Papagayo,
another project stalled because the inland community (Sardinal)
which is to supply water to a beach resort (Coco), protested.
Nevertheless, AyA and the Arias Administration acted decisively to
persuade community leaders that the project benefits the community.
It is likely to be finished. Two other projects in the Tamarindo
area will likewise be financed in the same manner, comments Lizano,
and are ready to move ahead once the controversy in Sardinal passes.
¶16. (U) The Executive President of AyA, Ricardo Sancho, has been a
strong proponent of public/private financing schemes and has also
commented that Costa Rica needs to be more willing than it has been
in the past to go into debt to build water and sewage projects. An
example is the $230 million sewer system project designed to serve a
portion of the San Jose Metropolitan Area. The Japan Development
Bank agreed to a $130 million loan (AyA pays $30 million; the GOCR
pays $100 million). AyA will finance the remaining $100 million
through rates levied on users of the system. This project is also
an illustration of the dangers inherent in the requirement that the
national legislature approve all sovereign debt. Despite the
manifest need for modern sewage treatment, this legislative project
languished for years and was finally approved in October of 2006
when Costa Rica was about to lose the Japanese loan.
-------------------------
ANY PROPOSALS FOR REFORM?
-------------------------
¶17. (U) Costa Rica's existing water law is over 60 years old, yet
concerted attempts to draft a new water law have stalled. Dr. Pedro
Leon, a top environmental advisor to President Arias, told Emboffs
on October 14 that the GOCR hopes to push a new "Water Resources
Law" through for approval in 2009 in concert with President Arias'
"Peace With Nature" initiative. The debate over water resources has
generated heated turf battles between AyA, ASADAs, ESPH, MINAET, the
Health Ministry, SENARA, and ARESEP.
¶18. (U) In addition, more philosophical objections are enunciated by
Carlos Manuel Rodriguez, ex-Minister of MINAET during ex-President
Pacheco's administration, who states that the current water bill is
more "commercial" (and therefore less acceptable) than the law
drafted during Rodriguez's tenure at MINAET. Rodriguez believes that
the legislature will not approve the water bill as currently
proposed. Nevertheless, both he and the Arias administration agree
on two types of water use payments (see para 8 above): a water use
fee ("canon de aprovechamiento de agua") and a pollution or
discharge fee ("canon de vertimiento al agua").
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶19. (SBU) Costa Rica's water sector presents great potential that is
stymied by ineffective law, interagency bickering, and AyA's
struggles to exert operational control while ceding a portion of its
expansion to private/public agreements. As with other public
infrastructure problems here (i.e., regarding highways, ports, and
electrical production), the continued public demand for potable
water will force actors in the sector to do something. The need for
large water and sewer projects in the booming Guanacaste tourist
areas and the rapidly growing San Jose Central Valley is generally
accepted, as is AyA's role as the lead institution in managing those
projects.
¶20. (SBU) However, we believe that any reform to existing water laws
is unlikely to advance during the remaining 18 months of the Arias
administration. There are simply too many more pressing legislative
and political challenges to address, such as the growing domestic
security problem and the impact of the world financial crisis. The
conflicting challenges of delivering improved water and wastewater
services in Costa Rica will likely wait until the next
administration takes office in 2010.
CIANCHETTE