

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06MEXICO6085, PRESIDENT FOX'S NATIONAL SECURITY LEGACY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06MEXICO6085.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06MEXICO6085 | 2006-10-25 17:05 | 2011-02-12 12:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Mexico |
Appears in these articles: http://wikileaks.jornada.com.mx/notas/el-legado-del-presidente-fox/ |
VZCZCXRO9923
RR RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #6085/01 2981705
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 251705Z OCT 06
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3881
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE
RHEHOND/DIR ONDCP WASHINGTON DC
RHMFIUU/CDR USNORTHCOM
RUEWMCS/US MARSHALS SERVICE WASHINGTON DC
RHMFIUU/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEAHLA/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHMCSUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
83079
2006-10-25 17:05:00
06MEXICO6085
Embassy Mexico
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
06MEXICO3117|06MEXICO3296|06MEXICO3297|06MEXICO3305
VZCZCXRO9923
RR RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #6085/01 2981705
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 251705Z OCT 06
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3881
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE
RHEHOND/DIR ONDCP WASHINGTON DC
RHMFIUU/CDR USNORTHCOM
RUEWMCS/US MARSHALS SERVICE WASHINGTON DC
RHMFIUU/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEAHLA/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHMCSUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 MEXICO 006085
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV KCRM SNAR PTER SMIG MX
SUBJECT: PRESIDENT FOX'S NATIONAL SECURITY LEGACY
REF: A. MEXICO 3296
¶B. MEXICO 3117
¶C. MEXICO 3297
¶D. MEXICO 3305
-------
Summary
-------
¶1. (SBU) This is the first in a series of four cables
assessing the key accomplishments of President Vicente Fox
Quesada during his six years in office, including the
expansion of bilateral cooperation that helped Mexico advance
in areas of greatest interest to the USG. It focuses on
progress made in national security; the economy and social
welfare; governance, human rights and foreign policy; and the
environment. Fox's record--which will not be complete until
December 1, 2006 when he leaves office--was far from perfect,
and while a brief assessment of Fox's failures or
shortcomings is included at the end of each report, the
emphasis of these cables is on the principal achievements
that moved Mexico forward between 2000 and today.
¶2. (SBU) Summary continued: During the Fox years, Mexico made
steady progress in the area of national security, and the
level of USG-GOM law enforcement cooperation was
substantially improved when compared with the situation prior
to Fox's election. After September 11, 2001, the GOM
responded to USG requests to prioritize counterterrorism (CT)
cooperation, which resulted in an increased emphasis on
border security projects focused, inter alia, on special
interest aliens (SIAs) and alien smuggling. The GOM expanded
and solidified the professionalization of federal law
enforcement institutions, and Fox oversaw a dramatic increase
in arrests of drug kingpins. Drug interdiction also
improved. The number of annual extraditions nearly tripled
from the beginning to the end of his presidency, and
deportations increased markedly. This paper does not address
bilateral military cooperation, and a discussion of Mexico's
persistent security deficiencies is limited to the comment
paragraph. End summary.
------------------------------------------
Law Enforcement Infrastructure Development
------------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) During the Fox sexenio, Mexico restructured and
strengthened the institutions directly responsible for
fighting organized crime. The GOM pushed forward with
reforms aimed at establishing more professional police
institutions and promoting greater accountability and
transparency. It created the Federal Investigative Agency
(AFI) and further developed the Federal Preventive Police
(PFP), which have both worked closely with U.S. law
enforcement. New legislation gave the Attorney General's
Office (PGR) and AFI more autonomy to investigate, arrest and
prosecute major criminals. Several PGR entities established
professional cadres of investigators, analysts, and
technicians, and AFI agents played a central role in the
investigation and arrest of drug traffickers, violent
kidnappers, and corrupt officials. As a result of
coordination and cooperation between the USG and PGR/AFI
Special Investigative Units (SIUs), there were approximately
19 DEA tier 1 and tier 2 targets arrested between 2002 and
¶2006.
--------------------------------------
Border Security and Safety Cooperation
--------------------------------------
¶4. (SBU) Under Fox, USG-GOM law enforcement cooperation
became more effective and more routine, characterized by
enhanced communication channels and greater
information-sharing, including about SIAs. The Mexico-U.S.
Border Partnership signed in March 2002 served as an initial
framework to institutionalize border security cooperation and
was later incorporated into the Security and Prosperity
Partnership (SPP). Under the Smart Border Action Plan, Fox's
government implemented the Advance Passenger Information
MEXICO 00006085 002 OF 005
System (APIS) in 2004, establishing an important screening
and enforcement tool that allows the USG and GOM to exchange
"real time" information regarding airline passengers
perceived as threats to national security. The GOM's
continued cooperation in APIS has led to the capture of
approximately 50 fugitives and represents a significant step
in coordinating aviation and border security.
¶5. (SBU) In August 2005, the USG and GOM also implemented the
Operation Against Smugglers Initiative on Safety and Security
(OASSIS), a standardized prosecution program to identify and
prosecute smugglers and human traffickers on both sides of
the border and save lives of migrants put at risk by criminal
organizations. The USG has turned over to the GOM 497 cases
to date for prosecution (approximately 300 cases have been
accepted), demonstrating its value as a tool that reduces the
number of human smugglers operating along the border.
¶6. (SBU) The Border Security and Public Safety Working Group
formed in March 2006 has become another important tool for
bilateral cooperation, establishing protocols between both
governments to respond to critical incidents and emergencies
along the border. It remains in the pilot stage. The USG
was able to further develop its border security relationship
with the GOM under President Fox through training programs,
which focused on using non-intrusive inspection equipment,
detecting weapons of mass destruction, and identifying
fraudulent documents.
-----------------
Counter-Terrorism
-----------------
¶7. (SBU) Information sharing on CT issues under the Fox
administration has been commendable (ref A). USG law
enforcement agencies have enjoyed particularly strong
relationships with the Center for National Security
Investigations (CISEN--the GOM civilian intelligence and
security service) and the National Migration Institute (INM).
The GOM worked with the USG to enhance aviation, border,
maritime, and transportation security, secure critical
infrastructure, and combat terrorism financing. The March
2005 launching of the SPP, which consists of ten
security-related goals within its Security Pillar,
institutionalized mechanisms for information exchange across
agencies and levels of our respective governments.
¶8. (SBU) Among the most important new efforts developed, the
GOM coordinated with the USG on information sharing of
APIS-derived data and the use of its Integrated System for
Migratory Operations (SIOM). Efforts are now underway to
expand the dissemination of the APIS-derived information
automatically and directly to CISEN. The USG and GOM also
agreed to share on an ad hoc basis biometric data for
inclusion in the Integrated Automated Fingerprint
Identification System (IAFIS). Under President Fox, there
were no incidents detected in which terrorists sought to
exploit Mexican territory to attack the U.S. or U.S interests.
-----------------
Counter-Narcotics
-----------------
¶9. (SBU) The Fox administration has been especially effective
in stepping up Mexico's efforts against narcotrafficking and
the cartels it regards as national security threats. Between
2000 and 2005, GOM authorities arrested more than 57,000 drug
traffickers, including kingpins such as Osiel Cardenas
Guillen of the Gulf Cartel and Benjamin Arellano Felix of the
Tijuana Cartel, in ongoing efforts to dismantle major drug
organizations operating in Mexico. Most major indicators of
counter-narcotics effectiveness increased during the Fox
administration when compared to statistical data for the
preceding Zedillo government. Average annual eradication of
opium poppies increased from 16,002 hectares during 1995-2000
to 19,168 hectares during 2001 to 2005 (complete data is not
yet available for 2006). Eradication of marijuana rose
markedly, from 26,437 (1995-2000) to 31,550 hectares
(2001-2005). Average annual heroin seizures totaled 324
MEXICO 00006085 003 OF 005
kilos (2001-05) versus 221 kilos (1995-2000). The annual
rate of cocaine seizures is the only major indicator that
decreased slightly during the Fox years compared to the
previous administration, at 24.5 tons versus 25.9 tons.
(Note: Since cocaine is not produced in Mexico, however, this
variation may be attributable to changes in international
trafficking patterns. End note).
¶10. (SBU) Under President Fox, the GOM and the USG achieved
unprecedented levels of cooperation in deploying
infrastructure to inhibit illicit narcotics trafficking (ref
B). Using a combination of GOM and State/INL funds, Mexico
installed 86 contraband detection units using sophisticated
gamma ray technology at strategic points along our common
border. Other INL-funded efforts led to the addition of new
and refurbished helicopters to augment the PGR's interdiction
fleet; provision of vehicles and training to AFI for use in
safe destruction of clandestine methamphetamine and other
drug laboratories; the furnishing of telecommunications,
computer and command/control infrastructure to various
components of the PGR; and specialized training for thousands
of Mexican law enforcement and aviation support officers in
anti-narcotics operations and techniques.
----------------
Money Laundering
----------------
¶11. (SBU) The USG developed strong working relationships with
the Financial Intelligence Unit of the PGR and its companion
unit in the Mexican Treasury (Hacienda) in combating money
laundering, terrorist financing, and narcotics trafficking.
Notable was the task force deployment to the Mexico City
airport that included elements from AFI, Mexican customs, and
prosecuting attorneys from the PGR's anti-money laundering
criminal prosecution section. The Bulk Currency Smuggling
Initiative was launched in July 2002 and has resulted in $57
million in seizures of bulk cash transfers at Mexican ports
of entry, including seizures associated with tax evasion,
narcotics trafficking, public corruption, bank fraud, and
alien smuggling. These seizures have resulted in the
identification and dismantling of several money laundering
cells. Under Fox, the first joint U.S.-GOM wire intercept
investigation was also initiated targeting a money laundering
group in Mexico with connections to the U.S.
¶12. (SBU) Despite excellent USG-GOM cooperation, money
laundering remains a significant problem in Mexico, and the
USG would like to see more Mexican resources dedicated to
tackling the problem. While our cooperation with the Fox
administration reached new heights, the underlying legal
framework remains inadequate, and the Fox administration was
unable to improve that framework for a variety of political
reasons. Specifically, the Embassy would like to see changes
being made to the judicial processes required for Hacienda's
Financial Intelligence Unit to certify money laundering
crimes, prosecutorial ability to "layer" or "stack" several
related charges including money laundering, better efforts to
stop federal income tax evasion in association with major
narcotics trafficking and other federal crimes, and the
establishment of a specific Mexican penal charge against
money laundering connected with terrorism.
----------------------------------------
Extradition under the Fox Administration
----------------------------------------
¶13. (SBU) Bilateral cooperation in returning fugitives to the
United States by extradition and other legal means increased
significantly under Fox. Although extradition in Mexico is a
judicial process often delayed by a defendant's right to
appeal, the GOM has advocated strongly on behalf of the USG
before the Mexican courts. In the phase of the extradition
process requiring a decision from the executive, the GOM also
has made clear its firm policy to grant the extradition of
criminals, regardless of their nationality, to face justice
where they have committed crimes. The GOM has used its
immigration laws to expeditiously deport fugitives to the
U.S. in lieu of the often lengthy extradition process.
MEXICO 00006085 004 OF 005
¶14. (SBU) This improved cooperation can be seen in the annual
numbers of fugitives extradited by Mexico to the U.S., which
have increased in each of the last six calendar years:
--2001 = 17 fugitives extradited
--2002 = 25 fugitives extradited
--2003 = 31 fugitives extradited
--2004 = 34 fugitives extradited
--2005 = 41 fugitives extradited
--2006 = 50 fugitives extradited (January - October 24)
Of the 198 fugitives extradited by Mexico during the Fox
sexenio, 120 have been Mexican citizens, with the majority
wanted in the U.S. for the most serious of crimes. By
comparison, only 68 fugitives, including 8 Mexican citizens,
were extradited by Mexico to the U.S. during the Zedillo
administration (1995-2000).
¶15. (SBU) Excellent cooperation between the USG and the INM
and AFI, as well as Mexican authorities' aggressive use of
their immigration laws to deport foreign fugitives to the
U.S., resulted in an unprecedented 198 fugitives being
deported to the U.S. in 2005. Although exact figures are not
available, this speedy alternative to extradition was used
much more sparingly in previous administrations.
¶16. (SBU) In 2006, the Mexican Supreme Court issued landmark
decisions removing significant obstacles to extradition,
including a former prohibition on the extradition of
fugitives who faced life imprisonment without the possibility
of parole in the United States. In 2001, the Mexican Supreme
Court reaffirmed the executive's exclusive discretion to
grant or deny extradition based on the Mexican nationality of
the defendant, a right which the GOM made full use of.
¶17. (SBU) The Fox government did not extradite a major
narcotics cartel leader to the United States. While
important leaders of Mexican drug cartels were arrested in
Mexico, they face Mexican criminal charges in addition to
extradition requests by the U.S. (Note: Mexico has extradited
high-profile fugitives including Francisco Rafael Arellano
Felix, cop-killer Raul Gomez Garcia, and even drug
traffickers charged under the U.S. Kingpin Statute (21 USC
848). However, none of these individuals would be considered
top-level leaders of Mexican drug cartels. End note).
Pending extradition reform legislation, when enacted, would
mitigate delays by allowing the surrender of such fugitives
to the U.S. before completion of their Mexican sentences.
-------
Comment
-------
¶18. (SBU) At the beginning of the Fox administration, the
U.S. sought more effective law enforcement cooperation with
the GOM, rapid moves to extradite a number of major criminals
and to deport American fugitives, less corrupt Mexican law
enforcement institutions, and better GOM control of Mexico's
southern border. After September 11, 2001, the focus on
intensifying USG-GOM security cooperation grew, especially
regarding CT, and Mexico largely responded to the challenge,
although specific improvements are still needed (ref A).
¶19. (SBU) Despite initial delays, the GOM also cooperated in
extraditing important criminals and deporting American
fugitives, although these extraditions have not yet yielded a
major cartel leader. Notwithstanding the Fox
administration's significant accomplishments in arresting
drug kingpins and other traffickers, Mexico faces a crisis in
narcotics-related violence along the border (as well as
domestic insecurity more generally) that requires urgent
attention (ref C).
¶20. (SBU) The GOM's record at rooting out endemic corruption
among its law enforcement entities has been targeted toward
units with which the USG cooperates, but has been
unremarkable otherwise. The GOM achieved significant
progress in establishing more effective, professional
MEXICO 00006085 005 OF 005
enforcement institutions through the creation and development
of AFI and PFP, respectively. Nevertheless, Mexican law
enforcement agencies, including AFI and PFP, too often fail
to coordinate horizontally across other Mexican law
enforcement entities, placing significant but artificial
limits on what has otherwise been remarkable progress. The
GOM has also done little to secure its southern border and
even less to reduce violence and illegal migration and
promote interdiction along the northern border (ref D).
While the Fox government has made important advances in
national security relative to its predecessors, Mexico still
has a long way to go.
Visit Mexico City's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/mexicocity
GARZA