

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06SANJOSE280, NEW LAW STRENGTHENS COSTA RICAN IMMIGRATION
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06SANJOSE280.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 SAN JOSE 000280
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR CA/OCS/ACS/WHA; WHA/CEN FOR JMACK; CA/OCS/CI
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CASC KFRD CS
SUBJECT: NEW LAW STRENGTHENS COSTA RICAN IMMIGRATION
AUTHORITY
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (SBU) On October 27, 2005 the Legislative Assembly
approved a draft law that criminalizes alien smuggling;
increases fines on airlines carrying passengers without
correct documentation; and fines individuals who aid, abet,
harbor, transport, and/or employ illegal migrants. After
nearly four years of political debate, the law is expected
to reduce illegal immigration. The new legislation will
come into effect on August 12, 2006. Human rights
organizations have spoken out vigorously about the law's
"draconian anti-human rights measures." It remains to be
seen whether the General Migration Directorate will receive
the resources needed to conduct the patrols and
investigations necessary to execute its new authority. END
SUMMARY.
-----------------------------
New Law In Effect Next August
-----------------------------
¶2. The last legislation on immigration was enacted in 1986
and it continues to serve as the country's migration law. It
does not criminalize human smuggling. The rise in smuggling
and illegal immigration was a major impetus in the decision
to draft new legislation four years ago. The President of
Costa Rica heartily supported the bill, emphasizing that it
would improve citizen security, reduce exploitation of
immigrants, and improve the GOCR's ability to collect social
security taxes. In a January 6, 2006 meeting, General
Migration Directorate Director Johnny Marin told ConOff that
the bill is a watershed in updating the law to reflect the
reality of Costa Rica's current migration trends. He
pointed out that the new law clearly articulates a
comprehensive migration policy that is focused on three
issues: public security, integration of foreigners who are
already living in Costa Rica, and preventing future waves of
immigrants. The full text of the law is available on-line
at: http://www.asamblea.go.cr/
¶3. Marin commented to ConOff that several issues in the new
law need to be developed further in future legislation. He
noted that the three pillars of the new migration policy are
going to be hard to implement. Marin shared that, due to
lack of political will, several important issues remain
untouched, such as the sections of the law which deal with
the amount of monthly income foreigners must show to obtain
status as residents in the country and the rules regarding
transmission of residency via marriage. He explained that
legislators are reluctant to attempt any changes to the bill
after the four long years of work it took to pass the
current version.
¶4. The new law states that foreigners who wish to obtain
legal permanent resident status as a "pensioner" must
demonstrate that they receive a minimum monthly pension of
USD 600 (Article 77). The law for retirees with no pension
seeking such status is contradictory. Article 77 states
they must show a "stable and permanent income from abroad"
in the amount of USD 1,000. However, Article 79 states that
retirees without a pension must demonstrate a "permanent and
stable income from abroad" in the amount of USD 2,000.
Marin himself pointed out this contradiction to ConOff, and
expressed his frustration that the paradox was not resolved
before the law was passed. He attributed the fact that the
amounts were not increased to efforts made by the
Libertarian legislators and an influential retirees
association.
--------------------------------------------- --------
New Smuggling Sanctions May Help U.S. Border Security
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶5. The new migration law explicitly criminalizes the
"illicit smuggling of people" for the first time in Costa
Rica. Marin commented to ConOff that this is one of the
strongest planks for getting tough on illegal migration.
The new law punishes "the transport of persons" with the
"intent to illicitly smuggle" them "into or out of the
country" by "evading established migratory controls or
utilizing false data or documents" with two to six years of
incarceration. The same punishment applies to persons who,
"with the intent to illicitly smuggle humans," "house, hide,
or conceal foreigners who enter or remain illegally in the
country." The punishment is increased by a third when the
individual involved is a government employee, or when minors
are involved in the smuggling process, whether as
accomplices or as victims (Article 245). The new law
stipulates that any foreigner who has entered the country
without following the proper procedures and is in the
country without the necessary legal documents may avoid
deportation if the person opts to press charges against
those individuals involved in their illegal entry and if
they cooperate with local authorities in the ensuing
investigation.
--------------------------------------------- -----------
Enhanced Sanctions For Complicity With Illegal Migration
--------------------------------------------- -----------
¶6. The new Migration Law has stiffer and more detailed
penalties for individuals who aid, abet, harbor, transport,
and/or employ illegal migrants. Director Marin pointed out
to ConOff that the 1986 legislation had only one section
that encompassed all regulations regarding "international
transport" issues. The new law has expanded this into four
sections, dealing with maritime, air, and land transport
separately, as well as a section that addresses "general
norms." Marin expressed confidence that the new law will
provide the Migration Department with expanded oversight and
investigative authority that should help cut down
significantly on the illegal flow of people and goods,
provided that staffing levels and resources are adequately
funded.
¶7. International transport companies will now be
responsible for presenting travel documents of each
passenger and crewmember, along with passenger lists
(Article 150). Sea vessels must present this information
eight days prior to arriving at a Costa Rican port (Article
157).
¶8. The new law prevents any boat from sailing or any plane
from taking off prior to receiving formal approval from the
Migration Directorate that all individuals on board comply
with migration requirements (Articles 158 and 161). Failure
to comply with this rule will result in administrative
proceedings being taken against the port's captain or the
air traffic controller for "grave error in exercising his
duties." The Migration Directorate will also be able to
board ships to conduct migratory checks of the passengers
either in port or while the boat is in national or
international waters. All inspection costs will be covered
by the maritime vessel involved (Articles 160 and 161).
¶9. The Migration Directorate will now be able to prevent
the entry or exit of any ground transport, national or
international, which is carrying individuals who do not
comply with migratory requirements. The Directorate will
also be able to detain vehicles for the time necessary to
ensure that all passengers comply with these requirements.
¶10. Any person representing an international transport
company whose vehicle, plane, or boat enters the country
with foreigners not in compliance with migration
requirements can be fined three to twelve times the base
monthly salary established by law. This fine can also be
applied to any foreigner who remains in Costa Rica after the
departure of the vessel by which he entered the country.
Repeat offenders in either of these areas may be subject to
administrative proceedings involving formal charges
(Articles 168 and 169). These are new sanctions that do not
appear in the existing migration legislation. Current law
states that international transport companies can be fined
$30-$45 for each person who enters the country via their
company and who is not in compliance with migration
requirement or who remains behind after the departure of the
vessel by which they entered the country (Articles 103 and
105 of 1986 legislation). The new law will also hold
transport companies financially responsible for all costs
involved with foreigners who remain in the country while
their status (whether they can stay or must leave the
country) is being determined (Article 153).
¶11. The new bill increases the sanctions against
individuals who harbor and/or employ illegal migrants
(Articles 173 and 178) from two to twelve times the minimum
monthly salary.
--------------------------------------------- ----------
New Law Criticized For Alleged Human Rights Infractions
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶12. Several entities involved with migration issues have
expressed concern about the law. Presidential candidate
Oscar Arias unsuccessfully asked the President to veto the
bill due to his concerns that it could lead to abuse of
illegal immigrants. The Human Rights Ombudsman's office,
the Catholic Church, and the U.N. High Commission for
Refugees (UNHCR) also expressed strong reservations about
the law. The Human Rights Ombudsman's Office (an
independent entity within the GOCR) was worried that there
is no system of checks and balances in place; the new law
gives General Migration Directorate final authority on
several matters. Article 220 of the new law states that
decisions made by the Migration Department to deny a visa,
refuse entry, or deport an individual cannot be appealed.
However, Migration Department Director Marin pointed out to
ConOff that the law does allow for appeals in some
circumstances; Article 219 cites five specific instances in
which appeals to the Migration Directorate's decision can be
made regarding the status of foreigners who are already
legally in the country.
¶13. The Catholic Church was concerned about measures that
would mete out jail sentences to individuals assisting
undocumented labor migrants. The Church succeeded in
getting the language changed such that individuals can
provide humanitarian assistance to undocumented migrants
without fear of going to jail. The UNHCR is worried that
the internationally accepted definition of refugee is not
used in the text, and key articles dealing with the
treatment and status of refugees (Articles 108 and 113) use
definitions created by the Legislative Assembly as opposed
to the internationally recognized terms. When asked about
the motive for this decision, Migration Department Director
Marin explained that one legislator decided it was pointless
to repeat definitions that had already been used in the
Geneva conventions to which Costa Rica is a party, so he
decided to craft his own. (Note: Marin expressed
frustration at the many thousands of Colombians in Costa
Rica with refugee status. It appeared that he supported the
narrower definitions included in the law; he said it is the
GOCR's right to establish whatever refugee definitions are
appropriate for Costa Rica. End Note.)
¶14. A spokesperson for the International Organization of
Migration (IOM) commented in a recent press interview that
the law does not adhere to standards set out in the U.N.
Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in
Persons. The Public Security Ministry responded that the
new legislation "complements international agreements
signed, ratified, and in force in Costa Rica." (Note: The
U.N. Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking
in Persons was ratified by Costa Rica on September 9, 2003
and entered into force on December 25, 2003. End Note.)
¶15. After four years of debate in the legislature, the
Constitutional Court also weighed in, providing suggestions
to modify an area of the law that, in the Court's view,
contained potential Constitutional shortcomings. On July
21, 2005, the Court issued an opinion stating that paragraph
one of Article 67, aimed at reducing marriage fraud as a
means of obtaining citizenship, was unconstitutional. The
law's draft language stated that the Costa Rican citizen in
the marriage would have to prove the union's legitimacy by
having lived overseas for a year with a foreign spouse. The
Court pointed out that the GOCR could not require a citizen
to live outside of his country on any grounds. The bill's
text was changed to eliminate this constitutional weakness.
Marin expressed his frustration to ConOff regarding the new
law's inability to outlaw marriages by proxy in which
foreigners are able to marry Costa Ricans and be in full
compliance with all the current requirements for residency
without having ever met their spouse. He explained that
Chinese and Cuban citizens widely abuse the current
loopholes in the system to gain Costa Rican citizenship.
--------------------------------------------- -
Funding Uncertain for New Law's Implementation
--------------------------------------------- -
¶16. Marin declined to comment directly on funding issues,
but candidly pointed out that his research indicates he
needs at least 300 more staff to carry out the new mandate
adequately. He stated that the Migration Directorate will
need "international dollars" to implement the new
legislation correctly. Marin added that due to payments on
the national debt, the Migration Directorate only receives
one-third of its allocated budget. He explained that
several key border posts lack the most basic tools, such as
vehicles, to investigate reported cases of illegal migration
and lawyers on staff who know the law and can build a case.
He mentioned that in San Jose alone, there are over 500
pending immigration investigations that are not attended to
due to lack of resources. Marin explained that some border-
crossings close at 4:30p.m., and that anyone who wants to
can easily cross over after the officials have gone home for
the evening.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶17. It appears that the challenge facing the migration law
is whether the GOCR has the political will and financial
resources to enforce it. It remains to be seen how the
implementing legislation, which is scheduled to be presented
to the newly elected President this summer, will be received
by the new administration. If the GOCR is successful in
eking out the required funds from its already cash-strapped
budget to fully enforce the new law, Nicaraguans who used to
come to Costa Rica looking for work may now start going
elsewhere, presumably north.
LANGDALE