

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09OTTAWA452, CANADA SEEKS MORE ANTI-TERRORIST TOOLS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09OTTAWA452.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09OTTAWA452 | 2009-06-10 20:08 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO5720
OO RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHMT RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0452/01 1612059
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 102059Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9539
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000452
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PTER PGOV PREL CA
SUBJECT: CANADA SEEKS MORE ANTI-TERRORIST TOOLS
REF: A. OTTAWA 338
- B. OTTAWA 198
- C. OTTAWA 079
- D. 08 OTTAWA 1578
- E. 08 TORONTO 286
- F. 08 TORONTO 114
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The federal government has begun a new
legislative push to restore two anti-terrorism tools --
investigative hearings and preventive arrest -- that lapsed in 2007.
Separately, the government has introduced a bill to allow victims
of state-sponsored terrorism to sue the perpetrators in Canadian
courts. The bill also mandates that the government create a list of
foreign states that sponsor or support terrorism. End summary.
LIBERALS ON SIDE, SECOND TIME AROUND
------------------------------------
¶2. (U) The federal government is again moving to restore two
anti-terrorism tools -- investigative hearings and recognizance with
conditions (preventive arrest) -- that lapsed in February 2007 under
sunset provisions in the 2001 Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA). The House
of Commons began debate on the bill (C-19) to amend the ATA on June
¶8. The bill is the government's third attempt to reinstate the
provisions, which security officials could use to disrupt imminent
terrorist attacks or gather information about an attack that had or
would have been committed. In debate on June 9, Liberal Public
Safety critic Mark Holland confirmed that Liberal MPs support the
government's bid to refer the bill to a lower house committee before
a late June recess, although they will work to amend it in committee
better to balance civil rights. Overall, however, Liberal MP Larry
Bagnell agreed his caucus is "very supportive of the concepts of the
bill."
A BITTER HISTORY
-----------------
¶3. (U) The ATA, which the then-Liberal government brought into law
in December 2001 in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, included
investigative hearings and recognizance with conditions. At the
time, human rights groups and some politicians claimed that the
legislation went too far in restraining civil liberties. As a
result, the government agreed to a five-year sunset clause on the
new powers. In a bitter debate in the House of Commons in February
2007, Liberal MPs combined with the other opposition parties to
defeat the minority Conservative government's motion to extend the
powers. Then-Liberal Party leader Stephane Dion argued that the
powers were no longer necessary and posed too great a risk to civil
liberties.
¶4. (U) The Conservatives pledged to restore the powers, calling them
"important tools" to enable law enforcement agencies to anticipate
and respond effectively to terrorist threats. In October 2007, the
government, unusually, introduced the bill in the Senate rather than
the lower house. The government said the tactic reflected its
desire to de-politicize the issue as well as to draw on the Senate's
expertise in conducting a mandatory review of the ATA. The bill
reinstated the two expired powers in a substantially similar form as
they had existed in the 2001 ATA, but added new safeguards for civil
rights. The Senate passed the legislation on March 6, 2008 and it
moved to the House of Commons, which was not able to act upon it
before the dissolution of Parliament for the October 2008 federal
election.
¶5. (U) The re-elected Conservative minority government reintroduced
the current bill in March 2009, this time in the House of Commons.
It is almost identical to the previous version, but with the extra
provision that Commons and Senate committees could conduct a
comprehensive review of the use or continuing need for the clauses
(although their recommendations would not be binding on the
government).
Qgovernment).
BALANCING SECURITY WITH CIVIL RIGHTS
------------------------------------
¶6. (U) Investigative hearings compel a person with information or
materials about a past or future terrorist offense to appear before
a judge and answer questions or provide material. The purpose is to
gather information, not to prosecute. The hearings are limited to
cases where reasonable grounds exist to believe that a terrorism
offense had been or would be committed. A police officer must
obtain the consent of the Attorney General to invoke the tool and
apply to a provincial court or higher court judge of a superior
court for an order for the hearing. The person compelled to appear
has the right to counsel at any stage of the proceedings. A witness
who evades the order, or is deemed by authorities about to abscond,
can be arrested without warrant and detained for up to thirty days
for the purpose of giving evidence at the hearing. The information
gained from the person cannot be used against him or her in any
criminal proceeding, except for perjury. An additional safeguard in
OTTAWA 00000452 002 OF 003
the bill requires police to satisfy the judge that "reasonable"
attempts have been made to obtain the information by other means.
¶7. (U) Recognizance with conditions (preventive arrest) gives the
police the authority to arrest a person without a warrant to disrupt
nascent terrorist activity and prevent aQ,%>|Qfer. A detained person must be
brought before a judge within 24 hours of his/her arrest or "as soon
as possible" up to a maximum of 72 hours of detention before a
hearing. If the judge is satisfied that reasonable grounds for
suspicion exist, the person could be required to enter into a
recognizance of conditions or conditional commitment (such as having
no contact with specified persons). The person could be imprisoned
for up to 12 months if he/she refuses to enter into the
recognizance.
¶8. (U) The bill includes another five-year sunset clause for both
provisions, as well as new annual reporting rules for the Attorney
General and the Minister of Public Safety to report to Parliament on
use of the powers, as well as their justification for extending the
provision.
¶9. (U) The two powers were never used when in force between 2001 and
¶2007. In 2004, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled investigative
hearings constitutional when it upheld an order for a hearing
arising from the Air India terrorist trial. However, the hearing
never took place, as the trial ended before the Court delivered its
ruling.
SECURING CONVICTIONS
--------------------
¶10. (U) The government has secured two convictions and one guilty
plea under the ATA (reftels):
-- an Ontario court convicted Momin Khawaja in October 2008 of
participating in terrorist training, financing, and facilitating
terrorism for his role in a conspiracy to bomb sites in London, U.K.
In March, the judge sentenced him to ten-and-a-half years
imprisonment, with no chance of parole for five years. Khawaja was
the first Canadian to be charged under the ATA;
-- a Toronto court convicted one youth (whose identify was publicly
protected under Canadian laws due to his age) in September 2008 of
participating in a terrorist activity and sentenced him in May 2009
to two-and-a-half years imprisonment. With credit for time served
since his arrest in June 2006, he was freed immediately, but on
probation. Another youth pled guilty in May 2009 to the same charge
and is awaiting sentencing. Both were members of the "Toronto 18,"
whom police arrested in June 2006 for allegedly conspiring to attack
Parliament and politicians as well as to bomb the Toronto offices of
CSIS, the RCMP, and CBC. Police have stayed charges against three
youths and four adults in the case, but nine other adults are
awaiting trial; and,
-- Moroccan-born Said Namouh came to Canada in 2003 and was arrested
in September 2007. He is currently in custody pending trial on
charges of creating and distributing jihad propaganda, and four
charges related to plotting terror attacks in Canada and Austria.
His bid to have the propaganda charges against him dropped on the
grounds that they infringed on his constitutional right to freedom
of speech failed on June 10, when a Montreal judge upheld the
constitutionality of the ATA.
LIFTING STATE IMMUNITY FOR SUPPORTERS OF TERRORISM
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶11. (U) In June, the government introduced a "Justice for Victims of
Terrorism" bill (C-35) to complement existing counter-terrorism
QTerrorism" bill (C-35) to complement existing counter-terrorism
measures and to allow victims of terrorism to sue perpetrators and
supporters of terrorism. The proposed bill would lift the immunity
of foreign states that the government designates as terrorism
supporters. The bill also establishes a listing mechanism for state
sponsors of terror. If the bill becomes law, the Minister of
Foreign Affairs, in consultation with the Minister of Public Safety,
would advise the government on the establishment of the list.
¶12. (U) The legislation would allow victims of terrorism who can
demonstrate a "real and substantial" connection between their case
and Canada to sue in a Canadian court those foreign states included
on the government's list. Plaintiffs would be able to seek redress
for terrorist acts committed anywhere in the world on, or after, 1
January 1985. Successful convictions could result in seizure of
assets and property. For claims related to terrorist acts committed
outside Canada, plaintiffs would have to give the foreign state in
which the incident occurred "reasonable opportunity" to submit the
OTTAWA 00000452 003 OF 003
dispute to arbitration in accordance with accepted international
rules of arbitration before applying to a Canadian court. In
tabling the legislation, Minister of Public Safety Peter Van Loan
insisted that Canada is sending a "clear message" that perpetrators
of terrorism and their supporters will be held accountable.
COMMENT
¶13. (SBU) Thus far, the debate on the ATA amendments has been
uncontroversial and, crucially, the Liberals appear supportive.
Debate on C-35 has not yet begun. Under new leader Michael
Ignatieff, the Liberals have been careful quietly to support the
robust Conservative anti-crime agenda in order to deprive the
Conservatives of a wedge issue in the next election. Similarly,
they are unlikely in principle to oppose, or substantially modify,
the anti-terrorism bills. The biggest worry now is whether the
bills -- notably the ATA amendments -- can make it through both
houses of Parliament before Canada faces another election, in which
case the draft legislation would again die and the next government
would face the choice of yet another re-introduction.
BREESE