

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07MOSCOW1442, RUSSIAN CORPORATE STATISM: WATCH THIS SPACE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07MOSCOW1442.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07MOSCOW1442 | 2007-04-02 07:07 | 2010-12-01 21:09 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Moscow |
VZCZCXRO1331
PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHMO #1442/01 0920750
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 020750Z APR 07
FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8840
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 MOSCOW 001442
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EUR/RUS; EUR/ERA; EEB/IFD
STATE PLS PASS USTR FOR DONNELLY, MOLNAR
NSC FOR KLECHESKI AND MCKIBBEN
DOC FOR 4231/IEP/EUR/JBROUGHER
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/02/2017
TAGS: ECON EINV EIND PGOV RS
SUBJECT: RUSSIAN CORPORATE STATISM: WATCH THIS SPACE
REF: 06 MOSCOW 1306
Classified By: Ambassador William J. Burns for reasons 1.5 (b/d)
¶1. (C) Summary: The rise of corporate statism in Russia has
been significant. Since 2004, the government has taken over
the world's largest titanium business, consolidated its
position in Gazprom, merged 10 aviation businesses into a
state-owned conglomerate, and taken controlling positions in
other firms. No less fascinating has been the mix of greed,
politics, and business behind the expansion of the state into
the economy. Looking ahead, our contacts are strongly
divided. Some see troubling signs of continued state
ambition. Others believe the process is essentially
plateauing, and will stabilize at lower levels of state
ownership in the economy after two-three years. In our view,
the current trendline may quickly approach some rather
natural limits, and the Kremlin will eventually have to bow
to the market. In the meantime, we should reinforce
market-driven approaches and the cadre of Russian
policy-makers who doggedly keep these ideas in play. End
Summary.
¶2. (SBU) This cable is based on dozens of conversations with
contacts in industry and banking over the past six weeks,
supplemented by Embassy-based research.
The Breadth of State Ownership
------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) The march of the state into parts of the Russian
economy over the past few years has been significant, with
control of swaths of the natural resource, defense, and
select other sectors consolidated in state hands. Annual
revenues of Russia's ten largest state-owned or controlled
companies reached an estimated 20 percent of GDP in 2006.
State-owned or controlled companies account for one-third of
the Russian stock market's capitalization, and in just the
last year, the value of these equity holdings has almost
doubled to an estimated USD 369 billion. And the process
continues: Rosoboronexport is rumored to be in line to buy
Russia's fifth largest steel producer, Mechel; further
consolidation in the energy sector favoring Gazprom and
Rosneft is likely; a new shipbuilding national champion is in
the works; and diamond giant Alrosa has its eye on Norilsk
Nickel, a USD 30 billion company with more than the half the
world's palladium and one-fifth of global nickel output.
Looking Behind This Latest Great Grab
-------------------------------------
¶4. (C) The grab for Russia's resources is an old story, but
contacts agree that traditional motives (greed, power) have
been supplemented in this round with a nationalistic brand of
commercial considerations. Greed in Russia shocks no one,
but the rising value of Russia, Inc. (on the back of high
energy prices) has made the current grab particularly
profitable for some. Power considerations -- both
geopolitical (as in the case of Gazprom) and in the context
of Russia's domestic succession process -- are evident as
well. New to this paradigm is the surprisingly strong role
business considerations seem to be playing -- as the Russian
Government tries to salvage a select few decrepit remains of
Soviet industrial prowess before it is too late. Our
contacts have a lot to say about all three motives; we
summarize what we've heard here.
¶5. (C) Greed: The Kremlin leadership in the economy is in no
small part about money, and the Sibneft takeover by Gazprom
is perhaps the most blatant example of this (only about a
quarter of the $12b selling price for the firm is said to
have actually gone to owner Abramovich). In general, the
insider offtake from M&A deal flows is said to be so large
now that Swiss banks have told Kremlin cutouts (like
gas-trader Timchenko) that they cannot accept further
deposits without knowing the source of the money. The most
lucrative transfers to the state (usually involving natural
resources) may be wrapped in patriotic rhetoric, but include
a healthy dose of financial opportunism. Yet, as ugly as it
looks, our contacts remind, it is not so different than what
happened in Indonesia and South Korea - and Mexico too. As
one contact points out, "the bureaucrats got rich there too."
MOSCOW 00001442 002 OF 004
¶6. (C) Power: Creating national champions and projecting a
strong image for Russia abroad has been a leading factor in
many state-connected takeovers and consolidations, including
the removal of the Gazprom ring fence, the Rosoboronexport
makeover, the RUSAL-SUAL deal, and the anticipated takeover
of Norilsk Nickel by Alrosa. Some of what we are seeing is
also is part of the ongoing succession process, putting
individuals into deal flows and thus providing campaign
finance and enhancing their public profile. The decision to
put military hardware exports under Rosoboronexport is seen
in some quarters as buttressing dark horse presidential
hopeful and Rosoboronexport Chairman Sergey Chemezov. Recent
portfolio changes are seen by some as giving First Deputy
Prime Minister Sergey Ivanov a cash-laden institutional base
like that enjoyed by his chief rival for the presidency,
First Deputy Head of the Presidential Administration and
Gazprom Chairman of the Board of Directors Dmitriy Medvedev.
¶7. (C) Nationalistic-Driven Commercial Considerations: Many
believe that Putin and those around him are also driven by a
sincere desire to right the excesses of the 1990s, or
oligarchic plundering of once-proud, though ruinously
inefficient, Soviet companies. The examples here are truly
varied. In the case of Avtovaz, Rosoboronexport's move to
take over the firm last year may be the only thing saving the
car-giant from complete collapse in the face of global
competition. The emerging Norilsk Nickel story is said to be
as much about saving Alrosa (which experts say will run out
of diamonds in ten years' time) as it is about keeping
Norilsk's palladium and nickel output in Russian hands. And,
as driven by national security concerns as the formation of
the United Aircraft Company might be, also at play is a
long-overdue consolidation of an industry largely on the
verge of collapse. These examples are more about saving jobs
and communities and creating viable competitive companies
than personal enrichment. Although making money is not
precluded here, both Avtovaz and UAC, not to mention plans to
create a new shipbuilding national champion, sound more like
cash sinks than cash cows.
What Next?
----------
¶8. (C) Looking ahead, our contacts are divided about what to
expect next. "Statist" believers argue that there are
troubling signs that the trend is far from contained:
state-owned companies are straying farther from their core
business, eyeing the telecom and IT sectors, and expanding
beyond traditional financial services. They point to
Gazprom's movement into electricity; Svyazinvest's
significant stake in privately-held telecom provider Comstar;
and VneshTorgBank's overtures to brokerage house Troika
Dialog (ultimately rebuffed). While no one is predicting
another Yukos-style approach, there is a sense that the
authorities can and will come up with new pretexts for
control.
¶9. (C) In contrast, others argue the state's reach is
plateauing, and the current mix of state-private ownership
could start to reverse itself before long. They say national
champions in the sectors that make sense have been created,
and industries such as telecom and IT do not lend themselves
to over-centralization. In gas and electricity, given supply
shortfalls, the GOR has to promote private investment to meet
demand and introduce efficiencies. A shrinking current
account balance (on the back of lower oil prices) and the
drive to diversify the economy only heighten the need for
private capital and better corporate governance (which
implies a move away from state ownership and control). The
Kremlin will also find it increasingly difficult to control
emerging interest groups, from the consumer sector to
regional governments. Integration into the WTO and other
western economic institutions will require greater
transparency, better and more equal market access, and lower
protectionist barriers - which will temper the state's
ambition.
¶10. (C) Some take this latter argument one dark step further.
They say that current GOR leadership, its successors and
supporters, will need to find outlets for their accumulated
wealth, much of which is said to be held in liquid assets
abroad. The theory goes that these funds will start making
their way back to Russia over the next two-three years, and
that the target of the return flows will most likely be the
MOSCOW 00001442 003 OF 004
same assets that have been carefully squirreled away in state
hands over the past few years -- thus spurring share
offerings by Rosneft, spin offs at Gazprom, etc. These
assets are profitable, and equity ownership in Russia carries
less risk for this particular group of investors than the
prying eyes of regulatory authorities abroad. Likewise,
coming into Russia from an European investment platform, as
one contact cynically noted, may make it less likely that
zealous law-enforcement officials abroad would pursue
criminal or civil cases for fear a U.S. or European firm
could get tangled up in the investigation.
Where We Come Out
-----------------
¶11. (C) Looking at the three motives most obviously at play,
two of them -- greed and nationalistic commercial
considerations -- suggest equally valid reasons why we might
see the state pulling back from its commanding heights over
the next few years. Greed will tend to push those who have
accumulated shares in state companies towards share
cash-outs, just as it will push those who have accumulated
"private" cash abroad to buy back into Russia's safest
investments. Rosneft is a perfect example. We are watching
to see who in the government argues the loudest for Rosneft's
further privatization -- they more than likely stand to
benefit from either the sell or the buy opportunity. For
industries that are less obvious moneymakers, exemplified by
Avtovaz and UAC, the state is even more likely to divest
(wholly, in the case of Avtovaz) as the firms become
commercially viable and need investment capital and strategic
partners, and as they become less social land mines and
resemble more the typical day-to-day slog of the business
world.
¶12. (C) But pulling back does not mean exiting the field.
XXXXXXXXXXXX does not expect the state ever to
relinquish its control of XXXXXXXXXXXX. Nor will the
GOR allow its stake in Gazprom to drop again below 50%,
although many predict it will shed non-core assets in the
coming years. Nor will the diamond trade or trade in metals
likely see a repeat of the halcyon days of private ownership
in the wake of loans-for-shares. UAC will likely never be
more than 30% privately-owned.
¶13. (C) But even if every firm in the natural resources
sector ends up in state hands, as significant as that would
be, it would account for around 12% of the Russian economy.
Add in state monopolies in the transport and communications
sector, defense industries, and space, and state control over
the economy rings in around 25% of GDP. As disturbing as
this figure might seem, it is not wildly out of line with
other market economies rich in natural resources. As
recently as two years ago, the Norwegian state owned
approximately 32% of the companies listed on the Oslo Stock
Exchange, and still holds shares in 10-15 percent of
Norwegian industry, including controlling shares in oil,
telecoms, and the national airline. In Mexico, the state
fully controls the oil, gas, and nuclear power industries and
has reserved for the state in whole or part the
telecommunications, air travel, and postal sectors.
¶14. (C) And these back of the envelope estimates ignore
important counter trends to the movement toward greater state
control. Whole swaths of the economy, our interlocutors
again and again confirm, lie fully outside the ambitions of
the state -- and are thriving. One seasoned businessman (who
has had his hat handed to him on more than one occasion over
the past 15 years) is back in Russia and growing fast, and he
chalks up his current success to the booming service and
retail sector, a place where he says he never comes in
contact with the designs of the Kremlin. There are also
instances, like with XXXXXXXXXXXX, where, despite the
new ownership
structure, the state has left the firm to run the business
without Rosoboronexport grabbing off profits or instructing
where production should go. Lastly, it would be
irresponsible to ignore the progress being made toward the
break-up and privatization of both the electricity and rail
sectors. When all is said and done, these massive reforms
will move some 2-3 percent of GDP from state to private hands.
¶15. (C) There is another reason why more of this economy
will likely move into the private sector. Economic
modernizers, as they have come to call themselves here, may still
MOSCOW 00001442 004 OF 004
ultimately get the upper hand. XXXXXXXXXXXX,
XXXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXXXX and others
recognize that only through greater private sector
participation in the economy will Russia be able to attract
the capital needed to sustain growth over the long run. This
is also where working to bring Russia into international
institutions will help drive policy here in the direction we
favor. Locking the Russian Government into such institutions
and exposing Russian companies to the discipline of the
global market will reinforce the trends we seek to encourage.
Doing so this year, before the election process starts to
create new winners and losers, is a bet on the modernizers
worth taking.