

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09BERLIN1158, MEDIA REACTION: U.S., AFGHANISTAN, LEBANON
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BERLIN1158.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09BERLIN1158 | 2009-09-18 12:12 | 2011-01-13 05:05 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Berlin |
VZCZCXRO9064
RR RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHLZ
DE RUEHRL #1158/01 2611235
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 181235Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5236
INFO RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUCNFRG/FRG COLLECTIVE
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 1546
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 0238
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0761
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 2286
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 1293
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 0479
RHMFIUU/HQ USAFE RAMSTEIN AB GE
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE//J5 DIRECTORATE (MC)//
RHMFISS/CDRUSAREUR HEIDELBERG GE
RUKAAKC/UDITDUSAREUR HEIDELBERG GE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 BERLIN 001158
STATE FOR INR/R/MR, EUR/PAPD, EUR/PPA, EUR/CE, INR/EUC, INR/P,
SECDEF FOR USDP/ISA/DSAA, DIA FOR DC-4A
VIENNA FOR CSBM, CSCE, PAA
"PERISHABLE INFORMATION -- DO NOT SERVICE"
SIPDIS
E.0. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO GM US RS IR PK IN IC
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S., AFGHANISTAN, LEBANON
¶1. Lead Stories Summary
¶2. (U.S.) Missile Defense
¶3. (Afghanistan) Aftermath of Elections
¶4. (Lebanon) Formation of New Government
¶1. Lead Stories Summary
Print media focused primarily on two issues: President Obama's
decision to give up the missile defense program involving Poland and
the Czech Republic, and the school attack in the Franconian city of
Ansbach. Some papers also foregrounded the election campaign, which
is moving into its final days. Editorials focused on President
Obama's decision to give up the missile defense plan and the school
attack. ZDF-TV's early evening newscast heute opened with a live
report from Ansbach, while ARD-TV's early evening newscast
Tagesschau opened with reports on the missile defense.
¶2. (U.S.) Missile Defense
All media prominently reported that "President Obama has put a stop
to the plans of his predecessor, Bush, to deploy a missile defense
shield in Eastern Europe. He explained this by saying that there
are new facts on the threat Iran poses" (ARD-TV's primetime newscast
Tagesschau). Many media described Obama's "U-turn" as an attempt to
get Russian support for UN measures against Iran. Although most
editorials welcomed the decision, it also met with some skepticism.
Front-page headlines included: "Obama puts a stop to the missile
defense shield in Poland and the Czech Republic" (Berliner Zeitung
9/18)), "U.S. puts stop to missile defense shield in Eastern Europe"
(S|ddeutsche), "Obama gives up Bush's missile defense shield in
Europe" (Die Welt), "Obama chooses a 'flexible' missile defense"
(Frankfurter Allgemeine), and "Obama declares peace to Russia" (FT
Deutschland).
Primetime ARD-TV's Tagesschau (9/17) commented: "Although there
might be new threat assessments and technological progress,
President Obama wants to remove a large diplomatic stumbling
block.... Obama hopes that Moscow will make concessions in
connection with Iran and nuclear disarmament."
Westdeutscher Rundfunk (9/17) radio commented: The renouncement of
the missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic does not
just come as a relief for Central Europe and Russia, but lets the
entire world believe in disarmament again.... Once again,
Washington's change towards reason demonstrates once more that
Bush's policy was dangerous for the world. The view forward makes
us hopeful. Only together with Moscow, we can persuade Tehran to
make reliable concessions to prevent the production of nuclear
weapons once and for all without ruling out the peaceful usage of
nuclear energy.... Obama's decision strengthens those within and
outside NATO who believe in disarmament. What remains is the
disappointment of Polish and Czech politicians who had hoped to
increase their countries' security through the missile defense
shield. These backward thinking people should now consider the
possibility that they will particularly benefit from Washington's
improved relations with Moscow."
Deutschlandfunk radio (9/17) commented: "Obama believes that solo
runs within NATO are counterproductive. For the current U.S.
government, Russia is an indispensible partner in the UN Security
Council. However, this is not given as a reason because Obama wants
to prevent the impression that he bowed to vehement Russian
resistance to the original missile defense plans.... If this
decision is interpreted as a weakness, then this is another price
BERLIN 00001158 002 OF 004
Washington has to pay for its misguided policies in recent years."
ARD-TV late night newscast Tagesthemen (9/17) remarked: "This is
realpolitik. Reagan and Bush's Star Wars dreams were ideologically
motivated and therefore did not consider costs and dangers. Obama
is practical, even when he looks at his budget. In addition, no
U.S. President makes such concessions without getting something in
return. We might already see next week when the UN Security
Council responds to Iran's nuclear policy what kind of concessions
Russia makes. Obama will head the meeting and needs a success.
And, as a great hope from whom many still expect the impossible, he
needs success."
S|ddeutsche Zeitung (9/18) opined: "Obama's greatest challenge will
be that he must remove the suspicion that he bowed to Russia. He
must not just do this in Congress but also in Eastern Europe, where
people fear that Moscow could see the renouncement of the missile
defense shield as a sign of weakness that encourages the Russians to
pursue their interests elsewhere with tanks, like in Georgia.
However, Obama will have many opportunities to show that the missile
defense shield is not the yardstick for NATO's loyalty to the Poles
and Czechs.... NATO could do maneuvers in the countries and if
necessary set up bases there. NATO's new strategy should also take
the fears of eastern Europeans into account.... Obama will have
difficulty implementing his cooperative foreign policy if Europe as
a whole does not support him."
Die Welt (9/18) commented on its front-page: "One thing was certain
in the past: America's Presidents come and go - but their foreign
policies remain the same.... Obama is entering a new path and the
direction is getting clearer... As expected, the U.S. government is
saying goodbye to George W. Bush's plan to establish a missile
defense shield in Central Europe. The reason is practical and
fundamental... It is a further signal that Obama is pursuing a
policy on Iran that is based on building confidence. And it fits
in his ambitious project to create a world without nuclear weapons.
It must be seriously asked whether this policy isn't naove and
dangerous, also because disappointment is spreading in Central
Europe."
Under the headline "U-turn," Frankfurter Allgemeine (9/18) said in a
front-page commentary: "There is no doubt that the decision has an
enormous impact on foreign and security policy, not to speak of the
style of communicating it [to Poland and the Czech Republic]. It
will have an effect on the potential countries where it was supposed
to be deployed. They had to take a lot of unpleasant criticism from
their western neighbors, threats from Russia and skepticism among
their own people when the topic of missile defense was hot under
Bush. In the future when the next controversial topic is debated,
they will think twice whether they should move so closely to the
U.S. and take such risks."
Frankfurter Rundschau (9/18) remarked: "Russia is a partner that
the U.S. cannot ignore. Until the end of the year, both countries
have to agree on renewing the START treaty if they want to avoid a
new arms race. Russian President Medvedev has made clear what the
price is: the U.S. must renounce the missile defense shield, return
to the ABM treaty that builds mutual confidence and renounces
missile defense systems. Iran seems to be playing only on the
regional level. The renouncing of missile defense is not just a
tactical move. It is a change of course. The leaders in Moscow
should not be under the illusion that their toughness has paid off.
However, Europeans can hope that Washington's current understanding
for bearing global responsibility will continue."
¶3. (Afghanistan) Aftermath of Elections
Many papers carried factual news reports on the events in
Afghanistan, but the majority of them focused on the aftermath of
BERLIN 00001158 003 OF 004
the airstrike near Kunduz and the elections and, in reports on the
Karzai government's reaction to allegations of election fraud,
mentioned that six Italian soldiers died in a suicide attack in
Kabul. Frankfurter Allgemeine (9/18) headlined on its front page:
"Many People killed in Attack on ISAF Soldiers in Kabul." In
another report FAZ (9/18) wrote that "the death of six Italian
soldiers of a unit based in Siena in a suicide attack in Kabul has
caused a shock in Italy but has, for the time being, not resulted in
a new debate over the [Italian] mission in Afghanistan."
Tagesspiegel (9/18) headlined: "16 people Killed in Attack in Kabul
- Six Italian Soldiers Die," and wrote: "This was the thus far most
serious attack on the Italian forces in Afghanistan. Italy has sent
2,800 soldiers to the ISAF forces in the country. As of Thursday,
20 Italian soldiers have lost their lives in the mission."
Sueddeutsche Zeitung (9/18) reported under the headline: "Serious
Attack In Kabul - Six Italian Soldiers Dead - Karzai Defends
Elections" that "In Italy, the death of the soldiers caused a shock
and a new political debate over the Italian military engagement in
Afghanistan."
Editorial commentary, however, focused on the outcome of the
presidential elections. Die Welt (9/18) demands: "Recount! Now,"
and judged: "In Berlin, the question of whether the re-election of
Afghan President Karzai is credible or fraudulent has major domestic
political significance. The question is not whether Afghanistan is
ripe for democracy or whether a certain degree of corruption...is
acceptable. The question is whether a fraudulent majority for
Karzai offers the Taliban a lever to present themselves on the
international stage as the political opposition against a corrupt
regime and then get rid of the description 'terrorists.' If the
Taliban are trying to be recognized as a party in the civil war and
are able to refer to a fraudulent election, the government in Berlin
could no longer use the argument that the Bundeswehr presence in
Afghanistan as a 'stabilization mission,' not a 'war.' Hamid Karzai
rejected the allegation that one quarter of the votes was falsified.
The West must now examine this in the same resolute way as it did
in Pakistan in 2008 after former ruler Musharraf suspended the
parliamentary elections. If the West uses different yardsticks for
Karzai than it used for Musharraf, the Taliban supporters will
expand their assistance. And then it is only a small step to the
foundation of a 'National Liberation Front' with which the Taliban
could legitimize themselves internationally. That is why all votes
should be recounted and, if necessary, new elections be held."
According to Frankfurter Allgemeine (9/18), "people easily talked
about a 'success' after the Afghan presidential elections...but the
degree of egregious vote-rigging, which is now gradually coming to
the fore, is surprising. What is even worse President Karzai is
left looking like the main sinner. The international community that
is supporting his government with financial means and supports him
with 100,000 soldiers who are risking their lives for the country's
survival on a daily basis is faced with a dilemma. It cannot
continue to support him but cannot drop him either. The best way
out is to give the election results the greatest possible legitimacy
by reviewing them, if necessary also with a runoff election, even if
it takes place early next year."
¶4. (Lebanon) Formation of New Government
In an editorial Sueddeutsche (9/18) said: "The surprising thing
about Lebanon is that life continues there even without a
government. For more than three months now, the parties are unable
to agree on a coalition. One reason is that the possible coalition
parties recklessly pursue their own political and economic
interests. Second, the neighboring states and the major powers are
also involved in Lebanon. The opposition parties led by Hezbollah
tend to look to Iran, which wants to enter into talks with the
United States at the beginning of October. The Saudis and with them
the Americans are strengthening prime minister-designate Hariri and
BERLIN 00001158 004 OF 004
his team because Tehran's influence is to be contained in Lebanon,
too. But these are not favorable prospects for an early agreement."
MURPHY