

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09STATE120099, BLUE LANTERN OUTREACH TO CANADA: DISCUSSIONS WITH
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09STATE120099.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09STATE120099 | 2009-11-20 18:06 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Secretary of State |
VZCZCXRO5397
RR RUEHMT
DE RUEHC #0099/01 3270604
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 201855Z NOV 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0426-0429
RUEHMT/AMCONSUL MONTREAL 0043-0046
RUEHON/AMCONSUL TORONTO 0020-0023
INFO RHMCSUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC 7001-7004
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHINGTON DC 6078-6081
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEPINS/HQ BICE INTEL WASHINGTON DC 0767-0770
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 STATE 120099
SENSITIVE
C O R R E C T E D C O P Y (SENSITIVE CAPTION ADDED)
SIPDIS
STATE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETTC KOMC CA
SUBJECT: BLUE LANTERN OUTREACH TO CANADA: DISCUSSIONS WITH
EMBASSY AND CONSULATES, GOC OFFICIALS, AND INDUSTRY
REF: 2006 BLUE LANTERN GUIDEBOOK
STATE 00120099 001.2 OF 004
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Representatives from the Bureau
of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Compliance (PM/DTCC) met October 13-16 with
Mission Canada staff in Montreal, Ottawa, and Toronto, GOC
officials, and local defense industry to discuss
the Blue Lantern end-use monitoring program and
related defense trade compliance issues. PM/DTCC reps
briefed
embassy and consular staff on implementing the
Blue Lantern program at post and shared results of
a research project involving U.S. companies'
use of the Canadian exemption to export defense articles
to Canada. Preliminaryresults of the research indicate as
many as 154 third party transfer violations involving U.S.
defense articles exported under the Canadian exemption; DTCC
team agreed to further consultations with ICE
attach office as additional results are obtained.
Team also conducted a Blue Lantern site visit
in Montreal to Unisource Technology, Inc., a private
company which provides ITAR-controlled defense articles
to National Defense Canada. Washington believes the
outreach visit achieved goals of improving GOC and industry
understanding of U.S. export control laws and regulations,
strengthening country team's knowledge of Blue Lantern
program, and enhancing DTCC's understanding of Canadian
defense industry and GOC export/import and technology
security procedures.
--------------------------------------------- ---
PURPOSE OF TRIP AND MEMBERS OF BLUE LANTERN TEAM
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶2. (U) Administered by the Office of Defense
Trade Controls Compliance (PM/DTCC) and pursuant
to the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), Blue
Lantern is a global program designed to verify
the end-use, end-users, and final disposition
of U.S. defense articles,
technology and services subject to the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).
This visit was part of ongoing PM/DTCC's efforts
to improve the effectiveness of Blue Lantern
through outreach visits with embassies, foreign
industry, and host governments. The DTCC Blue
Lantern team consisted of Research and Analysis
Division (RAD) Chief Ed Peartree and PM/DTCC/RAD
Compliance Specialists Kyle Ballard and Tim Mazzarelli.
--------------------------------------------- --------
MONTREAL CONSULATE TEAM BRIEF AND INDUSTRY SITE VISIT
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶3. (U) The Blue Lantern team briefed Political
Officer Peter Martin, Assistant ICE attach David Denton,
and Foreign Commercial Specialist Gina Bento on the
Department's program for end-use monitoring of defense
articles and services, guidelines for implementing the
program at post, and the importance of preventing the
unauthorized re-export and retransfer of U.S. defense
articles. Team also briefed participants on its research
project involving U.S. companies' use of the
Canadian exemption and Department's concern that the
exemption may be abused by certain parties to facilitate
illegal exports.
¶4. (U) Embassy Ottawa Economic Officer Lori
Balbi and Peter Martin accompanied Blue Lantern
team on a site visit to Unisource Technology, Inc.
(Unisource). Team met with Unisource President
& CEO Rudy Rutenberg, Executive Director Bruce
Rutenberg, and Contracts Administration Director
Cathy Jones. Unisource staff provided background
information on export requests and business operations,
as well as Unisource's physical security measures
STATE 00120099 002.2 OF 004
for handling sensitive U.S. defense articles.
Based on verification of order and documentation
establishing Canadian Armed Forces as final end user
and evidence of a long standing business relationship
with National Defense Canada, team was confident that
Unisource is a reliable recipient of USML items.
--------------------------------------------- --------------
OTTAWA CONSULATE TEAM AND GOC OFFICIALS BRIEF
--------------------------------------------- --------------
¶5. (U) Blue Lantern team PM/DTCC reps briefed Senior Case
Officer,
Controlled Goods Directorate (CGD), Public Works and
Government Services Canada, Serge Poirier and colleague
Mary Hyde on the Blue Lantern end-use monitoring
program. Team emphasized that Blue Lantern is not an
investigation
or law enforcement activity but rather a cooperative
program designed to improve security and integrity of
defense trade relationship between U.S. and international
partners.
6 (U) Poirier in turn provided a detailed
accounting of the CGD's compliance program including
Canada's SOP for registration of companies dealing in
strategic goods. According to Poirier, companies go
through a general vetting process which assesses a
firm's history and ownership. Registration lapses
after a five year period at which time the company
must re-justify/re-apply. During the five year
registration period companies must maintain all business
records and visitation logs, must internally vet all
employees, and are subject to inspection by the CGD.
Poirier noted that all registered companies will be
inspected at least once during the five year
registration period. Should inspections reveal
noncompliance, company registration can be suspended
or revoked. Problems that reveal possible criminal
violations are referred to the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police (RCMP).
¶7. (SBU) Blue Lantern team met with ICE attach
Craig Healy, Deputy ICE attach Bobby Fuentes, Assistant
ICE attach Spencer Schneider, ATF attach Bob Thomas,
and FBI Legal Attach Bob Doherty to discuss Blue Lantern
end-use monitoring and related defense trade issues.
ICE attach office was
familiar with the Blue Lantern program and is highly
focused on export-related cases. Healey noted that there
is strong cooperation at the working level with Canadian
Border Security Agency (CBSA) and the RCMP; less so at senior
levels where legal complications and obstacles to joint
cooperation arise.
¶8. (SBU) Canadian export controls enforcement
has traditionally been viewed mainly as a regulatory issue,
rather than as a criminal enforcement matter; this
according to Healy, is gradually changing. CBSA is Canada's
Customs
agency but has limited enforcement capability; RCMP is
the body that investigates potential criminal cases.
During the meeting it was noted that an obstacle in
the U.S.-CA law enforcement relationship is that
RCMP has a tendency to over-classify information, creating
barriers to information exchange. Furthermore, Canadian
laws on privacy inhibit the free exchange of information
regarding Canadian citizens, even among GOC agencies.
Healy noted, however, that with regard to Blue Lantern
requests information seems to flow more freely. ICE
will approach CBSA or RCMP to find out what they might
know about a Canadian company (subject of a Blue Lantern
check) and/or to share Department's concerns.
¶9. (SBU) PM/DTCC team met with CBSA Counterproliferation
Section Manager George Webb, RCMP Staff Sergeant,
Tim Ranger, and ICE attachs. Webb and Ranger described
their
respective agencies' missions and discussed shared agency
goals. Webb indicated that destination of an export is the
primary factor scrutinized by CBSA, and that they also
consider
the track record and reputation of exporters. The agency
does not have discretionary authority to ban a problematic
exporter (Comment: DTCC can place a company/entity under
STATE 00120099 003.2 OF 004
a "policy of denial" based on documented concerns, without
criminal indictment or conviction) without a
criminal conviction but can detain goods as long as the
agency deems
appropriate. The GOC is currently reviewing
counterproliferation
legislation that would further criminalize proliferation
activity,
and presumably expand their powers with regard to export
investigations. Webb also noted that CBSA has an "alert"
system similar to DTCC's Watch List that flags potentially
problematic entities.
¶10. (SBU) DTCC discussed its research findings
from export filings citing the Canadian exemption
and noted that there were 154 instances of possible
exports (or re-exports) to third countries (Comment:
exports under the Canadian exemption are for end-use
in Canada only). Webb indicated that CBSA could
put an alert on the companies involved into their system.
Webb and Ranger noted that traditionally, both CBSA
and RCMP have been focused on in-bound shipments and
are only now becoming more focused on exports.
ICE attach Craig Healy suggested that a further avenue of
U.S.-Canada cooperation might include the creation of
an international task force that would bring
Canadian-U.S. DOJ prosecutors together to create pressure
at higher levels in support of export enforcement.
DTCC indicated that it would pass this information to
the U.S. DOJ, National Coordinator for Export Enforcement
Cases, Steve Pelak.
¶11. (U) Blue Lantern team also met with Canadian
Department of Foreign Affairs and International
Trade (DFAIT) Senior Export Control Officer
Lynne Sabatino to discuss the respective
features of Canadian and U.S. export controls.
Sabatino exhibited extensive knowledge of ITAR
regulations and provided a detailed
description of the Canadian export control review process.
Sabatino explained that DFAIT export controls cover
both munitions and dual-use commodities, and consider
Canadian foreign policy in addition to national security
and international regimes
when making export decisions. Sabatino noted
that all license permit applications are reviewed
by technical experts who pre-screen authorization
requests for licensing permit officers. She
also explained procedural features that are
incorporated into the permit process which act to
safeguard transactions involving USML items. For
example, applications for permits have fields
for "country of manufacture" and "U.S. content".
If the end-items for export are listed as including
any U.S. content, the system will automatically prompt
the license permit officer to demonstrate compliance
with U.S. law. In items that include USML, the
applicant is required to obtain U.S. re-export
authorization. The system, however, relies on the
applicant for full disclosure. The improper re-export
of USML (by either failing to note content or false
declaration) thus is not only a violation of U.S.
law but of Canadian law as well.
¶12. (U) Canada conducts "post audit"
checks via their overseas Embassies. Pre-
permit checks are conducted from Ottawa and
consist mostly of background research and analysis.
Audits are initiated based on a variety of factors
including commodity sensitivity and destination
and are conducted at the discretion of the
permit officer. Sabatino stressed that DFAIT is
committed to maintaining the Canadian exemption
and that Canada applies appropriate security
and control measures to ensure the safe handling of USML.
--------------------------------------------- ----
TORONTO CONSULATE TEAM BRIEF
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶13. (SBU) In Toronto, Blue Lantern team met with Economic
and Political Section Chief, Lee MacTaggart and ICE
attach John Ward. MacTaggart and Ward emphasized
that Toronto - given its status as a business center
and ethnically diverse community - is where the
majority of export enforcement cases arise within the
STATE 00120099 004.2 OF 004
province.
They indicated that, due to equal opportunity laws
in Canada, dual citizens are often not required
to present themselves as such, making it difficult
to monitor possible ITAR violations involving
foreign nationals. MacTaggart also noted that
Canadian companies commonly establish post office
boxes in the United States through which they could receive
shipments, further complicating ITAR enforcement.
¶14. (SBU) Ward echoed many of the sentiments expressed
by ICE Ottawa indicating that at the working level,
the relationship between U.S. law enforcement and
the CBSA/RCMP is good but becomes less cooperative
at higher levels. MacTaggart indicated that a
possible avenue for better U.S.-CA enforcement
cooperation is through DFAIT, as the agency's
international trade component is the
"center of gravity" given its strong interest
in preserving positive U.S.-CA trade relations
and maintaining special status as it relates to the
Canadian exemption. DTCC team
briefed the preliminary results of
Canadian exemption research project, which had been
the basis for several recent Blue Lantern checks,
including an unfavorable check in Toronto. MacTaggart
requested information updates from Washington on
final disposition of Blue Lantern cases so that
Consulate team members can increase their own understanding of
local exporters and possible companies of concern
in the Toronto area.
¶15. (SBU) Comment: PM/DTCC Blue Lantern outreach
team found high interest and strong cooperation
from GOC officials and a motivated and well-informed
Mission Canada team with respect to the conduct
of Blue Lantern end-use monitoring.
The visit also appears to have met the
objectives of improving understanding of the
Blue Lantern end-use monitoring program and
USG munitions export laws and regulations. DTCC
team agreed to further consultations with ICE
attach office as additional results
are obtained regarding the use of the Canadian
exemption for license-free exports to Canada.
Outreach visit achieved goals of improving
industry's understanding of U.S. export control
laws and regulations, strengthening country
team's knowledge of Blue Lantern
program, and enhancing DTCC's understanding
of Canadian defense industry and GOC export/import
and technology security procedures.
¶16. (U) DTCC would like to express its gratitude
to Embassy Ottawa and Missions Montreal and Toronto,
and especially control officer Lori Balbi for
her assistance in arranging and executing this visit.
CLINTON