

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA1522, NEW FOCUS FOR CANADA'S DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA1522.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA1522 | 2005-05-20 15:03 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 OTTAWA 001522
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/CAN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAID ECON PGOV SENV CA
SUBJECT: NEW FOCUS FOR CANADA'S DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
REF: A. OTTAWA 1282 NOTAL (ISP ON TRADE)
¶B. OTTAWA 1190 NOTAL (ISP ON NORTH AMERICA)
¶C. OTTAWA 654 NOTAL (DEBT RELIEF)
¶D. OTTAWA 324 NOTAL (DEBT RELIEF
¶E. COMMISSION FOR AFRICA)
¶1. Summary: Canada is focusing its official development
assistance (ODA) dollara and will be weaning 130 countries
from its bilateral aid programs. The April 19 International
Policy Statement (IPS) confirms that Canada, will concentrate
its development assistance dollars on countries that can use
it most effectively. Aid will focus on five sectors the GOC
considers essential to meeting the Millennium Development
Goals (MDG) and that it believes Canada can support most
effectively, and all programs will be designed with an eye to
promoting gender equality. Within five years, CIDA would
like 67% of bilateral aid to go to 25 "development partners"
as programs in other countries are phased out.
¶2. Although the Prime Minister reiterated the GOC's
decades-old goal of reaching an official development
assistance (ODA) level of 0.7% of GNI, from about 0.26% now,
the GOC has not set a target date. The new policy statement
should make it easier to identify areas of bilateral
cooperation with Canada's International Development Agency
(CIDA). End Summary.
More aid money
--------------
¶3. The Development section of Canada's April 19
International Policy Statement (IPS) contained few surprises
but attracted a surprising amount of (mainly) positive
publicity. Minister Aileen Carroll described the IPS to a
Senate committee on May 11 as an "exciting process" and an
"excellent piece of work," that identifies a niche that
allows CIDA to truly make a difference in the world. The
IPS, initiated by Paul Martin on taking office in November,
2003, confirmed that Canada will continue to increase aid
levels by 8% a year and still plans to double aid to Africa
by 2008-09 (from 2003-04 levels).
¶4. Speaking before the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee,
Minister Carroll explained that the IPS, in addition to
continuing the commitment to increase aid levels by 8% a
year, will accelerate that growth as the fiscal situation
permits. Note: Refs A & B described other elements of the
four-pronged IPS. The text of the policy statement is
available on CIDA's website (among other locations) at
www.acdi-cida.gc.ca . End note.
Focus on five sectors and a theme
---------------------------------
¶5. The IPS introduces a "development partner" paradigm and
specifies five sectors on which Canada's ODA will be
concentrated. All ODA will have the cross-cutting theme of
promoting gender equality.
The sectors of focus are:
-- good governance,
-- health (with a focus on HIV/AIDS),
-- basic education,
-- private sector development and
-- environmental sustainability.
The sectors were selected because they:
-- advance the Millennium Development Goals;
-- support developing countries' expressed needs and
priorities; and
-- are areas in which Canada and Canadians can "add value."
¶6. To support good governance, CIDA will draw on the new
Canada Corps, created to "involve Canadians of all ages and
backgrounds," in partnership with NGOs and the private
sector, to increase engagement in "governance interventions
abroad." The private sector development effort, which is
relatively new to CIDA, will follow up on the March 2004
Martin-Zedillo report (the Commission on the Private Sector
and Development). Environmental sustainability was
considered as a crosscutting theme, but was found to be a
better fit as a separate sector.
More money to fewer countries
-----------------------------
¶7. CIDA plans to focus its efforts and resources on fewer
countries -- 25 "development partners," down from 155 current
bilateral aid recipients. (Note: The target countries are
listed at the end of this message. End note.) The IPS
expands a policy initiated in 2002 of increasing support for
countries with the ability to use aid effectively. The 25
"development partners" were selected on the basis of poverty
(generally meaning per capita income of less than US$1,000 a
year), ability to use aid effectively, and a legacy of
Canadian involvement. The number of target countries was not
pre-set and CIDA managers expected between 20-30 countries to
qualify. Of the 25 countries, most are in Africa and 18 have
per capita income under $500 per year. Programs in current
aid recipient countries that are not target countries will be
gradually phased out over time, but may continue to receive
Canadian assistance through multilateral funding.
What if you don't make the cut as a development partner?
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶8. The 25 "development partner" countries are expected to
receive two-thirds of bilateral development assistance funds
by 2010 (up from 42% now), but the other 130 current aid
recipients won't be abandoned. The remaining third of
bilateral aid funds will cover assistance to failed and
fragile states (Afghanistan, Iraq, Haiti, Sudan) and ongoing
bilateral relationships with countries that don't qualify as
development partners, but in which Canada has a strategic
interest. Some current aid recipient countries (such as
Thailand) are expected to graduate to middle-income status
and the relationship will evolve from one of assistance to
cooperation on mutual interests. Other countries will
continue to receive Canadian aid that is funneled through the
multilateral organizations as bilateral relationships end.
Multilateralism is a theme throughout the IPS, and
multilateral organizations currently distribute about 40% of
GOC aid.
The 0.7% Solution: Someday?
---------------------------
¶9. Most press attention focused on the target of 0.7% of
gross national product (GNI) for ODA, and the fact that the
GOC did not commit to a date for reaching that target. The
issue has particular resonance in Canada because former Prime
Minister Lester Pearson introduced the 0.7% target. The IPS
restates the GOC's long-term commitment to reaching the 0.7%
of GNI goal, but acknowledges that Canada is not at that
level. Martin, in his pre-release statement on April 18,
reiterated support for the 0.7% of GNI goal, but stressed
that Canada is not "in a position to make an unalterable
guarantee as to that it will hit that target by 2015."
¶10. International Cooperation Minister Aileen Carroll (the
head of CIDA) made similar statements to parliamentarians and
in news interviews. In response to a senator's query about
whether Canada wouldn't set a better example by identifying a
date to meet the 0.7% target, Carroll agreed that quantity is
important, but stressed that how Canada gives is, too.
According to the OECD, Canada's ODA increased 12.2% in real
terms from 2003-2004, reaching about 0.26% of GNI.
¶11. Media reports juxtapose the GOC's position with Canada's
solid GDP growth, large annual fiscal surpluses, and the fact
that 11 other countries, many of them less prosperous, have
made a commitment to the 0.7% target. When economist
Jeffrey Sachs visited Canada last year, the media focused on
his bemused response to the GOC's explanation that Canada
could not boost its GDP percentage of foreign aid because the
economy is growing too fast.
¶12. Canada takes a leading role on development assistance
and is active in calling for debt relief for poor countries
(refs C & D), but officials have trouble breaking through the
press, public and politicians' attachment to the 0.7% target.
CIDA officials reiterated that Canada has gone beyond its
Monterrey promise, and they are confident they can do what
they have announced.
Bad timing, but robust policy
-----------------------------
¶13. CIDA distributes about 70% of Canada's ODA, with the
rest funneled through programs managed by the departments of
Finance (to IFIs), Foreign Affairs and other agencies. With
155 recipients, Canada had the most dispersed aid program of
all donors. Over time, an increasing share of funding to
development partners will be direct budget support (although
CIDA would not be comfortable providing budget support in all
cases).
¶14. Canada's 2005 budget, tabled in March, called for an
increase in development assistance of C$3.4 billion (about
US$2.7 billion) over five years with the goal of doubling
assistance from 2001-02 levels. That continues the past
years' commitment to increasing aid by 8% a year, with half
of that increase going to Africa, and includes C$172 million
(about US$138 million) for an initiative (announced in
February) to provide 100% debt relief over the next five
years for poor countries (Refs C & D). The opposition
parties to the right and left of the government have both
called for increases in Canada's ODA and endorsed the 0.7%
target. The IPS commits 5% of Canada's R&D spending to
research into development challenges.
¶15. Unfortunately, release of the IPS coincided with an
outburst of political gamesmanship as the ruling Liberal
Party and the Opposition parties tussled over the future of
the Liberal minority government. The government's successful
maneuvering to avoid a no-confidence vote over the budget
included a deal with the much smaller NDP to increase
spending on social issues, including an additional C$500
million over two years for foreign aid. Yesterday's
successful passage of the budget will both avert immediate
elections and provide a welcome increase of an additional 8%
a year for CIDA.
¶16. When asked about the prospects for the policy statement
should an election be called (which is still possible in the
fall), CIDA officials said that they consider this document
to be robust. The IPS reflects international (and Canadian)
consensus on the key development problems, and it supports
the MDG and the Paris Declaration on aid effectiveness, which
have widespread political support.
All publicity is good publicity?
-------------------------------
¶17. CIDA officials were pleasantly surprised by how positive
the reception of the development section of the IPS has been.
The outline of the development policies has been known since
January, but the list of target countries was new. On the
IPS's release, a high percentage of media coverage touched on
the development segment, with the list of partner countries
and the debate over 0.7% gaining the most attention. Private
sector partners have been positive, with very little
pushback.
¶18. CIDA cited the effective "interdepartmental effort on
electronics" (use of the Internet) as an asset in spreading
the word on the IPS. Traffic on CIDA's website was up by 50%
when the IPS was released, but there were very few phone
calls or e-mails to Public Affairs, indicating that people
were finding the information they needed on line.
Inter-agency coordination
------------------------
¶19. When asked about the IPS's interagency process in
coordinating international policy, CIDA officials point out
that the links between the "3 Ds" (Diplomacy, Development,
and Defense) are most clear in the crisis countries such as
Afghanistan and Haiti, and emphasized that such coordination
will continue. The IPS calls for a "whole-of-government"
approach to development that will coordinate policy on issues
such as debt relief, trade, and environmental problems with
other agencies. START, the newly-created Stabilization and
Reconstruction Taskforce led by Foreign Affairs Canada, will
supplement the current coordination among ministries with a
physical office at FAC, staffed by representatives from each
agency. It will be backed up by CIDA's new "Canada Corps" of
private sector experts.
¶20. The formal policy coordination process is through the
Global Affairs cabinet committee, backed up by committees at
the Deputy Minister and the Assistant Deputy Minister level.
The IPS also commits the GOC to provide an annual
international policy update to parliament, in which CIDA will
participate.
Overlap with MCC
----------------
¶21. Like the Millennium Challenge Account, the IPS sets the
goal of channeling development dollars where they will do the
most good and involving recipient countries in designing
programs. Nine Millennium Challenge Account countries are
also target development partners for Canada. Seven current
MCA countries (Armenia, Georgia, Lesotho, Madagascar, Morocco
and Vanuatu) are not on Canada's list. However, recipients
of GOC aid play a less active role than in the MCC and there
is no separate funding for development partners.
Comment
-------
¶22. Preparing the IPS was a grueling process for the GOC,
but perhaps less so for CIDA than for the other international
affairs agencies. It has a clear mandate with strong
domestic consensus on its role and continued in a direction
it chose three years ago. Morale is good, despite pressures.
However, all is not necessarily rosy.
¶23. When asked by Senators on May 11 about complaints that
CIDA officials are risk averse, Carroll confirmed in strong
terms that they are "pathologically risk averse," and
"terrified of the Auditor General." She pointed out that
continued criticism, such as CIDA receives from the Auditor
General, leads to increased levels of auditing and
accountability at the expense of flexibility. She wants to
"deprocess a marvelous agency," and referred to a
conversation she had just had with former U.S. Senator George
Mitchell, who was in Canada pursuing UN reform, about the
need to get more decision making authority to CIDA reps on
the ground and to get more CIDA personnel out in the field.
Our CIDA contacts are tremendously impressed with Minister
Carroll, citing her energy, concern for staff, and efforts to
create an open and collaborative work environment. There is
strong support at all levels within CIDA for the IPS's goals.
¶24. List of 25 Canadian Development Partners
---------------------------------------------
Africa: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana,
Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal,
Tanzania, Zambia
Americas: Bolivia, Guyana, Honduras, Nicaragua
Asia: Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka,
Vietnam
Europe: Ukraine
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
DICKSON