

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05WELLINGTON650, NEW ZEALAND'S LABOUR PARTY: SEEKING VICTORY IN THE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05WELLINGTON650.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05WELLINGTON650 | 2005-08-25 05:05 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Wellington |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 WELLINGTON 000650
SIPDIS
STATE FOR D (CASTRO), EAP/ANP, EAP/RSP, EAP/EP, INR/EAP
NSC FOR VICTOR CHA AND MICHAEL GREEN
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISA LIZ PHU
PACOM FOR J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/25/2015
TAGS: PREL PGOV NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND'S LABOUR PARTY: SEEKING VICTORY IN THE
CENTER OF MIDDLE EARTH
REF: A. WELLINGTON 642
¶B. WELLINGTON 635
¶C. WELLINGTON 594
¶D. WELLINGTON 566
¶E. WELLINGTON 439
¶F. WELLINGTON 237
¶G. 2004 WELLINGTON 89
Classified By: Charge D'Affaires David R. Burnett,
For Reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
¶1. (C) Summary: Locked in a tougher than expected battle for
votes, a once-confident Labour Party has forsaken its
reputation for fiscal restraint to dish out promises of pork
for students and low- and middle-income families. In the
run-up to New Zealand's September 17 election, Labour also
has played on anti-American sentiment by claiming the
opposition National Party is beholden to U.S. interests and
itching to eliminate the country's iconic anti-nuclear
policy. Just six months ago, Labour appeared to be coasting
to a historic third term in office, the first time a Labour
Government would have served more than six consecutive years
since 1949. But it stumbled badly in May when -- following
six years of large budget surpluses -- its annual budget
disappointed the public by failing to provide immediate tax
cuts.
¶2. (C) Labour appears to be turning around its fortunes with
its election-year gifts. It has also gained ground by
casting National as a party of the rich with a hidden agenda
to destroy social programs. Center-left Labour also appears
to be attracting voters by remaining pragmatic and cautious
in its policies overall, calculating that solidifying its
appeal to the middle of the New Zealand electorate should be
enough to spell victory in the election. Public opinion
polls show Labour widening its lead over National, which had
a slight edge just two months ago. The race is still too
close to call, though. End Summary.
---------------------------
FROM THE LEFT TO THE CENTER
---------------------------
¶3. (C) New Zealand's governing Labour Party occupies the
center-left of the political spectrum. Its election
successes in 1999 and 2002 rested on its ability to build
bridges with two camps: working-class supporters
representing the party's roots, and younger, often
university-educated, urban liberals. Since the center-right
National Party began climbing in the polls in early 2004,
Labour has shifted its focus to consolidate support in the
center, particularly among lower- and middle-income wage
earners.
¶4. (C) Labour supports a strong role for government in
improving life for the country's less advantaged, and
generally backs income redistribution to achieve that end.
Since returning to power in 1999 after nine years in
opposition, Labour has restored some of the cuts in social
spending and rolled back parts of the employer-friendly labor
laws enacted by National-run governments in the 1990s,
exacerbating divergence of investment to Australia.
¶5. (C) On non-economic social policy, the Labour-led
government adheres more closely to its traditional roots. It
legalized (previously de facto) prostitution in 2003 and
enacted a civil union law in 2004 that provides legal
recognition for same-sex and other couples as an alternative
to traditional marriage. Recognizing the risk of promoting
such controversial measures, the Government allowed Labour
and coalition members to vote on both bills according to
their conscience. Here in liberal New Zealand, even most
members of the opposition voted in favor of civil union, but
members of the public opposed to the bill still blame Labour
for its passage.
¶6. (C) Despite such occasional risk-taking, Labour under
Prime Minister Clark has in most respects taken a pragmatic,
centrist and, until recently, fiscally conservative approach
to governing. It has kept a tight rein on overall budget
outlays, even while it ramped up spending on education,
health care and selected social programs. Aided by a strong
economy that increased tax revenues, Labour has produced
budget surpluses for six years and reduced government debt,
on which it now stakes its claim to being a prudent financial
manager. And, as an example of the party's pragmatism,
Labour has risked a rift with its traditional left-wing
allies by aggressively pursuing liberalized trade, both
within the World Trade Organization and in bilateral
agreements (including talks now under way with China).
-----------------------------------
FINDING LOOSE CHANGE UNDER THE SOFA
-----------------------------------
¶7. (C) But under pressure from National, Labour has abandoned
some of its caution and begun to hike spending, aiming to
appeal to middle-of-the-road New Zealanders who had been left
out of the party's social programs and might be tempted by
National's tax cuts. The first move was a Government
announcement in July that it would forgive the interest on
student loans for students who remain in the country, gaining
support not only among students but also among their parents
and grandparents who have watched New Zealand graduates seek
higher-paying jobs overseas to help pay off student loans.
¶8. (C) Next, Labour repackaged and expanded its 2004
showpiece "Working for Families" (WWF) program, originally
designed to increase welfare benefits for the working poor
and large middle-income families. Labour's public
advertisements showcasing WWF originally were to culminate in
triumph this month, in time to ensure Labour's reelection.
But when the public seemed underwhelmed, and drawn instead to
National's pledge to cut taxes for all New Zealanders, Labour
repackaged WWF as "tax relief" and announced on August 18 it
would expand the program to cover 350,000 families at an
estimated annual cost of NZ $400 million (US $277 million).
The move has been applauded by many voters, although others
have reacted with skepticism: the Government had previously
insisted there was no money for tax cuts. (Many of the funds
for expanded WWF allegedly come from higher-than-expected tax
revenues.)
¶9. (C) Matthew Palmer (protect), son of former Labour PM Sir
Geoffrey Palmer, told us that Labour's May budget avoided
spending down the surplus precisely so the Government could
use the money for election year dazzlers as needed. More
spending announcements are to come, he reckons.
----------------------
The Anti-American Card
----------------------
¶10. (C) With Labour battered by the National Party on
domestic issues and bettered by National in the polls
starting in May, the Government opened up a second front with
National: foreign policy. One cabinet member asserted -- but
later could offer no evidence -- that U.S. interests were
providing National with campaign funds and advice (ref D).
Foreign Minister Goff separately accused National of seeking
U.S. advice on how to move New Zealand public opinion to
reverse its ban on nuclear-armed and nuclear-propelled ships
(ref C).
¶11. (C) Labour's spending promises, together with questions
it has raised about National on both domestic and foreign
policy, appear to be paying off: Poll results announced
August 21 showed Labour widening its lead over National from
four to eight points, with Labour at 45 percent approval
versus National at 37 percent.
--------------------
Labour's weak points
--------------------
¶12. (C) In addition to satisfying some voters' suspicions
over Labour's sudden ability to fund election-year bonanzas,
the Party still has some vulnerabilities heading into
elections. "Working for Families" and student loans do
nothing for higher-income wage earners or singles. The large
budget surplus has fueled a public perception that there is
plenty of money available to fund tax cuts, and these groups
now see that Labour has largesse to spend but they will not
benefit. Moreover, Labour has done little to counter
National's claims that the Government bureaucracy, which has
grown significantly under Labour, is taking from taxpayers
money that rightfully belongs to them.
¶13. (C) Labour also still suffers from a perception among
some in the public that the Government is arrogant in its
belief that it knows better than taxpayers how to spend their
money. Similarly, in a land that values the common "bloke,"
Labour officials -- and particularly PM Clark and her circle
of female advisors and confidantes -- often appear obsessed
with political correctness and more interested in fringe
groups than the "mainstream."
¶14. (C) Meanwhile, Labour has had to tread carefully on
issues involving Maori, now that many of these traditional
Labour supporters are being drawn to the Maori Party. While
the loss of Maori support alone will not cost Labour the
race, the Labour Party has taken pains to mollify its Maori
members over clashes on Foreshore and Seabed legislation and
has spent a lot of time campaigning among this electorate.
Maori compose 15 percent of New Zealand's 4 million people.
Even before National's May up-tick in the polls, Labour
leaders warned party members at their Party conference that
the loss of Maori support could threaten the Government's
reelection. But Labour's efforts to attract Maori voters, on
top of the Government's proclivity to afford Maori special
status in cultural and economic programs, alienates many
lower- and middle-income voters the Government is trying to
court.
¶15. (C) Meanwhile, the Labour government's decision to
negotiate a trade deal with China has drawn fire from both
sides of the political spectrum. The Greens criticize
China's environmental and labor records; the trade unions and
some business executives see a threat of even greater
competition with low-wage Chinese manufacturers.
---------------------
Partner or Millstone?
---------------------
¶16. (C) A coalition will likely be needed for whatever party
proves the top vote-getter. Labour currently governs in
coalition with Jim Anderton's Progressive Party and is
supported by United Future on budget and confidence motions
and by the Green Party on a case-by-case basis. While
National and NZ First have demurred on naming their preferred
coalition partners, Labour has declared it would maintain its
ties to the Progressives and strengthen the role of the
Greens.
¶17. (C) The Greens cooled their relations with the Labour
Party when Labour allowed a moratorium on genetically
modified agricultural products to lapse in 2003. In recent
weeks, however, PM Clark has joined Green Party co-leader
Jeanette Fitzsimmons on the campaign trail. While Labour has
likely sapped some Green support with its student loan
program, Labour wants the Greens to receive at least 5
percent of the vote, the minimum required for a party to be
represented in Parliament. This would keep the Greens as a
viable coalition partner. By campaigning so closely with the
Greens, Labour risks belying it's hard-won image as a
centrist Party, however. (NB: We will report septel on the
implications for the United States of this and other possible
coalitions.)
-------------------
Leader: Helen Clark
-------------------
¶18. (C) Helen Elizabeth Clark, 55, has served continuously in
Parliament since 1981 and as Prime Minister since December
¶1999. She has served as Minister of Housing and
Conservation, Minister of Health and Deputy Prime Minister
and was leader of the opposition during the National
administrations from 1993 to 1999. She is a political
survivor. David Lange, the former prime minister who died
August 13, wrote in his autobiography that Clark kept out of
discussions of the economic reforms of the late 1980s. While
some Labour members suffered politically due to public
backlash over the pace and breadth of the reforms, Clark
emerged untarnished. Many people forget that she was nearly
toppled as leader by Michael Cullen, now the deputy prime
minister, in the 1990s.
¶19. (C) With an approach deemed managerial if not
micro-managerial, Clark is closely engaged in virtually every
policy decision. She holds nearly absolute influence and
authority over her party and cabinet. Such centralized
control contributes to a dearth of young Labour
leaders-in-waiting, raising concern in the party about who
would follow Clark and Cullen. Clark is believed to want to
head an influential world organization after she leaves
office. Clark regularly beats National's Don Brash and other
opposition Party leaders in polls asking Kiwis to name their
"preferred Prime Minister."
Burnett