

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09UNVIEVIENNA284, KEY PARIS PACT MEMBERS URGE RESULTS RATHER THAN MEETINGS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09UNVIEVIENNA284.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09UNVIEVIENNA284 | 2009-06-18 09:09 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | UNVIE |
VZCZCXRO1990
OO RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHDIR RUEHKUK RUEHTRO
DE RUEHUNV #0284/01 1690911
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 180911Z JUN 09
FM USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9601
INFO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1672
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
AFGHA/AFGHANISTAN COLLECTIVE
RUCNIRA/IRAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 0102
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 UNVIE VIENNA 000284
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KCRM PREL PTER SNAR UN AF PK CA RU IT UK SW AS
NL, FR, GM
SUBJECT: KEY PARIS PACT MEMBERS URGE RESULTS RATHER THAN MEETINGS
REF: A: UNVIE VIENNA 249
¶B. UNVIE 006
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: In an informal June 9 meeting, key Paris Pact
members agreed to continue their support for the Pact. They also
agreed to use 2010 to review the implementation of recommendations
from three past roundtables -- precursors, financial flows, and
cross-border management. In addition, they proposed benchmarks to
guide the review. For precursors, proposed benchmarks include
seizure statistics, prosecution rates, countries involved in
operations, and information sharing. For financial flows, proposed
benchmarks are prosecution rates, ratification of the relevant
United Nations instruments to combat terrorist financing, number of
accounts seized, and implementation of legal frameworks to combat
corruption. For cross-border management, proposed benchmarks are
seizures at the border, and quality and effectiveness of
cross-border information sharing. Participants at the June 9 meeting
agreed to have these ideas considered by the next annual Policy
Consultative Group (PCG) meeting scheduled for November/December
¶2009. On behalf of the June 9 meeting participants, Counselor
forwarded these conclusions to the independent consultant who will
include the review of past round tables as a recommendation in his
evaluation report on the Paris Pact for UNODC. Besides the
conclusions on the review and the benchmarks, meeting participants
also heard Russia advocate partnership with regional bodies in which
Russia plays a leadership role. Russia and France also advocated
greater Paris Pact involvement in the implementation of UN Security
Council resolutions. END SUMMARY.
-----------------------------
Challenges for the Paris Pact
-----------------------------
¶2. (SBU) In the wake of the briefing by the independent consultant
(Neil Bailey of UK's Omega Consultancy) UNODC hired to evaluate the
Paris Pact (Ref A), Counselor hosted an informal meeting of core
Paris Pact member states on June 9 to discuss ways to improve the
Pact's operational effectiveness. Representatives from Australia,
Canada, France Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Russia, Sweden and U.K.
attended this meeting. All present agreed that their countries
would continue to support the Paris Pact because it serves a useful
political purpose by bringing together countries some of which have
few other channels for interacting with one another. Nevertheless,
all have been frustrated by the paucity of concrete results from the
15 annual expert roundtables which have been held since 2003.
¶3. (SBU) Canada criticized UNODC for giving the same presentations
at expert roundtables and at the annual Policy Consultative Group
(PCG) meetings. Some also criticized the growing propensity for
certain countries to send diplomats rather than experts to the
roundtables, thus directing focus on political rather than
operational issues. UK stressed the importance of roundtable
participation by "the right people and the right countries,"
particularly because the Paris Pact had not been well-attended by
critical central Asian countries. Counselor suggested establishing
focal points of contact to encourage information sharing among
experts. France noted that focal points already exist in the
Automated Donor Assistance Mechanism (ADAM) but are insufficient.
Others did not embrace the focal points idea, claiming that ADAM has
been largely ineffective.
------------------------------
Picking Roundtables for Review
------------------------------
¶4. (SBU) Counselor proposed that member states should use the next
annual Policy Consultative Group (PCG) meeting, in November/December
2009, to review past accomplishments, rather than to choose new
topics for the next three roundtables in 2010. All agreed the Pact
should not be a forum for indefinite roundtables, and member states
should find ways to evaluate the implementation of recommendations
from past round tables. They also agreed with Counselor's
suggestion to choose two or three past roundtables for such an
evaluation. There was consensus that past roundtables on
precursors, financial flows and cross-border cooperation should be
selected for such review, and that instead of selecting new topics,
the November/December 2009 PCG meeting should adopt the idea to
review the three past roundtables in 2010.
--------------------
Choosing Benchmarks
UNVIE VIEN 00000284 002 OF 003
--------------------
¶5. (SBU) Participants then discussed benchmarks for measuring the
results of these past roundtables. Counselor noted that on the
margins of the last PCG meeting in December 2008, Ambassadors (of
the countries represented at the June 9 meeting) had urged UNODC to
develop metrics to measure the success of the Pact (Ref B). Germany
suggested that it would be helpful to solicit UNODC and country
feedback on implementation to date. Canada reminded attendees that
some recommendations had been implemented and integrated into
UNODC's Rainbow Strategy, so examining those recommendations would
be a good place to start with the review. Following French
suggestions, meeting participants reached consensus that for
precursors, benchmarks should include seizure statistics,
prosecution rates, countries involved in operations, and information
sharing. For financial flows, the benchmarks should include
prosecution rates, ratification of the relevant United Nations
instruments to combat terrorist financing, number of accounts
seized, and implementation of legal frameworks to combat corruption.
For cross-border management, proposed benchmarks are seizures at
the border, and quality and effectiveness of cross-border
information sharing.
-----------------------------
Russian and French Comments
-----------------------------
¶6. (SBU) Russia advocated greater Paris Pact cooperation with
regional bodies such as the Collective Security Treaty Organization
(CSTO) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). It also
urged Paris Pact involvement in the implementation and enforcement
of UN Security Council resolutions by listing suspected traffickers
and terrorists. France supported the use of UN Security Council
resolutions, especially in the area of sanctions. However, the
French representative suggested that Vienna's Friends of Afghanistan
Group, rather than the Paris Pact, may be a more suitable venue for
tackling the issue of sanctions.
¶7. (SBU) In addition, France noted that other regions, such as the
Andean countries, were modeling parts of their multilateral
counternarcotics efforts on the Paris Pact. He also urged improved
regional cooperation in Central Asia, an early goal of the Pact
which he said has not yet been realized.
------------------
Follow up Action
------------------
¶8. (U) Counselor summarized the conclusions for the attendees, and
offered to forward them to independent consultant Neil Bailey for
incorporation in the evaluation report he is preparing for UNODC.
She circulated the drafted conclusions among the meeting
participants on June 10. (Text follows in Annex, para 10.) With no
objections from them, she forwarded the conclusions to Bailey on
June 15. Bailey replied that he agreed with the conclusions and
would include the review of past round tables as a recommendation in
his report to the UNODC.
-------
Comment
-------
¶9. (SBU) The Paris Pact was conceived in 2003 from a great idea -
to coordinate and improve regional cooperation to fight Afghan
narcotics. Although it has definitely achieved some successes, it
also has become more of a forum for meetings than for action. UNODC
was wise to seek an independent evaluation - the second in the Pact
history - before proceeding to a third phase. We hope that the
conclusions from our informal June 9 meeting will help the Paris
Pact to focus more on results rather than meetings. End Comment.
-----
Annex
-----
¶9. (U) The following text was circulated among the June 9 meeting
participants and forwarded to the independent consultant.
BEGIN QUOTE: Representatives of the following permanent missions in
Vienna met June 9 to discuss ways to make Paris Pact more effective.
The participating countries in the meeting were: Australia, Canada,
France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Russia, Sweden, U.K. and U.S.
The participants made the following recommendations to improve Paris
Pact: 1) All present want to continue to support the Paris Pact, 2)
However, all agree that the Pact should not be an indefinite round
UNVIE VIEN 00000284 003 OF 003
of roundtables. Instead, there should be some stocktaking of how
recommendations from past roundtables have been implemented. A
practical way to do it is to choose two or three of past roundtables
for in-depth follow up and review, 3) Therefore, at the annual
policy consultative group meeting in November/December 2009, member
states should decide not decide new topics for the three roundtables
in 2010. Instead, they should decide to use 2010 to review the
implementation of the recommendations of three past roundtables, 4)
There was agreement to choose the following three roundtables for
review: a)Precursors, b)Financial flows, c)Cross-border
cooperation., 5) There was also agreement that benchmarks should be
established for such review. Proposed benchmarks include: a) For
precursors: seizure statistics, prosecution rates, countries
involved in operations, and information sharing; b) For Financial
flows: Prosecution rates, ratification of FATF, number of accounts
seized, implementation of legal frameworks to combat corruption, and
efforts to combat terrorist financing; implementation of the UNSC
resolutions against terrorist financing., c) Cross-border
cooperation, with focus on the immediate neighbors at this point
(Pakistan and Iran): information-sharing, communication, joint
border exercises. END QUOTE
SCHULTE