

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07BERLIN834, SECOND G-8 NONPROLIFERATION DIRECTORS' GROUP
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07BERLIN834.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07BERLIN834 | 2007-04-24 17:05 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Berlin |
VZCZCXYZ0003
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHRL #0834/01 1141743
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 241743Z APR 07
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8050
INFO RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 8201
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1778
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1022
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 8729
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 0469
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 1446
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA PRIORITY 0259
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
UNCLAS BERLIN 000834
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR ISN, EUR, WHA, CAN, EAP/J
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM MNUC PREL ETTC GM JA RS CA UK FR IT
SUBJECT: SECOND G-8 NONPROLIFERATION DIRECTORS' GROUP
(NPDG) MEETING IN BERLIN, MARCH 30, 2007
REF: A. BERLIN 791
¶B. BERLIN 376
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The second G-8 Nonproliferation Directors
Group (NPDG) meeting under the German G-8 Presidency was held
March 30 in Berlin. The delegates discussed the need for
Germany to produce soon a draft statement on nonproliferation
for the June G-8 Summit. The delegates also agreed that the
Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) Preparatory Committee
(PrepCom) should avoid wrangling over procedural issues.
Concerning nuclear fuel cycle issues, the delegates agreed on
the need to convince potential users that proposals on
enrichment and reprocessing (ENR) are not intended to deprive
them of nuclear fuel for peaceful uses. The delegates were
very interested in the status of U.S.-India talks on the
proposed 123 Agreement on civil nuclear cooperation. The
delegates also discussed making progress in the Nuclear
Suppliers' Group, Conference on Disarmament, The Hague Code
of Conduct, the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), the
Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), UNSCR 1540
implementation, and the IAEA Additional Protocol. Lastly,
Germany appealed to the U.S. and Russia to invite EU
institutions to participate in Global Initiative to Combat
Nuclear Terrorism activities. End summary.
-------------------------------------------
Draft Statement for Heiligendamm G-8 Summit
-------------------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) German Chair Ruediger Luedeking, MFA Deputy
Commissioner for Arms Control and Disarmament, opened the
meeting by discussing a draft statement on nonproliferation
to be issued at the June G-8 Summit in Heiligendamm. He said
the goal is for a succinct Summit statement that avoids
repetitions from previous years' statements. He said the
German Government will circulate the draft to the other G-8
partners and solicit input prior to the scheduled April 24
NPDG meeting (Note: Which was later cancelled. End note.)
-------------------
NPT PrepCom Meeting
-------------------
¶3. (SBU) Luedeking then turned to the agenda items, beginning
with a discussion of the NPT PrepCom, scheduled for April
30-May 11 in Vienna. The delegates agreed a good start is
important for the current NPT five-year review cycle. DAS
Andrew Semmel urged setting the PrepCom agenda right away
instead of allowing protracted debate on procedural issues,
such as happened at the 2005 Review Conference (RevCon). DAS
Semmel also cautioned that Iran could try to hijack the
PrepCom and pit the Nonaligned Movement (NAM) members against
the nuclear supplier states. Luedeking urged the G-8
partners to support PrepCom Chairman Yukiya Amano's approach
used in previous RevCons, including the 2000 meeting, as
models for conducting work at the next RevCon. DAS Semmel
noted the U.S. does not consider some previous RevCons as
ideal models. In particular, the U.S. is concerned about the
use of the 2000 RevCon, since the U.S. no longer supports all
of the 13 steps toward nuclear disarmament agreed to at that
time. DAS Semmel urged the NPT to set a more balanced agenda
and to produce a more balanced statement, said the U.S. is
ready for discussion of Article VI concerning disarmament,
and called for more attention to Article X concerning NPT
withdrawal. He said the U.S. shared talking points with
Amano and will discuss them and other issues at the PrepCom,
despite Iran's reluctance to consider Article X. Luedeking,
summarizing the discussion, said Article X will be important
at the PrepCom, that a focus on the peaceful use of atomic
energy should be emphasized, that outreach work should be
done to convince the NAM signatories that our approach to
Article IV is not designed to deny them nuclear technology,
and that Iran should not be allowed to radicalize the NAM
members.
--------------------------------------------- ----
Multilateral Approaches to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶4. (SBU) After the NPDG partners discussed this agenda item,
Luedeking summarized the discussion as follows: the G-8
partners have broad consensus for giving assurances for the
nuclear fuel cycle, but nonproliferation is the driving
concern. The G-8 partners have made a number of proposals to
the IAEA on this issue, but are now waiting for the IAEA to
advance them to the Board of Governors in June. Because it
is an important and sensitive issue for the NAM, the G-8
partners should engage potential users to convince them the
proposals are not aimed at depriving them of their right to
the peaceful use of nuclear fuel. In addition, the delegates
agreed Iran would likely try to manipulate discussion of the
nuclear fuel cycle to its advantage. DAS Semmel noted the
overlap among the assured nuclear fuel supply proposals under
evaluation by the IAEA, but he also said it is not
contradictory to pursue both nonproliferation and the goals
of Article IV on the peaceful uses of atomic energy.
--------------------------------------------- ------------
NSG Issues, U.S.-India Talks on Civil Nuclear Cooperation
--------------------------------------------- ------------
¶5. (SBU) DAS Semmel updated the NPDG delegates on the status
of U.S.-India talks on civil nuclear energy cooperation.
Luedeking said because Germany will chair the NSG in 2008, he
is interested in the sequence of events for the proposed 123
Agreement and other steps in the process. He also asked
about the conditions and certifications under the Hyde Act,
whether the conditions are being met, and, specifically,
about the issue of perpetual safeguards and what would happen
if India conducted any nuclear tests. DAS Semmel said the
U.S. and India have achieved a single bracketed text for the
123 Agreement at the most recent negotiating session and now
clearly understand which points still need to be negotiated.
One reason for delay in the 123 Agreement process is the
domestic sensitivities in India, DAS Semmel said. The U.S.
position is that the agreement should provide for safeguards
in perpetuity. If India detonates a nuclear device, U.S. law
would require an end to civil nuclear cooperation and the
right to repossess the nuclear technology provided to India.
This is a point of contention with India, DAS Semmel noted.
Another point of contention concerns the U.S. ban on
transferring nuclear fuel enrichment and reprocessing (ENR)
technology to countries that do not already possess it,
because India wants advance consent rights on reprocessing
and access to reprocessing technology. DAS Semmel also said
India is committed to the FMCT, even though India and the
U.S. may differ on FMCT policy. The President will have to
certify to Congress that India is fulfilling its FMCT
commitment as well as make other certifications prior to
Congressional consideration of the agreement.
¶6. (SBU) Luedeking discussed preparations for the April 16-18
NSG Consultative Group Meeting in Cape Town. Germany passed
out a Point of Contact Note, NSG(07)14, containing a German
proposal, and asked for comments. Luedeking said the
proposal's goal is to create a new status between NSG members
and non-adherents to ensure that as nuclear technical
expertise spreads to new recipients that are not NSG members
they will still follow the NSG Guidelines. The Canadian and
Italian delegates supported the proposal. The French
delegate cautioned against creating a new category for now
because of concern that the NSG would be charged with
applying double standards. Germany asked G-8 partners to try
to reach agreement in principle on the concept of their
proposal in Cape Town while leaving details to be worked out
later.
¶7. (SBU) Luedeking queried the U.S. on the prospects that it
will accept within the NSG a criteria-based approach to ENR
transfers. DAS Semmel repeated the U.S. stance of opposing
ENR transfers to countries that do not already possess the
technology. After some comments, Luedeking said the issue
needs to be resolved. (Note: None of the partners raised
dropping the rolling one-year moratorium on ENR transfers
from this year's G-8 Summit Statement, as happened in
previous NPDG meetings. This development may have been due
to the absence of the normal Canadian representative, who had
pressed this issues most vigorously in past meetings. End
note.)
-------------------------
Conference on Disarmament
-------------------------
¶8. (SBU) Luedeking noted that at its March 30 meeting the CD
was unable to agree on the P-6 proposal for organizing work
in Part II of the 2007 session because several delegations
had lacked instructions. The CD members agreed in principle
on an intersessional meeting in late April, but were unable
to agree on a date. The Japanese delegate urged the G-8 to
demarche CD members jointly, urging support for the P-6
proposal. Japan circulated draft talking points and
solicited input.
¶9. (SBU) Russian Delegate Anatolij Antonov said Russia wants
the CD to make some progress. He said Russia has demarched
China on the FMCT and is still waiting for a response.
Concerning the proposed G-8 talking points, Antonov said
Russia considered them as mis-characterizing the P-6
proposal. He urged the G-8 to put the priorities in the
first paragraph. Russia's priority, he noted, is outer space
and not the FMCT.
¶10. (SBU) Luedeking suggested the NPDG review the talking
points, keeping in mind Russia's points about not quibbling
over priorities. He said Germany would circulate the draft
talking points, gather the NPDG input, revise them, and issue
a G-8 demarche to the CD members. (Note: After circulating
the draft, France could not agree to the text of a joint
demarche, so eventually Germany, as G-8 President, made it
unilaterally. End note.)
----------------------------
Hague Code of Conduct (HCOC)
----------------------------
¶11. (SBU) Luedeking said the HCOC is an instrument with
modest objectives and diminished effectiveness because of a
lack of authority and non-participation by countries such as
China and India. Antonov voiced Russia's concerns about the
HCOC, saying 70 percent of the information provided to the
HCOC comes from Russia and other countries were not committed
enough to the HCOC. Luedeking, in turn, noted three issues
for Germany: (1) the lack of participation, indicating
declining interest in the HCOC, (2) the need to convince
other countries, such as China and India, to participate, and
(3) the importance of compliance with the HCOC's
confidence-building measures. Luedeking also urged the G-8
to conduct more outreach activities and to consider the
production of an annual report.
--------------------------------------------- ----------------
Chemical Weapons Convention and Biological Weapons Convention
--------------------------------------------- ----------------
¶12. (SBU) Germany circulated a paper on the 10th anniversary
of the CWC. Russian Delegate Antonov and DAS Semmel reported
on the destruction to date of chemical weapons stocks of
their respective countries. Both also noted the difficult
prospect of destroying all CW stocks by the 2012 deadline.
All delegates voiced support for the CWC. Luedeking, noting
the difficulty of CWC verification, said complacency could
become a problem. Concerning the BWC, Luedeking said the EU
will provide input to the BWC intersessional meeting.
Germany circulated a report on the G-8 Forensic Epidemiology
Workshop held March 13-15, 2007, in London. Antonov said
Russia's position was that epidemiology should be excluded
from the G-8 Summit Statement.
-------------------------------------
Regional Issues: Iran and North Korea
-------------------------------------
¶13. (SBU) Luedeking said Iran would be discussed at the April
3 Political Directors' meeting in Berlin. Saying the
situation in Iran is changing, Luedeking noted that G-8
partners could not agree on Summit Statement language until
later. The British delegate said the UK is grateful for G-8
support over the Iranian seizure of British sailors and
marines. He said the UK is not linking the detention to the
UNSCR 1747 sanctions on Iran.
¶14. (SBU) Japanese Delegate Takeshi Nakane said Japan
regretted that the Six Parties had been unable to enter talks
yet over freezing the DPRK's nuclear facilities. Germany
briefed the partners on a March 6-8 EU Troika visit to
P'yongyang. During that visit, the DPRK said it favored
complete de-nuclearization of the Korean Peninsula so long as
it receives assurances from the U.S. The DPRK also said it
would like better relations with the EU. Luedeking noted
that the EU should not be expected to contribute funding as
part of any settlement with the DPRK since the EU was not at
the table, but that the EU would continue to support the
Six-Party talks diplomatically. French Delegate Carre said
if the agreement progresses, it will be a positive signal to
Iran to end its nuclear activities outside of IAEA safeguards.
-----------------------------------
UNSCR 1540, IAEA Safeguards, and GI
-----------------------------------
¶15. (SBU) Luedeking discussed G-8 demarches on UNSCR 1540
implementation and the IAEA Additional Protocol. He noted
that universalization is the goal for both. Luedeking
reported Germany had delivered two sets of demarches on
implementing UNSCR 1540, with some countries responding
favorably. Luedeking also said Germany would deliver
demarches on the Additional Protocol. DAS Semmel suggested a
G-8 Foreign Ministers' letter, recalling how effective the
U.S.-led 2004 Foreign Ministers' letter on IAEA Safeguards
was. To Luedeking's objection that too many Foreign
Ministers' letters would diminish their impact, DAS Semmel
advised sending a letter only to countries which had not
signed the Safeguards and/or Additional Protocol. DAS Semmel
also observed the work for making demarches on
universalization does not have to be completed by the G-8
Summit but could be spread throughout 2007.
¶16. (SBU) Luedeking urged the U.S. and Russia to invite EU
institutions to participate in Global Initiative activities.
He said inviting EU institutions would not set a precedent
for inviting other international organizations. Luedeking
also maintained only certain institutions, namely EURATOM,
had the necessary competencies to oversee nuclear activities
in the EU member states. Russian Delegate Antonov observed
that although every EU member state beyond the original
invitees had been asked to join individually, only Greece had
accepted. French Delegate Carre agreed that although
individual EU states should be more active the GI would be
more effective if the appropriate EU institutions could
participate. The EU delegate said a paper could be prepared
on EU competencies relevant to the GI and making the case for
EU participation in the GI.
¶17. (U) This cable was coordinated with DAS Semmel subsequent
to the delegation's departure.
TIMKEN JR