

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06MEXICO7054, MEDIA WARS: THE CONTINUING DEBATE OVER
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06MEXICO7054.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06MEXICO7054 | 2006-12-22 19:07 | 2011-03-17 12:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Mexico |
Appears in these articles: http://wikileaks.jornada.com.mx/notas/hay-preocupacion-de-que-el-duopolio-televisivo-sigue-ejerciendo-influencia-sobre-poderes-judicial-y-legislativo |
VZCZCXRO2903
PP RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #7054/01 3561913
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 221913Z DEC 06
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4700
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAFCC/FCC WASHDC PRIORITY
90779
2006-12-22 19:13:00
06MEXICO7054
Embassy Mexico
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
06MEXICO1080
VZCZCXRO2903
PP RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #7054/01 3561913
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 221913Z DEC 06
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4700
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAFCC/FCC WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 MEXICO 007054
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE: WHA/MX FOR MATT ROTH, EB/CIP FOR NICK FETCHKO; USTR
FOR JONATHAN MCHALE, CATHERINE HINKLEY; FCC FOR EMILY
TALAGA; DOC FOR GERI WORD
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ECPS MX EINV
SUBJECT: MEDIA WARS: THE CONTINUING DEBATE OVER
ESTABLISHING A THIRD TV NETWORK IN MEXICO
REF: MEXICO 1080
¶1. (U) Summary: The new head of the Secretariat of
Transportation and Communications (SCT) Luis Tellez has been
sending mixed signals this past week over whether or not the
Calderon administration will push for the opening of a third
television broadcast channel in Mexico. Both Tellez and a
commissioner of Cofetel have been quoted as saying that
Q&additional analysisQ8 is required before granting a license
for a new company to compete with broadcast television
duopolists Televisa and TV Azteca. For their part, the two
broadcasters have continued to attack potential rival General
Electric (GE) and its Mexican partner Isaac Saba. The debate
has also reached the halls of the Senate. Even if the new
government does indeed press for a third station, the steps
that need to be taken to open the doors to a new channel in
Mexico still remain unclear. Some analysts claim that the
apparent hesitancy is due not to inexperience in opening new
licenses but to lack of political will. End Summary.
Mixed Signals from SCT
----------------------
¶2. (U) Media reported on December 14 that Tellez had met
earlier in the week with Cofetel to inform the commissioners
of president Felipe CalderonQ,s goal of opening the market to
a third television broadcaster. Currently, Televisa controls
258 of MexicoQ,s 455 television stations while TV Azteca
controls 179. The two companies are responsible for 80% of
television concessions and 90% of audiovisual content in
Mexico. According to unconfirmed reports in the media, which
were later rejected by Cofetel commissioner Eduardo Ruiz
Vega, Tellez informed Cofetel that it should work with the
SCT to find a way to counter the duopoly and find a legal
formula to open the way for NBC-Telemundo to enter the
market. Columnist Dar!o Celis of Reforma charged that Tellez
had threatened the Cofetel commissioners not to make public
their discussion.
¶3. (U) On December 15, however, Tellez held his first press
conference as head of the SCT and evaded directly answering
questions about authorizing a third television network. He
said that CalderonQ,s plans do not include a third national
network, but instead focus on licensing regional radio and
television channels. Tellez did say that the GOM would be
ready to open the fixed telecommunications sector and media
to greater foreign investment, but only if the United States
and other countries open their radio and television markets
to Mexican companies. The statement may have been in
reference to NBC/UniversalQ,s suit filed with the FCC against
TV AztecaQ,s participation in KAZA in Los Angeles.
Undersecretary for Communications Rafael del Villar said at
the press conference that the idea for a third channel had
not been rejected but that it would Q&be analyzed.Q8
¶4. (U) On December 14, media reported Cofetel commissioner
Gerardo Gonz lez Abarca as saying that the conditions do not
yet exist in Mexico to merit the licensing of a third
national television channel in the short run. He claimed
that Q&Mexico does not have experience in licensing radio and
television frequencies Q( and there is no study over the real
necessity of a new alternative, or above all of the type of
content that should be offered (by a third channel).Q8 In
order to create these conditions, Gonz lez Abarca said it is
necessary to reach agreement between Hacienda (the
Secretariat of Finance), the SCT, the Secretariat of
SIPDIS
Governance (Segob), and Cofetel. Gonz lez did recognize that
opening a licensing process in the first trimester of 2007 is
one of Felipe CalderonQ,s promises for his first 100 days in
office, though Secretary Tellez denied this in his press
conference the next day.
The Politics of TV
------------------
¶5. (U) The debate on opening a third channel has also surged
in the Senate. PAN senators Federico DQring and Marco
Antonio CortQs Mendoza (both on the SenateQ,s Radio,
Television, and Cinema (RTC) Committee) came out in favor of
a serious debate on the issue, saying that the Federal Radio
and Television law need to be revised, particularly regarding
the regulation of content. DQring acknowledged that there
are frequencies available for a third channel, and said that
the idea of a third network formed by educational and
cultural stations should not be discarded. However, DQring
MEXICO 00007054 002 OF 003
also accused PRD senator Ricardo Monreal, who is not on the
RTC committee, and his party of trying to pressure the
Calderon government to open a third network through
Q&political beatings and insultsQ8 directed at Secretary
Tellez. The president of the RTC, PRD senator Carlos Sotelo,
has not commented on the issue. One PRI senator on the
committee voiced objection to opening the sector, claiming
that it would run the risk of augmenting the exorbitant costs
of political campaigns.
¶6. (SBU) Comment: The political nature of the debate becomes
more apparent every day, from the rumors of Q&secretQ8
meetings between Secretary Tellez and Cofetel to TellezQ,s
denial of such a meeting and carefully worded, ambiguous
statements on the subject. Cofetel commissioner Gonz lez in
the daily Q&El FinancieroQ8 accused the old SCT leaders of
leaving Cofetel with Q&a hot potato.Q8 Q&You have to ask the
ex-officials (of the SCT) why they didnQ,t grant new
frequencies or commence licensing in their six years in
office.Q8 The answer is likely that they lacked the
political will to do so. Though no officials like to admit
it, the PRI senator's objection may explain why: candidates
depend on Televisa and TV Azteca for advertising during the
political campaigns. PRD's support of a third channel stems
from its opposition to the so-called Q&Televisa LawQ8 passed
by Congress in April (reftel), which the PRD and others
condemned as strengthening the existing duopoly. Televisa
and Azteca in turn angered PRD leaders with their coverage of
the hotly contested presidential election and CalderonQ,s
inauguration. End Comment.
Televisa and Azteca Pick a Fight
--------------------------------
¶7. (U) Outside the political realm, the media wars rage on as
Televisa and TV Azteca continue their coordinated attack on
Mexican businessman Isaac Saba and his Grupo Xtra, General
Electric's (GE) partner in Palmas 26. GE, owner of
NBC/Universal and Telemundo, formed Palmas 26 with Grupo Xtra
in April, and the partnership was approved by the GOM in May.
In September, Palmas 26 officially requested that Cofetel
and SCT start the process needed for a spectrum auction to
open a new network. Since November 20, Mexicans have been
treated a series of almost nightly Q&exposQsQ8 on both
Televisa and TV Azteca news program, delving into the world
of pharmaceutical distributors. The programs blamed two
dominant companies, most prominently Isaac SabaQ,s Grupo
Saba, in that industry for killing Mexicans because of the
high price of medicines. Both networks have aired interviews
with sick and dying Mexicans dependent on medications, as
well as with the new Secretary of Health and the president of
the Federal Competitive Commission (CFC), to demonstrate how
Casa Saba and the other major firm controlling pharmaceutical
distribution in Mexico, the Nadro company, had created a
monopolistic market, contributing to the deaths of thousands
of Mexicans. The interview with CFC president Eduardo PQrez
Motta was a particularly interesting inclusion, since PQrez
Motta had recently advised Congress that opening a third
network would be good for competition. In late November, the
CFC also issued a recommendation to open the spectrum and to
develop mechanisms to prevent monopolies from building in
broadcasting.
¶8. (U) One reporter for duopolist TV Azteca noted:
Q&It is almost impossible to think that someone can create
competition in this country, not even foreign competition.
If some company from the United States or Canada wanted to
compete with Casa Saba, it couldn't because it is prohibited
by NAFTA. Q( The worst is that neither Mexican laws nor
international treaties have been able to impede Isaac Saba
and his empire in the pain they cause Mexicans.Q8 End quote.
¶9. (U) The irony of TV Azteca, which has so strongly fought
against Telemundo entering the Mexican market, condemning
NAFTA for not allowing foreign investment, has not been lost
on other media outlets. Radio and print media commentators
quickly picked up on the connection between the reports on
Casa Saba and Palmas 26Q,s attempt to enter the television
market, while acknowledging that the high price of medicine
is indeed a problem in MexicoQ*and has been for decades. On
December 7, TV Azteca turned its attention to GE as well as
Isaac Saba. The network's news reporters described the
Q&black history Q( a story of impunity, abuses, and
injusticesQ8 of the Saba family, which Q&has made its fortune
MEXICO 00007054 003 OF 003
on the suffering of millions of MexicansQ8 through Casa Saba
and its other companies. The reporter went on to say, Q&All
this is not enough, and now Isaac Saba Raffoul plans to unite
with General Electric, a transnational company accused of
unfair monopolistic practices, deception, fraud, and all that
you can imagine.Q8 He detailed cases brought against GE in
the 1980s and 1990s, as well as problems the company has had
in Japan and Spain.
¶10. (U) GE, for its part, responded to the attacks
immediately with a paid announcement in newspapers and
through radio and newspaper interviews with the company's
Mexico director Rafael D!az Granados. D!az drew the line
between Palmas 26 and the Televisa/TV Azteca attacks clearly,
telling one radio reporter that the Azteca program Q&is very
much related to GEQ,s public interest in participating in
MexicoQ,s television market. It seems to us at GE that this
is another attempt on the part of the television company to
impede free competition Q( we consider this to be part of a
strategy on the part of the duopoly that wants to protect
itself and avoid the participation of GE and its partners in
the media market.Q8 Isaac Saba and Casa Saba have refused
to comment on the media attacks.
Comment
-------
¶11. (SBU) So far, the Televisa/TV Azteca exposQs have done
little more than provoke some discussion in Congress over the
price of medications- and more than a little discussion
within the SCT, Congress, and the press over the options for
opening a third national network. By apparently coordinating
an attack on Casa Saba, Televisa and TV Azteca have
demonstrated exactly why Mexico needs another competitor in
the television market. Still, regulators seem hesitant to be
seen as favoring Telemundo. Cofetel commissioner Gonz lez
said to Q&El Financiero,Q8 Q&From what I know, only one
company has expressed interest in this opening (of the TV
market) and that is Palmas 26; but we cannot open the process
for only one company, neither can we fix a price or a
concession fee for only one interested party.Q8
¶12. (SBU) For the moment, any talk of opening a third network
in Mexico is just talk. After stories in the media that
Tellez was pushing Cofetel to immediately look into setting
procedures to grant a license for a third network, Tellez and
del Villar seemed to backtrack in their press conference,
focusing on the need for studies to examine the necessity of
a new network and the content it might provide. Even without
studies, setting up a licensing and concession process could
take years. If they are serious about opening licensing for
an additional national TV network or networks, CalderonQ,s
team should set a clear timeline for opening the television
market, both regionally and at a national level, and enforce
deadlines for when Cofetel must issue guidance on the
licensing process.
¶13. (SBU) In meetings over the coming months with the new
Calderon government, Post will stress the importance of
encouraging competition, especially in the telecommunications
sector. Given commissioner Gonz lezQ,s assertion that Mexico
lacks experience in licensing, we also encourage views from
Washington as to how to provide support to Cofetel and the
SCT on the licensing process. Competition is not the only
issue in play here. MexicoQ,s laws limit foreign investment
in the country's media. Earlier in December, Senator Javier
Orozco demanded vigilance of GEQ,s role in Palmas 26, and
Secretary Tellez alluded to the U.S.Q,s own restrictions on
SIPDIS
foreign ownership of media in his press conference.
Visit Mexico City's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/mexicocity
BASSETT