

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 04HALIFAX40, ATLANTIC CANADA/STATEOF MAINE: ELECTRIC AND NATURAL GAS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04HALIFAX40.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
04HALIFAX40 | 2004-02-10 15:03 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED | Consulate Halifax |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 HALIFAX 000040
SIPDIS
COMMERCE FOR 4320/MAC/WH/ON/OIA/BENDER
DOE FOR INT'L AND POLICY (PDAS DEVITO) AND IE-141 (DEUTSCH)
OES/EGC (MIOTKE AND DEROSA)
STATE FOR EB/TPP/BTA EB/ESC/ISC (MCMANUS AND ERVITI), WHA/CAN (WHEELER)
STATE PASS FERC FOR CHAIRMAN WOOD, KEVIN KELLY AND DONALD LEKANG
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EPET ENRG ETRD CA
SUBJECT: ATLANTIC CANADA/STATEOF MAINE: ELECTRIC AND NATURAL GAS
SUPPLY AND MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
REF: A) 03 OTTAWA 1924; B) 03 OTTAWA 566; C) 03 OTTAWA 503; D) 03 HALIF
58; E) 02 OTTAWA 3205
SUMMARY/INTRODUCTION
--------------------
¶1. Several energy infrastructure projects being contemplated in
New Brunswick and Nova Scotia promise to bind Atlantic Canada
further into the northeastern U.S. gas and electric grids, with
likely benefits for New England energy consumers:
- Refurbishment of NB Power's Point Lepreau nuclear generating
station (awaiting GoNB political approval).
- Construction of a major power line from Point Lepreau to
Bangor (awaiting State of Maine approval).
- Break-up of provincially-owned NB Power into five new entities
(awaiting GoNB legislation). A long run objective among New
Brunswick energy leaders is to encourage an integrated electric
power market covering New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward
Island and much of northern Maine.
- Proposals for liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals in both
provinces (one near Saint John, New Brunswick is expected to
start construction by June).
- Either LNG terminal, if completed, would require expansion of
the Maritimes and Northeast Pipeline (M&NE -- which runs from
offshore Nova Scotia through New England) to approximately twice
its current capacity.
¶2. Mission ECON staff paid calls on several government and
industry players in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia during late
January. This report, which is based on those conversations, is
a joint effort of Amconsul Halifax and Amembassy Ottawa.
END SUMMARY/INTRODUCTION
ELECTRIC POWER
--------------
¶3. Northern Maine's power grid is closely integrated with that
of Atlantic Canada. Bangor Hydro is controlled by Halifax-based
Emera, the dominant power firm in Nova Scotia. NB Power
officials say that the grids in two Maine counties - Aroostook
and Washington - are in effect "part of the New Brunswick grid."
In 2003, NB Power exported roughly 2 terawatt-hours of electric
power to Maine (net of imports). Given recent declines in net
power exports from the rest of Canada, NB Power now accounts for
around 30 percent of Canada's net power exports to the United
States. NB Power has also historically supplied virtually all
of the power needs of neighboring Prince Edward Island.
¶4. In New Brunswick, the electric power industry is dominated
by provincial government-owned NB Power. NB Power has a mix of
hydroelectric and fossil-fuel generation plus a single-reactor
nuclear plant at Point Lepreau, about 30 miles from Calais,
Maine. A decision is required soon on whether to replace,
refurbish, or decommission the 22-year-old reactor.
¶5. New Brunswick's options for additional generation are
limited. Despite the presence of the M&NE pipeline (see below),
natural gas is not currently available in New Brunswick at
prices which would make it economic for power generation. Few
undeveloped hydroelectric sites are available. The remaining
options - burning imported coal or oil - are relatively
polluting and carbon-emitting. They are thus likely to conflict
with the Government of Canada's commitment to implement the
Kyoto Protocol. Industry representatives await clarification of
this policy, which will probably take several more months -
meanwhile, they summarize this problem in the words "regulatory
risk".
¶6. REACTOR RENEWAL: Provincial government energy officials and
NB Power executives are currently hanging on a GoNB decision on
the future of the Point Lepreau nuclear plant. Regulatory
approvals are already in place for refurbishment, but the
financial cost would be high to purchase large amounts of
replacement power while 380 fuel channels in the reactor core
are replaced and the turbines and generator are reconditioned.
¶7. In 2002, citing "no significant economic advantage" from
refurbishing, provincial regulators recommended against it.
However, Department of Energy officials believe the arguments in
favor of refurbishment have strengthened since then, as the
price outlook for natural gas (the main alternative) is now even
higher. Moreover, they say the regulators did not consider the
value of refurbishment in avoiding future greenhouse gas
emissions, particularly vis-`-vis coal, which is the lowest-cost
option. Finally, the nuclear option has the added attractions -
particularly for a relatively low-income, high-unemployment
province - of being both high-technology and relatively
labor-intensive.
¶8. Whether or not the GoNB decides to refurbish Point Lepreau,
building a second reactor at that site is also a possibility.
Without outside financing, this would be even more costly than
refurbishment. The GoNB is exploring the potential for private
sector participation in either option, and/or for Point Lepreau
to be a "demonstration site" for the latest reactor design
offered by Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL). The latter
idea is based on hopes that AECL would foot most of the bill -
but AECL in turn awaits a decision from the GOC, its sole
shareholder, on options for AECL's future access to financing.
¶9. TRANSMISSION LINE TO BANGOR: Whatever happens at Point
Lepreau, NB Power also hopes to proceed with construction of a
transmission line from the Lepreau area to the vicinity of
Bangor, Maine (where the receiving utility, Bangor Hydro, is
owned by Nova Scotia's Emera Inc). This line could be completed
by 2007 and would carry power in either direction depending on
seasonal and other requirements. NB Power officials say that
all approvals still needed are on the U.S. side, and are
environment-related: some Maine stakeholders continue to demand
that the line to follow an existing (but longer) corridor
farther inland, which would be less economic.
¶10. ELECTRICITY MARKET DEVELOPMENT: Atlantic Canada and Maine
are lightly populated and their electric demand is strongly
winter-peaking. New Brunswick energy officials expect this
entire region to have a significant power scarcity problem by
the winter of 2007-08 due to the shutdown of aging generating
assets before new plants are built. Gains in both cost and
reliability can be expected from integrating the regional grid
and facilitating power trade with the rest of the U.S.
Northeast, and this makes up much of New Brunswick's current
strategy for addressing the scarcity problem. They add that it
has the potential to greatly reduce the vulnerability of
northern Maine to power outages. (While neighboring Quebec is a
major exporter of electricity from hydroelectric dams, it has
few interconnections with New Brunswick and virtually none with
Maine - and these small markets are a very long way from
Quebec's reservoirs).
¶11. As of April 1, 2004, NB Power will be split into five new
corporate entities (generating, transmission, distribution,
nuclear, and a holding/services company) plus an Independent
System Operator (ISO). NB energy officials told us that, while
they use U.S. FERC requirements to justify this publicly, they
are really planning for the anticipated power scarcity in
2007-2008 - when the new structure will allow them to invite
proposals from independent power producers. They also hope to
share experience/models with counterparts in Nova Scotia, which
plans to initiate a wholesale power market in 2005. NB
officials admit that a really integrated regional power market
in Atlantic Canada will take "another generation," and that for
the current decade, they are working toward "seamless" clearing
of power trades between the provinces' still-separate power
grids.
NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION
------------------------
¶12. Nova Scotia's offshore Sable Island energy project began
producing natural gas in early 2000. Most of this gas is
transmitted to New England via the Maritimes and Northeast
Pipeline (MNE), which also has lateral lines serving industries
near the Strait of Canso plus the urban areas of Halifax,
Moncton and Saint John. For more on the prospects for
production of oil and gas from Atlantic Canada's continental
shelf, see refs D and E and other reporting from Halifax.
¶13. The terms on which New Brunswick and Nova Scotia
communities and industries can access this gas has been a
sensitive political issue. Energy exports into the United
States are licensed by Canada's National Energy Board (NEB),
which generally defers to market forces. In order to buy gas
from the MNE pipeline, Atlantic Canadians must pay prices which
are tied to short-term markets in the Boston area (minus the
additional cost of transportation to Boston). New Brunswick
interests have two complaints about this system. First, they
argue that the Boston-based prices are in some sense "excessive"
(presumably, this means, higher than they would be if most or
all of this gas were piped to markets in eastern Canada - which
was one of the options before MNE was built). Second, they
complain that that it has become impossible to purchase MNE gas
on secure, long-term contracts - which is a prerequisite for New
Brunswick's industrial needs, and particularly for electric
power generation.
¶14. In 2001-2002 the GoNB raised this issue formally with the
NEB, which declined to take action, other than agreeing to
"monitor" the gas transmission situation in New Brunswick. GoNB
officials remain unapologetic about having raised the issue,
stressing that it is not a matter of "Canada first" (as their
position was sometimes characterized in the media) but rather
"Canada too." They say they are no longer pressing the issue
because at current prices, natural gas is simply not a viable
option for industrial uses or electric power generation in New
Brunswick. One event that might change this, they said, would
be the construction of a liquefied natural gas terminal in
Atlantic Canada.
¶15. LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS: Like other parts of North America,
Atlantic Canada is hearing proposals to construct terminals
which would receive liquefied natural gas (LNG) from pressurized
tanker ships and distribute it on the continental pipeline
network. Currently, there are two proposals:
-- Access Northeast Energy Inc. (ane-inc.com), an infrastructure
development firm, proposes to build an LNG terminal ("Bear
Head") in an established heavy-industrial zone near Point Tupper
on the Strait of Canso between mainland Nova Scotia and Cape
Breton Island. This site has very good natural features and the
project enjoys local political support. The proponent submitted
environmental applications in 2003.
-- Irving Oil Ltd. (irvingoilco.com), part of a family-owned
industrial conglomerate which is currently a large buyer/shipper
of gas on the MNE pipeline, proposes to build an LNG terminal on
the Bay of Fundy about 5 miles east of Saint John, New
Brunswick. While this project is said to be less favored by
geography (and local politics) than Bear Head, the proponent's
industrial and financial autonomy may allow it to move ahead
quickly, perhaps in an effort to pre-empt its competitor.
Irving Oil says it plans to begin construction during 2004.
¶16. Either of these projects would require at least a doubling
in size of the MNE pipeline, and either one would require the
negotiation of gas supply contracts on a long-term basis in
order to secure financing for both port and pipeline. MNE
representatives say that either project could fit well with
their plans.
¶17. New Brunswick energy officials told us that they are open
to either LNG project, provided New Brunswick buyers obtain
adequate access to the gas. They expect either project to
revive natural gas as a fuel option for industrial development
in New Brunswick.
CONCLUSION/COMMENT
------------------
¶18. An array of interesting new energy infrastructure projects
are on the horizon for Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, all of
which have the potential to significantly benefit neighboring
U.S. states. However, we also see the potential for great
frustration, discord, and disappointment. The key reason is
that optimism has consistently run ahead of reality in Atlantic
Canadian energy developments. This is painfully evident in Nova
Scotia's offshore industry, which, thirty years after the first
resource discoveries, still struggles to deliver on popular
expectations - particularly with respect to royalty flows. Part
of the problem is the multi-agency, multi-jurisdictional
complexity of offshore regulation in Canada, which makes this
one of the world's highest-cost areas of active exploration.
¶19. With respect to LNG ports and natural gas transmission,
there is little doubt that further development of such
infrastructure - if it occurs - would heat up a simmering debate
about local industries' access to natural gas. In Nova Scotia,
this issue is moderated by the provincial government's closeness
to the needs of gas producers, and by the benefit of jobs
created by gas exploration and production. New Brunswickers,
without such offsetting gains, are likely to be irritated by
news that increasing volumes of gas would transit their province
en route to New England markets.
¶20. In electric power, there could be difficult years ahead.
If New Brunswick cannot or will not finance the refurbishment of
the Point Lepreau reactor, the prospects for power generation in
that province will be bleak. The province could then be on a
collision course with the GOC's climate change policy - and
decisions on new fossil-fuelled generating plant will likely be
slowed and clouded. The results will affect residents of Maine
for the rest of this decade.
HILL