

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 10ASTANA60, KAZAKHSTAN: BEHIND THE SCENES OF KARACHAGANAK AND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10ASTANA60.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
10ASTANA60 | 2010-01-22 09:09 | 2011-04-22 09:09 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Astana |
VZCZCXRO5031
OO RUEHIK
DE RUEHTA #0060/01 0220931
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 220931Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY ASTANA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7241
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE 2381
RUCNCLS/ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 1743
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 2449
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 1359
RHMFISS/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFAAA/DIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC 1939
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC 1789
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
RHMFIUU/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RUEHAST/AMCONSUL ALMATY 2205
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 ASTANA 000060
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR SCA/CEN, EEB/ESC, S/EEE, S/CIEA
STATE PLEASE PASS TO USTDA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL ECON EINV EPET SOCI RS KZ
SUBJECT: KAZAKHSTAN: BEHIND THE SCENES OF KARACHAGANAK AND
KASHAGAN
REF: (A) 08 ASTANA 2449
(B) 08 ASTANA 1646
(C) 09 ASTANA 0041
(D) 09 ASTANA 0352
ASTANA 00000060 001.3 OF 004
¶1. (U) Sensitive but unclassified. Not for public Internet.
¶2. (SBU) SUMMARY: For more than 90 minutes on January 20, Maksat
Idenov, First Vice President of national oil company KazMunaiGas
(KMG), briefed the Ambassador on the ongoing dispute between
shareholders in the Karachaganak Petroleum Operating Company (KPO)
and KMG. In September 2009, KPO filed a claim at an international
arbitration court in Stockholm for $1.4 billion for reimbursement of
crude export duty payments. Speaking without notes -- but with
passion and conviction -- Idenov argued the government's case that
KPO has not provided sufficient justification or supporting
documentation for major expenditures since 2003. He said the
government has filed a counter-claim for $3 billion. Unable to
reach agreement at the level of corporate senior executive vice
president, Idenov stated that the parties have begun talks at the
level of corporate CEO. The case is scheduled to go to arbitration
on March 21. Idenov also summarized budget negotiations for the
massive, $150 billion Kashagan oil-exploration project. In both
cases, Idenov underlined that he only is asking international
companies to follow fundamental principles of good business
management. END SUMMARY.
BACKGROUND ON KARACHAGANAK
¶3. (U) KPO comprises Britain's BG Group (32.5%), Italy's ENI
(32.5%), Chevron (20%), and Russia's Lukoil (15%). One of the
largest oil and gas condensate fields in the world, with reserves
estimated at 1.2 billion tons of oil and 1.34 trillion cubic meters
of gas, it is the only significant oil exploration project in
Kazakhstan in which KMG does not have an equity stake (ref A).
¶4. (U) On September 18, 2009, Bloomberg reported that BG Group, as
the lead operator, initiated arbitration proceedings to seek
reimbursement of $1 billion for oil export customs duty payments
made from June 2008-January 26, 2009, when the government lowered
the crude export duty to zero (ref B). On December 29, 2009, Prime
Minister Karim Masimov told reporters that Kazakhstan wants to join
the Karachaganak project as an equity partner, reportedly with a 10%
stake. (NOTE: According to Idenov, the consortium claims $1.4
billion while the government had filed a counter-claim for more than
$3 billion. When asked to comment on reports that KMG has requested
10% of KPO, Idenov confirmed Masimov's statement, but concluded,
"You never know how an arbitration case will play out." END NOTE).
IDENOV IN THE LEAD
¶5. (SBU) Contrary to reports from ExxonMobil, which is not a member
of the KPO consortium, Idenov has retained the Karachangank
portfolio and is the government's lead negotiator on the dispute
(ref C). He told the Ambassador that he met in London on January 11
with executive vice presidents from the KPO shareholders, but they
were unable to reach an accord. As a result, Idenov said he will
appeal to the companies' CEOs in an attempt to resolve the dispute.
He implied that both sides are working in good faith to reach a
negotiated settlement before the case goes to an international
arbitration court in Stockholm on March 21.
SHOW ME THE RECEIPTS
¶6. (SBU) Idenov told the Ambassador that KPO has submitted requests
for reimbursement of hundreds of millions of dollars in expenses
from 2003-2008, without proper justification or supporting
documentation. Launching into his brief, he jumped to a white board
and began to make his case in graphic detail without the aid of
notes. According to Idenov, KMG retained the audit firm KPMG to
ASTANA 00000060 002.3 OF 004
review KPO's 2003-2006 statements and discovered that KMG reimbursed
KPO for $697 million during that period, without proper supporting
documentation. He also asserted that the audit firm Ernst and Young
reviewed KPO's statements from 2007-2008 and could not justify $347
million in expenses. Idenov told the Ambassador that when he
presented this information to KPO executives, they replied, "All
right, Maksat, we'll write you a check for that amount and just
recover those costs later." Idenov said he refused to do business
that way, and would pursue the matter further.
HIGH STAKES
¶7. (SBU) Idenov described in detail several situations dating to
2002, where -- in his opinion -- KPO management made unwise
decisions that cost KPO's shareholders dearly. (NOTE: Although KMG
does not own equity in KPO, Idenov considers KMG, as the authorized
agent of the Republic of Kazakhstan, a shareholder in the project.
END NOTE.)
-- In 2002, he said that President Nazarbayev attended the
inauguration of a major new gas processing plant. "There was a red
ribbon and big scissors, and smiles all around," he described. One
week later, according to Idenov, a gas leak due to poor quality
welding forced the plant to shut down and evacuate employees. The
plant remained idle for one year, "and the shareholders suffered,"
Idenov concluded.
-- Also in 2002, the Atyrau-Bolshoi Shagan pipeline became plugged
by caustic soda, because KPO pumped unprocessed condensate through
the pipeline. Idenov asserted that KPO cut off the damaged segments
and rebuilt the pipeline at a cost of $600 million.
-- In 2006, KPO's "Train 4," a processing unit that separates gas
from liquids, was estimated to cost $467 million to build. Idenov
said he approved the expenditure, and then was told later that the
project cost had escalated to more than $1 billion. "I understand
that the cost of construction can increase with time," he explained
, "but give me some justification!"
-- Idenov also mentioned KPO's $192 million purchase of new pipe
racks for the project, which arrived before the cement foundation
was laid on the platform. As a result, the piperacks were stored
outside, where they were punished by the severe climate of northern
Kazakhstan, deteriorated, and were rendered useless.
-- In 2006, Idenov said he authorized KPO to spend $478 million for
the front-end engineering design (FEED) of Phase III expansion
activities. Once these funds were spent, he claimed, KPO requested
another $300 million to fund a new design concept.
-- In 2008, Idenov approved a request for $450 million to procure
high-technology material (called X-60) that would resist corrosion
by sour gas. Later that year, KPO discovered that newer technology
(called F-22) had come on the market, and requested another $480
million to acquire the new material, abandoning the previous
material.
-- In 2009, according to Idenov, KPO submitted an annual budget for
2010 of $2.1 billion. Once Idenov reviewed the details, however, he
said he could only find justificatmw)QQvc.yor executives barely escaped a similar fate. He
asserted that BG Group's Peter Drunfield circulated an eight-page
letter to Masimov and Samruk-Kazyna Deputy Chairman Timur Kulibayev,
disputing Idenov's claims and asking for their support. However,
they refused to respond, and the KPO partners declined to support
Drunfield, who subsequently left BG Group. Idenov disclosed that
ASTANA 00000060 003.3 OF 004
KMG and KPO are now deep in negotiations on these issues, and
suggested that he would elevate the discussion to the level of
corporate CEO. Idenov admitted that KMG also could provided better
project oversight, and should have demanded the documents supporting
KPO's expense claims years earlier.
FIGHTING FOR FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
¶9. (SBU) Idenov mentioned complaints by KPO member companies --
with the notable exception of Chevron -- that he is causing trouble
and making unreasonable demands. "When they ask me, 'What are you
fighting for?,' I tell them, 'Serve the shareholders honestly, and
follow five simple business principles: Quality Decisions; Quality
Health, Safety, Security and Environment; Quality Technical
Integrity; Quality Project Management; and -- most importantly --
Quality Internal Controls. This is Kazakhstan's demand to KPO!'"
(NOTE: Idenov thanked the Ambassador for his September 28, 2009,
speech on corporate responsibility to the members of the American
Chamber of Commerce. He contended that was the first time any
Western ambassador has stressed publicly the theme in Kazakhstan.
"It has made a huge difference," he said, "and will help U.S.
companies, which set a good example for others." END NOTE).
AKSAI IN WONDERLAND
¶10. (SBU) Idenov highlighted KMG's demand that KPO's senior
management staff move to Astana from London in order to provide
proper oversight and supervision. He complained about KPO's
expenditure of $482 million on salaries and overhead expenses in
2009, but just $320 million on oil and gas production services.
"It's like Alice in Wonderland," he exclaimed. "They're making
their own rules, just like the White Rabbit. You can start wherever
you want, finish wherever you want, but there is one rule:
everybody gets a prize. Everybody gets paid."
A DISSENTING VOICE
¶11. (SBU) In a private meeting on January 20, Alex Verba, chairman
of Astana Law Partners LLP, strongly disputed the government's
claims that KPO lacks supporting evidence for cost reimbursement.
An auditor, Verba was a resident advisor on cost reimbursement
issues to the Karachaganak project in Aksai from 2000-2005. He
argued that the government is trying merely to counterbalance the
legitimate claim of KPO for reimbursement of illegal crude export
duties. Verba claimed that KMG has never done a professional audit
of the cost-reimbursable claims, and that they lack the expertise to
do a proper audit. Verba also alleged that KMG has its own reasons
for not conducting a full audit. "Their people were benefitting
from these subcontracts, and other arrangements, for years," he
claimed. Verba predicted that the government would lose its
arbitration case. "They haven't won one yet," he underlined.
KASHAGAN'S 2010 BUDGET
¶12. (SBU) Having finished the litany of charges against
Karachaganak, Idenov turned to Kashagan. He highlighted the
government's significant concern about the project to hook up the
drilling islands to the onshore processing plant, which is 30%
behind schedule and well over budget. The initial tender won, he
continued, with a bid of $196 million, but current costs have
reached $443 million. The original 2010 budget for Kashagan of
$10.5 billion was reduced to $8.2 billion after careful review by
KMG (ref C), he stated. To illustrate, he told the Ambassador that
the general director of the North Caspian Operating Company (NCOC),
detailed from Total, is paying $22,000 per month for an apartment in
Astana, and that other senior corporate executives are paying
similar amounts. Idenov said he approved these expenses, but warned
the executives that the amounts were excessive.
PHASE II UNDER REVIEW
ASTANA 00000060 004.3 OF 004
¶13. (SBU) Idenov asserted that he agreed to Kashagan's Phase I
budget of $38 billion, but has asked the consortium for supporting
documentation and justification of planned expenditures. In
addition, he has not approved the request for $15 billion to fund
Kashagan's Phase II development ($3.2 billion in 2010, $5 billion in
2011, and $7 billion in 2012), "because they (Agip/ENI) are
Italians. Because they messed up (on Phase I). Because I don't
trust them. They scared all of us with their management of Phase
I," he explained. Idenov expressed his preference for Phase II to
first undergo FEED, which would enable the consortium to develop a
more accurate and realistic project plan, but the partners
protested. According to Idenov, they said, "No! Give us the $15
billion and let's go!" Idenov claimed he merely was trying to
protect them from the Financial Police, who would likely launch an
investigation into the project if large investments could not be
justified. Idenov also invited the Ambassador to send a
representative to the next Kashagan budget meeting, claiming he had
nothing to hide. He even speculated that the private-sector
partners would protest this unusual display of transparency.
IDENOV'S FUTURE
¶14. (SBU) As the meeting came to a close, Idenov indicated that he
had received job offers from Shell (where he used to be a Vice
President for Strategic Planning), Agip, and Statoil. Idenov
dismissed these offers, saying it was just a way for the companies
to remove an obstacle in their way. "I'm not going away that
easily," he asserted. "But if the gentleman on the wall
(Nazarbayev) says we shouldn't follow these five fundamental
principles, then I will know that times have changed, and I will
start to consider my options."
¶15. (SBU) COMMENT: Maksat Idenov possesses a large and lively
personality. He clearly has critics in the government -- witness
his shrinking portfolio -- and among the international oil
companies. However, it is hard to argue with his basic business
principles, and reasonable to expect that projects as complex,
costly, and critical as Karachaganak and Kashagan could be managed
more efficiently. Nevertheless, we hope that in both cases, the
parties are able to reach accommodation without resort to legal
action. END COMMENT.
HOAGLAND