

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08OTTAWA446, CANADA ANNOUNCES GREATER DETAIL ON CLIMATE POLICY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08OTTAWA446.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08OTTAWA446 | 2008-04-01 21:09 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO0537
RR RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0446/01 0922111
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 012111Z APR 08
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7605
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC
RUEAEPA/EPA WASHDC
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 OTTAWA 000446
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA, EEB AND OES
DOE FOR POLICY & INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
EPA FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
WHITE HOUSE FOR CEQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV ENRG CA
SUBJECT: CANADA ANNOUNCES GREATER DETAIL ON CLIMATE POLICY
REF: A. 07 OTTAWA 1798
¶B. 07 OTTAWA 0795
¶C. 06 OTTAWA 3182
Sensitive but Unclassified. Protect accordingly.
¶1. (SBU) Summary: On March 10 Canada's federal government
provided significant additional detail on its "Turning the
Corner" climate change plan released last year. This latest
iteration announced the government's intent to establish a
clear price signal for carbon and greater detail on plans to
establish a domestic trading scheme for GHG emissions. Draft
regulations will be developed and put out for public comment
in fall 2008. Final regulations should be approved by the
fall of 2009 and come into force on January 1, 2010. The
federal plan does not mesh evenly with current provincial
climate change approaches, likely leaving gaps and varying
standards in place across the country. End Summary.
¶2. (U) On March 10 the federal government unveiled further
details of its regulatory framework for greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions. The framework, originally announced in April 2007
(Ref B), is intended to reduce GHGs by 20 per cent below 2006
levels by 2020 and cut emissions by 60-70 per cent by 2050,
initially via emissions-intensity reduction targets and after
2025 through fixed emissions caps. If these targets are met,
Canada would produce in 2020 about 610 megatons (Mt) of
carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent GHGs, 330 megatons less than
under a business as usual scenario. The final regulations
are intended to apply to about 700 facilities in 16 key
industrial sectors, including power generation, oil and gas,
pulp and paper, iron and steel, smelting, and refining. Some
industrial facilities with emissions under 50 kilo-tons (kt)
per year of CO2 equivalent will be exempt, as will "fixed
process" facilities, whose emissions are not combustion
related. According to government calculations, the plan will
have a measurable negative economic impact, which is not
estimated to exceed 0.5 percent of Canada's projected real
GDP in any single year between 2010 and 2020.
¶3. (U) The federal government calculates that federal
measures alone will reduce GHG emissions in 2020 by
approximately 230 megatons (with 165 megatons of this
reduction attributable to measures in "Turning the Corner").
Independently, provincial and territorial governments have
already committed to targets implying a further reduction of
around 300 megatons. There is overlap with federal efforts,
but the government believes provincial and territorial
initiatives already underway will supply incremental
reductions of 40 megatons, and expects provinces and
territories to introduce additional measures yield
incremental reductions of another 35 megatons. With an added
25 megatons from the efforts of a federal-provincial-industry
clean electricity task force, the federal government believes
the targeted reductions of 330 megatons (20 percent) from
2006 levels are within reach.
New Details
-----------
¶4. (U) The additional detail announced on March 10 elaborated
on the emissions reduction targets released almost a year
ago. All covered industrial sectors (see full list in para
17) will be required to reduce their emissions intensity from
2006 levels by 18 percent by 2010, with 2 percent continuous
improvement every year after that. These intensity targets
will be applied at the facility, sector or corporate level as
determined after consultation with the affected industries,
Qdetermined after consultation with the affected industries,
and minimum thresholds for application will be set in five
sectors. For chemicals, nitrogen-based fertilizers, and
natural gas pipelines the threshold will be 50 kt CO2
equivalent per year. The threshold for the electricity
sector will be 10 MW generating capacity. For upstream oil
and gas, the targets will apply to facilities with 3 kt of
emissions per year and 10,000 barrels of oil per day.
Although the federal thresholds for upstream oil and gas are
more stringent than those announced by the province of
Alberta in its 2007 "Specified Gas Emitters Regulations," the
federal government says it is committed to a "common
threshold and reporting regime in Alberta."
¶5. (U) As announced in April 2007, "Fixed Process" emissions
will receive an exemption (technically an intensity reduction
target of 0 percent), but the March 10 announcement provides
a more precise definition of fixed process emissions.
OTTAWA 00000446 002 OF 004
Greenhouse gas emissions from a "fixed process" are a direct
result of the production process, not a result of combustion
or from the processing of crude oil or natural gas. Fixed
processes account for about 60 percent of GHG emissions from
the iron and steel sector and the cement sector, 50 percent
from the aluminum sector, 40 percent from the fertilizer
sector, and smaller shares in other sectors. The non-fixed
process portion of GHG emissions in all regulated industrial
sectors will be subject required emission reductions.
¶6. (U) The most significant modification in the March 10
update is that all oil sands up-graders and in-situ plants
and all coal-fired electricity plants that come into
operation in 2012 or after will be required to meet stricter
emissions targets (using carbon capture and storage or its
equal in effectiveness ) or pay C$15 per ton of CO2
equivalent GHGs emitted over their limit. (The effective
"price" of a ton of excess CO2 equivalent GHG emissions is
expected to grow to about C$65 per ton by 2018-20). In order
to ensure that carbon capture and storage (CCS) is
"widespread by 2018," the plan envisions that firms will be
credited for investments in "pre-certified CCS projects" for
up to 100 percent of their regulatory obligation through
¶2017. (Comment: The devil is in the details, as Canadian
Association of Petroleum Producers president Pierre Alvarez
pointed out. "We'll have to figure out what it means" since
the plan remains "thin on detail" with no specifics on which
carbon capture and storage projects might qualify. End
comment).
¶7. (U) This CCS approach does mesh well with the call in
January 2008 by the joint Canada-Alberta Carbon Capture and
Storage Task Force for the immediate creation of a C$2
billion government fund to kick-start development of carbon
capture and storage projects in Canada. So far, Alberta has
committed "up to" C$500 million, while the federal budget of
February 2008 pledged C$250 million. However, almost all of
this federal money is for a zero-emissions coal-fired power
plant in Saskatchewan.
¶8. (U) The March 10 release also provided additional
information on the availability of Clean Development
Mechanism (CDM) and domestic offsets. Firms may use credits
from the Kyoto Protocol's CDM for up to 10 percent of their
regulatory obligation. The domestic offset system will be
administered by Environment Canada. Domestic offset projects
must take place in Canada and achieve reductions in one or
more of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide,
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), or sulfur
hexafluoride. Each offset credit will represent one ton of
carbon dioxide equivalent. The plan notes that consideration
will be given to recognizing reductions originating in the
U.S., "once the United States has a regulatory system in
place," and goes on to state that a good example of emissions
that could be covered by such an arrangement are those stored
by the Weyburn-Midale CCS project. The government expects to
publish detailed guidance for project proponents and
verification bodies this spring and summer, and Environment
Canada will begin reviewing project applications in the
autumn.
¶9. (U) The announcement further defined "Credits for Early
Action." Firms that took verified early action to reduce
emissions between 1992 and 2006 will be eligible for a total
Qemissions between 1992 and 2006 will be eligible for a total
of 15 Mt in credits (5 Mt per year in 2010, 2011 and 2012).
These credits will be bankable and tradable. The government
is seeking feedback until May 18, 2008, on the proposed
eligibility and allocation rules for the credits.
Establishing a Carbon Price Signal
----------------------------------
¶10. (U) In early January 2008, in response to a government
request for advice on reducing GHG emissions over the longer
term, Canada's arms-length advisory body, the National
Roundtable on the Environment and Economy (NRTEE),
recommended the federal government "implement a strong,
clear, consistent and certain GHG emission price signal
across the entire Canadian economy as soon as possible in
order to successfully shift Canada to a lower GHG emissions
pathway" and institute an "emission tax or a cap-and-trade
system or a combination of the two." This newest iteration
of the "Turning the Corner" plan emphasizes the government's
intent to take up the NRTEE recommendation and establish "a
market price for carbon."
OTTAWA 00000446 003 OF 004
¶11. (U) Under the Regulatory Framework, firms are offered
several different options to meet their emissions intensity
targets: they may undertake in-house abatement, or they may
contribute to the new government-managed "Technology Fund,"
acquire emission credits from other domestic regulated
industries, purchase offset credits from domestic sources
outside of regulated sectors, or use CDM. In the
government's economic modeling, the lowest cost option, the
Technology Fund's contribution rate of C$15 per ton CO2
equivalent in 2010-12, has the effect of moderating the price
in the early years of the regime; the cost of contributions
to the Technology Fund then rises to C$20 per ton in 2013 and
beyond, but at the same time the maximum allowable Fund
contributions decline from 70 percent of a firm's regulatory
obligation in 2010 to zero by 2018. Receipts into the Fund
will be invested in qualifying GHG emissions reductions
technology projects.
¶12. (U) This structure, coupled with the required emissions
intensity improvements rate of 2 per cent per year after
2010, means the carbon price signaled by the overall
framework to industry increases steadily. As a result, by
about 2015, the Fund is beginning to play a marginal role in
setting that price signal for industrial reductions, and it
is instead the market price of emissions (i.e., what it costs
firms to achieve actual reductions) that drives the selection
of compliance options in the model. By 2018, firms will be
responding to carbon (CO2 equivalent) prices expected to be
in the range of C$65 per ton. The government anticipates
that at this price in-house reductions and purchase of
offsets from outside the regulated sectors will be
cost-competitive options. (Note: Although the government has
yet to fully address how it will enforce compliance, we note
the Minister of the Environment has certain administrative
authorities granted by the Canadian Environmental Protection
Act (1999) that may be applied. End note.)
Market Balkanization?
---------------------
¶13. (SBU) Through the domestic offsets mechanism noted
earlier, the plan "takes the first step to set up a carbon
emissions trading market," the second key NRTEE
recommendation. However, as the federal government moves
forward with plans to create a trading system for greenhouse
gas emissions, significant hurdles remain. For example, the
federal plan anticipates a market for emissions credits
across Canada, irrespective of provincial boundaries, but
Alberta insists companies in Alberta can only purchase
offsets to meet their emissions targets from suppliers in
that province. As Alberta Premier Stelmach noted, "We're
not....looking at an interregional transfer of wealth."
Meanwhile Manitoba and British Columbia are collaborating in
developing a regional emissions markets with a number of
American states in the Western Climate Initiative. Quebec
and Ontario are observers in, and eventually want to join,
the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) of northeastern
and mid-Atlantic states. "Turning the Corner" notes that
Canada would consider recognizing reductions originating in
the United States if the U.S. establishes a comparable
regulatory system.
Just Another Step in a Long Process
-----------------------------------
¶14. (U) This version of the regulatory framework is but
another step in this government's iterative process to
Qanother step in this government's iterative process to
develop a workable climate change policy that began in
October 2006 with Bill C-30 and the affiliated "Notice of
Intent in Regulate" (Ref C), followed by the unveiling of the
original Turning the Corner plan in April 2007 (Ref B). The
government has also announced a grab bag of federal grants
and policy initiatives across the climate change spectrum
(Ref A). We understand, however, that this edition of the
framework is the final post-consultation version with
validated targets and measures, and will be translated into
regulatory language. Draft regulations are expected to be
published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, for public comment
in the fall of 2008. The final regulations are expected to
be approved and published in the Canada Gazette, Part II, in
the fall of 2009 and come into force on January 1, 2010.
¶15. (U) The April 2007 Turning the Corner plan covered other
air pollutants (SOx, NOx, and volatile organic compounds) as
well as greenhouse gases. The government anticipates adding
OTTAWA 00000446 004 OF 004
the air pollutant regulatory elements to the draft
regulations for publication in the Canada Gazette, Part I,
this fall.
Comment
-------
¶16. (SBU) Effective climate policy in Canada still faces a
number of conceptual and practical hurdles, and the prospect
of federal -- and provincial -- regulation introducing
serious unintended consequences is very real. The keystone
of the government's plan is a technology solution (carbon
capture and storage) whose effectiveness on a large scale has
not yet been demonstrated. Key CCS parameters are
ill-defined, including the list of "pre-certified CCS"
projects that can be used to offset emissions. And the
development of a GHG emissions trading market is proceeding
piece meal across the country. Coherent solutions to these
challenges will have to be addressed in the next step in the
process, the draft regulations to be published in the autumn
of 2008, for this plan to continue turning the corner on
climate change. End Comment.
¶17. (U) The regulatory framework for industrial greenhouse
gas emissions will apply to the following sectors: 1) oil
sands, 2) electricity, 3) petroleum refining, 4) chemicals,
5) fertilizers, 6) upstream oil and gas, 7) natural gas
pipelines, 8) potash, 9) iron ore pelletizing, 10) lime, 11)
iron and steel, 12) titanium, 13) pulp and paper, 14)
aluminum and alumina, 15) cement, and 16) base metal smelting.
Visit Canada,s Economy and Environment Forum at
http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/can ada
WILKINS