

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AE
AF
AM
AR
AJ
AU
AORC
AG
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AGMT
AL
AFIN
AO
AMED
ADCO
AS
ABUD
ABLD
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APECO
AID
AND
AMBASSADOR
AN
ARM
AY
AODE
AMG
ASCH
AMCHAMS
ARF
APCS
APEC
ASEAN
AGAO
ANET
ADPM
ACOA
ACABQ
AORL
AFFAIRS
ATRN
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ADANA
ASIG
AA
AX
AUC
AC
AECL
AADP
AGRICULTURE
AMEX
ACAO
ACBAQ
AQ
AORG
ADM
AINF
AIT
ASEX
AGR
AROC
ATFN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AZ
AVERY
BA
BY
BU
BR
BE
BL
BO
BK
BM
BILAT
BH
BEXP
BF
BTIO
BC
BBSR
BMGT
BTIU
BG
BWC
BB
BD
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BN
BIDEN
BT
CW
CH
CF
CD
CV
CVIS
CM
CE
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CIA
CU
CASC
CI
CO
CACM
CDB
CN
CMGT
CS
CG
CBW
CIS
CR
CONDOLEEZZA
CPAS
CAN
CWC
CY
COUNTER
CDG
CL
CT
CIC
CIDA
CSW
CHR
CB
CODEL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CTR
COM
CICTE
CFED
CJUS
CKGR
CBSA
CEUDA
CARSON
CONS
CITEL
CLMT
CROS
CITT
CAC
CVR
CDC
CAPC
COPUOS
CBC
CBE
CARICOM
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CTM
CNARC
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EUN
EFIS
EG
ETTC
EZ
EPET
EAID
EAGR
ENRG
ECUN
EU
ELAB
ECPS
EAIR
EINV
ELTN
EWWT
EIND
EMIN
EI
ECIN
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
EN
ES
ER
EC
EUC
EINT
EINVETC
ENGR
ET
EK
ENIV
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ECONOMY
EAP
EFTA
EUR
EUMEM
EXIM
ERD
ENERG
EUREM
ESA
ERNG
EXTERNAL
EPA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ECONOMICS
ELN
EINN
EFINECONCS
ENNP
EEPET
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ETRO
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ECONOMIC
EAIDS
EDU
ETRA
ETRN
EFIM
EIAR
ETRC
EAIG
EXBS
EURN
ECIP
EREL
ECA
ENGY
ECONCS
ECONEFIN
ETC
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINDETRD
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
INRB
IRAJ
IQ
IN
IT
IMO
INTERPOL
ICAO
IO
IC
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ICTY
ID
IPR
IWC
ILC
INTELSAT
IL
IBRD
IMF
IA
IRC
ICRC
ILO
ITU
ITRA
IV
IDA
IAHRC
ICJ
ISRAELI
IRS
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
IZPREL
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITF
IBET
IEFIN
INR
IACI
INTERNAL
IDP
IGAD
IEA
ICTR
IIP
INRA
INRO
IF
KJUS
KSCA
KNNP
KU
KCOR
KCRM
KDEM
KTFN
KHLS
KPAL
KWBG
KACT
KGHG
KPAO
KTIA
KIRF
KWMN
KS
KG
KZ
KN
KMDR
KISL
KSPR
KHIV
KPRP
KAWK
KR
KUNR
KDRG
KCIP
KGCC
KTIP
KSUM
KPKO
KVIR
KAWC
KPIN
KGIC
KRAD
KIPR
KOLY
KCFE
KMCA
KE
KV
KICC
KNPP
KBCT
KSEP
KFRD
KFLU
KVPR
KOCI
KBIO
KSTH
KMPI
KCRS
KOMC
KTBT
KPLS
KIRC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLO
KBTS
KSTC
KTDB
KFSC
KX
KFTFN
KNEI
KIDE
KREC
KMRS
KICA
KPAONZ
KCGC
KSAF
KRGY
KCMR
KRVC
KVRP
KSEO
KCOM
KAID
KTEX
KNUC
KNAR
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KLIG
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KHDP
KGIT
KNSD
KOMS
KWMM
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KO
KMFO
KRCM
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KPWR
KID
KWNM
KRIM
KPOA
KCHG
KOM
KSCI
KFIN
KMOC
KESS
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KTER
KDDG
KPAK
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KCFC
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KJUST
MARR
MOPS
MU
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MASS
MCAP
MOPPS
MAR
MPOS
MO
ML
MR
MASC
MX
MD
MP
MA
MTRE
MIL
MCC
MZ
MK
MDC
MRCRE
MAPS
MV
MI
MEPN
MAPP
MEETINGS
MAS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTCR
MG
MC
MARAD
MIK
MILITARY
MEDIA
MEPI
MUCN
MEPP
MT
MERCOSUR
MW
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
NZ
NATO
NG
NI
NO
NATIONAL
NU
NPT
NIPP
NL
NPG
NS
NA
NGO
NP
NSG
NDP
NAFTA
NR
NC
NH
NE
NSF
NPA
NK
NSSP
NRR
NATOPREL
NSC
NT
NW
NORAD
NEW
NV
NSFO
NAR
NASA
NZUS
OTRA
OVIP
OPRC
OPDC
OSCE
OAS
ODIP
OIIP
OFDP
OVP
OREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OIC
OFDA
OSCI
OPIC
OBSP
OECD
ON
OCII
OHUM
OES
OCS
OMIG
OPAD
OTR
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PSOE
PINS
PARM
PK
PBTS
PEPR
PM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PREF
PBIO
PROP
PA
PSI
PINT
PO
PKFK
PL
PAK
PE
POLITICS
PINL
POL
PHSA
PU
PF
POV
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PARMS
PRGOV
PNAT
POLINT
PRAM
PMAR
PG
PAO
PROG
PRELP
PPA
PCUL
PSEPC
PSA
PREO
PAHO
PGIV
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POSTS
PTBS
PGOVLO
PORG
PGOVE
PLN
PINF
PAS
PUNE
POLICY
PDEM
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PHUMPGOV
PMIL
PNG
PP
PS
PHUH
PECON
POGOV
PY
PHUMPREL
PHUS
PRL
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PEL
RS
RU
RW
REGION
RP
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RUPREL
RM
RO
RCMP
RSO
RELATIONS
REACTION
REPORT
RIGHTS
ROOD
RF
RFE
RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP
SA
SY
SF
SYR
SENV
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SO
SU
SG
STEINBERG
SHUM
SW
SMIG
SR
SZ
SIPRS
SI
SAARC
SPCE
SARS
SN
SYRIA
SANC
SL
SCRS
SC
SENVKGHG
SAN
SNARCS
SHI
SWE
SNARIZ
SIPDIS
SEN
SNARN
SPCVIS
SEVN
SSA
SH
SOFA
SK
ST
TPHY
TU
TRGY
TI
TX
TS
TW
TC
TFIN
TD
TSPA
TH
TT
TIP
TBIO
TSPL
TZ
TERRORISM
TRSY
TN
THPY
TINT
TF
TL
TV
TK
TO
TP
TURKEY
TNGD
TBID
TAGS
TR
UP
US
UNSC
UK
UZ
UE
UNESCO
UV
UNGA
UN
UNMIK
UNO
UY
UAE
UNEP
UG
UNHCR
UNHRC
USUN
UNAUS
USTR
USNC
USOAS
UNCHR
UNCSD
UNDP
USEU
USPS
UNDC
UNDESCO
UNCHC
UNFICYP
UNC
UNODC
UNPUOS
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCHS
UNVIE
USAID
UNIDROIT
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05QUITO710, ECUADOR'S WHITE GOODS POLICIES
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05QUITO710.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05QUITO710 | 2005-03-31 20:08 | 2011-05-02 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Quito |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 QUITO 000710
SIPDIS
DEPT PASS TO USTR BENNETT HARMAN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD EINV ECON EC
SUBJECT: ECUADOR'S WHITE GOODS POLICIES
REF: STATE 30500
¶1. Summary. In response to reftel, Emboffs met with newly
appointed Vice Minister of Industries in the Ministry of
Trade (MICIP) Jorge Illingworth and Ecuadorian Standards
Institute (INEN) Director General Felipe Urresta to discuss
white goods. Urresta had not, as he had offered to USTR,
presented his proposal to the Special Committee to suspend
the current practice that had prevented entry of certain
US-produced white goods into Ecuador. Though he had on two
occasions received copies of the US white paper on Ecuador
standards and our request to provide a written response, he
has not provided us with one. He did provide an oral
response and requested a meeting with USTR and Embassy
officials prior to the April 18-22 Lima round of FTA
negotiations. Though the GOE claims it complies with its WTO
commitments regarding technical trade barriers, its
interpretation of compliance leaves plenty of room for doubt.
End Summary.
White Paper Comments
--------------------
¶2. Commercial and Econ officers recently met with newly
appointed Vice Minister of Industries in the Ministry of
Foreign Trade (MICIP) Jorge Illingworth and President of the
Ecuadorian Standards Institute (INEN) Felipe Urresta to
discuss the USG white paper provided in reftel. Urresta
confirmed that he had received copies of the white paper from
USTR and the Embassy on two separate occasions. He had not
provided a copy of the white paper to the &Special
Committee8 referred to by Urresta and the white paper, which
is the Comite Interinstitucional de Normalizacion, or
Inter-institutional Standards Committee (CIN by its Spanish
initials), but said he had discussed the salient points of
the white paper with CIN.
¶3. Illingworth and Urresta said that the trade statistics
they reviewed (from manifestos.com) do not indicate a
significant drop in US white goods entering Ecuador. They
said instead that the statistics indicated imports of white
goods from other countries (especially Brazil, Italy and
Colombia) were growing more rapidly than imports from the
USA. Urresta also asserted that there is nothing new in
Ecuador,s procedures regarding white goods, claiming that
the GOE is simply implementing its 1998 standards law.
¶4. According to Urresta, neither the INEN nor MICIP have ever
rejected Underwriter Laboratories (UL) certifications.
Urresta also claims that the GOE need not, under the WTO
Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, notify the WTO if the
GOE is applying internationally recognized standards and
processes, as is the case with white goods. He denied that
the GOE was requiring new INEN-1 compliance certificates for
superficial changes to white goods (e.g., new colors).
Urresta Takes No Action on His Offer to USTR
--------------------------------------------
¶5. Urresta had also not discussed with CIN the offer that he
had made to USTR,s Suzanne Troje last October. We again
reviewed the content of that offer for Illingworth,s
benefit. First, INEN would repeal the regulations and
instructivos (described by Urresta as mandatory instructions
designed to eliminate discretion when implementing
regulations) that have prevented some US white goods from
entering Ecuador. Second, the GOE would issue a formal
notification of new regulations with a 90-day period to
receive comments on the proposed regulations. Third, the GOE
would arrange a transparent review of the comments received
in response to the notice. Finally, the GOE would publish
the new regulation, allowing six months for implementation
before it took full effect. Urresta said he was willing to
bring the proposal to CIN, but later offered an alternative
to unblock the entry of US-made refrigerator freezers. He
said the CIN could approve a modification to the regulations
that would allow US origin refrigerators and freezers to
enter Ecuador upon presentation of a UL 250 compliance
certificate, a certificate of &tropicalization8, and a
certification that the equipment does not use CFCs. Urresta
suggested that USTR and Embassy officials meet in Quito prior
to the April 14-18 Lima FTA negotiations round.
Organizational Structure
------------------------
¶6. The CIN and various technical committees are the principal
bodies involved in standards and compliance policy.
Established in 1998 by Executive Decree 1536, the CIN is
responsible for publishing the list of goods that must comply
with Ecuadorian norms and technical registrations. The
CIN,s duties include adding or removing products from the
list of those that must comply with Ecuadorian regulations,
recommending guidelines for the correct application of this
law, recommending processes to harmonize national standards
with international ones, and any other activity related to
the contents of this decree.
¶7. The CIN published the first list of products subject to
norms and technical regulations in 1999, with subsequent
modifications in 2000, 2002 and 2003. In January 2003, by
Executive Decree 3497, the GOE introduced the INEN-1
certificate, which certifies that a product complies with
Ecuadorian technical regulations. The INEN-1 is valid for
one year. The list of products was last modified in August
2003 by Acuerdo Interministerial 03420 (Registro Oficial 158)
to include new types of gas ranges and refrigerators.
¶8. Executive Decree 3497 also defined who would serve on the
CIN: the vice ministers of Industry and Foreign Trade of
MICIP, one representative each from the chambers of commerce,
industries and small industries and the Director General of
INEN (currently Urresta). The latter is not a voting member
of CIN, but in effect runs CIN agendas and meetings. INEN
provides technical assistance to the CIN and the technical
committees. Embassy sources indicate that INEN (through
Urresta) manages and leads much of the standards work,
leaving the CIN to rely upon INEN,s technical expertise.
¶9. The technical committees are responsible for formulating
new regulations, revising old ones and drafting instructivos.
The instructivos, described above, also include information
essential to a company wishing to import regulated products.
However, Urresta asserts that the TBT agreement does not
require publication of instructivos or public notices of
changes in the instructivos. Nor are the instructivos
published on the INEN website. They are also not published
in the official register but take effect immediately upon
adoption. Urresta claims that there is no need to notify the
public of instructivos because they do not change laws or
regulations, but merely implement them.
Current Process
---------------
¶10. MICIP (at the behest of INEN) initiates a new regulation
or regulatory change when the INEN sends emails to specific
stakeholders, reportedly by sending them to various chambers
of industry, informing them of a proposed regulatory change.
INEN does send out an electronic bulletin every three
months, but it covers activities that occurred in the prior
quarter. October 2004 was the last electronic bulletin
posted on the INEN website. Though the website has links for
additional information on numerous standards issues, there is
no link for technical regulation notifications.
¶11. MICIP (again through INEN) convenes technical committees
on specific topics. According to Urresta, one must be
&technically qualified8 to participate in these meetings.
For example, in one case, invitations were sent to 27
individuals from local industry, chambers of commerce and
industry, universities and other government officials. A
technical committee was formed with 11 voting members, 1
representing a foreign manufacturer, 7 representing local
manufacturers and their suppliers, and 1 each from a
technical university, the college of mechanical engineers and
MICIP. Interested parties may send comments to the technical
committee, but the committee itself decides which comments
are worthy of consideration. INEN representatives serve as
the secretariat for the technical committees, producing draft
language for review and discussion by the committees.
Urresta resisted our suggestion to open the technical
committee meetings to the public.
¶12. After six-eight months, the technical committee submits
the to INEN,s Board of Directors (the Consejo Directivo, or
CD). The CD reviews the draft and generally forwards it to
the CIN, who in turn passes it to the Minister of MICIP for
approval. On those occasions when the CD suggests changes to
the draft, it is returned to the technical committee to be
modified and is then re-submitted to the CD. The CD sends
the vetted draft through the CIN to the Minister, who signs
the new regulation.
¶13. The GOE modified its notifications procedures in 2004.
Once a regulation is adopted, the regulation is published in
the official register and reported to the WTO by the MICIP
&inquiry point of contact.8 The WTO notification includes
the address, phone number, fax and e-mail of the inquiry
point of contact, but not the incumbent,s name (currently
Arturo Barbosa of MICIP). The WTO notice does not provide
direct access to new regulations or other related documents.
¶14. Urresta said that under the WTO TBT Agreement Ecuador was
not required to state in its WTO notices where a new
regulation could be obtained. Providing a point of contact
for further inquiries was sufficient, he asserted. He also
said that only comments from other governments (not private
companies or individuals) would be accepted by the GOE during
the 60-day WTO comment period. (Note: Andean Community
countries (CAN) ) Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and
Venezuela ) by agreement have 90 days under a CAN
agreement.) Also, Urresta claims that Ecuador is not
required under the WTO TBT Agreement to notify or publish
regulations that are applying internationally recognized
standards or procedures, which he cites is the case with
white goods.
Proposed Quality Law
--------------------
¶15. Illingworth told us that Ecuador does have a proposal for
a new quality law that he helped to draft when he was Vice
President of the Guayaquil Chamber of Industries. However,
given the turmoil in the Ecuadorian Congress (a near
permanent condition, made worse over the last several
months), the new law will not be proposed to Congress in the
immediate future. (Comment: We believe it unlikely that any
serious structural reforms can be passed during the remainder
of President Gutierrez,s term in office, which expires in
January 2007. End comment.) Urresta touts a 1999 World Bank
project designed in part to restructure Ecuador,s standards,
testing and compliance agencies. However, the World Bank,
for lack of GOE progress, withdrew the funding.
Comment
-------
¶16. What is clear from our review of the Ecuadorian standards
policy and compliance mechanisms is that INEN controls most
of the process. The lack of notification to and
participation by the public means that INEN can operate as
the &technical expert8 with little to no checks and
balances, leaving considerable room for special interest
interference. Even the technical committees are stacked in
favor of local producers, thereby suggesting legitimacy to
protectionist policies. INEN has said that the WTO requires
all previous obligatory Ecuadorian technical standards to
become voluntary within three years. Therefore, Ecuador will
likely move to rewrite its technical standards as technical
regulations. In February, for the first time, Ecuador
notified two new technical regulations.
KENNEY