

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AF
AE
AR
AORC
AJ
AU
AM
ABLD
AL
AMGT
ASUP
AFIN
APER
ABUD
AVERY
APCS
AEMR
ADCO
APECO
ASIG
AG
AA
AS
AFFAIRS
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AMED
AO
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ATRN
AID
AC
AGMT
CH
CO
CS
CE
CU
CLINTON
CG
CVIS
CMGT
CI
CJAN
CF
COM
CASC
CA
CBW
CM
CDG
CR
COUNTER
CD
CWC
CKGR
CN
CPAS
CJUS
CV
CONS
CT
CY
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
ECON
EFIN
EAIR
EUN
EINV
ENRG
EG
ETRD
EPET
ETTC
ELAB
EU
ER
ET
EAGR
ECPS
ECIN
ELTN
EAID
EMIN
EWWT
EFIS
EIND
EC
ES
EN
EI
ENVR
ENGR
ENIV
EUNCH
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELN
EZ
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EINT
EUR
ECINECONCS
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EK
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IN
IC
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
IT
ICTY
IO
IA
IWC
ID
ICRC
ILC
INTELSAT
IMO
ISRAELI
IACI
ILO
ITRA
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
ICAO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
INTERPOL
IV
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KDEM
KCRM
KJUS
KTIA
KWBG
KPAL
KIPR
KTIP
KE
KNNP
KGHG
KICC
KV
KTFN
KU
KCFE
KDRG
KWMN
KSCA
KGIC
KCOR
KFRD
KPKO
KSUM
KPRP
KPAO
KBCT
KIRF
KCFC
KISL
KREC
KSPR
KHIV
KBIO
KMCA
KMPI
KFLU
KSTH
KBTR
KS
KOMC
KOMS
KSEP
KPRV
KFLO
KHLS
KN
KWWMN
KUNR
KLIG
KSTC
KZ
KG
KRAD
KOLY
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KAWK
KCIP
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KIDE
KSAF
KX
KWMNCS
KNEI
KCRS
KVPR
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KACT
KO
KFSC
KR
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MO
MX
MCAP
ML
MTCRE
MR
MP
MY
MU
MIL
MAR
MC
MRCRE
MTRE
MA
MEPI
MV
MPOS
MD
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OREP
OVIP
OFDP
ODIP
OPDC
OAS
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPRC
OVP
OSCI
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PREF
PTER
PARM
PBTS
PINR
PINS
PHSA
PK
POL
PM
PINT
PE
PINF
PEL
PA
PARMS
PO
PLN
PROP
PALESTINIAN
PAO
PL
POV
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
SENV
SY
SZ
SOCI
SO
SR
SNAR
SA
SP
SW
SMIG
SU
SCUL
SC
SAN
SN
SL
SG
SYR
SEVN
SF
SI
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TRGY
TU
TBIO
TH
TS
TSPL
TT
TPHY
TSPA
TI
TK
TIP
TERRORISM
TZ
TX
TW
TD
TP
TC
TO
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TURKEY
UK
UNGA
UN
UNHRC
UNMIK
UNO
UZ
UNSC
UP
UG
UNHCR
UNDC
US
UNAUS
USTR
UV
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UAE
USEU
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05SANJOSE1712, COSTA RICAN LABOR UNIONS LOOK FOR WAYS TO COMBAT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SANJOSE1712.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SAN JOSE 001712
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN BBOYNTON
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ELAB ETRD CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICAN LABOR UNIONS LOOK FOR WAYS TO COMBAT
CAFTA-DR
REF: A. 04 SAN JOSE 2628
¶B. SAN JOSE 1153
¶C. SAN JOSE 944
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Costa Rica's labor unions, flush from their
earlier successes in intimidating President Abel Pacheco,
recently fell back to earth when planned demonstrations
against the Central American-U.S.-Dominican Republic Free
Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) fizzled. Now, with possible
adoption and implementation of the trade agreement looming,
the somewhat-humbled unions are joining with their regional
counterparts to redefine their message and mission. While
not abandoning their vehement opposition to CAFTA-DR and free
trade agreements in general, there are some indications that
the unions are gradually coming to terms with the inevitable
adoption of multiple free trade agreements, and are shaping
their upcoming agenda to regain a legitimate, participatory
role in determining Costa Rica's free trade policy. End
Summary.
--------------------------------------------- ----------
FROM LIMELIGHT TO SEARCHLIGHT: LOOKING FOR LABOR'S ROLE
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶2. (SBU) During President Abel Pacheco's term of office, none
of his political adversaries have been more opportunistic or
more successful at intimidating the President than the
country's public sector labor unions. On numerous occasions,
Pacheco has caved in to union demands in the face of large
strikes, even in cases where courts had ruled the strikes
illegal. With each political victory, union leaders felt
their power increasing, and became bolder in their opposition
to Pacheco's policies (Reftel A). Thanks to his charismatic
leadership and constant media exposure, Albino Vargas,
president of the National Association of Public and Private
Employees (ANEP), became a minor celebrity. Thus, from the
moment of its introduction, Vargas and other union leaders
brashly denounced CAFTA-DR, contending that it would result
in high unemployment, deterioration of public services,
inflation and massive industry shifts, and would further
exacerbate perceived labor abuses.
¶3. (SBU) Despite acceptance of CAFTA-DR by the general
public, labor leaders confidently promised Pacheco that they
would muster thousands to protest should he present the
agreement to the Legislative Assembly for debate. True to
his history, and despite his initial support for the
agreement, Pacheco immediately began to waver. Afraid of
widespread strikes and mass demonstrations, Pacheco has for
the past year looked for any opportunity to postpone sending
CAFTA-DR to the legislative assembly for approval.
¶4. (SBU) In April 2005, however, labor leaders went too far
by targeting Oscar Arias, front-runner for president in next
year's elections and an ardent CAFTA-DR supporter. In their
anti-CAFTA-DR zeal, labor leaders stated that they would not
recognize an Arias victory at the polls (Reftel B). This
message did not resonate well a population proud of its
democratic traditions, and ultimately backfired. The
unionists latest attempt (in May) to flood the streets with
angry marchers failed, with small, disheartened groups that
disappeared at the first sign of rain (Reftel C). Recent
polls show a majority of Costa Ricans support CAFTA-DR, and
events have shown that those who don't support the deal have
not been able to make good on their threats to "take it to
the streets."
¶5. (SBU) With U.S. Congressional approval of CAFTA-DR and
increasing pressure on President Abel Pacheco to present the
treaty for Costa Rican legislative consideration, Costa
Rica's labor organizations are struggling to find a role to
play in the debate. While the unions have never wavered in
their opposition to CAFTA-DR, and continue to rail against it
with every opportunity, the only person who appears to be
really taking them seriously is President Pacheco. It is
difficult to say whether declining opposition to CAFTA-DR is
due to an on-going backlash at the demagoguery of certain
labor leaders, media fatigue, or to a growing understanding
of globalization and a desire not to be left behind.
Whatever the reason, as their audience dwindles, the labor
organizations are struggling to regain their hold on the
public's attention.
--------------------------------------------- ------
MISERY LOVES COMPANY: CA LABOR UNIONS MEET, REFOCUS
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶5. (SBU) Given the context in which it was convened, many
expected grand statements of solidarity to emerge from the
July 12-13 conference of Central American labor leaders,
organized by the Central American Common Labor Platform
(PSCC) and held in San Jose. However, the only sign that
such a meeting even occurred was a single article in national
daily newspaper "Prensa Libre," which detailed plans for a
Central American Labor Summit in October, with others to
follow through the end of the year. Puzzled by the lack of
public statements to emerge from the conference, Poloff
contacted Edgar Morales, deputy secretary general of ANEP.
According to Morales, the chief purpose of the July
conference was simply to lay the groundwork for the October
summit. He stated that the October meeting would include not
just regional labor leaders, but industry and political
invitees as well. While CAFTA-DR is an intended topic of
discussion, Morales stated that the principal theme will be
twenty years of unfair labor practices in all the Central
American countries. Also on the agenda are free trade
policies in general, workers' rights, and International Labor
Organization (ILO) conventions and their implementation.
¶6. (SBU) Predictably, union leaders have responded to U.S.
Congressional approval of CAFTA-DR with dismay and promises
to continue fighting the good fight. In a conversation with
Poloff, Rodrigo Aguilar, president of one of Costa Rica's
largest labor organizations, the Rerum Novarum Workers'
Confederation, expressed his hope that President Pacheco's
"Commission of Eminent Persons" will recommend against
implementation of CAFTA-DR. Aguilar believes that Pacheco
will resist pressure to send the treaty to the legislature
until after the commission has rendered a decision; Aguilar
concedes, however, that no one has yet been able to
accurately predict what Pacheco will do. According to
Aguilar, leaders of all Costa Rica's major labor
organizations will be convening on Tuesday, August 2, to
discuss strategy, and will release details to the public
sometime after August 3. Albino Vargas, head of ANEP, told
the press that regardless of Congressional approval of
CAFTA-DR, his organization would continue its fight against
the treaty. Both Vargas and Aguilar reiterated their
commitment to organize large demonstrations upon the
agreement's presentation to the Legislative Assembly.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶7. (SBU) Now that the U.S. Congress has blessed CAFTA-DR,
President Pacheco will be under increasing pressure to
present it to the Legislative Assembly. Even if Pacheco
decides not to act, the February 2006 elections will serve as
a public referendum on CAFTA-DR, in which case the unions'
successful intimidation of Pacheco could backfire on them.
Oscar Arias has already signaled his intention to fight for
adoption of CAFTA-DR, and if he wins convincingly, he will
certainly follow through with his plan to present the treaty
for legislative approval. With adoption and implementation
growing more likely, the unions have to make a decision:
continue to kick against the tide of globalization and free
trade, or work constructively with the government to have a
hand in equitable implementation.
KAPLAN