

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AF
AE
AR
AORC
AJ
AU
AM
ABLD
AL
AMGT
ASUP
AFIN
APER
ABUD
AVERY
APCS
AEMR
ADCO
APECO
ASIG
AG
AA
AS
AFFAIRS
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AMED
AO
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ATRN
AID
AC
AGMT
CH
CO
CS
CE
CU
CLINTON
CG
CVIS
CMGT
CI
CJAN
CF
COM
CASC
CA
CBW
CM
CDG
CR
COUNTER
CD
CWC
CKGR
CN
CPAS
CJUS
CV
CONS
CT
CY
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
ECON
EFIN
EAIR
EUN
EINV
ENRG
EG
ETRD
EPET
ETTC
ELAB
EU
ER
ET
EAGR
ECPS
ECIN
ELTN
EAID
EMIN
EWWT
EFIS
EIND
EC
ES
EN
EI
ENVR
ENGR
ENIV
EUNCH
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELN
EZ
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EINT
EUR
ECINECONCS
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EK
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IN
IC
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
IT
ICTY
IO
IA
IWC
ID
ICRC
ILC
INTELSAT
IMO
ISRAELI
IACI
ILO
ITRA
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
ICAO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
INTERPOL
IV
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KDEM
KCRM
KJUS
KTIA
KWBG
KPAL
KIPR
KTIP
KE
KNNP
KGHG
KICC
KV
KTFN
KU
KCFE
KDRG
KWMN
KSCA
KGIC
KCOR
KFRD
KPKO
KSUM
KPRP
KPAO
KBCT
KIRF
KCFC
KISL
KREC
KSPR
KHIV
KBIO
KMCA
KMPI
KFLU
KSTH
KBTR
KS
KOMC
KOMS
KSEP
KPRV
KFLO
KHLS
KN
KWWMN
KUNR
KLIG
KSTC
KZ
KG
KRAD
KOLY
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KAWK
KCIP
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KIDE
KSAF
KX
KWMNCS
KNEI
KCRS
KVPR
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KACT
KO
KFSC
KR
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MO
MX
MCAP
ML
MTCRE
MR
MP
MY
MU
MIL
MAR
MC
MRCRE
MTRE
MA
MEPI
MV
MPOS
MD
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OREP
OVIP
OFDP
ODIP
OPDC
OAS
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPRC
OVP
OSCI
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PREF
PTER
PARM
PBTS
PINR
PINS
PHSA
PK
POL
PM
PINT
PE
PINF
PEL
PA
PARMS
PO
PLN
PROP
PALESTINIAN
PAO
PL
POV
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
SENV
SY
SZ
SOCI
SO
SR
SNAR
SA
SP
SW
SMIG
SU
SCUL
SC
SAN
SN
SL
SG
SYR
SEVN
SF
SI
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TRGY
TU
TBIO
TH
TS
TSPL
TT
TPHY
TSPA
TI
TK
TIP
TERRORISM
TZ
TX
TW
TD
TP
TC
TO
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TURKEY
UK
UNGA
UN
UNHRC
UNMIK
UNO
UZ
UNSC
UP
UG
UNHCR
UNDC
US
UNAUS
USTR
UV
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UAE
USEU
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05SANJOSE2265, FOREIGN MINISTER TOVAR BRIEFS DIPLOMATIC CORPS ON
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SANJOSE2265.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 SAN JOSE 002265
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/29/2015
TAGS: PBTS PREL PINR ETRD CS NU
SUBJECT: FOREIGN MINISTER TOVAR BRIEFS DIPLOMATIC CORPS ON
COSTA RICA-NICARAGUA BORDER DISPUTE
REF: A. SAN JOSE 2249
¶B. SAN JOSE 2131
¶C. SAN JOSE 1746
¶D. MANAGUA 2639
Classified By: Charge Russell Frisbie for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (C) Summary: Foreign Minsiter Tovar told diplomats in San
Jose that Costa Rica had no alternative to filing a case in
the ICJ to vindicate its rights to free navigation on the San
Juan River. He said that going to the court was not a
hostile or unfriendly act and that retaliation on the part of
Nicaragua was unjustified. He said that a 35 percent tariff
being considered by Nicaragua would, if adopted, cripple the
economies of both countries, set back economic integration in
the region, violate CAFTA-DR, and undermine prospects for a
free trade agreement with the European Union. End summary.
¶2. (SBU) On September 29, Foreign Minister Tovar convoked the
entire diplomatic corps in San Jose to explain why the GOCR
decided to bring a case before the International Court of
Justice (ICJ) to vindicate Costa Rica's claim to rights of
free navigation on the San Juan River. With 30 to 35 chiefs
of mission in attendance, Tovar said that negotiations with
Nicaragua had failed and that Nicaragua had rejected Costa
Rica's proposal for arbitration. He added that Costa Rica
could not extend the existing "truce" (during which Costa
Rica cannot exercise its rights of free navigation) because,
according to legal experts in this matter, passive assent to
the status quo could constitute a forfeiture of Costa Rica's
rights. Tovar stressed that in any event Costa Rica's
availing itself of the court cannot be construed as an
unfriendly act, but rather is the way civilized nations
resolve disputes that they are unable to resolve by other
means.
¶3. (SBU) Tovar said that the GOCR is extremely concerned that
President Bolanos has ordered the Nicaraguan Army to send
reinforcements to the border and that the Nicaraguan Assembly
is considering a 35 percent tariff on Costa Rican goods
entering Nicaraguan territory. With respect to the latter,
he noted that Nicaraguans refer to such a tariff as a
"patriotic tax" to pay for legal fees. Costa Rica's exports
to Nicaragua, he pointed out, are approximately USD 200
million a year, and at least another USD 500 million in
exports pass through Nicaragua to points north. Tovar
believes the ICJ case will take four years to decide. The
economic cost of a Nicaraguan tariff, he said, would be
enormous, bankrupting companies and exacerbating poverty in
both countries. Such an action on the part of Nicaragua, he
claimed, would also violate the U.S.-Central
American-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR),
signed by both countries. Further, Central American economic
integration would suffer a serious setback, probably
scuttling plans for a free trade agreement with the European
Union, the region's biggest market after the United States.
Tovar said that he was going to the Legislative Assembly that
very afternoon to urge that Costa Rican legislators take no
reciprocal action against Nicaragua.
¶4. (SBU) Tovar told the assembled diplomats that he did not
expect or want them to take any position on the merits of the
border dispute. Rather, he asked for their understanding why
Costa Rica took the route of the ICJ and why Costa Rica
believed that retaliation by Nicaragua was unjustified. He
hoped that the countries represented in the room would use
their influence to persuade Nicaragua not to effect punitive
tariffs.
¶5. (U) Tovar distributed the following communique, which the
MFA released on September 28:
Begin Text:
Costa Rica announces the presentation of the case regarding
its rights of navigation on the San Juan River to the
International Court of Justice
The Government of Costa Rica announced today that shortly it
would present the case of its navigation rights on the San
Juan River, granted by the respective legal instruments, to
the International Court of Justice, which sits at The Hague.
The announcement of the decision taken by President Dr. Abel
Pacheco de la Espriella and the Minister of Foreign Affairs,
Roberto Tovar Faja, during the press conference which took
place today at the Presidential Office at 16:00 on Wednesday,
September 28, 2005.
The Minister of Foreign Affairs explained today that he has
instructed the Costa Rican Ambassador, Edgar Ugalde, to
present the case to the headquarters of the International
Court of Justice in The Hague.
The Costa Rican measure will be communicated in a few hours
to the Government of Nicaragua through a note that the
Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica, Roberto Tovar
Faja, will send to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of
Nicaragua, Norman Caldera.
The President of Costa Rica, Dr. Abel Pacheco de la
Espriella, said that despite these approaches and
opportunities, derived from the Agreement signed on September
26th, 2002 by the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica
and Nicaragua, "remaining as the only source of disagreement
between our two countries is the matter of the rights of
Costa Rica on the San Juan River."
He noted that the mechanisms of mediation and arbitration
proposed by Costa Rica were not accepted by Nicaragua. "As a
consequence, according to the peaceful coexistence principle
between nations and the faithful adherence to the Costa Rican
tradition of respect for International Law, we have decided
to present the case to the International Court of Justice."
"We hope for authentic national unity at this historical
moment," said President Dr. Abel Pacheco, and he added that
"Costa Rica and its rights are a priority over any private
interest."
The Costa Rican Foreign Minister, for his part, affirmed that
Costa Rica is calling upon "the highest international legal
instance in order to resolve, for good, the only cause of
disagreement with Nicaragua."
He reaffirmed that his country "is not asking for more rights
or less rights than accorded to Costa Rica by the pertinent
juridical instruments."
He said that "to call upon the International Court of Justice
could never interpreted as a break in the friendship between
the two countries. Both Costa Rica and Nicaragua have
accepted the Court as a means to ensure the peaceful
coexistence and mutual respect between nations."
"We sincerely call on the International Court of Justice to
make a decision that contributes to Costa Rica and Nicaragua
never again having a reason for discord," added the Minister
of Foreign Affairs.
"I hope that through this means we will leave future
generations with a relationship of fraternity and friendship
between our two countries, without disputes. It is our
historic responsibility," the Minister of Foreign Affairs,
Roberto Tovar Faja, declared.
End Text.
¶6. (SBU) After the meeting with diplomats ended, MFA adviser
Arnoldo Brenes told acting DCM that a 35 percent tariff would
violate CAFTA-DR. He said that the legal principle of "pacta
sunt servanda" in the Vienna convention on the Law of
Treaties requires that a country that signs a treaty, whether
it has ratified or not, not take any action contrary to the
letter and spirit of the treaty.
¶7. (C) In a meeting with Charge on September 28, former
president Oscar Arias, frontrunner in the February 2006
presidential election, said that the GOCR made an "error" in
not extending the three-year truce on the San Juan River
dispute. He said that Nicaraguan Ambassador to Costa Rica
Francisco Fiallos told him that he had urged the GON to agree
to arbitration but that Foreign Minister Caldera refused.
Arias said that it was "lamentable" that relations have been
damaged because of intransigence on both sides.
¶8. (C) Comment: A settlement at this point appears to be
highly unlikely. The problem now is to ensure that the
dispute stays in the court and does not escalate and affect
trade, immigration, law enforcement, and the need for Costa
Rica and Nicaragua to cooperate on a host of issues. Until
now we have not heard anyone in the GOCR talk about
retaliation if Nicaragua enacts a 35 percent tariff, but that
discussion will surely come.
FRISBIE