

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AF
AE
AR
AORC
AJ
AU
AM
ABLD
AL
AMGT
ASUP
AFIN
APER
ABUD
AVERY
APCS
AEMR
ADCO
APECO
ASIG
AG
AA
AS
AFFAIRS
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AMED
AO
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ATRN
AID
AC
AGMT
CH
CO
CS
CE
CU
CLINTON
CG
CVIS
CMGT
CI
CJAN
CF
COM
CASC
CA
CBW
CM
CDG
CR
COUNTER
CD
CWC
CKGR
CN
CPAS
CJUS
CV
CONS
CT
CY
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
ECON
EFIN
EAIR
EUN
EINV
ENRG
EG
ETRD
EPET
ETTC
ELAB
EU
ER
ET
EAGR
ECPS
ECIN
ELTN
EAID
EMIN
EWWT
EFIS
EIND
EC
ES
EN
EI
ENVR
ENGR
ENIV
EUNCH
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELN
EZ
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EINT
EUR
ECINECONCS
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EK
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IN
IC
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
IT
ICTY
IO
IA
IWC
ID
ICRC
ILC
INTELSAT
IMO
ISRAELI
IACI
ILO
ITRA
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
ICAO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
INTERPOL
IV
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KDEM
KCRM
KJUS
KTIA
KWBG
KPAL
KIPR
KTIP
KE
KNNP
KGHG
KICC
KV
KTFN
KU
KCFE
KDRG
KWMN
KSCA
KGIC
KCOR
KFRD
KPKO
KSUM
KPRP
KPAO
KBCT
KIRF
KCFC
KISL
KREC
KSPR
KHIV
KBIO
KMCA
KMPI
KFLU
KSTH
KBTR
KS
KOMC
KOMS
KSEP
KPRV
KFLO
KHLS
KN
KWWMN
KUNR
KLIG
KSTC
KZ
KG
KRAD
KOLY
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KAWK
KCIP
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KIDE
KSAF
KX
KWMNCS
KNEI
KCRS
KVPR
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KACT
KO
KFSC
KR
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MO
MX
MCAP
ML
MTCRE
MR
MP
MY
MU
MIL
MAR
MC
MRCRE
MTRE
MA
MEPI
MV
MPOS
MD
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OREP
OVIP
OFDP
ODIP
OPDC
OAS
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPRC
OVP
OSCI
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PREF
PTER
PARM
PBTS
PINR
PINS
PHSA
PK
POL
PM
PINT
PE
PINF
PEL
PA
PARMS
PO
PLN
PROP
PALESTINIAN
PAO
PL
POV
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
SENV
SY
SZ
SOCI
SO
SR
SNAR
SA
SP
SW
SMIG
SU
SCUL
SC
SAN
SN
SL
SG
SYR
SEVN
SF
SI
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TRGY
TU
TBIO
TH
TS
TSPL
TT
TPHY
TSPA
TI
TK
TIP
TERRORISM
TZ
TX
TW
TD
TP
TC
TO
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TURKEY
UK
UNGA
UN
UNHRC
UNMIK
UNO
UZ
UNSC
UP
UG
UNHCR
UNDC
US
UNAUS
USTR
UV
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UAE
USEU
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE168, COSTA RICA: STRATEGY FOR ADVANCING IPR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE168.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE168 | 2009-03-12 18:06 | 2011-03-21 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0168/01 0711858
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 121858Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0578
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 5054
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000168
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
EEB/TPP/IPE FOR JURBAN AND SKEAT
PLEASE PASS TO DOJ FOR BLIPMAN
PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR DOLIVER, AMALITO AND GVETERE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON KIPR PGOV PREL CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA: STRATEGY FOR ADVANCING IPR
REF: A) 07 SAN JOSE 0335
B) 08 SAN JOSE 0155
C) 09 SAN JOSE 0138
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Post leveraged the February 10-14 visit by
Department of Justice OPDAT Program Director Robert Lipman and U.S.
Judge Virginia Hernandez Covington to advance our three-point
strategy on intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement. Our
strategy seeks to (1) facilitate USPTO, DOJ, and other sources of
training for the Costa Rican judiciary, (2) encourage greater IPR
cooperation between other Latin American countries and Costa Rica,
and (3) collaborate on private sector IPR lobbying/pursuit of IPR
case resolution. Our aim is to slowly move the cause of IPR ahead
in Costa Rica, despite the minimal engagement of the Attorney
General (AG) on these issues. Lipman and Covington met with a broad
sampling of stakeholders (including the AG, and Mexican prosecutors,
via a DVC) in order to present a thorough overview of IPR issues.
Specific next steps include: pursuing DOJ-offered training for
judges at Costa Rica's Judicial School, supporting a private sector
alliance for prosecuting IPR crimes, engaging the AG's office on
training opportunities for prosecutors, and encouraging further
collaboration with the GOM and other regional countries on IPR
training and DVC exchanges. END SUMMARY.
------------------------------
SESSIONS WITH THE STAKEHOLDERS
------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) The Lipman/ Covington February 10-14 visit provided us the
opportunity to engage with a variety of stakeholders on IPR issues.
We arranged for meetings with the following institutions/ groups:
-- Judicial Investigative Agency (OIJ, FBI-equivalent);
-- University of Costa Rica;
-- National Registry (similar to USPTO in function);
-- Ministry of Public Security;
-- Judicial School;
-- Judicial branch IP attorneys;
-- Costa Rican Attorney General;
-- a forum of private sector executives;
-- a forum of judicial and legal officials; and
-- a DVC collaboration with Mexican IPR prosecutors (courtesy of
Embassy Mexico City).
¶3. (SBU) Typically, DOJ conducts a training module when it arrives
in country. However, due to the unique IPR circumstances in Costa
Rica -- recently passed legislation as part of CAFTA-DR entry into
force (EIF), an AG independent of the executive branch, and a lax
legal environment (Refs A, B, and C) -- Post and DOJ decided a
series of meetings with stakeholders would generate the best
information and guide overall engagement on IPR and tactics for IPR
training in Costa Rica.
-----------------------
PROFILE OF AN OBSTACLE
----------------------
¶4. (U) As reported in previous Special 301 Reports (Refs A, B, and
C), the office of the Costa Rican AG sits in the judicial branch,
(fiercely) independent of the executive branch. Within the judicial
branch, the President of the Judiciary (the President of the Supreme
Court) has only nominal authority over the office of Attorney
General. Thus, the AG office holder, in this case, Francisco
Dall'Anese, exercises broad powers and exerts independence from the
other branches of government including the judiciary.
¶5. (SBU) Currently, our relations with the AG are cordial and
formal. The formal aspect results from the AG's requirement that
all contact with the office of the AG on any issue, consular,
judicial, anti-drugs, trafficking in persons, IPR, etc., be
channeled through the Director, Office of Technical Assistance and
International Relations, Andrea Murillo. This "gatekeeper" approach
tends to constrain the pace and efficiency of communication.
Dall'Anese was re-elected to a second four-year term in late 2007,
but our contacts speculate that he is unlikely to run for a third
term in 2011.
¶6. (U) Regarding IPR, the AG repeatedly states two issues:
-- the AG's office does not have the resources to pursue IPR crimes
given other priorities, i.e. prosecuting two former Presidents and
organized crime; and
-- the private sector has the resources so it should prosecute IPR
crimes through civil and/or criminal action.
This publicly stated position posed a difficult issue for the GOCR
during CAFTA-DR implementation. The Ministry of Foreign Trade
(COMEX) agreed to USTR's request to establish a special IPR
prosecutor's office, which required then Vice President Laura
Chinchilla (now a presidential candidate) to request the AG to
establish the office. The AG committed to assigning responsibility
for IPR issues to an individual within the Miscellaneous Crimes
unit, but not to setting up a dedicated unit/office per se. Thanks
to USPTO and DOJ training opportunities in late 2008, we were able
to establish relations with the Miscellaneous Crimes issues (through
Director Murillo).
------------------------------------
ALTERNATIVE PATHS AROUND AN OBSTACLE
------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Considering the AG's IPR views and tactics, we designed a
three-point strategy for achieving IPR progress in the short and
long run, which, we hope, will chip away at resistance in the
judiciary.
-- First, invite all relevant components of the judiciary to as many
IPR-related training sessions (USPTO, DOJ, etc.) as possible. In a
conversation with the Ambassador in August 2008, Supreme Court
President Luis Paulino Mora indicated his interest in DOJ training
while affirming that there is a "cultural or reluctance" in Latin
America against IPR prosecution. We will use his interest to help
support our efforts (even if the AG's office is less cooperative at
times);
-- Second, in the interest of broadening the horizons of Costa Rican
prosecutors and attorneys, we contacted other U.S. Embassies in the
region to identify IPR prosecutors/ supporters working on the
frontline of enforcement. During the Lipman/ Covington visit, a DVC
linked Mexican IPR prosecutors (broadcasting from Embassy Mexico)
with Costa Rican prosecutors (broadcasting from Costa Rican
prosecutor's office). The exchange produced an informative
dialogue. In terms of pursuing cases and the formal organization of
IPR within the respective judiciaries, Mexico is certainly ahead of
Costa Rica. As a result of the DVC, Mexico offered to help Costa
Rica with IPR training. (COMMENT: Embassy San Jose thanks Econoff
Joseph Salazar of Embassy Mexico for making the arrangements with
Mexican IPR prosecutors and facilitating the DVC in Embassy Mexico
City. END COMMENT); and
-- Third, the Costa Rican private sector maintains a very different
view of IPR than the AG and believes that innovation must be
protected. During the Lipman/ Covington visit, key officials from
AmCham, the chamber of exporters, the chamber of information and
communications technology, and private law practices met with
Lipman, Covington and Emboffs to advance the idea of the private
sector aggressively pursuing IPR cases through a cooperative
alliance. Cases could be civil or criminal, since Costa Rican law
allows for private parties to pursue criminal cases in loose
cooperation with the AG's office. Such legal actions would
(hopefully) force the judiciary to recognize the importance of IPR
protection to Costa Rican commerce and highlight the issue in the
local media.
¶8. (U) Separate but related to our efforts, COMEX is strongly
supporting the IPR Council, a multi-agency body that meets weekly to
discuss IPR issues. Headed by the Ministry of Justice, the
Council's members include representatives from the Ministries of
Public Security, Science and Technology, and Trade (COMEX); Customs;
the National Registry; the Judicial School; the Judicial
Investigative Agency; and the Fiscal General. Adriana Chaves, a
prosecutor and a recipient of DOJ IPR training in late 2008,
represented the Fiscal General at the most recent meeting.
----------------------------------
GOALS FOR THE SHORT- AND LONG-TERM
----------------------------------
¶9. (SBU) The goals of our three-point IPR strategy (training,
international collaboration, and private sector support) are A) to
better collaborate with the Costa Rican judiciary in a variety of
ways and B) to produce cases for prosecution by way of private
sector pressure and involvement. Since Supreme Court President Mora
in essence requested training assistance, we will provide it, using
USPTO, DOJ, and even other countries in order to keep IPR issues on
the judiciary's radar screen. Meanwhile, the private sector will
mount a "flanking attack" by introducing cases into the court system
which will be heard by some judges with USPTO and/or DOJ training.
In the long run, i.e. post-2011, when Dall'Anese will likely have
left office, we hope that the USG-provided training and the cases
pushed by the private sector will have changed the "culture of
reluctance" sufficiently so that prosecutors and judges will
understand the importance of IPR enforcement and be more willing to
prosecute cases.
---------------
ONE OTHER LEVER
---------------
¶10. (SBU) The USG retains one other lever, of course, in the form
of the Special 301 Report. With the necessary legislation in place,
2009 will be an interesting trial for Costa Rica's IPR resolve. We
hope that the GOCR will make good use of training and collaboration
opportunities this year.
---------
NOW WHAT?
---------
¶11. (U) In the wake of the Lipman/ Covington visit and the Mexican
DVC, Post has several immediate initiatives to pursue:
-- a DOJ training session for judges at the Judicial School (in
June);
-- a meeting of the private sector alliance to outline a plan for
lobbying and for prosecuting IPR crimes. The lobbying campaign
would press the judiciary to prosecute IPR crimes, and the
legislature to approve the yet-to-be passed, IPR-related 14th
CAFTA-DR bill);
-- continued dialogue with the AG's office to determine what type of
training is appropriate for IPR staff prosecutors;
-- provision of DOJ software -- the Real-Time Analytic Intelligence
Database (RAID) application in Spanish -- to the Judicial
Investigative Agency (OIJ) at no cost (COMMENT: Investigative
analysts and document examiners in law enforcement use RAID to
provide document and evidence intelligence in a distributive
computer network environment. END COMMENT); and
-- Mexican training of IPR staff in the office of the AG.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶12. (SBU) Ultimately, we cannot predict how successful our
three-point strategy may be, but it underscores our commitment to
focus Costa Rican attention on the IPR issue. We position our
argument not only as a CAFTA-DR obligation but also as a fundamental
building block to Costa Rican commerce and the arts since innovation
and creativity are the basic ingredients of a flourishing business
and cultural environment. We welcome any change, no matter how
incremental, on the part of the AG regarding IPR enforcement.
However, we also believe that the most progress can be gained by
working around the AG, marking progress with cooperative partners in
the quest of small victories now, while preparing for what we hope
will be a more dramatic, positive shift in the attitude of the
office of the AG in the future.
CIANCHETTE