

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AF
AE
AR
AORC
AJ
AU
AM
ABLD
AL
AMGT
ASUP
AFIN
APER
ABUD
AVERY
APCS
AEMR
ADCO
APECO
ASIG
AG
AA
AS
AFFAIRS
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AMED
AO
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ATRN
AID
AC
AGMT
CH
CO
CS
CE
CU
CLINTON
CG
CVIS
CMGT
CI
CJAN
CF
COM
CASC
CA
CBW
CM
CDG
CR
COUNTER
CD
CWC
CKGR
CN
CPAS
CJUS
CV
CONS
CT
CY
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
ECON
EFIN
EAIR
EUN
EINV
ENRG
EG
ETRD
EPET
ETTC
ELAB
EU
ER
ET
EAGR
ECPS
ECIN
ELTN
EAID
EMIN
EWWT
EFIS
EIND
EC
ES
EN
EI
ENVR
ENGR
ENIV
EUNCH
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELN
EZ
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EINT
EUR
ECINECONCS
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EK
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IN
IC
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
IT
ICTY
IO
IA
IWC
ID
ICRC
ILC
INTELSAT
IMO
ISRAELI
IACI
ILO
ITRA
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
ICAO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
INTERPOL
IV
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KDEM
KCRM
KJUS
KTIA
KWBG
KPAL
KIPR
KTIP
KE
KNNP
KGHG
KICC
KV
KTFN
KU
KCFE
KDRG
KWMN
KSCA
KGIC
KCOR
KFRD
KPKO
KSUM
KPRP
KPAO
KBCT
KIRF
KCFC
KISL
KREC
KSPR
KHIV
KBIO
KMCA
KMPI
KFLU
KSTH
KBTR
KS
KOMC
KOMS
KSEP
KPRV
KFLO
KHLS
KN
KWWMN
KUNR
KLIG
KSTC
KZ
KG
KRAD
KOLY
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KAWK
KCIP
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KIDE
KSAF
KX
KWMNCS
KNEI
KCRS
KVPR
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KACT
KO
KFSC
KR
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MO
MX
MCAP
ML
MTCRE
MR
MP
MY
MU
MIL
MAR
MC
MRCRE
MTRE
MA
MEPI
MV
MPOS
MD
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OREP
OVIP
OFDP
ODIP
OPDC
OAS
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPRC
OVP
OSCI
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PREF
PTER
PARM
PBTS
PINR
PINS
PHSA
PK
POL
PM
PINT
PE
PINF
PEL
PA
PARMS
PO
PLN
PROP
PALESTINIAN
PAO
PL
POV
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
SENV
SY
SZ
SOCI
SO
SR
SNAR
SA
SP
SW
SMIG
SU
SCUL
SC
SAN
SN
SL
SG
SYR
SEVN
SF
SI
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TRGY
TU
TBIO
TH
TS
TSPL
TT
TPHY
TSPA
TI
TK
TIP
TERRORISM
TZ
TX
TW
TD
TP
TC
TO
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TURKEY
UK
UNGA
UN
UNHRC
UNMIK
UNO
UZ
UNSC
UP
UG
UNHCR
UNDC
US
UNAUS
USTR
UV
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UAE
USEU
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05SANJOSE1774, SECRET MEETINGS, DEAL-MAKING, TAXES, AND CAFTA-DR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SANJOSE1774.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SAN JOSE 001774
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
WHA/CEN
EB FOR WCRAFT
E FOR TSMITHAM
WHA FOR WMIELE
WHA/EPSC FOR KURS
H FOR JHAGAN
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR JYOUNG, CPADILLA, AMALITO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECPS ECON PREL PGOV SOCI CS
SUBJECT: SECRET MEETINGS, DEAL-MAKING, TAXES, AND CAFTA-DR
IN COSTA RICA
REF: (A) SAN JOSE 01455
¶1. (U) Summary. On August 3, 2005 Costa Rican dailies "La
Prensa Libre" and "Diario Extra" reported that members of
President Pacheco's Social Christian Union Party (PUSC) and
the National Liberation Party (PLN) met in secret on July
29, 2005 to discuss overcoming difficulties in passing the
Fiscal Reform bill. President Pacheco continues to require
passage of the Fiscal Reform bill prior to sending the
United States-Central American-Dominican Republic Free
Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) to the Legislative Assembly. In
a different venue, a key PUSC party member tested the
waters of how strongly the Libertarian Movement Party (ML)
deputies want to ratify CAFTA-DR by proposing a deal
involving removing numerous ML-proposed amendments to the
Fiscal Reform bill in exchange for sending the trade
agreement to the Assembly. These two actions are
significant in that they are unusual for Costa Rican
politics and show just how contentious the debate
surrounding all CAFTA-DR-related issues has become. End
Summary.
¶2. (U) Oscar Arias (PLN), the current front-runner in the
February Presidential election, and Ricardo Toledo, the
PUSC Presidential candidate, as well as other senior PLN
and PUSC Assembly members (deputies) attended the meeting.
Laura Chinchilla (PLN), a possible Arias running mate in
the upcoming February 2006 presidential elections, hosted
the meeting at her house. The purpose of the gathering was
to allow the PLN party members to urge PUSC deputies to
identify their issues with the bill and to prod them into
supporting it. The Fiscal Reform bill, although under a
"fast track" review, has gone nowhere fast, in part, due to
heavy opposition from the President's own party (Reftel).
[COMMENT: This is an odd situation in that the
"opposition" PLN is in the role of trying to convince the
President's own party members (PUSC) to support the
Administration's self-proclaimed top priority. President
Pacheco has not deigned to call legislators to lobby
himself for the bill. END COMMENT.]
¶3. (U) Together, the two parties' deputies, should they
decide to support it, number more than the minimum 29
necessary to pass the bill. Reportedly, the PLN leaders
requested that the PUSC deputies cease the political
rhetoric regarding opposition to Fiscal Reform and clearly
define their issues and identify what changes would be
necessary to win their votes. Some of the PUSC deputies,
including the Assembly President Gerardo Gonzalez do not
support the bill because they state that it does not
benefit the poor and does not ensure that rich Costa Ricans
will pay their fair share. One of the issues is that of
exempting taxation of income earned outside of Costa Rica.
They state that this would unfairly benefit the rich Costa
Ricans at the expense of the poor. However, it is
uncertain if this is the only issue because, as a voting
block, the PUSC deputies have not clearly expressed why
they oppose the bill.
¶4. (U) Arias reportedly talked to the PUSC deputies of the
need to be consistent and sincere and to avoid having the
Assembly put in an impossible position. Gonzalez's very
public opposition to the Fiscal Reform bill was
specifically mentioned. Arias and his fellow party members
complained that Gonzalez, as president of the Assembly,
promised to lengthen and devote Assembly sessions to
discuss the Fiscal Reform bill, but he has failed to follow
through on that promise. Mario Redondo (PUSC) stated that
he would look for consensus in his own party and hopes to
find common ground with President Pacheco's Administration
and the PLN.
¶5. (U) Other than the PUSC and PLN factions, the rest of
the deputies who make up the 57-member Assembly are from
several smaller parties with the third-largest contingent,
that of the Citizens' Action Party (PAC), having 8
deputies. Of note are the 5 Libertarian Movement Party
(ML) deputies who have historically stonewalled passage of
some bills by introducing hundreds of amendments that by
rule must be discussed, effectively killing the bills.
Since being introduced three years ago, consensus has
proven illusive on the Fiscal Reform bill. On May 23,
2005, the Assembly voted 38 to 19 to invoke the new "fast-
track" review of the bill, the first time using this
procedure. On the first and only day of debate, the ML
deputies proposed more than 1000 amendments in an attempt
to kill the bill (even with the fast-track review, all of
the amendments would need to be discussed and would result
in hundreds of hours of delay in voting for the bill).
Other changes made by the Administration, mostly exempting
special interests from paying taxes, have resulted in a
decrease of support of the current bill and have brought
the Assembly to the current impasse. [COMMENT: The ML
party strongly supports CAFTA-DR, but vehemently opposes
fiscal reform because it will cause a tax increase. END
COMMENT.]
¶6. (U) President Pacheco supports the bill in its current
form, and he is using the issue of sending CAFTA-DR to the
Assembly as leverage to assist its passage. Due to his
fears of strikes and violent demonstrations, he also is
using this strategy to avoid sending CAFTA-DR to the
Assembly during his administration. Finance Minister
Federico Carrillo has stated that passage of this bill is
necessary to ensure long-term fiscal stability of the
country. In response to PUSC deputies' opposition to the
issue of taxes on income earned outside of the country, on
August 4, 2005, the Administration proposed to introduce
changes to the bill that would require a resident to pay
taxes on income earned outside of Costa Rica only if the
income actually enters Costa Rican territory. [COMMENT:
Other contentious issues still exist and it is unclear if
this will satisfy enough deputies to approve the bill. END
COMMENT.]
--------------------------------------------- -------------
DEAL MAKING - REMOVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL
REFORM BILL FOR SENDING CAFTA-DR TO THE ASSEMBLY?
--------------------------------------------- -------------
¶7. (U) The numerous amendments proposed by the ML
deputies, even under the "fast track" review, would require
many hours of discussion and delay. In response to this,
the Chair of the Assembly's Mixed Commission responsible
for reviewing the Fiscal Reform bill, Mario Redondo of the
PUSC, proposed a deal with the ML deputies -- to send CAFTA-
DR to the Assembly after the ML deputies withdraw some or
all of their more-than-1000 proposed amendments to the
Fiscal Reform bill. The ML deputy Federico Malavassi
stated "We are not going to give in to such a ruse from
this guy ... this is extortion, and there is no way that
our deputies are going to accept it." [COMMENT: It is
highly unlikely that the Assembly or any member of the
Assembly has the power under the constitution to submit a
treaty for ratification. Most constitutional scholars
believe that only the President can do that. END COMMENT.]
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶8. (SBU) The two largest factions in the Assembly
discussing a very important issue such as Fiscal Reform is
certainly a good thing. However, the fact that these party
leaders felt that they had to do this in secret and outside
of the Assembly is a sign of the contentiousness of this
issue. The Fiscal Reform Bill, in its current form, has an
uphill battle to be approved. In the three years that it
has been under discussion, it has made little progress, and
the adoption of the so-called "fast-track" review of the
bill has done little to speed its passage. Knowing that
President Pacheco has placed this bill in the path to CAFTA-
DR ratification, some deputies may be using this issue as a
means to avoid even discussing CAFTA-DR. The unusual nature
of the discussions and the aforementioned deal proposed by
Redondo shows the desperation of the political situation
surrounding this issue.
KAPLAN