

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AF
AE
AR
AORC
AJ
AU
AM
ABLD
AL
AMGT
ASUP
AFIN
APER
ABUD
AVERY
APCS
AEMR
ADCO
APECO
ASIG
AG
AA
AS
AFFAIRS
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AMED
AO
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ATRN
AID
AC
AGMT
CH
CO
CS
CE
CU
CLINTON
CG
CVIS
CMGT
CI
CJAN
CF
COM
CASC
CA
CBW
CM
CDG
CR
COUNTER
CD
CWC
CKGR
CN
CPAS
CJUS
CV
CONS
CT
CY
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
ECON
EFIN
EAIR
EUN
EINV
ENRG
EG
ETRD
EPET
ETTC
ELAB
EU
ER
ET
EAGR
ECPS
ECIN
ELTN
EAID
EMIN
EWWT
EFIS
EIND
EC
ES
EN
EI
ENVR
ENGR
ENIV
EUNCH
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELN
EZ
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EINT
EUR
ECINECONCS
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EK
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IN
IC
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
IT
ICTY
IO
IA
IWC
ID
ICRC
ILC
INTELSAT
IMO
ISRAELI
IACI
ILO
ITRA
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
ICAO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
INTERPOL
IV
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KDEM
KCRM
KJUS
KTIA
KWBG
KPAL
KIPR
KTIP
KE
KNNP
KGHG
KICC
KV
KTFN
KU
KCFE
KDRG
KWMN
KSCA
KGIC
KCOR
KFRD
KPKO
KSUM
KPRP
KPAO
KBCT
KIRF
KCFC
KISL
KREC
KSPR
KHIV
KBIO
KMCA
KMPI
KFLU
KSTH
KBTR
KS
KOMC
KOMS
KSEP
KPRV
KFLO
KHLS
KN
KWWMN
KUNR
KLIG
KSTC
KZ
KG
KRAD
KOLY
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KAWK
KCIP
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KIDE
KSAF
KX
KWMNCS
KNEI
KCRS
KVPR
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KACT
KO
KFSC
KR
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MO
MX
MCAP
ML
MTCRE
MR
MP
MY
MU
MIL
MAR
MC
MRCRE
MTRE
MA
MEPI
MV
MPOS
MD
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OREP
OVIP
OFDP
ODIP
OPDC
OAS
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPRC
OVP
OSCI
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PREF
PTER
PARM
PBTS
PINR
PINS
PHSA
PK
POL
PM
PINT
PE
PINF
PEL
PA
PARMS
PO
PLN
PROP
PALESTINIAN
PAO
PL
POV
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
SENV
SY
SZ
SOCI
SO
SR
SNAR
SA
SP
SW
SMIG
SU
SCUL
SC
SAN
SN
SL
SG
SYR
SEVN
SF
SI
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TRGY
TU
TBIO
TH
TS
TSPL
TT
TPHY
TSPA
TI
TK
TIP
TERRORISM
TZ
TX
TW
TD
TP
TC
TO
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TURKEY
UK
UNGA
UN
UNHRC
UNMIK
UNO
UZ
UNSC
UP
UG
UNHCR
UNDC
US
UNAUS
USTR
UV
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UAE
USEU
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09BOGOTA3127, COURTS CONSIDER TWO CONTROVERSIAL STRIKES AT DRUMMOND AND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BOGOTA3127.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09BOGOTA3127 | 2009-10-05 15:03 | 2011-03-16 12:12 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Bogota |
Appears in these articles: http://www.elespectador.com/wikileaks |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHBO #3127/01 2781554
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 051553Z OCT 09
FM AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0218
INFO RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RHMFISS/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/FBI WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 0063
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHINGTON DC
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 0062
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA 0069
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
C O N F I D E N T I A L BOGOTA 003127
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 2019/10/05
TAGS: ELAB EAID ETRD KJUS PHUM PREL USTR CO
SUBJECT: COURTS CONSIDER TWO CONTROVERSIAL STRIKES AT DRUMMOND AND
FENOCO
REF: BOGOTA 1751
CLASSIFIED BY: Marcos C. Mandojana, Deputy Political Counselor;
REASON: 1.4(B), (D)
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (C) Two controversial court cases concerning strikes in the coal
sector have reached the highest levels of the Colombian judicial
system. The National Mining and Energy Industry Workers' Union
(SINTRAMIENERGETICA) initiated the first strike over work-safety
issues at Drummond's La Loma coal mine, shutting down production
for four days in March 2009. The National Union of Workers in
Metal Mechanics, Metallurgy, Iron, Steel, Electro-Metals, and
Related Industries (SINTRAIME) convened the second strike on March
24 at Northern Colombian Railways (FENOCO) -- 41% Drummond-owned --
due to the company's refusal to recognize the union. SINTRAIME
halted regional rail shipments of coal for 26 days, until local
authorities forcibly reestablished rail service. Together the two
strikes cost Drummond, FENOCO, and regional governments millions in
revenue and royalties. The Supreme Court recently ruled that the
SINTRAIME strike was illegal, and FENOCO fired 16 SINTRAIME leaders
as a result. Drummond has not fired anyone yet, but Drummond
executives said they would fire 15-20 SINTRAMIENERGETICA leaders if
the Supreme Court upholds a lower court ruling that the strike was
illegal. End Summary.
STRIKE ONE: UNION CHARGES COMPANY NEGLIGENCE
--------------------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) SINTRAMIENERGETICA leaders and Drummond executives
confirmed that the March 22 death of DagobertoClavijoBarranco
precipitated the March 23 strike. Clavijo died when he lost
control of a tanker truck and it plunged off a 15-meter embankment.
SINTRAMIENERGETICA XXXXXXXXXXXX characterized the accident as the latest in a series of deaths and injuries attributable to company negligence. Clavijo, who had only been on the job a month, was hired via a contractor and never received adequate training in operating the vehicle, XXXXXXXXXXXX said. XXXXXXXXXXXX told us that nine mine workers and two dock workers have been killed, and 275 workers
seriously injured, in the 13 years that Drummond has operated mines
in the region.
¶3. (SBU) Drummond Vice President of Corporate Affairs Jose Miguel
Linares supplied PolOffs with Mr. Clavijo's training reports and a
copy of the internal investigation into the accident. Company
records show that Clavijo received 106 hours of tanker truck
operation and safety instruction in February 2009, and scored
"adequate" to "excellent" on each module/exam. The internal
investigation concluded that neither "substandard conditions" nor
"mechanical failure" caused the accident. Linares told us that
"operator error" was the likely cause. He also said that the
safety incidence rate -- an index measuring time lost due to safety
incidents per 100 employees per year -- at Drummond's mines has
been consistently lower than the U.S. average in surface mining
activity (.33 compared to 1.33 in 2008).
¶4. (SBU) An estimated 8,000 direct and indirect Drummond employees
participated in the four-day strike, including 2,200
SINTRAMIENERGETICA members. XXXXXXXXXXXX for the
United Federation of Workers in the Mining, Energy, Metallurgy,
Chemical, and Similar Industries (FUNTRAENERGETICA) -- the umbrella
confederation that includes SINTRAMIENERGETICA -- said that the
strike ended when a majority of the workers decided to return to
the mine, citing their financial imperative to work given hard
economic times. Drummond issued a statement on March 27 calling
the strike illegal and thanking workers for breaking ranks with
union leaders and returning to their jobs.
COURT DECISION ON STRIKE LEGALITY PENDING
-----------------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) The matter was referred to the courts pursuant to Law 1210
of 2008, which transferred authority to determine strike legality
to the court system in line with ILO recommendations (reftel). On
July 21, the Administrative Tribunal of Valledupar, Cesar ruled
that the strike was illegal because it had not taken place as part
of a collective bargaining process in accordance with Substantive
Work Code (CST) Article 444, nor had it been carried out using the
proper procedures as defined by CST Article 445. The legal window
for initiating a strike is 2-10 days following a general assembly
vote in favor of striking. The SINTRAMIENERGETICA strike was
extemporaneous, and did not adhere to the proper legal procedures.
SINTRAMIENERGETICA has appealed the decision to the Supreme Court,
where it is pending.
¶6. (C) According to Colombian labor law (CST Article 450), a
company may dismiss employees who participated in an illegal
strike. (NOTE: Colombian labor leaders advocate deletion or
revision of Article 450, while private sector companies say it
constitutes an important check and balance in company-labor
relations. End Note.) In a September 23 press statement, Drummond
said it had dismissed five union workers for illegal activities --
destruction of property and violence -- during the strike, and
suspended an additional four as a step towards dismissal pending
the Supreme Court ruling on strike legality (expected in two to
three months). Drummond's Linares told us the company may fire up
to 20 of the most active organizers if the court rules in the
company's favor.
STRIKE TWO: UNION PROTESTS NON-RECOGNITION
------------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Problems between SINTRAIME AND FENOCO began on November 4,
2008 when 350 FENOCO workers joined the metals industry union and
attempted to initiate collective bargaining. The railway company
refused to recognize SINTRAIME, largely on the basis that it had a
preexisting collective bargaining agreement with another union.
FENOCO argued that Law 904 of 1951 prohibited more than one
convention from existing within the same company. It also claimed
that SINTRAIME, a metals industry union, had no legal right to
organize workers in the transportation sector.
¶8. (SBU) SINTRAIME appealed to the Ministry of Social Protection
(MPS) to force FENOCO to negotiate, but the MPS ultimately took a
legal position favorable to the company. On March 16, the MPS
issued a resolution declaring that FENOCO was not legally obligated
to negotiate with SINTRAIME because the union did not meet the
legal requirements to organize FENOCO workers. On March 24,
SINTRAIME declared the strike and occupied the rail lines, citing
FENOCO's failure to fulfill its legal obligation to negotiate and
"MPS passivity" in the matter, unions leaders said.
¶9. (SBU) The strike lasted 26 days, until April 18 when the MPS
ordered local authorities to dislodge the protestors and restore
rail transportation on the grounds that the railway service
provided by FENOCO under government concession was certified by the
National Institute for Concessions (INCO) as an "essential public
service." Under Colombian law, such certification prohibits
strikes by employees of contract companies. The MPS is no longer
the final arbiter of strike legality though (Law 1210 of 2008).
Accordingly, the matter was referred to the Superior Tribunal of
Santa Marta.
FENOCO WINS ON APPEAL, FIRES 16 UNIONISTS
-----------------------------------------
¶10. (SBU) The Labor Chamber of the Superior Tribunal of Santa Marta
ruled on April 23 that the company must recognize and negotiate
with SINTRAIME in accordance with ILO Convention 154, regardless of
whether it has a preexisting convention with another union. The
Tribunal also ruled that the company must recognize the union even
if its mandate and statutes do not extend to the workers involved,
since unions are free to revise and extend their articles of
incorporation. Finally, it ruled that transporting coal to port by
rail did not constitute an "essential public service." FENOCO
appealed to the Supreme Court.
¶11. (C) The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's ruling that
multiple conventions may coexist within a single company. It
further ruled that transportation is an essential public service,
citing Constitutional Court judgment C-450 of 1995, but said each
case should be interpreted on an individual basis (the judgment was
equivocal on whether transportation was essential in this specific
case). Finally, the Supreme Court ruled that the strike was
illegal because SINTRAIME initiated it after the legal period set
forth in CST Article 445. FENOCO President and CEO Peter Burrowes
told us that the company fired 16 union leaders on the basis of the
ruling. SINTRAIME leaders interpreted the affair as a victory in
terms of the revenue losses ($150 million) they were able to impose
on Drummond and FENOCO.
BROWNFIELD
=======================CABLE ENDS============================