

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AF
AE
AR
AORC
AJ
AU
AM
ABLD
AL
AMGT
ASUP
AFIN
APER
ABUD
AVERY
APCS
AEMR
ADCO
APECO
ASIG
AG
AA
AS
AFFAIRS
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AMED
AO
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ATRN
AID
AC
AGMT
CH
CO
CS
CE
CU
CLINTON
CG
CVIS
CMGT
CI
CJAN
CF
COM
CASC
CA
CBW
CM
CDG
CR
COUNTER
CD
CWC
CKGR
CN
CPAS
CJUS
CV
CONS
CT
CY
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
ECON
EFIN
EAIR
EUN
EINV
ENRG
EG
ETRD
EPET
ETTC
ELAB
EU
ER
ET
EAGR
ECPS
ECIN
ELTN
EAID
EMIN
EWWT
EFIS
EIND
EC
ES
EN
EI
ENVR
ENGR
ENIV
EUNCH
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELN
EZ
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EINT
EUR
ECINECONCS
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EK
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IN
IC
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
IT
ICTY
IO
IA
IWC
ID
ICRC
ILC
INTELSAT
IMO
ISRAELI
IACI
ILO
ITRA
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
ICAO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
INTERPOL
IV
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KDEM
KCRM
KJUS
KTIA
KWBG
KPAL
KIPR
KTIP
KE
KNNP
KGHG
KICC
KV
KTFN
KU
KCFE
KDRG
KWMN
KSCA
KGIC
KCOR
KFRD
KPKO
KSUM
KPRP
KPAO
KBCT
KIRF
KCFC
KISL
KREC
KSPR
KHIV
KBIO
KMCA
KMPI
KFLU
KSTH
KBTR
KS
KOMC
KOMS
KSEP
KPRV
KFLO
KHLS
KN
KWWMN
KUNR
KLIG
KSTC
KZ
KG
KRAD
KOLY
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KAWK
KCIP
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KIDE
KSAF
KX
KWMNCS
KNEI
KCRS
KVPR
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KACT
KO
KFSC
KR
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MO
MX
MCAP
ML
MTCRE
MR
MP
MY
MU
MIL
MAR
MC
MRCRE
MTRE
MA
MEPI
MV
MPOS
MD
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OREP
OVIP
OFDP
ODIP
OPDC
OAS
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPRC
OVP
OSCI
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PREF
PTER
PARM
PBTS
PINR
PINS
PHSA
PK
POL
PM
PINT
PE
PINF
PEL
PA
PARMS
PO
PLN
PROP
PALESTINIAN
PAO
PL
POV
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
SENV
SY
SZ
SOCI
SO
SR
SNAR
SA
SP
SW
SMIG
SU
SCUL
SC
SAN
SN
SL
SG
SYR
SEVN
SF
SI
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TRGY
TU
TBIO
TH
TS
TSPL
TT
TPHY
TSPA
TI
TK
TIP
TERRORISM
TZ
TX
TW
TD
TP
TC
TO
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TURKEY
UK
UNGA
UN
UNHRC
UNMIK
UNO
UZ
UNSC
UP
UG
UNHCR
UNDC
US
UNAUS
USTR
UV
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UAE
USEU
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE531, COSTA RICA MAKES A BET ON GAMBLING LEGISLATION
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE531.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE531 | 2009-06-25 22:10 | 2011-03-21 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0531/01 1762215
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 252215Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0967
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHWN/AMEMBASSY BRIDGETOWN 0804
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000531
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC:AWONG, AND EEB/ESC/TFS
TREASURY FOR LMCDONALD, CCORREA, CGAMBLE AND SSENICH
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EFIN EINV PGOV PREL CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA MAKES A BET ON GAMBLING LEGISLATION
REF: San Jose 0277 (NOTAL)
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY. June 8-12, Rick Hector and Charles Klingman of
Treasury's Office of Technical Assistance (OTA) advised Costa Rican
Finance (Hacienda) Minister Guillermo Zuniga and Vice Minister Jenny
Phillips on the pros and cons of legislating and regulating the
gaming industry. Their week of meetings and close consultations
followed requests made by Zuniga to Treasury Deputy Assistant
Secretary Larry McDonald in two previous meetings, and an offer made
in March by a visiting OTA financial enforcement assessment team.
Hacienda has concluded that it wants to create a tight legislative
and regulatory regime to control (and tax) gaming, including
internet activity and brick-and- mortar casinos. The tax revenue
potential and the opportunity to restrict money laundering are
especially attractive to the GOCR. However, passing the required
legislation in the last 10 months of the Arias administration will
require substantial political will, and may prove impossible. We
will support Hacienda in its quest and advocate for OTA financial
enforcement funding. The GOCR will need technical (and a little
political) assistance to help create and complete legislation before
the next administration takes office in May 2010. END SUMMARY.
--------------------------------------
HIGH LEVEL ATTENTION FROM THE HACIENDA
--------------------------------------
¶2. (U) The OTA ad hoc trip to Costa Rica responded to a request by
Minister Zuniga for specific, near-term assistance on gaming
regulatory and taxation issues. Also, the trip was the fulfillment
of an offer to the GOCR made by an OTA assessment team in March
(reftel). As an indication of the Minister's priority for gaming
regulation, Zuniga spent three hours with the OTA team on the first
day of their visit, then reported directly to President Arias on the
key points from the session.
------------------------
THE CONUNDRUM OF U.S. LAW
------------------------
¶3. (U) Existing USG law permits AmCits to gamble over the internet
but does not permit the offer of gambling services to AmCits.
Between 80-90 countries currently offer online gambling services,
including Costa Rica. Restrictions for blocking AmCit access to
gaming services are not enforced by country, but by individual
companies -- though rarely -- in order to avoid possible U.S.
prosecution. The OTA team explained the general tendency of the USG
is to tolerate one of two enforcement regimes: tight legislative
and regulatory restrictions on gaming and looser restrictions in
other areas of economic crimes, or (2) loose legislative and
regulatory restrictions on gaming and tight restrictions in other
areas of economic crimes. Costa Rica is loose on both accounts;
hence, Costa Rica needs to address one or the other side of the
financial crimes scale.
---------------------------
EXISTING DRAFT BILL: NO GO
---------------------------
¶4. (U) Advisors Hector and Klingman evaluated an existing bill --
drafted principally by the Hacienda and national legislator Andrea
Morales (IND), whose work in the internet gambling sector before
running for office has given her a special interest in the issue.
The OTA team concluded that the draft bill failed to address key
gaming issues such as requiring the deposit of company funds in
on-shore banking accounts. As Advisor Hector shared, "Without the
records (accounts) in Costa Rica, you (the GOCR) have no basis on
which to tax." In short, the bill was unusable. Whatever form a
new law will take, it will update the current law which went into
effect in 1921, long before the dawn of e-commerce.
------------------------------
NEW DRAFT BILL: OTHER MODELS?
------------------------------
¶5. (U) Industry experts estimate annual worldwide internet gaming
revenues at USD 14 billion. A significant proportion of the
business operates in Antigua and Costa Rica, though there are no
hard facts on country share. Antigua adopted and enforces a strict
legislative and regulatory code. The OTA team cited Antigua's code
as a worthy model and recommended the Antigua approach (assuming a
tight legal and regulatory regime was the policy option chosen by
the GOCR).
-------------------------
THE HACIENDA TIPS ITS HAND
-------------------------
¶6. (U) The OTA Advisors outlined various policy approaches for the
GOCR regarding the "tightness" or "looseness" of the regulatory
environment and resulting implications. Just as important, the
advisors were exceedingly clear on how to approach a legal and
regulatory regime: there is no partial or mid-point remedy: either
approach gaming in a comprehensive manner, or don't bother. After
several days of meetings, the Hacienda stated its desire to proceed,
post haste, with drafting new legislation with supporting
regulations. OTA also argued that gaming legislation should not be
restricted to internet activity but should include brick-and-mortar
casinos -- which are plentiful in Costa Rica. At the conclusion of
the out-brief with Hacienda, both the Minister and the Vice Minister
eagerly expressed their desire to start drafting -- using Antigua as
a model -- and to solicit additional guidance from OTA gaming
experts.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶7. (SBU) A driving factor behind the Hacienda's interest in gaming
relates directly to tax revenues. As previously reported (reftel),
the GOCR does not regulate or tax the gaming industry. The
potential for money laundering thus abounds, particularly in an
environment of growing criminality and narco-trafficking. The
prospective government "take" of gaming revenue in the form of
taxation, and establishing regulations to dampen or reduce the
growing potential of illicit cash transfers appeals to the GOCR.
Furthermore, with GDP contraction of 1.8 percent forecasted for
2009, due to the global financial crisis, and a related tax revenue
shortfall projection of USD 940 million, the GOCR is looking for new
sources of revenue.
¶8. (SBU) The Arias Administration will need to muster its political
allies to pass the desired legislation in the remaining months of
its term, which ends April 30, 2010. Legislator Morales' draft bill,
which may be discussed in committee beginning the week of June 22,
will require extensive revision, if not wholesale replacement with
something new. The GOCR can control the legislative agenda for the
month of August and from December-April. However, the national
election in February 2010 will certainly disrupt the GOCR's focus
during the latter period. Pushing such legislation forward will
take political will, skill and discipline, commodities in especially
short supply during the highly-politicized waning months of a Costa
Rican administration.
¶9. (SBU) The potential bright spot was the selection this month of
former VP (and Justice Minister) Laura Chinchilla as the PLN party's
presidential candidate. If she wins the February election, there
may be a post-election, pre-transition PLN push, with sufficient
political support, to complete a more ambitious legislative agenda,
including a workable gaming regulation bill, in order to help launch
her administration.
¶10. (SBU) We envision ongoing USG counsel on gaming regulation as a
key element of a formal OTA financial enforcement program for Costa
Rica. This can provide the right guidance on a complex topic --
internet and casino gambling -- and directly benefit efforts to
investigate and prosecute money laundering and to organize financial
and law enforcement agencies to combat financial crimes. Improved
financial enforcement by Costa Rica directly supports Mission
Strategic Plan objectives.
BRENNAN