

Currently released so far... 2429 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2011/01/13
2011/01/12
2011/01/11
2011/01/10
2011/01/09
2011/01/07
2011/01/05
2011/01/04
2011/01/02
2011/01/01
2010/12/30
2010/12/29
2010/12/28
2010/12/27
2010/12/26
2010/12/25
2010/12/24
2010/12/23
2010/12/22
2010/12/21
2010/12/20
2010/12/19
2010/12/18
2010/12/17
2010/12/16
2010/12/15
2010/12/14
2010/12/13
2010/12/12
2010/12/11
2010/12/10
2010/12/09
2010/12/08
2010/12/07
2010/12/06
2010/12/05
2010/12/04
2010/12/03
2010/12/02
2010/12/01
2010/11/30
2010/11/29
2010/11/28
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Paris
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Browse by tag
AF
AE
ASEC
AORC
AJ
AM
AR
AEMR
AMGT
APER
AG
AS
AU
AGMT
AFIN
ABUD
ACOA
AEC
AO
AX
AMED
ADCO
AODE
AC
AL
ASIG
ABLD
CH
CO
CI
COUNTERTERRORISM
CA
CY
CASC
CU
CJAN
CMGT
CVIS
CE
COUNTER
CBW
CG
CLINTON
CDG
CIA
CACM
CDB
CS
CD
CV
CF
CN
CIS
CM
CONDOLEEZZA
COE
CR
CTM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CPAS
CWC
EFIN
ECON
EWWT
EINVEFIN
ES
ELAB
EU
ETTC
EAID
ENRG
ETRD
EUN
EC
EG
EINV
EXTERNAL
ER
EPET
EAGR
EIND
ECPS
EMIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EN
EZ
ET
EUC
EI
EAIR
ELTN
EREL
ECIN
EFIS
EINT
ENVR
ECA
EINVETC
EINN
ENGR
EUR
ELECTIONS
ECUN
IR
IS
IMO
IZ
IN
INTERPOL
IT
INRB
IAEA
ID
IV
ICTY
IQ
ICAO
IPR
IRAJ
INRA
INRO
IC
IIP
ITPHUM
IWC
IO
IRAQI
ICRC
IF
ILC
IEFIN
ITALY
ITALIAN
KDEM
KTFN
KNNP
KWBG
KPAL
KPKO
KSCA
KCRM
KR
KWMN
KN
KU
KV
KJUS
KE
KISL
KCOR
KPAO
KG
KTIP
KICC
KBCT
KSPR
KHLS
KTIA
KMDR
KGHG
KUNR
KS
KIRF
KFRD
KIPR
KAWC
KPWR
KCIP
KSUM
KWAC
KMIG
KOLY
KZ
KAWK
KSEC
KIFR
KDRG
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KBIO
KHIV
KNUC
KPLS
KIRC
KACT
KGIC
KRAD
KCOM
KMCA
KHDP
KDEV
KPRP
KCFE
KOCI
KTDB
KMRS
KLIG
KGIT
KSTC
KPAK
KNEI
KSEP
KPOA
KFLU
KNPP
MARR
MASS
MOPS
MTCRE
MNUC
MY
MX
MCAP
MO
MPOS
MAR
MD
MZ
MEPP
MA
MR
ML
MIL
MOPPS
MTCR
MAPP
MU
MG
MASC
MCC
MK
MTRE
MP
MDC
PGOV
PTER
PREL
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PHUM
PARM
PINR
PINS
PSI
PA
PE
PO
PINT
PL
PSOE
PU
POL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PROP
PBIO
PECON
PM
PREF
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PGOF
PMIL
PTERE
PF
PY
PGGV
PNR
POV
POLITICS
PEPR
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WARSAW1228, POLAND COULD ACCEPT “COMPLEMENTARY” CONTINGENCY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WARSAW1228.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WARSAW1228 | 2009-12-18 14:02 | 2010-12-06 21:09 | SECRET | Embassy Warsaw |
VZCZCXRO0375
OO RUEHSL
DE RUEHWR #1228 3521436
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 181436Z DEC 09
FM AMEMBASSY WARSAW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9265
INFO RUEHXP/ALL NATO POST COLLECTIVE
S E C R E T WARSAW 001228
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EUR/CE (GLANTZ) AND EUR/RPM
EO 12958 DECL: 12/18/2019
TAGS NATO, MCAP, MARR, PREL, PL
SUBJECT: POLAND COULD ACCEPT “COMPLEMENTARY” CONTINGENCY
PLANNING FOR POLAND AND BALTIC STATES
REF: STATE 127892
Classified By: DCM William Heidt for Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (S) SUMMARY: Deputy DefMin Stanislaw Komorowski and MFA Security Policy Director Adam Kobieracki reacted similarly when DCM raised reftel points -- Poland strongly agrees with the necessity of contingency planning for the Baltic States but would like to avoid delays in the completion of the EAGLE GUARDIAN plan for Poland. However, both Komorowski and Kobieracki suggested that Poland might be able to accept a “creatively packaged” plan that included separate but complementary components (“chapters”) for Poland and the Baltic States. They agreed that discussions should not be made public. END SUMMARY.
¶2. (S) In a meeting with DCM on December 17, Komorowski expressed satisfaction with the level of cooperation with other NATO contingency planners on EAGLE GUARDIAN. Poles were active participants in the process and looked forward to its completion by the end of February or early March. Komorowski was skeptical that a regional approach to contingency planning was the best way ahead. Komorowski said Warsaw would prefer a unique plan for Poland, although he allowed that Warsaw could accept the notion of two complementary chapters for Poland and the Baltic States within EAGLE GUARDIAN. More important for Poland was the need to avoid any delay in completing the plan or to rehash already-agreed components, such as the threat assessment. He added that he “agreed entirely” that the issue should remain as secret as possible, and that it was in the “common interest” to avoid public discussion of NATO contingency planning.
¶3. (S) Kobieracki made similar points to DCM on December 15, and suggested the USG engage in detailed consultations with Polish officials in Brussels and with the General Staff in Warsaw. He said Poland had hoped that a revised EAGLE GUARDIAN plan could be used as a starting point for developing contingency plans for the Baltic States rather than become intertwined with them. He hinted that a creatively packaged regional plan that met Polish needs in terms of conditionality and automaticity might be acceptable, but cautioned that Warsaw would need assurances that NATO’s defense of Poland was an “issue in its own right” and not dependent on the security or defense of other NATO members. Kobieracki insisted that Poland would also need assurances that regional planning would not negatively impact on NATO’s response to prospective crises, particularly with respect to pre-planned deployments. He urged that completion of EAGLE GUARDIAN not be delayed to accommodate incorporation of the Baltic States into a regional contingency plan. Kobieracki agreed that contingency planning discussions should not be made public. FEINSTEIN