

Currently released so far... 1463 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/14
2010/12/13
2010/12/12
2010/12/11
2010/12/10
2010/12/09
2010/12/08
2010/12/07
2010/12/06
2010/12/05
2010/12/04
2010/12/03
2010/12/02
2010/12/01
2010/11/30
2010/11/29
2010/11/28
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Paris
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Browse by tag
CH
CIA
CACM
CDB
CU
CO
CI
CS
CVIS
CD
CV
CA
CJAN
CLINTON
CASC
CE
CMGT
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CY
COUNTER
CF
CIS
CM
CG
CN
CDG
ENVR
ECON
EG
ETRD
EAID
EFIN
ETTC
EAIR
EINV
EPET
ENRG
EWWT
EIND
ELAB
EN
ES
EAGR
EU
EUN
EINT
ELTN
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
EC
EXTERNAL
EI
ECPS
EFIS
EMIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EZ
EREL
ET
ER
EUC
KDEM
KSPR
KNNP
KN
KTFN
KCRM
KWBG
KPAL
KACT
KG
KCOR
KZ
KS
KGCC
KJUS
KISL
KSUM
KPIN
KGHG
KSCA
KDRG
KGIC
KRAD
KPRP
KU
KMDR
KHLS
KE
KPAO
KBIO
KIRF
KPKO
KUNR
KCIP
KOLY
KHIV
KCFE
KDEV
KV
KAWK
KIPR
KNPP
KR
KWMN
KTIP
KICC
KTIA
KFRD
KAWC
KPWR
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KNUC
KCOM
KMCA
KIRC
KHDP
MOPS
MNUC
MARR
MASS
MO
MX
MCAP
ML
MA
MTCRE
MZ
MIL
MR
MY
MU
MPOS
MAR
MD
MEPP
MOPPS
MG
MASC
MP
MTCR
MAPP
MCC
MK
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PINR
PARM
PK
PTER
PROP
PREF
PINS
PINL
PL
PM
PHSA
POL
PE
PBIO
PA
PO
POLITICS
PEPR
PBTS
PSI
PINT
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PECON
PAK
PGOF
POGOV
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WARSAW1228, POLAND COULD ACCEPT “COMPLEMENTARY” CONTINGENCY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WARSAW1228.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WARSAW1228 | 2009-12-18 14:02 | 2010-12-06 21:09 | SECRET | Embassy Warsaw |
VZCZCXRO0375
OO RUEHSL
DE RUEHWR #1228 3521436
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 181436Z DEC 09
FM AMEMBASSY WARSAW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9265
INFO RUEHXP/ALL NATO POST COLLECTIVE
S E C R E T WARSAW 001228
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EUR/CE (GLANTZ) AND EUR/RPM
EO 12958 DECL: 12/18/2019
TAGS NATO, MCAP, MARR, PREL, PL
SUBJECT: POLAND COULD ACCEPT “COMPLEMENTARY” CONTINGENCY
PLANNING FOR POLAND AND BALTIC STATES
REF: STATE 127892
Classified By: DCM William Heidt for Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (S) SUMMARY: Deputy DefMin Stanislaw Komorowski and MFA Security Policy Director Adam Kobieracki reacted similarly when DCM raised reftel points -- Poland strongly agrees with the necessity of contingency planning for the Baltic States but would like to avoid delays in the completion of the EAGLE GUARDIAN plan for Poland. However, both Komorowski and Kobieracki suggested that Poland might be able to accept a “creatively packaged” plan that included separate but complementary components (“chapters”) for Poland and the Baltic States. They agreed that discussions should not be made public. END SUMMARY.
¶2. (S) In a meeting with DCM on December 17, Komorowski expressed satisfaction with the level of cooperation with other NATO contingency planners on EAGLE GUARDIAN. Poles were active participants in the process and looked forward to its completion by the end of February or early March. Komorowski was skeptical that a regional approach to contingency planning was the best way ahead. Komorowski said Warsaw would prefer a unique plan for Poland, although he allowed that Warsaw could accept the notion of two complementary chapters for Poland and the Baltic States within EAGLE GUARDIAN. More important for Poland was the need to avoid any delay in completing the plan or to rehash already-agreed components, such as the threat assessment. He added that he “agreed entirely” that the issue should remain as secret as possible, and that it was in the “common interest” to avoid public discussion of NATO contingency planning.
¶3. (S) Kobieracki made similar points to DCM on December 15, and suggested the USG engage in detailed consultations with Polish officials in Brussels and with the General Staff in Warsaw. He said Poland had hoped that a revised EAGLE GUARDIAN plan could be used as a starting point for developing contingency plans for the Baltic States rather than become intertwined with them. He hinted that a creatively packaged regional plan that met Polish needs in terms of conditionality and automaticity might be acceptable, but cautioned that Warsaw would need assurances that NATO’s defense of Poland was an “issue in its own right” and not dependent on the security or defense of other NATO members. Kobieracki insisted that Poland would also need assurances that regional planning would not negatively impact on NATO’s response to prospective crises, particularly with respect to pre-planned deployments. He urged that completion of EAGLE GUARDIAN not be delayed to accommodate incorporation of the Baltic States into a regional contingency plan. Kobieracki agreed that contingency planning discussions should not be made public. FEINSTEIN