

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE168, COSTA RICA: STRATEGY FOR ADVANCING IPR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE168.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE168 | 2009-03-12 18:58 | 2011-03-21 16:30 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0168/01 0711858
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 121858Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0578
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 5054
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000168
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
EEB/TPP/IPE FOR JURBAN AND SKEAT
PLEASE PASS TO DOJ FOR BLIPMAN
PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR DOLIVER, AMALITO AND GVETERE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON KIPR PGOV PREL CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA: STRATEGY FOR ADVANCING IPR
REF: A) 07 SAN JOSE 0335
B) 08 SAN JOSE 0155
C) 09 SAN JOSE 0138
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Post leveraged the February 10-14 visit by
Department of Justice OPDAT Program Director Robert Lipman and U.S.
Judge Virginia Hernandez Covington to advance our three-point
strategy on intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement. Our
strategy seeks to (1) facilitate USPTO, DOJ, and other sources of
training for the Costa Rican judiciary, (2) encourage greater IPR
cooperation between other Latin American countries and Costa Rica,
and (3) collaborate on private sector IPR lobbying/pursuit of IPR
case resolution. Our aim is to slowly move the cause of IPR ahead
in Costa Rica, despite the minimal engagement of the Attorney
General (AG) on these issues. Lipman and Covington met with a broad
sampling of stakeholders (including the AG, and Mexican prosecutors,
via a DVC) in order to present a thorough overview of IPR issues.
Specific next steps include: pursuing DOJ-offered training for
judges at Costa Rica's Judicial School, supporting a private sector
alliance for prosecuting IPR crimes, engaging the AG's office on
training opportunities for prosecutors, and encouraging further
collaboration with the GOM and other regional countries on IPR
training and DVC exchanges. END SUMMARY.
------------------------------
SESSIONS WITH THE STAKEHOLDERS
------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) The Lipman/ Covington February 10-14 visit provided us the
opportunity to engage with a variety of stakeholders on IPR issues.
We arranged for meetings with the following institutions/ groups:
-- Judicial Investigative Agency (OIJ, FBI-equivalent);
-- University of Costa Rica;
-- National Registry (similar to USPTO in function);
-- Ministry of Public Security;
-- Judicial School;
-- Judicial branch IP attorneys;
-- Costa Rican Attorney General;
-- a forum of private sector executives;
-- a forum of judicial and legal officials; and
-- a DVC collaboration with Mexican IPR prosecutors (courtesy of
Embassy Mexico City).
¶3. (SBU) Typically, DOJ conducts a training module when it arrives
in country. However, due to the unique IPR circumstances in Costa
Rica -- recently passed legislation as part of CAFTA-DR entry into
force (EIF), an AG independent of the executive branch, and a lax
legal environment (Refs A, B, and C) -- Post and DOJ decided a
series of meetings with stakeholders would generate the best
information and guide overall engagement on IPR and tactics for IPR
training in Costa Rica.
-----------------------
PROFILE OF AN OBSTACLE
----------------------
¶4. (U) As reported in previous Special 301 Reports (Refs A, B, and
C), the office of the Costa Rican AG sits in the judicial branch,
(fiercely) independent of the executive branch. Within the judicial
branch, the President of the Judiciary (the President of the Supreme
Court) has only nominal authority over the office of Attorney
General. Thus, the AG office holder, in this case, Francisco
Dall'Anese, exercises broad powers and exerts independence from the
other branches of government including the judiciary.
¶5. (SBU) Currently, our relations with the AG are cordial and
formal. The formal aspect results from the AG's requirement that
all contact with the office of the AG on any issue, consular,
judicial, anti-drugs, trafficking in persons, IPR, etc., be
channeled through the Director, Office of Technical Assistance and
International Relations, Andrea Murillo. This "gatekeeper" approach
tends to constrain the pace and efficiency of communication.
Dall'Anese was re-elected to a second four-year term in late 2007,
but our contacts speculate that he is unlikely to run for a third
term in 2011.
¶6. (U) Regarding IPR, the AG repeatedly states two issues:
-- the AG's office does not have the resources to pursue IPR crimes
given other priorities, i.e. prosecuting two former Presidents and
organized crime; and
-- the private sector has the resources so it should prosecute IPR
crimes through civil and/or criminal action.
This publicly stated position posed a difficult issue for the GOCR
during CAFTA-DR implementation. The Ministry of Foreign Trade
(COMEX) agreed to USTR's request to establish a special IPR
prosecutor's office, which required then Vice President Laura
Chinchilla (now a presidential candidate) to request the AG to
establish the office. The AG committed to assigning responsibility
for IPR issues to an individual within the Miscellaneous Crimes
unit, but not to setting up a dedicated unit/office per se. Thanks
to USPTO and DOJ training opportunities in late 2008, we were able
to establish relations with the Miscellaneous Crimes issues (through
Director Murillo).
------------------------------------
ALTERNATIVE PATHS AROUND AN OBSTACLE
------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Considering the AG's IPR views and tactics, we designed a
three-point strategy for achieving IPR progress in the short and
long run, which, we hope, will chip away at resistance in the
judiciary.
-- First, invite all relevant components of the judiciary to as many
IPR-related training sessions (USPTO, DOJ, etc.) as possible. In a
conversation with the Ambassador in August 2008, Supreme Court
President Luis Paulino Mora indicated his interest in DOJ training
while affirming that there is a "cultural or reluctance" in Latin
America against IPR prosecution. We will use his interest to help
support our efforts (even if the AG's office is less cooperative at
times);
-- Second, in the interest of broadening the horizons of Costa Rican
prosecutors and attorneys, we contacted other U.S. Embassies in the
region to identify IPR prosecutors/ supporters working on the
frontline of enforcement. During the Lipman/ Covington visit, a DVC
linked Mexican IPR prosecutors (broadcasting from Embassy Mexico)
with Costa Rican prosecutors (broadcasting from Costa Rican
prosecutor's office). The exchange produced an informative
dialogue. In terms of pursuing cases and the formal organization of
IPR within the respective judiciaries, Mexico is certainly ahead of
Costa Rica. As a result of the DVC, Mexico offered to help Costa
Rica with IPR training. (COMMENT: Embassy San Jose thanks Econoff
Joseph Salazar of Embassy Mexico for making the arrangements with
Mexican IPR prosecutors and facilitating the DVC in Embassy Mexico
City. END COMMENT); and
-- Third, the Costa Rican private sector maintains a very different
view of IPR than the AG and believes that innovation must be
protected. During the Lipman/ Covington visit, key officials from
AmCham, the chamber of exporters, the chamber of information and
communications technology, and private law practices met with
Lipman, Covington and Emboffs to advance the idea of the private
sector aggressively pursuing IPR cases through a cooperative
alliance. Cases could be civil or criminal, since Costa Rican law
allows for private parties to pursue criminal cases in loose
cooperation with the AG's office. Such legal actions would
(hopefully) force the judiciary to recognize the importance of IPR
protection to Costa Rican commerce and highlight the issue in the
local media.
¶8. (U) Separate but related to our efforts, COMEX is strongly
supporting the IPR Council, a multi-agency body that meets weekly to
discuss IPR issues. Headed by the Ministry of Justice, the
Council's members include representatives from the Ministries of
Public Security, Science and Technology, and Trade (COMEX); Customs;
the National Registry; the Judicial School; the Judicial
Investigative Agency; and the Fiscal General. Adriana Chaves, a
prosecutor and a recipient of DOJ IPR training in late 2008,
represented the Fiscal General at the most recent meeting.
----------------------------------
GOALS FOR THE SHORT- AND LONG-TERM
----------------------------------
¶9. (SBU) The goals of our three-point IPR strategy (training,
international collaboration, and private sector support) are A) to
better collaborate with the Costa Rican judiciary in a variety of
ways and B) to produce cases for prosecution by way of private
sector pressure and involvement. Since Supreme Court President Mora
in essence requested training assistance, we will provide it, using
USPTO, DOJ, and even other countries in order to keep IPR issues on
the judiciary's radar screen. Meanwhile, the private sector will
mount a "flanking attack" by introducing cases into the court system
which will be heard by some judges with USPTO and/or DOJ training.
In the long run, i.e. post-2011, when Dall'Anese will likely have
left office, we hope that the USG-provided training and the cases
pushed by the private sector will have changed the "culture of
reluctance" sufficiently so that prosecutors and judges will
understand the importance of IPR enforcement and be more willing to
prosecute cases.
---------------
ONE OTHER LEVER
---------------
¶10. (SBU) The USG retains one other lever, of course, in the form
of the Special 301 Report. With the necessary legislation in place,
2009 will be an interesting trial for Costa Rica's IPR resolve. We
hope that the GOCR will make good use of training and collaboration
opportunities this year.
---------
NOW WHAT?
---------
¶11. (U) In the wake of the Lipman/ Covington visit and the Mexican
DVC, Post has several immediate initiatives to pursue:
-- a DOJ training session for judges at the Judicial School (in
June);
-- a meeting of the private sector alliance to outline a plan for
lobbying and for prosecuting IPR crimes. The lobbying campaign
would press the judiciary to prosecute IPR crimes, and the
legislature to approve the yet-to-be passed, IPR-related 14th
CAFTA-DR bill);
-- continued dialogue with the AG's office to determine what type of
training is appropriate for IPR staff prosecutors;
-- provision of DOJ software -- the Real-Time Analytic Intelligence
Database (RAID) application in Spanish -- to the Judicial
Investigative Agency (OIJ) at no cost (COMMENT: Investigative
analysts and document examiners in law enforcement use RAID to
provide document and evidence intelligence in a distributive
computer network environment. END COMMENT); and
-- Mexican training of IPR staff in the office of the AG.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶12. (SBU) Ultimately, we cannot predict how successful our
three-point strategy may be, but it underscores our commitment to
focus Costa Rican attention on the IPR issue. We position our
argument not only as a CAFTA-DR obligation but also as a fundamental
building block to Costa Rican commerce and the arts since innovation
and creativity are the basic ingredients of a flourishing business
and cultural environment. We welcome any change, no matter how
incremental, on the part of the AG regarding IPR enforcement.
However, we also believe that the most progress can be gained by
working around the AG, marking progress with cooperative partners in
the quest of small victories now, while preparing for what we hope
will be a more dramatic, positive shift in the attitude of the
office of the AG in the future.
CIANCHETTE