

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05CALGARY723, IMPERIAL MOVES TO REGULATORY HEARINGS, BUT COMMITMENT TO
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05CALGARY723.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05CALGARY723 | 2005-12-08 19:35 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Consulate Calgary |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
081935Z Dec 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 CALGARY 000723
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/CAN, EB/ESC/ISC, EB/PPD
USDOE FOR IA (DEVITO, PUMPHREY, DEUTSCH)
MOSCOW FOR TOM HUFFAKER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG EPET ETRD PGOV CA
SUBJECT: IMPERIAL MOVES TO REGULATORY HEARINGS, BUT COMMITMENT TO
BUILD MACKENZIE PIPELINE WILL HAVE TO WAIT
REF: OTTAWA 3505
¶1. (SBU) Summary: After months of delay and uncertainty,
Imperial Oil and its partners in the proposed Mackenzie Valley
natural gas pipeline announced in November that they are ready
to move to public hearings. While Imperial claims the
announcement is "not a decision to build a pipeline", the move
represents the first real step forward since Imperial cancelled
preparatory work last spring, and opens the door for the
National Energy Board (NEB) to begin its series of public
hearings with stakeholders in the north. The NEB, in the
meantime, has begun a two week pre-hearing conference in the
Northwest Territories (NWT) that will provide information on the
hearing process as well as information on the NEB's role
throughout the lifecycle of the pipeline. Emphasizing
sensitivities surrounding the project, NEB Chairman Ken Vollman
recently told CG that the board was unable to discuss the
specific "merits" of the project, but offered a general outline
of the process and a timeline for conclusion of the hearings.
In a separate meeting with CG, Imperial Oil's Senior VP
expressed guarded optimism that the Mackenzie project will move
forward. End summary.
--------------------------------------------- --------------
------------------
Imperial Notes Mackenzie's Outstanding "Killer" Concerns
--------------------------------------------- --------------
------------------
¶2. (SBU) CG and Econ Assistant met with Imperial Oil Senior Vice
President Randy Broiles on December 6 to discuss the November 23
announcement that Imperial and its partners in the proposed C$7
billion Mackenzie Valley natural gas pipeline - ConocoPhillips,
ExxonMobil, Shell Canada, and the Aboriginal Pipeline Group
(APG) - are ready to proceed to public hearings and seek
regulatory approval from the Calgary-based National Energy Board
(NEB). Broiles said the announcement is a positive move forward
after partners halted work in April, but noted two "killer"
concerns that remain. Broiles, a native Texan who came on board
with Imperial in July 2005, said he has studied the project for
the last five months describing it as "weak" economically. He
noted that "forward" gas prices are the same today as two to
three years ago, but investment in the project has jumped some
20%-30% during that same time. Costs from contracts, to
equipment, to steel prices have risen, so all cost estimates for
the project have risen accordingly. Broiles also expressed some
concern with respect to the amount of gas reserves from the
three anchor fields (Taglu, Parsons Lake, and Niglintgak) on
which the project is based, suggesting that the reserves may not
be enough to support the 30-inch diameter pipeline, designed to
deliver 1.2 to 1.9 billion cubic feet of gas per day.
¶3. (SBU) Broiles said the second "killer" concern is the
outstanding access and benefits agreements with First Nations
located along the proposed 1220-kilometer route. Broiles said
agreements have been reached with the Inuvialuit (led by former
NWT Premier Nellie Cournoyer and which he describes as the most
business savvy group), the Gwich'In, the Sahtu, the K'ahsho
Got'ine and Tulita/Deline. The holdout in the equation is the
Deh Cho, the only group along the route to not have a potential
ownership stake and which, according to Broiles, is using the
fact that it has no land claim agreement with the federal
government as leverage through which to gain more benefits from
project partners. Broiles pointed out that Ottawa and Imperial
will negotiate simultaneously with the Deh Cho to reach land
claims and benefits agreements, but the land claims agreement
has clearly complicated and delayed dealings with Imperial. Deh
Cho lands cover some 40% of the pipeline's route.
--------------------------------------------- --------------
------
Imperial Welcomes Ottawa's "Fiscal" Assurances
--------------------------------------------- --------------
------
¶4. (SBU) But Broiles noted the developments that helped partners
reach their decision to move forward to the hearing process,
notably the welcome "assurances" partners received from the
federal government. Broiles, who stated that Ottawa has less of
an appetite for taxation and more for royalty changes, described
Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan's recent proposal one of
"preferred profit sharing". Broiles was referring to the
Minister's letter of November 18, which outlined a fiscal and
royalty structure proposal that would, firstly, see Ottawa
accept royalties in kind with a commitment to ship on the
pipeline; in other words, Ottawa would take its cut in gas
rather than cash. Secondly, Ottawa would step in to guarantee
shipping above the current 830 million cubic feet per day that
shippers are comfortable backing. Thirdly, Ottawa would review
a royalty regime where industry pays higher royalties when
volumes of gas and prices are high, and lower royalties if
volumes and prices dip. Lastly, Ottawa would offer to back the
line with federal cash. Broiles had considerable praise for
Minister McLellan stating that, were she to lose her seat in the
upcoming federal election, "she would be missed". Broiles
opined that, should that happen, support for the project would
not change under a Conservative Party government.
¶5. (SBU) Broiles said an "optimistic" timeline for having the
pipeline on-stream would be the end of 2011. Following some 18
months of hearings, construction would commence winter 2007
followed by two more years of winter construction. (As an
aside, Broiles estimates public hearing expenses at some $15-$20
million per month beginning in 2006, given the company's "teams"
(whether environmental and regulatory, etc.) that will be
required to attend each of the NEB and Joint Review Panel (JRP)
hearings throughout the NWT.) Broiles added that, should any
unforeseen information be required by either the NEB or JRP, it
could be enough to delay the project to perhaps give the
proposed Alaska Pipeline project an advantage. While Broiles
thinks that is essentially unlikely, he added it is not
impossible.
¶6. (SBU) On that note, Broiles spoke of the controversy
surrounding the proposed Alaska Pipeline project, including the
federal government's impending decision on whether the Canadian
portion of the line will fall under the jurisdiction of the NEB,
favored by the pipeline's backers: ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil
and BP, or the Northern Pipeline Act (NPA), favored by
Calgary-based TransCanada, which claims route exclusivity under
a 1977 Canada-U.S. treaty. Broiles agreed with CG that the GOC
is waiting for Alaskan officials to resolve fiscal negotiations
with producers before making a decision. That decision will
inevitably be further delayed by the upcoming Canadian federal
election and a possible change in government. Broiles added
that, should the Alaska pipeline proceed before Mackenzie,
"costs will go sky high".
--------------------------------------------- --------------
-------------------
NEB Protects Sensitivity of Mackenzie Valley Public Hearings
--------------------------------------------- --------------
-------------------
¶7. (SBU) CG and Econ Assistant also met with Ken Vollman,
Chairman and Gaetan Caron, Vice Chairman of the NEB on December
2 for a general discussion on the Mackenzie Valley public
hearings. When post first contacted the NEB for an update on
the project, we were told that the NEB could not specifically
discuss its merits, given that the board was about to begin
formal hearings. Vollman explained that two sets of hearings
would be held in "a parallel fashion" beginning January 23,
2006: 1) regulatory hearings by the NEB, and 2) environmental
hearings by the JRP. Vollman noted that regulatory hearings
will address all issues other than environmental, including
questions regarding "adequate gas supply" for the pipeline;
whether contracts are in place; the design of the pipeline and
its size, ie., the current proposal is some 30%-40% larger than
what the natural gas fields can immediately supply; and
permafrost, which Vollman claims is perhaps one of the most
important issues to be addressed given that there is not much
good information currently available on constructing pipelines
that will be laid in a permafrost region. Vollman said he
expects the JRP hearings to be completed and a report sent to
the GOC by the end of 2006. NEB hearings would continue, and
their report would be presented to the GOC by mid-2007.
Following approval and, should the Producers' Group wish to
proceed with the project, construction would commence for the
2007-2008 winter season, as noted above by Imperial.
¶8. (SBU) With respect to the Alaska pipeline and an NPA versus
NEB jurisdiction, Vollman said that is strictly a policy
decision, and the GOC appears prepared to let Alaska "sort their
stuff out" first. Even after a Canadian federal election and a
possible new government, a decision is not likely to be
announced too quickly. That said, Vollman concedes that the
GOC, nevertheless, has been "positioning itself" with respect to
permitting and other administrative issues regarding the
proposal. Both Vollman and Caron agreed that the actual NEB
process would not be affected by movement, one way or the other,
by the Alaska pipeline.
---------------
Comment
---------------
¶9. (SBU) Imperial's recent announcement may not mean a
commitment to build, but all of our interlocutors and industry
observers concede that it is, indeed, positive movement
following last spring's setback. As Randy Broiles noted to us,
a final decision to proceed will not be made by Imperial until
it has had a chance to review the NEB's decision in 2007, the
cost implications of any conditions/requirements implicit in the
report. Tough challenges remain and they are formidable, most
notably the obstacles presented by the lone holdout - the Deh
Cho. While Imperial would have preferred to have all benefits
and access agreements in place before the end of the year, the
company acknowledges that it will likely take the "better part
of a year" to reach a final agreement.
AHMED