

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08OTTAWA311, CANADA: EMBASSY OTTAWA 2008 SPECIAL 301
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08OTTAWA311.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08OTTAWA311 | 2008-02-29 18:07 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO1701
OO RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0311/01 0601807
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 291807Z FEB 08
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7426
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 OTTAWA 000311
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
USTR FOR SULLIVAN, MELLE, GARDA
STATE FOR EEB/IPC (WALLACE) AND WHA/CA (RIOS)
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CA ECON ETRD KIPR
SUBJECT: CANADA: EMBASSY OTTAWA 2008 SPECIAL 301
RECOMMENDATION
REF: A. STATE 09475
¶B. 07 OTTAWA 2230
¶C. 07 OTTAWA 1962
¶D. 07 OTTAWA 1955
¶E. 07 OTTAWA 1764
¶F. 07 OTTAWA 1762
¶G. 07 OTTAWA 1639
¶H. 07 OTTAWA 1243
¶I. 07 OTTAWA 1076
¶J. 07 OTTAWA 887
¶K. 07 OTTAWA 783
¶L. 07 OTTAWA 765
¶M. 07 OTTAWA 691
¶N. 07 OTTAWA 448
¶O. 07 OTTAWA 187
¶P. 07 MONTREAL 150
¶Q. 07 MONTREAL 58
¶R. 07 TORONTO 466
¶S. 07 TORONTO 461
¶T. 07 TORONTO 366
¶U. 07 TORONTO 315
¶V. 07 TORONTO 120
¶W. 07 TORONTO 62
¶X. 07 TORONTO 60
¶Y. 07 TORONTO 45
Sensitive but unclassified. This message is part of an
internal U.S. Government deliberative process regarding the
annual Special 301 Report and must not be shared outside the
USG.
¶1. (sbu) Summary and Recommendation: Embassy Ottawa remains
frustrated by the Government of Canada,s continuing failure
to introduce - let alone pass - major copyright reform
legislation that would, inter alia, implement and ratify the
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Internet
treaties. Several recent factors compound this frustration,
including the fact that:
-- the Prime Minister told the President last August that
Canada would pass copyright legislation;
-- the November Speech from the Throne laying out the
government,s Parliamentary agenda stated that it would
"improve the protection of cultural and intellectual property
rights in Canada, including copyright reform;" and
-- senior GOC officials, especially Industry Minister
Prentice, repeatedly assured the Ambassador and senior
Mission Canada officers that the copyright bill would be
introduced "soon." Specifically, assurances were given that
the legislation had been finalized and would be introduced
prior to the Christmas recess, and then again immediately
upon Parliament's return in January. Neither of which
occurred.
In addition to the lack of Parliamentary action on a revised
copyright bill, the GOC continues to weigh recommendations
from an interagency task force that reviewed "best practices"
and regulations over a three-year period for improving
Canada,s IPR enforcement regime at the border, but has taken
no action so far.
¶2. (sbu) Despite our frustration, we must acknowledge
Canada,s close cooperation with the United States on
intellectual property matters in international fora, as well
as the excellent working relationship between U.S. and
Canadian border entities. In June 2007, the Canadian Royal
Mounted Police (RCMP) hosted the International Law
Enforcement IP Crime Conference in Niagara Falls, and will
co-host this year,s conference in Halifax with Interpol in
June. We also recognize that Canada has taken important
steps to improve protection and enforcement of intellectual
property rights over the last year. Last May, Parliament
enacted a law criminalizing illicit camcording in Canadian
movie theaters - a specific step that the U.S. sought in the
2007 Special 301 report on Canada. Throughout the last year,
Canadian law enforcement entities have carried out a number
of high-profile raids on pirating and counterfeiting
operations. We also believe - even in the face of repeated
delays - that the current government remains committed to
improving IPR protection in Canada.
¶3. (sbu) However, given the continuing failure of the GOC to
introduce a copyright bill into Parliament - coupled with the
apparent lack of significant steps to improve IPR protection
and enforcement along the border - Post reluctantly
Qand enforcement along the border - Post reluctantly
recommends that Canada be elevated to Special 301 Priority
OTTAWA 00000311 002 OF 004
Watch List in 2008. We would strongly recommend retaining
Canada on the Watch List if the Conservative government
introduces its copyright bill into Parliament in the coming
weeks before the release of the 2008 Special 301 report.
(Comment: We understand that elevation of Canada to the
Priority Watch List could adversely affect prospects for the
introduction and passage of a copyright bill in Parliament.
End comment) End Summary and Recommendation.
Copyright Legislation
¶4. (sbu) In December 2007, the GOC completed - and printed
into final bill form - major copyright reform legislation.
While details remain secret, Post understands that the
legislation would implement and ratify the WIPO Internet
Treaties (which Canada signed in 1997), and address Internet
Service Provider liability, circumvention devices,
educational use of copyrighted materials, and other
contentious issues.
¶5. (sbu) From December 2007 to mid-February, senior GOC
officials and well-informed private sector contacts assured
the Embassy that legislative calendar concerns were delaying
the copyright bill,s introduction into Parliament. Our
contacts downplayed the small - but increasingly vocal -
public opposition to copyright reform led by University of
Ottawa law professor Dr. Michael Geist. On February 25,
however, Industry Minister Prentice (please protect) admitted
to the Ambassador that some Cabinet members and Conservative
Members of Parliament - including MPs who won their ridings
by slim margins - opposed tabling the copyright bill now
because it might be used against them in the next federal
election. Prentice said the copyright bill had become a
"political" issue. He also indicated that elevating Canada
to the Special 301 Priority Watch List would make the issue
more difficult and would not be received well.
¶6. (sbu) On February 26, Liberal party leader Stephan Dion
made clear that his opposition party would not bring down the
minority Conservative government over the just-unveiled 2008
budget. Most political observers now believe that Dion,s
position pushes possible national elections until at least
the fall of 2008, and possibly even until October 2009 (the
next mandatory date). A senior GOC official told the
Ambassador on February 27 that the disappearing prospect of
an imminent election should make it easier to introduce the
copyright bill in Parliament, but offered no definitive
timetable for doing so. An influential Liberal MP on
intellectual property issues separately told EMIN on February
26 that the copyright bill would receive widespread support
from the Conservative, Liberal, and Bloc Quebecois parties if
and when the GOC sends it to Parliament. (Comment: James
Rajotte - chair of the Industry Committee, which would likely
receive a copyright bill - told the Ambassador on February 28
that the legislation would not have such smooth sailing. End
Comment) The Liberal MP stated that he has pressed Industry
Minister Prentice to release the legislation now, adding that
Canada is out of step with the rest of the (developed) world
on intellectual property rights and risks losing future
foreign investment. The MP dismissed the political
significance of the public efforts of Professor Geist and
hinted that Canada,s possible elevation to the Priority
Watch list would not be seen as a hostile U.S. action, but
show that its IPR regime is weak vis-a-vis its G-7 partners.
The MP indicated that other nations, especially France, are
also lobbying Parliament on a copyright bill. EMIN learned
Qalso lobbying Parliament on a copyright bill. EMIN learned
from his French Embassy counterpart that she would be
briefing Parliamentarians on this issue on March 4. Industry
Committee chair Rajotte separately confirmed this meeting
with the Ambassador.
¶7. (sbu) On February 27, EMIN and Econcouns were summoned to
Foreign Affairs Canada to receive the informal views of the
Canadian government on the Special 301 process. The meeting
was chaired by Doug George, the Director of DFAIT,s
Intellectual Property office and included representatives of
ten Canadian government agencies, including Industry Canada,
Canadian Heritage, Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), and
the Canadian Embassy in Washington. After the usual
denouncement of the Special 301 process (which we hear every
year), George outlined the cooperative measures that Canada
undertakes with USG agencies and Interpol on IPR enforcement.
He stated that this cooperation, together with Canada,s
federal and local law enforcement efforts, gets short shrift
in USTR,s description of Canada in the Special 301 report.
¶8. (sbu) However, George and Industry Canada,s Susan
Bincoletto could not give EMIN any indication of when the
OTTAWA 00000311 003 OF 004
revised copyright bill would appear in Parliament. CBSA did
not know whether the C$75 million announced in the recent
budget over the next two years will be targeted toward
improving IPR enforcement. There was also no indication as
to when CBSA officials would get "ex officio" powers to
improve their enforcement efforts even though many Canadian
officials believe that this is needed. Finally, George
cautioned that if Canada were retained on the 301 Watch List
- or even elevated to the Priority Watch List - it could
affect future Canadian cooperation on IPR as well as give
ammunition to Dr. Geist and his acolytes, who see a revised
copyright bill as a "U.S. plot." In answer to EMIN,s
question, George claimed that only the United States is
pressing Canada on copyright reform. The EU, individual
European countries, and Japan do raise IPR issues, but George
implied that these efforts are perfunctory.
IPR Enforcement
¶9. (sbu) After three years of examining "best practices" and
regulations for improving IPR enforcement on Canada,s
borders, an interagency group made formal recommendations to
Canadian ministers in the fall of 2007. To date, the GOC has
yet to act on the recommendations, and the 2008 budget
(released on February 26) contained no apparent IPR-related
enforcement measures. In the past, GOC officials have
indicated that Canada should join the other G-7 countries in
updating its border enforcement regime and that border
officials should receive "ex officio" powers to seize
suspected counterfeit and pirated goods. Current
arrangements between customs officials and the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) for seizing suspected illegal goods are
cumbersome and relatively ineffective.
¶10. (sbu) Notably, the RCMP has increased its attention on
counterfeit and pirated goods,particularly relating to public
safety, health, and organized crime. Last June, the RCMP
hosted the International Law Enforcement IP Crime Conference
in Niagara Falls that was well attended by officials from the
United States and other countries. This year,s conference
in Halifax will be co-hosted by the RCMP and Interpol, June
24-26. In addition, Canadian law enforcement officials are
boosting action against illegal pirating and counterfeiting
operations. These illustrative 2007 examples are excerpted
from a more exhaustive list compiled by ConGen Toronto:
-- Toronto RCMP investigators seize pirated DVD copies of the
East Indian World Premiere movie Guru. Unauthorized copies
of the movie,s soundtrack and another popular East Indian
film also seized (February 21);
-- An Ontario husband and wife are arrested after police
officers seize over 750 counterfeit DVD,s at two convenience
stores with an estimated value of C$15,000 (March 5);
-- Windsor RCMP officers charge three men with 22 counts of
importing counterfeit goods. Examination of the goods reveal
23 different brand-name products with a value of C$250,000
(April 2);
-- In connection with satellite signal theft, Durham police
seize C$60,000 worth of satellite receivers, dishes, and
computer equipment. Estimated annual lost revenue lost is
C$240,000 (July 13);
-- Toronto police seize more than 20,000 music CDs along with
movies, video games, and equipment after a six-month
investigation initiated by the Canadian Recording Industry
Association. Police also seize cash, business documents, and
four CD/DVD burning towers, each with 6-8 burners, capable of
producing some 770 recorded discs per hour, or 30,720 discs
Qproducing some 770 recorded discs per hour, or 30,720 discs
in a 40-hour week (July 17);
-- Ontario police raid twenty-two locations in Mississauga,
Brampton, Burlington and Toronto, arresting 18 people and
seizing over 40,000 pirated DVD movies worth an estimated
C$800,000 as well as manufacturing equipment capable of
producing C$21 million worth of pirated DVD movies per year
(August 21);
-- RCMP and the York police officers search eight stores at
the Pacific Mall in Markham and two retail outlets and a
storage unit in the Dynasty Mall in Toronto. Several arrests
are made, and more than 15,000 DVD,s seized. Also seized
are 65 DVD burners located at a private residence (August
31); and
-- Toronto police recover C$10 million worth of counterfeit
OTTAWA 00000311 004 OF 004
luxury merchandise in a series of raids on local retailers
(December 3).
Canada Moves Against Camcording
¶11. (sbu) In June 2007, the government criminalized the act
of recording ("camcording") a movie in a theater without
consent of the theater manager. The legislation was broadly
supported by all political parties, and moved through
Parliament in less than a month. Several individuals have
been arrested under the new law and are currently pending
trial. Industry representatives have told Post that the
problem of illicit camcording in Canada - which was cited in
the 2007 Special 301 Report - has been significantly reduced
by this new law.
Pharmaceutical Concern
¶12. (sbu) The U.S. pharmaceutical industry remains generally
pleased with the October 2006 amendments to Canada,s data
protection regulations, and considers them a significant step
forward. Some U.S.-based pharmaceutical companies, however,
have raised concerns that recent judicial and Health Canada
decisions could be putting a number of existing drug patents
at risk. The U.S.-based companies believe that a further
regulatory change allowing them the Right of Appeal of an
adverse administrative decision would help alleviate their
concerns. Post understands that a proposed regulatory
amendment addressing this issue may soon be published in the
Canada Gazette for public comment.
Recommendation: No Copyright Bill Equals Special 301
Priority Watch List
¶13. (sbu) We believe that the minority Conservative
government is committed to improving the protection and
enforcement of intellectual property rights. However, given
the GOC,s failure so far to introduce a copyright reform
bill in Parliament - and the lack of significant steps to
strengthen IPR enforcement and protection on the border - the
Embassy reluctantly recommends that Canada be elevated to
Special 301 Priority Watch List. We would strongly recommend
retaining Canada on the Watch List if the government
introduces its copyright bill into the House of Commons
before the end of April. (Comment: Elevation of Canada to
the Priority Watch List could adversely affect prospects for
the introduction and passage of a copyright bill in
Parliament. End comment)
¶14. (sbu) This cable and its recommendation have been
reviewed and approved by the Ambassador.
Visit Canada,s Economy and Environment Forum at
http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/can ada
WILKINS