

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06SANJOSE280, NEW LAW STRENGTHENS COSTA RICAN IMMIGRATION
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06SANJOSE280.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 SAN JOSE 000280
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR CA/OCS/ACS/WHA; WHA/CEN FOR JMACK; CA/OCS/CI
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CASC KFRD CS
SUBJECT: NEW LAW STRENGTHENS COSTA RICAN IMMIGRATION
AUTHORITY
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (SBU) On October 27, 2005 the Legislative Assembly
approved a draft law that criminalizes alien smuggling;
increases fines on airlines carrying passengers without
correct documentation; and fines individuals who aid, abet,
harbor, transport, and/or employ illegal migrants. After
nearly four years of political debate, the law is expected
to reduce illegal immigration. The new legislation will
come into effect on August 12, 2006. Human rights
organizations have spoken out vigorously about the law's
"draconian anti-human rights measures." It remains to be
seen whether the General Migration Directorate will receive
the resources needed to conduct the patrols and
investigations necessary to execute its new authority. END
SUMMARY.
-----------------------------
New Law In Effect Next August
-----------------------------
¶2. The last legislation on immigration was enacted in 1986
and it continues to serve as the country's migration law. It
does not criminalize human smuggling. The rise in smuggling
and illegal immigration was a major impetus in the decision
to draft new legislation four years ago. The President of
Costa Rica heartily supported the bill, emphasizing that it
would improve citizen security, reduce exploitation of
immigrants, and improve the GOCR's ability to collect social
security taxes. In a January 6, 2006 meeting, General
Migration Directorate Director Johnny Marin told ConOff that
the bill is a watershed in updating the law to reflect the
reality of Costa Rica's current migration trends. He
pointed out that the new law clearly articulates a
comprehensive migration policy that is focused on three
issues: public security, integration of foreigners who are
already living in Costa Rica, and preventing future waves of
immigrants. The full text of the law is available on-line
at: http://www.asamblea.go.cr/
¶3. Marin commented to ConOff that several issues in the new
law need to be developed further in future legislation. He
noted that the three pillars of the new migration policy are
going to be hard to implement. Marin shared that, due to
lack of political will, several important issues remain
untouched, such as the sections of the law which deal with
the amount of monthly income foreigners must show to obtain
status as residents in the country and the rules regarding
transmission of residency via marriage. He explained that
legislators are reluctant to attempt any changes to the bill
after the four long years of work it took to pass the
current version.
¶4. The new law states that foreigners who wish to obtain
legal permanent resident status as a "pensioner" must
demonstrate that they receive a minimum monthly pension of
USD 600 (Article 77). The law for retirees with no pension
seeking such status is contradictory. Article 77 states
they must show a "stable and permanent income from abroad"
in the amount of USD 1,000. However, Article 79 states that
retirees without a pension must demonstrate a "permanent and
stable income from abroad" in the amount of USD 2,000.
Marin himself pointed out this contradiction to ConOff, and
expressed his frustration that the paradox was not resolved
before the law was passed. He attributed the fact that the
amounts were not increased to efforts made by the
Libertarian legislators and an influential retirees
association.
--------------------------------------------- --------
New Smuggling Sanctions May Help U.S. Border Security
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶5. The new migration law explicitly criminalizes the
"illicit smuggling of people" for the first time in Costa
Rica. Marin commented to ConOff that this is one of the
strongest planks for getting tough on illegal migration.
The new law punishes "the transport of persons" with the
"intent to illicitly smuggle" them "into or out of the
country" by "evading established migratory controls or
utilizing false data or documents" with two to six years of
incarceration. The same punishment applies to persons who,
"with the intent to illicitly smuggle humans," "house, hide,
or conceal foreigners who enter or remain illegally in the
country." The punishment is increased by a third when the
individual involved is a government employee, or when minors
are involved in the smuggling process, whether as
accomplices or as victims (Article 245). The new law
stipulates that any foreigner who has entered the country
without following the proper procedures and is in the
country without the necessary legal documents may avoid
deportation if the person opts to press charges against
those individuals involved in their illegal entry and if
they cooperate with local authorities in the ensuing
investigation.
--------------------------------------------- -----------
Enhanced Sanctions For Complicity With Illegal Migration
--------------------------------------------- -----------
¶6. The new Migration Law has stiffer and more detailed
penalties for individuals who aid, abet, harbor, transport,
and/or employ illegal migrants. Director Marin pointed out
to ConOff that the 1986 legislation had only one section
that encompassed all regulations regarding "international
transport" issues. The new law has expanded this into four
sections, dealing with maritime, air, and land transport
separately, as well as a section that addresses "general
norms." Marin expressed confidence that the new law will
provide the Migration Department with expanded oversight and
investigative authority that should help cut down
significantly on the illegal flow of people and goods,
provided that staffing levels and resources are adequately
funded.
¶7. International transport companies will now be
responsible for presenting travel documents of each
passenger and crewmember, along with passenger lists
(Article 150). Sea vessels must present this information
eight days prior to arriving at a Costa Rican port (Article
157).
¶8. The new law prevents any boat from sailing or any plane
from taking off prior to receiving formal approval from the
Migration Directorate that all individuals on board comply
with migration requirements (Articles 158 and 161). Failure
to comply with this rule will result in administrative
proceedings being taken against the port's captain or the
air traffic controller for "grave error in exercising his
duties." The Migration Directorate will also be able to
board ships to conduct migratory checks of the passengers
either in port or while the boat is in national or
international waters. All inspection costs will be covered
by the maritime vessel involved (Articles 160 and 161).
¶9. The Migration Directorate will now be able to prevent
the entry or exit of any ground transport, national or
international, which is carrying individuals who do not
comply with migratory requirements. The Directorate will
also be able to detain vehicles for the time necessary to
ensure that all passengers comply with these requirements.
¶10. Any person representing an international transport
company whose vehicle, plane, or boat enters the country
with foreigners not in compliance with migration
requirements can be fined three to twelve times the base
monthly salary established by law. This fine can also be
applied to any foreigner who remains in Costa Rica after the
departure of the vessel by which he entered the country.
Repeat offenders in either of these areas may be subject to
administrative proceedings involving formal charges
(Articles 168 and 169). These are new sanctions that do not
appear in the existing migration legislation. Current law
states that international transport companies can be fined
$30-$45 for each person who enters the country via their
company and who is not in compliance with migration
requirement or who remains behind after the departure of the
vessel by which they entered the country (Articles 103 and
105 of 1986 legislation). The new law will also hold
transport companies financially responsible for all costs
involved with foreigners who remain in the country while
their status (whether they can stay or must leave the
country) is being determined (Article 153).
¶11. The new bill increases the sanctions against
individuals who harbor and/or employ illegal migrants
(Articles 173 and 178) from two to twelve times the minimum
monthly salary.
--------------------------------------------- ----------
New Law Criticized For Alleged Human Rights Infractions
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶12. Several entities involved with migration issues have
expressed concern about the law. Presidential candidate
Oscar Arias unsuccessfully asked the President to veto the
bill due to his concerns that it could lead to abuse of
illegal immigrants. The Human Rights Ombudsman's office,
the Catholic Church, and the U.N. High Commission for
Refugees (UNHCR) also expressed strong reservations about
the law. The Human Rights Ombudsman's Office (an
independent entity within the GOCR) was worried that there
is no system of checks and balances in place; the new law
gives General Migration Directorate final authority on
several matters. Article 220 of the new law states that
decisions made by the Migration Department to deny a visa,
refuse entry, or deport an individual cannot be appealed.
However, Migration Department Director Marin pointed out to
ConOff that the law does allow for appeals in some
circumstances; Article 219 cites five specific instances in
which appeals to the Migration Directorate's decision can be
made regarding the status of foreigners who are already
legally in the country.
¶13. The Catholic Church was concerned about measures that
would mete out jail sentences to individuals assisting
undocumented labor migrants. The Church succeeded in
getting the language changed such that individuals can
provide humanitarian assistance to undocumented migrants
without fear of going to jail. The UNHCR is worried that
the internationally accepted definition of refugee is not
used in the text, and key articles dealing with the
treatment and status of refugees (Articles 108 and 113) use
definitions created by the Legislative Assembly as opposed
to the internationally recognized terms. When asked about
the motive for this decision, Migration Department Director
Marin explained that one legislator decided it was pointless
to repeat definitions that had already been used in the
Geneva conventions to which Costa Rica is a party, so he
decided to craft his own. (Note: Marin expressed
frustration at the many thousands of Colombians in Costa
Rica with refugee status. It appeared that he supported the
narrower definitions included in the law; he said it is the
GOCR's right to establish whatever refugee definitions are
appropriate for Costa Rica. End Note.)
¶14. A spokesperson for the International Organization of
Migration (IOM) commented in a recent press interview that
the law does not adhere to standards set out in the U.N.
Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in
Persons. The Public Security Ministry responded that the
new legislation "complements international agreements
signed, ratified, and in force in Costa Rica." (Note: The
U.N. Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking
in Persons was ratified by Costa Rica on September 9, 2003
and entered into force on December 25, 2003. End Note.)
¶15. After four years of debate in the legislature, the
Constitutional Court also weighed in, providing suggestions
to modify an area of the law that, in the Court's view,
contained potential Constitutional shortcomings. On July
21, 2005, the Court issued an opinion stating that paragraph
one of Article 67, aimed at reducing marriage fraud as a
means of obtaining citizenship, was unconstitutional. The
law's draft language stated that the Costa Rican citizen in
the marriage would have to prove the union's legitimacy by
having lived overseas for a year with a foreign spouse. The
Court pointed out that the GOCR could not require a citizen
to live outside of his country on any grounds. The bill's
text was changed to eliminate this constitutional weakness.
Marin expressed his frustration to ConOff regarding the new
law's inability to outlaw marriages by proxy in which
foreigners are able to marry Costa Ricans and be in full
compliance with all the current requirements for residency
without having ever met their spouse. He explained that
Chinese and Cuban citizens widely abuse the current
loopholes in the system to gain Costa Rican citizenship.
--------------------------------------------- -
Funding Uncertain for New Law's Implementation
--------------------------------------------- -
¶16. Marin declined to comment directly on funding issues,
but candidly pointed out that his research indicates he
needs at least 300 more staff to carry out the new mandate
adequately. He stated that the Migration Directorate will
need "international dollars" to implement the new
legislation correctly. Marin added that due to payments on
the national debt, the Migration Directorate only receives
one-third of its allocated budget. He explained that
several key border posts lack the most basic tools, such as
vehicles, to investigate reported cases of illegal migration
and lawyers on staff who know the law and can build a case.
He mentioned that in San Jose alone, there are over 500
pending immigration investigations that are not attended to
due to lack of resources. Marin explained that some border-
crossings close at 4:30p.m., and that anyone who wants to
can easily cross over after the officials have gone home for
the evening.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶17. It appears that the challenge facing the migration law
is whether the GOCR has the political will and financial
resources to enforce it. It remains to be seen how the
implementing legislation, which is scheduled to be presented
to the newly elected President this summer, will be received
by the new administration. If the GOCR is successful in
eking out the required funds from its already cash-strapped
budget to fully enforce the new law, Nicaraguans who used to
come to Costa Rica looking for work may now start going
elsewhere, presumably north.
LANGDALE