

Currently released so far... 12900 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AE
ASEC
AS
AR
AMGT
AFIN
AORC
AU
AG
AF
APER
ABLD
ADCO
ABUD
AM
AID
AJ
AEMR
AMED
AL
ASUP
AN
AIT
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
AA
AGMT
AINF
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AY
AADP
ARF
ACS
AGR
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
APEC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
ACAO
ASEAN
ADM
AGAO
AND
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
AROC
APCS
AORG
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AZ
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
BR
BO
BA
BM
BL
BH
BK
BEXP
BILAT
BTIO
BF
BU
BD
BY
BE
BG
BB
BBSR
BT
BRUSSELS
BP
BX
BC
BIDEN
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CA
CS
CO
CD
CR
CPAS
CDG
CI
CDC
CBW
CU
CVIS
CE
CONS
CH
CMGT
CASC
CY
CW
CG
CJAN
CIDA
CODEL
CWC
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CL
CACS
CIC
CHR
CAPC
CM
CT
CTR
COM
CROS
CN
COPUOS
CV
CF
CARSON
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
CYPRUS
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EFIN
ECON
ETRD
EAID
EC
EU
EUN
EINV
EG
ETTC
EIND
ELAB
EAGR
ECIN
EINT
ENRG
EFIS
ELTN
EAIR
EPET
EZ
ET
ENERG
ECPS
EWWT
EI
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ER
ES
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ECINECONCS
ELN
EFTA
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ESA
EPA
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUR
ECUN
EXIM
EK
EUREM
ECONOMY
EUMEM
ERNG
EFINECONCS
EAIDS
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
IQ
IR
IS
IN
IA
IC
IZ
ICRC
ID
IDA
IT
IO
IAEA
ICJ
ICAO
IV
IBRD
IMF
IAHRC
IWC
ILO
ISLAMISTS
IGAD
ILC
ITU
ITF
INRA
INRO
ICTY
INRB
ITALY
IBET
IL
INTELSAT
ISRAELI
IMO
IDP
ICTR
ITRA
IRC
IRAQI
IEFIN
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
ISRAEL
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
IACI
INDO
KPAO
KMDR
KCOR
KNNP
KJUS
KCRM
KDEM
KVPR
KTFN
KPRP
KTIP
KSCA
KSUM
KTEX
KIDE
KIRF
KV
KTIA
KN
KG
KFRD
KWMN
KUNR
KISL
KU
KGHG
KPKO
KOMS
KPAL
KIPR
KMCA
KOMC
KRVC
KSEP
KAWC
KOLY
KWBG
KACT
KFLO
KHIV
KZ
KGIC
KBCT
KDRG
KBTR
KCFE
KE
KHLS
KMPI
KAWK
KPWR
KIRC
KRAD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFLU
KPLS
KRIM
KSTH
KDDG
KPRV
KICC
KS
KSAF
KBIO
KREC
KCGC
KCIP
KTDB
KWAC
KPAI
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFSC
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KMIG
KVRP
KNEI
KGIT
KNSD
KHDP
KSAC
KWMM
KR
KCOM
KAID
KENV
KVIR
KHSA
KO
KCRS
KPOA
KTER
KFIN
KSPR
KTBT
KX
KCMR
KMOC
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KOCI
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KPIR
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
MARR
MOPS
MUCN
MCAP
MNUC
MEPP
MTCRE
MASS
MO
MIL
MX
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MTCR
MK
MG
MA
MY
MU
ML
MPS
MW
MD
MARAD
MC
MR
MT
MTRE
MASC
MRCRE
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MASSMNUC
NI
NZ
NL
NO
NPT
NATO
NS
NU
NP
NPA
NSFO
NDP
NT
NW
NASA
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NG
NATIONAL
NSSP
NV
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NPG
NR
NGO
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NSC
OIIP
OPRC
OTRA
OEXC
OREP
OSCE
OVIP
OPAD
OBSP
OECD
OFFICIALS
OAS
OPDC
ODIP
OPCW
OES
OFDP
OPIC
OCS
OIC
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
ODC
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PINR
PGOV
PARM
PE
PTER
PHUM
PO
PINS
PREF
PK
PM
POL
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PAS
PA
PL
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PROP
PP
PINL
PBT
PTBS
PG
PINF
PRL
PALESTINIAN
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICS
POLICY
PROV
PBIO
PREO
PAO
PDOV
PGOF
POV
PCI
PRAM
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PJUS
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
RU
RS
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RO
RW
RCMP
RSO
RP
RM
ROOD
RFE
RICE
ROBERT
RSP
RF
RELATIONS
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
SENV
SY
SNAR
SCUL
SP
SF
SW
SOCI
SU
SMIG
SO
SA
SR
SZ
SI
SC
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SK
SH
SNARCS
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SG
SL
SYRIA
SIPRS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SWE
SYR
SEN
SCRS
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SENVKGHG
SANC
SHI
SHUM
TU
TSPA
TBIO
TS
TRGY
TINT
TPHY
TN
TW
TH
TZ
TSPL
TP
TBID
TI
TF
TD
TT
TNGD
TL
TC
THPY
TIP
TX
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
TR
UK
UNSC
UNGA
UNESCO
UNHRC
UP
UN
USTR
US
UNDC
UY
UNICEF
UNDP
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNCHC
UNCSD
USOAS
UNFCYP
UG
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
UNEP
USEU
UZ
UNCND
USUN
UNCHR
USNC
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05HELSINKI988, FINLAND'S PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES SPAR OVER
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05HELSINKI988.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05HELSINKI988 | 2005-09-16 07:51 | 2011-04-24 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Helsinki |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HELSINKI 000988
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV MARR FI NATO
SUBJECT: FINLAND'S PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES SPAR OVER
SECURITY ISSUES
REF: HELSINKI 920
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED - PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY.
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The unofficial opening rounds of
Finland's presidential campaign appear to indicate that
European and trans-Atlantic security issues could become
central themes. Conservative Party candidate Niinisto
has advocated that Finland embrace European security
guarantee mechanisms and downplayed NATO membership,
although his remarks may represent mere rhetoric designed
to spark debate, and not deeply held views. Center Party
presidential candidate (and PM) Vanhanen has
emphasized that the U.S. remains crucial to European
security, but has stopped short of advocating NATO
membership for Finland. President Halonen -- whose status
as incumbent and a lead of nearly 40 points in the polls
have allowed her to remain largely above the fray -- has
stated that Finland's current security posture requires no
realignment. The views of outside commentators vary
widely. However, most share our opinion that the major
candidates' positions differ only slightly, and that any
real action on security policy will emerge not from
January's presidential election, but rather from the
parliamentary election scheduled for March 2007. End
Summary.
Niinisto's Working Vacation
---------------------------
¶2. (U) Although Finland's presidential campaign does not
begin officially until November, an unofficial "pre-
campaign" appeared to begin in August and brought with it
several notable exchanges on European and trans-Atlantic
security issues. The early start to the political season
was prompted in large part by Conservative Party (Cons)
Candidate Sauli Niinisto, who used his two months of summer
vacation from his current post as vice-president of the
European Investment Bank in Luxemburg to return home,
launch his campaign, and begin delineating how his platform
will differ from his major rivals. In addition to being
resident in Luxembourg, Niinisto is the only one of the
three major-party candidates who does not currently hold
elected office. This lack of a bully pulpit leaves him at
a disadvantage vis-a-vis his two principle rivals,
incumbent President Tarja Halonen, a Social Democrat (SDP),
and Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen, the Center Party's
presidential candidate.
¶3. (SBU) According to his aides, Niinisto sought to open an
early debate on security issues because he believed that
neither Halonen nor Vanhanen was taking a leadership role.
He has publicly advocated that Finland embrace the European
security guarantees as outlined in the now-stalled EU
Constitution Treaty. In addition, Niinisto has accused the
Vanhanen government of a sort of flip-flop -- that is,
first opposing the European guarantees, then embracing them
when they became part of the EU Constitution Treaty, then
once again abandoning them after the French and Dutch "non"
votes. As for NATO, Niinisto has downplayed Finnish
membership in public, recognizing that voters strongly
favor maintaining Finland's traditional policy of
nonalignment. When pressed in private, Niinisto remained
noncommittal, even to the suggestion of European security
guarantees possibly being a step toward NATO membership
(see reftel). His stance puts him somewhat at odds with
many others in the Conservative Party, which is not of one
mind on NATO but historically has tended to favor Finland's
membership. For example, the Conservative Party Chairman,
Jyrki Katainen, has been a steady proponent of eventual
Finnish accession. Indeed, many observers -- including
some Conservatives -- contend that Niinisto's public views
represent rhetoric designed to spark debate and distinguish
himself from other candidates, rather than deeply held
personal beliefs.
Vanhanen Responds
-----------------
¶4. (U) Candidate Vanhanen has responded publicly by
emphasizing the importance of the United States to European
security. In a recent speech to Center Party activists and
Parliamentarians, Vanhanen highlighted the "historic
commitment of North America" to European defense and said
that Finland should do its part to "make sure that U.S.
interest in Europe and its defense survives." He argued
that seeking to turn the EU into a military alliance is "
not on the horizon" and that "no overlapping or competing
security solutions should be built between Europe and the
United States." The PM stopped short of advocating
that Finland join NATO, but did note his government
supported keeping "the option of NATO membership" open for
discussion.
¶5. (SBU) Privately, Vanhanen's camp has been even more
explicit. His chief of staff, Riisto Volanen, has
repeatedly emphasized to us that, of the three major party
candidates, Vanhanen is the strongest advocate of trans-
Atlantic cooperation. Niinisto's recent public remarks on
EU security cooperation demonstrated that Niinisto viewed
European guarantees as more important for Finland than the
trans-Atlantic relationship -- and perhaps even a
substitute, Volanen added. He also said that he expected
the issue to figure prominently in the campaign and, in
fact, the PM has continued to reiterate the importance of
trans-Atlantic ties at many of his public engagements.
Nevertheless, even Volanen would not go so far as to
suggest that NATO membership itself will become a campaign
issue. NATO is a very touchy subject for Finnish
voters, and Vanhanen -- who may have the most to lose
politically should he fare poorly in the upcoming
election -- cannot afford to lose votes over it. (Vanhanen
currently trails Niinisto by two percentage points
in recent polls.)
The President: A Safe Distance
------------------------------
¶6. (SBU) For the most part , President Halonen has appeared
happy to allow her two main rivals to do most of the
sparring on security issues. Halonen enjoys a tremendous
lead in the polls -- a position of strength which has
allowed her to weigh on issues when it suits her. (The
most recent Finnish Gallup poll indicates that if elections
were held now, Halonen would take 58 percent, enough for a
first round win.) That said, some on the left have quietly
expressed concerns that Halonen needs to become more vocal
on security issues and that she cannot afford to allow
Vanhanen and Niinisto to dictate the tenor of the
discussion. Perhaps as a result, Halonen has recently
begun advocating both continued progress on European
security guarantees (despite the setbacks on the
Constitution Treaty) and support for trans-Atlantic
partnership in a series of characteristically positive
public comments. Halonen -- like Vanhanen -- opposes NATO
membership for Finland in the short term, but has not ruled
it out as an eventual possibility. However, unlike the
Prime Minister, Halonen sees the NATO discussion as largely
theoretical and clearly favors non-alignment; Vanhanen, on
the other hand, appears more inclined to believe that, at
some point, Finland may actually join NATO. In any case,
Halonen has sought to de-emphasize the issue altogether,
emphasizing that "in our current external environment,
nothing has happened that would call for any new decision"
on Finland's overall security stance.
Other Comments
--------------
¶7. (SBU) The candidates' sparring has, of course, prompted
a wide range of other commentators to weigh in on the
security debate. Max Jakobson, a former senior diplomat
and perhaps Finland's most respected foreign
policy commentator, declared that "the EU cannot be relied
on as a defense policy player" and that Finland must join
NATO "before there is an emergency." (Unfortunately,
Jakobson's pleas have fallen on deaf ears; only one
candidate -- Henrik Lax, of the small Swedish Peoples Party
-- openly advocates NATO membership.) Others have
commented on how any changes in Finnish policy might affect
relations with Russia, the EU or the U.S.; on whether
Finland suffers a security "deficit" or a security
"surplus;" and, of course, on the fact that, to most
voters, the candidates' positions really differ very little
from one another.
Our Comment
-----------
¶8. (SBU) It is valid to question whether or not the
candidates' positions are ultimately all that different in
the eyes of a Finnish electorate that still jealously
defends the notion of Finnish nonalignment and opposes
NATO membership by an 80 to 20 percent margin. For U.S.
observers, the more important question might be whether any
candidate, once in office, can muster the political
momentum necessary to effect a real change in Finnish
security policy. All acknowledge that the right leader
with the right message might be able to sell the Finns on
NATO membership, yet ironies abound: Halonen, who will
likely win, would no doubt prefer that NATO membership
remain an academic discussion for the six years of her
second term. However, influential figures within her SDP
party (including former PM Paavo Lipponen) are beginning to
quietly suggest that NATO membership must be put on the
table sooner rather than later. Niinisto's Conservative
party is the most inclined of the big three to support NATO
membership, but the candidate himself has de-emphasized
NATO in favor of European security guarantees. And
Vanhanen, the most open to NATO, faces his own Center
party, the bulk of which is steadfastly against Finland's
joining NATO. In the end, any major security policy
changes will depend more on what type of coalition enters
government after the March 2007 parliamentary election --
and on whether the new prime minister and the president
elected this January together can provide the right
leadership and the right message to counter public
skepticism.
MACK