

Currently released so far... 12646 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AEMR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
ACOA
ASIG
AADP
AGR
ANET
ADPM
AMCHAMS
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BT
BP
BX
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CR
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CFED
CODEL
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CARSON
COPUOS
CIA
CL
CN
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
EPET
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
ENIV
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ENVR
ESENV
ENNP
ERNG
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
EXIM
ELECTIONS
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IT
IO
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IDP
IGAD
ILC
ITRA
ICTR
ITU
IBET
ITF
INRA
INRO
INTELSAT
IEFIN
IRC
IRAQI
ITALY
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INRB
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KSEP
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KIRF
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KSEO
KVPR
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KO
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCGC
KVIR
KFSC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KX
KMFO
KR
KMOC
KRIM
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KPAI
KICA
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MARAD
MG
MTRE
MASC
MW
MRCRE
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NGO
NR
NATIONAL
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OECD
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PDOV
PHUMPGOV
PCI
PTBS
PEL
PG
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
POGOV
POV
PRAM
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PMIL
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PRL
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
ROOD
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SPCE
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SNARCS
SH
SAARC
STEINBERG
SG
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SWE
SHI
SEN
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
TF
THPY
TP
TBID
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UNMIK
UY
UNCHR
UNO
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCND
UNCHC
UNCSD
USUN
USOAS
UNFCYP
USNC
UNIDROIT
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09PARIS264, S/WCI AMBASSADOR WILLIAMSON DISCUSSES GUANTANAMO
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PARIS264.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09PARIS264 | 2009-02-20 16:53 | 2010-11-30 16:30 | SECRET//NOFORN | Embassy Paris |
VZCZCXYZ0009
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHFR #0264/01 0511653
ZNY SSSSS ZZH (CCY AD3230EB MSI1033-695)
O 201653Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5580
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
S E C R E T PARIS 000264
NOFORN
SIPDIS
C O R R E C T E D COPY CAPTION
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/19/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL MOPS PTER PHUM KAWK KISL KPAO FR
SUBJECT: S/WCI AMBASSADOR WILLIAMSON DISCUSSES GUANTANAMO
BAY DETAINEES WITH FRENCH OFFICIALS
REF: A. SECSTATE 6516
¶B. PARIS 00119
¶C. PARIS 02016
¶D. VILNIUS 88
Classified By: POL MC Kathleen H. Allegrone for reasons 1.4 (B & D).
¶1. (S/NF) SUMMARY: S/WCI Ambassador Williamson met with
French MFA officials on February 16 to discuss detainee
issues, France's role in the EU process and possible
resettlement of Guantanamo Bay detainees in France.
Williamson noted that France has a unique role to play in
formulating a process within the European Union (EU) to
accept detainees and helping assuage the concerns of member
states that might stymie EU consensus on the issue. Foreign
Ministry Director of Communications and spokesman Eric
Chevallier reiterated France's willingness to assist the U.S.
on this issue (ref b and c), but noted that the GOF position
was "very clear": detainees would be reviewed on a
case-by-case basis; the detainee had to specifically request
resettlement in France; and France would need full
information on interested detainees to review any security
and judicial implications. Chevallier said the GOF supports
an open EU process that would allow decisions to be made on a
national basis, similar to what current EU president the
Czech Republic has proposed. The most important issue, he
said, would be addressing concerns among Schengen countries.
Williamson said the U.S. is aware of the complexities of the
Schengen issue and pledges to work with EU partners as they
address these concerns. Chevallier said the GOF was also
concerned about recent USG talks with Lithuania on detainees
(ref d). France, he cautioned, was standing firm on the
necessity of an EU process before implementation of bilateral
agreements between the USG and EU member states on the
matter. Williamson noted that recent public pledges by
Lithuania to accept Guantanamo detainees were the result of
almost two years of talks, and that Lithuania has been firm
that implementation of an agreement to accept detainees would
occur only after agreement of a common EU position.
¶2. (S/NF) SUMMARY CONTINUED: Chevallier noted French concern
that former detainees, after being released from Guantanamo,
could return to or become involved in terrorist activities.
Williamson noted that of the approximately 60 detainees for
whom the U.S. was seeking resettlement all had been
previously approved for transfer. Chevallier asked if there
were any USG plans to transfer detainees to other parts of
the U.S. without the promise of a swift trial and if the U.S.
was going to accept some of these low-risk detainees.
Chevallier claimed that the more information France had
regarding these issues the better able it would be to
persuade the French public and other EU member states by
highlighting U.S. efforts to resettle the detainees.
Williamson replied that the interagency review process headed
by the Attorney General would try to answer these and other
questions regarding the detainees. Chevallier gave his
support to help with future meetings on this issue with the
French ministries of justice and the interior. END SUMMARY.
¶3. (SBU) S/WCI Ambassador Clint Williamson met on February 16
with French MFA advisors to the foreign minister Eric
Chevallier and Sylvie Pantz, as well as with MFA Desk Officer
for Strategic Affairs Camille Petit. Charg Mark Pekala,
Embassy poloff and Shaun Coughlin (S/WCI) also participated.
Detainees: French Open to Helping U.S.
--------------------------------------
¶4. (S/NF) In response to President Obama's January 22
Executive Order to close detention facilities at Guantanamo
Bay Naval Base (ref a), French FM Kouchner publicly gave his
support to review the idea of accepting detainees deemed not
to be a security risk (ref b). S/WCI Ambassador Williamson
followed up with advisors to the French foreign minister on
February 16 to seek GOF cooperation on the resettlement of
Guantanamo detainees. Williamson noted that President Obama
and Secretary Clinton strongly believe closing the detention
center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba is a critical foreign policy
issue facing the USG. Secretary Clinton asked Williamson to
meet with European partners to explain the USG position on
this matter since the change of administration. Williamson
thanked France for its help on this issue, noting that France
has a unique role to play in formulating a process within the
European Union (EU) to accept detainees and helping assuage
the concerns of member states that might stymie EU consensus
on the issue.
¶5. (S/NF) Foreign Ministry spokesman Eric Chevallier
reiterated France's willingness to assist the U.S. on this
issue (ref b and c), but clarified the GOF position:
detainees would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis; the
detainee had to specifically request resettlement in France;
and France would need full information on interested
detainees in order to review any security and judicial
implications. Chevallier said the GOF was "happy, in
principal" that the prison would be closed, but noted that
any agreement by France to accept detainees could not be
centered on discussions of "numbers" (i.e., France, and other
EU members, cannot be told they have to accept a specific
number of detainees).
French Stress Importance of Common EU Position
--------------------------------------------- -
¶6. (S/NF) Chevallier said the GOF supports an open EU process
that would allow decisions to be made on a national basis,
similar to what the Czech Republic has been proposing. The
most important issue, he said, would be addressing concerns
among Schengen countries. Williamson said the U.S. was aware
of the complexities of the Schengen issue and pledged to work
with EU partners as they address these concerns. Williamson
said the USG was concerned about the potential for any EU
process to drag out, especially by EU member states that did
not want to accept detainees. The USG hopes that France
could play an important role to assuage these concerns.
Chevallier noted that while there would not be complete
consensus within the EU on whether to accept detainees the
GOF would push other EU member states to be more open. There
was room for EU evolution in a common position, he said.
Williamson also noted that EU members Ireland and Portugal
were wary of an EU process that did not allow for
flexibility, as what happened when both of these countries
were directed by the EU to take Palestinian militants
involved in the 2002 siege of the Church of the Nativity in
Bethlehem. Chevallier said that Church of the Nativity
scenario was unlikely to happen again. Rather, a solution
such as what the Czechs were now proposing seemed more likely
as it hinged on flexibility.
¶7. (S/NF) Chevallier said the GOF was also concerned about
recent USG talks with Lithuania on the matter (ref d); he
hoped Williamson could provide him with more details on those
discussions. Regarding Lithuania, Williamson noted that
recent public statements by that government to accept
Guantanamo detainees were the result of almost two years of
talks. He said that Lithuania was interested in accepting
some of the Uzbek detainees because these detainees -- as was
deemed by the GOL -- could best fit into Lithuanian society
due to a common language and the presence of a large Uzbek
population in the country. Williamson clarified that the GOL
intended to implement a decision to accept these detainees
only once an EU framework had been agreed on. Williamson
also explained that the U.S. would continue to pursue
bilateral discussions with interested states as the EU
process progressed. He said that it would create inordinate
delays if bilateral discussions had to be put on hold until
the EU process was completed, and stressed that this was
entirely consistent with the preferred Czech approach of
creating a "permissive EU environment in which member states
could decide to accept detainees." Chevallier agreed that
this was a logical way forward.
Detainees: French Concerns about Security
-----------------------------------------
¶8. (S/NF) Sylvie Pantz said the GOF was concerned about the
reliability of information now available on detainees. She
said that the GOF would need as much case information as
possible in order to make a proper assessment. Pantz noted
that recent requests by the NGO community -- Reprieve and
Human Rights Watch -- to the GOF to accept detainees lacked
details, which made it difficult to verify claims of abuse
and assess security concerns. She was hoping the U.S. could
help fill these gaps. Williamson noted that a major change
within the Obama administration's approach was moving lead
responsibility for detainee status reviews from the
Department of Defense to the Department of Justice. The
Attorney General would now lead the interagency process.
Williamson said the process would ensure that all information
pertaining to a detainee was compiled in one place, that
fresh reviews of the material would take place in order to
determine prosecutability and that renewed threat assessments
would be undertaken. He said the USG was happy to facilitate
visits to Guantanamo to interview detainees who might be
resettled, as well as share medical and case records. So
far, he noted, there were 60 low-risk detainees who had been
previously approved for transfer and it was unlikely the
security assessment for these individuals would be raised,
although it was possible.
¶9. (S/NF) Pantz and Chevallier asked about recent reports of
detainees who, after being released, return to or become
involved in terrorist activities. Chevallier said there were
concerns in France that detainees determined to be low-risk
before entering Guantanamo could, depending on their
experiences in the detention center, pose serious risks to
security once released. Williamson said that out of the 525
detainees already released, over 500 returned to their home
countries. Forty to 60 of these individuals were thought to
have engaged in some sort of terrorist actions, ranging from
minor to larger acts, such as reports of detainees returning
to the battlefield in Iraq or Afghanistan. However, he
noted, all of these cases had been previously assessed as
higher risk, which was very different from the detainees for
whom the U.S. was now seeking to resettle. Williamson said
threat level assessments were based on the present state of
the detainee, taking into account interviews, psychiatric
evaluations and other reviews. He indicated that the one
other case of low-threat detainee resettlements, to Albania,
had gone well and that the eight former detainees had
assimilated to varying degrees into life there. Further,
France could be assured that the U.S. would share any
security concerns regarding the detainees with its friends
and allies.
French Questions about U.S. Plans to Resettle Detainees
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶10. (S/NF) Chevallier asked if there were any USG plans to
transfer high-risk detainees to the U.S. without the promise
of a swift trial. He also asked if the U.S. was going to
accept some of the low-risk detainees. Chevallier noted that
more information France had regarding these issues the better
able it would be to persuade the French public and other EU
member states by highlighting U.S. efforts to find a solution
to the detainee issue. Williamson replied that the
interagency review process would try to answer these and
other questions regarding the detainees. That aside, he said
the Obama administration realizes it would be a bad idea to
simply move detainees from one place to another as it would
not adequately address the problem. Pantz asked whether
detainees who could not return home but were seeking to be
resettled would simply receive a wish list of potential
accepting countries. Williamson said the U.S. was looking
into options to establish links with potential accepting
nations and the detainee, such as what was recently done with
the Uzbeks and Lithuania, but clarified that the USG was
reluctant to simply ask detainees where they would like to go
as it could complicate the resettlement process.
Future Talks: Offer to Help
---------------------------
¶11. (S/NF) Chevallier suggested that for future visits
Williamson should also speak to representatives from the
French ministries of justice and the interior. He said the
MFA would take the lead on setting up these meetings for
Williamson,s next visit to France.
¶12. (U) SWCI Williamson has cleared this message.
PEKALA