

Currently released so far... 12646 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AEMR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
ACOA
ASIG
AADP
AGR
ANET
ADPM
AMCHAMS
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BT
BP
BX
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CR
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CFED
CODEL
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CARSON
COPUOS
CIA
CL
CN
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
EPET
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
ENIV
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ENVR
ESENV
ENNP
ERNG
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
EXIM
ELECTIONS
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IT
IO
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IDP
IGAD
ILC
ITRA
ICTR
ITU
IBET
ITF
INRA
INRO
INTELSAT
IEFIN
IRC
IRAQI
ITALY
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INRB
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KSEP
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KIRF
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KSEO
KVPR
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KO
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCGC
KVIR
KFSC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KX
KMFO
KR
KMOC
KRIM
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KPAI
KICA
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MARAD
MG
MTRE
MASC
MW
MRCRE
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NGO
NR
NATIONAL
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OECD
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PDOV
PHUMPGOV
PCI
PTBS
PEL
PG
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
POGOV
POV
PRAM
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PMIL
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PRL
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
ROOD
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SPCE
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SNARCS
SH
SAARC
STEINBERG
SG
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SWE
SHI
SEN
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
TF
THPY
TP
TBID
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UNMIK
UY
UNCHR
UNO
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCND
UNCHC
UNCSD
USUN
USOAS
UNFCYP
USNC
UNIDROIT
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09STATE120099, BLUE LANTERN OUTREACH TO CANADA: DISCUSSIONS WITH
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09STATE120099.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09STATE120099 | 2009-11-20 18:55 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Secretary of State |
VZCZCXRO5397
RR RUEHMT
DE RUEHC #0099/01 3270604
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 201855Z NOV 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0426-0429
RUEHMT/AMCONSUL MONTREAL 0043-0046
RUEHON/AMCONSUL TORONTO 0020-0023
INFO RHMCSUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC 7001-7004
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHINGTON DC 6078-6081
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEPINS/HQ BICE INTEL WASHINGTON DC 0767-0770
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 STATE 120099
SENSITIVE
C O R R E C T E D C O P Y (SENSITIVE CAPTION ADDED)
SIPDIS
STATE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETTC KOMC CA
SUBJECT: BLUE LANTERN OUTREACH TO CANADA: DISCUSSIONS WITH
EMBASSY AND CONSULATES, GOC OFFICIALS, AND INDUSTRY
REF: 2006 BLUE LANTERN GUIDEBOOK
STATE 00120099 001.2 OF 004
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Representatives from the Bureau
of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Compliance (PM/DTCC) met October 13-16 with
Mission Canada staff in Montreal, Ottawa, and Toronto, GOC
officials, and local defense industry to discuss
the Blue Lantern end-use monitoring program and
related defense trade compliance issues. PM/DTCC reps
briefed
embassy and consular staff on implementing the
Blue Lantern program at post and shared results of
a research project involving U.S. companies'
use of the Canadian exemption to export defense articles
to Canada. Preliminaryresults of the research indicate as
many as 154 third party transfer violations involving U.S.
defense articles exported under the Canadian exemption; DTCC
team agreed to further consultations with ICE
attach office as additional results are obtained.
Team also conducted a Blue Lantern site visit
in Montreal to Unisource Technology, Inc., a private
company which provides ITAR-controlled defense articles
to National Defense Canada. Washington believes the
outreach visit achieved goals of improving GOC and industry
understanding of U.S. export control laws and regulations,
strengthening country team's knowledge of Blue Lantern
program, and enhancing DTCC's understanding of Canadian
defense industry and GOC export/import and technology
security procedures.
--------------------------------------------- ---
PURPOSE OF TRIP AND MEMBERS OF BLUE LANTERN TEAM
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶2. (U) Administered by the Office of Defense
Trade Controls Compliance (PM/DTCC) and pursuant
to the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), Blue
Lantern is a global program designed to verify
the end-use, end-users, and final disposition
of U.S. defense articles,
technology and services subject to the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).
This visit was part of ongoing PM/DTCC's efforts
to improve the effectiveness of Blue Lantern
through outreach visits with embassies, foreign
industry, and host governments. The DTCC Blue
Lantern team consisted of Research and Analysis
Division (RAD) Chief Ed Peartree and PM/DTCC/RAD
Compliance Specialists Kyle Ballard and Tim Mazzarelli.
--------------------------------------------- --------
MONTREAL CONSULATE TEAM BRIEF AND INDUSTRY SITE VISIT
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶3. (U) The Blue Lantern team briefed Political
Officer Peter Martin, Assistant ICE attach David Denton,
and Foreign Commercial Specialist Gina Bento on the
Department's program for end-use monitoring of defense
articles and services, guidelines for implementing the
program at post, and the importance of preventing the
unauthorized re-export and retransfer of U.S. defense
articles. Team also briefed participants on its research
project involving U.S. companies' use of the
Canadian exemption and Department's concern that the
exemption may be abused by certain parties to facilitate
illegal exports.
¶4. (U) Embassy Ottawa Economic Officer Lori
Balbi and Peter Martin accompanied Blue Lantern
team on a site visit to Unisource Technology, Inc.
(Unisource). Team met with Unisource President
& CEO Rudy Rutenberg, Executive Director Bruce
Rutenberg, and Contracts Administration Director
Cathy Jones. Unisource staff provided background
information on export requests and business operations,
as well as Unisource's physical security measures
STATE 00120099 002.2 OF 004
for handling sensitive U.S. defense articles.
Based on verification of order and documentation
establishing Canadian Armed Forces as final end user
and evidence of a long standing business relationship
with National Defense Canada, team was confident that
Unisource is a reliable recipient of USML items.
--------------------------------------------- --------------
OTTAWA CONSULATE TEAM AND GOC OFFICIALS BRIEF
--------------------------------------------- --------------
¶5. (U) Blue Lantern team PM/DTCC reps briefed Senior Case
Officer,
Controlled Goods Directorate (CGD), Public Works and
Government Services Canada, Serge Poirier and colleague
Mary Hyde on the Blue Lantern end-use monitoring
program. Team emphasized that Blue Lantern is not an
investigation
or law enforcement activity but rather a cooperative
program designed to improve security and integrity of
defense trade relationship between U.S. and international
partners.
6 (U) Poirier in turn provided a detailed
accounting of the CGD's compliance program including
Canada's SOP for registration of companies dealing in
strategic goods. According to Poirier, companies go
through a general vetting process which assesses a
firm's history and ownership. Registration lapses
after a five year period at which time the company
must re-justify/re-apply. During the five year
registration period companies must maintain all business
records and visitation logs, must internally vet all
employees, and are subject to inspection by the CGD.
Poirier noted that all registered companies will be
inspected at least once during the five year
registration period. Should inspections reveal
noncompliance, company registration can be suspended
or revoked. Problems that reveal possible criminal
violations are referred to the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police (RCMP).
¶7. (SBU) Blue Lantern team met with ICE attach
Craig Healy, Deputy ICE attach Bobby Fuentes, Assistant
ICE attach Spencer Schneider, ATF attach Bob Thomas,
and FBI Legal Attach Bob Doherty to discuss Blue Lantern
end-use monitoring and related defense trade issues.
ICE attach office was
familiar with the Blue Lantern program and is highly
focused on export-related cases. Healey noted that there
is strong cooperation at the working level with Canadian
Border Security Agency (CBSA) and the RCMP; less so at senior
levels where legal complications and obstacles to joint
cooperation arise.
¶8. (SBU) Canadian export controls enforcement
has traditionally been viewed mainly as a regulatory issue,
rather than as a criminal enforcement matter; this
according to Healy, is gradually changing. CBSA is Canada's
Customs
agency but has limited enforcement capability; RCMP is
the body that investigates potential criminal cases.
During the meeting it was noted that an obstacle in
the U.S.-CA law enforcement relationship is that
RCMP has a tendency to over-classify information, creating
barriers to information exchange. Furthermore, Canadian
laws on privacy inhibit the free exchange of information
regarding Canadian citizens, even among GOC agencies.
Healy noted, however, that with regard to Blue Lantern
requests information seems to flow more freely. ICE
will approach CBSA or RCMP to find out what they might
know about a Canadian company (subject of a Blue Lantern
check) and/or to share Department's concerns.
¶9. (SBU) PM/DTCC team met with CBSA Counterproliferation
Section Manager George Webb, RCMP Staff Sergeant,
Tim Ranger, and ICE attachs. Webb and Ranger described
their
respective agencies' missions and discussed shared agency
goals. Webb indicated that destination of an export is the
primary factor scrutinized by CBSA, and that they also
consider
the track record and reputation of exporters. The agency
does not have discretionary authority to ban a problematic
exporter (Comment: DTCC can place a company/entity under
STATE 00120099 003.2 OF 004
a "policy of denial" based on documented concerns, without
criminal indictment or conviction) without a
criminal conviction but can detain goods as long as the
agency deems
appropriate. The GOC is currently reviewing
counterproliferation
legislation that would further criminalize proliferation
activity,
and presumably expand their powers with regard to export
investigations. Webb also noted that CBSA has an "alert"
system similar to DTCC's Watch List that flags potentially
problematic entities.
¶10. (SBU) DTCC discussed its research findings
from export filings citing the Canadian exemption
and noted that there were 154 instances of possible
exports (or re-exports) to third countries (Comment:
exports under the Canadian exemption are for end-use
in Canada only). Webb indicated that CBSA could
put an alert on the companies involved into their system.
Webb and Ranger noted that traditionally, both CBSA
and RCMP have been focused on in-bound shipments and
are only now becoming more focused on exports.
ICE attach Craig Healy suggested that a further avenue of
U.S.-Canada cooperation might include the creation of
an international task force that would bring
Canadian-U.S. DOJ prosecutors together to create pressure
at higher levels in support of export enforcement.
DTCC indicated that it would pass this information to
the U.S. DOJ, National Coordinator for Export Enforcement
Cases, Steve Pelak.
¶11. (U) Blue Lantern team also met with Canadian
Department of Foreign Affairs and International
Trade (DFAIT) Senior Export Control Officer
Lynne Sabatino to discuss the respective
features of Canadian and U.S. export controls.
Sabatino exhibited extensive knowledge of ITAR
regulations and provided a detailed
description of the Canadian export control review process.
Sabatino explained that DFAIT export controls cover
both munitions and dual-use commodities, and consider
Canadian foreign policy in addition to national security
and international regimes
when making export decisions. Sabatino noted
that all license permit applications are reviewed
by technical experts who pre-screen authorization
requests for licensing permit officers. She
also explained procedural features that are
incorporated into the permit process which act to
safeguard transactions involving USML items. For
example, applications for permits have fields
for "country of manufacture" and "U.S. content".
If the end-items for export are listed as including
any U.S. content, the system will automatically prompt
the license permit officer to demonstrate compliance
with U.S. law. In items that include USML, the
applicant is required to obtain U.S. re-export
authorization. The system, however, relies on the
applicant for full disclosure. The improper re-export
of USML (by either failing to note content or false
declaration) thus is not only a violation of U.S.
law but of Canadian law as well.
¶12. (U) Canada conducts "post audit"
checks via their overseas Embassies. Pre-
permit checks are conducted from Ottawa and
consist mostly of background research and analysis.
Audits are initiated based on a variety of factors
including commodity sensitivity and destination
and are conducted at the discretion of the
permit officer. Sabatino stressed that DFAIT is
committed to maintaining the Canadian exemption
and that Canada applies appropriate security
and control measures to ensure the safe handling of USML.
--------------------------------------------- ----
TORONTO CONSULATE TEAM BRIEF
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶13. (SBU) In Toronto, Blue Lantern team met with Economic
and Political Section Chief, Lee MacTaggart and ICE
attach John Ward. MacTaggart and Ward emphasized
that Toronto - given its status as a business center
and ethnically diverse community - is where the
majority of export enforcement cases arise within the
STATE 00120099 004.2 OF 004
province.
They indicated that, due to equal opportunity laws
in Canada, dual citizens are often not required
to present themselves as such, making it difficult
to monitor possible ITAR violations involving
foreign nationals. MacTaggart also noted that
Canadian companies commonly establish post office
boxes in the United States through which they could receive
shipments, further complicating ITAR enforcement.
¶14. (SBU) Ward echoed many of the sentiments expressed
by ICE Ottawa indicating that at the working level,
the relationship between U.S. law enforcement and
the CBSA/RCMP is good but becomes less cooperative
at higher levels. MacTaggart indicated that a
possible avenue for better U.S.-CA enforcement
cooperation is through DFAIT, as the agency's
international trade component is the
"center of gravity" given its strong interest
in preserving positive U.S.-CA trade relations
and maintaining special status as it relates to the
Canadian exemption. DTCC team
briefed the preliminary results of
Canadian exemption research project, which had been
the basis for several recent Blue Lantern checks,
including an unfavorable check in Toronto. MacTaggart
requested information updates from Washington on
final disposition of Blue Lantern cases so that
Consulate team members can increase their own understanding of
local exporters and possible companies of concern
in the Toronto area.
¶15. (SBU) Comment: PM/DTCC Blue Lantern outreach
team found high interest and strong cooperation
from GOC officials and a motivated and well-informed
Mission Canada team with respect to the conduct
of Blue Lantern end-use monitoring.
The visit also appears to have met the
objectives of improving understanding of the
Blue Lantern end-use monitoring program and
USG munitions export laws and regulations. DTCC
team agreed to further consultations with ICE
attach office as additional results
are obtained regarding the use of the Canadian
exemption for license-free exports to Canada.
Outreach visit achieved goals of improving
industry's understanding of U.S. export control
laws and regulations, strengthening country
team's knowledge of Blue Lantern
program, and enhancing DTCC's understanding
of Canadian defense industry and GOC export/import
and technology security procedures.
¶16. (U) DTCC would like to express its gratitude
to Embassy Ottawa and Missions Montreal and Toronto,
and especially control officer Lori Balbi for
her assistance in arranging and executing this visit.
CLINTON