

Currently released so far... 12646 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AEMR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
ACOA
ASIG
AADP
AGR
ANET
ADPM
AMCHAMS
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BT
BP
BX
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CR
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CFED
CODEL
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CARSON
COPUOS
CIA
CL
CN
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
EPET
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
ENIV
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ENVR
ESENV
ENNP
ERNG
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
EXIM
ELECTIONS
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IT
IO
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IDP
IGAD
ILC
ITRA
ICTR
ITU
IBET
ITF
INRA
INRO
INTELSAT
IEFIN
IRC
IRAQI
ITALY
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INRB
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KSEP
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KIRF
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KSEO
KVPR
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KO
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCGC
KVIR
KFSC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KX
KMFO
KR
KMOC
KRIM
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KPAI
KICA
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MARAD
MG
MTRE
MASC
MW
MRCRE
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NGO
NR
NATIONAL
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OECD
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PDOV
PHUMPGOV
PCI
PTBS
PEL
PG
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
POGOV
POV
PRAM
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PMIL
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PRL
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
ROOD
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SPCE
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SNARCS
SH
SAARC
STEINBERG
SG
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SWE
SHI
SEN
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
TF
THPY
TP
TBID
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UNMIK
UY
UNCHR
UNO
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCND
UNCHC
UNCSD
USUN
USOAS
UNFCYP
USNC
UNIDROIT
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09UNVIEVIENNA284, KEY PARIS PACT MEMBERS URGE RESULTS RATHER THAN MEETINGS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09UNVIEVIENNA284.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09UNVIEVIENNA284 | 2009-06-18 09:11 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | UNVIE |
VZCZCXRO1990
OO RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHDIR RUEHKUK RUEHTRO
DE RUEHUNV #0284/01 1690911
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 180911Z JUN 09
FM USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9601
INFO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1672
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
AFGHA/AFGHANISTAN COLLECTIVE
RUCNIRA/IRAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 0102
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 UNVIE VIENNA 000284
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KCRM PREL PTER SNAR UN AF PK CA RU IT UK SW AS
NL, FR, GM
SUBJECT: KEY PARIS PACT MEMBERS URGE RESULTS RATHER THAN MEETINGS
REF: A: UNVIE VIENNA 249
¶B. UNVIE 006
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: In an informal June 9 meeting, key Paris Pact
members agreed to continue their support for the Pact. They also
agreed to use 2010 to review the implementation of recommendations
from three past roundtables -- precursors, financial flows, and
cross-border management. In addition, they proposed benchmarks to
guide the review. For precursors, proposed benchmarks include
seizure statistics, prosecution rates, countries involved in
operations, and information sharing. For financial flows, proposed
benchmarks are prosecution rates, ratification of the relevant
United Nations instruments to combat terrorist financing, number of
accounts seized, and implementation of legal frameworks to combat
corruption. For cross-border management, proposed benchmarks are
seizures at the border, and quality and effectiveness of
cross-border information sharing. Participants at the June 9 meeting
agreed to have these ideas considered by the next annual Policy
Consultative Group (PCG) meeting scheduled for November/December
¶2009. On behalf of the June 9 meeting participants, Counselor
forwarded these conclusions to the independent consultant who will
include the review of past round tables as a recommendation in his
evaluation report on the Paris Pact for UNODC. Besides the
conclusions on the review and the benchmarks, meeting participants
also heard Russia advocate partnership with regional bodies in which
Russia plays a leadership role. Russia and France also advocated
greater Paris Pact involvement in the implementation of UN Security
Council resolutions. END SUMMARY.
-----------------------------
Challenges for the Paris Pact
-----------------------------
¶2. (SBU) In the wake of the briefing by the independent consultant
(Neil Bailey of UK's Omega Consultancy) UNODC hired to evaluate the
Paris Pact (Ref A), Counselor hosted an informal meeting of core
Paris Pact member states on June 9 to discuss ways to improve the
Pact's operational effectiveness. Representatives from Australia,
Canada, France Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Russia, Sweden and U.K.
attended this meeting. All present agreed that their countries
would continue to support the Paris Pact because it serves a useful
political purpose by bringing together countries some of which have
few other channels for interacting with one another. Nevertheless,
all have been frustrated by the paucity of concrete results from the
15 annual expert roundtables which have been held since 2003.
¶3. (SBU) Canada criticized UNODC for giving the same presentations
at expert roundtables and at the annual Policy Consultative Group
(PCG) meetings. Some also criticized the growing propensity for
certain countries to send diplomats rather than experts to the
roundtables, thus directing focus on political rather than
operational issues. UK stressed the importance of roundtable
participation by "the right people and the right countries,"
particularly because the Paris Pact had not been well-attended by
critical central Asian countries. Counselor suggested establishing
focal points of contact to encourage information sharing among
experts. France noted that focal points already exist in the
Automated Donor Assistance Mechanism (ADAM) but are insufficient.
Others did not embrace the focal points idea, claiming that ADAM has
been largely ineffective.
------------------------------
Picking Roundtables for Review
------------------------------
¶4. (SBU) Counselor proposed that member states should use the next
annual Policy Consultative Group (PCG) meeting, in November/December
2009, to review past accomplishments, rather than to choose new
topics for the next three roundtables in 2010. All agreed the Pact
should not be a forum for indefinite roundtables, and member states
should find ways to evaluate the implementation of recommendations
from past round tables. They also agreed with Counselor's
suggestion to choose two or three past roundtables for such an
evaluation. There was consensus that past roundtables on
precursors, financial flows and cross-border cooperation should be
selected for such review, and that instead of selecting new topics,
the November/December 2009 PCG meeting should adopt the idea to
review the three past roundtables in 2010.
--------------------
Choosing Benchmarks
UNVIE VIEN 00000284 002 OF 003
--------------------
¶5. (SBU) Participants then discussed benchmarks for measuring the
results of these past roundtables. Counselor noted that on the
margins of the last PCG meeting in December 2008, Ambassadors (of
the countries represented at the June 9 meeting) had urged UNODC to
develop metrics to measure the success of the Pact (Ref B). Germany
suggested that it would be helpful to solicit UNODC and country
feedback on implementation to date. Canada reminded attendees that
some recommendations had been implemented and integrated into
UNODC's Rainbow Strategy, so examining those recommendations would
be a good place to start with the review. Following French
suggestions, meeting participants reached consensus that for
precursors, benchmarks should include seizure statistics,
prosecution rates, countries involved in operations, and information
sharing. For financial flows, the benchmarks should include
prosecution rates, ratification of the relevant United Nations
instruments to combat terrorist financing, number of accounts
seized, and implementation of legal frameworks to combat corruption.
For cross-border management, proposed benchmarks are seizures at
the border, and quality and effectiveness of cross-border
information sharing.
-----------------------------
Russian and French Comments
-----------------------------
¶6. (SBU) Russia advocated greater Paris Pact cooperation with
regional bodies such as the Collective Security Treaty Organization
(CSTO) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). It also
urged Paris Pact involvement in the implementation and enforcement
of UN Security Council resolutions by listing suspected traffickers
and terrorists. France supported the use of UN Security Council
resolutions, especially in the area of sanctions. However, the
French representative suggested that Vienna's Friends of Afghanistan
Group, rather than the Paris Pact, may be a more suitable venue for
tackling the issue of sanctions.
¶7. (SBU) In addition, France noted that other regions, such as the
Andean countries, were modeling parts of their multilateral
counternarcotics efforts on the Paris Pact. He also urged improved
regional cooperation in Central Asia, an early goal of the Pact
which he said has not yet been realized.
------------------
Follow up Action
------------------
¶8. (U) Counselor summarized the conclusions for the attendees, and
offered to forward them to independent consultant Neil Bailey for
incorporation in the evaluation report he is preparing for UNODC.
She circulated the drafted conclusions among the meeting
participants on June 10. (Text follows in Annex, para 10.) With no
objections from them, she forwarded the conclusions to Bailey on
June 15. Bailey replied that he agreed with the conclusions and
would include the review of past round tables as a recommendation in
his report to the UNODC.
-------
Comment
-------
¶9. (SBU) The Paris Pact was conceived in 2003 from a great idea -
to coordinate and improve regional cooperation to fight Afghan
narcotics. Although it has definitely achieved some successes, it
also has become more of a forum for meetings than for action. UNODC
was wise to seek an independent evaluation - the second in the Pact
history - before proceeding to a third phase. We hope that the
conclusions from our informal June 9 meeting will help the Paris
Pact to focus more on results rather than meetings. End Comment.
-----
Annex
-----
¶9. (U) The following text was circulated among the June 9 meeting
participants and forwarded to the independent consultant.
BEGIN QUOTE: Representatives of the following permanent missions in
Vienna met June 9 to discuss ways to make Paris Pact more effective.
The participating countries in the meeting were: Australia, Canada,
France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Russia, Sweden, U.K. and U.S.
The participants made the following recommendations to improve Paris
Pact: 1) All present want to continue to support the Paris Pact, 2)
However, all agree that the Pact should not be an indefinite round
UNVIE VIEN 00000284 003 OF 003
of roundtables. Instead, there should be some stocktaking of how
recommendations from past roundtables have been implemented. A
practical way to do it is to choose two or three of past roundtables
for in-depth follow up and review, 3) Therefore, at the annual
policy consultative group meeting in November/December 2009, member
states should decide not decide new topics for the three roundtables
in 2010. Instead, they should decide to use 2010 to review the
implementation of the recommendations of three past roundtables, 4)
There was agreement to choose the following three roundtables for
review: a)Precursors, b)Financial flows, c)Cross-border
cooperation., 5) There was also agreement that benchmarks should be
established for such review. Proposed benchmarks include: a) For
precursors: seizure statistics, prosecution rates, countries
involved in operations, and information sharing; b) For Financial
flows: Prosecution rates, ratification of FATF, number of accounts
seized, implementation of legal frameworks to combat corruption, and
efforts to combat terrorist financing; implementation of the UNSC
resolutions against terrorist financing., c) Cross-border
cooperation, with focus on the immediate neighbors at this point
(Pakistan and Iran): information-sharing, communication, joint
border exercises. END QUOTE
SCHULTE