

Currently released so far... 12646 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AEMR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
ACOA
ASIG
AADP
AGR
ANET
ADPM
AMCHAMS
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BT
BP
BX
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CR
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CFED
CODEL
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CARSON
COPUOS
CIA
CL
CN
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
EPET
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
ENIV
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ENVR
ESENV
ENNP
ERNG
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
EXIM
ELECTIONS
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IT
IO
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IDP
IGAD
ILC
ITRA
ICTR
ITU
IBET
ITF
INRA
INRO
INTELSAT
IEFIN
IRC
IRAQI
ITALY
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INRB
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KSEP
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KIRF
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KSEO
KVPR
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KO
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCGC
KVIR
KFSC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KX
KMFO
KR
KMOC
KRIM
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KPAI
KICA
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MARAD
MG
MTRE
MASC
MW
MRCRE
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NGO
NR
NATIONAL
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OECD
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PDOV
PHUMPGOV
PCI
PTBS
PEL
PG
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
POGOV
POV
PRAM
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PMIL
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PRL
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
ROOD
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SPCE
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SNARCS
SH
SAARC
STEINBERG
SG
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SWE
SHI
SEN
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
TF
THPY
TP
TBID
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UNMIK
UY
UNCHR
UNO
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCND
UNCHC
UNCSD
USUN
USOAS
UNFCYP
USNC
UNIDROIT
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08OTTAWA446, CANADA ANNOUNCES GREATER DETAIL ON CLIMATE POLICY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08OTTAWA446.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08OTTAWA446 | 2008-04-01 21:11 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO0537
RR RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0446/01 0922111
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 012111Z APR 08
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7605
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC
RUEAEPA/EPA WASHDC
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 OTTAWA 000446
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA, EEB AND OES
DOE FOR POLICY & INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
EPA FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
WHITE HOUSE FOR CEQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV ENRG CA
SUBJECT: CANADA ANNOUNCES GREATER DETAIL ON CLIMATE POLICY
REF: A. 07 OTTAWA 1798
¶B. 07 OTTAWA 0795
¶C. 06 OTTAWA 3182
Sensitive but Unclassified. Protect accordingly.
¶1. (SBU) Summary: On March 10 Canada's federal government
provided significant additional detail on its "Turning the
Corner" climate change plan released last year. This latest
iteration announced the government's intent to establish a
clear price signal for carbon and greater detail on plans to
establish a domestic trading scheme for GHG emissions. Draft
regulations will be developed and put out for public comment
in fall 2008. Final regulations should be approved by the
fall of 2009 and come into force on January 1, 2010. The
federal plan does not mesh evenly with current provincial
climate change approaches, likely leaving gaps and varying
standards in place across the country. End Summary.
¶2. (U) On March 10 the federal government unveiled further
details of its regulatory framework for greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions. The framework, originally announced in April 2007
(Ref B), is intended to reduce GHGs by 20 per cent below 2006
levels by 2020 and cut emissions by 60-70 per cent by 2050,
initially via emissions-intensity reduction targets and after
2025 through fixed emissions caps. If these targets are met,
Canada would produce in 2020 about 610 megatons (Mt) of
carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent GHGs, 330 megatons less than
under a business as usual scenario. The final regulations
are intended to apply to about 700 facilities in 16 key
industrial sectors, including power generation, oil and gas,
pulp and paper, iron and steel, smelting, and refining. Some
industrial facilities with emissions under 50 kilo-tons (kt)
per year of CO2 equivalent will be exempt, as will "fixed
process" facilities, whose emissions are not combustion
related. According to government calculations, the plan will
have a measurable negative economic impact, which is not
estimated to exceed 0.5 percent of Canada's projected real
GDP in any single year between 2010 and 2020.
¶3. (U) The federal government calculates that federal
measures alone will reduce GHG emissions in 2020 by
approximately 230 megatons (with 165 megatons of this
reduction attributable to measures in "Turning the Corner").
Independently, provincial and territorial governments have
already committed to targets implying a further reduction of
around 300 megatons. There is overlap with federal efforts,
but the government believes provincial and territorial
initiatives already underway will supply incremental
reductions of 40 megatons, and expects provinces and
territories to introduce additional measures yield
incremental reductions of another 35 megatons. With an added
25 megatons from the efforts of a federal-provincial-industry
clean electricity task force, the federal government believes
the targeted reductions of 330 megatons (20 percent) from
2006 levels are within reach.
New Details
-----------
¶4. (U) The additional detail announced on March 10 elaborated
on the emissions reduction targets released almost a year
ago. All covered industrial sectors (see full list in para
17) will be required to reduce their emissions intensity from
2006 levels by 18 percent by 2010, with 2 percent continuous
improvement every year after that. These intensity targets
will be applied at the facility, sector or corporate level as
determined after consultation with the affected industries,
Qdetermined after consultation with the affected industries,
and minimum thresholds for application will be set in five
sectors. For chemicals, nitrogen-based fertilizers, and
natural gas pipelines the threshold will be 50 kt CO2
equivalent per year. The threshold for the electricity
sector will be 10 MW generating capacity. For upstream oil
and gas, the targets will apply to facilities with 3 kt of
emissions per year and 10,000 barrels of oil per day.
Although the federal thresholds for upstream oil and gas are
more stringent than those announced by the province of
Alberta in its 2007 "Specified Gas Emitters Regulations," the
federal government says it is committed to a "common
threshold and reporting regime in Alberta."
¶5. (U) As announced in April 2007, "Fixed Process" emissions
will receive an exemption (technically an intensity reduction
target of 0 percent), but the March 10 announcement provides
a more precise definition of fixed process emissions.
OTTAWA 00000446 002 OF 004
Greenhouse gas emissions from a "fixed process" are a direct
result of the production process, not a result of combustion
or from the processing of crude oil or natural gas. Fixed
processes account for about 60 percent of GHG emissions from
the iron and steel sector and the cement sector, 50 percent
from the aluminum sector, 40 percent from the fertilizer
sector, and smaller shares in other sectors. The non-fixed
process portion of GHG emissions in all regulated industrial
sectors will be subject required emission reductions.
¶6. (U) The most significant modification in the March 10
update is that all oil sands up-graders and in-situ plants
and all coal-fired electricity plants that come into
operation in 2012 or after will be required to meet stricter
emissions targets (using carbon capture and storage or its
equal in effectiveness ) or pay C$15 per ton of CO2
equivalent GHGs emitted over their limit. (The effective
"price" of a ton of excess CO2 equivalent GHG emissions is
expected to grow to about C$65 per ton by 2018-20). In order
to ensure that carbon capture and storage (CCS) is
"widespread by 2018," the plan envisions that firms will be
credited for investments in "pre-certified CCS projects" for
up to 100 percent of their regulatory obligation through
¶2017. (Comment: The devil is in the details, as Canadian
Association of Petroleum Producers president Pierre Alvarez
pointed out. "We'll have to figure out what it means" since
the plan remains "thin on detail" with no specifics on which
carbon capture and storage projects might qualify. End
comment).
¶7. (U) This CCS approach does mesh well with the call in
January 2008 by the joint Canada-Alberta Carbon Capture and
Storage Task Force for the immediate creation of a C$2
billion government fund to kick-start development of carbon
capture and storage projects in Canada. So far, Alberta has
committed "up to" C$500 million, while the federal budget of
February 2008 pledged C$250 million. However, almost all of
this federal money is for a zero-emissions coal-fired power
plant in Saskatchewan.
¶8. (U) The March 10 release also provided additional
information on the availability of Clean Development
Mechanism (CDM) and domestic offsets. Firms may use credits
from the Kyoto Protocol's CDM for up to 10 percent of their
regulatory obligation. The domestic offset system will be
administered by Environment Canada. Domestic offset projects
must take place in Canada and achieve reductions in one or
more of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide,
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), or sulfur
hexafluoride. Each offset credit will represent one ton of
carbon dioxide equivalent. The plan notes that consideration
will be given to recognizing reductions originating in the
U.S., "once the United States has a regulatory system in
place," and goes on to state that a good example of emissions
that could be covered by such an arrangement are those stored
by the Weyburn-Midale CCS project. The government expects to
publish detailed guidance for project proponents and
verification bodies this spring and summer, and Environment
Canada will begin reviewing project applications in the
autumn.
¶9. (U) The announcement further defined "Credits for Early
Action." Firms that took verified early action to reduce
emissions between 1992 and 2006 will be eligible for a total
Qemissions between 1992 and 2006 will be eligible for a total
of 15 Mt in credits (5 Mt per year in 2010, 2011 and 2012).
These credits will be bankable and tradable. The government
is seeking feedback until May 18, 2008, on the proposed
eligibility and allocation rules for the credits.
Establishing a Carbon Price Signal
----------------------------------
¶10. (U) In early January 2008, in response to a government
request for advice on reducing GHG emissions over the longer
term, Canada's arms-length advisory body, the National
Roundtable on the Environment and Economy (NRTEE),
recommended the federal government "implement a strong,
clear, consistent and certain GHG emission price signal
across the entire Canadian economy as soon as possible in
order to successfully shift Canada to a lower GHG emissions
pathway" and institute an "emission tax or a cap-and-trade
system or a combination of the two." This newest iteration
of the "Turning the Corner" plan emphasizes the government's
intent to take up the NRTEE recommendation and establish "a
market price for carbon."
OTTAWA 00000446 003 OF 004
¶11. (U) Under the Regulatory Framework, firms are offered
several different options to meet their emissions intensity
targets: they may undertake in-house abatement, or they may
contribute to the new government-managed "Technology Fund,"
acquire emission credits from other domestic regulated
industries, purchase offset credits from domestic sources
outside of regulated sectors, or use CDM. In the
government's economic modeling, the lowest cost option, the
Technology Fund's contribution rate of C$15 per ton CO2
equivalent in 2010-12, has the effect of moderating the price
in the early years of the regime; the cost of contributions
to the Technology Fund then rises to C$20 per ton in 2013 and
beyond, but at the same time the maximum allowable Fund
contributions decline from 70 percent of a firm's regulatory
obligation in 2010 to zero by 2018. Receipts into the Fund
will be invested in qualifying GHG emissions reductions
technology projects.
¶12. (U) This structure, coupled with the required emissions
intensity improvements rate of 2 per cent per year after
2010, means the carbon price signaled by the overall
framework to industry increases steadily. As a result, by
about 2015, the Fund is beginning to play a marginal role in
setting that price signal for industrial reductions, and it
is instead the market price of emissions (i.e., what it costs
firms to achieve actual reductions) that drives the selection
of compliance options in the model. By 2018, firms will be
responding to carbon (CO2 equivalent) prices expected to be
in the range of C$65 per ton. The government anticipates
that at this price in-house reductions and purchase of
offsets from outside the regulated sectors will be
cost-competitive options. (Note: Although the government has
yet to fully address how it will enforce compliance, we note
the Minister of the Environment has certain administrative
authorities granted by the Canadian Environmental Protection
Act (1999) that may be applied. End note.)
Market Balkanization?
---------------------
¶13. (SBU) Through the domestic offsets mechanism noted
earlier, the plan "takes the first step to set up a carbon
emissions trading market," the second key NRTEE
recommendation. However, as the federal government moves
forward with plans to create a trading system for greenhouse
gas emissions, significant hurdles remain. For example, the
federal plan anticipates a market for emissions credits
across Canada, irrespective of provincial boundaries, but
Alberta insists companies in Alberta can only purchase
offsets to meet their emissions targets from suppliers in
that province. As Alberta Premier Stelmach noted, "We're
not....looking at an interregional transfer of wealth."
Meanwhile Manitoba and British Columbia are collaborating in
developing a regional emissions markets with a number of
American states in the Western Climate Initiative. Quebec
and Ontario are observers in, and eventually want to join,
the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) of northeastern
and mid-Atlantic states. "Turning the Corner" notes that
Canada would consider recognizing reductions originating in
the United States if the U.S. establishes a comparable
regulatory system.
Just Another Step in a Long Process
-----------------------------------
¶14. (U) This version of the regulatory framework is but
another step in this government's iterative process to
Qanother step in this government's iterative process to
develop a workable climate change policy that began in
October 2006 with Bill C-30 and the affiliated "Notice of
Intent in Regulate" (Ref C), followed by the unveiling of the
original Turning the Corner plan in April 2007 (Ref B). The
government has also announced a grab bag of federal grants
and policy initiatives across the climate change spectrum
(Ref A). We understand, however, that this edition of the
framework is the final post-consultation version with
validated targets and measures, and will be translated into
regulatory language. Draft regulations are expected to be
published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, for public comment
in the fall of 2008. The final regulations are expected to
be approved and published in the Canada Gazette, Part II, in
the fall of 2009 and come into force on January 1, 2010.
¶15. (U) The April 2007 Turning the Corner plan covered other
air pollutants (SOx, NOx, and volatile organic compounds) as
well as greenhouse gases. The government anticipates adding
OTTAWA 00000446 004 OF 004
the air pollutant regulatory elements to the draft
regulations for publication in the Canada Gazette, Part I,
this fall.
Comment
-------
¶16. (SBU) Effective climate policy in Canada still faces a
number of conceptual and practical hurdles, and the prospect
of federal -- and provincial -- regulation introducing
serious unintended consequences is very real. The keystone
of the government's plan is a technology solution (carbon
capture and storage) whose effectiveness on a large scale has
not yet been demonstrated. Key CCS parameters are
ill-defined, including the list of "pre-certified CCS"
projects that can be used to offset emissions. And the
development of a GHG emissions trading market is proceeding
piece meal across the country. Coherent solutions to these
challenges will have to be addressed in the next step in the
process, the draft regulations to be published in the autumn
of 2008, for this plan to continue turning the corner on
climate change. End Comment.
¶17. (U) The regulatory framework for industrial greenhouse
gas emissions will apply to the following sectors: 1) oil
sands, 2) electricity, 3) petroleum refining, 4) chemicals,
5) fertilizers, 6) upstream oil and gas, 7) natural gas
pipelines, 8) potash, 9) iron ore pelletizing, 10) lime, 11)
iron and steel, 12) titanium, 13) pulp and paper, 14)
aluminum and alumina, 15) cement, and 16) base metal smelting.
Visit Canada,s Economy and Environment Forum at
http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/can ada
WILKINS