

Currently released so far... 12646 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AEMR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
ACOA
ASIG
AADP
AGR
ANET
ADPM
AMCHAMS
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BT
BP
BX
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CR
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CFED
CODEL
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CARSON
COPUOS
CIA
CL
CN
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
EPET
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
ENIV
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ENVR
ESENV
ENNP
ERNG
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
EXIM
ELECTIONS
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IT
IO
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IDP
IGAD
ILC
ITRA
ICTR
ITU
IBET
ITF
INRA
INRO
INTELSAT
IEFIN
IRC
IRAQI
ITALY
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INRB
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KSEP
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KIRF
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KSEO
KVPR
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KO
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCGC
KVIR
KFSC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KX
KMFO
KR
KMOC
KRIM
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KPAI
KICA
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MARAD
MG
MTRE
MASC
MW
MRCRE
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NGO
NR
NATIONAL
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OECD
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PDOV
PHUMPGOV
PCI
PTBS
PEL
PG
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
POGOV
POV
PRAM
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PMIL
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PRL
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
ROOD
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SPCE
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SNARCS
SH
SAARC
STEINBERG
SG
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SWE
SHI
SEN
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
TF
THPY
TP
TBID
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UNMIK
UY
UNCHR
UNO
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCND
UNCHC
UNCSD
USUN
USOAS
UNFCYP
USNC
UNIDROIT
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09MOSCOW1591, IMPLICATIONS OF REARMING GEORGIA FOR U.S.-RUSSIAN
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09MOSCOW1591.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09MOSCOW1591 | 2009-06-17 14:09 | 2010-12-01 21:30 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Moscow |
VZCZCXRO1322
OO RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHMO #1591/01 1681409
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 171409Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3852
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHXD/MOSCOW POLITICAL COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 MOSCOW 001591
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/10/2019
TAGS: PREL MARR PGOV RS GG
SUBJECT: IMPLICATIONS OF REARMING GEORGIA FOR U.S.-RUSSIAN
"RESET"
REF: A. MOSCOW 1225
¶B. MOSCOW 0840
Classified By: Ambassador John R. Beyrle: Reasons 1.4 (b, d).
¶1. (C) Summary: A decision to move towards a more robust
military relationship with Georgia will imperil our efforts
to re-start relations with Russia, if it is not carefully
calibrated and deployed. While Medvedev understands the
strategic and personal benefits of crafting a productive
partnership with the U.S., this impulse is trumped by the
GOR's "absolute" priority placed on expanding Russian
influence in the Eurasian neighborhood, preventing NATO
enlargement, and demonstrating Russia's great power status.
The Russian political class and populace is united behind
these principles, with the August war confirming for the
leadership that the international community lacks the levers
to coerce a change in Russian behavior. Russian criticism of
PfP exercises was both sincere -- anger over the "business as
usual" approach with Saakashvili -- and tactical, designed to
raise the costs of CIS cooperation with the West, but was not
matched by a change in military posture. However, given
consistent warnings over the consequences of weapons sales to
Georgia, we believe a lethal military supply relationship
with Tbilisi would come at the cost of advancing Georgia's
territorial integrity, and could lessen Russian restraint on
weapons transfers to Iran. We believe that keeping the focus
on Georgia's economic and democratic development, while
continuing our military cooperation with Tbilisi through
transparent PfP programming with European partners, and
non-lethal bilateral mil-mil training and assistance, is the
only viable -- if very long-term -- strategy to induce better
Russian behavior and restore Georgian territorial integrity.
Critical to this effort will be building ballast in a
U.S.-Russian relationship that serves as a break on Russia's
worst instincts. End Summary
Showdown Over Georgia?
----------------------
¶2. (C) If not carefully calibrated and deployed, a decision
to move towards a more robust military relationship with
Georgia has the very real potential to trigger a dispute on a
set of issues that are both neuralgic and strategic for the
Russian political and military establishment, endangering the
Administration's effort to undertake a fresh start with
Moscow. While Medvedev appears seized with taking charge of
the U.S.-Russian account and placing it on a new footing
during the July summit, this policy impulse will be
subordinate to Russia's "strategic interests" in its Eurasian
neighborhood, as defined by both Medvedev and Putin. Russian
intransigence on the UNOMIG rollover is a conspicuous
illustration of this. We cannot accept this Russian
calculus, but we need to understand what drives the Kremlin
and White House:
-- Russia places an "absolute" priority on expanding its
influence and deepening its integration with neighboring
states, as part of a self-conscious policy to combat the
West's "creep" towards its borders (ref a). Inevitably, the
question of Russia's status in the Eurasian "neighborhood,"
and the presumed zero-sum competition for influence along
Russia's borders, will remain our most contentious bilateral
issue and the likeliest stumbling block to improved
U.S.-Russian relations.
-- Russia opposes any further enlargement of NATO. The
August war in Georgia signaled Moscow's readiness to expend
materiel and men to achieve this goal, even at the cost of
international opprobrium. The fact that NATO membership for
both Georgia and Ukraine is not a front burner priority has
not tempered Moscow's stance, since the Russian leadership
sees this as a temporary reprieve, brought about by European
reservations and not by a change in policy by the Obama
Administration.
-- Absent a standstill agreement on NATO, which Medvedev
hopes to achieve through discussions over a new European
Security Treaty, Russia presumes that we seek its strategic
neutering. Our principled rejection of a Russian sphere of
influence is read here as a denial of Russia's status as a
great power, and another example of U.S. "double standards,"
rather than a repudiation of a Warsaw Pact mentality.
-- Russia judges that we lack the bilateral or multilateral
levers to coerce it into moderating its stance on Georgia or
reversing its recognition of the conflict territories.
Moscow assumes that we have too many strategic interests in
common to credibly threaten Russia with a cut-off in
relations -- a move that Europe (both old and new) never
MOSCOW 00001591 002 OF 003
seriously contemplated in the wake of the Georgian war.
-- Russian leaders enjoy a policy carte blanche on Georgia,
with respect to domestic public opinion. Polls consistently
show that Russians overwhelmingly welcome Moscow's resurgent
foreign policy, revile Saakashvili, and blame Euro-Atlantic
institutions for Moscow's worsening relations with former
republics and Warsaw Pact partners. There is absolutely no
difference between Medvedev and Putin when it comes to
Georgia.
Russian Warnings Over Mil-Mil Relations
---------------------------------------
¶3. (C) Russia has used the previously scheduled Cooperative
Longbow/Cooperative Lancer PfP exercises and U.S./NATO
discussions of Georgian military reform to hint at a
political price tag for continued cultivation of Georgia as a
NATO aspirant. While Russian Ambassador to NATO Rogozin's
characterization of the exercises as "an absurdity and
madness" were discounted in NATO circles, he accurately
channeled Moscow's anger over what was seen as a "business as
usual" policy towards Saakashvili, as well as Moscow's
strategy of raising the potential costs of participation by
other CIS states. Medvedev labeled the exercises
"muscle-flexing," an "outright provocation," and "a mistaken
and dangerous decision," while Putin questioned the "reset"
in U.S.-Russian relations, pointing to the exercises as a
"signal in a different direction." Even mild-mannered DFM
Ryabkov fulminated publicly against the "cheap and
unconvincing arguments" used to justify PfP. Pro-Kremlin and
opposition politicians emphasized that a "return to last
August" or a "new Cold War" might flow from a continued NATO
embrace of Tbilisi. Despite the harsh rhetoric, however,
Russia did not place its troops on alert during the
exercises, which proceeded smoothly.
¶4. (C) When it comes to weapons sales to Tbilisi, Russian
actions have been harsher. For those few Russian officials
willing to believe that the U.S. did not directly goad
Georgia into attacking, it is an article of faith that
Georgia's military relationship with the U.S. triggered
Saakashvili's fateful miscalculation on August 8. While
accusing Georgia of 30-fold increases in military spending
(at 7-8 percent of GDP), in addition to illicit purchases
from Ukrainian and Israeli middlemen, and an overconfidence
spawned by U.S. assurances of support, the GOR called for an
arms embargo against Georgia in the war's aftermath.
Invoking OSCE and UN conventions against the provision of
offensive weapons to conflict zones, Medvedev then
promulgated a January presidential decree allowing for
unilateral sanctions against countries that assist Tbilisi in
its "remilitarization." Both Medvedev and Putin appear to
believe that the U.S. already has supplied Tbilisi
surreptitiously with arms, which illustrates the invidious
role, as well as dominance, of the security services in
running Russian policy in the Caucasus.
A Better Focus: Economy, CBMS, and PfP
--------------------------------------
¶5. (C) From our perspective, the challenge is to
demonstrate that the U.S. will protect its legitimate
interests in the Caucasus -- including support for Georgian
sovereignty, territorial integrity and the democratically
elected government of Georgia -- without triggering a
tit-for-tat military escalation that we cannot win, but that
Georgia can surely lose. From our vantage point, a
burgeoning military supply relationship with Georgia is more
of a liability for Georgia than a benefit. It would do
nothing to secure a long-term resolution of Abkhazia and
South Ossetia, allowing Russia to "justify" its military
buildup in the conflict territories, increasing the
insecurities of the Abkhaz and South Ossetian populations
already distrustful of Saakashvili, and driving the
separatist leaders further into Moscow's arms. It would
almost certainly raise the temperature, rather than
maintaining the unsatisfactory status quo long enough for
economic development and confidence-building measures to chip
away at the current hostile standoff. The ramifications of a
policy clash on weapons sales could also be felt elsewhere,
with Moscow seizing a pretext to move forward on the delivery
of S-300s to Iran.
¶6. (C) As we have argued separately (ref b), the U.S. will
be most effective in countering Russian actions by acting in
concert with Europe to help Georgia demonstrate to the Abkhaz
and South Ossetians that autonomy with Tbilisi is better than
submission to Russia. Russian corruption, heavy-handedness
and reliance on criminalized local leaders ultimately will
MOSCOW 00001591 003 OF 003
play to Georgia's advantage. While Georgia cannot reconquer
its lost territory by force, it can establish itself as a
democratically vibrant and economically successful model for
the region. By keeping the international focus on economic
assistance to Tbilisi and on creating credible international
monitoring regimes, we can create the time and space to
intensify cooperation with Russia in other areas of strategic
interest, adding ballast to the U.S.-Russian relationship
that could make Moscow think twice about exacerbating
tensions in the Caucasus.
¶7. (C) This is not to say that the U.S. should be
constrained in providing bilateral non-lethal military
assistance, training, or other equipment clearly directed at
assisting Georgia's basic requirements to control its
borders, maintain law and order and counter terrorism. In
addition, we believe that PfP exercises and programs should
be pursued as part of the standard NATO toolbox for
cooperation with non-member states, notwithstanding Russian
rhetorical umbrage. The value of building Georgian capacity
for international peacekeeping, counter-narcotics,
civil-military emergency preparedness, and anti-terrorism
operations is obvious. PfP has the advantage of greater
transparency and reinforcing a common U.S.-European approach
to Georgia; conceivably, when relations stabilize, Russia
could be included as an observer. While Russian forces will
remain concentrated in the neighboring territories for the
near-term, our goal of securing a Russian drawdown and then
departure will not be accomplished through a U.S. military
sales relationship or lethal training program. Instead, we
should hold Medvedev accountable to the principles of his
European Security Treaty initiative, which are based on
respect for territorial integrity and sovereignty.
Comment: U.S.-Russia Relations Matter
-------------------------------------
¶8. (C) We in no way accede to Russian redlines by
acknowledging that Georgia could never win a military
confrontation with Russia, and should not be encouraged to
pursue a strategy that focuses on military force as the
underpinning to a stronger, more stable country. We
recognize that our suggested approach would be deeply
dissatisfying to Saakashvili, but we see no short-term fix to
the generational estrangement triggered by the August war and
no way to neutralize the advantages of geography, size, and
capabilities enjoyed by Russia. Instead, consistent and
coordinated initiatives by the U.S. and Europe to assist
Georgia, implement monitoring regimes, and persuade Russia to
engage credibly will be better advanced in an environment
where the U.S. and Russia are not in a hostile standoff. Our
assessment is that if we say "yes" to a significant military
relationship with Tbilisi, Russia will say "no" to any
medium-term diminution in tensions, and feel less constrained
absent reverting to more active opposition to critical U.S.
strategic interests.
BEYRLE