

Currently released so far... 12646 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AEMR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
ACOA
ASIG
AADP
AGR
ANET
ADPM
AMCHAMS
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BT
BP
BX
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CR
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CFED
CODEL
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CARSON
COPUOS
CIA
CL
CN
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
EPET
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
ENIV
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ENVR
ESENV
ENNP
ERNG
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
EXIM
ELECTIONS
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IT
IO
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IDP
IGAD
ILC
ITRA
ICTR
ITU
IBET
ITF
INRA
INRO
INTELSAT
IEFIN
IRC
IRAQI
ITALY
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INRB
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KSEP
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KIRF
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KSEO
KVPR
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KO
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCGC
KVIR
KFSC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KX
KMFO
KR
KMOC
KRIM
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KPAI
KICA
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MARAD
MG
MTRE
MASC
MW
MRCRE
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NGO
NR
NATIONAL
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OECD
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PDOV
PHUMPGOV
PCI
PTBS
PEL
PG
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
POGOV
POV
PRAM
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PMIL
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PRL
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
ROOD
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SPCE
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SNARCS
SH
SAARC
STEINBERG
SG
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SWE
SHI
SEN
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
TF
THPY
TP
TBID
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UNMIK
UY
UNCHR
UNO
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCND
UNCHC
UNCSD
USUN
USOAS
UNFCYP
USNC
UNIDROIT
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON88, NEW ZEALAND TO REDRAFT SECTION 92A OF NEW
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON88.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON88 | 2009-04-03 03:31 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO8351
PP RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0088/01 0930331
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 030331Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5818
INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 5483
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND PRIORITY 1943
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY PRIORITY 0822
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY 0294
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000088
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE PASS TO USPTO, U.S COPYRIGHT OFFICE, USTR JARED
RAGLAND, COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC/OIPR, STATE FOR EAP/ANP,
EEB/TPP/IPE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND TO REDRAFT SECTION 92A OF NEW
COPYRIGHT LAW
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: On March 23, New Zealand's Minister of
Commerce Simon Power announced that the GNZ would suspend
section 92A of the new copyright law, which would have
created new regulations for terminating internet accounts of
repeat copyright infringers. Negotiators for both the
intellectual property rights (IPR) industry and the
Telecommunications Carrier Forum (TCF - the association of
internet service providers (ISPs)) were surprised; they had
felt they were close to finalizing a voluntary code of
practice which would have served as the regulatory foundation
for enforcing this section of the law. Minister Power
decided that the proposed code might not be workable on a
voluntary basis, and therefore reasserted the government's
authority to redraft section 92A. In doing so he reaffirmed
the GNZ's commitment to the importance of IPR protection to
NZ's creative industries. It now will be crucial to monitor
the progress of GNZ redrafting to ensure it succeeds in a
timely manner. End Summary.
Background
----------
¶2. (SBU) The Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act 2008
was originally scheduled to go into full force on February
28, 2009 but in the weeks leading up to the deadline, public
interest groups raised a chorus of concerns claiming that the
law's requirement to terminate internet subscribers who
allegedly "pirated" digital copyrighted materials over the
internet would infringe on due process, freedom of speech and
the public's right to access information. The negative
publicity led to demonstrations staged in front of
Parliament, organized by a group called the Creative Freedom
Foundation.
¶3. (SBU) The publicity drew the attention of some minority
party politicians who hoped to ride a new populist wave. The
United Future Party's leader Peter Dunne wanted Parliament to
strike section 92A entirely from the new copyright bill
through an arcane legal maneuver which would have required
the Governor General to quash the provision. ACT Party
leader Rodney Hyde also joined in the chorus calling for
repeal of the section while he castigated the previous Labour
government for its "poor" drafting of the Bill. Both United
and ACT are current members of the National led coalition
government.
¶4. (SBU) In reaction, a core panel was formed within the
Cabinet consisting of the Commerce Minister Simon Power,
Communications/IT Minister Steven Joyce, Broadcasting
Minister Jonathan Coleman and Attorney General Chris
Finlayson to develop a game plan and dampen the negative
publicity. Meanwhile, Dunne had been asked by Simon Power to
consider reformulating the provision in language more
acceptable to the ISPs instead of stripping the law entirely
of its content.
¶5. (SBU) The response developed by the four ministers and
announced by Simon Power as lead was to suspend section 92A
for 30 days during which time the IP rights holders would
hammer out a code of practice with the Telecommunication
Carriers Forum (TCF - industry association representing NZ's
major ISPs - Telecom, Telstra, Vodafone, Kordia and Callplus)
which would serve as the regulatory foundation for section
92A. The law would then go into force at the end of March
and after 90 days it would be reviewed as to its appropriate
application.
Original Text of Section 92A
----------------------------
¶6. (U) Section 92A reads as follows:
Internet service providers (ISP) must have policy for
terminating accounts of repeat infringers
1) An ISP must adopt and reasonably implement a policy that
provides for termination, in appropriate circumstances, of
the account with that ISP of a repeat infringer.
2) In subsection (1), repeat infringer means a person who
repeatedly infringes the copyright in a work by using one (1)
or more of the Internet services of the ISP to do a
restricted act without the consent of the copyright owner.
WELLINGTON 00000088 002 OF 003
Telstra Pulls Out of Negotiations
---------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Telstra, one of the major New Zealand ISPs,
signaled during the week of March 9 that it was no longer
willing to participate in the negotiations between the
copyright industry and the TCF on development of the code of
practice that would have served as the regulatory foundation
for enforcing section 92A. Press reported rumors that
Telstra's decision to cease cooperation may have originated
from the company's CEO Sol Trujillo who has been reported as
an opponent of similar legislation in Australia. The TCF
tried to continue working on the draft code with the
remaining NZ ISPs (Telecom, Vodafone, Kordia and Callplus).
However, in accordance with the TCF's by laws, unless there
is unanimous agreement among all members of the
telecommunications forum then the code of practice would not
be binding but merely voluntary. After Telstra's opting-out,
the remaining stakeholders were unable to come to full
agreement on a useable code of practice. They remained
deadlocked on two "minor" items: how to deal with fees (costs
imposed on rights holder for submitting termination requests)
and the length of time before termination (time between
notice of infraction and cancellation of internet service -
one versus two month lead-time).
GNZ Decides to Rewrite Section 92A
----------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) Minister Power, realizing that the proposed code of
practice could only be voluntary and not applicable to the
second largest ISP in NZ (Telstra) along with the end of
March deadline rapidly approaching, suspended the
negotiations and reasserted the government's authority to
redraft section 92A. In his announcement, Power stressed
that section 92A traverses an important issue in copyright
law reform and reaffirmed the GNZ's stance that internet
piracy is very costly to NZ's creative industries and needs
to be addressed.
¶9. (SBU) On March 23, Minister Power, issued a press release
after the weekly Cabinet meeting announcing that the GNZ
would suspend section 92A as of March 31. (Note: all other
provisions of the new copyright law are in force as of March
31 except but for section 92A. End note). The Government's
action came as a surprise because up to the time of the
Minister's announcement negotiators for both the IPR industry
and the Telecommunications Carrier Forum had said they were
close to finalizing a "voluntary" code of practice.
IPR Industry Expresses Disappointment
-------------------------------------
¶10. (SBU) On March 26, Charge' met with Frank Rittman, Vice
President and General Counsel for Asia Pacific Division of
the Motion Picture Association (MPA) and Tony Eaton, Director
of New Zealand Federation Against Copyright Theft (NZFACT) to
ascertain the IPR industry's reaction to suspension of
section 92A of the NZ Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment
Act 2008 and possible next steps by government, copyright
holders and internet service
providers.
¶11. (SBU) Rittman and Eaton had met earlier with the IP
division of Ministry of Economic Development (MED) charged
with the redraft of Section 92A. MED officials' chief
concern was that MED did not yet have clear instructions from
its political leadership, primarily from the Minister of
Commerce, as to timeline and process. Rittman felt that the
sense of urgency among the IP lawyers in MED was relatively
low and believed that a redraft was unlikely any time sooner
than late December 2009. As to the redrafting process, he
felt that the public's input would be sought - most likely to
diffuse the earlier criticism of lack of transparency in the
original formulation of 92A. Rittman said that the drafters
would need to satisfactorily address four main points:
- Resolve satisfactorily the question of indemnification
(i.e., who bears costs of improper termination).
- Agree to definition of what constitutes an ISP.
WELLINGTON 00000088 003 OF 003
- Ensure that process for notification and termination be
"timely" (IP industry asking for one month between final
warning and termination of internet service while ISPs
seeking two month lead-time).
- Determine who bears processing costs (there is the cost of
processing the notifications to customers for alleged misuse
estimated at approx NZ$100 per notification - will it be
shared or carried by ISPs).
Next Steps
----------
¶12. (SBU) Throughout the final stages of the law's (near)
implementation, the Embassy continued to met with IPR
stakeholders and GNZ officials to ascertain progress and
encourage resolution. To determine how a "workable" section
92A provision can be secured, Econoff met with Rory McLeod,
Director at Ministry of Economic Development (MED) with
responsibility for IPR within GNZ along with Paula Wilson,
Deputy Director for Trade Negotiations at MFAT, and was given
assurance that the government remains committed to redrafting
Section 92A.
¶13. (SBU) Embassy will continue to stress with GNZ officials
the need for a shorter rather than protracted timeline for
the redraft and will ascertain the details of a notice and
comment period for public submissions once released by GNZ.
During this hiatus we've proposed holding DVC(s) between NZ
and U.S. interlocutors to possibly help with drafting and as
a public diplomacy tool to dispel public misperceptions about
proper role of IPR protection. U.S. agencies have the
benefit of 10 years worth of experience in enforcing the U.S.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act that may serve useful to New
Zealand officials in their effort to implement section 92A.
KEEGAN