

Currently released so far... 12646 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AEMR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
ACOA
ASIG
AADP
AGR
ANET
ADPM
AMCHAMS
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BT
BP
BX
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CR
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CFED
CODEL
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CARSON
COPUOS
CIA
CL
CN
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
EPET
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
ENIV
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ENVR
ESENV
ENNP
ERNG
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
EXIM
ELECTIONS
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IT
IO
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IDP
IGAD
ILC
ITRA
ICTR
ITU
IBET
ITF
INRA
INRO
INTELSAT
IEFIN
IRC
IRAQI
ITALY
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INRB
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KSEP
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KIRF
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KSEO
KVPR
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KO
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCGC
KVIR
KFSC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KX
KMFO
KR
KMOC
KRIM
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KPAI
KICA
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MARAD
MG
MTRE
MASC
MW
MRCRE
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NGO
NR
NATIONAL
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OECD
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PDOV
PHUMPGOV
PCI
PTBS
PEL
PG
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
POGOV
POV
PRAM
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PMIL
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PRL
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
ROOD
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SPCE
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SNARCS
SH
SAARC
STEINBERG
SG
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SWE
SHI
SEN
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
TF
THPY
TP
TBID
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UNMIK
UY
UNCHR
UNO
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCND
UNCHC
UNCSD
USUN
USOAS
UNFCYP
USNC
UNIDROIT
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE497, U.S.-CHILEAN JOINT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSISTANCE LAUNCHES IN
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE497.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE497 | 2009-06-17 12:35 | 2011-03-21 16:30 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0497/01 1681235
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 171235Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0930
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 0461
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000497
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC:MROONEY AND AWONG, EEB/IFD/ODF
TREASURY FOR LMCDONALD, DVKOCH, AND SSENICH
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EFIN EINV PGOV PREL CS CI
SUBJECT: U.S.-CHILEAN JOINT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSISTANCE LAUNCHES IN
COSTA RICA
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. From May 18-21, a Treasury Department team from the Office of
Technical Assistance (OTA) met with Costa Rican government leaders
and private sector officials to consider how to meet Costa Rica's
national infrastructure challenges. The meetings represented the
first step of Treasury's and the Government of Chile's (GOC) joint
Infrastructure Finance Experts Corps (IFEC) project, which aims to
bring expert advice on financing, tendering, managing, and operating
infrastructure projects with an emphasis on public-private
partnerships (PPP). The two parties chose Costa Rica as a pilot
country for the project in late 2008. Three weeks after the OTA
team visit, a Chilean delegation -- plus two OTA Advisors --
conducted a two-day trip featuring meetings and a successful
half-day seminar on infrastructure PPPs.
¶2. After the week of OTA meetings, three areas for framing a
working relationship between the OTA, the GOC, and the GOCR emerged:
(1) identification of specific projects for OTA and GOC assistance
and delineation of specific roles for the OTA and the GOC; (2)
strengthening the work of the GOCR's Council of Concessions, a
multi-ministerial body charged with decision-making on
infrastructure projects; and (3) promoting the success of
concessions in Costa Rica, a country struggling to make strides in
implementing successful concession-driven infrastructure projects.
This "first draft" of work areas for the IFEC project in Costa Rica
will likely be revised as the initiative evolves. As a backdrop for
next steps, the Chilean seminar underscored key elements for
successful PPPs including legislative and contract flexibility,
dispute resolution, and liberating public resources. The OTA
anticipates a second visit with the Chileans in July to advance the
IFEC project. This unusual tri-national effort may prove to be an
important catalyst for developing Costa Rica's creaky
infrastructure. END SUMMARY.
--------------------------------------------- --
ACT ONE, SCENE ONE (THE OTA VISIT): THE PLAYERS
--------------------------------------------- --
¶3. OTA Advisors Harry Tether and Barry Gray traveled to Costa Rica
for four days of meetings commencing on May 18. Treasury Deputy
Assistant Secretary Larry McDonald joined for part of the visit.
The OTA team met with a wide variety of players in Costa Rican
infrastructure, including:
-- Guillermo Zuniga Chaves, Minister of Finance (Hacienda), Jose
Adrian Vargas, Treasurer, Juan Carlos Pacheco, Director, and Melvin
Quiros, Deputy Director, Public Credit, Hacienda;
-- Javier Cascante, Director, Superindentency of Pensions (SUPEN);
-- Ronald Vargas, Banco Nacional;
-- Jose Luis Valenciano (PLN), National Assembly member and Chairman
of the Finance Committee;
-- Rocio Aguilar, Contraloria (Comptroller) of the GOCR;
-- Guillermo Matamoros, Vice Minister of Concessions, and Pedro Luis
Castro, Vice Minister, MOPT Ministry of Public Works and
Transportation (MOPT);
-- Luis Gamboa (Vedova & Obando), President, and Lynda Solar,
Executive Director, Costa Rican-American Chamber of Commerce
(AmCham);
-- Charles Spalding (Trelex), Alonso Arroyo (KPMG), Jose Antonio
Munoz (Arias and Munoz), and William Merrigan (P&G), Board Members,
AmCham;
-- Jeff Scheferman, President/CEO, and Greg Huang, Vice President of
Finance, ADC/HAS (a U.S.-Canadian-Brazilian consortium vying to
purchase the operating and development rights to the San Jose
airport);
-- Eduardo Sibaja, Minister of Economy, Industry, and Commerce
(MEIC);
-- Ambassador Gonzalo Mendoza Negri and Esteban Cordova Tapia,
International Cooperation Counselor, Embassy of Chile;
-- Mariela Diaz, Director, and Cecilia Montero, Manager, ProChile;
-- Carlos Jaraquemada Valle, Administrative and Finance Director,
Antonio Alonso Jimenez, Project Director, Autopistas del Sol (a
Spanish-led consortium constructing and operating a highway
concession in San Jose);
-- Pedro Pablo Quiros, Chief Executive Officer, Instituto de
Costariccense Electricidad (ICE), the national electric and
telecommunications authority,
-- Rodolfo Lizano Rojas, Legal Director, AyA (the national water
authority); and
-- Fernando Quevado, Country Representative, InterAmerican
Development Bank.
-------------------------------------------
ACT ONE, SCENE ONE HIGHLIGHTS I: THUMBS UP
-------------------------------------------
¶4. MEIC Minister Sibaja concisely summarized the GOCR's challenge
with infrastructure: "We need to do concessions as we do not have
the resources in the government to fund infrastructure
improvements." The Minister noted the need to highlight concession
success given Costa Rica's history of failing to implement
concession projects without legal wrangling and/or a breakdown in
project execution. Though Costa has two successful concessions --
Puerto Caldera (the country's secondary port located on the
Pacific), and the newly-expanded San Jose-Caldera highway (a work in
progress) -- the general populace believes that concessions are a
troubled, if not doomed, process, based on experiences with the San
Jose airport, the Limon-Moin port, and a planned prison
privatization. Also, there is lingering suspicion, fueled by
opponents and especially the public sector unions, that concessions
represent a "give-away" of valuable public assets to the private
sector.
¶5. MOPT Vice Minister Matamoros welcomed the proposed IFEC process
by stating, "We (GOCR) need you to start yesterday." Matamoros also
made several observations about the concession process in Costa Rica
touching on the lack of expert capacity and problems with acquiring
materials; the grating differences between the operating speed of
the Costa Rican system (slow) and concessionaires (fast); the
potential of using bond funds for financing projects; and the need
for a better expropriation law for purchasing land. The meetings
with Autopistas del Sol (the Caldera highway concessionaire) and
ADC/HAS (poised to take over the languishing San Jose airport
project on July 1) confirmed many of the Vice Minister's
observations.
¶6. Minister Zuniga emphasized, as did DAS Treasury McDonald, Costa
Rica's need to follow the route of concessions, address the sluggish
pace of project implementation, find solutions to inter-governmental
coordination (including with the legislature and the Comptroller),
and improve ministerial capacity to evaluate projects. The Minister
expounded on the special challenges of the Council of Concessions, a
GOCR "inter-ministerial" board comprised of the Ministers of MOPT,
Hacienda and Planning; the President of the Central Bank; and the
Technical Society (private sector representatives). Participation
at Council meetings is erratic and there is scant lead time for
ministers to assess projects in advance.
---------------------------------------------
ACT ONE, SCENE ONE HIGHLIGHTS II: CHALLENGES
---------------------------------------------
¶7. Comptroller Aguilar occupies a controversial post in Costa Rica
as her office has grown into an increasingly (and perhaps overly)
powerful body in recent years. Appointed by the National Assembly,
the Comptroller
can both forecast a project's viability and later audit the same
project, but without responsibility of having to answer to the
(in)accuracy of the original forecast. That responsibility lies
with the "sponsoring" ministry, which in turn seeks to avoid
problems by deferring to the Comptroller's Office from the outset.
As other public officials told OTA and the Chileans, the Comptroller
thus accumulates decision-making authority for ministries by
default, since mid-level staffs willingly defer decisions to the
Comptroller to avoid responsibility for their own decisions (and
possible legal action against them).
¶8. Thus, the Comptroller operates as a shadow of the executive and
legislative branches, using its resident expertise in law,
engineering, auditing, finance, and public administration to
"legally" second guess either or both on decisions. Yet, the
Comptroller does not desire its now-elevated profile. Aguilar noted
that the Comptroller might be subject to "less criticism" if its
function were more operational and less focused on the evaluation of
program results.
¶9. Chilean Ambassador Mendoza voiced his exasperation with
governmental progress in Costa Rica, using both the CAFTA saga and
concessions as "poster child" examples. The Ambassador urged the
participants in IFEC to promote and publicize positive
infrastructure news. A similar challenge existed in Chile, he
explained, but the GOC steadfastly changed prevailing public opinion
through skillful public relations and successful project execution.
---------------------------------------------
ACT ONE, SCENE ONE HIGHLIGHTS III: FINANCING
---------------------------------------------
¶10. Ronald Vargas, Banco Nacional's (BNCR) investment bank
director, described the "fidiecomiso," or trust structure, for
creating public-private partnerships. For each project, BNCR
establishes a trust, which issues bonds on the local market,
purchases land, hires contractors, and constructs the capital asset.
The trust then leases the asset to a government agency. Once the
trust pays the bondholders, BNCR will dissolve the trust and
transfer the asset to an agency. As examples, Vargas cited two
successful power plant projects: Penas Blancas (USD 70 million),
near the Nicaraguan border, and Cariblanco (USD 170 million), in the
mountains northeast of San Jose. Both were built for the state-owned
Electrical Institute (ICE). The limited local capital market and
the Comptroller's initial skepticism towards the trust framework
represented two major challenges, however. Vargas believes that
project success established the credibility of the concept and
demonstrated how future projects can clear approval hurdles. (To
date, BNCR has financed four projects with the "fidiecomiso" scheme
valued at USD 295 million and has new project approvals valued at
USD 470 million).
¶11. SUPEN Director Cascante indicated that the Costa Rican capital
market can absorb future bond offerings. He supports the Pension
Funds' use of bonds issued by infrastructure trusts, underscoring
the Funds' growing financing potential manifested by annual
increases of USD 200-250 million. Pension funds can invest heavily
in trusts pioneered by BNCR's Ronald Vargas because those projects
are classified as "private" -- even though they finance
infrastructure that will become public once the trust pays off the
bonds. Costa Rican law limits the pension funds to invest 60
percent of their funds in GOCR bonds. There is no similar limit for
private bonds.
--------------------------------------------- ------
ACT ONE, SCENE TWO (THE CHILEAN VISIT): THE PLAYERS
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶12. Representatives from the GOC visited Costa Rica June 8-9 for
meetings and a half-day seminar. Treasury OTA Advisors Steven
Hochman and Jeanine Corvetto participated in both the meetings and
the seminar. Hosted by the Chilean Embassy and ProChile (a GOC
trade promotion agency), the Chilean Delegation included the
following:
-- Juan Eduardo Saldivia, Subsecretario, Ministerio de Obras
Publicas (MOP);
-- Leonel Vivallos, Coordinador de Concessiones, MOP;
-- Ivan Martens, Agencia de Cooperacion Internacional de Chile; and
-- Javier Hurtado, Director, Camara de la Construccion Chile.
As with the TREAS OTA team in May, the Chilean delegation and OTA
Advisors met VM Matamoros and Comptroller Aguilar. Additional
officials included Hacienda Vice Minister Jenny Phillips, Director
Randall Murillo and some ten members of the Chamber of Construction,
a Board member of the Council of Concessions, and a mayor of a city
adjacent to San Jose.
--------------------------------------------- ----
ACT ONE, SCENE TWO HIGHLIGHTS I: SEMINAR SUCCESS
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶13. At the June 9 seminar, the Chilean delegation highlighted for
the 70-member audience Chile's impressive PPP accomplishments across
a diverse range of projects, including highways, airports, stadiums,
prisons, public buildings, and intermodal transfer stations. Key
recommendations included legislative and contract flexibility,
guaranteed financing, practical regulations, creditor protection,
agreement on risk assignment, and a dispute resolution process.
Repeatedly, the delegation stressed the concession advantage as
increasing competiveness and productivity, liberating public
resources (for social investment), and spurring private sector
innovation. Under the rubric of IFEC, the Chileans want to make a
difference and project their success elsewhere in the Americas.
¶14. The OTA Advisors presented both the advantages and
disadvantages of PPPs when compared to traditional approaches while
noting how PPPs are an important additional tool for developing
infrastructure. They also noted the importance of achieving an
appropriate allocation of risk between the public and private
partners when creating a PPP.
---------------------------------------------
ACT ONE, SCENE TWO HIGHLIGHTS II: CHALLENGES
---------------------------------------------
¶15. In meetings with the Comptroller and the GOC, the two OTA
Advisors concluded that the Comptroller's Office takes a more
skeptical view of the concessions/PPP approach than does the Finance
Ministry, a possible source of friction as the IFEC initiative
develops. Also, in the mayoral meeting, we learned that the
municipal sector sorely lacks the resources for infrastructure
development and thus welcomes the PPP approach as an opportunity to
bolster public services.
-----------------------------------
ACT ONE, BOTH SCENES: THE PRODUCERS
-----------------------------------
¶16. Treasury OTA found supporting funds for the OTA's participation
in IFEC within Treasury. The Chileans dedicated funds to support
their part of the program, independent of U.S. funds. In
anticipation of the project moving forward, the Chileans started
working with VM Matamoros well in advance of the OTA visit to Costa
Rica.
--------
COMMENTS
--------
¶17. The OTA team and the Embassy identified three near- term issues
for future meetings and work: (1) collaborating with the GOCR to
select specific IFEC project(s) and define specific areas of focus
for the IEFC team; (2) increasing the effectiveness of the Council
of Concessions; and (3) publicizing concession and public-private
partnership successes. The Chilean emphasis on how to structure
successful PPPs, while acknowledging problems, can provide vital,
practical, and experience-based assistance to the GOCR and its
turgid legal and governing system. The generally positive GOCR view
of Chile as a model to emulate in many areas may also help.
¶18. On the other hand, the messy business of inter-ministerial and
inter-agency coordination in Costa Rica -- with the Comptroller's
Office in a pivotal and disproportionately powerful position --
remains an exogenous drag on any public works project, with or
without PPPs. Throw in the Comptroller's protracted and excessively
deliberative due diligence, which is compounded by Costa Rica's
hyper-legalism and penchant for "perfect consensus," and systemic
solutions become daunting and elusive. Nevertheless, we view IFEC
as one promising solution to Costa Rica's infrastructure woes.
CIANCHETTE