

Currently released so far... 12646 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AEMR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
ACOA
ASIG
AADP
AGR
ANET
ADPM
AMCHAMS
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BT
BP
BX
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CR
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CFED
CODEL
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CARSON
COPUOS
CIA
CL
CN
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
EPET
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
ENIV
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ENVR
ESENV
ENNP
ERNG
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
EXIM
ELECTIONS
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IT
IO
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IDP
IGAD
ILC
ITRA
ICTR
ITU
IBET
ITF
INRA
INRO
INTELSAT
IEFIN
IRC
IRAQI
ITALY
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INRB
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KSEP
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KIRF
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KSEO
KVPR
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KO
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCGC
KVIR
KFSC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KX
KMFO
KR
KMOC
KRIM
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KPAI
KICA
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MARAD
MG
MTRE
MASC
MW
MRCRE
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NGO
NR
NATIONAL
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OECD
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PDOV
PHUMPGOV
PCI
PTBS
PEL
PG
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
POGOV
POV
PRAM
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PMIL
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PRL
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
ROOD
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SPCE
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SNARCS
SH
SAARC
STEINBERG
SG
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SWE
SHI
SEN
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
TF
THPY
TP
TBID
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UNMIK
UY
UNCHR
UNO
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCND
UNCHC
UNCSD
USUN
USOAS
UNFCYP
USNC
UNIDROIT
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON102, NEW ZEALAND'S $1.5NZ BILLION BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON102.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON102 | 2009-04-22 03:03 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO5667
RR RUEHAG RUEHCHI RUEHDF RUEHFK RUEHHM RUEHIK RUEHKSO RUEHLZ RUEHNAG
RUEHPB RUEHRN RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHWL #0102/01 1120303
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 220303Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5840
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1953
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5497
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0832
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 0297
RUEAFCC/FCC WASHINGTON DC
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUEHZU/ASIAN PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION
RUEHSS/OECD POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000102
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/ANP, EEB/CIP/BA FOR TIM FINTON, AND DOC/ITA/OTEC FOR
ANDREW BENNETT
STATE PASS TO FCC ROBERT TANNER
STATE PASS TO NTIA
STATE PASS TO PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECPS ECON NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND'S $1.5NZ BILLION BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT
INITIATIVE
Ref: State 27310
WELLINGTON 00000102 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) Summary. In March, Communications and Information
Technology Minister Steven Joyce unveiled plans for GNZ to offer up
to NZ$1.5 billion for building high-speed broadband infrastructure
to cover seventy-five percent of New Zealand. A Crown-owned
investment company is expected, along with private sector partners,
to invest a total of NZ$3 billion into "regional fiber companies"
which will install fiber-optic networks throughout New Zealand's top
25 most densely populated cities and towns. The effort is part of
the government's attempt to marry an overall fiscal stimulus package
with investment in new technology to produce long-range economic and
commercial benefits. The GNZ admits that there are challenges for
the success of the initiative and the Labour opposition has already
slammed the plan as a waste of tax payer money. End Summary.
GNZ to Invest NZ$1.5 Billion in Broadband
-----------------------------------------
¶2. (U) At the end of March, Communications and Information
Technology Minister Steven Joyce unveiled plans to create a
Crown-owned investment company known as the "Crown Fibre Investment
Co" (CFIC) with a mandate to invest up to NZ$1.5 billion of
government funds for building high-speed broadband infrastructure
throughout New Zealand. CFIC will, alongside private sector
investors, put money into "regional fiber companies" that will
install fiber-optic networks in 25 New Zealand towns and cities.
¶3. (U) The effort comes as part of the government's attempt to
marry an overall fiscal stimulus package with investment in new
technology which it hopes will generate long-range economic and
commercial benefits. The new company's goal is to boost broadband
speeds to 100 megabits per second - more than 50 times faster than
speeds currently available - by connecting fiber-optic cables to
homes and businesses. The money will be dispersed via private
companies on a regional basis in a series of "Public-Private
Partnerships." A feasibility study commissioned by the NZ Treasury
and conducted by Milner Consulting Ltd. projects that total fixed
investment (infrastructure costs) required to connect seventy-five
percent of urban New Zealand is expected to range between NZ$2.6 and
NZ$3.3 billion.
Seventy-five Percent of New Zealand to be Connected
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶4. (U) The 25 (initial) centers identified are based on population
and range from Auckland, with 1.2 million people, to Oamaru, with
population of 12,681. Once finished, the GNZ hopes this investment
model "will deliver on the government's commitment of ultra fast
broadband to 75 percent of New Zealanders where they live, work and
study over the next ten years," said Joyce. Those towns or rural
areas outside this initial group would eventually get "improved"
internet services but that would occur in the second phase of the
initiative. The more remote regions could expect eventual upgrades
to broadband but they would not have the fiber enabling the
ultra-fast broadband, said Joyce.
Commerce Commission Report on Current NZ Broadband
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶5. (U) Apart from the CFIC initiative, the New Zealand Commerce
Commission's latest report claims that the quality of current
broadband services improved greatly by end of 2008. The Commerce
Commission released its report just days after the government
announced the CFIC initiative. The report, drafted by IDC
Consultants and Epitiro (consulting firms contracted by Commerce
Commission), claims that Telecom, TelstraClear DSL, Vodafone, Orcon
and Slingshot (firms with the largest share of the current NZ
internet market) have boosted their broadband scores by between 99
percent and 166 percent over the course of 2008. Most of this was
due to investment in their current networks and additional
improvements stemmed from the inclusion of ADSL2+ technology
(Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line - a data communications
technology that enables faster data transmission over copper
telephone lines).
WELLINGTON 00000102 002.2 OF 003
¶6. (U) As of June 2008, New Zealand ranked 19 out of 30 OECD
countries in terms of numbers of broadband connections, with about
20 broadband subscribers per 100 of population. Total broadband
connections, including fixed and wireless connections, had reached
915,000 by December 31, 2008. The overall quality of broadband
services has also improved, with major internet service providers
investing in extra network capacity. Nearly 60 per cent of digital
subscriber line (DSL) connections had now been upgraded to the newer
and faster ADSL2+.
Likely Investors Reviewing GNZ Proposal
---------------------------------------
¶7. (U) An internal report (Castalia consultants) commissioned by
the three largest telecommunications firms in NZ - Telecom, Vodafone
and TelstraClear - said their own investment plans would deliver
broadband speeds adequate for the needs of everyday internet users
without the need for a boost from the Government. Castalia
challenged the belief that high broadband speeds for households - up
to 50 times faster than what is presently available - would deliver
significant economic benefits.
¶8. (U) Telecom (largest NZ telecommunication firm) has set up an
internal "think tank" to formulate its response to the Government's
NZ$1.5 billion plan. Sources suggest there is still internal debate
within Telecom about the implications of the government plan.
"Telecom will be reviewing the opportunities the initiative presents
to work with the proposed CFIC to extend the reach of Telecom's own
ultra-fast broadband network, and to utilize the fiber networks
others may build," said chief executive Paul Reynolds. Reynolds
further opined that Telecom "looked forward to working with
government funding to complement the government's plans to take fast
broadband even further, including to those areas that currently are
not commercially viable." Telecom's current share of the retail
broadband market has slipped to 57 percent, down from 61 per cent in
¶2007.
¶9. (U) In addition to the traditional telecommunication firms
considering the CFIC's offer, Auckland-based Vector Energy is also
likely to be a prime candidate to join up with the new investment
company CFIC in rolling out fiber optic cables to homes and
businesses. Vector currently has 500km of fiber optic network laid
in Auckland's business districts and is expanding that network by an
extra 300km as part of an agreement with Vodafone.
Endorsements
------------
¶10. (U) Much of the GNZ's current CFIC plan was based on a March
2008 study by the Auckland-based New Zealand Institute entitled,
"Assessing New Zealand's Current Broadband Path: The Need for
Change." The NZ Institute concluded that the current state of NZ
broadband was insufficient. The NZ Institute maintained that the
announced investment by the major telecoms would not take NZ far
enough fast enough. Despite the dominant investor (Telecom) making
significant investments in fiber-optic, it had insufficient
commercial incentive to roll it out rapidly. Finally, the longer NZ
took to roll out its fiber-optic upgrade, the more costly it would
become thus shutting out all but the major urban centers.
¶11. (U) CFIC's plans have been favorably welcomed by the
Telecommunications Users Association, TUANZ. "The Minister's paper
is at the top end of our expectations," said TUANZ's chief executive
Ernie Newman. "It sets out a clear structure for the proposed
partnerships, and will give potential partners in the private sector
all the information they need to come up with regionally-based
proposals." Newman said the plan appeared to be "sector-neutral" -
meaning it opened the way for a wide range of potential co-investors
including telecommunications companies, power line companies, or
regional groupings. This was important, said Newman, as a greater
diversity of investors were "showing their hands and broadening the
range of innovative, cost-effective solutions."
Criticism of the Plan
---------------------
WELLINGTON 00000102 003.2 OF 003
¶12. (U) Labour Party's Finance spokesman David Cunliffe accused the
Government of "performing a NZ$1.5 billion back flip." He said the
scheme largely mirrored the approach of Labour's NZ$325 million
Broadband Investment Fund (BIF), which the Government scrapped, but
was more wasteful of taxpayers' dollars. Minister Joyce responded,
saying the Government's plan differed from Labour's in three key
respects: its sheer size, the Government's investment in fiber
providers instead of handing out subsidies, and its focus on fiber
to the home, rather than a mix of other technologies such as
wireless and/or satellite broadband.
¶13. (U) The Government conceded that there was a risk that private
investors might not come forward with their share of the NZ$3
billion, that this might not be enough to provide the desired
network coverage, and that local fiber companies might fail. Laws
might be changed to make it easier for contractors to string cables
on power and telephone poles, and to lay fiber in "micro-trenches"
cut in roads. Tim Davin, policy manager at the Institute for
Professional Engineers, said 25,000 kilometers of cabling would be
needed. New Zealand did not have enough trained engineers to build
the network, but some could be brought in from overseas, he said.
Comment
-------
¶14. (SBU) Despite the contested nature of the high-speed broadband
debate, most seem to agree that the best way forward for NZ is
through the Government's proposed collaborative approach. There are
a number of technical issues yet to be worked through and engaging
with the country's major telecoms will help the GNZ to form a
clearer roadmap towards developing an effective plan for the
proposed NZ$1.5 billion in spending. The GNZ's commitment to invest
in New Zealand's broadband infrastructure clearly demonstrates the
importance the National-led government attaches to state-of-the art
information and communication technologies (ICT) as an enabler of
business and a driver of international competitiveness. To date,
too much of the broadband debate in NZ has focused on the "last
mile" of infrastructure and centered on broadband access alone.
Faster broadband will eventually encourage developments in areas
such as eHealth (real time remote healthcare monitoring and
diagnosis) and education through improved research and
communications technologies and enhanced distance learning - all of
which were National Party campaign promises. End Comment.
KEEGAN