

Currently released so far... 12646 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AEMR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
ACOA
ASIG
AADP
AGR
ANET
ADPM
AMCHAMS
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BT
BP
BX
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CR
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CFED
CODEL
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CARSON
COPUOS
CIA
CL
CN
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
EPET
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
ENIV
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ENVR
ESENV
ENNP
ERNG
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
EXIM
ELECTIONS
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IT
IO
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IDP
IGAD
ILC
ITRA
ICTR
ITU
IBET
ITF
INRA
INRO
INTELSAT
IEFIN
IRC
IRAQI
ITALY
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INRB
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KSEP
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KIRF
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KSEO
KVPR
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KO
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCGC
KVIR
KFSC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KX
KMFO
KR
KMOC
KRIM
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KPAI
KICA
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MARAD
MG
MTRE
MASC
MW
MRCRE
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NGO
NR
NATIONAL
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OECD
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PDOV
PHUMPGOV
PCI
PTBS
PEL
PG
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
POGOV
POV
PRAM
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PMIL
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PRL
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
ROOD
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SPCE
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SNARCS
SH
SAARC
STEINBERG
SG
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SWE
SHI
SEN
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
TF
THPY
TP
TBID
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UNMIK
UY
UNCHR
UNO
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCND
UNCHC
UNCSD
USUN
USOAS
UNFCYP
USNC
UNIDROIT
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07BERLIN244, JANUARY 23 MEETING OF G-8 GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07BERLIN244.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07BERLIN244 | 2007-02-07 10:41 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Berlin |
VZCZCXYZ0014
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHRL #0244/01 0381041
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 071041Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6948
INFO RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 7911
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1693
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0953
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 8436
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 0190
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 1363
UNCLAS BERLIN 000244
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR ISN/CTR, EUR, WHA/CAN, AND EAP/J
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL ETTC KNNP CBW TRGY GM JA RS CA
SUBJECT: JANUARY 23 MEETING OF G-8 GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP
WORKING GROUP IN BERLIN
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The G-8 Global Partnership Working Group
(GPWG) met January 23 in Berlin under the German Presidency.
The Chair informed partners that the next meeting, February
27-28, would focus on the mid-term review of the 10-year
Global Partnership (GP) program, with the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and NGOs being invited to attend.
The Chair then addressed preparations for a review and
assessment report of the GP's first five years, noting the
need to produce a review prior to the June 6-8 G-8 Summit.
After the Chair requested responses to a German-produced
questionnaire and a French-prepared matrix of GP projects,
the Russian delegation stated it opposed any reference in a
GP document to Russia as "a proliferation threat." Following
that discussion, the group discussed the review document and
the status of Chemical Weapons Destruction (CWD) projects in
Russia, with the Russian delegation complaining about the
slow pace of receiving funds. The Russian delegation next
gave a presentation on removing and securing Radioisotopic
Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs), and the group discussed the
status of decommissioning and dismantling Russian nuclear
submarines. Canada's delegation announced the construction
of a biosecurity facility in Bishkek; the U.S. delegation
raised the issue of the future of the science centers in
Russia and Ukraine. The Chair closed with the announcement
that Germany would send procedural information concerning the
review process to the delegations and requested they consider
options for presenting the review report at the G-8 Summit.
End Summary.
¶2. (SBU) German MFA Commissioner for Economic Affairs and
Sustainable Development Viktor Elbling chaired the opening
session and began by informing the delegations that the
GPWG's February 27 session will include presentations by NGOs
or other invitees selected from a list of proposed invitees
by GP members. Elbling also announced that Germany had
invited the IAEA to give a general overview of the global
threat of unsecured nuclear material, that Germany's Federal
Intelligence Service (BND) will contribute a segment on the
threat of nuclear material to Germany's overall presentation,
and that all partners are invited to include input from their
intelligence services in their presentations. He added that
the think tank, Foundation for Science and Policy, (Stiftung
fuer Wissenschaft und Politik, SWP), is the German NGO
designated to address the first day of February's session.
Elbling asked all members to respond by January 31 with their
proposed invitees. With little discussion, it was agreed
that GP donor states will also be invited to send proposed
NGO participants.
¶3. (SBU) Elbling turned to the major item for consideration,
the review/assessment report of the GP's first five years.
To encourage a structured discussion, he requested responses
to a previously circulated German-produced questionnaire and
a French-produced matrix evaluation scheme. French Delegate
Camille Grand suggested the matrix might be useful as a
quantitative tool for assessing the progress of GP projects.
Before discussion could begin, Russian Delegate Anatoly
Antonov said Russia would not permit any GP document to refer
to Russia "as a proliferation threat." Antonov reiterated
the statement several times and mentioned dissatisfaction
with the status of the CWD projects in Russia. He claimed
contributors to the CWD projects are lagging in their
allocation of funds and added Russia could not support the
German-produced questionnaire. Nevertheless, Antonov
insisted Russia wanted to improve cooperation with members on
CWD.
¶4. (SBU) The British, Canadian, French, EU Commission, and
Italian delegates, along with Deputy Assistant Secretary
Semmel, all acknowledged Russia's concerns about the slow
pace of some projects' funding, but reaffirmed their
continued commitment to all projects under way. The
delegates agreed the review/assessment was the basis for
moving the GP forward during the next five years and beyond
and said Russia would not be singled out as a "proliferation
threat." Italian Delegate Antonio Catalano pointed out that
Russia itself has voiced concerns over the CWD program,
thereby acknowledging concerns over proliferation on its
territory.
¶5. (SBU) Antonov continued, however, despite comments from
partners that emphasized the common threats faced by all
states. He claimed the U.S. has only given 10 percent of its
pledged amount for CWD. Noting the proliferation threats
around the world, including in the U.S., DAS Semmel pointed
out that pledged funds are not disbursed all at once but in
incremental amounts, typically annually, in accordance with
government budgets. He said the proper calculation is not
the percentage spent of the total pledged amount but the
percentage of funds made available by donor countries up to
that point.
¶6. (SBU) After Elbling brought the discussion back to the
review document, the delegates generally agreed the document
must be succinct and clear to leaders and the public. DAS
Semmel urged that members use the review to reflect on GPWG
assumptions. He suggested that as the review process
continues, some surprises may lie ahead and the members will
be compelled to consider what happens after the GP program
ends in 2012.
¶7. (SBU) At this point, German MFA International Energy and
Nuclear Energy Policy Office Director Thomas Meister replaced
Elbling as Chair. Meister gave a short presentation on the
status of CWD progress. Russian Delegate Antonov announced
that the process of donor countries funding CWD projects
through G-8 members, known as piggybacking, is not working.
He claimed the UK, Canada, and others are lagging far behind
in the work on their projects, and cited the need to finish
the current projects by the end of 2009. He also reiterated
an announcement made at the November 2006 meeting that Russia
plans to allocate four billion dollars, in addition to the
two billion already on record, to complete the CWD goals by
¶2012.
¶8. (SBU) The EU Commission, Italy, the UK, and Canada, and
others disputed Antonov's claims. Canadian Delegate Troy
Lulashnyk stated piggybacking is working and that Canada and
all other participants are completely committed to resolving
the current project delays. DAS Semmel noted some delays
have resulted from disagreements over estimates and took
satisfactory note of Russia's additional four billion dollar
commitment to the GP process. Antonov suggested members flag
the issue of discrepancies between Russia's figures and those
of other member states.
¶9. (SBU) Turning to RTGs, Meister noted the need for improved
cooperation on their removal. The Russian delegation gave a
status report on RTG removals and referred to a master plan
scheduled for completion March 8 that will be a guide for
funding the removals. The Russians calculated that, of the
581 remaining RTGs, about 35 will be removed annually until
all are gone. The UK delegates informed the group that the
UK has a good relationship with Rosatom, the Russian Ministry
for Atomic Energy Agency. The Canadian delegates announced
that, with U.S. cooperation, the removal of 16 RTGs will be
completed in Russia's Northern areas in 2007.
¶10. (SBU) The discussion of Russian nuclear submarine
dismantlement took place without incident. All delegates
delivered positive statements about the status of their
respective dismantlement efforts. The Canadian delegates
spoke of their plan to work with other members to dismantle
two Russian nuclear submarines per year "until there are none
left," and announced they are shifting their efforts to the
Far East. (Note: Submarine dismantlement in the Russian Far
East lags behind that in the Northern Baltic area. End
Note.) DAS Semmel drew attention to recent reports that
scrap metal from the submarines is generating funds that help
offset the costs of dismantlement.
¶11. (SBU) Canadian Delegate Ann Pollack announced a new
biosecurity project was under way at a human and animal
research facility in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, and informed
members that both the International Science and Technology
Center in Russia and the Science and Technology Center in
Ukraine are also working on five-year reviews. She said
Canada is considering sending a science center representative
to the NGO session in February. DAS Semmel added that, as
the evolution of the science centers is being considered,
they are, in some ways, going through an assessment similar
to that of the GP. Their future must also reflect the new
global realities in which the Russian economy has improved
since 2001 and can pay for the work of nuclear scientists
without so much outside support. Russian Delegate Valery
Biryukov informed the group Russia enjoys good cooperation
with the UK on working with former weapons scientists.
Biryukov expressed satisfaction with the current "Nuclear
Cities" project and announced that Rosatom is ready to sign a
new agreement.
¶12. (SBU) Meister closed with an announcement that all
members will soon receive information on the procedures for
the next steps in the review process and options to be
considered for presenting the review at the G-8 Summit. One
option is to replace the GP annual report with the review.
The other is to cite the review in the report and disseminate
the report as a stand-alone document.
¶13. (SBU) Canada followed with an announcement it will host a
reception at its Embassy the evening of February after the
NGO presentations. At that event, the Canadian Delegation
will present materials to show the positive results of GP
cooperation over the past five years.
¶14. (SBU) Comment: The GPWG partners are looking for ways to
bring some G-8 Summit attention to GP's successes to date, to
use the process to underscore the need to expand GP
priorities, and to re-energize the GP as a tool for reducing
the global threat of WMD. Over lunch, the Germans confirmed
our view that Russia,s primary, perhaps only, concern is
that the results of the review process might cause members to
stray away from CWD and submarine dismantlement commitments
toward new "priorities." The NGO session on February 27 will
be an important event in the GP process this year. It
appears our German hosts are carefully structuring the NGO
presentations in order to stimulate the review process and
perhaps defuse or reduce political differences among the
members over what the review should say. End Comment.
¶15. (U) Heads of Delegations:
--Viktor Elbling, Germany
--Anatoly Antonov, Russian Federation
--Camille Grand, France
--Antonio Catalano di Mellili, Italy
--Atsushi Kato, Japan
--Berenice Gare, United Kingdom
--Andrew Semmel, United States
--Troy Lulashnyk, Canada
--Lars-Erik Lundin, European Commission
--Tomas Reyes Ortega, EU Council
¶16. (U) DAS Semmel has cleared this cable.
TIMKEN JR