

Currently released so far... 12646 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AF
AU
ASEC
AMGT
AS
APER
AR
AEMR
AG
ARF
AJ
AA
AINF
APECO
AODE
ABLD
AMG
ATPDEA
AE
AMED
AGAO
AFIN
AL
ASUP
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
ASCH
AM
AORL
ASEAN
APEC
ADM
AFSI
AFSN
ADCO
ABUD
AN
AY
AIT
ACOA
ASIG
AADP
AGR
ANET
ADPM
AMCHAMS
ATRN
ALOW
ACS
APCS
AFFAIRS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
ACABQ
AGMT
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AFU
BR
BTIO
BY
BO
BA
BU
BL
BN
BM
BF
BEXP
BK
BG
BB
BTIU
BBSR
BRUSSELS
BD
BIDEN
BE
BH
BILAT
BC
BT
BP
BX
BMGT
BWC
CS
CA
CH
CD
CO
CE
CU
CVIS
CASC
CJAN
CI
CPAS
CMGT
CDG
CIC
CAC
CBW
CWC
COUNTER
CW
CT
CR
CY
CNARC
CACM
CG
CB
CM
CV
CIDA
CLINTON
CHR
COE
CIS
CDC
CONS
CF
CFED
CODEL
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CARSON
COPUOS
CIA
CL
CN
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CARICOM
CSW
CITT
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
EAID
ECON
EFIS
ETRD
EC
ENRG
EINV
EFIN
EAGR
ETTC
ECPS
EINT
EPET
ES
EIND
EAIR
EU
EUN
EG
ELAB
EWWT
EMIN
ECIN
ESA
ER
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EAIG
ET
ETRO
ELTN
EI
EN
EUR
EK
EUMEM
ENIV
EPA
ENGR
EXTERNAL
EUREM
ELN
EUC
ENERG
EZ
ERD
EFTA
ETRC
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ENVR
ESENV
ENNP
ERNG
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
EFINECONCS
EXIM
ELECTIONS
ECA
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
IC
IV
IAEA
IR
IT
IO
IN
IS
IZ
IMO
IPR
IWC
ICAO
ILO
ID
ICTY
ICJ
INMARSAT
INDO
IL
IMF
IRS
IQ
IA
ICRC
IDA
IAHRC
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
IDP
IGAD
ILC
ITRA
ICTR
ITU
IBET
ITF
INRA
INRO
INTELSAT
IEFIN
IRC
IRAQI
ITALY
ISRAELI
IIP
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
INTERPOL
IEA
INRB
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
KBTR
KPAO
KOMC
KCRM
KDEM
KHIV
KBIO
KTIA
KMDR
KNNP
KSCA
KTIP
KWMN
KIPR
KCOR
KRVC
KFRD
KPAL
KWBG
KE
KTDB
KUNR
KSPR
KJUS
KGHG
KAWC
KCFE
KGCC
KOLY
KSUM
KACT
KISL
KTFN
KFLU
KSTH
KMPI
KHDP
KS
KHLS
KSEP
KMRS
KID
KN
KU
KAWK
KSAC
KCOM
KAID
KIRC
KWMNCS
KMCA
KNEI
KCRS
KPKO
KICC
KIRF
KPOA
KV
KDRG
KSEO
KVPR
KTER
KBCT
KFIN
KGIC
KCIP
KZ
KG
KWAC
KRAD
KPRP
KTEX
KNAR
KPLS
KPAK
KSTC
KFLO
KSCI
KIDE
KO
KOMS
KHSA
KSAF
KPWR
KVRP
KENV
KNSD
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCGC
KVIR
KFSC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KWMM
KX
KMFO
KR
KMOC
KRIM
KCRCM
KBTS
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KTRD
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KRCM
KCFC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KLIG
KDEMAF
KPAI
KICA
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KMIG
KRGY
KIFR
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MX
MNUC
MCAP
MO
MR
MEPP
MTCRE
MAPP
MEPN
MZ
MT
ML
MA
MY
MIL
MD
MASSMNUC
MU
MK
MTCR
MUCN
MAS
MEDIA
MAR
MC
MI
MQADHAFI
MPOS
MARAD
MG
MTRE
MASC
MW
MRCRE
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
NATO
NZ
NL
NO
NK
NU
NPT
NI
NG
NEW
NSF
NA
NPG
NSG
NE
NSSP
NS
NDP
NSC
NAFTA
NH
NV
NP
NPA
NSFO
NT
NW
NASA
NORAD
NGO
NR
NATIONAL
NIPP
NZUS
NC
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
OEXC
OTRA
OPRC
OVIP
OAS
OECD
OIIP
OSCE
OREP
OPIC
OFDP
OMIG
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OIC
OIE
OPDC
ON
OCII
OPAD
OBSP
OFFICIALS
OPCW
OHUM
OES
OCS
OTR
OSAC
OFDA
PGOV
PREL
PM
PHUM
PTER
PINR
PINS
PREF
PARM
PL
PK
PU
PBTS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PO
PROP
PA
PNAT
POL
PLN
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PCUL
PAK
PGGV
PAO
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PAS
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PDOV
PHUMPGOV
PCI
PTBS
PEL
PG
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
POGOV
POV
PRAM
PP
PREO
PAHO
PBT
PREFA
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PMIL
PALESTINIAN
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PINF
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PGOC
PY
PHUH
PF
PRL
PHUS
RU
RS
RO
RW
RP
RFE
REGION
REACTION
REPORT
RCMP
RM
RSO
ROBERT
RICE
RSP
RF
ROOD
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SNAR
SL
SW
SMIG
SP
SY
SA
SHUM
SZ
SYRIA
SF
SR
SO
SPCE
SARS
SN
SC
SIPRS
SI
SYR
SEVN
SNARCS
SH
SAARC
STEINBERG
SG
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SWE
SHI
SEN
TW
TU
TBIO
TSPL
TPHY
TRGY
TC
TT
TSPA
TINT
TERRORISM
TX
TR
TS
TN
TD
TH
TIP
TNGD
TI
TZ
TF
THPY
TP
TBID
TL
TV
TK
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TFIN
TAGS
UN
UK
UNSC
UNGA
US
UNESCO
UP
UNHRC
UNAUS
USTR
UNDP
UNEP
UNMIK
UY
UNCHR
UNO
UG
UZ
UNPUOS
USEU
UNDC
UNICEF
UV
UNHCR
UNCND
UNCHC
UNCSD
USUN
USOAS
UNFCYP
USNC
UNIDROIT
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08USNATO251, JULY EAPC: OSCE BRIEF, UNSCR 1325, DEFENSE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08USNATO251.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08USNATO251 | 2008-07-17 10:03 | 2011-04-24 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Mission USNATO |
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHNO #0251/01 1991003
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 171003Z JUL 08
FM USMISSION USNATO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2078
INFO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KYIV IMMEDIATE 0132
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 6010
RUEHVJ/AMEMBASSY SARAJEVO IMMEDIATE 0144
RUEHSQ/AMEMBASSY SKOPJE IMMEDIATE 3399
RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI IMMEDIATE 5625
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEHNO/USDELMC BRUSSELS BE IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/USNMR SHAPE BE IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L USNATO 000251
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/09/2018
TAGS: PREL MARR NATO AORC AM AJ RU GG SW FI AF
SUBJECT: JULY EAPC: OSCE BRIEF, UNSCR 1325, DEFENSE
EDUCATION AND TRAINING
Classified By: Charge d'Affaires Richard G. Olson, Jr.
for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (C) Summary: During their July 9 meeting, EuroAtlantic
Partnership Council (EAPC) Ambassadors exchanged views with
OSCE Secretary General Marc Perrin de Brichambaut, covering
issues such as Afghanistan, Kosovo, and Georgia. The EAPC
also received a briefing on defense education and training
from Partnership for Peace Consortium Chairman Henri Bigo and
discussed next steps in implementing UNSCR 1325 on women,
peace and security. In a separate meeting with the Charge, de
Brichambaut said the Russians had specifically asked him to
pass on their offer to support the U.S. desire for increased
OSCE cooperation on Afghanistan, in exchange for unspecified
concessions in other areas. End summary.
OSCE Secretary General's Presentation
-------------------------------------
¶2. (C) OSCE SYG Marc Perrin de Brichambaut told the EAPC that
NATO and the OSCE have a shared interest in promoting
stability. He said the last 12 months have tested the
commitment of nations to the OSCE principles at the most
basic level. After highlighting the challenges facing the
OSCE in election monitoring and assisting with the unresolved
conflicts in Georgia, de Brichambaut shared his fear that the
"deeply rooted impasse" in Kosovo may have entered a long
period of ambiguity. De Brichambaut expressed his belief that
international action is vital to protect human rights and
fundamental freedoms in the Balkans. He also observed that
OSCE action in Afghanistan and Central Asia was a part of the
long term effort to consolidate security and democracy in
these areas. De Brichambaut said OSCE effectiveness in
Afghanistan will depend on the support of international
organizations, other key countries, and Russia. De
Brichambaut said the impasse over Russian suspension of the
Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty concerns the entire OCSE
community due to the importance of military transparency.
Finally de Brichambaut asserted that the OSCE itself can only
be effective insofar as the member states use it as a
toolbox. He argued that political-military considerations
cannot exist independently from economic and human-dimension
concerns. In conclusion he said he looked forward to closer
work with NATO, including through staff-to-staff
consultations.
¶3. (C) In response, Finland said that enhancing OSCE-NATO
cooperation is a priority for its chairmanship of the OSCE.
Austria, Spain, Germany and France asked what the OSCE could
do to enhance its role in Afghanistan, with Spain and Germany
specifically mentioning elections as an area to focus on.
Spain, Greece, and Hungary asked about OSCE activity in
Kosovo, while the Serbian representative took this
opportunity to express his thanks for a statement in 2007 by
de Brichambaut that Kosovo could become a precedent. Serbia
also expressed "profound gratitude" to the countries present
that had not recognized Kosovo. Russia said the OSCE should
play an adequate role in international security, and hoped
nations could work together to creatively solve the CFE
impasse.
¶4. (C) Georgia expressed gratitude to the OSCE SYG, saying
the OSCE had been helpful in the separatist conflicts. The
Czech Republic supported this view and called for more OSCE,
EU, and UN attention in the South Caucasus. Russia expressed
concern about escalating tensions in Georgia adding that
Moscow could not agree with the suggestion that peacekeeping
formats for the separatist conflicts be changed.
¶5. (C) Armenia spoke of the OSCE as a key asset for conflict
resolution, prompting Azerbaijan to assert its commitment to
democracy, human, rights and the rule of law. Azerbaijan and
Armenia traded well-known positions on the situation in
Nagorno Karabakh, causing other delegations to roll their
eyes at the proceedings.
¶6. (C) U.S. Charge Olson deployed guidance praising the work
of OSCE in promoting human rights and democratic elections in
Europe and Eurasia. Olson highlighted the work of ODIHR,
which, he said, is at the forefront of promoting, protecting
and defending shared values that are critical to democracy
and democratic development. He called on the OSCE to play a
proactive and creative role in working on the frozen
conflicts. The U.S. also strongly supported the OSCE's
engagement in Afghanistan, asserting that activities must
take place inside of Afghanistan to have any real impact.
OSCE Secretary General's Bilat with the U.S. Charge
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶7. (C) In a separate meeting with Charge Olson, de
Brichambaut suggested that the Russians were not yet in
support of the OSCE proposals for Afghanistan. He said the
Russians had directly asked him why "the U.S. does not ask us
directly to support their proposal" and that they had added
that if the U.S. were to do so "we will see what we might ask
of them." He said Russia had asked him to relay that message
directly to the U.S. He did not know what specifically they
might be seeking from the U.S., but was clear that the
Russians see the U.S. as the demandeur on this program.
¶8. (C) Charge Olson replied that the U.S. tries to avoid
linked deals of the sort the Russians seem to be seeking.
While the Russians repeatedly try to initiate negotiations of
this kind, the U.S. usually resists their efforts to make a
grand bargain and prefers to stick to the specifics of an
issue. The SYG noted that the Russians should ideally
realize that secure borders for Afghanistan were in Russia's
interest too. The SYG's Chief of Staff Paul Fritch remarked
that involvement of the CSTO was the most obvious demand the
Russians would seek. The Charge responded that such a request
would likely be a bridge too far in a NATO context.
¶9. (C) Olson stressed the importance of the OSCE program
operating inside Afghanistan. De Brichambaut replied that he
would have to take things one step at a time -- once the
program is approved the OSCE can look at other options, such
as increasing the presence inside Afghanistan and training
the Afghan customs force. Reacting to the comments of
several nations in the EAPC meeting that the OSCE should play
a role in assisting with the set up of the Afghan elections,
the SYG said he would discuss the possibility with the head
of ODHIR and thought it would be politically and financially
feasible.
¶10. (C) The SYG said he has been telling the Russians that,
if they were serious about Medvedev's proposal for a European
Security Treaty, they would need to define it more and decide
in which venue it will be discussed. The SYG said he had
discussed with Russian Deputy FM Grushko the possibility of
using OSCE Vienna as the venue. Grushko had told him Russia
felt it could not wait until the next U.S. administration to
begin talks on this issue.
¶11. (C) The SYG asked about the July 18 Friends of Kosovo
meeting in Brussels, saying he had been hearing from many
participants that they are not expecting much to come out of
it. Olson explained the background to the meeting, stressing
that an OSCE and UN presence were important as a way to give
cover to the Turks to allow the EU and NATO to have a meeting
together. The SYG said he would have to protect the Finnish
Presidency from Russian anger about the OSCE participating,
but still thought the OSCE would be able to attend.
Defense Education and Training - Resources Needed
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶12. (C) During the EAPC Ambassadorial, Mr. Henry Bigo,
Executive Director of the PfP Consortium of Defense Academies
and Security Studies Institute, briefed on EAPC/PfP education
and training goals, programs, and activities. Bigo also
encouraged the EAPC to take a good look at the published Food
for Thought paper (e-mailed to EUR-RPM), which provides the
"way-ahead" for the PfP Consortium. He reminded Ambassadors
that the Consortium relies on a small budget (less than USD
1M per year) and could benefit from additional assistance.
¶13. (C) Bigo requested three areas of assistance from the
EAPC: (I) A broader base of contributor nations to the
Consortium; (II) Direct-funding by Partner nations to their
defense colleges, institutions, and faculty to serve PfP
Consortium projects, education, and training. (III)
Voluntary contributions of national staff for the Consortium.
(Bigo did not request a specific number, but noted that they
currently rely on 3 full-time staff members).
¶14. (C) The Secretary General - assisted by Canada - provided
additional background on the Canadian-led PAP-DIB (Defense
Institution Building) Reference Curriculum that aims to
provide NATO partner and emerging partner nations with
in-depth learning objectives and curriculum support on
building and reforming defense institutions. The Curriculum
centers on three themes: public administration and
governance, defense management and economics, and ethics and
leadership.
¶15. (C) EAPC Partners were quick to support the initiatives
and activities of the PfP Consortium. The U.S. noted support
for the program, encouraged specificity of programming to
Partnership requirements, and requested that activities be
linked to an EAPC Work Plan, IPAP, or PfP PARP criteria.
This theme of "tailoring activities towards Partners'
requirements" was echoed by other nations including
Switzerland, Romania, Georgia, and Azerbaijan. Mr. Bigo
later indicated that it is the Consortium's intent to tailor
activities to Partner nations' needs and requirements.
¶16. (C) The SECGEN concluded the discussion by appealing to
EAPC nations to review their contributions and assistance,
noting that, "high quality education and training cannot be
made available on the cheap."
UNSCR 1325 - Guidelines and a Policy to be Developed
Sweden to lead a PRT Study in Afghanistan
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶17. (C) The SYG announced that Allies had decided to adopt
the following approach in developing NATO,s commitment to
the principles of UNSCR 1325:
(I) The International Military Staff (IMS) will task Allied
Command Operations and Allied Command Transformation with
developing "bi-strategic guidelines" that will provide
pragmatic guidance to commanders and their troops.
(II) The NATO International Staff (IS) and the IMS will work
together to develop a policy paper, drawing on national and
international organizational experience.
(III) An ad-hoc working group of Allies (membership to be
determined) will meet to consider the policy, and will then
consult with partners.
(IV) The final paper would be returned to the North Atlantic
Council for endorsement.
¶18. (C) Allies and Partners welcomed this approach but many
also expressed frustration that it had taken so long to reach
this point. Austria, Canada, Sweden, Denmark, Finland,
Norway, Switzerland, Montenegro, Spain, France and Germany
all spoke of their national support for UNSCR 1325 and looked
forward to progress. France suggested EU work on the issue
could inspire a coherent approach. Swedish Ambassador
Veronika Wand Danielsson announced that Denmark, Finland, the
Netherlands, Norway and Sweden will conduct a joint study on
improving the effectiveness of PRTs in Afghanistan in
applying UNSCR 1325. The study is to be completed by Spring
¶2009. Wand Danielsson hoped that all Allies and Partners
would support this work, including by accepting researchers
into their PRTs (Note: In a follow up conversation with the
Swedish Mission to NATO, PolOff learned that planning for
this effort is at the earliest stages. The group plans to
meet in Stockholm in September to launch the project
proposal, as well as to plan the study trips. Sweden's
minutes of the group's initial meeting have been forwarded to
EUR/RPM. This development will undoubtedly lead to requests
for U.S. assistance. End note.)
OLSON