

Currently released so far... 12453 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AORC
AMGT
APER
AU
AF
AS
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
AFIN
AR
AE
AJ
ADANA
AEMR
AG
ATRN
ADPM
APECO
AGAO
AMED
AX
AM
AL
ADCO
AA
AECL
AADP
ABUD
AMEX
ACAO
ANET
AODE
ASCH
AY
APEC
AID
AORG
ASEAN
AFSI
AFSN
AINF
AGR
AROC
AO
AMBASSADOR
AFFAIRS
ASIG
ABLD
ASUP
AND
ARM
ARF
AQ
ATFN
AC
ACOA
AORL
ADM
AUC
AGMT
ACABQ
ASEX
AFU
ALOW
AZ
APCS
AVERY
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AER
AN
AIT
AMG
AGRICULTURE
AMCHAMS
ACS
BR
BA
BD
BL
BO
BF
BU
BILAT
BEXP
BRUSSELS
BK
BN
BM
BT
BY
BX
BTIO
BIDEN
BG
BE
BP
BBSR
BC
BTIU
BWC
BB
BH
BMGT
CH
CY
CA
CU
CS
CO
CVIS
CPAS
CMGT
CE
COUNTER
CASC
COUNTRY
CJAN
COUNTERTERRORISM
CG
CI
CD
CIDA
CJUS
CDG
CBSA
CEUDA
CR
CM
CLMT
CAC
CBW
CODEL
COPUOS
CWC
CIC
CW
CBE
CHR
CFED
CT
CONS
CIA
CTM
CDC
CVR
CF
CLINTON
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CACS
CAN
CONDOLEEZZA
CB
CSW
CITT
CARSON
CNARC
CACM
CDB
CARICOM
COM
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CV
CKGR
CBC
CL
CICTE
CIS
ECON
EFIN
ELAB
ETRD
EIND
EC
EINV
EAGR
ENRG
ETTC
EAID
EPET
ELTN
EWWT
EAIR
EFIS
EMIN
EG
EU
ER
EUN
EPA
ENVI
EXTERNAL
ECPS
ENGR
ETRC
ECIN
EN
EI
ELN
ET
EINT
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ES
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EZ
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EFTA
EAIG
EK
EUREM
EURN
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EAP
ENIV
ECONOMY
ESA
EINN
ECONOMIC
EIAR
EXBS
ECA
ECUN
EINDETRD
EUR
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
ENERG
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFIM
ENGY
EAIDS
EINVEFIN
EINVETC
EUMEM
ETRA
ETC
ERNG
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EXIM
ERD
EEPET
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IO
IAHRC
ID
IC
IT
IRAQI
IWC
IN
IL
ISLAMISTS
IV
ICAO
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IPR
ICRC
INTERPOL
IQ
IBET
IMO
INR
ITRA
INTERNAL
ICJ
ICTY
IRS
ILO
INRA
INRO
ISRAELI
IEA
INRB
ITALY
ITU
IBRD
IIP
ILC
INTELSAT
IZPREL
IMF
INMARSAT
IRAJ
IDA
ICTR
IA
IGAD
IF
IDP
ITF
ISRAEL
IEFIN
IRC
IACI
KN
KCRM
KOMC
KNNPMNUC
KIPR
KPAL
KWBG
KSCA
KFRD
KNNP
KUNR
KTIP
KWMN
KSTC
KFLU
KOLY
KISL
KPAO
KMDR
KJUS
KSTH
KDEM
KCOR
KIRF
KAWC
KU
KTFN
KWAC
KNPP
KERG
KSEO
KACT
KHLS
KZ
KGHG
KTIA
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KE
KPKO
KCIP
KDRG
KVPR
KV
KIDE
KICC
KPRP
KBIO
KSUM
KGIT
KCFE
KG
KBTS
KFLO
KMPI
KS
KGIC
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KSEP
KTEX
KFSC
KOCI
KHDP
KPLS
KTDB
KHIV
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KMRS
KOM
KSAF
KRVC
KR
KMOC
KNAR
KIRC
KBCT
KSPR
KFIN
KBTR
KJUST
KNEI
KAWK
KGCC
KMCA
KREL
KMFO
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVRP
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KAID
KVIR
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KRAD
KPRV
KCMR
KPWR
KCHG
KIFR
KCFC
KICA
KPIN
KSCI
KESS
KDEV
KTBT
KCRS
KCGC
KOMS
KRIM
KTER
KREC
KPOA
KWWMN
KRGY
KPAK
KWNM
KMIG
KDDG
KRFD
KWMM
KWMNCS
KX
KRCM
KPAONZ
KNUC
KDEMAF
KNUP
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MCAP
MTCRE
MNUC
MIL
MX
MEDIA
MO
MPOS
MU
ML
MA
MP
MY
MERCOSUR
MG
MD
MW
MK
MAS
MEETINGS
MR
MT
MI
MOPPS
MASC
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MTRE
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
MARAD
MASSMNUC
MEPP
MCC
MZ
MILITARY
MDC
MRCRE
MC
MV
MIK
MUCN
NATO
NL
NZ
NPT
NI
NAFTA
NU
NDP
NIPP
NP
NPA
NG
NRR
NO
NSC
NEW
NE
NH
NR
NA
NS
NSF
NZUS
NATIONAL
NSG
NC
NT
NAR
NK
NGO
NV
NSFO
NSSP
NASA
NW
NPG
NORAD
NATOPREL
OTRA
OAS
OPRC
OIIP
OVIP
OREP
OPDC
OEXC
OSCE
OFFICIALS
OMIG
ODIP
OFDP
OECD
OPIC
OBSP
OPCW
OFDA
OTR
OSAC
OSCI
ON
OCII
OES
OVP
OIC
OPAD
OIE
OHUM
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PK
PHUM
PINS
PARM
PA
PTER
PINR
PREF
PHSA
PBTS
PBIO
PO
POL
PE
PARMS
PM
PROG
PL
PAK
POLITICS
PORG
PTBS
PNAT
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PROP
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PAO
PG
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PALESTINIAN
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PSEPC
PREFA
PGOVE
PINF
PHUMPGOV
PNG
PMIL
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
PLN
PSA
PGIV
POLINT
PAS
POGOV
PHUMPREL
PHUMBA
PEL
PGGV
PNR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PRAM
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PF
POV
PROV
PRL
PREO
PAHO
PHUH
PSI
PINL
PU
PRGOV
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
RS
RU
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RO
RW
RCMP
RF
RM
RFE
RSP
RP
RICE
ROBERT
ROOD
RELATIONS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RSO
SU
SNAR
SO
SOCI
SW
SENV
SMIG
SCUL
SP
SZ
SENVKGHG
SR
SY
SA
SYRIA
SF
SI
SC
SWE
SARS
STEINBERG
SN
SG
SIPRS
ST
SEVN
SL
SPCE
SNARIZ
SSA
SNARCS
SYR
SK
SPCVIS
SHUM
SIPDIS
SHI
SH
SOFA
SEN
SNARN
SAARC
SAN
SANC
SCRS
TRGY
TBIO
TU
TF
TERRORISM
TI
TSPL
TPHY
TH
TIP
TSPA
TC
TO
TW
TX
TZ
TNGD
TT
TL
TV
TFIN
TS
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TD
TK
TR
THPY
TP
TAGS
UNGA
UN
UK
US
UNC
UNSC
USUN
UG
UP
UY
USEU
UNESCO
USPS
USTR
UZ
UNHRC
UNO
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNHCR
UNCHR
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
USOAS
UNFICYP
UV
UNEP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDC
UNCHC
UNDP
UNCND
USNC
UNPUOS
UNICEF
UNCSD
UE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA875, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY CHERTOFF
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA875.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA875 | 2005-03-23 21:09 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000875
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR WHA/CAN, EB/TRA, AND CA/VO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECIN ASEC PREL CVIS CA PSEPC
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY CHERTOFF
MAINTAINS THE DIALOGUE WITH COUNTERPART DEPUTY PRIME
MINISTER MCLELLAN
REF: OTTAWA 774
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED--PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY.
¶1. (U) Summary: Handguns entering Canada illegally from the
United States and divergence between Canadian and U.S. visa
policies were two unscripted items discussed during
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michael
Chertoff's and Canadian Deputy Prime Minister (DPM) Anne
McLellan's first meeting on March 17. In general the
meetings discussed progress on implementation of the Smart
Border Action Plan, including critical infrastructure
protection, which is a priority for the Canadians. The
Secretary and DPM looked at progress toward remedying the
SIPDIS
congestion at Windsor-Detroit, the busiest border crossing.
The two leaders also discussed the Buffalo pre-clearance
project, which has so far been stalled primarily over the
issue of legal authorities. Finally, Chertoff and McLellan
participated in a joint press conference on the Top Officials
Three Exercise (TOPOFF 3). End summary.
¶2. (U) The March 17 meeting was the first occasion for
Secretary Chertoff to meet DPM McLellan since the Secretary
SIPDIS
assumed his position. Their meeting continued the tradition
of close cooperation and frequent consultation established by
McLellan's predecessor John Manley and Chertoff's predecessor
Tom Ridge. In December of 2001 Manley and Ridge had signed
the Smart Border Declaration which laid out a 30-point Action
Plan to identify and address security risks while at the same
time facilitating the legitimate flow of people and goods
across the border. Joint working groups comprised of U.S.
DHS agencies and their Canadian counterparts have met
regularly over the past three years to task recommended
actions and track implementation of the Action Plan.
¶3. (SBU) The DPM and Senior Assistant Deputy Minister of the
Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada
(PSEPC) Paul Kennedy explained to Secretary Chertoff the
long-standing partnership between the U.S. and Canada in
policing our shared border, a relationship embodied in the
Cross Border Crime Forum. Since the 9/11 attacks in the
U.S., Canada has sought to strengthen its national and
international security posture, spending over CAN $9 billion
on this effort. Canadian National Security Advisor Rob
Wright spoke about the history of the 1995 Shared Border
Accord and how the GOC is trying to do its part to implement
Smart Border activities, some of which (NEXUS and the Safe
Third Country Agreement) had been identified pre-9/11.
Canadian law enforcement agencies have long participated with
their U.S. counterparts in targeting possible cross-border
criminal and terrorist activities; this relationship has been
formalized under the Integrated Border Enforcement Team
(IBET) program. In addition to physical and infrastructure
enhancements to bolster security, Canada also undertook major
legislative initiatives, such as the Security Act of 2002,
which increases the ability of law enforcement agencies to
combat terrorism specifically. Paul Kennedy observed that
the revised Anti-Terror Act presently before Parliament is in
some ways complementary to the U.S. Patriot Act.
¶4. (SBU) PSEPC has particular responsibility for critical
infrastructure protection. PSEPC officials noted that 60
percent of Canadian infrastructure (e.g., gas pipelines,
electric power lines, tunnels, bridges, and railroads) has
some level of connectivity to the U.S. PSEPC suggested that
there is a need for common risk assessment standards, greater
sharing of information regarding threat levels, and more
joint exercises. PSEPC sees as immediate challenges the
removal of high risk threats and security on the Great Lakes
and St. Lawrence Seaway.
¶5. (SBU) PSEPC also raised the problem of cross-border
firearms smuggling, with DPM McLellan referring specifically
to smuggled pistols coming into Canada from the U.S. and
being used in drug-based gang violence in Toronto. (Comment:
Indeed, Canadian media reported the previous day on the
conviction of two gun smugglers, including one who brought 23
handguns into the country through the Windsor tunnel. End
comment.) Secretary Chertoff asked if Canada experiences the
same problem with handguns as the U.S.; the DPM replied that
it does not, because Canadian law does not recognize a right
to bear arms.
¶6. (SBU) The U.S. raised the issue of visas. Visa policy
coordination is one of the items on the Smart Border Action
Plan. (Comment: It is also one of the most touchy due to
sovereignty and privacy considerations. End comment.)
Secretary Chertoff asked about Canadian visa issuance
SIPDIS
procedures and if his understanding is correct that a mail-in
program was part of the process. The DPM and Rob Wright said
that wasn't true, that interviews were done. They added that
due to more stringent and demanding procedures, especially
for some former visa waiver countries, there is a large
backlog of visa applications. Wright said that when security
is the issue, there should be harmonization between the U.S.
and Canada. The U.S. asked about the wisdom of Canada not
requiring visas for South Koreans, particularly given reports
that South Korean women are smuggled through Canada into the
U.S. to work in the sex trade. The DPM acknowledged that
Canada had recently reconfirmed its position of not requiring
visas of South Koreans, but she said she would consult with
the Minister of Immigration on this U.S. question and
concern.
¶7. (SBU) When discussion turned to the Windsor-Detroit
Gateway and what seems to be a rather long lead time (until
2013) to actually implement any of the long-term solutions
currently on the table, DPM McLellan warned that the USG and
GOC should remain objective and not prejudge the five options
currently being considered. She added that the process is
underway (beginning with the announcement of contracts for
environmental impact assessments) and should be allowed to
move forward. The DPM and her staff suggested that President
Bush and Prime Minister Martin should continue to underscore
the importance for both nations of finding a solution to
easing congestion at the Windsor-Detroit corridor. Agencies
of both governments are currently implementing short-term
solutions to meet the 25 Percent Challenge (to reduce transit
times by 25 percent over 12 months) announced during the
December 2004 Ridge-McLellan meetings.
¶8. (SBU) The U.S. and Canada have identified the
Buffalo-Fort Erie crossing as the potential site for a pilot
land pre-clearance project. This pilot presents a different
sort of challenge than that at Windsor-Detroit, however, in
that it envisions national enforcement officers operating on
foreign territory: Canadian CBSA on the U.S. side, and U.S.
CBP in Canada. There are many vexing questions concerning
this arrangement, including the extent of authorities
(search, detain, arrest), immunities, and foremost perhaps,
the carrying of firearms. Other problems include the
question of whether or not a person intending to cross the
border would be allowed to withdraw once an inspection has
started. Secretary Chertoff acknowledged the difficulty
posed by the asymmetrical authorities currently exercised by
CBP and CBSA. Rob Wright said that mechanisms could be
agreed upon, such as targeting, that would allow the project
to work. DHS staff explained that a study of the Buffalo
pre-clearance pilot is underway. Operational analysis must
be done, with a view to identifying the greatest facilitation
and maximization of resources. A progress report is
anticipated in May. All agreed that a way can be found to
allow the pilot project to go forward.
¶9. (SBU) Looking at opportunities for future collaboration,
Rob Wright said that Canada's National Security Policy will
continue to bind the U.S. and Canadian security strategies
ever closer together. The Bush-Martin and Ridge-McLellan
meetings in December 2004 were important steps in creating
the environment to build stronger security ties. The March
23 "Trio" meeting in Texas would provide another opportunity.
Wright commented that domain awareness, the broadening of
shared procedures at the borders, and economic imperatives
should tie the countries together. Secretary Chertoff and
DPM McLellan will be in Texas for the roll out of the
Security and Prosperity Partnership.
¶10. (U) Secretary Chertoff and DPM McLellan (and the British
Home Secretary via pre-recorded video) held a press
conference announcing the TOPOFF 3 exercise April 4 - 8 that
will simulate a terrorist attack to test emergency plans and
procedures. The U.S., Canada, and the United Kingdom are the
principal participants with 13 other countries, including
Mexico, as observers. In their press statements the
Secretary and DPM emphasized the U.S.-Canadian partnership to
SIPDIS
thwart terrorism while at the same time facilitating the free
flow of legitimate commerce and people.
¶11. (U) Comment: This was a successful first meeting
between Secretary Chertoff and DPM McLellan, which will help
them move through a full bilateral agenda. There remain,
however, many legal (enforcement authorities, privacy issues)
and political (sovereignty) hurdles to be overcome in
achieving optimal cooperation on border security.
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
DICKSON