

Currently released so far... 12453 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AORC
AMGT
APER
AU
AF
AS
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
AFIN
AR
AE
AJ
ADANA
AEMR
AG
ATRN
ADPM
APECO
AGAO
AMED
AX
AM
AL
ADCO
AA
AECL
AADP
ABUD
AMEX
ACAO
ANET
AODE
ASCH
AY
APEC
AID
AORG
ASEAN
AFSI
AFSN
AINF
AGR
AROC
AO
AMBASSADOR
AFFAIRS
ASIG
ABLD
ASUP
AND
ARM
ARF
AQ
ATFN
AC
ACOA
AORL
ADM
AUC
AGMT
ACABQ
ASEX
AFU
ALOW
AZ
APCS
AVERY
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AER
AN
AIT
AMG
AGRICULTURE
AMCHAMS
ACS
BR
BA
BD
BL
BO
BF
BU
BILAT
BEXP
BRUSSELS
BK
BN
BM
BT
BY
BX
BTIO
BIDEN
BG
BE
BP
BBSR
BC
BTIU
BWC
BB
BH
BMGT
CH
CY
CA
CU
CS
CO
CVIS
CPAS
CMGT
CE
COUNTER
CASC
COUNTRY
CJAN
COUNTERTERRORISM
CG
CI
CD
CIDA
CJUS
CDG
CBSA
CEUDA
CR
CM
CLMT
CAC
CBW
CODEL
COPUOS
CWC
CIC
CW
CBE
CHR
CFED
CT
CONS
CIA
CTM
CDC
CVR
CF
CLINTON
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CACS
CAN
CONDOLEEZZA
CB
CSW
CITT
CARSON
CNARC
CACM
CDB
CARICOM
COM
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CV
CKGR
CBC
CL
CICTE
CIS
ECON
EFIN
ELAB
ETRD
EIND
EC
EINV
EAGR
ENRG
ETTC
EAID
EPET
ELTN
EWWT
EAIR
EFIS
EMIN
EG
EU
ER
EUN
EPA
ENVI
EXTERNAL
ECPS
ENGR
ETRC
ECIN
EN
EI
ELN
ET
EINT
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ES
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EZ
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EFTA
EAIG
EK
EUREM
EURN
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EAP
ENIV
ECONOMY
ESA
EINN
ECONOMIC
EIAR
EXBS
ECA
ECUN
EINDETRD
EUR
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
ENERG
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFIM
ENGY
EAIDS
EINVEFIN
EINVETC
EUMEM
ETRA
ETC
ERNG
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EXIM
ERD
EEPET
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IO
IAHRC
ID
IC
IT
IRAQI
IWC
IN
IL
ISLAMISTS
IV
ICAO
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IPR
ICRC
INTERPOL
IQ
IBET
IMO
INR
ITRA
INTERNAL
ICJ
ICTY
IRS
ILO
INRA
INRO
ISRAELI
IEA
INRB
ITALY
ITU
IBRD
IIP
ILC
INTELSAT
IZPREL
IMF
INMARSAT
IRAJ
IDA
ICTR
IA
IGAD
IF
IDP
ITF
ISRAEL
IEFIN
IRC
IACI
KN
KCRM
KOMC
KNNPMNUC
KIPR
KPAL
KWBG
KSCA
KFRD
KNNP
KUNR
KTIP
KWMN
KSTC
KFLU
KOLY
KISL
KPAO
KMDR
KJUS
KSTH
KDEM
KCOR
KIRF
KAWC
KU
KTFN
KWAC
KNPP
KERG
KSEO
KACT
KHLS
KZ
KGHG
KTIA
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KE
KPKO
KCIP
KDRG
KVPR
KV
KIDE
KICC
KPRP
KBIO
KSUM
KGIT
KCFE
KG
KBTS
KFLO
KMPI
KS
KGIC
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KSEP
KTEX
KFSC
KOCI
KHDP
KPLS
KTDB
KHIV
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KMRS
KOM
KSAF
KRVC
KR
KMOC
KNAR
KIRC
KBCT
KSPR
KFIN
KBTR
KJUST
KNEI
KAWK
KGCC
KMCA
KREL
KMFO
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVRP
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KAID
KVIR
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KRAD
KPRV
KCMR
KPWR
KCHG
KIFR
KCFC
KICA
KPIN
KSCI
KESS
KDEV
KTBT
KCRS
KCGC
KOMS
KRIM
KTER
KREC
KPOA
KWWMN
KRGY
KPAK
KWNM
KMIG
KDDG
KRFD
KWMM
KWMNCS
KX
KRCM
KPAONZ
KNUC
KDEMAF
KNUP
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MCAP
MTCRE
MNUC
MIL
MX
MEDIA
MO
MPOS
MU
ML
MA
MP
MY
MERCOSUR
MG
MD
MW
MK
MAS
MEETINGS
MR
MT
MI
MOPPS
MASC
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MTRE
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
MARAD
MASSMNUC
MEPP
MCC
MZ
MILITARY
MDC
MRCRE
MC
MV
MIK
MUCN
NATO
NL
NZ
NPT
NI
NAFTA
NU
NDP
NIPP
NP
NPA
NG
NRR
NO
NSC
NEW
NE
NH
NR
NA
NS
NSF
NZUS
NATIONAL
NSG
NC
NT
NAR
NK
NGO
NV
NSFO
NSSP
NASA
NW
NPG
NORAD
NATOPREL
OTRA
OAS
OPRC
OIIP
OVIP
OREP
OPDC
OEXC
OSCE
OFFICIALS
OMIG
ODIP
OFDP
OECD
OPIC
OBSP
OPCW
OFDA
OTR
OSAC
OSCI
ON
OCII
OES
OVP
OIC
OPAD
OIE
OHUM
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PK
PHUM
PINS
PARM
PA
PTER
PINR
PREF
PHSA
PBTS
PBIO
PO
POL
PE
PARMS
PM
PROG
PL
PAK
POLITICS
PORG
PTBS
PNAT
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PROP
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PAO
PG
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PALESTINIAN
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PSEPC
PREFA
PGOVE
PINF
PHUMPGOV
PNG
PMIL
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
PLN
PSA
PGIV
POLINT
PAS
POGOV
PHUMPREL
PHUMBA
PEL
PGGV
PNR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PRAM
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PF
POV
PROV
PRL
PREO
PAHO
PHUH
PSI
PINL
PU
PRGOV
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
RS
RU
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RO
RW
RCMP
RF
RM
RFE
RSP
RP
RICE
ROBERT
ROOD
RELATIONS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RSO
SU
SNAR
SO
SOCI
SW
SENV
SMIG
SCUL
SP
SZ
SENVKGHG
SR
SY
SA
SYRIA
SF
SI
SC
SWE
SARS
STEINBERG
SN
SG
SIPRS
ST
SEVN
SL
SPCE
SNARIZ
SSA
SNARCS
SYR
SK
SPCVIS
SHUM
SIPDIS
SHI
SH
SOFA
SEN
SNARN
SAARC
SAN
SANC
SCRS
TRGY
TBIO
TU
TF
TERRORISM
TI
TSPL
TPHY
TH
TIP
TSPA
TC
TO
TW
TX
TZ
TNGD
TT
TL
TV
TFIN
TS
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TD
TK
TR
THPY
TP
TAGS
UNGA
UN
UK
US
UNC
UNSC
USUN
UG
UP
UY
USEU
UNESCO
USPS
USTR
UZ
UNHRC
UNO
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNHCR
UNCHR
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
USOAS
UNFICYP
UV
UNEP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDC
UNCHC
UNDP
UNCND
USNC
UNPUOS
UNICEF
UNCSD
UE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07STATE157671, U.S. RESPONSE TO EU DRAFT CODE OF CONDUCT FOR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07STATE157671.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07STATE157671 | 2007-11-17 01:01 | 2011-05-02 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Secretary of State |
VZCZCXRO8957
OO RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHC #7671/01 3210137
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O R 170126Z NOV 07
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON IMMEDIATE 4876
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON IMMEDIATE 3344
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS IMMEDIATE 5748
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA IMMEDIATE 9234
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS IMMEDIATE
INFO DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE COLLECTIVE
EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 2177
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 9606
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 STATE 157671
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CDG EC ESA EUN FR KACT KTIA MCAP PARM PO PREL TSPA
UK
SUBJECT: U.S. RESPONSE TO EU DRAFT CODE OF CONDUCT FOR
SPACE OBJECTS
REF: LISBON 002604
¶1. (U) This is an action message. See paragraphs 3 - 6.
¶2. (SBU) BACKGROUND: On October 9, the Portuguese MFA's
Security and Disarmament Division, in its role as chair of
the EU Working Group on Global Arms Control, provided Embassy
Lisbon with a non-paper on a proposed EU "Code of Conduct for
Space Objects" (REFTEL). Portugal requested a U.S. response
in support of an EU-only experts meeting, scheduled for
December 7. Portuguese officials indicated that they also
are soliciting comments from Russia and China.
¶3. (SBU) FOR LISBON: Embassy Lisbon is requested to hand
over the U.S. non-paper (contained in paragraph 5 below) to
the Portuguese Presidency of the EU. Embassy Lisbon is also
authorized to provide a line-in/line-out mark-up version of
original EU non-paper (to be transmitted via e-mail). Embassy
Lisbon should the request that the Portuguese Presidency of
the EU treat both the non-paper and line-in/line-out mark-up
as "Restreint UE." Embassy Lisbon also should indicate that
the U.S. welcomes further exchanges on this topic with
Portugal and future EU Presidencies.
¶4. (SBU) FOR LONDON AND PARIS: Embassies London and Paris are
requested to hand over the U.S. non-paper contained in
paragraph 7 to the UK FCO and the French MFA. Embassies
London and Paris are also authorized to provide HMG and GoF
with the line-in/line-out mark-up version of the original EU
non-paper (to be transmitted via e-mail). Embassies should
indicate that this is the U.S. response to the Portuguese
Presidency's request, and that the U.S. welcomes
opportunities for discussions on specific points at future
bilateral space security dialogue discussions.
¶5. (SBU) FOR USEU: Following handover to Portugal, USEU is
authorized to provide a courtesy copy of the non-paper and
line-in/line-out mark-up to the European Commission.
¶6. (SBU) FOR GENEVA: Following handover to Portugal, USDEL to
the Conference on Disarmament is authorized to provide
courtesy copies of the non-paper and line-in/line-out mark-up
to CD Delegations of EU Member States. Ambassador Rocca is
also authorized to share copies of the non-paper and mark-up
with non-EU members of the CD Western Group (WEOG).
¶7. (SBU) BEGIN TEXT OF U.S. NON-PAPER
United States Non-Paper
November 16, 2007
The United States is pleased to respond to the Portuguese
Presidency,s request of October 9, 2007, for comments on the
European Union's draft Code of Conduct for Space Objects.
The United States welcomes opportunities for substantive
discussions on outer space Transparency and Confidence
Building Measures (TCBMs) with all established and emerging
spacefaring nations.
Such discussions can build upon the shared values expressed
in both the U.S. National Space Policy of August 31, 2006,
and the European Space Policy of May 22, 2007. These values
include our shared and long-standing support for the
principle of free access to, and the use of, space by all
nations for peaceful purposes. They also include our common
interest in using outer space both to maintain international
peace and security and to promote international cooperation
and understanding.
The United States opposes efforts which would link
discussions on pragmatic TCBMs with efforts to negotiate
agreements for preventing the so-called "weaponization of
outer space" or efforts to establish new legal regimes or
other restrictions that seek to prohibit or limit access to,
or use of, outer space for peaceful purposes.
STATE 00157671 002 OF 003
The United States strongly supports efforts to preserve the
space environment and to ensure safe and responsible space
operations. In this regard, we believe that international
cooperation should focus upon voluntary guidelines for safe
space operations. Such guidelines can be applicable to all
peaceful uses of space. The United States believes these
"Best Practice Guidelines" should be developed first in
expert-level discussions involving relevant government and
private sector satellite operators. Where appropriate,
specific guidelines developed in these expert-level
discussions can be the subject of discussions with allies and
like-minded states, and may be submitted to the United
Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space
(COPUOS) for consideration by the broader community of
established and emerging spacefaring nations. Such efforts
can build upon this Committee,s recent successful work on
debris mitigation guidelines, an effort that was greatly
facilitated by the close collaboration between the United
States and European members of COPUOS.
Where appropriate, the United States also is willing to
engage in substantive discussions on proposals for new TCBMs.
The United States welcomes opportunities for expanded
trans-Atlantic dialogue with European experts on possible new
TCBMs. The U.S. also will continue to engage in discussions
with Russia and other spacefaring nations on complementary
bilateral TCBMs that can promote cooperation and reduce
uncertainty in the conduct of safe space operations.
In this regard, the United States views many of the ideas
contained in the European Union draft as constructive
contributions to international discussions on measures that
protect the space environment and protect free access to, and
use of, space for the benefit of all nations. We believe the
EU draft could form the basis for an international consensus
that reflects the shared views of the Euro-Atlantic community.
With an eye toward building such a consensus, the United
States offers the attached comments, which propose the
following changes:
- Throughout the draft, replace references to "Code of
Conduct" with the term "Best Practice Guidelines" to
emphasize the voluntary nature of the proposed measures.
- In the first ("Framework") section, modify wording to:
--Drop linkages between consideration of TCBMs and efforts to
prevent a so-called "weaponization" of outer space;
-- Focus on relevant areas of shared EU-U.S. agreement,
including the 1963 Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the
Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water, instruments of
the International Telecommunication Union, and public release
of comprehensive space policies; and
-- Drop references to measures which suggest that TCBMs must
be connected to space arms control agreements, including UN
General Assembly resolution 61/58.
- In the second section, adapt wording to reflect shared EU
and U.S. support for the "Basic Objectives" of:
-- Ensuring free access to, and use of, outer space by all
nations for peaceful purposes;
-- Preserving freedom of action in space while protecting
critical space capabilities;
-- Recognizing that space capabilities support vital security
and foreign policy interests; and
-- Conducting space activities in accordance with
international law, including the UN Charter.
- In the third section, create an "Operational" subsection
that would:
-- Propose measures for the sharing of space environment data
and for developing standardized data formats for information
exchange;
-- Propose measures that recognize existing and emerging best
practices for human spaceflight safety and collision
avoidance;
-- Replace the measure restricting "any manoeuvre or action"
with a proposed measure to provide notification of other
concerned satellite operators in the event of a spacecraft
malfunction;
-- Clarify language in proposed measures relating to the
intentional creation of debris and mitigation of possibility
STATE 00157671 003 OF 003
SUBJECT: U.S. RESPONSE TO EU DRAFT CODE OF CONDUCT FOR
SPACE OBJEC
of accidents, collision or other forms of harmful
interference;
-- Clarify language in the proposed measure for minimizing
the risk of harmful interference to other nations, space
activities;
-- Clarify language in measures for responding to, and
resolving, harmful interference incidents; and
-- Delete a proposed measure on "special caution areas," a
technically vague concept that could unduly restrict
fundamental rights of passage through, and operations in,
space without interference.
- Also in the third section, create a "Transparency"
subsection that:
-- Proposes a measure encouraging disclosure of basic details
on high-level space policies;
-- Clarifies language in proposed measures relating to space
activity notification and Registration Convention compliance;
-- Removes proposed measures on prior notification of
satellite approaches, which could unduly restrict
fundamental rights of passage through, and operations in,
space without interference;
-- Removes a proposed measure regarding "space weapons,"
which is a term that remains indefinable; and
-- Removes a proposed measure regarding "dual-use character,"
which is also an indefinable concept.
END TEXT OF U.S. NON-PAPER
¶8. (U) Any reporting on this subject should be flagged for
the Department (ISN/MDSP:Richard H. Buenneke) and Geneva (CD).
RICE