

Currently released so far... 12453 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AORC
AMGT
APER
AU
AF
AS
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
AFIN
AR
AE
AJ
ADANA
AEMR
AG
ATRN
ADPM
APECO
AGAO
AMED
AX
AM
AL
ADCO
AA
AECL
AADP
ABUD
AMEX
ACAO
ANET
AODE
ASCH
AY
APEC
AID
AORG
ASEAN
AFSI
AFSN
AINF
AGR
AROC
AO
AMBASSADOR
AFFAIRS
ASIG
ABLD
ASUP
AND
ARM
ARF
AQ
ATFN
AC
ACOA
AORL
ADM
AUC
AGMT
ACABQ
ASEX
AFU
ALOW
AZ
APCS
AVERY
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AER
AN
AIT
AMG
AGRICULTURE
AMCHAMS
ACS
BR
BA
BD
BL
BO
BF
BU
BILAT
BEXP
BRUSSELS
BK
BN
BM
BT
BY
BX
BTIO
BIDEN
BG
BE
BP
BBSR
BC
BTIU
BWC
BB
BH
BMGT
CH
CY
CA
CU
CS
CO
CVIS
CPAS
CMGT
CE
COUNTER
CASC
COUNTRY
CJAN
COUNTERTERRORISM
CG
CI
CD
CIDA
CJUS
CDG
CBSA
CEUDA
CR
CM
CLMT
CAC
CBW
CODEL
COPUOS
CWC
CIC
CW
CBE
CHR
CFED
CT
CONS
CIA
CTM
CDC
CVR
CF
CLINTON
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CACS
CAN
CONDOLEEZZA
CB
CSW
CITT
CARSON
CNARC
CACM
CDB
CARICOM
COM
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CV
CKGR
CBC
CL
CICTE
CIS
ECON
EFIN
ELAB
ETRD
EIND
EC
EINV
EAGR
ENRG
ETTC
EAID
EPET
ELTN
EWWT
EAIR
EFIS
EMIN
EG
EU
ER
EUN
EPA
ENVI
EXTERNAL
ECPS
ENGR
ETRC
ECIN
EN
EI
ELN
ET
EINT
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ES
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EZ
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EFTA
EAIG
EK
EUREM
EURN
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EAP
ENIV
ECONOMY
ESA
EINN
ECONOMIC
EIAR
EXBS
ECA
ECUN
EINDETRD
EUR
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
ENERG
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFIM
ENGY
EAIDS
EINVEFIN
EINVETC
EUMEM
ETRA
ETC
ERNG
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EXIM
ERD
EEPET
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IO
IAHRC
ID
IC
IT
IRAQI
IWC
IN
IL
ISLAMISTS
IV
ICAO
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IPR
ICRC
INTERPOL
IQ
IBET
IMO
INR
ITRA
INTERNAL
ICJ
ICTY
IRS
ILO
INRA
INRO
ISRAELI
IEA
INRB
ITALY
ITU
IBRD
IIP
ILC
INTELSAT
IZPREL
IMF
INMARSAT
IRAJ
IDA
ICTR
IA
IGAD
IF
IDP
ITF
ISRAEL
IEFIN
IRC
IACI
KN
KCRM
KOMC
KNNPMNUC
KIPR
KPAL
KWBG
KSCA
KFRD
KNNP
KUNR
KTIP
KWMN
KSTC
KFLU
KOLY
KISL
KPAO
KMDR
KJUS
KSTH
KDEM
KCOR
KIRF
KAWC
KU
KTFN
KWAC
KNPP
KERG
KSEO
KACT
KHLS
KZ
KGHG
KTIA
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KE
KPKO
KCIP
KDRG
KVPR
KV
KIDE
KICC
KPRP
KBIO
KSUM
KGIT
KCFE
KG
KBTS
KFLO
KMPI
KS
KGIC
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KSEP
KTEX
KFSC
KOCI
KHDP
KPLS
KTDB
KHIV
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KMRS
KOM
KSAF
KRVC
KR
KMOC
KNAR
KIRC
KBCT
KSPR
KFIN
KBTR
KJUST
KNEI
KAWK
KGCC
KMCA
KREL
KMFO
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVRP
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KAID
KVIR
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KRAD
KPRV
KCMR
KPWR
KCHG
KIFR
KCFC
KICA
KPIN
KSCI
KESS
KDEV
KTBT
KCRS
KCGC
KOMS
KRIM
KTER
KREC
KPOA
KWWMN
KRGY
KPAK
KWNM
KMIG
KDDG
KRFD
KWMM
KWMNCS
KX
KRCM
KPAONZ
KNUC
KDEMAF
KNUP
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MCAP
MTCRE
MNUC
MIL
MX
MEDIA
MO
MPOS
MU
ML
MA
MP
MY
MERCOSUR
MG
MD
MW
MK
MAS
MEETINGS
MR
MT
MI
MOPPS
MASC
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MTRE
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
MARAD
MASSMNUC
MEPP
MCC
MZ
MILITARY
MDC
MRCRE
MC
MV
MIK
MUCN
NATO
NL
NZ
NPT
NI
NAFTA
NU
NDP
NIPP
NP
NPA
NG
NRR
NO
NSC
NEW
NE
NH
NR
NA
NS
NSF
NZUS
NATIONAL
NSG
NC
NT
NAR
NK
NGO
NV
NSFO
NSSP
NASA
NW
NPG
NORAD
NATOPREL
OTRA
OAS
OPRC
OIIP
OVIP
OREP
OPDC
OEXC
OSCE
OFFICIALS
OMIG
ODIP
OFDP
OECD
OPIC
OBSP
OPCW
OFDA
OTR
OSAC
OSCI
ON
OCII
OES
OVP
OIC
OPAD
OIE
OHUM
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PK
PHUM
PINS
PARM
PA
PTER
PINR
PREF
PHSA
PBTS
PBIO
PO
POL
PE
PARMS
PM
PROG
PL
PAK
POLITICS
PORG
PTBS
PNAT
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PROP
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PAO
PG
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PALESTINIAN
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PSEPC
PREFA
PGOVE
PINF
PHUMPGOV
PNG
PMIL
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
PLN
PSA
PGIV
POLINT
PAS
POGOV
PHUMPREL
PHUMBA
PEL
PGGV
PNR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PRAM
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PF
POV
PROV
PRL
PREO
PAHO
PHUH
PSI
PINL
PU
PRGOV
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
RS
RU
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RO
RW
RCMP
RF
RM
RFE
RSP
RP
RICE
ROBERT
ROOD
RELATIONS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RSO
SU
SNAR
SO
SOCI
SW
SENV
SMIG
SCUL
SP
SZ
SENVKGHG
SR
SY
SA
SYRIA
SF
SI
SC
SWE
SARS
STEINBERG
SN
SG
SIPRS
ST
SEVN
SL
SPCE
SNARIZ
SSA
SNARCS
SYR
SK
SPCVIS
SHUM
SIPDIS
SHI
SH
SOFA
SEN
SNARN
SAARC
SAN
SANC
SCRS
TRGY
TBIO
TU
TF
TERRORISM
TI
TSPL
TPHY
TH
TIP
TSPA
TC
TO
TW
TX
TZ
TNGD
TT
TL
TV
TFIN
TS
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TD
TK
TR
THPY
TP
TAGS
UNGA
UN
UK
US
UNC
UNSC
USUN
UG
UP
UY
USEU
UNESCO
USPS
USTR
UZ
UNHRC
UNO
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNHCR
UNCHR
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
USOAS
UNFICYP
UV
UNEP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDC
UNCHC
UNDP
UNCND
USNC
UNPUOS
UNICEF
UNCSD
UE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SANJOSE859, COSTA RICA: PLENTIFUL WATER, POOR MANAGEMENT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SANJOSE859.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08SANJOSE859 | 2008-10-31 12:12 | 2011-03-21 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0859/01 3051250
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 311250Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0228
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000859
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA, WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC, EEB AND OES
PLEASE PASS TO EPA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ECON ETRD OVIP PGOV PINR PREL CS SENV
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA: PLENTIFUL WATER, POOR MANAGEMENT
¶1. (U) SUMMARY: A rain-rich climatic regime supplies Costa Rica
with more than enough water. However, the growing threat of
contamination and chronic underinvestment in infrastructure
threatens potable water resources, and undermines Costa Rica's
"clean and green" international image. Urban expansion in the San
Jose area and the rapid expansion of private real estate
developments along the Pacific Coast (in many cases associated with
AmCit investors) test the capacity of the overlapping government
agencies responsible for protecting, regulating, developing,
maintaining, and delivering water resources. The public sector
recognizes the need for legislative reform and public investment
while also engaging with the private sector to tap capital in order
to develop new water projects. Nonetheless, given other GOCR
priorities (such as domestic security) competing for legislative
attention, and the diminished political capital of the Arias
administration, systemic reform is unlikely before the next
elections in 2010. END SUMMARY.
-------------------------------
98 PERCENT RUNNING WATER . . .
-------------------------------
¶2. (U) According to the latest "State of the Nation" (SotN#13)
report, nearly all of Costa Rica's population -- 98 percent --
receives water from pipes and almost all Costa Rican households --
94 percent - have access to running water. The Costa Rican Water
and Sewage Institute (AyA), a national but autonomous public
utility, states that 82 percent of the population receives potable
water and that 16 percent receives untreated water classified by AyA
as unpotable.
------------------------------
BUT GROWING WATER DEMAND . . .
------------------------------
¶3. (U) Costa Rica's rapid urban development has overtaken
institutional capacity to develop and maintain the potable water
resource. Resort development along much of the Pacific Coast has
largely exhausted nearby existing fresh-water sources during the
December-May dry season, prompting calls for major investment in new
projects. The San Jose Greater Metropolitan Area obtains about 80
percent of its potable water from aquifers that are reported to have
reached their extraction capacity, likewise prompting calls for
major investment.
¶4. (U) Yet, Costa Rica's geography is such that even those areas of
Costa Rica with potable water deficits during a portion of the year
have clear potential to tap one of many sources: areas inland of
the Pacific coastal boom towns have underexploited aquifers; tourist
boom towns have obvious access to sea water; numerous rivers drain
into the Pacific and the Caribbean; and the mountains north and
south of the capital city of San Jose are laced with many streams.
Costa Rica's looming water shortage is thus not due to major
physical limitations.
------------------------------
. . . NO ONE CLEARLY IN CHARGE
------------------------------
¶5. (U) The water sector in Costa Rica suffers from a crisis in
governance. Several governmental entities share overlapping (and
sometimes conflicting) responsibility for water management. The
Water Department of the Ministry of Environment, Energy and
Telecommunications (MINAET) is arguably the logical custodian of
water resources, but it is currently an underfunded bureaucracy with
a confused mandate. The GOCR assigns responsibility for reviewing
water quality to the Ministry of Health. The National Irrigation
and Surface Water Service (SENARA) has responsibility for the
evaluation of groundwater resources and for the country's largest
agricultural water project. The National Forest Finance Fund
(FONAFIFO), a department within MINAE, manages the payment of
environmental services to preserve aquifer recharge areas. The
Public Services Regulation Authority (ARESEP) approves water usage
rates charged to individual users by the various system operators.
¶6. (U) Other institutions that regulate land use, and therefore
impact water management, include the National Parks service, the
Forestry Department of MINAE, the Ministry of Agriculture (MAG), the
Institute of Housing and Urban Development (INVU), and local
municipalities. Though these agencies have responsibility for
various aspects of water management, none/none of these agencies
actually deliver water to the user.
¶7. (U) On the operational side, AyA manages water systems serving 46
percent of the Costa Rican population and has nominal legal control
over the systems operated by 1,800+ independent community water
associations ("ASADAS") that serve another 25 percent of the
population. Municipalities manage another 18 percent, the regional
Heredia Public Utility Company (ESPH) has close to 5 percent, and
the remaining roughly 6 percent receive water on their own or are
not in the survey. (Data from SOTN#12, pg 233).
---------------------------------
. . . REVENUE COLLECTION PROBLEMS
---------------------------------
¶8. (U) The Arias Administration adopted water usage and discharge
fees by decree in 2006, yet, to date, only private holders of water
concessions have been paying the fee. Public institutions avoid
payment of the water usage fee, while the discharge fee was
re-defined and is slated to go into effect late this year. Jose
Miguel Zeledon, current director of the MINAET Water Department,
continues to be optimistic that the water usage fee will yield a
total of $10 million per year by 2013 when it is fully in effect,
with 43 percent generated by SENARA, 29 percent from hydroelectric
projects (mostly from the Costa Rican Electrical Institute (ICE)),
13 percent from water systems (AyA, ASADAS, and municipalities) and
the remainder from individual wells and agricultural use. The Water
Department will spend half those funds on the department itself, and
dedicate the other half to reforestation and conservation projects.
-----------------------
. . . AND CONTAMINATION
-----------------------
¶9. (U) Contamination of the water resource has become increasingly
evident in recent years, contradicting Costa Rica's international
reputation as a "clean and green" country. Fecal contamination is
universal in urban waterways; the Tarcoles River leading from the
Central Valley to the Central Pacific coast has been categorized as
"San Jose's Open Sewer." AyA's own statistics for 2007 show that
only 3.5 percent of Costa Rica's sewage is treated under operator
control, underscoring the extent of the problems:
Sewage Lines & Treatment Plant with Operator 3.5%
Latrines 3.5%
Sewage Lines & Treatment Plant w/o Operator 4.9%
Sewage Lines w/o Treatment Plant 20.1%
Septic Tanks 67.3%
AyA estimates that 50 percent of the septic tanks don't work. Thus,
AyA claims that 37 percent of the waste water in Costa Rica -- 3.5
percent plus 33.5 percent -- is treated.
¶10. (U) Aquifer contamination also threatens water quality. Not
only may river water and badly functioning septic tanks eventually
introduce fecal contaminants into the aquifers, but gasoline storage
tanks have already shown the potential for pollution. Agriculture
pollution is a recurrent danger given that Costa Rica's relatively
wealthy agricultural sector, geared for export production, makes
heavy use of agricultural chemicals. In the coastal zones, salt
water intrusion into the aquifers is an imminent threat as lax
management of the aquifers leads to excessive drawdown and exposure
to sea water contamination.
¶11. (U) Although the problem has been building for years, fecal
contamination of coastal waters has become a front-page issue. A
series of tests off of the Pacific coast tourist mecca of Tamarindo
Beach revealed high levels of contamination along the beachfront and
in the ocean. There is no public sewer system in Tamarindo and many
hotels ignore the requirement to treat their own water. Recently,
water tests at the Central Pacific resort town of Jaco revealed
fecal contamination exceeding 1100 parts per 100 milliliters of
water. (COMMENT: the recommended EPA threshold for swimming is 200
parts per 100 milliliters of water. END COMMENT.)
¶12. (U) Health officials finally responded by closing and citing
establishments in the Tamarindo area, while AyA officials continue
to test for pollutants along the coast. The five-star Hotel Resort
Allegro Papagayo was partially closed from February to mid-September
2008 after repeated water pollution violations. The port city of
Puntarenas, further to the south, dumps most of its sewage in the
estuary adjacent to the city, prompting AyA to include a sewage
system for that city among its future projects.
--------------------------------
FINANCING AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR
--------------------------------
¶13. (U) Private water suppliers in Costa Rica are severely limited.
All fresh water in Costa Rica is legal property of the state.
Landowners do not own the water that originates on/under their land
or flows over it, and groups of private landowners who provide
potable water or sewage services to themselves are on shaky legal
ground. Recent legal opinion has tended to confirm AyA's long
insistence that it, the municipalities, and regional authorities are
the sole legal providers of these services and everyone else (ASADAS
and landowner groups) must operate at the pleasure of AyA.
¶14. (U) Although AyA insists upon legal dominance in the water
sector, its true power is reflected by its ability to harness
private capital to develop public water infrastructure. According
to AyA Legal Director Rodolfo Lizano, AyA's current public-private
efforts are based on a 1968 law that stipulates when urban
infrastructure is not already built, a developer may build that
infrastructure and deliver it to AyA. In exchange, for a period of
5 years, subsequent land developers must first pay the developer who
built the infrastructure.
¶15. (U) One project, near the Manuel Antonio National Park on the
Pacific coast, has been successfully built and delivered to AyA.
Further north in the Coco/Sardinal area on the Gulf of Papagayo,
another project stalled because the inland community (Sardinal)
which is to supply water to a beach resort (Coco), protested.
Nevertheless, AyA and the Arias Administration acted decisively to
persuade community leaders that the project benefits the community.
It is likely to be finished. Two other projects in the Tamarindo
area will likewise be financed in the same manner, comments Lizano,
and are ready to move ahead once the controversy in Sardinal passes.
¶16. (U) The Executive President of AyA, Ricardo Sancho, has been a
strong proponent of public/private financing schemes and has also
commented that Costa Rica needs to be more willing than it has been
in the past to go into debt to build water and sewage projects. An
example is the $230 million sewer system project designed to serve a
portion of the San Jose Metropolitan Area. The Japan Development
Bank agreed to a $130 million loan (AyA pays $30 million; the GOCR
pays $100 million). AyA will finance the remaining $100 million
through rates levied on users of the system. This project is also
an illustration of the dangers inherent in the requirement that the
national legislature approve all sovereign debt. Despite the
manifest need for modern sewage treatment, this legislative project
languished for years and was finally approved in October of 2006
when Costa Rica was about to lose the Japanese loan.
-------------------------
ANY PROPOSALS FOR REFORM?
-------------------------
¶17. (U) Costa Rica's existing water law is over 60 years old, yet
concerted attempts to draft a new water law have stalled. Dr. Pedro
Leon, a top environmental advisor to President Arias, told Emboffs
on October 14 that the GOCR hopes to push a new "Water Resources
Law" through for approval in 2009 in concert with President Arias'
"Peace With Nature" initiative. The debate over water resources has
generated heated turf battles between AyA, ASADAs, ESPH, MINAET, the
Health Ministry, SENARA, and ARESEP.
¶18. (U) In addition, more philosophical objections are enunciated by
Carlos Manuel Rodriguez, ex-Minister of MINAET during ex-President
Pacheco's administration, who states that the current water bill is
more "commercial" (and therefore less acceptable) than the law
drafted during Rodriguez's tenure at MINAET. Rodriguez believes that
the legislature will not approve the water bill as currently
proposed. Nevertheless, both he and the Arias administration agree
on two types of water use payments (see para 8 above): a water use
fee ("canon de aprovechamiento de agua") and a pollution or
discharge fee ("canon de vertimiento al agua").
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶19. (SBU) Costa Rica's water sector presents great potential that is
stymied by ineffective law, interagency bickering, and AyA's
struggles to exert operational control while ceding a portion of its
expansion to private/public agreements. As with other public
infrastructure problems here (i.e., regarding highways, ports, and
electrical production), the continued public demand for potable
water will force actors in the sector to do something. The need for
large water and sewer projects in the booming Guanacaste tourist
areas and the rapidly growing San Jose Central Valley is generally
accepted, as is AyA's role as the lead institution in managing those
projects.
¶20. (SBU) However, we believe that any reform to existing water laws
is unlikely to advance during the remaining 18 months of the Arias
administration. There are simply too many more pressing legislative
and political challenges to address, such as the growing domestic
security problem and the impact of the world financial crisis. The
conflicting challenges of delivering improved water and wastewater
services in Costa Rica will likely wait until the next
administration takes office in 2010.
CIANCHETTE