

Currently released so far... 12453 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AORC
AMGT
APER
AU
AF
AS
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
AFIN
AR
AE
AJ
ADANA
AEMR
AG
ATRN
ADPM
APECO
AGAO
AMED
AX
AM
AL
ADCO
AA
AECL
AADP
ABUD
AMEX
ACAO
ANET
AODE
ASCH
AY
APEC
AID
AORG
ASEAN
AFSI
AFSN
AINF
AGR
AROC
AO
AMBASSADOR
AFFAIRS
ASIG
ABLD
ASUP
AND
ARM
ARF
AQ
ATFN
AC
ACOA
AORL
ADM
AUC
AGMT
ACABQ
ASEX
AFU
ALOW
AZ
APCS
AVERY
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AER
AN
AIT
AMG
AGRICULTURE
AMCHAMS
ACS
BR
BA
BD
BL
BO
BF
BU
BILAT
BEXP
BRUSSELS
BK
BN
BM
BT
BY
BX
BTIO
BIDEN
BG
BE
BP
BBSR
BC
BTIU
BWC
BB
BH
BMGT
CH
CY
CA
CU
CS
CO
CVIS
CPAS
CMGT
CE
COUNTER
CASC
COUNTRY
CJAN
COUNTERTERRORISM
CG
CI
CD
CIDA
CJUS
CDG
CBSA
CEUDA
CR
CM
CLMT
CAC
CBW
CODEL
COPUOS
CWC
CIC
CW
CBE
CHR
CFED
CT
CONS
CIA
CTM
CDC
CVR
CF
CLINTON
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CACS
CAN
CONDOLEEZZA
CB
CSW
CITT
CARSON
CNARC
CACM
CDB
CARICOM
COM
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CV
CKGR
CBC
CL
CICTE
CIS
ECON
EFIN
ELAB
ETRD
EIND
EC
EINV
EAGR
ENRG
ETTC
EAID
EPET
ELTN
EWWT
EAIR
EFIS
EMIN
EG
EU
ER
EUN
EPA
ENVI
EXTERNAL
ECPS
ENGR
ETRC
ECIN
EN
EI
ELN
ET
EINT
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ES
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EZ
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EFTA
EAIG
EK
EUREM
EURN
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EAP
ENIV
ECONOMY
ESA
EINN
ECONOMIC
EIAR
EXBS
ECA
ECUN
EINDETRD
EUR
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
ENERG
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFIM
ENGY
EAIDS
EINVEFIN
EINVETC
EUMEM
ETRA
ETC
ERNG
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EXIM
ERD
EEPET
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IO
IAHRC
ID
IC
IT
IRAQI
IWC
IN
IL
ISLAMISTS
IV
ICAO
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IPR
ICRC
INTERPOL
IQ
IBET
IMO
INR
ITRA
INTERNAL
ICJ
ICTY
IRS
ILO
INRA
INRO
ISRAELI
IEA
INRB
ITALY
ITU
IBRD
IIP
ILC
INTELSAT
IZPREL
IMF
INMARSAT
IRAJ
IDA
ICTR
IA
IGAD
IF
IDP
ITF
ISRAEL
IEFIN
IRC
IACI
KN
KCRM
KOMC
KNNPMNUC
KIPR
KPAL
KWBG
KSCA
KFRD
KNNP
KUNR
KTIP
KWMN
KSTC
KFLU
KOLY
KISL
KPAO
KMDR
KJUS
KSTH
KDEM
KCOR
KIRF
KAWC
KU
KTFN
KWAC
KNPP
KERG
KSEO
KACT
KHLS
KZ
KGHG
KTIA
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KE
KPKO
KCIP
KDRG
KVPR
KV
KIDE
KICC
KPRP
KBIO
KSUM
KGIT
KCFE
KG
KBTS
KFLO
KMPI
KS
KGIC
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KSEP
KTEX
KFSC
KOCI
KHDP
KPLS
KTDB
KHIV
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KMRS
KOM
KSAF
KRVC
KR
KMOC
KNAR
KIRC
KBCT
KSPR
KFIN
KBTR
KJUST
KNEI
KAWK
KGCC
KMCA
KREL
KMFO
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVRP
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KAID
KVIR
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KRAD
KPRV
KCMR
KPWR
KCHG
KIFR
KCFC
KICA
KPIN
KSCI
KESS
KDEV
KTBT
KCRS
KCGC
KOMS
KRIM
KTER
KREC
KPOA
KWWMN
KRGY
KPAK
KWNM
KMIG
KDDG
KRFD
KWMM
KWMNCS
KX
KRCM
KPAONZ
KNUC
KDEMAF
KNUP
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MCAP
MTCRE
MNUC
MIL
MX
MEDIA
MO
MPOS
MU
ML
MA
MP
MY
MERCOSUR
MG
MD
MW
MK
MAS
MEETINGS
MR
MT
MI
MOPPS
MASC
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MTRE
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
MARAD
MASSMNUC
MEPP
MCC
MZ
MILITARY
MDC
MRCRE
MC
MV
MIK
MUCN
NATO
NL
NZ
NPT
NI
NAFTA
NU
NDP
NIPP
NP
NPA
NG
NRR
NO
NSC
NEW
NE
NH
NR
NA
NS
NSF
NZUS
NATIONAL
NSG
NC
NT
NAR
NK
NGO
NV
NSFO
NSSP
NASA
NW
NPG
NORAD
NATOPREL
OTRA
OAS
OPRC
OIIP
OVIP
OREP
OPDC
OEXC
OSCE
OFFICIALS
OMIG
ODIP
OFDP
OECD
OPIC
OBSP
OPCW
OFDA
OTR
OSAC
OSCI
ON
OCII
OES
OVP
OIC
OPAD
OIE
OHUM
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PK
PHUM
PINS
PARM
PA
PTER
PINR
PREF
PHSA
PBTS
PBIO
PO
POL
PE
PARMS
PM
PROG
PL
PAK
POLITICS
PORG
PTBS
PNAT
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PROP
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PAO
PG
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PALESTINIAN
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PSEPC
PREFA
PGOVE
PINF
PHUMPGOV
PNG
PMIL
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
PLN
PSA
PGIV
POLINT
PAS
POGOV
PHUMPREL
PHUMBA
PEL
PGGV
PNR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PRAM
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PF
POV
PROV
PRL
PREO
PAHO
PHUH
PSI
PINL
PU
PRGOV
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
RS
RU
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RO
RW
RCMP
RF
RM
RFE
RSP
RP
RICE
ROBERT
ROOD
RELATIONS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RSO
SU
SNAR
SO
SOCI
SW
SENV
SMIG
SCUL
SP
SZ
SENVKGHG
SR
SY
SA
SYRIA
SF
SI
SC
SWE
SARS
STEINBERG
SN
SG
SIPRS
ST
SEVN
SL
SPCE
SNARIZ
SSA
SNARCS
SYR
SK
SPCVIS
SHUM
SIPDIS
SHI
SH
SOFA
SEN
SNARN
SAARC
SAN
SANC
SCRS
TRGY
TBIO
TU
TF
TERRORISM
TI
TSPL
TPHY
TH
TIP
TSPA
TC
TO
TW
TX
TZ
TNGD
TT
TL
TV
TFIN
TS
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TD
TK
TR
THPY
TP
TAGS
UNGA
UN
UK
US
UNC
UNSC
USUN
UG
UP
UY
USEU
UNESCO
USPS
USTR
UZ
UNHRC
UNO
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNHCR
UNCHR
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
USOAS
UNFICYP
UV
UNEP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDC
UNCHC
UNDP
UNCND
USNC
UNPUOS
UNICEF
UNCSD
UE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06WELLINGTON483, SOME QUESTION NZ'S DEFENSE STRATEGIES IN LIGHT OF RECENT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06WELLINGTON483.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06WELLINGTON483 | 2006-06-26 00:12 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO9887
RR RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0483/01 1770036
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 260036Z JUN 06
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2942
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 0809
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHJJAA/JICPAC HONOLULU HI
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000483
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR D (FRITZ), EAP/FO, AND EAP/ANP
NSC FOR VICTOR CHA
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISD LIZ PHU
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV NZ
SUBJECT: SOME QUESTION NZ'S DEFENSE STRATEGIES IN LIGHT OF RECENT
SPENDING INCREASES
REF: WELLINGTON 449
Summary
-------
¶1. (SBU) Embassy contacts have generally welcomed the defense
spending increases in this year's budget. Some question, however,
the general direction of New Zealand defense policy, and others
remain concerned about what they say are continued problems with NZ
Defense Force (NZDF) recruitment and retention. Although increased
defense spending does not feature high on the political concerns of
voters in New Zealand, this could change were social spending
reduced as a consequence. End summary.
Details of the increased funding
--------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) As noted reftel, the NZDF received an extra capital
injection of - NZD 72 million (approximately USD 4.5 million) on top
off baseline finding in the 2006/7 budget, as part of the Defense
Sustainability Initiative (DSI). (FYI: DSI is a 10-year initiative
announced last year designed to enhance recruitment and retention,
including by increasing salaries and upgrading facilities. At the
time the budget was announced, Defense Minister Phil Goff declared
that this new expenditure ensured that the Government will achieve
its goal of contributing in a meaningful way to international
affairs and rebuilding a "modern, professional, and well-equipped
Defence Force." The budget also includes an NZD 305 million
(approximately US 188 million) allocation to various capital
projects for the 2006/07 financial year, under the Long Term
Development Plan the Government launched in 2002.
News of capital injection of spending is well received
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶3. (SBU) The injection of capital from this year's Budget and the
financial certainty that the DSI guarantees is widely welcomed by
some analysts of New Zealand defense matters. Peter Cozens of the
Centre of Strategic Studies at Victoria University in Wellington
believes that with DSI, funding, plans and political commitments are
now in place to allow the NZDF to meet its future policy objectives.
Dr. Lance Beath, a former New Zealand defense official and diplomat
now at Victoria University's School of Government, agrees.
¶4. (SBU) The Director of the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre at
the Australian National University, Dr. Robert Ayson, a New
Zealander who was formerly an advisor on New Zealand's Parliamentary
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Select Committee, believes that
the capital injection will enable the defense establishment to meet
the expectations of the current Labour Government.
The political argument is less about spending, more about general
direction
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶5. (SBU) The National, NZ First and ACT Parties have complained
about what they say is a lack of coherence in the Government's
strategic decision-making. In particular, they have questioned
NZDF's asset acquisition in past years (such as Light Armored
Vehicles instead of tanks) and the dearth of Government White Papers
published since Labour took office in 1999.
¶6. (SBU) Paul Buchanan, an Auckland University security analyst who
often provides New Zealand media with blunt assessments of security
policy, believes that increasing expenditure is too simplistic a
cure for perceived defense ills in New Zealand. He believes that
New Zealand needs to align its strategic outlook with its resource
base, taking into account the country's location, and relevant
security threats. He argues that so long as the political argument
is about money alone and comparisons are made to larger states, New
Zealand will continue to drift with regards to its strategic
position.
No, it's about spending
-----------------------
¶7. (SBU) It is true that some analysts say New Zealand's per capita
military spending is insufficient compared to that in Australia.
Most compare the United States, United Kingdom, France or Germany.
The inference is that New Zealand is not pulling its weight on
matters of international security and instead is freeloading off the
WELLINGTON 00000483 002 OF 003
Australians and others. Beath notes that New Zealand is
historically parsimonious when it comes to defense spending,
especially when compared to Australia.
¶8. (SBU) However, Dr. Jim Rolfe, a former policy advisor in the
department of Prime Minister and Cabinet and now an Associate
Professor at the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies based in
Hawaii, believes that comparing New Zealand and Australian defense
budgets is not valid because of differing strategic perceptions and
needs. Buchanan agrees, saying it is "absurd to compare a small
country like New Zealand with the behemoths like the US and the UK,
or even Australia." Instead, he contends it's more logical to
compare New Zealand with other small democracies, such as Portugal,
Uruguay, Norway and Costa Rica who "each share a similar strategic
problem if not situation with New Zealand." Buchanan claims that
because these small democracies and New Zealand spend similar
amounts on defense, New Zealand is in the mainstream of defense
spending and foreign military commitment by small democracies.
Defense spending typically loses out to social spending
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶9. (SBU) New Zealand is also no different from other small
democracies when it comes to other spending priorities.
Historically, New Zealand budgets have allocated the majority of
funds to domestic social programs, particularly health, education
and welfare. Moreover, since the Vietnam War New Zealand
governments have -- in the absence of imminent threat -- been
reluctant to engage in sustained external military operations
without majority support. The Government's unwillingness to commit
combat troops to Iraq is testimony to this.
Defense spending not an issue that resonates with voters
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶10. (SBU) According to Beath "the average New Zealander is not
sophisticated enough to grasp the nuances of defense spending."
However, many more New Zealanders are critically aware of the new
post 9/11 security environment and the need to secure New Zealand's
immediate region and border from threats and to protect the region
from instability. Therefore, the recent increases in defense and
related regional and border security spending do not seem to have
resulted in any noticeable public outcry. But it is also unlikely
that renewed calls from National for greater military spending will
echo with New Zealand voters. Most New Zealanders still accept that
the physical defense of New Zealand's borders is dependant on the
country's larger military friends. Nor would they want to see
military spending eat into social welfare spending, a deeply-rooted
and widely accepted tradition in New Zealand.
Human capital most critical issue
---------------------------------
¶11. (SBU) Government and critics alike acknowledge that the most
critical issues facing New Zealand defense establishment is low
personnel retention and recruitment rates. In a buoyant labor
market, many highly skilled defense staff - civilian and military -
are being lured to other organizations by more attractive salary
packages. Cozens believes the loss of human capital is the greatest
challenge facing NZDF and greatly limits the country's operational
military capacity. Although he applauds the focus on building up
human capital in the DSI, Cozens notes that at present there is
barely a sufficient number of personnel to attend to the operational
obligations of the New Zealand Defence Force, a view endorsed by
Beath.
¶12. (SBU) The issue of personnel retention and recruitment is part
of the political debate. Ron Mark, defence spokesman for NZ First,
has campaigned on the need to apportion funding to increase defense
salaries across the board. This, he argues, is the key to
strengthening personnel retention and recruitment rates in the armed
services.
¶13. (SBU) In a recent appearance in front of Parliament's foreign
affairs, defence and trade committee, Goff announced that the shroud
of secrecy that has traditionally cloaked the SAS will be lifted,
albeit slightly, to offer more transparency. This pleased Mark,
himself a former member of the SAS, who though acknowledging the
need for secrecy on operational matters stated that the "the high
and sometimes unnecessary level of secrecy was hindering public
scrutiny of the [SAS] force." This, he argued, hindered the ability
to recruit and retain SAS troops given the competitive market for
their skills. Mark said that at present the members of Police
WELLINGTON 00000483 003 OF 003
Special Tactics Group are paid more than the SAS but are doing less
operationally.
¶14. (SBU) During the Committee hearing Goff also acknowledged NZDF
recruitment is difficult but has said that a "not ungenerous" pay
package introduced in 2005 went some way to address this issue. He
stated that the current defense salary range is from NZD 80,000 to
140,000 (USD49,000 to 86,000) including benefits. Yet despite this,
Goff concluded, the armed services would continue to struggle to
compete with lucrative private security contracts in Iraq, for
example, which can pay up to NZD 300,000 tax-free.
McCormick