

Currently released so far... 12453 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AORC
AMGT
APER
AU
AF
AS
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
AFIN
AR
AE
AJ
ADANA
AEMR
AG
ATRN
ADPM
APECO
AGAO
AMED
AX
AM
AL
ADCO
AA
AECL
AADP
ABUD
AMEX
ACAO
ANET
AODE
ASCH
AY
APEC
AID
AORG
ASEAN
AFSI
AFSN
AINF
AGR
AROC
AO
AMBASSADOR
AFFAIRS
ASIG
ABLD
ASUP
AND
ARM
ARF
AQ
ATFN
AC
ACOA
AORL
ADM
AUC
AGMT
ACABQ
ASEX
AFU
ALOW
AZ
APCS
AVERY
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AER
AN
AIT
AMG
AGRICULTURE
AMCHAMS
ACS
BR
BA
BD
BL
BO
BF
BU
BILAT
BEXP
BRUSSELS
BK
BN
BM
BT
BY
BX
BTIO
BIDEN
BG
BE
BP
BBSR
BC
BTIU
BWC
BB
BH
BMGT
CH
CY
CA
CU
CS
CO
CVIS
CPAS
CMGT
CE
COUNTER
CASC
COUNTRY
CJAN
COUNTERTERRORISM
CG
CI
CD
CIDA
CJUS
CDG
CBSA
CEUDA
CR
CM
CLMT
CAC
CBW
CODEL
COPUOS
CWC
CIC
CW
CBE
CHR
CFED
CT
CONS
CIA
CTM
CDC
CVR
CF
CLINTON
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CACS
CAN
CONDOLEEZZA
CB
CSW
CITT
CARSON
CNARC
CACM
CDB
CARICOM
COM
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CV
CKGR
CBC
CL
CICTE
CIS
ECON
EFIN
ELAB
ETRD
EIND
EC
EINV
EAGR
ENRG
ETTC
EAID
EPET
ELTN
EWWT
EAIR
EFIS
EMIN
EG
EU
ER
EUN
EPA
ENVI
EXTERNAL
ECPS
ENGR
ETRC
ECIN
EN
EI
ELN
ET
EINT
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ES
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EZ
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EFTA
EAIG
EK
EUREM
EURN
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EAP
ENIV
ECONOMY
ESA
EINN
ECONOMIC
EIAR
EXBS
ECA
ECUN
EINDETRD
EUR
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
ENERG
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFIM
ENGY
EAIDS
EINVEFIN
EINVETC
EUMEM
ETRA
ETC
ERNG
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EXIM
ERD
EEPET
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IO
IAHRC
ID
IC
IT
IRAQI
IWC
IN
IL
ISLAMISTS
IV
ICAO
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IPR
ICRC
INTERPOL
IQ
IBET
IMO
INR
ITRA
INTERNAL
ICJ
ICTY
IRS
ILO
INRA
INRO
ISRAELI
IEA
INRB
ITALY
ITU
IBRD
IIP
ILC
INTELSAT
IZPREL
IMF
INMARSAT
IRAJ
IDA
ICTR
IA
IGAD
IF
IDP
ITF
ISRAEL
IEFIN
IRC
IACI
KN
KCRM
KOMC
KNNPMNUC
KIPR
KPAL
KWBG
KSCA
KFRD
KNNP
KUNR
KTIP
KWMN
KSTC
KFLU
KOLY
KISL
KPAO
KMDR
KJUS
KSTH
KDEM
KCOR
KIRF
KAWC
KU
KTFN
KWAC
KNPP
KERG
KSEO
KACT
KHLS
KZ
KGHG
KTIA
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KE
KPKO
KCIP
KDRG
KVPR
KV
KIDE
KICC
KPRP
KBIO
KSUM
KGIT
KCFE
KG
KBTS
KFLO
KMPI
KS
KGIC
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KSEP
KTEX
KFSC
KOCI
KHDP
KPLS
KTDB
KHIV
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KMRS
KOM
KSAF
KRVC
KR
KMOC
KNAR
KIRC
KBCT
KSPR
KFIN
KBTR
KJUST
KNEI
KAWK
KGCC
KMCA
KREL
KMFO
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVRP
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KAID
KVIR
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KRAD
KPRV
KCMR
KPWR
KCHG
KIFR
KCFC
KICA
KPIN
KSCI
KESS
KDEV
KTBT
KCRS
KCGC
KOMS
KRIM
KTER
KREC
KPOA
KWWMN
KRGY
KPAK
KWNM
KMIG
KDDG
KRFD
KWMM
KWMNCS
KX
KRCM
KPAONZ
KNUC
KDEMAF
KNUP
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MCAP
MTCRE
MNUC
MIL
MX
MEDIA
MO
MPOS
MU
ML
MA
MP
MY
MERCOSUR
MG
MD
MW
MK
MAS
MEETINGS
MR
MT
MI
MOPPS
MASC
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MTRE
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
MARAD
MASSMNUC
MEPP
MCC
MZ
MILITARY
MDC
MRCRE
MC
MV
MIK
MUCN
NATO
NL
NZ
NPT
NI
NAFTA
NU
NDP
NIPP
NP
NPA
NG
NRR
NO
NSC
NEW
NE
NH
NR
NA
NS
NSF
NZUS
NATIONAL
NSG
NC
NT
NAR
NK
NGO
NV
NSFO
NSSP
NASA
NW
NPG
NORAD
NATOPREL
OTRA
OAS
OPRC
OIIP
OVIP
OREP
OPDC
OEXC
OSCE
OFFICIALS
OMIG
ODIP
OFDP
OECD
OPIC
OBSP
OPCW
OFDA
OTR
OSAC
OSCI
ON
OCII
OES
OVP
OIC
OPAD
OIE
OHUM
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PK
PHUM
PINS
PARM
PA
PTER
PINR
PREF
PHSA
PBTS
PBIO
PO
POL
PE
PARMS
PM
PROG
PL
PAK
POLITICS
PORG
PTBS
PNAT
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PROP
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PAO
PG
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PALESTINIAN
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PSEPC
PREFA
PGOVE
PINF
PHUMPGOV
PNG
PMIL
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
PLN
PSA
PGIV
POLINT
PAS
POGOV
PHUMPREL
PHUMBA
PEL
PGGV
PNR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PRAM
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PF
POV
PROV
PRL
PREO
PAHO
PHUH
PSI
PINL
PU
PRGOV
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
RS
RU
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RO
RW
RCMP
RF
RM
RFE
RSP
RP
RICE
ROBERT
ROOD
RELATIONS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RSO
SU
SNAR
SO
SOCI
SW
SENV
SMIG
SCUL
SP
SZ
SENVKGHG
SR
SY
SA
SYRIA
SF
SI
SC
SWE
SARS
STEINBERG
SN
SG
SIPRS
ST
SEVN
SL
SPCE
SNARIZ
SSA
SNARCS
SYR
SK
SPCVIS
SHUM
SIPDIS
SHI
SH
SOFA
SEN
SNARN
SAARC
SAN
SANC
SCRS
TRGY
TBIO
TU
TF
TERRORISM
TI
TSPL
TPHY
TH
TIP
TSPA
TC
TO
TW
TX
TZ
TNGD
TT
TL
TV
TFIN
TS
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TD
TK
TR
THPY
TP
TAGS
UNGA
UN
UK
US
UNC
UNSC
USUN
UG
UP
UY
USEU
UNESCO
USPS
USTR
UZ
UNHRC
UNO
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNHCR
UNCHR
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
USOAS
UNFICYP
UV
UNEP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDC
UNCHC
UNDP
UNCND
USNC
UNPUOS
UNICEF
UNCSD
UE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE365, AMCHAM'S DISCONTENT: OECD BLACKLISTS COSTA RICA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE365.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE365 | 2009-04-30 22:10 | 2011-03-21 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0002
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0365/01 1202210
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 302210Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0804
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RAYWEED/AUSTOECD PARIS OECD
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000365
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EEB/IFD/OIA:GHICKS
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN AND WHA/EPSC:AWONG
TREASURY FOR SSENICH
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN ECON PGOV PREL CS
SUBJECT: AMCHAM'S DISCONTENT: OECD BLACKLISTS COSTA RICA
¶1. (U) SUMMARY: Representatives of the American Chamber of Commerce
(AmCham) met with DCM and Emboffs on April 17 to make a strong case
against the recent OECD listing of Costa Rica on the tax haven
"blacklist". They argued that the OECD's decision, which seemed to
ignore the transparency of the 1991 Costa Rican-U.S. Tax Exchange
Information Agreement (TEIA), was totally inappropriate:
substantively incorrect, procedurally mishandled, and politically
motivated. In addition, AmCham expressed dismay at how quickly
Finance Minister Guillermo Zuniga acceded to the OECD listing by
submitting a letter pledging that the GOCR would consider new
legislation eliminating the need for a court order in order to open
bank account records (a prominent OECD complaint). Ostensibly,
Zuniga's action changed Costa Rica's OECD classification from the
"black list" to the "grey list." AmCham -- deeply concerned about
Costa Rica's reputation after the initial OECD announcement --
requested that the USG make a statement on Costa Rica's behalf.
Post countered that Zuniga could raise the issue (at his discretion)
in his meeting with Treasury officials on April 27 (on the margins
of the World Bank meeting in Washington). Of note, the GOCR has not
approached us about the "black list." See Action Request, para 11.
END SUMMARY.
-------------------------
AN EXPERIENCED DELEGATION
-------------------------
¶2. (U) Executive Director Lynda Solar, President Luis Gamboa, and
ex-presidents Humberto Pacheco and Hernan Pacheco represented
AmCham. Given that Humberto Pacheco negotiated the GOCR's TIEA in
the 80's, he led AmCham's presentation. Pacheco seemed personally
offended by the OECD's failure to acknowledge the effectiveness of
the existing TIEA with the US (in effect since 1991) and emphasized
the difficult five-year process of gaining legislative approval for
the TIEA.
¶3. (U) The AmCham representatives' believed the OECD decision was
based on the following factors (which also figured prominently in
local media reporting about the black listing):
-- Costa Rica does not tax overseas income; and
-- Costa Rica requires a court order to be obtained in order to open
any bank account records.
---------------------------
A DELEGATION WITH A MISSION
---------------------------
¶4. (U) AmCham adamantly disagreed with Costa Rica's classification
as a tax haven by the OECD and pressed that there are "no
technically valid reasons" to place Costa Rica on any tax haven
black list for three reasons:
-- Humberto Pacheco noted that a characteristic of a tax haven is
low taxes. Quite the contrary, Costa Rica has a high tax regime;
-- Typical tax havens do not disclose tax information to the proper
foreign counterparts. Pacheco claimed that Costa Rica consistently
cooperated with U.S. counterparts, abided by the TIEA with the US,
and exercised considerable control over its banking system through a
regulator. (NOTE: Pacheco was unaware of any European disclosure
requests. END NOTE.) He stated that, to his knowledge, never in
the history of the TIEA with the United States had a request for
information been denied. That is, judicial permission to access
account information requested by the IRS has always been
forthcoming; and
-- Costa Rica purposely designed its foreign tax regime to eliminate
any appearance of "ring fencing," the issue of treating foreign
source income differently, based on the residency of the taxpayer.
The GOCR made a conscious decision to exempt taxation of all foreign
source income for all taxpayers; thus, the law treats all taxpayers
the same on this issue, which, in Pacheco's words, "is a choice that
the government made. . . very wisely."
¶5. (SBU) In addition to the specific arguments on tax havens,
AmCham cited Costa Rica's role as a good neighbor in the war against
drugs and its fight against money laundering (it passed an
anti-money laundering law earlier this year). AmCham further argued
on the issue of the OECD's "Eurocentric" outlook. AmCham contended
that the four countries on the OECD's black list -- Costa Rica,
Uruguay, Malaysia, and Philippines -- had no ties to Europe. Thus,
the OCED selected easy targets -- countries without direct European
ties -- while overlooking European counties with questionable
practices on bank secrecy, i.e. Belgium, Switzerland, and/or
Luxembourg.
¶6. (SBU) AmCham disapproved of the "easy way out of this," as
proposed by Finance Minister Zuniga, of simply proposing changes in
the law regulating bank secrecy. Hernan Pacheco stated that AmCham
strongly opposed eliminating the requirement that a judge review any
request to open bank account records. Real or perceived abuses of
the power to open bank records, Pacheco added, could do enormous
harm to Costa Rica's democracy by altering Costa Ricans' perceptions
of (and confidence in) government. Furthermore, it isn't clear how
the government would truly guarantee the protection of privacy
rights (without the requirement for a judicial order).
---------------
SAY IT ISN'T SO
---------------
¶7. (SBU) Humberto Pacheco argued that "the US should not have
allowed [Angel] Guria [OECD Secretary General] to denigrate Costa
Rica's reputation, since there is not a technical reason [for Costa
Rica's presence on a black list]". Pacheco noted that the term "tax
haven black list" still lingers in the air, in spite of the OECD
elevating Costa Rica to the "grey list" five days after the "black
list" announcement. Pacheco, the ex-TIEA negotiator, continued,
"We're looking for a face-saving comment from the USG that helps
clear Costa Rica's reputation." "Whatever the inner workings of
this situation," Pacheco continued, "it was made to look like the
G20 originated this." He suggested the following points: "Costa
Rica has a TIEA with the US, has cooperated with the United States,
and has never denied access to requested bank information."
¶8. (SBU) We listened to the presentation and noted that GOCR's
delinquency on many issues, such as passing the anti-money
laundering law, could have played a part in the OECD decision.
Also, the DCM shared some of the findings provided informally to us
by Treasury (TREAS) prior to the AmCham meeting: (1) TREAS is not
comfortable with the OECD list-making, (2) nonetheless, TREAS
generally agreed with OECD's underlying goals, and (3) the US
Internal Revenue Service is reasonably comfortable with Costa Rica's
cooperation through the framework of the TIEA. However, we were
noncommittal about any USG statement in defense of Costa Rica, urged
AmCham to voice their concerns directly to the GOCR, and suggested
that Zuniga raise the issue at his meeting with Treasury on the
margins of the IMF/World Bank meeting April 27. We also said we
would report AmCham's concerns to Washington.
¶9. (SBU) In one notable follow-up, Finance Vice Minister Jenny
Phillips has invited Jeffrey Owens of the OECD's Center for Tax
Policy and Administration to Costa Rica for a review session of the
proposed legislation. The Ministry is girding itself for the
session by publicly noting that several other Latin American
countries also have bank secrecy laws, while stressing the GOCR's
cooperation on information requests.
--------------------------
COMMENT AND ACTION REQUEST
--------------------------
¶10. (SBU) The GOCR evidently does not share AmCham's concerns and
has not approached us. (In fact, we understand that Zuniga did not
discuss the issue during his meetings in Washington). We respect
AmCham's enthusiasm for (and expertise on) this issue, but believe
that the GOCR decided to quickly dispense with the issue by
promising to introduce legislation that would eliminate the need for
a court order to open bank account records. We doubt such
legislation could be passed quickly or easily (if at all) in Costa
Rica, but the pledge alone seemed to have satisfied the OECD.
Though an OECD designation can sully the reputation of a designee,
we understand that a designation carries no penalties or sanctions.
¶11. (SBU) ACTION REQUEST: In the aftermath of the controversy (which
we expect may re-surface here given the pending OECD review session,
we remain interested in others' views of the transparency and
fairness of the OECD ranking process. We would appreciate insight
from the Department, USEU, and/or Treasury. We cannot judge from
here, but AmCham makes a persuasive case against OECD's objectivity.
Why, for example, did the OECD rating seem to discount the
importance of a functioning TIEA between the GOCR and the USG?
CIANCHETTE