

Currently released so far... 12453 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AORC
AMGT
APER
AU
AF
AS
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
AFIN
AR
AE
AJ
ADANA
AEMR
AG
ATRN
ADPM
APECO
AGAO
AMED
AX
AM
AL
ADCO
AA
AECL
AADP
ABUD
AMEX
ACAO
ANET
AODE
ASCH
AY
APEC
AID
AORG
ASEAN
AFSI
AFSN
AINF
AGR
AROC
AO
AMBASSADOR
AFFAIRS
ASIG
ABLD
ASUP
AND
ARM
ARF
AQ
ATFN
AC
ACOA
AORL
ADM
AUC
AGMT
ACABQ
ASEX
AFU
ALOW
AZ
APCS
AVERY
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AER
AN
AIT
AMG
AGRICULTURE
AMCHAMS
ACS
BR
BA
BD
BL
BO
BF
BU
BILAT
BEXP
BRUSSELS
BK
BN
BM
BT
BY
BX
BTIO
BIDEN
BG
BE
BP
BBSR
BC
BTIU
BWC
BB
BH
BMGT
CH
CY
CA
CU
CS
CO
CVIS
CPAS
CMGT
CE
COUNTER
CASC
COUNTRY
CJAN
COUNTERTERRORISM
CG
CI
CD
CIDA
CJUS
CDG
CBSA
CEUDA
CR
CM
CLMT
CAC
CBW
CODEL
COPUOS
CWC
CIC
CW
CBE
CHR
CFED
CT
CONS
CIA
CTM
CDC
CVR
CF
CLINTON
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CACS
CAN
CONDOLEEZZA
CB
CSW
CITT
CARSON
CNARC
CACM
CDB
CARICOM
COM
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CV
CKGR
CBC
CL
CICTE
CIS
ECON
EFIN
ELAB
ETRD
EIND
EC
EINV
EAGR
ENRG
ETTC
EAID
EPET
ELTN
EWWT
EAIR
EFIS
EMIN
EG
EU
ER
EUN
EPA
ENVI
EXTERNAL
ECPS
ENGR
ETRC
ECIN
EN
EI
ELN
ET
EINT
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ES
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EZ
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EFTA
EAIG
EK
EUREM
EURN
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EAP
ENIV
ECONOMY
ESA
EINN
ECONOMIC
EIAR
EXBS
ECA
ECUN
EINDETRD
EUR
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
ENERG
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFIM
ENGY
EAIDS
EINVEFIN
EINVETC
EUMEM
ETRA
ETC
ERNG
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EXIM
ERD
EEPET
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IO
IAHRC
ID
IC
IT
IRAQI
IWC
IN
IL
ISLAMISTS
IV
ICAO
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IPR
ICRC
INTERPOL
IQ
IBET
IMO
INR
ITRA
INTERNAL
ICJ
ICTY
IRS
ILO
INRA
INRO
ISRAELI
IEA
INRB
ITALY
ITU
IBRD
IIP
ILC
INTELSAT
IZPREL
IMF
INMARSAT
IRAJ
IDA
ICTR
IA
IGAD
IF
IDP
ITF
ISRAEL
IEFIN
IRC
IACI
KN
KCRM
KOMC
KNNPMNUC
KIPR
KPAL
KWBG
KSCA
KFRD
KNNP
KUNR
KTIP
KWMN
KSTC
KFLU
KOLY
KISL
KPAO
KMDR
KJUS
KSTH
KDEM
KCOR
KIRF
KAWC
KU
KTFN
KWAC
KNPP
KERG
KSEO
KACT
KHLS
KZ
KGHG
KTIA
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KE
KPKO
KCIP
KDRG
KVPR
KV
KIDE
KICC
KPRP
KBIO
KSUM
KGIT
KCFE
KG
KBTS
KFLO
KMPI
KS
KGIC
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KSEP
KTEX
KFSC
KOCI
KHDP
KPLS
KTDB
KHIV
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KMRS
KOM
KSAF
KRVC
KR
KMOC
KNAR
KIRC
KBCT
KSPR
KFIN
KBTR
KJUST
KNEI
KAWK
KGCC
KMCA
KREL
KMFO
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVRP
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KAID
KVIR
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KRAD
KPRV
KCMR
KPWR
KCHG
KIFR
KCFC
KICA
KPIN
KSCI
KESS
KDEV
KTBT
KCRS
KCGC
KOMS
KRIM
KTER
KREC
KPOA
KWWMN
KRGY
KPAK
KWNM
KMIG
KDDG
KRFD
KWMM
KWMNCS
KX
KRCM
KPAONZ
KNUC
KDEMAF
KNUP
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MCAP
MTCRE
MNUC
MIL
MX
MEDIA
MO
MPOS
MU
ML
MA
MP
MY
MERCOSUR
MG
MD
MW
MK
MAS
MEETINGS
MR
MT
MI
MOPPS
MASC
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MTRE
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
MARAD
MASSMNUC
MEPP
MCC
MZ
MILITARY
MDC
MRCRE
MC
MV
MIK
MUCN
NATO
NL
NZ
NPT
NI
NAFTA
NU
NDP
NIPP
NP
NPA
NG
NRR
NO
NSC
NEW
NE
NH
NR
NA
NS
NSF
NZUS
NATIONAL
NSG
NC
NT
NAR
NK
NGO
NV
NSFO
NSSP
NASA
NW
NPG
NORAD
NATOPREL
OTRA
OAS
OPRC
OIIP
OVIP
OREP
OPDC
OEXC
OSCE
OFFICIALS
OMIG
ODIP
OFDP
OECD
OPIC
OBSP
OPCW
OFDA
OTR
OSAC
OSCI
ON
OCII
OES
OVP
OIC
OPAD
OIE
OHUM
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PK
PHUM
PINS
PARM
PA
PTER
PINR
PREF
PHSA
PBTS
PBIO
PO
POL
PE
PARMS
PM
PROG
PL
PAK
POLITICS
PORG
PTBS
PNAT
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PROP
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PAO
PG
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PALESTINIAN
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PSEPC
PREFA
PGOVE
PINF
PHUMPGOV
PNG
PMIL
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
PLN
PSA
PGIV
POLINT
PAS
POGOV
PHUMPREL
PHUMBA
PEL
PGGV
PNR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PRAM
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PF
POV
PROV
PRL
PREO
PAHO
PHUH
PSI
PINL
PU
PRGOV
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
RS
RU
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RO
RW
RCMP
RF
RM
RFE
RSP
RP
RICE
ROBERT
ROOD
RELATIONS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RSO
SU
SNAR
SO
SOCI
SW
SENV
SMIG
SCUL
SP
SZ
SENVKGHG
SR
SY
SA
SYRIA
SF
SI
SC
SWE
SARS
STEINBERG
SN
SG
SIPRS
ST
SEVN
SL
SPCE
SNARIZ
SSA
SNARCS
SYR
SK
SPCVIS
SHUM
SIPDIS
SHI
SH
SOFA
SEN
SNARN
SAARC
SAN
SANC
SCRS
TRGY
TBIO
TU
TF
TERRORISM
TI
TSPL
TPHY
TH
TIP
TSPA
TC
TO
TW
TX
TZ
TNGD
TT
TL
TV
TFIN
TS
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TD
TK
TR
THPY
TP
TAGS
UNGA
UN
UK
US
UNC
UNSC
USUN
UG
UP
UY
USEU
UNESCO
USPS
USTR
UZ
UNHRC
UNO
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNHCR
UNCHR
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
USOAS
UNFICYP
UV
UNEP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDC
UNCHC
UNDP
UNCND
USNC
UNPUOS
UNICEF
UNCSD
UE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA822, AUTO AND AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING INVESTMENT:
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA822.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA822 | 2005-03-18 18:06 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000822
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/CAN - BREESE
AND HOLST STATE PASS USTR FOR CHANDLER
USDOC FOR 4320/OFFICE OF NAFTA/GWORD/TFOX; 3134/OIO/WESTERN
HEMISPHERE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD EIND EINV CA
SUBJECT: AUTO AND AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING INVESTMENT:
CANADIAN GOVERNMENTS REJOIN THE SUBSIDY GAME
REF: (A) TORONTO 0430 (C) 04 TORONTO 0786
(B) TORONTO 0264 (D) CALGARY 068
SUMMARY/INTRODUCTION
--------------------
¶1. The GOC and the provincial government of Ontario will
contribute hundreds of millions of dollars toward
investments announced recently in central Canada's auto
plants. The federal, Quebec and Ontario governments
are also offering large new incentives to the aerospace
industry. This marks a significant return to the
industrial subsidies game by Canadian governments,
after a bipartisan trend toward more market-based
policies since 1984 (and a tough bout of deficit- fighting
since 1995).
¶2. In large part, these subsidy decisions reflect continued
competition among North American and European jurisdictions
for major auto and aerospace investments. (It bears noting
that U.S.- based firms, such as GM, Ford, and Pratt & Whitney,
are top beneficiaries of Canada's industrial incentives).
However, governments are also responding to anxiety
about Canada's manufacturing competitiveness, which is
fostered by several trends:
-- Canada's recently declining share of North American auto
manufacturing, as new plants locate increasingly southward;
-- Post- 2001 slumps in aerospace and information technology
exports;
-- Concerns about backsliding toward being an exporter of
energy, forest products and minerals, after decades of
struggle to increase the proportion of higher-value-added
exports;
-- The uncertainties faced by intensive users of the
U.S.-Canada border (a problem codified by Industry
Minister David Emerson as "border risk"), which are
thought to be deterring some foreign direct investment;
and
-- The appreciation in the value of the Canadian dollar
since early 2003.
END SUMMARY/INTRODUCTION
THE ANNOUNCEMENTS
-----------------
¶3. Ontario provincial funds are provided through the
"Ontario Automotive Investment Strategy" which was
unveiled in April 2004 with funding of C$500 million
(US$400 million) (ref A). GOC funds are provided
mainly through Industry Canada (notably a program
called Technology Partnerships Canada - TPC) and also
through Human Resources and Skills Development Canada.
The TPC fund provides funding for corporate research
and development which is nominally repayable if
products succeed commercially. In practice, TPC mainly
funds the aerospace industry and little is repaid. The
WTO-consistency of TPC's precursor was successfully
challenged in the mid-1990's by Brazil's Embraer, which
competes directly in the jet aircraft market with
Canada's Bombardier, and that dispute prompted the
program's reinvention as TPC.
¶4. AUTOS: On March 2, flanked by representatives of the
federal and Ontario governments, General Motors of Canada
Limited announced the "Beacon Project" -- C$2.5 billion
(about US$2 billion) in investments in its Canadian
facilities. Beacon will draw C$235 million in funds from
Ontario and C$200 million from the GOC. In November 2004,
Ford Motor Co. of Canada announced that it would receive
C$100 million from Ontario and a similar amount from the GOC
to redevelop its operations. DaimlerChrysler is reportedly
planning an auto plant investment which would also draw
government support. The key target for governments is a
possible investment by Toyota in a new assembly plant in
Ontario, which has not attracted a new auto plant in more
than a decade (ref C).
¶5. AIRCRAFT: TPC's single largest beneficiary is Pratt
& Whitney Canada Inc., which has received some C$500
million (US$400 million) from TPC. On January 13,
2005, the GOC announced a further C$207 million in TPC
funding for Pratt & Whitney to support various
aerospace research and development programs. On
February 22 the GOC announced C$115 million in TPC
funding for Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited.
Meanwhile, Bombardier, the world's third largest
aircraft maker after Boeing and Airbus, is playing
Canadian and British jurisdictions against each other
to manufacture its new C Series jet. The GOC, Quebec
and Ontario have all pledged hundreds of millions in
support. Bombardier is based in the Montreal area,
like Pratt & Whitney and Bell Helicopter, but it has
some facilities in Ontario which stand to win C Series
contracts.
EXPORT TRENDS: BACK TO LOGS AND ROCKS?
---------------------------------------
¶6. Canada's development was driven by successive waves of
natural resource extraction (fish, fur, timber, grain,
minerals, energy). A core mandate of Canada's trade and
industrial policies has always been to reduce this reliance
on natural resource-based exports. From the 1890's onward
this was approached through high tariffs on imported
manufactures, but Canada shifted to a trade-liberalizing
policy for autos in the 1960's and for most other goods in
the 1980's. By the late 1990's the "value added" goal
seemed to have been reached. Canadians built more than
twice as many cars as they purchased, and they were
successfully exporting not only vehicles but jet aircraft
(by Bombardier), telecommunications systems (by Nortel) and
nuclear reactors (by AECL).
¶7. Since 2000, a number of factors combined to deflate
this success. Simultaneous worldwide slumps in both
telecoms and aviation hit Nortel and Bombardier hard (along
with many related firms), with sharp and sustained drops in
their exports.
¶8. With a lack of major new investments in the auto
sector, combined with the closing of some older facilities,
Canada's ratio of "vehicle production to sales" - a simple
indicator of export success - was slipping (it had peaked in
1995 at more than 2, but by 2003 it had fallen to 1.6).
Flattening investment in the auto sector, which could be
overlooked while Nortel and Bombardier were setting export
records, became a concern when they lost their sparkle.
¶9. Meanwhile, the Canadian dollar appreciated strongly
in 2003-04, from under 65 cents to over 80 cents U.S.,
sharply trimming the competitiveness of Canadian
exports in the U.S. market. Ontario policymakers view
this as a key cause of recent downgrades in the
province's growth outlook (ref A).
¶10. In this context, the impressive run-up in demand and
prices for energy, building materials and other commodities
over the past few years is a mixed blessing in Canada: good
for the resource hinterland, but bad for the manufacturing
heartland. Strong commodity demand has resource exports
booming in both value and volume. In just three years from
2001-2004, exports of oil and gas grew 49 percent; refined
petroleum products, 49 percent; iron and steel, 68 percent;
and wood panel products, 99 percent. But for manufacturers,
the resource boom has not only driven input costs upward,
but can also be seen as a major cause of the currency
appreciation that hurts them in both foreign and domestic
markets.
¶11. In the past two years, oil, gas and refined petroleum
products overtook finished motor vehicles as Canada's main
export category. While this is an amazing upset in terms of
Canada's development since World War II, it is partly
explained (at least for now) by price and currency
movements. But with foreign investment (including Asian
investor interest) in Canada's oilpatch on a strong upward
track (ref B), the reversal could threaten to last unless
investment in autos and aerospace makes a comeback.
COULD "BORDER RISK" KILL INVESTMENT?
------------------------------------
¶12. Canadian Industry Minister David Emerson, an economist
and former industry CEO, has fretted publicly about Canada's
trade-dependence and competitiveness since he joined the GOC
at the end of 2003. Emerson was quick to acknowledge that
the world had shifted since the heyday of the rules-based
trading system in the 1990's. "We were in Nirvana because
we were trade-dependent, more so than anybody else in the
world. All of these institutional arrangements that were
being set up were really quite nice for us. . . . The
balance is starting to shift - and it's shifting in
worrisome ways."
¶13. Referring to "creeping protectionism" in the United
States, Emerson says it has gradually defeated the dispute
resolution model. "We can be five, six, seven years out and
we're still paying the duties. We're still paying the
lumber duties today, and we're getting hit on beef, and
we're getting hit on pork . . . And then along comes 9/11. .
. You realize that today the border is back. The border is
back with a vengeance. It's not fading anymore. It's
become a fundamental source of risk. . . Think about global
supply chains. . . . You're going to make an investment that
is designed to serve the North American if not the world
market . . . If those investments are systematically and
continuously biased toward the United States because of
border risk, we've got some big, big problems in Canada."
¶14. Canadian media have been quick to apply Emerson's
analysis to Toyota's impending decision about where to
locate a new assembly plant - suggesting that Canada could
be knocked out of contention for this and other plum foreign
direct investments because of "border risk. Meanwhile,
while he stresses that assembly plants are the industry's
"anchors," Emerson recently expressed a willingness to
assist parts manufacturers as well.
POLICY RESPONSE: DIRECT SUBSIDIES
----------------------------------
¶15. Liberal Parties currently hold power in the GOC as well
as in Ontario and Quebec. According to observers who are
close to the auto sector, the willingness of these
governments to put large subsidies into the auto industry
reflects three factors:
-- An appreciation that Canada has done
disproportionately well in attracting auto industry
investment in the past, and in leveraging this
investment into broader economic strength, and that
this success is worth holding onto;
-- The numbers and concentration of votes represented
by auto and aerospace workers in politically critical
areas; and
-- A view that there is no alternative but to "play the
game" and compete with other jurisdictions (primarily
U.S. States but also overseas locations) for auto and
aerospace plants.
COMMENT
-------
¶16. Comment: In retrospect, Canadian federal and
provincial governments' retreat from "industrial policies"
during the 1990's appears to have been driven more by
deficit problems than by a permanent change in philosophy.
Certain industries - such as autos, aerospace, and the
"cultural" sectors - will continue to have a political claim
on public resources. If nothing else, the across-the-board
retreat provided an opportunity to push a few industries -
such as shipbuilding, textiles, footwear, and some
agriculture - out of the tent.
DICKSON