

Currently released so far... 12453 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AORC
AMGT
APER
AU
AF
AS
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
AFIN
AR
AE
AJ
ADANA
AEMR
AG
ATRN
ADPM
APECO
AGAO
AMED
AX
AM
AL
ADCO
AA
AECL
AADP
ABUD
AMEX
ACAO
ANET
AODE
ASCH
AY
APEC
AID
AORG
ASEAN
AFSI
AFSN
AINF
AGR
AROC
AO
AMBASSADOR
AFFAIRS
ASIG
ABLD
ASUP
AND
ARM
ARF
AQ
ATFN
AC
ACOA
AORL
ADM
AUC
AGMT
ACABQ
ASEX
AFU
ALOW
AZ
APCS
AVERY
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AER
AN
AIT
AMG
AGRICULTURE
AMCHAMS
ACS
BR
BA
BD
BL
BO
BF
BU
BILAT
BEXP
BRUSSELS
BK
BN
BM
BT
BY
BX
BTIO
BIDEN
BG
BE
BP
BBSR
BC
BTIU
BWC
BB
BH
BMGT
CH
CY
CA
CU
CS
CO
CVIS
CPAS
CMGT
CE
COUNTER
CASC
COUNTRY
CJAN
COUNTERTERRORISM
CG
CI
CD
CIDA
CJUS
CDG
CBSA
CEUDA
CR
CM
CLMT
CAC
CBW
CODEL
COPUOS
CWC
CIC
CW
CBE
CHR
CFED
CT
CONS
CIA
CTM
CDC
CVR
CF
CLINTON
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CACS
CAN
CONDOLEEZZA
CB
CSW
CITT
CARSON
CNARC
CACM
CDB
CARICOM
COM
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CV
CKGR
CBC
CL
CICTE
CIS
ECON
EFIN
ELAB
ETRD
EIND
EC
EINV
EAGR
ENRG
ETTC
EAID
EPET
ELTN
EWWT
EAIR
EFIS
EMIN
EG
EU
ER
EUN
EPA
ENVI
EXTERNAL
ECPS
ENGR
ETRC
ECIN
EN
EI
ELN
ET
EINT
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ES
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EZ
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EFTA
EAIG
EK
EUREM
EURN
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EAP
ENIV
ECONOMY
ESA
EINN
ECONOMIC
EIAR
EXBS
ECA
ECUN
EINDETRD
EUR
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
ENERG
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFIM
ENGY
EAIDS
EINVEFIN
EINVETC
EUMEM
ETRA
ETC
ERNG
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EXIM
ERD
EEPET
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IO
IAHRC
ID
IC
IT
IRAQI
IWC
IN
IL
ISLAMISTS
IV
ICAO
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IPR
ICRC
INTERPOL
IQ
IBET
IMO
INR
ITRA
INTERNAL
ICJ
ICTY
IRS
ILO
INRA
INRO
ISRAELI
IEA
INRB
ITALY
ITU
IBRD
IIP
ILC
INTELSAT
IZPREL
IMF
INMARSAT
IRAJ
IDA
ICTR
IA
IGAD
IF
IDP
ITF
ISRAEL
IEFIN
IRC
IACI
KN
KCRM
KOMC
KNNPMNUC
KIPR
KPAL
KWBG
KSCA
KFRD
KNNP
KUNR
KTIP
KWMN
KSTC
KFLU
KOLY
KISL
KPAO
KMDR
KJUS
KSTH
KDEM
KCOR
KIRF
KAWC
KU
KTFN
KWAC
KNPP
KERG
KSEO
KACT
KHLS
KZ
KGHG
KTIA
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KE
KPKO
KCIP
KDRG
KVPR
KV
KIDE
KICC
KPRP
KBIO
KSUM
KGIT
KCFE
KG
KBTS
KFLO
KMPI
KS
KGIC
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KSEP
KTEX
KFSC
KOCI
KHDP
KPLS
KTDB
KHIV
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KMRS
KOM
KSAF
KRVC
KR
KMOC
KNAR
KIRC
KBCT
KSPR
KFIN
KBTR
KJUST
KNEI
KAWK
KGCC
KMCA
KREL
KMFO
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVRP
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KAID
KVIR
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KRAD
KPRV
KCMR
KPWR
KCHG
KIFR
KCFC
KICA
KPIN
KSCI
KESS
KDEV
KTBT
KCRS
KCGC
KOMS
KRIM
KTER
KREC
KPOA
KWWMN
KRGY
KPAK
KWNM
KMIG
KDDG
KRFD
KWMM
KWMNCS
KX
KRCM
KPAONZ
KNUC
KDEMAF
KNUP
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MCAP
MTCRE
MNUC
MIL
MX
MEDIA
MO
MPOS
MU
ML
MA
MP
MY
MERCOSUR
MG
MD
MW
MK
MAS
MEETINGS
MR
MT
MI
MOPPS
MASC
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MTRE
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
MARAD
MASSMNUC
MEPP
MCC
MZ
MILITARY
MDC
MRCRE
MC
MV
MIK
MUCN
NATO
NL
NZ
NPT
NI
NAFTA
NU
NDP
NIPP
NP
NPA
NG
NRR
NO
NSC
NEW
NE
NH
NR
NA
NS
NSF
NZUS
NATIONAL
NSG
NC
NT
NAR
NK
NGO
NV
NSFO
NSSP
NASA
NW
NPG
NORAD
NATOPREL
OTRA
OAS
OPRC
OIIP
OVIP
OREP
OPDC
OEXC
OSCE
OFFICIALS
OMIG
ODIP
OFDP
OECD
OPIC
OBSP
OPCW
OFDA
OTR
OSAC
OSCI
ON
OCII
OES
OVP
OIC
OPAD
OIE
OHUM
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PK
PHUM
PINS
PARM
PA
PTER
PINR
PREF
PHSA
PBTS
PBIO
PO
POL
PE
PARMS
PM
PROG
PL
PAK
POLITICS
PORG
PTBS
PNAT
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PROP
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PAO
PG
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PALESTINIAN
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PSEPC
PREFA
PGOVE
PINF
PHUMPGOV
PNG
PMIL
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
PLN
PSA
PGIV
POLINT
PAS
POGOV
PHUMPREL
PHUMBA
PEL
PGGV
PNR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PRAM
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PF
POV
PROV
PRL
PREO
PAHO
PHUH
PSI
PINL
PU
PRGOV
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
RS
RU
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RO
RW
RCMP
RF
RM
RFE
RSP
RP
RICE
ROBERT
ROOD
RELATIONS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RSO
SU
SNAR
SO
SOCI
SW
SENV
SMIG
SCUL
SP
SZ
SENVKGHG
SR
SY
SA
SYRIA
SF
SI
SC
SWE
SARS
STEINBERG
SN
SG
SIPRS
ST
SEVN
SL
SPCE
SNARIZ
SSA
SNARCS
SYR
SK
SPCVIS
SHUM
SIPDIS
SHI
SH
SOFA
SEN
SNARN
SAARC
SAN
SANC
SCRS
TRGY
TBIO
TU
TF
TERRORISM
TI
TSPL
TPHY
TH
TIP
TSPA
TC
TO
TW
TX
TZ
TNGD
TT
TL
TV
TFIN
TS
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TD
TK
TR
THPY
TP
TAGS
UNGA
UN
UK
US
UNC
UNSC
USUN
UG
UP
UY
USEU
UNESCO
USPS
USTR
UZ
UNHRC
UNO
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNHCR
UNCHR
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
USOAS
UNFICYP
UV
UNEP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDC
UNCHC
UNDP
UNCND
USNC
UNPUOS
UNICEF
UNCSD
UE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06WELLINGTON136, YEAR 2006 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - NEW ZEALAND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06WELLINGTON136.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06WELLINGTON136 | 2006-02-22 06:06 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO4485
RR RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0136/01 0530627
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 220627Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2416
INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 4304
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 0654
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 0031
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 WELLINGTON 000136
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EB/IPE-CLACROSSE AND EAP/ANP-DRICCI
STATE PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR JCHOE-GROVES
STATE PLEASE PASS TO USPTO FOR JURBAN
STATE PLEASE PASS TO LOC FOR STEPP
COMMERCE FOR JBOGER AND ABENAISSA/4530/ITA/MAC/AP/OSAO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KIPR ETRD ECON PREL NZ
SUBJECT: YEAR 2006 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - NEW ZEALAND
REF: A. STATE 14937
¶B. WELLINGTON 40
¶C. 05 WELLINGTON 334
(U) Sensitive but unclassified -- for U.S. government
channels only.
Summary
-------
¶1. (SBU) Post recommends that New Zealand remain off the
Special 301 List. Although the government has been
relatively slow in updating its intellectual property laws,
it is moving in the right direction. Moreover, New Zealand
in general already provides adequate and effective protection
of intellectual property rights.
¶2. (SBU) While the pharmaceutical industry urges that New
Zealand be placed on the list, post continues to believe that
the industry's restricted access to New Zealand's market
stems less from a failure to protect intellectual property
and more from the government's anti-competitive
drug-purchasing practices. In addition, we believe a Watch
Listing would not improve the industry's prospects. And,
while the music industry has legitimate concerns about New
Zealand's proposed exceptions to copyright protection, the
industry has noted that ongoing discussions with the
government may yet yield some of the changes the industry
seeks.
IPR in general
--------------
¶3. (U) Aside from a bill to establish a registration system
for geographical indications for wines and spirits, no
legislation related to intellectual property rights (IPR) was
introduced in the New Zealand Parliament in 2005. However,
New Zealand has several bills in the wings that would improve
its IPR regime. With few exceptions, the government is not
rolling back its protections of intellectual property.
¶4. (U) Proposed amendments to the Copyright Act 1994,
announced in June 2003, are intended to ensure that the act
reflects developments in digital technologies and
international developments in copyright. The amendments have
not yet been introduced in Parliament, and the timetable for
their submission is unknown. A draft Patents Bill was
released in December 2004. It would replace the Patents Act
1953 and is intended to bring New Zealand's patent law into
closer conformity with international standards. Public
submissions have been received, and the bill is being
revised.
¶5. (U) The Geographical Indications (Wine and Spirits)
Registration Bill would repeal and replace the Geographical
Indications Act 1994, which never came into force. The bill,
introduced in Parliament in June 2005, would establish a
registration system for geographical indications for wine and
spirits. It would put New Zealand in closer alignment with
the TRIPS agreement by using the agreement's definition for a
"geographical indication" and by clearly limiting
registration to geographical indications for wine and spirits
only.
¶6. (U) The Trade Marks Amendment Act 2005, containing minor
and technical changes to the Trade Marks Act 2002, came into
force in December 2005. The amendment act requires that the
applicant for registering a trademark be the "owner" of the
mark and clarifies provisions for revoking a trademark
registration for non-use.
¶7. (U) Meanwhile, New Zealand law continues to allow parallel
imports of certain copyrighted goods, which some U.S.
industries say complicates efforts to detect and combat
piracy and erodes the value of their products in the New
Zealand market. A ban on the parallel importation of films,
videos and DVDs for the initial nine months after a film's
international release -- enacted in October 2003 -- is
scheduled to sunset in 2008, unless extended.
The pharmaceutical issue
------------------------
¶8. (SBU) The pharmaceutical industry has a number of
legitimate complaints about its treatment in the New Zealand
market, and we continue to press for an improvement in this
WELLINGTON 00000136 002 OF 004
situation. However, the industry's concerns are not, at
heart, IPR problems. Rather, they are related to the process
by which the government decides which medicines are
subsidized and to the government's limited budget for drug
purchases (ref B). Post believes this market-access barrier
should be dealt with as such and not treated as a failure to
protect intellectual property. Even the industry's trade
association, Researched Medicines Industry Association of New
Zealand (RMI), concedes that the government's practices do
not violate its TRIPS commitments.
¶9. (SBU) The government also has mostly defined the issue as
a matter of ensuring affordable pharmaceutical prices for all
New Zealanders. Listing the country on the Watch List would
only enable the government to claim to the New Zealand public
that its policies protect the population against an
avaricious pharmaceutical industry. RMI also believes that
the likelihood of changes in the drug-purchasing system has
increased over the past year, especially with the
government's agreement after the September 17 elections to
review its medicines policy (ref B).
¶10. (SBU) It is true that the government's draft Patents Bill
fails to meet two of the industry's objectives in New
Zealand: (1) It does not allow patent protection for
diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical methods involving the
treatment of humans, as allowed under the TRIPS agreement,
and (2) it fails to extend the effective patent life of
drugs. The effective patent life (the period following
marketing approval, when patent holders have exclusive
control of their inventions) averages seven years in New
Zealand. Moreover, the draft bill leaves in place an
amendment to the Patents Act that allows competitors to begin
the process required for regulatory approval of a generic
product while a proprietary drug still is under patent.
¶11. (SBU) Although the draft is unsatisfactory, we believe
that listing New Zealand because of the draft legislation
would reduce our ability to influence the bill's final
provisions. We continue to press New Zealand government
officials with our concerns with the draft bill.
Format- and time-shifting
-------------------------
¶12. (U) Proposed amendments to the Copyright Act 1994 include
provisions that would allow format-shifting, or the
duplication of sound recordings to another format for a
purchaser's private use without the copyright owner's
permission. The amendments also would extend to all
communication works a provision in the Copyright Act that
permits time-shifting, or the recording of a broadcast or
cable program for private use solely for the purpose of
viewing or listening to the recording at a more convenient
time or for making a complaint.
¶13. (SBU) The industry contends that such exceptions to
copyright protection send the wrong message to consumers,
undermine efforts to curb unauthorized copying of CDs,
discourage innovation and cost the industry in sales and
profits. The government and industry continue to discuss
these exceptions, and the government has said it would be
flexible on this issue and aim for a conclusion satisfactory
to the industry, while also addressing the government's
concerns regarding fairness to consumers. We will continue
to encourage this dialogue. With such discussions ongoing,
we believe a Special 301 listing over this issue would be
premature and counterproductive.
Optical media piracy
--------------------
¶14. (U) While New Zealand does not have any regulations
specifically addressing optical media manufacturing, the
Copyright Act 1994 -- including protections and sanctions for
copyright infringement -- applies to optical media. We are
not aware of significant problems with optical media piracy
in New Zealand.
Use/procurement of government software
--------------------------------------
¶15. (U) New Zealand has no specific guidelines relating to
government use or procurement of software, but it does have
general rules pertaining to protection of intellectual
property in the public sector.
WELLINGTON 00000136 003 OF 004
TRIPS compliance
----------------
¶16. (U) The draft Patents Bill would help align New Zealand's
patent law with that of other developed countries. The draft
would keep the maximum patent term at 20 years, but would
tighten the criteria for issuing a patent, requiring that a
patentable invention be new anywhere in the world (instead of
new in New Zealand), involve an inventive step and be useful.
The proposed amendments to the Copyright Act 1994 aim to
ensure the act encompasses developments in digital
technology. For example, the definition of "copying" would
be clarified to include digital works. A draft Plant Variety
Rights Amendment Bill, released in August 2005, is intended
to give rights owners enhanced exclusive rights over their
protected plant varieties, in line with the 1991 revision of
the International Convention for the Protection of New
Varieties of Plants. The amendment aims to address
significant advances in plant breeding techniques, as well as
international developments. The Trade Marks Amendment Act
2005, which came into force in December 2005, contains minor
and technical changes to the Trade Marks Act 2002 (see
Paragraph 5).
¶17. (U) New legislation introduced in Parliament in 2005
included the Geographical Indications (Wine and Spirits)
Registration Bill (see Paragraph 5).
¶18. (U) We are unaware of any new legislation related
specifically to domestic protection of traditional knowledge
or expressions of folklore. However, the proposed changes to
the Patents Act 1953 include a provision to set up a Maori
consultative committee that would advise the patents
commissioner on whether a patent application pertains to an
invention that is derived from Maori traditional knowledge,
indigenous plants or animals and whether the commercial
exploitation of such an invention would be contrary to Maori
values.
¶19. (U) Under the Medicines Amendment Act 1994, New Zealand
provides data exclusivity -- a period during which government
officials respect the confidentiality of data submitted to
them in applications for marketing approval for medicines --
for five years. Such data exclusivity does not extend to new
uses or formulations of old active ingredients.
¶20. (U) New Zealand Customs can confiscate and destroy
pirated products if the holder of the trademark or copyright
has requested that Customs detain the goods. That request is
valid for five years and can be renewed. However, Customs
does not have the power to prosecute. Rights holders can
pursue relief through civil lawsuits and have 10 working days
to do so. Otherwise, the goods are released or, at the
importer's request, destroyed. The provisions apply only to
trademarks and copyright registered in New Zealand. Customs
has no authority to detain infringing IP goods from being
exported. Customs detained 101,734 goods for bearing
infringing marks or signs in 2005, down from a 10-year high
of 142,055 in 2001. However, the number of shipments
investigated by Customs has risen steadily over the last
decade, from one in 1995 to 683 in 2005. Almost all the
infringing goods originated in Asia, particularly China, and
most of the intercepted and investigated goods were clothing,
footwear and headwear. The number of pirated CDs and DVDs
intercepted by Customs has declined sharply, after peaking in
early 2005. It appears that CDs and DVDs increasingly are
being copied to order within New Zealand, making detection of
local production difficult. The New Zealand Department of
Internal Affairs has had some success, however, in stemming
domestic sales of pirated and counterfeit products by closing
down e-auction sites. In January, 97 sites were shut down.
Enforcement
-----------
¶21. (U) The New Zealand government is committed to adequately
and effectively enforcing its IPR-related laws, as reflected
by the creation of new criminal offenses for trademark
infringements and the increases in penalties for copyright
infringements under the Trade Marks Act 2002, which entered
into force in August 2003. In most instances, the government
responds to complaints raised by rights holders rather than
initiating action against IP infringers. Those complaints
have been relatively few, and so the government does not
WELLINGTON 00000136 004 OF 004
track enforcement-related statistics, such as civil and
criminal penalties. The government lacks a central body to
coordinate the sharing of information on illegal IP
activities and enforcement efforts.
WCT/WPPT
--------
¶22. (U) Amendments to the Copyright Act 1994, proposed in
June 2003, would make the act more consistent with the World
Intellectual Property Organization Copyright Treaty (WCT) and
Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT). If the proposed
amendments are passed, the government would decide whether to
accede to the WCT and WPPT.
Training
--------
¶23. (U) New Zealand has close relations with the Pacific
Islands, providing them with disaster relief, development aid
and, in a few cases, peacekeeping assistance. It could play
a larger role in helping the Pacific Islands strengthen their
IPR regimes. At least one New Zealand program aims to combat
piracy in Pacific Island nations (ref C). New Zealand might
benefit from "training the trainer"-type programs, equipping
New Zealanders to help the islands improve IPR enforcement.
McCormick