

Currently released so far... 12453 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AORC
AMGT
APER
AU
AF
AS
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
AFIN
AR
AE
AJ
ADANA
AEMR
AG
ATRN
ADPM
APECO
AGAO
AMED
AX
AM
AL
ADCO
AA
AECL
AADP
ABUD
AMEX
ACAO
ANET
AODE
ASCH
AY
APEC
AID
AORG
ASEAN
AFSI
AFSN
AINF
AGR
AROC
AO
AMBASSADOR
AFFAIRS
ASIG
ABLD
ASUP
AND
ARM
ARF
AQ
ATFN
AC
ACOA
AORL
ADM
AUC
AGMT
ACABQ
ASEX
AFU
ALOW
AZ
APCS
AVERY
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AER
AN
AIT
AMG
AGRICULTURE
AMCHAMS
ACS
BR
BA
BD
BL
BO
BF
BU
BILAT
BEXP
BRUSSELS
BK
BN
BM
BT
BY
BX
BTIO
BIDEN
BG
BE
BP
BBSR
BC
BTIU
BWC
BB
BH
BMGT
CH
CY
CA
CU
CS
CO
CVIS
CPAS
CMGT
CE
COUNTER
CASC
COUNTRY
CJAN
COUNTERTERRORISM
CG
CI
CD
CIDA
CJUS
CDG
CBSA
CEUDA
CR
CM
CLMT
CAC
CBW
CODEL
COPUOS
CWC
CIC
CW
CBE
CHR
CFED
CT
CONS
CIA
CTM
CDC
CVR
CF
CLINTON
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CACS
CAN
CONDOLEEZZA
CB
CSW
CITT
CARSON
CNARC
CACM
CDB
CARICOM
COM
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CV
CKGR
CBC
CL
CICTE
CIS
ECON
EFIN
ELAB
ETRD
EIND
EC
EINV
EAGR
ENRG
ETTC
EAID
EPET
ELTN
EWWT
EAIR
EFIS
EMIN
EG
EU
ER
EUN
EPA
ENVI
EXTERNAL
ECPS
ENGR
ETRC
ECIN
EN
EI
ELN
ET
EINT
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ES
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EZ
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EFTA
EAIG
EK
EUREM
EURN
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EAP
ENIV
ECONOMY
ESA
EINN
ECONOMIC
EIAR
EXBS
ECA
ECUN
EINDETRD
EUR
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
ENERG
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFIM
ENGY
EAIDS
EINVEFIN
EINVETC
EUMEM
ETRA
ETC
ERNG
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EXIM
ERD
EEPET
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IO
IAHRC
ID
IC
IT
IRAQI
IWC
IN
IL
ISLAMISTS
IV
ICAO
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IPR
ICRC
INTERPOL
IQ
IBET
IMO
INR
ITRA
INTERNAL
ICJ
ICTY
IRS
ILO
INRA
INRO
ISRAELI
IEA
INRB
ITALY
ITU
IBRD
IIP
ILC
INTELSAT
IZPREL
IMF
INMARSAT
IRAJ
IDA
ICTR
IA
IGAD
IF
IDP
ITF
ISRAEL
IEFIN
IRC
IACI
KN
KCRM
KOMC
KNNPMNUC
KIPR
KPAL
KWBG
KSCA
KFRD
KNNP
KUNR
KTIP
KWMN
KSTC
KFLU
KOLY
KISL
KPAO
KMDR
KJUS
KSTH
KDEM
KCOR
KIRF
KAWC
KU
KTFN
KWAC
KNPP
KERG
KSEO
KACT
KHLS
KZ
KGHG
KTIA
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KE
KPKO
KCIP
KDRG
KVPR
KV
KIDE
KICC
KPRP
KBIO
KSUM
KGIT
KCFE
KG
KBTS
KFLO
KMPI
KS
KGIC
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KSEP
KTEX
KFSC
KOCI
KHDP
KPLS
KTDB
KHIV
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KMRS
KOM
KSAF
KRVC
KR
KMOC
KNAR
KIRC
KBCT
KSPR
KFIN
KBTR
KJUST
KNEI
KAWK
KGCC
KMCA
KREL
KMFO
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVRP
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KAID
KVIR
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KRAD
KPRV
KCMR
KPWR
KCHG
KIFR
KCFC
KICA
KPIN
KSCI
KESS
KDEV
KTBT
KCRS
KCGC
KOMS
KRIM
KTER
KREC
KPOA
KWWMN
KRGY
KPAK
KWNM
KMIG
KDDG
KRFD
KWMM
KWMNCS
KX
KRCM
KPAONZ
KNUC
KDEMAF
KNUP
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MCAP
MTCRE
MNUC
MIL
MX
MEDIA
MO
MPOS
MU
ML
MA
MP
MY
MERCOSUR
MG
MD
MW
MK
MAS
MEETINGS
MR
MT
MI
MOPPS
MASC
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MTRE
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
MARAD
MASSMNUC
MEPP
MCC
MZ
MILITARY
MDC
MRCRE
MC
MV
MIK
MUCN
NATO
NL
NZ
NPT
NI
NAFTA
NU
NDP
NIPP
NP
NPA
NG
NRR
NO
NSC
NEW
NE
NH
NR
NA
NS
NSF
NZUS
NATIONAL
NSG
NC
NT
NAR
NK
NGO
NV
NSFO
NSSP
NASA
NW
NPG
NORAD
NATOPREL
OTRA
OAS
OPRC
OIIP
OVIP
OREP
OPDC
OEXC
OSCE
OFFICIALS
OMIG
ODIP
OFDP
OECD
OPIC
OBSP
OPCW
OFDA
OTR
OSAC
OSCI
ON
OCII
OES
OVP
OIC
OPAD
OIE
OHUM
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PK
PHUM
PINS
PARM
PA
PTER
PINR
PREF
PHSA
PBTS
PBIO
PO
POL
PE
PARMS
PM
PROG
PL
PAK
POLITICS
PORG
PTBS
PNAT
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PROP
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PAO
PG
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PALESTINIAN
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PSEPC
PREFA
PGOVE
PINF
PHUMPGOV
PNG
PMIL
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
PLN
PSA
PGIV
POLINT
PAS
POGOV
PHUMPREL
PHUMBA
PEL
PGGV
PNR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PRAM
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PF
POV
PROV
PRL
PREO
PAHO
PHUH
PSI
PINL
PU
PRGOV
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
RS
RU
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RO
RW
RCMP
RF
RM
RFE
RSP
RP
RICE
ROBERT
ROOD
RELATIONS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RSO
SU
SNAR
SO
SOCI
SW
SENV
SMIG
SCUL
SP
SZ
SENVKGHG
SR
SY
SA
SYRIA
SF
SI
SC
SWE
SARS
STEINBERG
SN
SG
SIPRS
ST
SEVN
SL
SPCE
SNARIZ
SSA
SNARCS
SYR
SK
SPCVIS
SHUM
SIPDIS
SHI
SH
SOFA
SEN
SNARN
SAARC
SAN
SANC
SCRS
TRGY
TBIO
TU
TF
TERRORISM
TI
TSPL
TPHY
TH
TIP
TSPA
TC
TO
TW
TX
TZ
TNGD
TT
TL
TV
TFIN
TS
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TD
TK
TR
THPY
TP
TAGS
UNGA
UN
UK
US
UNC
UNSC
USUN
UG
UP
UY
USEU
UNESCO
USPS
USTR
UZ
UNHRC
UNO
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNHCR
UNCHR
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
USOAS
UNFICYP
UV
UNEP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDC
UNCHC
UNDP
UNCND
USNC
UNPUOS
UNICEF
UNCSD
UE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08OTTAWA274,
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08OTTAWA274.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08OTTAWA274 | 2008-02-22 20:08 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO8921
RR RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0274/01 0532007
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 222007Z FEB 08 ZFR
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7352
INFO RHEHAAA/WHITEHOUSE WASHDC
RUEAHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHDC
RHEBAAA/DOE WASHDC
RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 29 OTTAWA 000274
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR S/CT (Robertson), WHA/CAN (Fox)
WHITEHOUSE FOR HSC
DHS for International Affairs
DHS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION
DOE FOR P&I
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ASEC ECON PTER PREL PGOV ETTC EAID EAGR EFIN KHLS
CA
SUBJ: CI/KR Response for S/CT: Canada's Critical Infrastructure
(CI) and Key Resources (KR)
OTTAWA 00000274 001.2 OF 029
ZFR/////////////ZFR//////////////ZFR///////// ///////ZFR///////ZFR
PLEASE CANCEL OTTAWA 274 IMI OTTAWA 274. CABLE HAS BEEN RE-SENT
WITH NEW NUMBERS.
SORRY FOR ANY INCONVENIENCE.
ZFR///////////ZFR///////////////ZFR////////// ///////ZFR///////ZFR
OTTAWA 00000274 002 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
Toronto would be felt instantly on U.S. markets.
¶B. (SBU) Chemical & Hazardous Materials - Canada's main
petrochemical complex is at Sarnia, Ontario, opposite Port Huron,
Michigan, where major oil and gas pipelines from western Canada
terminate. Sarnia and Port Huron are both relatively small towns
OTTAWA 00000274 003 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
and they share resources, such as chemical spill response teams, in
emergencies. Also, Canada is the world's largest single producer of
uranium, accounting for about one-third of the world's uranium mine
output. Cameco's refinery at Blind River, Ontario takes uranium
oxide concentrate (U3O8) from mines in Canada and abroad and refines
it to UO3, an intermediate product. The UO3 is trucked to Port Hope,
OTTAWA 00000274 004 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
Ontario (on the shores of Lake Ontario) where Cameco has about
one-quarter of the Western world's uranium hexafluoride (UF6)
conversion capacity - 12,400 metric tons per year. The uranium
hexafluoride is then shipped outside Canada for enrichment
(including in the United States) for use in light water reactors.
Disruption of uranium mining activities in Saskatchewan or the
OTTAWA 00000274 005 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
milling and conversion facilities in Ontario could impact fuel
supply for American nuclear power plants. Destruction, disruption
or exploitation of the Port Hope plant could lead to radiological
contamination of American territory in New York state.
¶C. (SBU) Defense Industrial Base - The "Stryker" armored vehicle for
OTTAWA 00000274 006 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
the U.S. Army is built by General Dynamics; the structure,
fabrication and final assembly of the "Stryker" takes place in
London, Ontario (and also at Anniston, Alabama). Disruption at the
Ontario plant would impact acquisition and deployment of the
"Stryker."
OTTAWA 00000274 007 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
¶D. (SBU) Emergency Services - Response plans exist at the federal,
state/provincial and local levels to deal with cross-border
emergency response. For example, The Joint Inland Pollution
Contingency Plan is aimed at developing a coordinated and integrated
response between Canadian and United States governments to pollution
incidents and Mutual Aid pacts exist at the local level between
OTTAWA 00000274 008 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Qnada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
towns in the U.S. and in Canada, as in Port Huron - Sarnia (see B
above). Were these cross-border services disrupted, adequate
emergency response might be otherwise unavailable.
¶E. (SBU) Energy - Canada is the largest source of U.S. imports of
oil, natural gas, electricity and uranium; the United States exports
OTTAWA 00000274 009 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
electricity, coal and petroleum products to Canada. This energy
trade is carried by a shared web of oil and gas pipelines, and our
interconnected electricity grid. On the Canadian side of the
border, the private sector owns over 85 per cent of the energy
infrastructure. Our interdependent relationship was highlighted
dramatically in August, 2003, when approximately 50 million people
OTTAWA 00000274 010 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
in Ontario and seven U.S. states suffered a blackout of more than 48
hours due to a failure of our shared electricity grid (precipitated
by a fault at an Ohio power plant).
¶F. (SBU) Food & Agriculture - Canada and the United States are
engaged in a high volume of trade in agricultural products and
OTTAWA 00000274 011 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
seafood; the potential impact on the U.S. of agro-terrorism or
bioterrorism at a Canadian food facility would be correspondingly
high. The top five agri-food imports into the U.S. from Canada are:
baked goods (including pasta and breakfast cereals), beef,
beverages, vegetables and pork.
OTTAWA 00000274 012 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
¶G. (SBU) Information Technology - Millions of Americans rely on the
BlackBerry device produced by Research in Motion (RIM) of Waterloo,
Ontario; its network operations center in Ontario processes every
e-mail message to or from a BlackBerry. In early February 2008 more
than 5 million users were left without BlackBerry connectivity for
up to 24 hours during a technical upgrade, underscoring the
OTTAWA 00000274 013 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
cross-border impact of any disruption to RIM's Ontario facilities.
¶H. (SBU) National Monuments & Icons - Niagara Falls is located on
the Ontario-New York border and ranks high as a "North American"
icon (the Canadian "Horseshoe falls" is probably the most
picturesque portion). Disruption at this locale would likely have
OTTAWA 00000274 014 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
wide-ranging psycho-social impacts globally.
¶I. (SBU) Postal & Shipping - The St. Lawrence Seaway, jointly
managed by the U.S. and Canada, with its system of locks allows
ocean-going vessels to move between the high seas into the Great
Lakes, and facilitates ship-borne commerce between American and
OTTAWA 00000274 015 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
Canadian ports on the Great Lakes. Almost 50 percent of Seaway
traffic travels to and from overseas ports, especially those in
Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Disruption on the seaway would
create a cascade of logistics problems for many shippers in the
Great Lakes states.
OTTAWA 00000274 016 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
¶J. (SBU) Public Health and Healthcare - Approximately 3,500 Canadian
health care workers commute to the Detroit region on a daily basis,
and that number is expected to increase as Michigan health care
facilities continue recruiting in Canada due to an ongoing nursing
shortage. Disruption of this commute (via disinformation, attacks
on transport or bridges, for example) would directly and immediately
OTTAWA 00000274 017 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
impact health care for thousands of Michigan residents.
¶K. (SBU) Telecommunications - Canadian telecoms companies carry
Canadian defense communications into the U.S. where they link up
with U.S. networks. Canadian financial institutions with large U.S.
holdings and operations (e.g. Bank of Montreal with Harris Bank;
OTTAWA 00000274 018 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
Toronto Dominion with TD Banknorth; and Royal Bank of Canada with
Centura) use Canadian telecom networks to relay critical financial
data. Much command and control functionality for cross-border
electricity grids and pipelines is carried on Canadian telecoms
networks. Disruption to telecoms systems in Canada would have
immediate and deleterious effect on United States interests.
OTTAWA 00000274 019 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
¶L. (SBU) Transportation - The value of goods transported annually
across a single bridge, the Ambassador bridge, between Detroit,
Michigan and Windsor, Ontario (valued at approximately US$108
billion in 2006), is more than the entire annual merchandise trade
between the United States and the United Kingdom (US$98 billion in
OTTAWA 00000274 020 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
2006). Destruction or disruption of this bridge would have a
significant impact on, inter alia, the highly integrated North
American automotive industry.
¶M. (SBU) Water - The Point Roberts Water District in Washington
state draws 840,000 gallons of water per day for its residents from
OTTAWA 00000274 021 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
the Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) from a reservoir located
in Delta, British Columbia. Disruption of this supply would create
significant distress for the population of this diminutive United
States exclave.
¶N. (SBU) Commercial Facilities - NAVCanada (NAVCAN) is the private,
OTTAWA 00000274 022 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
not-for-profit operator of Canada's civil air navigation system;
NAVCAN manages all transatlantic air traffic between Iceland and
North American landfall. Disruption of this service would affect
(cancel or postpone) hundreds of transatlantic flights per day.
¶O. (SBU) Dams - Three dams in British Columbia regulate the flow of
OTTAWA 00000274 023 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
the Columbia River into the United States. The Mica, Hugh
Keenleyside and Duncan dams were built as a result of the Columbia
River Treaty, signed by Canada and the United States in 1964. The
Treaty dams provide flood control, and they are essential to the
maintenance of power generation at hydro-electric plants in the
United States. Flooding and/or loss of electricity generation
OTTAWA 00000274 024 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
capacity in the United States could result if the dams were
destroyed or otherwise exploited.
¶P. (SBU) Government Facilities - NORAD, the North American Aerospace
Defense Command, is an integrated bi-national United States and
Canadian organization charged with the missions of aerospace warning
OTTAWA 00000274 025 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
and aerospace control for North America. One of three subordinate
regional HQs is located in Canada, at Winnipeg, Manitoba (the other
two regional HQs are in Alaska and Florida).
¶Q. (SBU) Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs)- In Ontario ten operating
nuclear reactor units are situated at Pickering and Darlington on
OTTAWA 00000274 026 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
Lake Ontario facing New York State (roughly 60 miles north-east of
Buffalo). Another six operating nuclear reactor units are situated
on the shores of Lake Huron, adjacent to Lake Superior. One nuclear
reactor is located in New Brunswick adjacent to the Bay of Fundy,
about 45 miles from the New Brunswick-Maine border, and one is
situated in Quebec on the south shore of the St. Lawrence River
OTTAWA 00000274 027 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
about 100 miles north of the Quebec-Vermont border. If an NPP
containment facility were breached and radiological materials were
released some contamination of U.S. territory (land or water) might
be expected.
¶6. (SBU) Comment: The inventory of critical infrastructure and key
OTTAWA 00000274 028 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
resources that we have compiled here is illustrative, not
exhaustive. Post believes that a more comprehensive listing might
be obtained from the Department of Homeland Security.
¶7. (U) This message was cleared with DHS Attach at Mission Canada.
OTTAWA 00000274 029 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
Wilkins