

Currently released so far... 12453 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AORC
AMGT
APER
AU
AF
AS
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
AFIN
AR
AE
AJ
ADANA
AEMR
AG
ATRN
ADPM
APECO
AGAO
AMED
AX
AM
AL
ADCO
AA
AECL
AADP
ABUD
AMEX
ACAO
ANET
AODE
ASCH
AY
APEC
AID
AORG
ASEAN
AFSI
AFSN
AINF
AGR
AROC
AO
AMBASSADOR
AFFAIRS
ASIG
ABLD
ASUP
AND
ARM
ARF
AQ
ATFN
AC
ACOA
AORL
ADM
AUC
AGMT
ACABQ
ASEX
AFU
ALOW
AZ
APCS
AVERY
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AER
AN
AIT
AMG
AGRICULTURE
AMCHAMS
ACS
BR
BA
BD
BL
BO
BF
BU
BILAT
BEXP
BRUSSELS
BK
BN
BM
BT
BY
BX
BTIO
BIDEN
BG
BE
BP
BBSR
BC
BTIU
BWC
BB
BH
BMGT
CH
CY
CA
CU
CS
CO
CVIS
CPAS
CMGT
CE
COUNTER
CASC
COUNTRY
CJAN
COUNTERTERRORISM
CG
CI
CD
CIDA
CJUS
CDG
CBSA
CEUDA
CR
CM
CLMT
CAC
CBW
CODEL
COPUOS
CWC
CIC
CW
CBE
CHR
CFED
CT
CONS
CIA
CTM
CDC
CVR
CF
CLINTON
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CACS
CAN
CONDOLEEZZA
CB
CSW
CITT
CARSON
CNARC
CACM
CDB
CARICOM
COM
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CV
CKGR
CBC
CL
CICTE
CIS
ECON
EFIN
ELAB
ETRD
EIND
EC
EINV
EAGR
ENRG
ETTC
EAID
EPET
ELTN
EWWT
EAIR
EFIS
EMIN
EG
EU
ER
EUN
EPA
ENVI
EXTERNAL
ECPS
ENGR
ETRC
ECIN
EN
EI
ELN
ET
EINT
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ES
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EZ
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EFTA
EAIG
EK
EUREM
EURN
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EAP
ENIV
ECONOMY
ESA
EINN
ECONOMIC
EIAR
EXBS
ECA
ECUN
EINDETRD
EUR
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
ENERG
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFIM
ENGY
EAIDS
EINVEFIN
EINVETC
EUMEM
ETRA
ETC
ERNG
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EXIM
ERD
EEPET
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IO
IAHRC
ID
IC
IT
IRAQI
IWC
IN
IL
ISLAMISTS
IV
ICAO
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IPR
ICRC
INTERPOL
IQ
IBET
IMO
INR
ITRA
INTERNAL
ICJ
ICTY
IRS
ILO
INRA
INRO
ISRAELI
IEA
INRB
ITALY
ITU
IBRD
IIP
ILC
INTELSAT
IZPREL
IMF
INMARSAT
IRAJ
IDA
ICTR
IA
IGAD
IF
IDP
ITF
ISRAEL
IEFIN
IRC
IACI
KN
KCRM
KOMC
KNNPMNUC
KIPR
KPAL
KWBG
KSCA
KFRD
KNNP
KUNR
KTIP
KWMN
KSTC
KFLU
KOLY
KISL
KPAO
KMDR
KJUS
KSTH
KDEM
KCOR
KIRF
KAWC
KU
KTFN
KWAC
KNPP
KERG
KSEO
KACT
KHLS
KZ
KGHG
KTIA
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KE
KPKO
KCIP
KDRG
KVPR
KV
KIDE
KICC
KPRP
KBIO
KSUM
KGIT
KCFE
KG
KBTS
KFLO
KMPI
KS
KGIC
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KSEP
KTEX
KFSC
KOCI
KHDP
KPLS
KTDB
KHIV
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KMRS
KOM
KSAF
KRVC
KR
KMOC
KNAR
KIRC
KBCT
KSPR
KFIN
KBTR
KJUST
KNEI
KAWK
KGCC
KMCA
KREL
KMFO
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVRP
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KAID
KVIR
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KRAD
KPRV
KCMR
KPWR
KCHG
KIFR
KCFC
KICA
KPIN
KSCI
KESS
KDEV
KTBT
KCRS
KCGC
KOMS
KRIM
KTER
KREC
KPOA
KWWMN
KRGY
KPAK
KWNM
KMIG
KDDG
KRFD
KWMM
KWMNCS
KX
KRCM
KPAONZ
KNUC
KDEMAF
KNUP
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MCAP
MTCRE
MNUC
MIL
MX
MEDIA
MO
MPOS
MU
ML
MA
MP
MY
MERCOSUR
MG
MD
MW
MK
MAS
MEETINGS
MR
MT
MI
MOPPS
MASC
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MTRE
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
MARAD
MASSMNUC
MEPP
MCC
MZ
MILITARY
MDC
MRCRE
MC
MV
MIK
MUCN
NATO
NL
NZ
NPT
NI
NAFTA
NU
NDP
NIPP
NP
NPA
NG
NRR
NO
NSC
NEW
NE
NH
NR
NA
NS
NSF
NZUS
NATIONAL
NSG
NC
NT
NAR
NK
NGO
NV
NSFO
NSSP
NASA
NW
NPG
NORAD
NATOPREL
OTRA
OAS
OPRC
OIIP
OVIP
OREP
OPDC
OEXC
OSCE
OFFICIALS
OMIG
ODIP
OFDP
OECD
OPIC
OBSP
OPCW
OFDA
OTR
OSAC
OSCI
ON
OCII
OES
OVP
OIC
OPAD
OIE
OHUM
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PK
PHUM
PINS
PARM
PA
PTER
PINR
PREF
PHSA
PBTS
PBIO
PO
POL
PE
PARMS
PM
PROG
PL
PAK
POLITICS
PORG
PTBS
PNAT
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PROP
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PAO
PG
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PALESTINIAN
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PSEPC
PREFA
PGOVE
PINF
PHUMPGOV
PNG
PMIL
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
PLN
PSA
PGIV
POLINT
PAS
POGOV
PHUMPREL
PHUMBA
PEL
PGGV
PNR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PRAM
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PF
POV
PROV
PRL
PREO
PAHO
PHUH
PSI
PINL
PU
PRGOV
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
RS
RU
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RO
RW
RCMP
RF
RM
RFE
RSP
RP
RICE
ROBERT
ROOD
RELATIONS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RSO
SU
SNAR
SO
SOCI
SW
SENV
SMIG
SCUL
SP
SZ
SENVKGHG
SR
SY
SA
SYRIA
SF
SI
SC
SWE
SARS
STEINBERG
SN
SG
SIPRS
ST
SEVN
SL
SPCE
SNARIZ
SSA
SNARCS
SYR
SK
SPCVIS
SHUM
SIPDIS
SHI
SH
SOFA
SEN
SNARN
SAARC
SAN
SANC
SCRS
TRGY
TBIO
TU
TF
TERRORISM
TI
TSPL
TPHY
TH
TIP
TSPA
TC
TO
TW
TX
TZ
TNGD
TT
TL
TV
TFIN
TS
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TD
TK
TR
THPY
TP
TAGS
UNGA
UN
UK
US
UNC
UNSC
USUN
UG
UP
UY
USEU
UNESCO
USPS
USTR
UZ
UNHRC
UNO
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNHCR
UNCHR
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
USOAS
UNFICYP
UV
UNEP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDC
UNCHC
UNDP
UNCND
USNC
UNPUOS
UNICEF
UNCSD
UE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05SANJOSE1720, CHORUS OF VOICES SINGING SEND CAFTA-DR TO THE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SANJOSE1720.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 SAN JOSE 001720
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
WHA/CEN
EB FOR WCRAFT
E FOR TSMITHAM
WHA FOR WMIELE
WHA/EPSC FOR KURS
H FOR JHAGAN
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR JYOUNG, CPADILLA, AMALITO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECPS ECON PREL PGOV SOCI CS
SUBJECT: CHORUS OF VOICES SINGING SEND CAFTA-DR TO THE
COSTA RICAN ASSEMBLY
REF: A. (A) SAN JOSE 01713
¶B. (B) SAN JOSE 01636
¶C. (C) SAN JOSE 01455
¶1. (U) Summary. The second day after the U.S. Congress
approved the CAFTA-DR implementing legislation, many Costa
Ricans are expressing the urgent need for President Pacheco
to send the agreement to the Costa Rican Legislative Assembly
for ratification (Ref A). Those asking the administration to
hasten the process include many of the 57-member Assembly,
including its president, Gerardo Gonzalez, at least four
candidates in the upcoming presidential election,
representatives of business, and many members of the
President,s own party, the Social Christian Union Party
(PUSC). Statements from the administration remain consistent
with its previous position; that the President will send
CAFTA-DR for ratification at the time he deems appropriate.
End Summary.
¶2. (U) The amount of media coverage given to the status of
CAFTA-DR in Costa Rica has increased since the U.S. Congress
approved it on July 27, 2005 (local time). This coincides
with a definite growing intensity of the debate about the
status of CAFTA-DR ratification. Local media coverage has
shifted its focus from the vote in the U.S. to the GOCR,s
plan and timetable to ratify CAFTA-DR. The daily La Nacion
not only placed this issue on the front page but
also dedicated its first 8 pages to it. The call for
President Pacheco to send the agreement to the Assembly as
soon as possible was the common theme of many articles.
Those advocating this position, among many others, include,
Gerardo Gonzalez, a PUSC Assembly member (deputy) and
President of the Assembly, Oscar Arias, ex-president of the
country and front-runner in the next presidential election,
and Alberto Trejos, the ex-Minister of Foreign Trade (COMEX).
Of course, there are still those who oppose the agreement
and who have made their opinions known in the media.
--------------------------------------------- ---
THE CHORUS SINGS SEND CAFTA-DR TO THE ASSEMBLY
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶3. (U) On July 28, deputies from the National Liberation
Party (PLN), the Libertarian Movement Party (ML), and the
National Renovation (RN) Party requested the president to
send CAFTA-DR to the Assembly so that the deputies could
start studying it in preparation for the ratification
process. The PLN, in a letter to the President wrote, we
find ourselves in a critical situation where the country
cannot delay a decision on this issue. You cannot continue
to ignore Costa Rican society,s right to debate and decide
its future on an issue this important(. The PLN
representatives specifically stated that they would like
President Pacheco to introduce CAFTA-DR by August 1, 2005.
Rolando Lacle, a PUSC deputy who is President of the
Assembly,s International Relations Commission, recommended
that President Pacheco not delay in this matter because the
country could suffer consequences.
¶4. (U) Gerardo Gonzalez, the PUSC Assembly President,
believes that this issue is so important that he is exploring
Assembly rules and regulations to determine if it is possible
for a deputy to introduce CAFTA-DR to the Assembly if
President Pacheco will not. Gonzalez stated that if it is
permitted, he will present the agreement in September 2005.
(Note: Most political observers and legal scholars agree that
only the President can introduce a treaty for ratification.)
¶5. (U) Five of the top presidential candidates in the next
election, including front-runner Oscar Arias (PLN), Ricardo
Toledo (PUSC), Otto Guevara, (ML), Antonio Alvarez
Desanti(UPC), and Jose Manuel Echandi (UN), also expressed
the need for President Pacheco to take action. Oscar Arias
stated, I call upon the Administration and Assembly to
start discussions of CAFTA-DR as soon as possible. Ricardo
Toledo, the PUSC presidential candidate and a fellow
party-member of President Pacheco, stated that the country is
lagging behind, and he is worried because the necessary
legislation to prepare for CAFTA-DR has not been presented.
¶6. (U) Ex-Minister of COMEX, Alberto Trejos, warns that it
would be devastating for the country to remain outside
CAFTA-DR. When asked what he would recommend to President
Pacheco, he stated that he would recommend that he send the
agreement to the Assembly immediately. The President is the
author of this agreement, he gave instructions on its
negotiation, he authorized the initiation of the
negotiations. He was consulted and gave recommendations; it
was presented to him. We have an excellent agreement because
of this; he played his role.
¶7. (U) Local business leaders are concerned that they may
begin to lose their competitive edge because of the GOCR,s
delay in the CAFTA-DR ratification process. The many
business chambers are looking for ways to increase pressure
on the Administration, the Assembly, and the Commission of
Eminent Persons (Ref B), all of whom are to make decisions
about CAFTA-DR. Jack Liberman, the manager of Costa Rican
Mills, said that there is a lot at stake here and the only
forum in which to discuss this issue democratically is in the
Assembly. Samuel Yankelewitz, president of UCAAEP, an
association of business chambers, and General Manager of the
plastics company Yanber, said that the discussions about
CAFTA-DR will be a long process ) they will last a minimum
of six or 8 months in the Assembly. For this reason, it is
urgent to send the agreement now in order to have an adequate
debate.
¶8. (U) In an official press release, the pro-
CAFTA-DR, Costa Rican-business-backed group, Por Costa Rica,
stated the 13,886 partners of our organization are
convinced that the time has arrived to have a serious and
responsible debate about CAFTA-DR. The Coalition for
Development Initiatives (CINDE) made clear its position
regarding implications of the current situation on foreign
direct investment (FDI): Our relation with the United
States is vital. In 2004 more that seventy percent of total
FDI ($446.3 million or $617.3 million) came from U.S.
sources. Even more, in the last three years 78.9 percent of
new business in Costa Rica originated with investment from
the U.S.
-------------------------------
THE BEAT OF A DIFFERENT DRUMMER
-------------------------------
¶9. (U) Those who oppose even sending CAFTA-DR to the
Assembly continue to voice their opinions. Albino Vargas,
President of the approximately 15,000-member National
Association of Private and Public Employees (ANEP),stated
that if the agreement is sent to the Assembly, it would be
taken as a declaration of war. We will use all of our
available resources, including those that we have never used
before, to defeat CAFTA-DR. Prominent trade union leader
Fabio Chavez was equally emphatic: If CAFTA-DR goes to the
Assembly, there will be a general strike, marches, and civil
disobedience never before seen in this country. Otton
Solis, the presidential candidate for the left leaning
Citizens, Action Party (PAC) still pursues the idea of
renegotiating CAFTA-DR. He said that (this agreement is
not good for Costa Rica and we should renegotiate
bilaterally. It shouldn,t be sent to the Assembly until
after it is renegotiated.
--------------------------
THE ADMINISTRATION,S VOICE
--------------------------
¶10. (U) President Pacheco maintains his lukewarm support
for the agreement by saying that we will move at a slow but
sure pace on CAFTA-DR. He further stated that I will not
decide to approve or reject (CAFTA-DR). I will send it to
the Assembly at the right moment which is my duty as
President. In an interview with La Nacion, Manuel
Gonzalez, the Minister of Foreign Trade (COMEX), admitted
that Costa Rica is the country farthest behind in the
ratification process of CAFTA-DR, but he goes on to say that
what is most important is that those who have to make the
decision to approve or reject CAFTA-DR are the deputies who
need to weigh the consequences of saying yes or no to the
agreement. I, at least, am doing an analysis, and see the
balance much more in favor of yes.
¶11. (U) When asked if he had spoken with the President about
this issue since the U.S. House of Representatives, vote,
Gonzalez stated that he had, and that the President,s
position is that the approval in the U.S. was expected and is
a positive and important step. Minister Gonzales further
stated that my objective is to present CAFTA-DR to the
Assembly, let them discuss it and approve it. When asked
if this was also the Government,s objective, Minister
Gonzalez reportedly laughed and said, I believe that it is,
and it continues to be an aspiration of the Executive branch.
It is the goal that I have always shared with the President,
and I have never received any indication otherwise, nor have
I received any instruction to work in another direction(.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶12. (SBU) The U.S. House of Representative,s vote approving
the CAFTA-DR implementing legislation was heard loud and
clear by those who support CAFTA-DR and those who do not.
The tone of the discussions about the status in Costa Rica
has definitely sharpened. The strength of voices of those in
favor of sending CAFTA-DR to the Costa Rican Assembly is
growing, with support from Assembly members, business people,
and presidential candidates. The Administration of President
Pacheco is maintaining its go-slow approach, still fearful of
the threats from CAFTA-DR opponents.
KAPLAN