

Currently released so far... 12453 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
ASEC
AORC
AMGT
APER
AU
AF
AS
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
AFIN
AR
AE
AJ
ADANA
AEMR
AG
ATRN
ADPM
APECO
AGAO
AMED
AX
AM
AL
ADCO
AA
AECL
AADP
ABUD
AMEX
ACAO
ANET
AODE
ASCH
AY
APEC
AID
AORG
ASEAN
AFSI
AFSN
AINF
AGR
AROC
AO
AMBASSADOR
AFFAIRS
ASIG
ABLD
ASUP
AND
ARM
ARF
AQ
ATFN
AC
ACOA
AORL
ADM
AUC
AGMT
ACABQ
ASEX
AFU
ALOW
AZ
APCS
AVERY
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AER
AN
AIT
AMG
AGRICULTURE
AMCHAMS
ACS
BR
BA
BD
BL
BO
BF
BU
BILAT
BEXP
BRUSSELS
BK
BN
BM
BT
BY
BX
BTIO
BIDEN
BG
BE
BP
BBSR
BC
BTIU
BWC
BB
BH
BMGT
CH
CY
CA
CU
CS
CO
CVIS
CPAS
CMGT
CE
COUNTER
CASC
COUNTRY
CJAN
COUNTERTERRORISM
CG
CI
CD
CIDA
CJUS
CDG
CBSA
CEUDA
CR
CM
CLMT
CAC
CBW
CODEL
COPUOS
CWC
CIC
CW
CBE
CHR
CFED
CT
CONS
CIA
CTM
CDC
CVR
CF
CLINTON
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CACS
CAN
CONDOLEEZZA
CB
CSW
CITT
CARSON
CNARC
CACM
CDB
CARICOM
COM
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CV
CKGR
CBC
CL
CICTE
CIS
ECON
EFIN
ELAB
ETRD
EIND
EC
EINV
EAGR
ENRG
ETTC
EAID
EPET
ELTN
EWWT
EAIR
EFIS
EMIN
EG
EU
ER
EUN
EPA
ENVI
EXTERNAL
ECPS
ENGR
ETRC
ECIN
EN
EI
ELN
ET
EINT
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ES
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EZ
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EFTA
EAIG
EK
EUREM
EURN
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ENVR
ELECTIONS
EAP
ENIV
ECONOMY
ESA
EINN
ECONOMIC
EIAR
EXBS
ECA
ECUN
EINDETRD
EUR
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
ENERG
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFIM
ENGY
EAIDS
EINVEFIN
EINVETC
EUMEM
ETRA
ETC
ERNG
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EXIM
ERD
EEPET
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IO
IAHRC
ID
IC
IT
IRAQI
IWC
IN
IL
ISLAMISTS
IV
ICAO
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IPR
ICRC
INTERPOL
IQ
IBET
IMO
INR
ITRA
INTERNAL
ICJ
ICTY
IRS
ILO
INRA
INRO
ISRAELI
IEA
INRB
ITALY
ITU
IBRD
IIP
ILC
INTELSAT
IZPREL
IMF
INMARSAT
IRAJ
IDA
ICTR
IA
IGAD
IF
IDP
ITF
ISRAEL
IEFIN
IRC
IACI
KN
KCRM
KOMC
KNNPMNUC
KIPR
KPAL
KWBG
KSCA
KFRD
KNNP
KUNR
KTIP
KWMN
KSTC
KFLU
KOLY
KISL
KPAO
KMDR
KJUS
KSTH
KDEM
KCOR
KIRF
KAWC
KU
KTFN
KWAC
KNPP
KERG
KSEO
KACT
KHLS
KZ
KGHG
KTIA
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCRCM
KE
KPKO
KCIP
KDRG
KVPR
KV
KIDE
KICC
KPRP
KBIO
KSUM
KGIT
KCFE
KG
KBTS
KFLO
KMPI
KS
KGIC
KPAI
KHSA
KTLA
KSEP
KTEX
KFSC
KOCI
KHDP
KPLS
KTDB
KHIV
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KMRS
KOM
KSAF
KRVC
KR
KMOC
KNAR
KIRC
KBCT
KSPR
KFIN
KBTR
KJUST
KNEI
KAWK
KGCC
KMCA
KREL
KMFO
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVRP
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KAID
KVIR
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KRAD
KPRV
KCMR
KPWR
KCHG
KIFR
KCFC
KICA
KPIN
KSCI
KESS
KDEV
KTBT
KCRS
KCGC
KOMS
KRIM
KTER
KREC
KPOA
KWWMN
KRGY
KPAK
KWNM
KMIG
KDDG
KRFD
KWMM
KWMNCS
KX
KRCM
KPAONZ
KNUC
KDEMAF
KNUP
MARR
MOPS
MASS
MCAP
MTCRE
MNUC
MIL
MX
MEDIA
MO
MPOS
MU
ML
MA
MP
MY
MERCOSUR
MG
MD
MW
MK
MAS
MEETINGS
MR
MT
MI
MOPPS
MASC
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MTRE
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
MARAD
MASSMNUC
MEPP
MCC
MZ
MILITARY
MDC
MRCRE
MC
MV
MIK
MUCN
NATO
NL
NZ
NPT
NI
NAFTA
NU
NDP
NIPP
NP
NPA
NG
NRR
NO
NSC
NEW
NE
NH
NR
NA
NS
NSF
NZUS
NATIONAL
NSG
NC
NT
NAR
NK
NGO
NV
NSFO
NSSP
NASA
NW
NPG
NORAD
NATOPREL
OTRA
OAS
OPRC
OIIP
OVIP
OREP
OPDC
OEXC
OSCE
OFFICIALS
OMIG
ODIP
OFDP
OECD
OPIC
OBSP
OPCW
OFDA
OTR
OSAC
OSCI
ON
OCII
OES
OVP
OIC
OPAD
OIE
OHUM
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PK
PHUM
PINS
PARM
PA
PTER
PINR
PREF
PHSA
PBTS
PBIO
PO
POL
PE
PARMS
PM
PROG
PL
PAK
POLITICS
PORG
PTBS
PNAT
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PROP
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PAO
PG
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PALESTINIAN
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PSEPC
PREFA
PGOVE
PINF
PHUMPGOV
PNG
PMIL
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
PLN
PSA
PGIV
POLINT
PAS
POGOV
PHUMPREL
PHUMBA
PEL
PGGV
PNR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PRAM
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PF
POV
PROV
PRL
PREO
PAHO
PHUH
PSI
PINL
PU
PRGOV
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
RS
RU
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RO
RW
RCMP
RF
RM
RFE
RSP
RP
RICE
ROBERT
ROOD
RELATIONS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RSO
SU
SNAR
SO
SOCI
SW
SENV
SMIG
SCUL
SP
SZ
SENVKGHG
SR
SY
SA
SYRIA
SF
SI
SC
SWE
SARS
STEINBERG
SN
SG
SIPRS
ST
SEVN
SL
SPCE
SNARIZ
SSA
SNARCS
SYR
SK
SPCVIS
SHUM
SIPDIS
SHI
SH
SOFA
SEN
SNARN
SAARC
SAN
SANC
SCRS
TRGY
TBIO
TU
TF
TERRORISM
TI
TSPL
TPHY
TH
TIP
TSPA
TC
TO
TW
TX
TZ
TNGD
TT
TL
TV
TFIN
TS
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TD
TK
TR
THPY
TP
TAGS
UNGA
UN
UK
US
UNC
UNSC
USUN
UG
UP
UY
USEU
UNESCO
USPS
USTR
UZ
UNHRC
UNO
UNMIK
UNAUS
UNHCR
UNCHR
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
USOAS
UNFICYP
UV
UNEP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDC
UNCHC
UNDP
UNCND
USNC
UNPUOS
UNICEF
UNCSD
UE
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 10QUITO103, Ecuador Rejects FATF Decision to Place it on High-Risk List
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10QUITO103.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
10QUITO103 | 2010-02-25 23:11 | 2011-04-13 17:05 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Quito |
Appears in these articles: http://www.eluniverso.com/2011/04/12/1/1355/cable-250884.html |
VZCZCXYZ0025
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHQT #0103/01 0562307
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 252307Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1134
INFO RHEFHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHEHNSC/WHITE HOUSE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUCNFB/FBI WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEABND/DEA HQS WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEANQT/FINCEN VIENNA VA IMMEDIATE
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA IMMEDIATE
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA IMMEDIATE
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES IMMEDIATE
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS IMMEDIATE 0035
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL IMMEDIATE
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ FEB MEXICO IMMEDIATE
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 0009
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN IMMEDIATE 0001
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME IMMEDIATE 0053
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO
C O N F I D E N T I A L QUITO 000103
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/02/25
TAGS: ECON EFIN PREL PGOV KJUS KCRM KTFN PTER SNAR EC
SUBJECT: Ecuador Rejects FATF Decision to Place it on High-Risk List
REF: QUITO 101
CLASSIFIED BY: ...
id: 250884
date: 2/25/2010 23:07
refid: 10QUITO103
origin: Embassy Quito
classification: CONFIDENTIAL
destination: 10QUITO101
header:
VZCZCXYZ0025
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHQT #0103/01 0562307
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 252307Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1134
INFO RHEFHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHEHNSC/WHITE HOUSE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUCNFB/FBI WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEABND/DEA HQS WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEANQT/FINCEN VIENNA VA IMMEDIATE
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA IMMEDIATE
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA IMMEDIATE
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES IMMEDIATE
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS IMMEDIATE 0035
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL IMMEDIATE
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ FEB MEXICO IMMEDIATE
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 0009
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN IMMEDIATE 0001
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME IMMEDIATE 0053
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO
----------------- header ends ----------------
C O N F I D E N T I A L QUITO 000103
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/02/25
TAGS: ECON EFIN PREL PGOV KJUS KCRM KTFN PTER SNAR EC
SUBJECT: Ecuador Rejects FATF Decision to Place it on High-Risk List
REF: QUITO 101
CLASSIFIED BY: Christopher A. Landberg, Economic Counselor, U.S.
Department of State, Economic Section; REASON: 1.4(B), (D)
Summary
¶1. (C) The Ecuadorian government has reacted vehemently against the
February 18 Financial Action Task Force (FATF) statement that
Ecuador has not committed sufficiently to addressing strategic
deficiencies in its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism
finance regime. President Correa and senior GoE officials
characterized the FATF decision as unjust, argued it ignores
Ecuador's counter narcotics achievements, and alleged it is
punishment for Ecuador's ties with Iran. On February 25, Foreign
Minister Patino questioned the legitimacy of FATF and said that
Ecuador will not ask FATF to reconsider the decision. In contrast,
Central Bank officials and private sector leaders are concerned
about possible repercussions and want to play a constructive role
in getting Ecuador off the FATF high-risk list. Based on the
initial reaction and the Rio Group's recent declaration of
solidarity with Ecuador, it appears that the GoE aims to push FATF
to reconsider the decision, while building support within the
region. End Summary.
FATF Groups Ecuador with North Korea, Ethiopia, Angola
¶2. (SBU) The FATF plenary announced on February 18 that Ecuador
(along with Angola, Ethiopia, and North Korea) had not "committed
to an action plan developed with the FATF to address key
deficiencies" in its anti-money laundering and combating the
financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime and had not "delivered a
clear high-level political commitment to address these
deficiencies" going forward, thus posing a risk to the
international financial system. It called on Ecuador to work with
the FATF and FATF-Style Regional Body GAFISUD in adequately
criminalizing money laundering and terrorism finance and addressing
other deficiencies. FATF did acknowledge that Ecuador has engaged
with FATF and GAFISUD (unlike the other three countries cited).
Correa Rejects FATF Determination
¶3. (SBU) President Correa spent much of his weekly address on
Saturday, February 20, denouncing FATF's statement. He framed the
FATF decision as an attack on Ecuador's sovereignty. While not
directly naming the United States, Correa referred to the FATF
"blacklisting" as a sign of the "arrogance of imperialism." Correa
declared that the FATF decision "has to do with the fact the
Ecuador has relations with Iran," an assertion he repeated several
times during the address.
¶4. (SBU) In a preview of what has become the GoE's party line,
Correa said that contrary to FATF's findings Ecuador has achieved
extraordinary results in combating drug trafficking (Ecuador
doubled narcotics seizures in 2009, compared to 2008). He also
stated that there was no money laundering in Ecuador, adding that
"[the imperialists] need to check where the money laundering is: in
the United States and Switzerland, but instead of checking their
own countries they condemn us."
¶5. (SBU) Correa's efforts to protest the FATF decision at the
February 23 Rio Group Summit in Cancun, Mexico, resulted in the
group releasing a public declaration of solidarity with Ecuador.
The Rio Group declaration expressed the "deep concern" of its 29
member states (including FATF members Brazil, Argentina, and
Mexico) over FATF's statement on Ecuador and decision process. The
Rio Group declaration also reinforced the GoE's party line, noting
that President Correa "totally rejected the actions of FATF," which
are "not consistent with the evident efforts and initiatives in all
areas that Ecuador has carried out to fight money laundering and
the financing of terrorist activities."
Senior Officials Follow Correa's Lead
¶6. (SBU) Coordinating Minister for Economic Policy (and Acting
Central Bank President) Diego Borja stated February 19 that FATF is
"not official, nor does it represent the members of the G-20."
Minister of Government Gustavo Jalkh, who oversees Ecuador's police
forces, publicly labeled the FATF move an "injustice" and explained
that Ecuador was a model country in the region in terms of fighting
organized crime, narcotics trafficking, and money laundering.
Jalkh stated that "terrorism" was considered an "illicit activity"
under the Penal Code, and Ecuador's money laundering legislation
addressed all illicit activities (i.e., including terrorism). Both
officials, as well as Foreign Minister Patino, also repeated
Correa's allegation that the real reason for the FATF determination
was to retaliate against Ecuador for developing a close
relationship with Iran.
¶7. (C) Finance Minister Maria Viteri forcefully rejected FATF's
designation of Ecuador as high-risk during a February 24 meeting
with EconCouns and Treasury's visiting Ecuador desk officer.
Viteri said the FATF assessment was out of date because it was
based on a 2007 GAFISUD review, did not reflect Ecuador's positive
record in prosecuting AML/CFT cases, and did not recognize
Ecuador's previous efforts in building its AML/CFT regime.
Regarding the latter, she noted that the ongoing process of passing
laws required under the new constitution had overtaken further
review of AML/CFT regulations. (Comment: Viteri's claim that
Ecuador's FATF listing was based on a 2007 report is misinformed.
Ecuador's FATF listing is the result of a 2009 review conducted by
a FATF working group staffed by officials from member countries.
The working group measured progress in Ecuador's AML/CFT regime
since 2007, and used a Mutual Review (MER) of Ecuador's AML/CFT
regime conducted by GAFISUD in 2007 as a baseline for assessing
Ecuador's progress. End Comment.)
¶8. (C) Viteri expressed concern that the FATF report had political
aims and undermined the positive international image the Correa
Administration has sought for Ecuador. She characterized as
incredulous the report's inclusion of Ecuador -- itself a "victim
of terrorism" in its northern border region -- as being soft on
terrorism. Viteri also openly questioned the efficacy of promoting
AML/CFT laws, when many countries do not enforce them.
Nevertheless, she recognized that more work may be needed to
improve Ecuador's AML/CFT regime, and noted that Foreign Minister
Patino and Solicitor General Diego Garcia Carrion will lead the
GoE's official response to FATF. EconCouns highlighted that the
FATF determination had been supported by all member countries and
encouraged the GoE to work with FATF and GAFISUD to address the
deficiency areas highlighted in the statement.
¶9. (SBU) Ecuador's National Counsel on Money Laundering (NCML), an
inter-ministerial body in charge of Ecuadoran AML/CFT policies and
headed by Solicitor General Garcia, announced it would send letters
to FATF and GAFISUD objecting to the listing. Garcia, who has been
personally engaged in GoE exchanges with FATF, has made the most
moderate comments of all GoE officials. In both his public
comments and his statements in the diplomatic note sent February 19
to the Treasury Department and all other FATF member countries, in
which he protested the FATF decision, Garcia highlighted the GoE's
commitment to complying with FATF AML/CFT recommendations and
expressly avoided linking the FATF determination to Iran. In
contrast, Foreign Minister Patino seems to be hardening his
position. He stated February 25 that the GoE "will not ask that it
[FATF] reconsider anything, since that organization does not have
the right or the authority to put Ecuador, or any other country, on
lists of any sort." He added that the 29 members of the Rio Group
had supported Ecuador's position in this matter.
Regulators and Private Sector Eschew Politics and Focus on Solving
the Problem
¶10. (C) During separate February 24 meetings with EconCouns and
TreasOff, Central Bank General Manager Christian Ruiz and private
bank association President Fernando Pozo (also General Manager of
Ecuador's largest bank, Banco Pichincha) expressed deep concerns
about the FATF characterization of Ecuador. Both highlighted the
strict controls that Ecuadorian banks have in place, arguing that
these measures met or exceeded international standards. They
worried that the determination could make it more difficult and
costly for the GoE and the private sector to access international
capital markets. Both admitted that neither institution had been
included in the GoE's past discussions with FATF and GAFISUD, and
asked for Embassy guidance on how to engage.
¶11. (C) Members of Ecuador's four American Chambers (Quito, Cuenca,
Ambato, Guayaquil) noted similar concerns during a February 24
meeting with the Ambassador and Embassy staff, and noted their
interest in supporting efforts to remove Ecuador from the current
FATF grouping. Emboffs' consistent response to all these parties
was that Ecuador needed to work with FATF and GAFISUD (and not via
individual FATF members). Emboffs also recommended they focus on
FATF's statement, which highlights the lack of political will on
Ecuador's part, implying that these institutions could play a
useful role in encouraging GoE officials to develop a more
constructive and proactive response to FATF/GAFISUD.
¶12. (C) During a February 23 meeting, Wells Fargo/Wachovia
representatives told Emboffs that they will increase scrutiny of
their clients in Ecuador, which will result in higher costs.
(Wachovia, soon to complete the full transfer to Wells Fargo, is
the largest player in cash management services in Ecuador and one
of the largest in providing trade financing). They agreed with
Central Bank/Pichincha statements that Ecuadorian banks are
committed to meeting international AML/CFT standards, and commented
that they are not as worried about the local banks as they are
about how U.S. regulatory agencies will react. They have called on
their local clients to strengthen controls and for the time being
do not have plans to reduce exposure to the market. However,
decisions going forward depend on U.S. regulators' actions and, if
costs increase significantly, reducing the size of their Ecuador
portfolio is an option (as Wachovia has done in Venezuela).
Comment
¶13. (C) Correa and his ministers' statements, combined with
Correa's successful lobbying efforts at the Rio Group Summit,
indicate that the GoE does not intend to accept the FATF judgment
without a fight. However, given that Ecuador has limited ability
to influence FATF positions, the real result of the GoE's
government wide outburst is to paint Correa into a corner. Seeing
as the President has termed the FATF statement as an attack on
Ecuador's sovereignty, and especially in light of Foreign Minister
Patino's latest hardening of Ecuador's public position, Correa
would lose face if he were now to reverse course and make a clear
political commitment to a FATF-action plan. Nevertheless, the
interest of the Central Bank and private sector actors to pursue a
more constructive path could gradually bear fruit. The question is
whether these interested parties can help the GoE move past its
initial rejection of the determination and work with FATF to
address problem areas. The FATF decision is one of the few
instances where the GoE has experienced adverse consequences as a
result of its actions (or inactions).
HODGES
=======================CABLE ENDS============================