

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AF
AE
AR
AORC
AJ
AU
AM
ABLD
AL
AMGT
ASUP
AFIN
APER
ABUD
AVERY
APCS
AEMR
ADCO
APECO
ASIG
AG
AA
AS
AFFAIRS
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AMED
AO
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ATRN
AID
AC
AGMT
CH
CO
CS
CE
CU
CLINTON
CG
CVIS
CMGT
CI
CJAN
CF
COM
CASC
CA
CBW
CM
CDG
CR
COUNTER
CD
CWC
CKGR
CN
CPAS
CJUS
CV
CONS
CT
CY
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
ECON
EFIN
EAIR
EUN
EINV
ENRG
EG
ETRD
EPET
ETTC
ELAB
EU
ER
ET
EAGR
ECPS
ECIN
ELTN
EAID
EMIN
EWWT
EFIS
EIND
EC
ES
EN
EI
ENVR
ENGR
ENIV
EUNCH
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELN
EZ
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EINT
EUR
ECINECONCS
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EK
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IN
IC
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
IT
ICTY
IO
IA
IWC
ID
ICRC
ILC
INTELSAT
IMO
ISRAELI
IACI
ILO
ITRA
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
ICAO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
INTERPOL
IV
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KDEM
KCRM
KJUS
KTIA
KWBG
KPAL
KIPR
KTIP
KE
KNNP
KGHG
KICC
KV
KTFN
KU
KCFE
KDRG
KWMN
KSCA
KGIC
KCOR
KFRD
KPKO
KSUM
KPRP
KPAO
KBCT
KIRF
KCFC
KISL
KREC
KSPR
KHIV
KBIO
KMCA
KMPI
KFLU
KSTH
KBTR
KS
KOMC
KOMS
KSEP
KPRV
KFLO
KHLS
KN
KWWMN
KUNR
KLIG
KSTC
KZ
KG
KRAD
KOLY
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KAWK
KCIP
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KIDE
KSAF
KX
KWMNCS
KNEI
KCRS
KVPR
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KACT
KO
KFSC
KR
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MO
MX
MCAP
ML
MTCRE
MR
MP
MY
MU
MIL
MAR
MC
MRCRE
MTRE
MA
MEPI
MV
MPOS
MD
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OREP
OVIP
OFDP
ODIP
OPDC
OAS
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPRC
OVP
OSCI
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PREF
PTER
PARM
PBTS
PINR
PINS
PHSA
PK
POL
PM
PINT
PE
PINF
PEL
PA
PARMS
PO
PLN
PROP
PALESTINIAN
PAO
PL
POV
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
SENV
SY
SZ
SOCI
SO
SR
SNAR
SA
SP
SW
SMIG
SU
SCUL
SC
SAN
SN
SL
SG
SYR
SEVN
SF
SI
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TRGY
TU
TBIO
TH
TS
TSPL
TT
TPHY
TSPA
TI
TK
TIP
TERRORISM
TZ
TX
TW
TD
TP
TC
TO
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TURKEY
UK
UNGA
UN
UNHRC
UNMIK
UNO
UZ
UNSC
UP
UG
UNHCR
UNDC
US
UNAUS
USTR
UV
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UAE
USEU
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SANJOSE5, ANOTHER CAFTA REFERENDUM GAMBIT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SANJOSE5.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08SANJOSE5 | 2008-01-03 22:10 | 2011-03-02 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
Appears in these articles: http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-02/Investigacion.aspx |
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0005/01 0032212
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 032212Z JAN 08
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9317
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHDG/AMEMBASSY SANTO DOMINGO PRIORITY 1575
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000005
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA, WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC AND EEB; PASS TO
USTR:AMALITO, DOLIVER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CS ETRD PGOV PINR PREL SENV
SUBJECT: ANOTHER CAFTA REFERENDUM GAMBIT
REF: A. A) 2007 SAN JOSE 2070 AND PREVIOUS
¶B. B) SAN JOSE-WHA/CEN EMAIL OF 12/31/07
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: The Supreme Election Tribunal (TSE)
accepted a petition to collect signatures for another
CAFTA-related referendum, this one to ratify the UPOV (Union
for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants) Convention and
to approve related legislation. The Convention and
legislation must be approved as part of the GOCR,s overall
CAFTA implementation package. GOCR officials criticized the
move as a politically-motivated delaying tactic, and
reiterated the GOCR,s commitment to complete the full slate
of implementing legislation by the March 1 EIF deadline. The
three environmental NGOs which filed the petition plan to
collect the required 133,545 signatures as quickly as
possible, but their efforts may be moot. The TSE also
announced that the next referendum cannot be convoked before
July 7, 2008, which should give the GOCR more than enough
time to complete the implementing legislation before then.
Broader anti-CAFTA groups see the UPOV referendum as one more
way to kill CAFTA, and the opposition PAC party may use the
TSE ruling to justify further delaying tactics. With
SIPDIS
sufficient discipline and focus in the legislature, the UPOV
maneuver should not be more than a distraction for the GOCR.
However, even without a new referendum, the legislature
returns to work today facing considerable challenges to
completing its CAFTA-related work on time. END SUMMARY.
====================================
ANOTHER YEAR, ANOTHER REFERENDUM?
====================================
¶2. (U) On December 28, the TSE announced that it had
accepted a petition filed by three local environmental NGOs
to collect signatures for another CAFTA referendum, this one
to ratify the UPOV (Union for the Protection of New Varieties
of Plants) Convention and to approve related implementing
legislation. (The TSE actually ruled on December 21, but the
story did not surface for one week.) The UPOV Convention and
related legislation must be approved as part of the GOCR,s
overall CAFTA implementation package.
¶3. (U) The few GOCR officials available for comment during
the year-end holidays were critical. Legislature President
Francisco Pacheco told the media that the move was clearly a
"delaying tactic designed to derail" CAFTA implementation,
and a "discredit" to the October 7 overall CAFTA referendum.
Vacationing in Guanacaste, Minister of the Presidency Rodrigo
Arias told reporters the move was an "abuse" of the electoral
system, adding that the UPOV issue was too technical to be
dealt with in a referendum.
¶4. (U) Both Pacheco and Arias reiterated the GOCR,s
commitment to complete the full slate of implementing
legislation, including the two UPOV-related items, by the
March 1 EIF deadline and certainly before sufficient
signatures are collected to launch a referendum. Arias
expressed hope that the GOCR would complete the legislation
"in January or the first two weeks of February," a slip from
the GOCR,s previous (and publicly-stated) internal deadline
of 15 January.
=============================
NGOs ANXIOUS TO GET GOING . . .
=============================
¶5. (U) The NGOs which filed the referendum petition in
November, led by the Costa Rican Federation for Environmental
Conservation (FECON in Spanish), welcomed the TSE ruling.
The text was posted on their websites and blogs long before
the TSE released it officially. The NGOs have vowed to
collect the required signatures as rapidly as possible. The
Referendum Law allows up to nine months to do so, and at
least 5 percent of the national voter registry, or 133,545,
must be collected and validated before a referendum could be
held. (Referenda may be held by collection of signatures, by
legislative action, or by a combination of executive and
legislative action. The latter mechanism was used to convoke
the October 2007 CAFTA plebiscite.)
¶6. (U) The NGO leaders (including Fabian Pacheco, son of the
former president) hope to mobilize the grassroots "patriotic
committees" which were active in the campaign to say "no" to
CAFTA in October. All three NGOs oppose UPOV on substantive
grounds, largely out of concern that ratifying and
implementing that Convention would "flood" Costa Rica with
genetically-modified agricultural materials.
¶7. (SBU) However, the broader anti-CAFTA groups (based on
their web postings) see the UPOV referendum as one more way
to kill CAFTA. Signaling a possible opposition tactic in the
legislature, PAC deputy faction head Madrigal has already
publicly praised the TSE decision as another indication of
the "deepening of democracy" in Costa Rica. The PAC website,
meanwhile, has regularly warned of the (genetic engineering
and other) "danger" that might flow from hasty ratification
of UPOV. The PAC-led opposition therefore may try to block
action on the two UPOV-related items, using the call for a
new referendum as further justification to criticize the
Arias administration and a &legitimate8 way to delay
implementation further.
============================================= =
. . . BUT IMPACT ON IMPLEMENTATION MAY BE LIGHT
============================================= =
¶8. (U) The UPOV referendum maneuver may not have the impact
sought by the petitioners (or the anti-CAFTA forces). TSE
President Luis Antonio Sobrado and Magistrate Max Esquivel
have been quick to stress that the collection of signatures
for a referendum does not impede the regular legislative
process; both may proceed in parallel. (According to the
Referendum Law, the legislative process can only be stopped
when the TSE actually convokes a referendum on the
legislation in question; the TSE reiterated this in its
December 21 decision.)
¶9. (SBU) Going further, Sobrado emphasized that the UPOV
referendum could not be convoked before July 7, 2008 or take
place before October 7, 2008, i.e., one year from the dates
the CAFTA referendum was convoked and held. (In other words,
the TSE is interpreting the Referendum Law, which says only
that one referendum can be held each year, to mean there must
be one year between referenda.) Under this reasoning, no
matter how quickly the signatures were collected, the UPOV
referendum could not be convoked before July, which would
allow the GOCR ample time to complete all the implementing
agenda, even if an EIF extension were requested, before any
new referendum becomes relevant.
============================================= ====
COMMENT: CHALLENGES ENOUGH EVEN WITHOUT UPOV
============================================= ====
¶10. (SBU) We view another CAFTA-related referendum in Costa
Rica in 2008 as unlikely, but not totally impossible. With
sufficient discipline and focus in the legislature -- the
same ingredients that have been needed since the beginning of
the CAFTA debate -- the GOCR should be able to withstand the
combination of probable PAC opposition and likely NGO
pressure to hold back the UPOV legislation for approval by
referendum. This latest development should light a fire
under the Asamblea, which ended 2007 sick and tired of
dealing with CAFTA. For that matter, the Costa Rican public
also ended the year under the assumption that their role in
ratifying/approving CAFTA had been completed. It may be
difficult, therefore, for the opposition to drag CAFTA out
for nine more months, but this doesn,t rule out their
trying. And, although we believe the NGOs pressed for the
new referendum out of genuine (if misplaced) concerns about
UPOV, we can easily foresee domestic and international
anti-globalists and anti-free traders jumping on this
bandwagon to further their broader agenda.
¶11. (SBU) The legislature returns to work today facing
challenges enough, even without the UPOV referendum maneuver.
Eight items of implementing legislation are pending plenario
action (a drop of one from our previous tally, Ref A), a 9th
is in committee and a 10th has not been introduced. Most/all
of these will likely face review by the constitutional court.
Among these items are the most politically controversial,
including UPOV, IPR, and telecom and insurance sector reform.
PLN faction chief Mayi Antillon and the legislature
leadership has called for a return to the grueling 6 to 7
days a week, three session per day pre-recess schedule, but
the Asamblea may be reluctant to resume that pace quickly (if
at all). We will have a better sense of the GOCR,s and
G38,s thinking for the new year once the major players have
reported back to work. Minister Arias,s comments while on
vacation suggest that political and procedural realities may
be slowing the GOCR,s ambitious legislative timetable.
BRENNAN