

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AF
AE
AR
AORC
AJ
AU
AM
ABLD
AL
AMGT
ASUP
AFIN
APER
ABUD
AVERY
APCS
AEMR
ADCO
APECO
ASIG
AG
AA
AS
AFFAIRS
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AMED
AO
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ATRN
AID
AC
AGMT
CH
CO
CS
CE
CU
CLINTON
CG
CVIS
CMGT
CI
CJAN
CF
COM
CASC
CA
CBW
CM
CDG
CR
COUNTER
CD
CWC
CKGR
CN
CPAS
CJUS
CV
CONS
CT
CY
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
ECON
EFIN
EAIR
EUN
EINV
ENRG
EG
ETRD
EPET
ETTC
ELAB
EU
ER
ET
EAGR
ECPS
ECIN
ELTN
EAID
EMIN
EWWT
EFIS
EIND
EC
ES
EN
EI
ENVR
ENGR
ENIV
EUNCH
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELN
EZ
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EINT
EUR
ECINECONCS
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EK
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IN
IC
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
IT
ICTY
IO
IA
IWC
ID
ICRC
ILC
INTELSAT
IMO
ISRAELI
IACI
ILO
ITRA
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
ICAO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
INTERPOL
IV
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KDEM
KCRM
KJUS
KTIA
KWBG
KPAL
KIPR
KTIP
KE
KNNP
KGHG
KICC
KV
KTFN
KU
KCFE
KDRG
KWMN
KSCA
KGIC
KCOR
KFRD
KPKO
KSUM
KPRP
KPAO
KBCT
KIRF
KCFC
KISL
KREC
KSPR
KHIV
KBIO
KMCA
KMPI
KFLU
KSTH
KBTR
KS
KOMC
KOMS
KSEP
KPRV
KFLO
KHLS
KN
KWWMN
KUNR
KLIG
KSTC
KZ
KG
KRAD
KOLY
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KAWK
KCIP
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KIDE
KSAF
KX
KWMNCS
KNEI
KCRS
KVPR
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KACT
KO
KFSC
KR
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MO
MX
MCAP
ML
MTCRE
MR
MP
MY
MU
MIL
MAR
MC
MRCRE
MTRE
MA
MEPI
MV
MPOS
MD
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OREP
OVIP
OFDP
ODIP
OPDC
OAS
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPRC
OVP
OSCI
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PREF
PTER
PARM
PBTS
PINR
PINS
PHSA
PK
POL
PM
PINT
PE
PINF
PEL
PA
PARMS
PO
PLN
PROP
PALESTINIAN
PAO
PL
POV
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
SENV
SY
SZ
SOCI
SO
SR
SNAR
SA
SP
SW
SMIG
SU
SCUL
SC
SAN
SN
SL
SG
SYR
SEVN
SF
SI
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TRGY
TU
TBIO
TH
TS
TSPL
TT
TPHY
TSPA
TI
TK
TIP
TERRORISM
TZ
TX
TW
TD
TP
TC
TO
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TURKEY
UK
UNGA
UN
UNHRC
UNMIK
UNO
UZ
UNSC
UP
UG
UNHCR
UNDC
US
UNAUS
USTR
UV
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UAE
USEU
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE137, 2008 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - COSTA RICA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE137.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE137 | 2009-03-04 12:12 | 2011-03-18 21:09 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
Appears in these articles: http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-18/Investigacion/NotasSecundarias/Investigacion2716690.aspx http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-18/Investigacion/NotasSecundarias/Investigacion2716698.aspx |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0137/01 0631259
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 041259Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0542
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000137
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
EEB/TPP/IPE FOR TMCGOWAN AND SKEAT
PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR JGROVES AND GVETERE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON KIPR CS
SUBJECT: 2008 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - COSTA RICA
REF: A) 09 STATE 8410
B) 06 SAN JOSE 0464
C) 07 SAN JOSE 0335
D) 08 SAN JOSE 0155
E) 08 SAN JOSE 0959
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (U) Since last year's report (Ref D), the GOCR enacted a number
of laws related to Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) as required by
the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR), but the
success in passing new IPR legislation highlighted the country's
failure to enforce existing laws. Costa Rica's Attorney General
publicly and repeatedly stated that Costa Rica should use its
limited investigative and prosecutorial resources to pursue violent
and drug-related crimes and instructed staff prosecutors to pursue
IPR cases only if they implied harm to people or the environment.
¶2. (U) Nonetheless, there was IPR progress. The Costa Rican
Industrial Registry issued many more patents than in recent years.
A number of Costa Rican officials received training in IPR
enforcement, administration, prosecution, and customs from USPTO,
DHS, WIPO, and others. The Judicial Branch, through the Judicial
School, has engaged in IPR training and wants to provide more
training opportunities for judges and prosecutors. Due to the
CAFTA-DR-related legislative gains (which required significant
political will by the executive branch), and improvements with
registrations, Post recommends that Costa Rica's ranking not be
lowered, and that the country remain on the Watch List for the 2009
Special 301 Report (Ref A). END SUMMARY.
----------------------------
IPR BACKGROUND IN COSTA RICA
----------------------------
¶3. (U) After a difficult and extended implementation review
process, CAFTA-DR entered into force (EIF) for Costa Rica on January
1, 2009. However, entry into force did not quiet CAFTA and IPR
critics. Issues related to IPR rose to the forefront of public
debate during the campaign leading up to the October 7, 2007
nationwide referendum to ratify the country's participation in
CAFTA-DR. Those opposed routinely spoke out against the Agreement's
requirements to create effective deterrents against IPR infringement
as well as protections for IPR, politicizing the issues. Opposition
leaders asserted that increased penalties for IPR violators would
"send students to jail for copying textbooks" and increased IPR
protection would bankrupt the local social security system since it
would be forced to purchase original, innovative pharmaceuticals
rather than generics. The Costa Rican public ultimately rejected
such arguments and approved CAFTA-DR by a slim margin, but the
negative campaign created an environment where issues related to IPR
remain politically controversial.
--------------------------------------------- --
NOW CAFTA-DR COMPLIANT. . .WITH AN IPR FOOTNOTE
--------------------------------------------- --
¶4. (U) After Costa Rica was included in the Priority Watch List in
2001, the country took the necessary steps to bring into force the
WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Performance and Phonograms
Treaty (WPPT) on March 6, 2002 and May 20, 2002, respectively.
Costa Rica also ratified the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Costa
Rica posted incremental -- but limited -- IPR progress over the past
several years (Refs B and C).
¶5. (SBU) Since last year's Special 301 Report, Costa Rica made all
the necessary legislative reforms to comply with CAFTA-DR
obligations related to IPR. In recognition of meeting CAFTA
standards through legislative reforms, the United States Trade
Representative (USTR) certified Costa Rican CAFTA-DR compliance in
late 2008, paving the way for EIF a few weeks later. However, three
technical corrections remain for legislative action by the Costa
Rican national assembly. Packaged into one final piece of
legislation, the corrections (Ref E) must be passed into law by
January 1, 2010. Failure to do so will result in a holdback of
tariff preferences on a select category of Costa Rican export
products, most likely sugar. The Arias Administration is confident
that the process will be completed in 2009.
-------------------------------------------
. . . BUT SADDLED BY ENFORCEMENT CHALLENGES
-------------------------------------------
¶6. (U) Despite these legislative victories, real challenges remain
in effectively ensuring that the laws have an impact on the local
IPR environment. Throughout 2008, Costa Rica continued to falter in
enforcing its IPR laws, which criminalize counterfeiting and piracy.
The country's public prosecutors have consistently demurred from
prosecuting IPR cases unless they involve potential harm to people
or the environment. The prosecution of IPR crimes is handled by
public prosecutors in the "various crimes" divisions of the branch
offices of the Attorney General's office (in which an individual was
appointed with responsibility for IPR prosecution). Crimes related
to IPR form only a portion of the portfolio of these prosecutors and
receive little attention. Rather, the prosecutors tend to invoke
"opportunity criteria" (akin to prosecutorial discretion) to avoid
opening investigations into reported IPR crimes.
¶7. (U) The Attorney General of Costa Rica, Francisco Dall'Anese,
publicly and privately reiterated that he does not support diverting
limited resources to the prosecution of IPR crimes. Rather, he
maintains that private companies can seek redress in civil courts or
can initiate a criminal public action through private application.
By this process, a private party (almost always through an attorney)
files a complaint and jointly conducts the investigation and
prosecution of the case with the public prosecutor. While this
could be an effective means of prosecuting IPR violators, the
reality is that the private sector and the prosecutor's office have
yet to coordinate in a meaningful way. Likewise, the use of the
civil courts to pursue private cases against IPR violators is
hampered by the extreme length of time it takes to receive a civil
judgment (up to 15 years) and the small monetary damages awarded.
¶8. (SBU) Industry and others have asked Dall'Anese to halt the
nearly automatic use of opportunity criteria with IPR crimes, but he
has rebuffed their calls, and is in a position to do so. The
position of Attorney General in Costa Rica is entirely independent
of the Costa Rican Executive and Legislative Branches.
Constitutionally, the position falls under the Judiciary, but, in
practice, it is almost completely autonomous. Dall'Anese was
reelected to a second four year term as Attorney General in late
¶2007. (COMMENT: Knowledgeable local contacts tell us that
Dall'Anese is unlikely to run for a third term in 2011. END
COMMENT.)
¶9. (U) The few prosecutions that wound their way through the
criminal court system over the last two years were originally
started long before. In February 2008, industry successfully
concluded a prosecution against a counterfeiter of apparel. As has
been the case in previous successful IPR prosecutions, the judge
immediately paroled the convicted counterfeiter as it was her first
offense and the sentence was for less than three years. (COMMENT: No
matter the crime, judges in Costa Rica have the latitude to
immediately parole first-offenders who have been sentenced to less
than three years of prison. Judges generally use this power in all
criminal cases when it can be applied. END COMMENT.)
--------------------------------------
AT THE BORDER: ARE THE GOODS GENUINE?
--------------------------------------
¶10. (U) Officers within the FBI-equivalent Judicial Police (OIJ)
state that most counterfeit goods within Costa Rica are imported
from elsewhere rather than manufactured in the country.
Unfortunately, Costa Rica's Customs service continues to face
difficulties in halting the flow of counterfeit goods into the
country. The leadership of Customs is aware of the importance of
seizing pirated goods, but most customs agents lack the necessary
training to recognize counterfeits. Local industry has also
expressed an interest in providing counterfeit recognition training
to Customs officials.
¶11. (U) In addition, the laws regulating the filing of criminal
cases can impede the seizure of pirated goods at the border. If a
customs agent recognizes that a shipment contains pirated goods, the
agent can order the shipment seized for 48 hours. If, at the end of
that period, the holder of the IPR for the product involved has not
filed a criminal complaint against the importer, the customs agent
must either release the goods or file a criminal complaint. The
latter action can open the agent up to personal liability through a
countersuit by the importer if the criminal complaint is ultimately
unsuccessful.
¶12. (U) Recent changes in the law give the customs agent ten days
from seizure to file the criminal complaint, but the customs agent
continues to be personally liable if the complaint is unsuccessful.
Increased communication between Customs and industry would help
solve this problem by providing time for the owner of the trademark
or patent to file the police report. In such cases, even if the
prosecutor ultimately invokes opportunity criteria and abandons
his/her role in the criminal prosecution, the private party could
continue the action, aided by the fact that the goods have already
been seized by Customs.
--------------------------------------------- ---
COSTA RICAN PATENT OFFICE: CAPACITY BY CONTRACT
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶13. (SBU) In 2008 the Costa Rican Industrial Property (IP) Office
of the National Registry finally began to address severe delays in
processing patent applications. Through 2007, patent attorneys in
Costa Rica related that the office had not yet begun processing
patent cases first submitted in 2004 and 2005. The table below
illustrates progress, although the backlog may take years to erase.
Number of Application Approvals
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008
Patent 13 4 13 53
Utility Model 0 1 1 2
Industrial Model 4 3 2 21
Industrial Design 1 1 - 15
TOTAL 18 9 16 91
Source: Industrial Property Registry
The IP Office informs us that in 2008 the office completed the
review of a total of 140 applications, approving the 91 shown above
and rejecting 49. While new patent applications are immediately
processed, there is still a backlog of about 1,200 patent
applications waiting for technical review.
¶14. (U) The IP Office believes that it is on the verge of hiring
five in-house patent examiners with training and experience in
specific areas of science and technology. It has taken several
years to create these positions. These in-house examiners will not
be hired within the Civil Service structure and therefore may be
paid salaries commensurate with their expertise. To date, the IP
office has relied heavily on contract relationships with the Costa
Rican Technical Institute and the Pharmacists Board Association to
provide experts to serve as outside examiners. The IP Office will
continue to use these and other outside examiners to move through
the backlog of patent applications.
¶15. (U) The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has
worked closely with the Costa Rican IP Office to train employees.
WIPO also offered training to officials in the judiciary that have
an interest in IPR. In addition, the U.S. Embassy sent eight Costa
Rican officials to the USPTO's Global Intellectual Property Academy
for training.
--------------------------------------
USE/PROCUREMENT OF GOVERNMENT SOFTWARE
--------------------------------------
¶16. (U) The 2002 Executive Decree #30, 151-J, mandated that all
government ministries use only legally-licensed computer software.
According to this decree, each ministry was to conduct an internal
audit and submit a statement of compliance no later than July 31,
¶2003. The government subsequently claimed full certification of all
ministries, although there had been no independent confirmation.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶17. (SBU) In general, parts of the Costa Rican government, notably
the judiciary, do not yet view IPR as a tool to spur innovation.
The executive branch recognizes the value of IPR enforcement and
prosecution and the private sector wants judicial action on IPR
cases. After making progress in IPR legislation as instituted by
CAFTA-DR's entry into force, the focus of attention is now on the
judiciary and how it handles cases in a CAFTA-DR compliant IPR
regime.
¶18. (SBU) Therefore, based on the GOCR's progress to date in
improving the country's IPR framework -- legislative reforms,
political will in the executive branch, sharp increase in patent
application approvals, and receptivity to training opportunities --
Post recommends that Costa Rica remain on the Watch List. This is
the properly-modulated message, in our view. To lower Costa Rica's
standing immediately after the GOCR finally completed its CAFTA-DR
implementation obligations would be too harsh a signal. Such a move
would likely be viewed as provocative by the Arias administration,
which worked very hard to pass the necessary IPR legislation for
CAFTA-DR EIF. This would also be counterproductive to our low-key
but steady efforts to work with the GOCR and the private sector (and
around the Attorney General, if necessary) to improve IPR
protection.
CIANCHETTE