

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AF
AE
AR
AORC
AJ
AU
AM
ABLD
AL
AMGT
ASUP
AFIN
APER
ABUD
AVERY
APCS
AEMR
ADCO
APECO
ASIG
AG
AA
AS
AFFAIRS
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AMED
AO
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ATRN
AID
AC
AGMT
CH
CO
CS
CE
CU
CLINTON
CG
CVIS
CMGT
CI
CJAN
CF
COM
CASC
CA
CBW
CM
CDG
CR
COUNTER
CD
CWC
CKGR
CN
CPAS
CJUS
CV
CONS
CT
CY
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
ECON
EFIN
EAIR
EUN
EINV
ENRG
EG
ETRD
EPET
ETTC
ELAB
EU
ER
ET
EAGR
ECPS
ECIN
ELTN
EAID
EMIN
EWWT
EFIS
EIND
EC
ES
EN
EI
ENVR
ENGR
ENIV
EUNCH
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELN
EZ
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EINT
EUR
ECINECONCS
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EK
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IN
IC
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
IT
ICTY
IO
IA
IWC
ID
ICRC
ILC
INTELSAT
IMO
ISRAELI
IACI
ILO
ITRA
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
ICAO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
INTERPOL
IV
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KDEM
KCRM
KJUS
KTIA
KWBG
KPAL
KIPR
KTIP
KE
KNNP
KGHG
KICC
KV
KTFN
KU
KCFE
KDRG
KWMN
KSCA
KGIC
KCOR
KFRD
KPKO
KSUM
KPRP
KPAO
KBCT
KIRF
KCFC
KISL
KREC
KSPR
KHIV
KBIO
KMCA
KMPI
KFLU
KSTH
KBTR
KS
KOMC
KOMS
KSEP
KPRV
KFLO
KHLS
KN
KWWMN
KUNR
KLIG
KSTC
KZ
KG
KRAD
KOLY
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KAWK
KCIP
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KIDE
KSAF
KX
KWMNCS
KNEI
KCRS
KVPR
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KACT
KO
KFSC
KR
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MO
MX
MCAP
ML
MTCRE
MR
MP
MY
MU
MIL
MAR
MC
MRCRE
MTRE
MA
MEPI
MV
MPOS
MD
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OREP
OVIP
OFDP
ODIP
OPDC
OAS
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPRC
OVP
OSCI
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PREF
PTER
PARM
PBTS
PINR
PINS
PHSA
PK
POL
PM
PINT
PE
PINF
PEL
PA
PARMS
PO
PLN
PROP
PALESTINIAN
PAO
PL
POV
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
SENV
SY
SZ
SOCI
SO
SR
SNAR
SA
SP
SW
SMIG
SU
SCUL
SC
SAN
SN
SL
SG
SYR
SEVN
SF
SI
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TRGY
TU
TBIO
TH
TS
TSPL
TT
TPHY
TSPA
TI
TK
TIP
TERRORISM
TZ
TX
TW
TD
TP
TC
TO
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TURKEY
UK
UNGA
UN
UNHRC
UNMIK
UNO
UZ
UNSC
UP
UG
UNHCR
UNDC
US
UNAUS
USTR
UV
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UAE
USEU
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05SANJOSE1713, COSTA RICAN REACTION TO CAFTA-DR APPROVAL IN THE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SANJOSE1713.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SAN JOSE 001713
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
WHA/CEN
EB FOR WCRAFT
E FOR TSMITHAM
WHA FOR WMIELE
WHA/EPSC FOR KURS
H FOR JHAGAN
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR JYOUNG, CPADILLA, AMALITO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECPS ECON PREL PGOV SOCI CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICAN REACTION TO CAFTA-DR APPROVAL IN THE
U.S. CONGRESS
REF: (A) SAN JOSE 01587
(B) SAN JOSE 01636
(C )SAN JOSE 01693
(D) SAN JOSE 01455
¶1. (U) Summary. After passage of the CAFTA-DR implementing
legislation in the late evening hours (in Costa Rica) by
the U.S. House of Representatives, GOCR officials, private
business persons, and labor leaders offered their
reactions. Local media coverage of the ratification
process in the U.S. has been intense, and the approval in
the U.S. made front-page headlines in almost all of the
major national daily newspapers. At this time, it appears
that approval in the U.S. did not change the overall
opinions of these Costa Ricans, but it has brought
increased focus on CAFTA-DR and a sense of urgency to some
regarding the need to start formal discussions of this
issue in the Legislative Assembly. End Summary.
¶2. (U) Local media have been following the U.S. House of
Representatives' vote closely. As an example of the high
profile of this event, the vote was carried live on CNN en
espanol on cable systems. Daily newspapers, "La Nacion,"
"La Republica," and "La Prensa Libre" made the CAFTA-DR
issue front-page news, and interviews of key CAFTA-DR
personalities filled the airwaves offering their reactions
to the approval in the U.S. Congress.
¶3. (U) Minister of Foreign Trade (COMEX) Manuel Gonazalez
was quoted as stating that "the approval of CAFTA yesterday
fills us with optimism. However, Costa Rica will continue
its process of analysis on its own timetable." These
statements are consistent with his and President Pacheco's
previous lukewarm and conflicting comments about the
ratification process in Costa Rica (Refs A and B). COMEX
is the governmental organization that negotiated CAFTA-DR
and is responsible for production and implementation of the
complementary agenda for CAFTA-DR (Ref C).
¶4. (U) Oscar Arias, former president of Costa Rica and
front runner in the next presidential election, stated that
he is very happy with the vote in the U.S. and that "it is
an opportunity to boost development, to increase investment
that will create employment opportunities.". He goes on to
state that he hopes that the current administration will
decide to send CAFTA-DR to the Legislative Assembly. He
added that to not do so would have a negative effect on the
country.
¶5. (U) Gerardo Gonzalez, President of the 57-member
Legislative Assembly, told the press that he would like the
President to send CAFTA-DR to the Assembly as soon as
possible to allow discussions to begin on this important
issue. He stated that "the country is falling behind . and
it is urgent that we start discussion [of CAFTA-DR] in the
Assembly." He added that he is against the President's
condition of requiring approval of the Fiscal Reform (tax
increase) bill prior to sending CAFTA-DR to the Assembly
for ratification (Ref D). Gonzalez is opposed to the
Fiscal Reform bill in its current form because special tax
treatment that some Assembly members have proposed in over
1000 amendments to the bill.
¶6. (U) Those opposed to CAFTA-DR tried to minimize the
approval vote of the U.S. Congress. Albino Vargas,
President of the approximately 15,000-member National
Association of Private and Public Employees (ANEP),
continued to voice his opposition to the agreement and
stated that approval in the U.S. did not change his or the
organization's stance on CAFTA-DR, and that it has nothing
to do with ANEP's labor agenda. He stated that
"independently of what the U.S. decides, the struggle of
those in Costa Rica who oppose CAFTA-DR continues
unaltered. There is a large part of the citizenry that
will take to the streets when CAFTA-DR is sent to the
Assembly."
¶7. (U) In a discussion with Poloff, Rodrigo Aguilar,
president of the 90,000-member labor union federation Rerum
Novarum, expressed his disappointment that CAFTA-DR was
passed by the House of Representatives, but holds out hope
that Pacheco's Commission of Eminent Persons will return a
negative recommendation (Ref B). He acknowledged that
Pacheco will come under increasing pressure from commercial
interests to present the treaty but believes Pacheco will
wait for the Commission's report, which will be available
no sooner than September 17, 2005. Aguilar reconfirmed his
labor organization's determination to participate, if not
organize, anti-CAFTA-DR demonstrations upon its
presentation to the Legislative Assembly. When asked
whether he had considered possible uses for labor
enforcement funds attached by the U.S. Senate, he admitted
he had not thought of this, but agreed it could have
positive impact.
¶8. (U) In "Al Dia," Epsy Campbell, head of the left-
leaning Citizens' Action Party (PAC) Assembly members,
expressed that "we will do everything possible to ensure
that [CAFTA-DR] is not approved in Costa Rica.". She
believes that the country deserves something better and
acknowledges that increased pressure will come to pass
CAFTA-DR, not only from the U.S., but also from the local
business sector.
¶9. (U) Many local business representatives see the
approval in the U.S. as a very positive sign, and
acknowledge that there is now a sense of urgency in the
ratification process in Costa Rica. Miguel Schyfter, owner
of a clothing manufacturing company, stated that "we must
hasten the [ratification] process because there are
thousands of textile workers who will see their jobs move
to other Central American countries if investment
conditions are not clarified [via implementation of CAFTA-
DR] in Costa Rica." Bart De Lange, an exporter of
ornamental plants, stated that "investment in Costa Rican
business is paralyzed because of the delay with the
ratification process of CAFTA-DR. Ratification in the U.S.
puts us up against the clock." Other business
representatives said that every day that passes without
CAFTA-DR in effect is a lost opportunity to take advantage
of the benefits of the trade agreement.
¶10. (U) Luis Guillermo Solis, a noted political analyst,
stated that "the approval of CAFTA-DR in the U.S. has
increased the pressure to start the discussions in Costa
Rica. However, the current political setting for this
discussion is not the best. It would be irresponsible to
discuss this issue in the middle of an electoral campaign."
He implies that, since the entire Assembly and
Administration will change, this issue should be left to
the next Legislative Assembly and Administration which will
take office in May 2006.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶11. (SBU) The process of passage of the implementing
legislation by the U.S. House of Representatives has not
yet had a noticeable effect on the GOCR. President Pacheco
has painted himself into a corner by publicly and
repeatedly stating that he will not send CAFTA-DR to the
Assembly until (1) the Commission of Eminent Persons
delivers its report to the President; and (2) the Assembly
passes the Fiscal Reform bill. The former task will not be
completed, at the earliest, until mid-September, and it is
doubtful that the latter task will ever be completed in his
administration. The one thing that is certain is that
President Pacheco's administration will have to live with
more pressure from those favoring CAFTA-DR and those
against.
KAPLAN