

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AF
AE
AR
AORC
AJ
AU
AM
ABLD
AL
AMGT
ASUP
AFIN
APER
ABUD
AVERY
APCS
AEMR
ADCO
APECO
ASIG
AG
AA
AS
AFFAIRS
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AMED
AO
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ATRN
AID
AC
AGMT
CH
CO
CS
CE
CU
CLINTON
CG
CVIS
CMGT
CI
CJAN
CF
COM
CASC
CA
CBW
CM
CDG
CR
COUNTER
CD
CWC
CKGR
CN
CPAS
CJUS
CV
CONS
CT
CY
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
ECON
EFIN
EAIR
EUN
EINV
ENRG
EG
ETRD
EPET
ETTC
ELAB
EU
ER
ET
EAGR
ECPS
ECIN
ELTN
EAID
EMIN
EWWT
EFIS
EIND
EC
ES
EN
EI
ENVR
ENGR
ENIV
EUNCH
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELN
EZ
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EINT
EUR
ECINECONCS
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EK
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IN
IC
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
IT
ICTY
IO
IA
IWC
ID
ICRC
ILC
INTELSAT
IMO
ISRAELI
IACI
ILO
ITRA
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
ICAO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
INTERPOL
IV
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KDEM
KCRM
KJUS
KTIA
KWBG
KPAL
KIPR
KTIP
KE
KNNP
KGHG
KICC
KV
KTFN
KU
KCFE
KDRG
KWMN
KSCA
KGIC
KCOR
KFRD
KPKO
KSUM
KPRP
KPAO
KBCT
KIRF
KCFC
KISL
KREC
KSPR
KHIV
KBIO
KMCA
KMPI
KFLU
KSTH
KBTR
KS
KOMC
KOMS
KSEP
KPRV
KFLO
KHLS
KN
KWWMN
KUNR
KLIG
KSTC
KZ
KG
KRAD
KOLY
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KAWK
KCIP
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KIDE
KSAF
KX
KWMNCS
KNEI
KCRS
KVPR
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KACT
KO
KFSC
KR
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MO
MX
MCAP
ML
MTCRE
MR
MP
MY
MU
MIL
MAR
MC
MRCRE
MTRE
MA
MEPI
MV
MPOS
MD
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OREP
OVIP
OFDP
ODIP
OPDC
OAS
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPRC
OVP
OSCI
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PREF
PTER
PARM
PBTS
PINR
PINS
PHSA
PK
POL
PM
PINT
PE
PINF
PEL
PA
PARMS
PO
PLN
PROP
PALESTINIAN
PAO
PL
POV
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
SENV
SY
SZ
SOCI
SO
SR
SNAR
SA
SP
SW
SMIG
SU
SCUL
SC
SAN
SN
SL
SG
SYR
SEVN
SF
SI
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TRGY
TU
TBIO
TH
TS
TSPL
TT
TPHY
TSPA
TI
TK
TIP
TERRORISM
TZ
TX
TW
TD
TP
TC
TO
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TURKEY
UK
UNGA
UN
UNHRC
UNMIK
UNO
UZ
UNSC
UP
UG
UNHCR
UNDC
US
UNAUS
USTR
UV
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UAE
USEU
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SANJOSE475, REQUEST TO END FOOD STAPLE EXPORT RESTRICTIONS:
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SANJOSE475.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08SANJOSE475 | 2008-06-05 00:12 | 2011-03-21 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy San Jose |
P 050033Z JUN 08
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9810
INFO WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000475
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EEB/TPP/ABT AWINTON, EEB/TPP/ABT/ATP JSPECK,
EBB/TPP/MLURIE, EBB/IFD/ODF MSIEMER, PLEASE PASS TO
FAS/OCRA BZANIN, PLEASE PASS TO USDA, PLEASE PASS TO
TREASURY/SGRAY
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CS EAGR ECON ETRD PREL TBIO
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO END FOOD STAPLE EXPORT RESTRICTIONS:
COSTA RICA
REF: A. STATE 53353 B. SAN JOSE 347
¶1. SUMMARY: Costa Rica,s rising food prices have had
minimal political impact to date. From 2006 to 2007, wage
increases kept pace with food price increases. Over the past
year, that relationship changed with food price increases
easily eclipsing wage increases (Ref B). Although domestic
food security concerns are gaining strength, most
recommendations focus on increasing domestic production and
productivity. Costa Rica proposed a National Food Plan on
May 7, 2008 which aims to increase local grains production
and provide direct cash transfers to the most vulnerable
members of Costa Rican society. There have been virtually no
calls for export restrictions as a means of dealing with
rising food prices. END SUMMARY
----------------
IS THERE A PLAN?
----------------
¶2. On Thursday, May 7, 2008, the GOCR presented a National
Food Plan that aims to ensure the availability of basic
staples to the population and support the Costa Rican farm
sector. There are different estimates of the cost of the
government,s plan, ranging from USD 60 million to USD 88
million. The GOCR intends to reallocate existing government
resources and to send an &extraordinary8 budget to the
national assembly (Asamblea) to obtain funding for the
National Food Plan.
¶3. The government,s strategy establishes short, medium and
long term actions. The main goal is to secure the
availability of basic food staples such as corn, beans and
rice. The goal for rice, as an example, is to expand
production to a total of 73,627 hectares by 2010, in order to
cover 80 percent of domestic rice consumption (up from the
current 50 percent).
-------------------------
ARE THERE OTHER BENEFITS?
-------------------------
¶4. To increase local grains production, the National Food
Plan calls for an increase in crop insurance coverage by
allocating an additional USD 8 million through the National
Insurance Institute (INS). In addition, the GOCR will
instruct the national banking system to increase credit
allocations to small- and medium-size producers for
agricultural equipment and machinery. The resources
available through these programs will be approximately USD 16
million. The plan also incorporates support to producers for
joint seed and fertilizer purchases at lower prices.
¶5. According to Casa Presidencial, the GOCR,s main concern
is to provide a safeguard to the poorest segments of the
population. The plan intends to increase the number of
scholarship beneficiaries by 42,292 through the National
Scholarship Fund (FONABE). Six million dollars will be made
available for this program through a budget modification.
The plan will also allocate direct cash transfers of USD 100
per month to 16,000 families in extreme poverty for a total
of USD 9.6 million. In addition, the plan will reinforce the
&Let,s Advance8 and CEN-CINAI (Centers for Children,s
Education and Nutrition) programs with up to an additional
USD 20 million. Both programs target the poorest segment of
the Costa Rican population.
-----------------------
IS THE PLAN AFFORDABLE?
-----------------------
¶6. The GOCR will fund the National Food Plan through a
combination of reallocating currently budgeted but unspent
funds and borrowing. Also, the GOCR plans to take advantage
of the savings in debt service that it has achieved over the
past two years. Just this week, after a CenAm, Panama, and
Dominican Republic ministerial meeting with the
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), GOCR,s Minister of
Finance, Guillermo Zuniga stated that Costa Rica will not
participate in the IDB,s USD 500 million program for
mitigating the impact of the rising food process. Minister
Zuniga will work with the Ministry of Agriculture to make the
most of existing or internal sources of financing. The IDB
noted two possibilities for Costa Rica:
(1) identifying funds for the Plan in an existing IDB rural
development project; and
(2) determining if Banco de Nacional de Costa Rica has the
ability to provide additional financing for small and medium
enterprises (PYME) from its existing PYME portfolio.
In addition, the GOCR seeks an IDB assessment of the fiscal
impact of the proposed insurance program on the budgets of
the GOCR and INS.
¶7. Based on consultations with Treasury,s Office of
Technical Assistance (OTA) in Costa Rica, Post believes that
the National Food Plan will have limited fiscal impact. The
OTA confirms that government revenues have exceeded
expectations and that spending remains under control. Given
the current fiscal situation, and assuming that revenues and
expenditures continue their recent positive trends, the GOCR
estimates that it will maintain a balanced or near-balanced
budget for 2008.
------------------
THE FISCAL CONTEXT
------------------
¶8. To help put the proposed cost of the National Food Plan
into context, the maximum estimate of USD 88 million
represents only 0.3 percent of Costa Rica,s 2007 GDP.
According to the OTA, the GOCR finished 2007 with a budget
surplus of approximately USD 173 million, almost double the
National Food Plan,s highest estimated cost. By some
measures of the 2008 budget, the GOCR will finish the year
with over USD 4.5 billion in total revenue. If the
government reaches this target in 2008, the USD 88 million
figure would represent less than 2 percent of total fiscal
revenues.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶9. We consider the National Food Plan to be a moderate and
reasonable reaction on the part of the GOCR to the recent
increase in food prices. The GOCR is attempting to increase
domestic food production, which is exactly the recommendation
of the USG (Refs A and B). Whether the effort will achieve
its ambitious goals remains to be seen, as producers will
need to be convinced to shift land from crops that have been
quite profitable in recent years (e.g. pineapples, melons,
oranges) to crops that historically generated poor returns.
The GOCR is also attempting to mitigate the effects of
increases in food prices on the most vulnerable members of
Costa Rican society. Based on current projections, the
government can afford its National Food Plan with minimal
fiscal consequences. Both financially and substantively, the
plan seems appropriate given Costa Rica,s current needs and
resources. Most importantly, there are currently no plans to
implement any sort of food export restrictions (Ref A). END
COMMENT.
¶10. FAS at Post provided the analysis of the GOCR,s
National Food Plan (see paras 2-5).
CIANCHETTE