

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AF
AE
AR
AORC
AJ
AU
AM
ABLD
AL
AMGT
ASUP
AFIN
APER
ABUD
AVERY
APCS
AEMR
ADCO
APECO
ASIG
AG
AA
AS
AFFAIRS
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AMED
AO
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ATRN
AID
AC
AGMT
CH
CO
CS
CE
CU
CLINTON
CG
CVIS
CMGT
CI
CJAN
CF
COM
CASC
CA
CBW
CM
CDG
CR
COUNTER
CD
CWC
CKGR
CN
CPAS
CJUS
CV
CONS
CT
CY
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
ECON
EFIN
EAIR
EUN
EINV
ENRG
EG
ETRD
EPET
ETTC
ELAB
EU
ER
ET
EAGR
ECPS
ECIN
ELTN
EAID
EMIN
EWWT
EFIS
EIND
EC
ES
EN
EI
ENVR
ENGR
ENIV
EUNCH
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELN
EZ
EXTERNAL
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EINT
EUR
ECINECONCS
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EK
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IN
IC
IR
IZ
IS
IAEA
IT
ICTY
IO
IA
IWC
ID
ICRC
ILC
INTELSAT
IMO
ISRAELI
IACI
ILO
ITRA
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
ICAO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
INTERPOL
IV
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KDEM
KCRM
KJUS
KTIA
KWBG
KPAL
KIPR
KTIP
KE
KNNP
KGHG
KICC
KV
KTFN
KU
KCFE
KDRG
KWMN
KSCA
KGIC
KCOR
KFRD
KPKO
KSUM
KPRP
KPAO
KBCT
KIRF
KCFC
KISL
KREC
KSPR
KHIV
KBIO
KMCA
KMPI
KFLU
KSTH
KBTR
KS
KOMC
KOMS
KSEP
KPRV
KFLO
KHLS
KN
KWWMN
KUNR
KLIG
KSTC
KZ
KG
KRAD
KOLY
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KAWK
KCIP
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KIDE
KSAF
KX
KWMNCS
KNEI
KCRS
KVPR
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KACT
KO
KFSC
KR
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KRFD
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MO
MX
MCAP
ML
MTCRE
MR
MP
MY
MU
MIL
MAR
MC
MRCRE
MTRE
MA
MEPI
MV
MPOS
MD
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OREP
OVIP
OFDP
ODIP
OPDC
OAS
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPRC
OVP
OSCI
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PREF
PTER
PARM
PBTS
PINR
PINS
PHSA
PK
POL
PM
PINT
PE
PINF
PEL
PA
PARMS
PO
PLN
PROP
PALESTINIAN
PAO
PL
POV
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
SENV
SY
SZ
SOCI
SO
SR
SNAR
SA
SP
SW
SMIG
SU
SCUL
SC
SAN
SN
SL
SG
SYR
SEVN
SF
SI
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TRGY
TU
TBIO
TH
TS
TSPL
TT
TPHY
TSPA
TI
TK
TIP
TERRORISM
TZ
TX
TW
TD
TP
TC
TO
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TURKEY
UK
UNGA
UN
UNHRC
UNMIK
UNO
UZ
UNSC
UP
UG
UNHCR
UNDC
US
UNAUS
USTR
UV
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UAE
USEU
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SANJOSE882, GOCR FEARS THAT LAX ECUADOR VISA POLICY IS FUELING
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SANJOSE882.
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0882/01 3172209
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 122209Z NOV 08
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0256
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO PRIORITY 1351
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL PRIORITY 0166
RHEFHLC/HOMELAND SECURITY CENTER WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/US CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0149
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SAN JOSE 000882
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/CEN, WHA/AND, WHA/PPC, EAP/CM AND CA
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/12/2018
TAGS: PREL PTER ASEC CVIS KCRM KFRD EC KTIP CS
SUBJECT: GOCR FEARS THAT LAX ECUADOR VISA POLICY IS FUELING
ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
Classified By: DCM Peter M. Brennan for reason 1.4(d).
--------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (C) "Ecuador is causing instability for all America" since
it dropped its tourist visa requirements for all
nationalities in June, according to Mario Zamora, head of the
GOCR General Directorate of Immigration (DGI, Spanish
acronym). GOCR Immigration officials that traveled to
Ecuador in October reported that approximately 10,000 Chinese
had entered Ecuador over the last four months. Zamora feared
that these Chinese were heading for Costa Rica and for the
United States and that many could fall victim to forced labor
trafficking or human smuggling "coyotaje." Some had applied
for Costa Rican permanent residency in Beijing and then asked
that their notification be sent to them in Ecuador,
suggesting the beginning of an organized fraud pattern.
Zamora told us that flights from Ecuador through Costa Rica
(a TACA Airlines hub for flights headed north) had become
"very cosmopolitan," and he feared an influx of irregular
migration of Eastern Europeans, Arabs, South Americans and
Africans. END SUMMARY.
------------------------------------------
CHINESE: INCREASED NUMBERS; POSSIBLE FRAUD
------------------------------------------
¶2. (C) The DGI became concerned recently when officials
noticed a pattern among non-related Chinese "family
reunification" residency petitions. Approximately 10 to 15
cases surfaced, involving young males aged 17 to 20, in which
the applicants filed petitions in Beijing to come to Costa
Rica, but requested that status notifications be sent to
Ecuador. Zamora admitted that it did not make sense for
Chinese to await Costa Rican residency in Ecuador, and he
offered as hypotheses that an organized fraud ring was
smuggling or trafficking Chinese, or that such a ring was
arranging valid residencies for Chinese but then using the
documents for impostors waiting in Ecuador. Zamora,
following a policy of "caution and prevention," dispatched
two officials to Quito last month to reinforce training for
GOCR consuls and to meet with Ecuadorian and Chinese
officials. The DGI halted the above-mentioned residency
cases; the applicants will have to reapply under tighter
documentary requirements, including signatures of both
parents on application forms, and GOCR consuls in Beijing and
Quito will take a closer look at the underlying Chinese
documents, such as birth certificates, for evidence of fraud.
¶3. (C) According to a DGI report provided to us, Ecuadorian
Immigration Director Luis Ordonez Sanchez told the GOCR DGI
that between June 20 and the October meeting, 10,748 Chinese
had entered Ecuador and 4826 of those had departed,
compared to 2007 statistics showing only 4776 Chinese entries
and 4417 departures. Ordonez reported that even with those
statistics, it was too early to determine the positive or
negative effect that dropping the visa requirement had, even
though officials were aware that many of the Chinese were
looking to the U.S. as their final destination. Ordonez said
that the measure was designed to increase tourism, investment
and trade, as well as to "increase the free movement of
people into and out of the country."
¶4. (C) According to the DGI report, in a separate meeting
with Chinese Political Counselor in Ecuador Gu Jiafeng, Gu
told DGI officials that the majority of Chinese who had
entered since June 20 came from the poorest provinces, Fujian
and Guadong, and the Chinese government was concerned that
they would fall victim to trafficking and smuggling rings in
Ecuador. Gu reportedly said that only a third had departed
Ecuador "regularly" and that the rest stayed in Ecuador or
sought to go illegally to Brazil, Colombia, Peru or to their
most desired destination - the United States.
-----------------------------------
FLIGHTS FROM ECUADOR "COSMOPOLITAN"
-----------------------------------
¶5. (C) Zamora noted that daily flights arriving to San Jose
from Ecuador had recently become "very cosmopolitan" and were
receiving more scrutiny. Before, these flights carried more
"local" clientele but now included many South Americans and
Eastern Europeans, among others. Zamora explained that San
Jose is a hub for TACA Airlines' northbound flights. The DGI
detected a pattern that these more "diverse" flights from
Ecuador were generally transiting Costa Rica and headed to
Guatemala or Belize - two countries with extremely porous
Mexican borders - as their final destination.
--------------------------------------------
OTHER NATIONALITIES USING ECUADOR AS BRIDGE?
--------------------------------------------
¶6. (C) According to Zamora, Ecuadorian Immigration officials
told DGI officials that an unspecified number of Arabs were
now arriving in Ecuador. Anecdotally, Zamora told us that he
was concerned regarding Iraqis, Afghans and Iranians
transiting Ecuador to Colombia via land, moving to an
unspecified destination "north," who were caught and deported
from Colombia. Ecuadorian Immigration told the DGI that the
administration's decision to drop visa requirements came as a
surprise to the Immigration department. GOCR consuls in
Ecuador reported an increase in all types of visa
applications since June 20.
¶7. (C) Lastly, Zamora expressed concern about a potential
influx of African migration to the region. Whereas before
Brazilian Immigration was an obstacle even though there were
direct flights from Africa, now Africans could transit
Brazil and land in Ecuador. From there, they could migrate
over land.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶8. (C) COMMENT: Zamora's efforts at "caution and prevention"
are welcome and are in keeping with his efforts to enforce
Costa Rican immigration law more vigorously and to work with
regional counterparts (and us) more closely. We sense that
his instincts are correct, and we appreciate his more
"strategic" view of immigration throughout the region.
Though Zamora told us that there had thus far been no
indication that the emerging immigration patterns included
terrorist activity, he remains attentive to U.S. concerns,
and he continues to work closely with us on these issues. We
would be interested in Embassy Quito's/ConGen Guayaquil's
read of the Chinese immigration picture. Please advise. END
COMMENT.
CIANCHETTE